Upload
lynn-blankenship
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
STSci Nov 28 2007
(Tracey) Jane Turner
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
X-ray Spectroscopy of local AGN: what is really coming from the inner disk?
Principal Collaborators:
Lance Miller (Oxford)James Reeves (Keele)Steve Kraemer (CUA)
Recap - what is an active galactic nucleus
Review - what we can learn about the inner regions of AGN using X-ray data?
Set the scene - what models have developed based on X-ray data?
New - what are the hot new developments and how are they changing our picture?
Summary - what are the open questions?
Outline
QuickTime™ and aH.263 decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Credit: NASA
Black Holes that are switched on are “active”
Few % of galaxies - black hole is actively accreting material - releases large amount of energy over broad frequency band, from small region -nucleus - these powerful emitters called active galactic nuclei (AGN)
Peterson “An Introduction to Active Galactic Nuclei” Measurements of gas &
stellar kinematics show most/all nucleated galaxies harbor black hole at center (Kormendy & Richstone ‘95, Magorrian et al ‘98, Gebhardt et al 2000)
BH mass scales with galaxy bulge mass so formation linked, although unclear how. Many of these BHs “switched off”
The Power behind AGN
Simple arguments support that AGN must be powered by accretion on to supermassive black holes
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
–Eddington limit requires self gravity exceeds radiation pressure giving M > 106 M¤
–Accreting material has angular momentum -forms accretion disk that radiates as gravitational p.e. lost, only way to get enough luminosity from such a small region
–Accretion disk around a 106 – 108 M¤ black hole emits thermal spectrum - peaks in UV band in agreement with observations
UV photons from inner disk Inverse Compton scatter off relativistic electrons in corona
Thermal Comptonization -> hard X-rays
Copious production of X-Rays
Some X-rays shine back onto disk producing a “reflection spectrum”
Continuum + reflection pass thro’ ionized circumnuclear gas (the “warm absorber”) - that imprints further absorption & emission features on observed spectrum
X-ray Line Production Photoelectric absorption
(energy dependent) photons are re-emitted via fluorescence or destroyed by Auger de-excitation
Emission lines & absorption edges result
Fe K most prominent due to
combination of abundance & fluorescence-yield
Consider X-rays illuminating optically-thick, cold accn disk
George & Fabian ‘91
X-ray Line ProductionGeorge & Fabian ‘91, Reynolds 1996
Compton Scattering - hard photons scatter with Compton recoil reducing scattered flux above 15 keV
Line energy (6.4-6.97 keV), fluorescence yield depend on ionization
Ross & Fabian 2006
X-ray Absorption Line Production
Kaspi et al 2002
Compton thin material produces narrow absorption & emission lines - detection depends on our view of gas geometry
(Fabian, 2006, AN, 327, 943)
Compton scattering
hump
Iron K Line X-ray
Continuum
Absorption from outflow
Thermal Disk Emission?
SuzakuChandra/XMM
What are we hoping to LEARN from X-ray studies of AGN?
Ultimately we hope to understand something fundamental:
- physics in the strong gravity regime Fe KFe K from disk from disk
- black hole accretion/fueling (and hence growth, evolution, structure formation) trace gas near BH -trace gas near BH - Warm Warm AbsorberAbsorber
How do we get from X-ray data to the physics?
Fe K/Reflection
Profile distorted SR & GR - probe of inner disk/BH
Fe K/Reflection
Profile distorted SR & GR - probe of inner disk/BH
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
GR Effects on Spectral features
Profile distorted SR & GR - probe of inner disk/BH
Also see GR blurring of absorption features
Line energies, widths, strengths and variability can also tell us about the accretion flow and feedback (disk winds etc)
Smeared absorber - Gierlinski & Done 2004
Distorted Fe K profiles apparently observed in ASCA data for most nearby AGN
sample
6 754 8
Fe K/Reflection
(Nandra et al 1997)
(eg. Fabian et al 1994, Tanaka et al 1995)
“Red wing”
MCG-6-30-15: Poster Child
Energy (keV)
Fe K
“Red wing”
Tanaka et al. 1995, Wilms et al 2000 and many more…
… -but line variability, peak energy and inferred disk inclinations did not match expectations
What about X-ray spectral variability
Ummm….but disk derived inclinations don’t match other indicators
Spectral variability not as predicted
Broad disk line does not vary correlated with continuum
Mkn 766 Miller et al 2007
Seyfert Spectral Variability Behavior
QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Absorption or Reflection as the origin of the AGN continuum shape?
Ionized ReflectionSmeared Absorption?
Ballantyne et al 2004, Ross & Fabian 2006Gierlinski & Done 2004
Light bending?
Miniutti & Fabian (2004) suggest continuum source height varies, when contm produced close to disk gravity bends light onto accretion disk, reducing continuum flux while enhancing reflection features
Iron line does not respond to continuum
Suzaku lightcurve
Light Bending
High Resolution Grating Spectroscopy
NGC 3783 HETG (Yaqoob et al 2005) red & black - different observations
-Fe line FWHM ∼1700 km/s -Implies emitting gas ~ 70 lt-day from continuum-Also Kaspi et al 2002, Netzer et al 2003
Provided Progress: Narrow features resolved - separation of absorption layers & narrow emission components…
Iron K-shell Absorption in Seyfert 1s.
NGC 1365/XMM, (Risaliti et al. 2005)NGC 3783, XMM, Reeves et al. (2004)
Ambiguity: - X-ray Absorption
Reeves et al 2004
Large columns (> 1023 cm-2) of high- gas first suggested from ionized edges in Ginga data (Nandra & Pounds 1994)
Chandra/XMM confirm importance of such gas by detection of narrow absorption lines
Can reduce implied broad red wing (Kinkhabwala 2003)…..
To understand Fe K profiles this gas needs to be accounted for…
NGC 3783
NGC 3516 Turner et al 2005
Ambiguity: - X-ray Absorption
Reeves et al 2004
NGC 3783
NGC 3516 Turner et al 2005
Complex & Variable Absorption Components log ~3.5 - 5, NH >> 1023 cm-2 -can we model all curvature with these?
`alternate’ (to diskline) absorption models are not arbitrarily complex (e.g. NGC 3516, Turner et al 2005)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Counter claims: Young et al (2005) say cannot thus “explain away” diskline in MCG-6-30-15 strong features ~6.5 keV, not observed
Counter-counter claims: L. Miller et al (2008) say MCG-6 explained without recourse to blurring
HETG, Young et al 2005
Kallman et al 2004 NH~ 3x 1023 cm-2, log =2.25
Chandra/XMM NGC 3516 (Turner et al, submitted Oct 2007)
Highly variable light curve and the usual hardening at low flux levels
A highly ionized outflow in NGC 3516 (Turner et al. 2007, in prep)
Numerous absorption lines, strong (100 eV, EW) lines near 6.7, 6.97 keV rest frame, Fe XXV, XXVI 1s-2p
NH >5x1023 cm-2 vturb=3000 kms-1
More Evidence for ionized outflows:NGC 3516 (Turner et al. 2007, submitted)
P-Cygni profile from Fe XXVI. Velocity shift ~2000 km/s
Neutral Fe K width ~3000 kms-1
Observed frame and energies at 6.64, 6.92 (0.02 keV) rules out local (z=0) origin, e.g. WHIM
Neutral Fe K
Fe XXVI
Fe XXVChandra/HEG
A highly ionized outflow in NGC 3516 (Turner et al. 2007, in prep)
Spectral variability due to changes in covering fraction of intermediate- layer
37%-60%
ALSO explains flux variability
Deep dip is an eclipse event !
2006
Occultation in MCG-6-30-15
Deep dip is an eclipse event !
McKernan & Yaqoob 1998 Occultation by optically-thick cloud explains flux and spectral variability in target low state, including Fe emission line
Can imagine continuum being covered by clouds that don’t cover all the sky, or by an uneven edge of the accretion disk…..the partial-covering absorber idea (Holt et al 1980)
Partial Covering/Occultation, resurgence of an old idea
A disk wind? Columns being seen now include Compton-thick blobs so must see some reflection
Always an appealing alternative to disk reflection, to explain general shapes of AGN spectra and big flux variations (e.g. Boller et al 1997, 2002)
Explains some Galactic black holes (e.g. Dower, Bradt, Morgan 1982, Brandt et al 1996, Tanaka, Ueda and Boller 2003)
Partial Covering/Occultation, resurgence of an old idea
Gierlinski & Done 2004 Turner et al 2007
The idea resurfaced with a vengeance because of the complex absorbers revealed by new data
Grating spectroscopy points specifically to a wind origin for the gas
Outflows in AGN
(Outflow Schematic; Elvis 2000)
Outflows (in the form of warm absorbers) are seen in the majority of nearby AGN.
Typically velocities ( from a few 100 km/s to a 1000 km/s, which could carry a few solar masses per year (out to pc scales).
In some higher luminosity AGN strong blue-shifted Fe K absorption features are seen above 7 keV - possible high v outflows at v~0.1c
Outflows can carry significant Kinetic power
Can provide feedback between BH/bulge mass in galaxy.
Black holes accreting at Eddington or above can produce winds that are optically thick within <100Rg (King & Pounds 2003).
Alternative is magnetic field driving (Kato et al. 2002).
Wind Parameters
Middleton, Done, Gierlinski 2007 from XMM obsns PG QSOs and NLSy1s
Are absorbers the only way to get diagnostics from the strong gravity regime?
Fe K fluxcontinuum flux
Intrinsic link or occultation? Either way, line must originate very close to BH
Mkn 766 - Miller et al 2006
Maybe not- broad ionized iron emission line is responding to continuum! 6.7
keV
lin
e
flux
continuum
Fe line/continuum correlated to ~10 ks
Obs
erve
d E
nerg
y /k
eVS/N
6
8
4
Mkn 766 (Turner et al 2006)
Also, line energy varies, tentative period ~165 ks
Orbital Doppler shifts at ~100 rg los velocity ~13,500 km/s
Obs
erve
d E
nerg
y /k
eVS/N
6
8
4
Mkn 766 (Turner et al 2006)
MBH> 5x105M exists within 3.6 x1013cm
€
ΔEE
≈vorbsinθc
≈ sinθrgr
€
torb ≈r
9rg ⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
3
2
M 8
Disk may be best ‘diagnosed’ in Seyfert high-states
Rapid (tens of ks) flux/energy variability - must be diagnostics of gas very close to BH
Also…new phenomenon discovered
Narrow Fe emission lines, shifted from rest-energy (Doppler/GR)
HEGHEG
- High - Low
NGC 3516
Mrk 766 Turner et al 2004
NGC 3516 First obsn in an AGN - NGC 3516 (Turner et al 2002)
Emission from disk hotspots integrated over partial orbits at tens-hundreds of rg ? (Turner et al 2002)
Spallation- destruction of Fe enhances Cr & Mn - (Skibo 1997) - line ratios wrong
Precessing jet (cf SS433) - but line widths wrong
Must be Fe, shifted by relativistic effects - diskline/disk wind scenarios?
Conclusions• Large columns of highly ionized gas common in AGN• High velocities detected indicate these are outflows -disk winds?• Outflows explain much of curvature in X-ray spectra - need to
seriously revise out idea about Fe K profiles • Feedback can be studied by estimating more outflow rates etc• Evidence for Compton-thick gas, some reflection must be
present too• Variations in covering fraction can explain spectral/flux variability• Rapidly varying absorption/emission implies gas at small radii (few
rg) so in principal can still study GR
• Current challenge - obtain enough suitable data to better constrain the complex absorber systems and get to the big science questions