Upload
phiala
View
27
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point . J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting May 09, 2012. outline. Continue from the talk I gave on April 11, 2012 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer
LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting May 09, 2012
Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
OUTLINE
Continue from the talk I gave on April 11, 2012Updated to LCLS-II design distance and also modeled the undulator resistive-wall wakefield effect and by-pass line wakefield effectPros of setting BC1 @ 300 ~ 350 MeV for LCLS-II
More accelerator tubes before BC1: lower the amplitude, avoid any breakdown related problem; more stable simply due to 1/sqrt(2) statistics; …
One concern about the chicane strength (looked into)More knowledge about the stability and tolerance (on-going)
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
LAYOUT: ACCORDING TO LCLS-II MAD DECK
BC1 @ 250 MeV
Set pointsBC1: R56 = 46 mm, Energy 250 MeV, peak current 176 AmpL1S: – 20 degreeL1X: – 160 degree; 19 MeVL2: – 31.4 degreeBC2: R56 = 29 mm, Energy 4.5 GeV, peak current 3 kA
BC24.5 GeV
By-pass13.5 GeV
TCAV3BC1250 MeV
L1S
wirescannerL1X
4 wire-scanners
L2-linac L3-linacDL1135 MeV
L0gun
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
UND
PROFILES
BC1END UNDBEG
CSR, LSC included in LiTrack, good agreement with Elegant [Bosch, Kleman, Wu, PRSTAB, 2008]
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
BC2 CSR AND L3 RF + WAKE
BC2END L3END
CSR, LSC included in LiTrack, good agreement with Elegant [Bosch, Kleman, Wu, PRSTAB, 2008]
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
BY-PASS LINE AND UNDULATOR WAKE
Implement wakefieldUNDENDUNDBEG
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
LAYOUT: HIGHER ENERGY
BC1 @ 335 MeV
Set pointsBC1: R56 = 44.4 mm, Energy 335 MeV, peak current 207 AmpL1S: – 16 degreeL1X: – 160 degree; 30 MeVL2: – 32 degreeBC2: R56 = 27 mm, Energy 4.5 GeV, peak current 3 kA
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
BC24.5 GeV
By-pass13.5 GeV
TCAV3BC1355 MeV
L1S
wirescannerL1X
4 wire-scanners
L2-linac L3-linacDL1135 MeV
L0gun
UND
PROFILES
BC1END UNDBEG
CSR, LSC included in LiTrack, good agreement with Elegant [Bosch, Kleman, Wu, PRSTAB, 2008]
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
BC2 CSR AND L3 RF + WAKE
BC2END L3END
CSR, LSC included in LiTrack, good agreement with Elegant [Bosch, Kleman, Wu, PRSTAB, 2008]
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
BY-PASS LINE AND UNDULATOR WAKE
Implement wakefieldUNDENDUNDBEG
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
REMATCH THE OPTICS
Twiss-function through BC1 @ 335 MeV
EMITTANCE GROWTH
Due to ISR
E = 0.335 GeV; q = 6.43o; LB = 0.2035;DL = 2.44572; ;
Dgex = 5.5E-13 negligible
CSR and Space Charge: reported last time with Impact-T simulation small
25
1
T.O. Raubenheimer
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
BC1 DIPOLE FIELD INTEGRAL
BC1 energy set point to be as high as 350 MeV Assuming the set point range is from 200 MeV to 350 MeVAssuming the BC1 chicane can provide R56 from 15 mm to 65 mm for the above mentioned energy range (200 – 350 MeV)With the same geometry as in CDR
Then the maximum field integral of each dipole is 1.31 kG m (350 MeV and R56 of 65 mm)Details are plotted in the next page
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
BC1 DIPOLE FIELD INTEGRAL
BC1 energy set point: 200 -- 350 MeV BC1 chicane R56: 15 (red curve) – 46 (green curve) – 65 (blue curve) mm
1.31 kG m
1.10 kG m
SETPOINT
Comparison between setting BC1 @ 250 and 335 MeV
Next, look at the jitter and tolerance
BC1 Setpoint
(MeV)
Location R56,1
(mm)
L1S Phase (S-deg)
L1X Phase (X-deg)
L1X Amplitud
e (MV)
L2 Phase (S-deg)
BC2 Setpoint
(GeV)
R56,2
(mm)
250 11-2 46 -20 -160 19 -31.4 4.5 29
335 11-3 44.4 -16 -160 30 -32 4.5 27
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1S PHASE JITTER: UNDBEG CENTROID ENERGY
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1S PHASE JITTER: UNDBEG RESIDUAL ENERGY CHIRP
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1S PHASE JITTER: UNDBEG PEAK CURRENT
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1X PHASE JITTER: UNDBEG CENTROID ENERGY
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1X PHASE JITTER: UNDBEG RESIDUAL ENERGY CHIRP
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1X PHASE JITTER: UNDBEG PEAK CURRENT
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1X AMPLITUDE JITTER: UNDBEG CENTROID ENERGY
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1X AMPLITUDE JITTER: UNDBEG RESIDUAL ENERGY CHIRP
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1X AMPLITUDE JITTER: UNDBEG PEAK CURRENT
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
INJECTOR TIMING JITTER: UNDBEG CENTROID ENERGY
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
INJECTOR TIMING JITTER: UNDBEG RESIDUAL ENERGY CHIRP
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
INJECTOR TIMING JITTER: UNDBEG PEAK CURRENT
335 MeV250 MeV
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
JITTER SENSITIVITIES AND TOLERANCE
250 MeV case from CDR
JITTER SENSITIVITIES AND TOLERANCE
335 MeV case on-going: L1S phase, L1X phase, timing
Jitter source EBC1 (MeV) DE/E0 (%) h0 (1/m) Dh (1/m) DI/I0 (%)
L1S phase (rms 0.06 degree)
250 0.01 10.08 1.88 3.53
335 0.01 -7.18 1.59 1.30
L1X phase (rms 0.50 degree)
250 0.01 10.14 5.44 2.63
335 0.02 -7.18 11.53 5.91
L1X amplitude (rms 0.05
MeV)
250 0.01 10.14 1.79 2.75
335 0.01 -7.18 0.14 1.22
Injector timing
(rms 200 fs)
250 0.02 10.14 0.98 2.92
335 0.01 -7.19 3.54 0.28
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC
L1X PHASE JITTER
BC1@ 335 MeV: UNDBEG
L1X: -160.5o
L1X: -160o
L1X: -159.5o
Linear compression study with optimization for BC1 @ 300 -- 350 MeV up to undulator end
Longitudinal profile up to undulator end Tolerance study: centroid energy, residual energy chirp, peak
current on timing and LINAC phase jitter up to undulator entrance
Looked into BC1 dipole magnet design for BC1 @ 335 MeVo The maximum field integral of each dipole is 1.31 kG m
(350 MeV and R56 of 65 mm) Full machine lattice in Impact code is on going Strong focusing on sec. 11-2 More tolerance study is needed.
DISCUSSION
LCLS-II Accel. Phys. , J. Wu, SLAC