22
EXPRESSION OF INTEREST A proposal responding to perception for the City of Wyndham’s ‘Freeway Art Project’ Nicholas Moloney + Keli Murray + Joel Polychronopoulus

Studio Air Final Presentation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

studio, air, final presentations

Citation preview

Page 1: Studio Air Final Presentation

EXPRESSION OF INTEREST

A proposal responding to perception for the City of Wyndham’s ‘Freeway Art Project’

Nicholas Moloney + Keli Murray + Joel Polychronopoulus

Page 2: Studio Air Final Presentation

PERCEPTION + RESPONSE

TECHNIQUE FOR CONSIDERATION

‘Inspire and enrich municipality’

Experiential longevity

Defines Wyndham geographically and culturally

Interacting with the landscape and drivers

Direct and control incoming light

Displaying shadows on road

Page 3: Studio Air Final Presentation

PRECEDENTS

BKK PAVILIONBKK ARCHITECTS

UNIVERSITY OF PORTOCONSTRUCTIVE GEOMETRY PAVILION

Page 4: Studio Air Final Presentation

PRECEDENTS

A20 INSTALLATIONJONATHAN GRINHAM

FAULDER’S STUDIOMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART PROPOSAL

Page 5: Studio Air Final Presentation

DECONSTRUCTING THE BKK PAVILION

DESIGN PROCESS

Geodesic sphere Dodecahedron Extruded geodesic dodecahedron

Form-making cubes BKK replica

Page 6: Studio Air Final Presentation

DESIGN PROCESS: MATRIX

MATRIX SELECTION CRITERIA:Applying different skins to surfaces

Skins that resulted in distinctive shadow pat-terns

Hexagonal grid

Page 7: Studio Air Final Presentation

MID-SEMESTER DESIGN PROPOSAL

Three curves to create surface

Lofted curves Hexagonal grid on surface

Smaller scaled in-ternal hexagons

Lofted between external and internal skins to create extrusions

Page 8: Studio Air Final Presentation

MID-SEMESTER DESIGN PROPOSAL

Page 9: Studio Air Final Presentation

MID-SEMESTER CRIT REVIEW

WHERE TO FROM NOW?

Issues:

Good technique but lack of design intention

Not site specific

Lack of meaning

Directions to explore:

Exploration of interaction through non-visual means

Meaningful and immediate reaction to drivers

Passively based reaction

Page 10: Studio Air Final Presentation

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:PRECEDENTS

ACOUSTIC WIND PAVILIONLUKE JERRAM

‘WALK THE LINE’CINIMOD STUDIO

Page 11: Studio Air Final Presentation

Whistle from PVC pipe Study of TKE

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT: RESEARCH

Basic priniciple

Page 12: Studio Air Final Presentation

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

Form progression from road

Form progression from embankment

Individual cell progression

Page 13: Studio Air Final Presentation

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT: WIND BELT

Page 14: Studio Air Final Presentation

PROPOSAL ON SITE

Page 15: Studio Air Final Presentation

DESIGN PROPOSAL

Elevation road side

Elevation embankment side Elevation of side

Perspective road side Perspective embankment side

Page 16: Studio Air Final Presentation
Page 17: Studio Air Final Presentation
Page 18: Studio Air Final Presentation
Page 19: Studio Air Final Presentation
Page 20: Studio Air Final Presentation
Page 21: Studio Air Final Presentation

COMPETITION PANEL

Page 22: Studio Air Final Presentation

REFERENCES:

Grozdanic, Lidjia, ‘Aeolus – Acoustic Wind Pavilion’,Luke Jerram, Evolo, http://www.evolo.us/architecture/aeolus-acoustic-wind-pavil- ion-luke-jerram/

Faulders Studio, ‘Moca@lbc’, http://faulders-studio.com/proj_ moca.html

Sial Projects, RMIT University, ‘BKK pavilion’, http://www.sial. rmit.edu.au/Projects/Pavilions_for_New_Architecture.php

SuckerPunch Daily, ‘University of Porto Constructive Geometry Pavilion’, Constructive Geometry, http://www.sucker- punchdaily.com/tag/university-of-porto/