Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Study Overview
NMHC / Kingsley 2014 Package Delivery Study
Respondent pool makeup
0-49 units
50-99 units 7%
100-199 units 24%
200-299 units 30%
300-499 units 30%
500+ units 7%
Garden (1-4
stories) 68%
Mid-rise (5-8
stories) 14%
7%
3%
Other / multiple
types 9% High-rise
(9+ stories)
Townhouse
Strong response counts from across the U.S.
255
228 210
169 147
123 120 119
94 91 82 76 66 61 59 58 52
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Nu
mb
er
of
Re
spo
nse
s
Most communities accept packages on behalf of residents
94%
89%
82%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mid-rise Garden High-rise
Yes 88%
No 12%
Does your management office accept packages?
Growth in package volume most wide spread in TX markets
73% 72% 71% 70%
64% 64% 63% 62% 62% 61% 60% 60% 60% 60% 59%
49% 48%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
What Happens to Packages
Mid-rise and high-rise management staff deliver packages
55%
39%
29%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Mid-rise High-rise Garden
Re
gula
rly
or
Occ
asio
nal
ly
6%
27%
Rarely 35%
No 31%
Regularly
Occasionally
Does management staff deliver packages to the residents' doors?
Few carriers deliver to residents’ door in high-rise buildings
86%
52%
20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Garden Mid-rise High-rise
Yes 77%
Do package carriers deliver to the residents' doors?
73%
16%
70%
20%
56%
26%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Deliver tomanagement
office
Leave package atdoor
Garden Mid-rise High-rise
When carrier attempts to deliver, but resident is not home…
19%
70%
5%
Deliver to management office
Deliver to package locker
Return package back to carrier hub
Leave package at door
Security of packages left at door main concern of residents
67%
7%
34%
68%
14%
32%
58%
18%
35%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
...the security of having apackage left at their door.
...package carriers beinggiven access to the building.
...packages being deliveredto the wrong apartment.
Residents are concerned about…
Garden Mid-rise High-rise
Carriers alert residents directly one-third of the time
6%
18%
24%
26%
26%
33%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Management office delivers packages
Paper notice on resident door
Electronic check-in system
Text or email to the resident
Phone call
Carrier notifies residents
Automated notification least likely at garden communities
15%
45%
57%
45% 43%
35%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Garden Mid-rise High-rise
Automated System Any Manual Methods
Holiday vs. Non-Holiday
Staff time dedicated to packages increases during holidays
101
325
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Non-Holiday Holiday
Receive Over 300 Packages
78% 63%
14%
19%
8% 18%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Non-holiday Holiday
Staff Hours
1-5 hours 6-10 hours 11+ hours
High-rise communities more likely to spend 11+ hours on packages
30%
16%
5%
46%
32%
13%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
High-rise Mid-rise Garden
Percent of Communities Spending 11+ Hours per Week on Packages
Non-Holiday Holiday
Holiday package increase is greatest at garden communities
84%
60%
41% 38% 44%
36%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Garden Mid-rise High-rise
Percent Change in Package Volume and Staff Hours During Holiday Periods
Garden Mid-rise High-rise
% CHG Volume
% CHG Staff Hours
% CHG Volume
% CHG Staff Hours
% CHG Volume
% CHG Staff Hours
Burden on staff greatest for medium-sized communities
8.8
14.6 17.4
20.7 19.1 16.7
12.5
21.8
29.9
34.9 33.2
24.3
0
10
20
30
40
0-49 units 50-99 units 100-199units
200-299units
300-499units
500+ units
Ratio of Packages to Staff Members
Non-holiday Holiday
Ratio of packages to staff nearly doubles for garden
32.4 29.8
14.4
45.5 47.6
26.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
High-rise Mid-rise Garden
Non-holiday Holiday
Technology Adoption
Garden communities most likely to have package lockers
10%
7%
2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
Garden Mid-rise High-rise
Yes 9%
No 84%
7%
Considering it
Does your community currently utilize package lockers?
Package management software more common than lockers
61%
47%
17%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
High-rise Mid-rise Garden
Yes 24%
No 70%
6%
Considering it
Does your community currently utilize package management software?
Most communities have fewer than 11 package lockers
27%
37% 36%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
5 or fewer Between 6and 10
More than11
Number of Individual Package Lockers
45%
24%
31%
Package Locker Capacity
Sufficient year-round
Not during high-volume
periods
Not sufficient
Less than half say package lockers are sufficient year-round
43%
42%
44%
35%
22%
22%
22%
37%
33%
11+
Between 6 and 10
5 or fewer
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Sufficient year-round Yes, but not during high-volume periods No
Nu
mb
er
of
Pac
kage
Lo
cke
rs