7
Structure and Financing For Change Princeton, NJ November 6, 2009 Lee Davis Vice President, Development

Structure and Financing For Change Princeton, NJ November 6, 2009 Lee Davis Vice President, Development

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Structure and Financing For Change

Princeton, NJNovember 6, 2009

Lee Davis Vice President, Development

2

Safe Harbor Statement

This Presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions and typically can be identified by the use of words such as “expect,” “estimate,” “should,” “anticipate,” “forecast,” “plan,” “guidance,” “believe,” “will” and similar terms. Such forward-looking statements include information relating to no and low carbon development projects. Although NRG believes that these expectations are reasonable, it can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual results may vary materially. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated above include, among others, general economic conditions, hazards customary in the power industry, weather conditions, competition in wholesale power markets, the volatility of energy and fuel prices, failure of customers to perform under contracts, changes in the wholesale power markets, changes in government regulation of markets and of environmental emissions, the condition of capital markets generally, adverse results in current and future litigation, failure to identify or successfully implement acquisitions and repowerings, and the inability to implement value enhancing improvements to plant operations and companywide processes. NRG undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The foregoing review of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in the forward-looking statements included in this Presentation should be considered in connection with information regarding risks and uncertainties that may affect NRG's future results included in NRG's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.

33

Complementary combination

Fuel Supply

Fuel Transportation

Power Generation

Transmission Distribution Retail(Customer)

• Oil, gas, coal companies

• Common carriers: Pipelines, Trains, Ships

• Investor and Government Owned Utilities

• Merchant Generator(NRG, ect.)

NRG

• From Generator to Distribution substation

• From Distribution substation to home or business

• Residential, commercial, and industrial

Reliant Energy

NRG Texas:Wholesale generation totaling 11,010 MW

5,340 MW baseload (coal & nuclear)

5,475 MW gas 195 MW wind

New Reliant Energy retail: Serves nearly 1.7 mm

customers Mass: 2nd largest in Texas

with ~28% market share – 1.5 mm customers

C&I: largest in Texas over 35 TWh annual sales

Fortune 500– Ranked in top 10% for “Best Investment” (2008)

Platt’s 2007 Recipient of Energy Company and Industry Leader of the Year

Listed: NYSE (NRG)

Market Cap.: ~$6 billion

Employees: ~4,300

Generating Assets: ~23,000 MW, primarily in four domestic regions

NRG: The center of the power industry value chain.

About NRG

4

South Central

Western

Northeast

TexasCombined Scale1

Gas2,130MW

100%

Gas1,355 MW

48%Coal1,490 MW

52%

Oil3,715 MW

53%

Gas1,435 MW

20%

Coal1,870 MW

27%

Coal7,540 MW

33%

Oil3,715 MW

16%

Nuclear1,175 MW

5%

Asset scale and diversity of fuel and location provide value creation opportunities

1 Includes 115 MW as part of NRG’s Thermal assets. For combined scale, approximately 3,450 MW is dual-fuel capable. Reflects only domestic generation capacity as of December 31, 2008 MW data as of December 31, 2008

Wind 195 MW

2%

Nuclear1,175 MW

11%

Coal

4,165 MW

38%Gas

5,475 MW49% Gas

10,495 MW45%Wind

195 MW1%

About NRG

5

• A moderate initial price for carbon – starting by 2012

• Much higher carbon prices later – 2025 and beyond

• A transition from partial auction to full auction – 2012 to 2030

• Auction proceeds used to support Research, Development, Demonstration and Deployment of low-carbon technology and to cushion impact on price sensitive customers

NRG’s View on Effective National Climate Change Legislation

These features included in the House’s Waxman - Markey bill (HR 2454)

6

NRG’s Low-Carbon Focus

Nuclear • Nuclear Innovation North America (NINA)• Partnership dedicated to nuclear development,

including NRG’s South Texas Project site

Solar • Partnership with eSolar, providing modular, scalable solar thermal power

• Partnership includes development rights for multiple projects and power purchase agreements

• Development of additional solar farms outside of partnership utilizing photovoltaic technology

Biomass • Co-firing at existing coal assets• Repowering opportunities for conversion

Wind • Wind most expansive resource, but land-based is far from demand

• Current ownership of 195 MW of wind capacity• An additional 150 MW currently under construction

Carbon Capture • Post-combustion CO2 capture demonstration

• Partnership at National Carbon Capture Center

7

• State and national demand for renewable energy is at an all-time high

• Government incentives and assistance exist now

• Access to project financing is considerably tight even for projects with PPAs

• Lender appetite for new technology risk is low

• Most state-level regulatory frameworks remain incomplete for carbon sequestration

Renewable Development Opportunities and Challenges