Upload
maud-walsh
View
224
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Studying treatment of suicidal ideation & attempts: Designs, Statistical Analysis, and Methodological
Considerations
Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
Objective: To review the design and methodological factors that impact the study of interventions for suicidal ideation and attempts
Includes Evaluate the impact of the intervention Evaluate the intervention itself
Review of design Review of design considerations:considerations:
GoalsDesignSampleMeasuresProceduresData AnalysisTreatment Evaluation
Design considerationsDesign considerations
Type of design Questions that can be answeredQuestions that cannot be answeredMulti-method multi-trait approachStrengths and Limitations
Types of Design:Types of Design:
Pre-postControl/Comparison Group Randomized, stratified random, convenience
Longitudinal Prospective cohort design
Epidemiological Large scale cohort or case-control
Sample ConsiderationsSample Considerations
Who is the target of the intervention? Patients
All patients At-risk
Attempters, ideators
How is the sample selected?How is the sample selected?
Identification of Sample: Convenience vs. Random
Criteria for inclusion and exclusion: Recruitment and Screening
Demographic considerations: Age, sex, educational level
Determination of Control or Comparison Group
How will the nature of the sample How will the nature of the sample affect measurement and affect measurement and procedures?procedures?
Attainment of necessary sample size Developmental level and language level Potential burden/ load for participant Representativeness and generalizability Feasibility Time, place, implementation, ability of
participants, attrition
What needs to be measured?What needs to be measured?
OutcomeConfoundersMediators and ModeratorsContext
Administration ConsiderationsAdministration Considerations
Format Face-to-face interview, self-report, telephone,
computerSource of information Self, other informant, records, epidemiological
informationInstrument for repeated measures Same form, alternate forms
Outcome Measures Must:Outcome Measures Must:
Measure the target of interventionBe standardizedBe expected to change within the time frameBe Sensitive to changeBe present in all groupsHave a measurable effect sizeHave demonstrated reliability and validityBe feasible
Current Measures of OutcomeCurrent Measures of Outcome
Suicidal IdeationSuicide AttemptsCompleted SuicideLethality of attempt
# crisis callsAssociated symptomsAdjunctive medicationsHospitalization# referralsSocial Skills
Procedural ConsiderationsProcedural Considerations
Intervention Definition and manualization
# sessions, length, medication dose Expected outcomes relevant & measurable Training & ongoing supervision Maintenance of blind assessors Implementation of intervention and fidelity Adherence and attrition
Interval of Measurement One-shot, short-term, long-term
Recruitment Methods Systematic, documented Keeping people in the program
Investigator’s Role Avoid potential biases Appropriate level of supervision
Ethical Considerations Confidentiality, identification of risk, intervention
Feasibility
Considerations before conducting Considerations before conducting the study that impact data analysis:the study that impact data analysis:
Specific, testable hypotheses with data analytic strategy establishedPower AnalysisPotential confounders, mediators & moderatorsType and nature of dataNumber of analysesEffect sizes and variability of measuresData reductionManaging and imputing missing data
Types of AnalysesTypes of Analyses
Univariate T-tests, chi-square, ANOVA, Correlation,
nonparametric
Multivariate Repeated Measures Path Analysis Multiple Regression techniques Survival Analysis Time series or trend analysis
Points to consider when Points to consider when analyzing:analyzing:
Know your data before any analysesReliability is the upper limit of validityNo variability means no findingNot everything is linearBuild models based on univariate statistics- test with multivariateThe analysis must fit the type of dataWith numerical data, continuous variables are more informative than categorical variables
Evaluating an interventionEvaluating an intervention
FeasibilityFidelity to interventionReliability and validity of all measuresAttritionAdherenceConsumer satisfactionNegative Outcomes/ Adverse Events
Feasibility of the interventionFeasibility of the intervention
TimeResources: staff, space, money, suppliesAvailability of participantsSetting interest and amenabilityImplementation of interventionAssessment methods
Fidelity to InterventionFidelity to Intervention
Evaluation of trainingOngoing training and reliabilityOngoing monitoring of interventionStaff efficacy and satisfaction
AttritionAttrition
Assess from recruitment to end of studyCompare rate of attrition to typical ratesCompare drop-outs to study completers on baseline, demographic and relevant variables
Reliability and Validity of Reliability and Validity of MeasuresMeasures
Assess all measures with all appropriate forms of reliabilityTest discriminant and convergent validity
AdherenceAdherence
Embed measures of adherence in intervention and assessments Attendance Questions about previous sessions Test for medication or substances Follow-up behavioral questions
Consumer SatisfactionConsumer Satisfaction
ParticipantsStaffOutside Informants family members, service providers
Monitor Negative/ Adverse Monitor Negative/ Adverse EventsEvents
Document adverse events in a standard mannerAnticipate potential adverse events and prepare assessment and monitoring toolsPlan for suicidal risk
Special considerations for Special considerations for suicide researchsuicide research
Need enough suicidal behavior to notice a difference When is an intervention effective
Reduction vs. Elimination
Monitoring for safety in an potentially unsafe sampleDecision about when a participant is exited from the studyIntervention regarding suicidal behavior is an intervention that effects outcome behavior