Upload
hieu
View
52
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Structure of the exotic heavy mesons. arXiv:1206.4877. Makoto Takizawa (Showa Pharmaceutical Univ.) Collaborators Sachiko Takeuchi (Japan College of Social Work) Kiyotaka Shimizu (Sophia University). Heavy Quark Hadrons at J-PARC, Tokyo Institute of Technology, June 22, 2012 . Contents. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Structure of the exotic heavy mesons
Makoto Takizawa (Showa Pharmaceutical Univ.)
CollaboratorsSachiko Takeuchi (Japan College of Social Work)Kiyotaka Shimizu (Sophia University)
Heavy Quark Hadrons at J-PARC, Tokyo Institute of Technology, June 22, 2012
arXiv:1206.4877
Contents
• X(3872): experimental status -> Prof. Olsen’s talk
• X(3872): How exotic X(3872) is? • Structure of the X(3872):
Charmonium- hadronic molecule hybrid• Zb1 and Zb2
• Consistency between X(3872) and Zb
X(3872): experimental status• First observation: 2003, Belle, KEKB
Mass: (3871.57 ± 0.25) MeV (PDG 2011) 0.16 MeV below D0 D*0-bar thresold 3871.73MeV PDG2012 (3871.68 ± 0.17) MeVCharged B decays: (3871.4 ± 0.6 ± 0.1 ) MeV (BABAR)Neutral B decays: : (3868.7 ± 1.5 ± 0.4 ) MeV (BABAR)B decays: (3871.85 ± 0.27 ± 0.19 ) MeV (Belle)p pbar collisions: (3871.61 ± 0.16 ± 0.19 ) MeV (CDF)p p collisions: (3871.95 ± 0.48 ± 0.12 ) MeV (LHCB)
• Width: less than 1.2 MeV • Quantum Number: JPC = 1++ , 2-+ ?
B+ → K+ + J/ψ + ππ(π)
• B+ → X(3872) + K+ → J/ψ + vector meson →π’s
11 Sep 2010 jps fall meeting @ 九州工業大学
X(3872) : How exotic X(3872) is?
1. Not CCbar
Estimated energy of 2 3P1 c c-bar state by the potential model is 3950 MeV, which is about 80 MeV higher than the observed mass of X(3872).
2. Large isospin symmetry breakingIf X(3872) is c c-bar state, it is isoscalar.X(3872) → ρ0 J/ψ → π+ π- J/ψ : isovectorThis decay means large isospin breaking.
• (0.8 ± 0.3) by BABAR• Isovector component is smaller than
isoscalar component : 10~30%
• Estimation of isospin component from this value is an issue of the discussion
3. Not D0 D*0-bar Molecule
• D0 D*0-bar is 50% isovector and 50% isoscalar: Too big the isovector component
• Why are there no charged X(3872)?D+ D*0-bar, D0 D*- molecules
• The production rate of such molecular-like state may be too small.
Charmonium D0 D*0-bar, D+ D*- molecule hybrid
• Structure of X(3872): c c-bar core state (charmonium) is coupling to D0 D*0-bar and D+ D*- states
• Effect of the isospin symmetry breaking is introduced by the mass differences between neutral and charged D, D* mesons
Coupling between C C-bar core and D0 D*0-bar, D+ D*-
c c-bar core D*0-bar
D0 D+
D*-
+ . . . . .
Coupling between C C-bar core, D0 D*0-bar and D+ D*-
• cc-bar core state:• D0 D*0-bar state :
• D+ D*- state : in the center of mass frameq is the conjugate momentum of the relative coordinate
Coupling between C C-bar core, D0 D*0-bar and D+ D*-
• Charge conjugation + state is assumed• Interaction: Isospin symmetric
Coupling between C C-bar core, D0 D*0-bar and D+ D*-
• X(3872) is a mixed state:
• Isospin base:
Isospin symmetric case: c2 = c3 No isovector component
Coupling between C C-bar core, D0 D*0-bar and D+ D*-
• Schroedinger Equation
Numerical results: Mass
• Mass of the cc-bar core: 3.95 GeVfrom S. Godfrey, N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 189.
• Cutoff: 0.3GeV and 0.5 GeV
Lambda = 0.5 GeV, Calculated bound state energy is 3.87157 GeV with coupling strength g = 0.05115 Lambda = 0.3 GeV, Calculated bound state energy is 3.87157 GeV with coupling strength g = 0.05440
Numerical results: Wavefunction• Lambda = 0.5 GeV, B.E. = 0.16 MeV
• Lambda = 0.3 GeV
• Large isospin symmetry breaking• Cutoff dependence is small
Why so large isospin symmetry breaking?• mD0 + mD*0 = 3871.73 MeV
• mD+ + mD*- = 3879.79 ± 0.37 MeV
• mX = 3871.57 MeV
• Binding EnergyNeutral D case: 0.16 MeVCharged D case: 8.22 MeV
Large difference
Numerical results: Wavefunction• Lambda = 0.5 GeV, B.E. = 0.16 MeV
Case of mx = 3868.7 MeV from Neutral B decay data
• Lambda = 0.5 GeV, B.E. = 3.03 MeV
Lambda = 0.5 GeV, B.E. = 3.03 MeV
Energy spectrum• We consider c c-bar core state is
produced in the production process• Transition strength S(E):
B
K
E=Energy transfer
X(3872)
Numerical results: Energy spectrum• Lambda = 0.3 GeV, B.E. = 0.16 MeV
X(3872) bound state
CC-bar state
Numerical results: Energy spectrum• Lambda = 0.5 GeV, B.E. = 0.16 MeV
X(3872) bound state
CC-bar state disappears
Interaction between D and D*
c c-bar core D*0-bar
D0 D+
D*-
+ . . . . .
c c-bar core
Interaction between D0 and D*0bar, D+ and D*-
• Interaction:
Numerical results:
• Mass of the cc-bar core: 3.95 GeVfrom S. Godfrey, N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 189.
• Cutoff: 0.5 GeV
• Determination of the interaction strengthsFirst, we set λ=0, then g is fixed so as to reproduce mass of X(3872) to be 3.8715 GeV
Then, we change the value of g from 0.9g, 0.8g, 0.7g, … and determine the value of λ so as to reproduce mass of X(3872) to be 3.8715 GeV
Numerical results: X(3872) components
Λ=0.5 GeV, mX = 3.87157 GeV
Numerical results: X(3872) componentsΛ=0.5 GeV, mX = 3.87157 GeV
Numerical results: X(3872) components
Λ=0.5 GeV, mX = 3.8687 GeV
Summary of X(3872)
• Charmonium- hadronic molecule haybridΛ=0.5 GeV, B.E. = 3.03 MeV, g/g0 = 0.5
• 7% cc-bar core: good for production rate• size of the isospin symmetry breaking is OK• no charged partnar of X(3872) because ccbar cannot
couple to the charged state• cc-bar core state: decay width is large -> not observed
Zb
• M(Zb1) = 10607.2 ± 2.0 MeV/c2 Γ1 = 18.4 ± 2.4 MeVBB*bar threshold: 10604 MeV/c2
BB*bar molecule• M(Zb2) = 10652.2 ± 1.5 MeV/c2
Γ2 = 11.5 ± 2.2 MeVB*B*bar threshold: 10650 MeV/c2
B*B*bar molecule• IG (JP) = 1+ (1+)
• Interaction between B and B* is similar to that between D and D* because of the heavy quark symmetry
In the case of X (3872), about 60% of the attraction is coming from coupling to ccbar core state and rest (40%) is interaction between D and D* -> JUST FOR Zb interaction-> Ohkoda-san’s talk yesterday
• Charmonium above the open charm threshold exprimentally observed states are L >=1 decay modes
• Charmonium with L =0 open cham decay mode have not been observed