Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
London, 4.9.007
Structure and rheology of a shear-thickeningwormlike micellar system 1-4
Simultaneous formation of vorticity and velocitybands studied by birefringence measurements 1, 5, 6
1 Vishweshwara Herle, Peter Fischer2 Joachim Kohlbrecher
3 Cesare Olivero4 Sebastien Manneville5 Christophe Baravian
6 Francois Caton
1 Institute of Food Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland2 Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
3 Department of Chemistry, University of Calabria, 87036 Consenza, Italy4 Laboratoire de Physique, ENS Lyon, 69364 Lyon, France
5 LEMTA, CNRS - UMR, Nancy, France6 Laboratoire de Rheologie, Universite Grenoble, 38041 Grenoble, France
2/45 London, 4.9.007
A boring afternoon in the lab
3/45 London, 4.9.007
Micellar system under study
System: 40 mMol/L Cetylpyridinium chloride - Sodium salycilate
Shear Thickening
c 13 Pa
Newtonian
Shear thinning
Shear thickening
Formation of alternatingvorticity bands
Herle, V., Fischer, P., and Windhab, E. J. Langmuir 2005, 21, 9051
4/45 London, 4.9.007
Newtonian and shear thinning regime
Newtonian RegimeTransparent
Shear thinning regimeSlightly turbid
Optical appearance Stationary Cup
Rotating cylinderSample
5/45 London, 4.9.007
Shear thickening regime ( > c)
Shear Thickening
c 13 Pa
•Formation vorticity bands•Bands alternate in position•Shear rate and oscillates
Rheology, flow visualization and SALS -> Stress induced bands
I II III
Turbid
Transparent
1 second
6/45 London, 4.9.007
Rheology - transient shear flow
< c > c
No shear rate oscillations Shear rate oscillatesSample never equilibrates!
7/45 London, 4.9.007
Methods used & questions asked
Triggerd Rheo-Small Angle NeutronScattering (Rheo-SANS)
Newtonian clear =shear thickening clear?
Shear thinning turbid =shear thickening turbid?
Rheology & Flow visualization
Optical appearance (flip-flop) of bandscorrelated to rheological oscillations?
Influence of geometry?
8/45 London, 4.9.007
Methods used & questions asked
Direct birefringence measurements
Is there really a radial band withinthe vorticity band (sub-banding)
Fast camera, ultrasound VelocityProfiling (UVP), and Rheo-NMR
Wahst is the individual rheology ofthe clear and turbid bands?
9/45 London, 4.9.007
Vorticity bands & Rheology and SALS
Are the oscillations in viscosity andshear rate the same as in the
optical appearance of the bands?
Establish via optical rheometry and SALS the(obvious) link between ring formation and
oscillation of the free parameter
10/45 London, 4.9.007
Rheo-SSmall AAngle LLight SScattering Optical Imaging set up
|q|=0.25 - 1.0 μm-1
Both set-ups are designed for the Stress controlled rheometer (DSR)
Instrumentation (optical rheology)
11/45 London, 4.9.007
Power Spectrum
Oscillating shear rate signal from flow curvesand
Oscillating intensity signals from the shear bands
Fast Fourier Transform
Pmax
4 mm
Position I Position II
Analysis of the oscillating signal - FFT
12/45 London, 4.9.007
Flow visualization & Rheology
Oscillating shear bandsin parallel plate device
Rheological signal
Oscillations are indeed due to the flip-flop of the bands
Optical andmechanical signals
superimpose!
FFT
Herle, V., Fischer, P., and Windhab, E. J. Langmuir 2005, 21, 9051
13/45 London, 4.9.007
Amplitude of rate oscillationincreases with stress @ constant gap(except for 0.10 mm)
Decrease in gap suppresses the rate oscillationsFor a gap of 0.10 mm-> NO0.10 mm is an exception!
Certain length scale is requiredfor band formation
Effect of gap size - Amplitude
14/45 London, 4.9.007
Flow visualization & Rheology
Structural buildup is determined by the rheometer gapHerle, V., Fischer, P., and Windhab, E. J. Langmuir 2005, 21, 9051
15/45 London, 4.9.007
Flow visualization & Rheology
Herle, V., Fischer, P., and Windhab, E. J. Langmuir 2005, 21, 9051
Shear induced structures <---> Length scales
Lowering the gap•Shear thinning instead of thickening•Intensity of turbid bands decreases•More number of less intense bands•Oscillations of the are dampened
.
16/45 London, 4.9.007
Vorticity bands & SANS
What are the sstructures inthese bands?
How to access the structuralinformation in each band?
By triggering the SANS detector and selectivelycollecting the scattering for each band
17/45 London, 4.9.007
SANS - Set up
Neutron source: PSI SANS-I = 8 A
Detector dist. = 2, 6, and 18 mq range = 0.003 - 0.15 A-1°
°
NeutronbeamTo
detector
Suprasil GlassOuter cylinder dia = 32 mmInner cylinder dia = 30 mmGap = 1 mm
18/45 London, 4.9.007
Newtonian and Shear thinning regime
x = Flow directiony = Vel. gradient directionz = Vorticity direction
1. No significant anisotropyis observed
2. Partial alignment ofmicelles
Herle, V., Fischer, P., et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett., in press.
19/45 London, 4.9.007
SANS-Trigger Set-up
• Set a threshold value• Trigger the SANS detector• Collect the data
Laser
LaserDetector
Neutronbeam
To detector
20/45 London, 4.9.007
Triggered SANS measurements
1. Triggering the detector helps toseparate the scatteringinformation
2. Transparent state in this regimeis structurally different from theone in the Newtonian or shearthinning regime
3. Both transparent and turbidbands are highly anisotropic
4. Turbid state is more anisotropicthan transparent one
Herle, V., Fischer, P., et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett., in press.
21/45 London, 4.9.007
SANS Analysis for flip-flop bands
II
I vs qq plot
Hayter model for sheared (solid) cylindersDia of micelles 40 angstromApprox. length of micelles 1200 angstrom Hayter, J.B. and Penfold, J.: J. Phys. Chem 88 (1984) 4589
22/45 London, 4.9.007
SANS Analysis for flip-flop bandsAnisotropy
*
Turbid band correspond to a more anisotrope state* Croce et. al. 2005, Langmuir
Schubert et. al. 2004, Langmuir
I(Q)
I(Q)||
23/45 London, 4.9.007
High speed camera
What are the vviscosity in the individual bands (Part I)?
How to access the rheology of each band?
Motion of rotation tool captured byhigh speed camera images
24/45 London, 4.9.007
Alternating Vorticity bands
•It is difficult to capture thedynamics of the process
•Does the oscillation in the toolreally corresponds to the bands?
•If yes, then, when the toolslows down and when itaccelerates?
•Finally, what are the structuresin these bands?
Problems and Questions
25/45 London, 4.9.007
Vorticity bands- AnalysisAnalysis of the bands and the position of the tool using LabView program
26/45 London, 4.9.007
Vorticity bands- Analysis
• As the turbid band appears velocity approaches zero• Implying turbid bands may be of higher viscosity!
Lower intensity -> transparent bandHigher intensity -> turbid band
I II III
Turbid
Transparent
1 second
Herle, V., Fischer, P., et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett., in press.
27/45 London, 4.9.007
Vorticity bands & UVP
What are the vviscosity in theindividual bands (Part II)?
How to access the rheology ofeach band?
Is the turbid band more viscousthan the clear one?
By time-resolved Ultrasound Doppler Velocimetrycollecting the shear rate for each band
28/45 London, 4.9.007
UVP-Experimental Set-up
Manneville S: Eur. Phys.J.-Appl.Phys 28 (2004) 361
Newtonian With wall-slip Shear banding
v
0 e 0 e 0 e
v0
29/45 London, 4.9.007
UVP @ Newtonian and Shear thinning regime
•No radial banding in stress plateau regime as in conventional systems
•Flow is homogeneous
30/45 London, 4.9.007
UVP @ Shear thickening regime ( > c)
• Radial Banding is present• Flow is inhomogeneous• At higher stresses flow becomes chaotic!• Local velocity fluctuates as a function of time
31/45 London, 4.9.007
Local shear rates and time evolution ( > c)
Local shear rates in each band canbe calculated
This will give an idea about localshear rates
Position of the interface ( ) wasmonitored
1
.
2
.
32/45 London, 4.9.007
Local shear rates as a function of time ( > c)
In the Stress-plateau regime
1 and 2 are anticorrelated
2 and are correlated
33/45 London, 4.9.007
Local shear rates as a function of time @ 17 Pa
We do not see the vorticity bands (all turbid due to seeding):
• The behavior of local shear rates seems chaotic!• Is the flip-flop of the macroscopic motion hidden?
34/45 London, 4.9.007
Possible coexistence of radial and vorticity bands?
Vorticity banding
Newtonian flowShear-thinning flow
Radial shear banding
Coupled radial andvorticity bandingplus pretty muchnoise of rheo-chaos
35/45 London, 4.9.007
Vorticity bands & Direct birefringence
Do the sub-bands flip-flop?
How to access the structuralinformation in each band?
By direct birefringence measurement of eachband in the “chaotic regime”
36/45 London, 4.9.007
Direct birefringence - Set-up
Decruppe J.P. et al.: PRE 71 (2005) 011503
Laser close to outer cylinder
Laser close to innerrotating cylinder
37/45 London, 4.9.007
Radial sub-band found in vorticity bands
Outer cylinder:Inner cylinder (rotating):
Clear bandTurbid band Clear bandTurbid band
38/45 London, 4.9.007
Radial sub-band found in vorticity bands
Inner cylinder (rotating):
39/45 London, 4.9.007
Summary (1)
Vorticity bands correlate with the oscillation of the free rheological parameterGap effect suggest different lengthscale are relevant for rheological response
Optical andmechanical
signalssuperimpose!
F
F
T
40/45 London, 4.9.007
Summary (2)
Shear Thinning
Shear Thickening and vorticity bands
Isotropic at rest Partial Alignment
< c
Isotropic at rest Strong alignment(anisotropic)
Transparent (A) Turbid (B)
Rheo-SANS suggest the highest aligned band to be high viscous
41/45 London, 4.9.007
Summary (3)
As the turbid bandappears, velocityapproaches to Zero
Fast camera experiments show that the creating of turbid bandleads to oscillation in viscosity. Due to a phase difference of /2the system never reaches a steady state.
Turbid state is more anisotropic than transparent one
*
42/45 London, 4.9.007
Summary (4)
Local velocity measurements (Rheo-UVP) and Direct Birefringencemeasurements show the existence of coupled radial and vorticity banding
43/45 London, 4.9.007
Summary (5)
Is it a Russian Doll …
44/45 London, 4.9.007
… or scrap metal to be sold to China?
45/45 London, 4.9.007
Richard Nixon(quoted by Thomas Pynchon in “Gravities Rainbow”,
performed by Ernest in Sherman’s Lagoon)