Stunning Skull Gives a Fresh Portrait of Early Humans

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Stunning Skull Gives a Fresh Portrait of Early Humans - Ann Gibbons - Science Vol 342 Oct 18, 2013

Citation preview

  • NEWS & ANALYSIS

    www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 342 18 OCTOBER 2013 297

    CR

    ED

    ITS

    :

    M. S

    . P

    ON

    CE

    DE

    LE

    N

    AN

    D C

    . P.

    E. Z

    OLLIK

    OF

    ER

    /UN

    IVE

    RS

    ITY

    OF

    ZU

    RIC

    H

    NEWS & ANALYSIS

    It was the ultimate birthday gift. On his 42nd

    birthday, 5 August 2005, paleoanthropolo-

    gist David Lordkipanidze was presented

    with the most complete early Homo skull

    ever found, freshly uncovered at his site of

    Dmanisi, Georgia. As paleontologists gently

    brushed dirt off its face, they saw strange,

    primitive features, unexpected in even an

    early member of our genus: a protruding,

    apelike upper jaw, and a tiny braincase. One

    scientist joked that you should put it back

    in the ground, Lordkipanidze recalls.

    Instead, Lordkipanidze and an interna-

    tional team spent 8 years studying the fossil,

    which they describe on page 326. Dating back

    to about 1.8 million years ago, the spectacu-

    lar skull includes delicate parts of the face,

    rare in other nds, making it the worlds rst

    completely preserved adult hominid skull

    of such antiquity, they write. Combined with

    skulls found earlier at Dmanisi, it also sug-

    gests that ancient individuals from the same

    time and place were very different from each

    other but still members of one speciesan

    idea that has implications for the perplex-

    ing patchwork of Homo fossils

    found in Africa.

    The skull is undoubtedly

    one of the most important ever

    discovered, says paleoanthro-

    pologist Ian Tattersall of the

    American Museum of Natural

    History in New York City. An

    iconic fossil, proclaims Tim White, a paleo-

    anthropologist at the University of California,

    Berkeley. It will stand out for a long time.

    Over the past 20 years, Lordkipanidze

    and his colleagues have unearthed skulls and

    skeletal bones from at least ve individuals

    from Dmanisi, a site that preserves the old-

    est human fossils found outside of Africa.

    These early humans used crude stone tools,

    probably for butchering animals, and lived

    near a river, a busy watering hole, says geo-

    archaeologist Reid Ferring of the University

    of North Texas, Denton. Ferring used argon

    isotopes to date the site to 1.77 million to

    1.85 million years ago, showing that Homo

    had expanded into Asia not long after

    the genus appeared in Africa.

    At that time about 18% of the sites

    animal bones belonged to carnivores,

    including fierce saber-toothed cats

    and an extinct giant cheetah. Con-

    frontations with these beasts would

    have been commonand danger-

    ous. All five individuals were found

    in underground dens where carnivores

    had probably dragged their carcasses.

    Ferring thinks the skeletons were all

    deposited within a couple centuries, at

    most, after which the dens collapsed.

    This carnivores cache has pro-

    duced new fossils season after

    season. The massive lower jaw of

    the new skull was found back in

    2000, and Lordkipanidze and oth-

    ers had expected to unearth a huge

    cranium to go with it. Instead they

    found the cranium of an older man

    with arthritis in his jaw, worn front

    teeth probably used as a gripping tooland

    a small brain of only 546 cubic centime-

    ters. Thats within range of an earlier human

    ancestor, Australopithecus, whose brains

    averaged 450 cm3, compared with 1350

    cm3 for modern humans, notes co-author

    Christoph Zollikofer, a neurobiologist at the

    University of Zurich in Switzerland. This

    con rms that our ancestors didnt need big

    brains to get out of Africa.

    When the researchers attached the lower

    jaw to the new cranium, designated Skull 5,

    the lower face bones jutted out more like an

    Australopithecus. This is, in essence, a very

    primitive face, says co-author Yoel Rak of

    Tel Aviv University in Israel.

    Yet its clearly Homo, many research-

    ers agree. The skulls vertically oriented

    upper face and the shape of the braincase

    distinguish it from Australopithecus. Skel-

    etal bones found with the skulls, including

    Skull 5, show that although these humans

    were short in stature, they had modern body

    proportions and could walk long distances

    (Science, 21 September 2007, p. 1664).

    But what species of Homo is it? Some

    fossils previously discovered at Dmanisi

    seemed to have links to H. erectus. But when

    the big lower jaw was found in 2000, some

    researchers suggested it belonged to a new

    species they called Homo georgicus.

    With the discovery of the new, fth skull,

    Stunning Skull Gives a Fresh Portrait of Early Humans

    PALEOANTHROPOLOGY

    Onlinesciencemag.org

    See slideshow for images of the new

    skull (http://scim.ag/slide_6156).

    C a s p i a nS e a

    Tu r key

    Sy r i a

    Rus s i aUk ra i ne

    Roman i a

    Bulgaria

    I t a l y

    G e o r g i a

    Azerbaijan

    Armenia

    I ran

    I raq

    Dmaninsi

    M e d i t e r r a n e a n S e a

    B l a c k S e a

    Putting their heads together. Researchers think that all ve of these skulls from Dmanisi belong in one species. Skull 5 is on the right.

    Published by AAAS

    on O

    ctob

    er 2

    1, 2

    013

    ww

    w.s

    cien

    cem

    ag.o

    rgD

    ownl

    oade

    d fro

    m

    on O

    ctob

    er 2

    1, 2

    013

    ww

    w.s

    cien

    cem

    ag.o

    rgD

    ownl

    oade

    d fro

    m

  • 18 OCTOBER 2013 VOL 342 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org 298

    NEWS&ANALYSIS

    A Prize for Molecular ModelingYouve seen the modelsmolecules rep-

    resented as balls connected by sticks, often

    pared down to a few lines on paper. Useful as

    they are to chemists, they leave out something

    essential: motion, the intricate dance of elec-

    trons and atomic nuclei breaking and fusing

    bonds as they undergo reactions. That dance

    is the heart of chemistry. Last weeks Nobel

    Prize in chemistry was awarded to three U.S.-

    based scientists for developing computer

    models that reveal how pro-

    teins and other compounds

    perform it.

    All three of this years

    chemistry laureates are nat-

    uralized U.S. citizens. Mar-

    tin Karplus of Harvard Uni-

    versity and the University

    of Strasbourg in France was

    born in 1930 in Vienna and

    moved to the United States

    just before the outbreak of

    World War II. Michael Lev-

    itt of Stanford Universi-

    tys School of Medicine in

    Palo Alto, Cal ifornia, was

    born in Pretoria in 1947,

    and today is a British, U.S., and Israeli cit-

    izen. And Arieh Warshel of the University

    of Southern California in Los Angeles was

    born in 1940 in Kibbutz Sde-Nahum, Israel,

    and still holds Israeli citizenship.

    More than 40 years ago, the three pio-

    neered new tools for fusing two disparate

    world views among chemists working to

    simulate molecules. One of them, grounded

    in classical Newtonian physics, treated mole-

    cules as collections of atomic balls connected

    by springlike bonds. Because this approach

    was mathematically tractable for large num-

    bers of atoms, it enabled researchers to sim-

    ulate proteins and other large molecules. In

    1969, Levitt and Warshel, then both at the

    Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot,

    Israel, designed a ball-and-spring com-

    puter model that could track how proteins

    and other large biomolecules oscillate and

    twist. But it couldnt calculate the changes

    in energy involved when chemicals react and

    form new molecules.

    Meanwhile, at Har-

    vard, Karplus was deeply

    enmeshed in the second

    approach to simulation,

    called quantum chem-

    istry. It was far better at

    simulating the motion of

    the electrons and atomic

    nuclei involved in reac-

    tions. But it was so com-

    putationally demanding

    that it was useful only in

    solving the behavior of

    small molecules.

    Trying to bring the

    quantum and classical CRE

    DIT

    S: (T

    OP

    ) JA

    Y M

    AT

    TE

    RN

    ES; (B

    OT

    TO

    M L

    EF

    T T

    O R

    IGH

    T) S

    TE

    PH

    AN

    IE M

    ITC

    HE

    LL/H

    AR

    VA

    RD

    STA

    FF

    PH

    OT

    OG

    RA

    PH

    ER

    ; LIN

    DA

    A. C

    ICE

    RO

    /STA

    NF

    OR

    D N

    EW

    S S

    ER

    VIC

    E; U

    SC

    PH

    OT

    O/M

    IRA

    ZIM

    ET;

    TH

    E N

    OB

    EL F

    OU

    ND

    AT

    ION

    the researchers had to confront head-on the

    variation among all ve. Age and sex prob-

    ably account for much of it: The skulls

    are thought to have belonged to an elderly

    toothless male, two mature males, a young

    female, and an adolescent of unknown sex.

    This broad sample from one place and a

    short span of time is what makes Dmanisi an

    exceptional site, White says. By analyzing

    the skull shapes with 3D computer-based

    methods, the researchers found that the

    range of variation in the group at Dmanisi

    was no greater than within living humans

    or chimps. The team concluded that all ve

    skulls belong to a single, variable species

    Putting all ve skulls into a single spe-

    cies still left the problem of what to call

    it. The team squabbled at rst. Looking at

    particular traits, they found that the upper

    jaw of Skull 5 most closely resembles the

    oldest fossil proposed as Homoa 2.3-

    million-year-old jaw from Ethiopia tenta-

    tively assigned to H. habilis. But Skull 5 also

    shares key features with H. erectus, such as

    thick brow ridges. In the end, the team set-

    tled on the cumbersome moniker of Homo

    erectus ergaster georgicus, which recog-

    nizes the skull as an earlier Georgian form

    of H. erectus. But they all prefer to call their

    nds early Homo.

    The skull shape analysis and classical

    trait analysis, done by Zollikofer and his Zur-

    ich colleague Marcia Ponce de Len, also

    showed that the skulls were as variable as

    African fossils traditionally classi ed in three

    different speciesH. erectus, H. habilis, and

    H. rudolfensis. If the Dmanisi fossils had been

    found in separate places in Africa, they could

    have been called separate species, Ponce de

    Len says. Lumping them all into H. erectus

    suggests that the early Homo fossils in Africa

    may also belong to that same, single lineage.

    That controversial idea is setting off a

    small bomb in the field, says co-author

    Philip Rightmire of Harvard University.

    Tattersall thinks Dmanisi could include more

    than one species, and that Skull 5 represents a

    new species. Paleoanthropologist Ron Clarke

    of the University of the Witwatersrand in

    Johannesburg, South Africa, counters that

    Skull 5 looks to me like Homo habilis. And

    while paleontologist Fred Spoor of the Max

    Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthro-

    pology in Leipzig, Germany, thinks it sen-

    sible to call Skull 5 H. erectus, he balks at

    the notion that fossils in Africa all belong in

    H. erectus, too, arguing that the teams analy-

    ses cant delineate diagnostic differences in

    skull shape.

    Whatever Skull 5s speci c identity, Spoor

    agrees that it is a fantastic, terri c speci-

    men. Says White: No matter what you call

    it, this skull and the others from Dmanisi are

    some of the best evidence we have about how,

    where, when, and why humans evolved.

    ANN GIBBONS

    Molecule and Market Studies Capture Nobel Laurels

    PR IZES

    Lowbrow. This artists reconstruction shows the new skulls small brain and protruding jaw.

    NOBEL PRIZE 2013NOBEL PRIZE 201

    CHEMISTRY

    MICHAEL LEVITT ARIEH WARSHELMARTIN KARPLUS

    Published by AAAS