Structured Participation Toolkit for Collaborative Problem-Solving CyberGIS Implementation Considerations Mary Roderick, Timothy Nyerges, Michalis Avraam

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Structured Participation Toolkit for Collaborative Problem-Solving CyberGIS Implementation Considerations Mary Roderick, Timothy Nyerges, Michalis Avraam University of Washington August 7th, 2012
  • Slide 2
  • Example: Create maps and share via link GIS as (social) media (Sui and Goodchild 2011)
  • Slide 3
  • Example: Create maps and share via a range of social media outlets
  • Slide 4
  • Example: Create special interest groups, comment and rate maps
  • Slide 5
  • Example: Add twitter feed to keep map users up to date
  • Slide 6
  • Discussion Brainstorm Prioritize Synthesize PGIST & CyberGIS: Integrated analytic-deliberative environment
  • Slide 7
  • 6 Structured Participation Toolkit Goals Large-scale, asynchronous participation Structured analytic-deliberation Consensus-building & decision-making Open, transparent decision repository Participation metrics for reporting INTELLIGENCE DESIGN CHOICE REFLECTION
  • Slide 8
  • PGIST Challenge Monolithic web application Local client-server architecture Technology specific Monolithic web application Local client-server architecture Technology specific X Web Services? No, much of the functionality is in the GUI. Need a Pluggable GUI Framework that can support cross-domain and cross-platform communication. Processing and persistence layers are hosted, similar to SOA. Pluggable functionality Remote client-server architecture Technology independent Pluggable functionality Remote client-server architecture Technology independent How can the CyberGIS Gateway be expanded to support collaborative problem solving? VS.
  • Slide 9
  • PGIST & CyberGISfrom Coupling to Hybrid NowFuture IFrame, separate browser windowEmbedded GUI widgets in Gateway SSO via Token ServiceDelegated security Dual user managementDelegated user management Transfer of application controlDelegated application control Application context aware
  • Slide 10
  • 9 SPT Solution JSOPJSOP JavaScript Object Notation Padded Server response injected in the Doesnt violate browser security.
  • Slide 11
  • 10 SPT Proof of Concept var keywordStore = Ext.create('Ext.data.Store', { id: 'keywordStore', model: 'Keywords', proxy: { type: 'jsonp', }} var feedbackText = form.findField('feedbackTextArea').getValue(); keywordStore.getProxy().url = 'http://localhost:8080/dwr/jsonp/BCTAgent/prepareConcern/' + feedbackText; keywordStore.load(function(records, operation, success) { var checkboxconfigs = []; for ( var i = 0; i < records.length; i++) { for(var j = 0; j < records[i].data.tags.length; j++){ checkboxconfigs.push({ name : records[i].data.tags[j], inputValue : records[i].data.tags[j], boxLabel : records[i].data.tags[j], xtype : 'checkbox' } var keywordStore = Ext.create('Ext.data.Store', { id: 'keywordStore', model: 'Keywords', proxy: { type: 'jsonp', }} var feedbackText = form.findField('feedbackTextArea').getValue(); keywordStore.getProxy().url = 'http://localhost:8080/dwr/jsonp/BCTAgent/prepareConcern/' + feedbackText; keywordStore.load(function(records, operation, success) { var checkboxconfigs = []; for ( var i = 0; i < records.length; i++) { for(var j = 0; j < records[i].data.tags.length; j++){ checkboxconfigs.push({ name : records[i].data.tags[j], inputValue : records[i].data.tags[j], boxLabel : records[i].data.tags[j], xtype : 'checkbox' } Simple HTML page, with link to Ext JS4 file Client data model & store Dynamic GUI generation Remote server invocation
  • Slide 12
  • Identify SPT capabilities from PGIST web applications Determine which functionality to bundle as ExtJS 4 GUI widgets Integration of SPT into CyberGIS Gateway Runtime configuration and deployment of participation workflow 11 Next Steps Support the development and evaluation of "Capabilities for Science of CyberGIS and Science with CyberGIS.
  • Slide 13
  • LIT research supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. EIA 0325916, funded through the Information Technology Research Program, and managed in the Digital Government Program. VCC Research funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Climate Program Office, Sectoral Applications Research Program #NA07OAR4310410. CyberGIS Research funded by the National Science Foundation Grant No. OCI-1047916 Office of Cyberinfrastructure, Software Institutes, Cross-Directorate Active Programs, Geography and Spatial Sciences, and Method, Measure & Statistics Programs. Results and opinions are those of the presenters not the funding programs. 12 Acknowledgements