55
1 Structures and Strategies for State Space Search 3 3.0 Introduction 3.1 Graph Theory 3.2 Strategies for State Space Search 3.3 Using the State Space to Represent Reasoning with the Predicate Calculus 3.4 Epilogue and References 3.5 Exercises Additional references for the slides: Russell and Norvig’s AI book. Robert Wilensky’s CS188 slides: www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wilensky/cs188/lectures/index. html

Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

3. Structures and Strategies for State Space Search. 3.0Introduction 3.1Graph Theory 3.2Strategies for State Space Search 3.3Using the State Space to Represent Reasoning with the Predicate Calculus. 3.4Epilogue and References 3.5Exercises. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

1

Structures and Strategies for State Space Search 3

3.0 Introduction

3.1 Graph Theory

3.2 Strategies for State Space Search

3.3 Using the State Space to

Represent Reasoningwith the PredicateCalculus

3.4 Epilogue and References

3.5 Exercises

Additional references for the slides:

Russell and Norvig’s AI book.

Robert Wilensky’s CS188 slides: www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wilensky/cs188/lectures/index.html

Page 2: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

2

Chapter Objectives

• Learn the basics of state space representation

• Learn the basics of search in state space

• The agent model: Has a problem, searches for a solution.

Page 3: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

3

Graph theory: The city of Königsberg

The city is divided by a river. There are two islands at the river. The first island is connected by two bridges to both riverbanks and is also connected by a bridge to the other island. The second island two bridges each connecting to one riverbank.

Question: Is there a walk around the city that crosses each bridge exactly once?

Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler invented graph theory to solve this problem.

Page 4: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

4

The city of Königsberg

Page 5: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

5

Graph of the Königsberg bridge system

Page 6: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

6

Definition of a graph

A graph consists of

• A set of nodes (can be infinite)

• A set of arcs that connect pairs of nodes.

An arc is an ordered pair, e.g.,(i1, rb1),(rb1, i1).

Page 7: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

7

A labeled directed graph

Page 8: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

8

A rooted tree, exemplifying family relationships

Page 9: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

9

Definition of a graph (cont’d)

A graph consists of nodes and arcs.

If a directed arc connects N and M, N is called the parent, and M is called the child. If N is also connected to K, M and K are siblings.

A rooted tree has a unique node which has no parents. The edges in a rooted tree are directed away from the root. Each node in a rooted tree has a unique parent.

Page 10: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

10

Definition of a graph (cont’d)

A leaf or tip node is a node that has no children (sometimes also called a dead end).

A path of length n is an ordered sequence of n+1 nodes such that the graph contains arcs from each node to the following ones.

E.g., [a b e] is a path of length 2.

On a path in a rooted graph, a node is said to be an ancestor of all the nodes positioned after it (to its right), as well as a descendant of all nodes before it (to its left).

Page 11: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

11

Definition of a graph (cont’d)

A path that contains any node more than once is said to contain a cycle or loop.

A tree is a graph in which there is a unique path between every pair of nodes.

Two nodes are said to be connected if a path exists that includes them both.

Page 12: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

12

A unifying view (Newell and Simon)

The problem space consists of:

• a state space which is a set of states representing the possible configurations of the world

• a set of operators which can change one state into another

The problem space can be viewed as a graph where the states are the nodes and the arcs represent the operators.

Page 13: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

13

Searching on a graph (simplified)

Start with the initial state (root)

Loop until goal found

find the nodes accessible from the root

Page 14: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

14

1 4 3

7 6

5 8 2

1 4 3

7 6 2

5 8

Page 15: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

15

State space of the 8-puzzle generated by “move blank” operations

Page 16: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

16

State space search

Represented by a four-tuple [N,A,S,GD], where:

• N is the problem space

• A is the set of arcs (or links) between nodes. These correspond to the operators.

• S is a nonempty subset of N. It represents the start state(s) of the problem.

• GD is a nonempty subset of N. It represents the goal state(s) of the problem. The states in GD are described using either:

a measurable property of the statesa property of the path developed in thesearch (a solution path is a path from node S to a node in GD )

Page 17: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

17

The 8-puzzle problem as state space search

• states: possible board positions

• operators: one for sliding each square in each of four directions,or, better, one for moving the blank square in each of four directions

• initial state: some given board position

• goal state: some given board position

Note: the “solution” is not interesting here, we need the path.

Page 18: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

18

State space of the 8-puzzle (repeated)

Page 19: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

19

Traveling salesperson problem as state space search

The salesperson has n cities to visit and must then return home. Find the shortest path to travel.

• state space:

• operators:

• initial state:

• goal state:

Page 20: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

20

An instance of the traveling salesperson problem

Page 21: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

21

Search of the traveling salesperson problem. (arc label = cost from root)

Page 22: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

22

Nearest neighbor path

Nearest neighbor path = AEDBCA (550)

Minimal cost path = ABCDEA (375)

Page 23: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

23

Tic-tac-toe as state space search

• states:

• operators:

• initial state:

• goal state:

Note: this is a “two-player” game

Page 24: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

24

Goal-directed search

Page 25: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

25

Data-directed search

Page 26: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

26

Page 27: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

27

Trace of backtracking search (Fig. 3.12)

Page 28: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

28

A trace of backtrack on the graph of Fig. 3.12

Page 29: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

29

Graph for BFS and DFS (Fig. 3.13)

Page 30: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

30

Breadth_first search algorithm

Page 31: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

31

Trace of BFS on the graph of Fig. 3.13

Page 32: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

32

Graph of Fig. 3.13 at iteration 6 of BFS

Page 33: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

33

Depth_first_search algorithm

Page 34: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

34

Trace of DFS on the graph of Fig. 3.13

Page 35: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

35

Graph of Fig. 3.13 at iteration 6 of DFS

Page 36: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

36

BFS, label = order state was removed from OPEN

Page 37: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

37

DFS with a depth bound of 5, label = order state was removed from OPEN

Page 38: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

38

State space graph of a set of implications in propositional calculus

Page 39: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

39

And/or graph of the expression qrp

Page 40: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

40

Hypergraph

A hypergraph consists of:

N: a set of nodes.

H: a set of hyperarcs.

Hyperarcs are defined by ordered pairs in which the first element of the pairs is a single node from N and the second element is a subset of N.

An ordinary graph is a special case of hypergraph in which all the sets of descendant nodes have a cardinality of 1.

Page 41: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

41

And/or graph of the expression qrp

Page 42: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

42

And/or graph of a set of propositional calculus expressions

Page 43: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search
Page 44: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

44

And/or graph of the part of the state space for integrating a function (Nilsson 1971)

Page 45: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

45

The solution subgraph showing that fred is at the museum

Page 46: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

46

Facts and rules for the example

Page 47: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

47

Five rules for a simple subset of English grammar

Page 48: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

48

Figure 3.25: And/or graph for the grammar of Example 3.3.6. Some of the nodes (np, art, etc.) have been written more than once to simplify drawing the graph.

Page 49: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

49

Parse tree for the sentence

Page 50: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

50

“Blind search”

BFS and DFS are blind in the sense that they have no knowledge about the problem at all other than the problem space

Such techniques are also called brute-force search, uninformed search, or weak methods

Obviously, we can’t expect too much from these, but they provide

Worst-case scenarios

A basis for more interesting algorithms later on

Page 51: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

51

BFS and DFS

Worst case scenarios are equally bad (exponential)

How to evaluate search algorithms Completeness: a search algorithm is complete if it is

guaranteed to find a solution when one exists

Quality of solution: usually the path cost

Time cost of finding the solution: usually in terms of number of nodes generated or examined

Memory cost of finding the solution: how many nodes do we have to keep around during the search

Page 52: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

52

Evaluating BFS

• Complete? Yes

• Optimal quality solution?Yes

• Time required in the worst caseO(bd)

• Memory required in the worst case (in OPEN)O(bd)

where b is the branching factor, d is the depth of the solution

Page 53: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

53

Evaluating DFS

• Complete? Yes (only if the tree is finite)

• Optimal quality solution?No

• Time required in the worst caseO(bm)

• Memory required in the worst case (in OPEN)O(bm)

where b is the branching factor, m is the maximum depth of the tree

Page 54: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

54

Example search problems

Puzzles: missionaries and cannibals, cryptarithmetic, 8-puzzle, 15-puzzle, Rubik’s cube, n-queens, the Tower of Hanoi, …

2-player games: chess, checkers, Chinese Go, …

Proving theorems in logic and geometry

Path finding

“Industrial” problems: VLSI layout design, assembling a complex object

“AI problems”: speech recognition, planning, …

Page 55: Structures and Strategies for State Space Search

55

The importance of the problem space

The choice of a problem space makes a big difference

in fact, finding a good abstraction is half of the problem

Intelligence is needed to figure out what problem space to use

still poorly understood: the human problem solver is conducting a search in the space of problem spaces