21
- UNIVERSITY OF MAURITIUS DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Module Name: Structural Design I Module Code: CIVE 2016 Y (3) Student Name & ID: 131 0372 Veeramah Avinaash 131 8156 Bhirugnath Yashveer Name of Assessor: Mr. Sailesh Kumar Nunkoo Signature of Assessor: Date: 6 th March 2015 WRITTEN REPORT ASSESSMENT FORM Marks allocated on a 40/ 60 basis Remarks made with respect to guidance over page PRESENTATION, STYLE, LANGUAGE (40%) Remarks--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- Mark (max 40): ------ CONTENT (60%) Remarks--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Mark (max 60): ----- OTHERS Remarks--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- Total Mark (max 100): -----

Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

  • Upload
    avi2617

  • View
    27

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Design of a steel building

Citation preview

Page 1: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

-

UNIVERSITY OF MAURITIUS

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

Module Name: Structural Design I Module Code: CIVE 2016 Y (3)

Student Name & ID: 131 0372 – Veeramah Avinaash

131 8156 – Bhirugnath Yashveer

Name of Assessor: Mr. Sailesh Kumar Nunkoo Signature of Assessor:

Date: 6th March 2015

WRITTEN REPORT ASSESSMENT FORM

Marks allocated on a 40/ 60 basis

Remarks made with respect to guidance over page

PRESENTATION, STYLE, LANGUAGE (40%)

Remarks---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------

Mark (max 40): ------

CONTENT (60%)

Remarks---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------

Mark (max 60): -----

OTHERS

Remarks---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Total Mark (max 100): -----

Page 2: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

-

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

CIVE 2016 Y (3)

COURSEWORK:

Analysis of the load transfer sequences of the UoM Gymnasium.

By:

Veeramah Avinaash – 131 0372

Bhirugnath Yashveer – 131 8156

6th March 2015

Page 3: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

-

1. PRESENTATION, STYLE, LANGUAGE

(40%)

i. Presentation and style

Structure of report:

Use of tables, diagrams, pictures:

General appeal:

ii. Language

Grammar/ Use of English:

Spelling/ Clarity of expression:

Overall quality:

ASSESSOR TO

INDICATE HERE

GENERAL COMMENTS

2. CONTENT (60%)

i. Write Up

Coverage:

Level of detail:

Accuracy:

Use of references:

Overall quality:

ii. Graphs, tables, illustrations

Clarity:

Details:

Accuracy:

Overall quality:

Page 4: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

-

Acknowledgements

We seize this opportunity to express our gratitude to Mr. S.Nunkoo, our lecturer, who provided us with a

unique chance to work on this assignment. Being new to the concept of steel design, we’ve been able to

enrich our understanding of the subject matter and are now able to describe the components of any steel

framed building along with describing the load paths taken by different load systems acting on it.

Furthermore, this assignment has led us to appreciate the use of steel as a structural material in the

construction of specific buildings.

Page 5: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

-

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Aim ..................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Desk study ............................................................................................................................................... 2

2.1 Gymnasium sketches .......................................................................................................................... 2

2.1.1 General layout of gymnasium ...................................................................................................... 2

2.1.2 Top view of gymnasium .............................................................................................................. 3

2.1.3 Side view of gymnasium .............................................................................................................. 3

2.1.4 Front view of gymnasium ............................................................................................................ 4

2.1.5 Overall view of gymnasium steel structure .................................................................................. 4

2.2 Description of the structural members of UoM gymnasium ............................................................... 5

2.2.1 Purlins .......................................................................................................................................... 5

2.2.2 Rafters and haunched joints ......................................................................................................... 5

2.2.3 Bridges ......................................................................................................................................... 6

2.2.4 Braces ........................................................................................................................................... 7

2.2.5 Cylindrical beams ........................................................................................................................ 9

2.3 Method of design of steel framework of UoM Gymnasium ............................................................. 10

2.4 Load transfer mechanisms ................................................................................................................ 10

2.4.1 Transfer of gravity loads ............................................................................................................ 11

2.4.2 Transfer of wind loads ............................................................................................................... 12

3.0 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 14

References ................................................................................................................................................... 15

Page 6: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

-

List of figures

Figure 1 - General layout sketch of UoM gymnasium. ................................................................................. 2

Figure 2 - Top view of UoM gymnasium. .................................................................................................... 3

Figure 3 - Side view of UoM gymnasium. .................................................................................................... 3

Figure 4 - Front view of UoM gymnasium. .................................................................................................. 4

Figure 5 - Overall view of the UoM gymnasium. ......................................................................................... 4

Figure 6 - Purlins used in the UoM gymnasium. .......................................................................................... 5

Figure 7 - Rafter connected to a column via a haunched joint. ..................................................................... 6

Figure 8 - Bridges, fixed to purlins, at the UoM gymnasium. ...................................................................... 6

Figure 9 - Fly brace at the UoM gymnasium. ............................................................................................... 7

Figure 10 - Roof braces at UoM gymnasium. ............................................................................................... 8

Figure 11 - Side braces (K-shaped) at the UoM gymnasium. ....................................................................... 9

Figure 12 - Cylindrical beams at UoM gymnasium. ..................................................................................... 9

Figure 13 - Representative diagram of load path for gravity load system. ................................................. 11

Figure 14 - Representative diagram of load path for wind loading along the steel frame. ......................... 12

Figure 15 - Representative diagram of load path for wind loads perpendicular to the gable ends. ............ 13

Page 7: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

1 | P a g e

1.0 Introduction

Structures are designed in such a way that they are able to resist the applied loads onto them as well as

providing a pathway to channelize these loads to a safe medium. This pathway is called a load path. A load

path is, in a more technical jargon, a passageway that transfers loads on a building structure to the

foundation system and transmits them to the ground. This ensures that there is no collapse of the structure

or any other structural damage.

1.1 Aim

The main aim of this assignment is to be able to describe the load paths taken by different load systems

acting on a steel frames structure. The chosen steel structure is the gymnasium of the University of

Mauritius.

1.2 Objectives

The objectives set out to be able to meet the specified aim are as follows:

a) Visiting the above-named gymnasium.

b) Producing sketches of the gymnasium using a CAD software. In this case, the chosen software was

AutoCAD.

c) Recognizing and describing the different structural members of the building.

d) Analysing the different types of load systems acting on the building.

Page 8: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

2 | P a g e

2.0 Desk study

Following a site visit to the gymnasium, we were able to identify the main structural members of the

structure as well as producing its sketches.

2.1 Gymnasium sketches

The 2-D sketches were produced using AutoCAD and then plotted as pictures in this document.

Furthermore, an overall view of the gymnasium was produced using another CAD software, namely Sketch

Up, has been included.

2.1.1 General layout of gymnasium

Figure 1 - General layout sketch of UoM gymnasium.

Page 9: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

3 | P a g e

2.1.2 Top view of gymnasium

Figure 2 - Top view of UoM gymnasium.

Note: The red lines represent the braces of the steel structure.

2.1.3 Side view of gymnasium

Figure 3 - Side view of UoM gymnasium.

Note: The blue lines represent the side and fly braces of the steel structure.

44.3 m

34.0 m

8.0 m

mm

Page 10: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

4 | P a g e

34.0 m

2.1.4 Front view of gymnasium

Figure 4 - Front view of UoM gymnasium.

2.1.5 Overall view of gymnasium steel structure

10.0 m

10.0 m

Figure 5 - Overall view of the UoM gymnasium.

Page 11: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

5 | P a g e

2.2 Description of the structural members of UoM gymnasium

2.2.1 Purlins

It is a member subjected to biaxial bending. In the gymnasium, the purlins are connected to the steel

framework by using bolts through cleats. The latter are fixed to the columns or rafters. Its main purposes

are:

a. support external cladding of the gymnasium.

b. minimise lateral torsional buckling of the rafter at connecting joints.

Figure 6 - Purlins used in the UoM gymnasium.

2.2.2 Rafters and haunched joints

Rafters are the inclined structural members of the roof framework. They provide lateral and torsional

restraint at the supports. They are connected to columns by haunched joints. The latter are situated at the

rafter-to-rafter, apex and rafter-to-column connections. They increase the resistive moment at the joints

while adding stiffness to the frame. Excessive deflection is reduced and local buckling is prevented.

Purlins

Page 12: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

6 | P a g e

Figure 7 - Rafter connected to a column via a haunched joint.

2.2.3 Bridges

Bridges are members fitted midway between and fixed to the purlins to prevent twisting of the latter.

Moreover, the presence of ridges reduces deflection.

Figure 8 - Bridges, fixed to purlins, at the UoM gymnasium.

Bridge Bridge

Page 13: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

7 | P a g e

2.2.4 Braces

Braces are secondary members which stabilise the main members by providing a pathway for the transfer

of loads while also providing restraint to compression flanges. 3 main types of braces have been used in the

steel framework of the UoM gymnasium.

a. Fly-braces (V-shaped)

They are connected from the bottom flange of the rafter to the purlins and provide restraint to lateral

torsional buckling of the rafters.

Figure 9 - Fly brace at the UoM gymnasium.

b. Roof braces

These are plan braces which prevent lateral buckling of the compression flanges of the roof beams.

Fly-brace

Page 14: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

8 | P a g e

Figure 10 - Roof braces at UoM gymnasium.

c. Side braces (K-shaped)

They are found at the 4 extremities of the steel framework. Their main purpose is to resist torsional effects

on the columns which can occur mainly due to wind loads.

Roof

braces

Page 15: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

9 | P a g e

Figure 11 - Side braces (K-shaped) at the UoM gymnasium.

2.2.5 Cylindrical beams

These are secondary beams which link the columns and restrict the latter from moving sideways while also

helping to transmit horizontal forces.

Figure 12 - Cylindrical beams at UoM gymnasium.

Side

braces

Cylindrical

beam

Page 16: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

10 | P a g e

2.3 Method of design of steel framework of UoM Gymnasium

There are 3 main types of methods adopted for the design of a steel structure. They are:

1. Simple design – The joints are not required to resist moments.

2. Continuous design – Only the structural properties of the members need to be considered in global

analysis.

3. Semi-continuous design – The structural properties of both the members and connections need explicit

consideration in global analysis.

In this case, the continuous design method has been considered, which is exemplified by the use of

haunched joints. The end connections are assumed to be rigid and capable of transmitting moments and

shear forces between members. Also, the frame attains stability against side-sway by the bending of beams

and columns.

2.4 Load transfer mechanisms

The 2 main types of loads encountered by the gymnasium are:

1. Gravity loads – These include self-weights of the different components, the weight of finishes and wind

loads acting vertically.

2. Lateral loads – These include mainly wind loads acting in different directions.

The mechanism of transfer of the loads is described as per the following flow charts.

Page 17: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

11 | P a g e

2.4.1 Transfer of gravity loads

Figure 13 - Representative diagram of load path for gravity load system.

Load from cladding and self-

weights of members.

Rafters (in terms of bending

stresses)

Haunched joints (these take

the moments from the

rafters).

Columns

Foundation bases

Ground

Page 18: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

12 | P a g e

2.4.2 Transfer of wind loads

2.4.2.1 Case 1 – Wind loads along steel frame

Figure 14 - Representative diagram of load path for wind loading along the steel frame.

Wind loads

Roof braces (majority of

loads)

Beams (small portion of the

loads)

Columns Side braces

Foundation

base

Ground

Page 19: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

13 | P a g e

2.4.2.2 Case 2 – Wind loads perpendicular to gable ends.

Figure 15 - Representative diagram of load path for wind loads perpendicular to the gable ends.

Winds loads

Roof braces (with the haunched joints resisting

the moments caused by the wind loads)

Concrete columns

Foundation base

Ground

Page 20: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

14 | P a g e

3.0 Conclusion

It is definitely clear that loads within a building must find their way to the ground by some method. If

this does not happen, being inside of a building would never be a safe situation. Without a clear gravity

system, the loads due to the self-weight of the structural system and building materials would distribute

themselves randomly. Without a lateral system, a building would fall over like a stack of cards if a big

gust of wind came, or if an earthquake hit. This would also lead to many injuries and deaths in both

cases. Therefore, the load path process is essential to structural engineering and safety of the public.

Page 21: Structural Design I - Steel Assignment

15 | P a g e

References

1. Kristen Lechner, M.,2007. Load Paths in a Braced Frame Steel Building [online].Available

from: http://www.personal.psu.edu/kml5016/blogs/kristen_lechners_e-

portfolio/Technical%20Description.pdf [Accessed on 1st March 2015].

2. Victor Saouma, E. Structural Concepts and Systems for Architects [online]. University of

Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0428 Available from:

http://ceae.colorado.edu/~saouma/Lecture-Notes/s4a.pdf [Accessed on 2nd March 2015].