17
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® STUDY TITLE Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation

STUDY TITLE

  • Upload
    avani

  • View
    30

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

STUDY TITLE. Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation. Briefing Purpose. Confirm the Tentatively Selected Plan. Discuss significant public, technical, and policy comments and their resolution. Discuss significant risks being carried forward in the study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: STUDY TITLE

US Army Corps of EngineersBUILDING STRONG®

STUDY TITLE

Presenter NamePresenter Title

Duty Location

Date of Presentation

Page 2: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Briefing Purpose Confirm the Tentatively Selected Plan.

Discuss significant public, technical, and policy comments and their resolution.

Discuss significant risks being carried forward in the study

Confirms a willing non-Federal sponsor

Request Panel endorsement of the TSP.

Request feedback and guidance on path forward

Request approval to proceed to feasibility level design.

2

Page 3: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Study Authorities List date and blurb of study authority that defines mission

area and scope.

3

Page 4: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Authorized Study Area

4

Insert Map

Page 5: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Problems/Objectives/Constraints Focus on problems that are unique to the study and

show that the study has Federal Interest Clear, measurable objectives Constraints unique to this study/study area

5

Page 6: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Final Array of Alternatives Distinctly different alternatives Risks inherent in each alternative Potential impacts Major qualitative and quantitative metrics used for trade off

analysis

6

Page 7: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Tentatively Selected Plan

Key features of the TSP Trade-offs between benefits, environmental

impacts, costs, policy, legal issues, and sponsor capability that led to selection

7

Page 8: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Significant CommentsATR/IEPR/Policy/ Public

Only discuss SIGNIFICANT comments that have changed the TSP since the TSP milestone or have high risk when moving forward in the study

8

Page 9: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

MSC Quality Assurance MSC confirms that they have done their QA role

throughout the study process ATR and IEPR leads can add input here if they deem it

necessary

9

Page 10: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Sponsor Views

Sponsor may send District a statement to enter here, and this is the time for them to speak of few words of their support of the TSP (whether that is NED or LPP)

10

Page 11: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

HQ Policy Review Recap of significant Policy and Legal Review comments

and recommendations

11

Page 12: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Risk Register Highlights Confirming the TSP

This reflects the Risk Register summary submitted as a read ahead with issues that have not been covered by other slides

Significant Risk Register items added because of review comments that have changed the TSP or are high risks

12

Page 13: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Risk Register Highlights Path Forward for TSP Refinement

Risks being carried forward into feasibility level design

How will the PDT move from TSP to final report / recommendation?

13

Page 14: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Feasibility Level DesignRemaining Funds Available

14

Page 15: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Project Schedule

15

Milestone Date (or Projected Date)

Feasibility Cost Share Agreement Signed

Alternatives Milestone

Tentatively Selected Plan Milestone

Agency Decision Milestone

Civil Works Review Board

Chief’s Report

Page 16: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Applied Lessons Learned Lessons learned from previous studies

Lessons learned during this study

16

Page 17: STUDY TITLE

BUILDING STRONG®

Discussion and

Decision

17