Structural and Failure Analysis: Tasks, WBS, and Cost Estimates

Shahram Sharafat and Nasr Ghoniem

University of California Los Angeles, CA.

US ITER TBM Costing Kickoff MeetingAmeriTel Inn – Idaho Falls Spectrum

Idaho Falls, IDAug. 9 – 12, 2005

Objectives

Interdependencies

Scope and Tasks

WBS Strawman

Task Force Skeleton

Preliminary Cost Estimates

Topics

Mission Statement: “To assure the structural integrity of the TBM during normal and off-normal conditions for safe ITER operation.”

Scope: To perform Structural and Failure Mode Analysis (SFA) of the entire TBM (global SFA), TBM substructures (local SFA), and TBM auxiliary structural components (supports, pipes, joints,…)

Impact of SFA: - Design modifications,- Fabrication & manufacturing specifications,

- Defining sub-module test requirements, - Safety assurance.

Structural and Failure Analysis Objectives

Objectives

Interdependencies

Scope and Tasks

WBS Strawman

Task Force Skeleton

Preliminary Cost Estimates

Topics

Interdependency of

Structural & Failure Analysis

DESIGN MATERIAL PROPERTIES

DAMAGE (Operation)FABRICATION (Joining)

SFA Requirement: Concurrent material property data, material property models, and large-scale FEM analysis.

Structural and Failure Analysis Interdependencies

Objectives

Interdependencies

Scope and Tasks

WBS Strawman

Task Force Skeleton

Preliminary Cost Estimates

Topics

TBM - Design(Task B)

TBM–OperationDamage(Task D)

TBM–Fabrication& Engineering

(Task C)

Structural &Failure AnalysisComputations

(Task A)

Integration(Task E)

Structural and Failure Analysis Scope & Tasks

Objectives

Interdependencies

Scope and Tasks

WBS Strawman

Task Force Skeleton

Preliminary Cost Estimates

Topics

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations

A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results in Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.1.1 Thermal A.1.1.2 Mechanical A.1.1.3 Thermo-Mechanical A.1.1.4 Multiphysics A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.2.1 Global SFA (entire components) A.1.2.2 Local or Substructure Analysis A.1.2.3 TBM Structural Component A.1.2.4 Breeder A.1.2.5 Structure-Breeder Interaction A.1.2.6 TBM Support Structure A.1.2.7 Piping A.1.2.8 Solid Joints (HIP, welds, brazes, coatings) A.1.2.9 Frictional Joints (flanges, bolts, fittings) A.1.2.10 Flexible Joint A.1.2.11 Cooling Manifolds A.1.2.12 Other: Keys, Gaskets, etc. A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.3.1 Normal Operation A.1.3.2 Off-Normal Operation A.1.3.3 Transients A.1.3.4 Cyclic A.1.3.5 Creep A.1.3.6 Disruption A.1.3.7 Start-Up A.1.3.8 Shut-Down A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs

A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.4.1 Elastic A.1.4.2 Inelastic A.1.4.2.1 Load Limit & Elastic-Perfectly Plastic A.1.4.2.2 Elastic-Plastic A.1.4.3 Buckling A.1.4.4 Modal A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs

A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.5.1 Operational A.1.5.2 Likely A.1.5.3 Unlikely A.1.5.4 Extremely Unlikely Event A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs

A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.6.1 Model A.1.6.1.1 Component/design geometry details A.1.6.1.2 Interface information A.1.6.1.3 Boundary conditions A.1.6.1.4 Loads A.1.6.1.5 Loading History A.1.6.1.6 Explanatory Diagrams A.1.6.1.7 CAD model transferability A.1.6.2 Material Property Data and Models A.1.6.2.1 Property data A.1.6.2.2 Property models (constitutive eqs., damage functions) A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.8.1 Import or create 3-D models A.1.8.1 Justify 3-D model simplifications (if any) A.1.8.1 Justify loading model A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs

A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.1.9.1 FEM: A.1.9.1.1 Establish computational needs A.1.9.1.2 Upload and run FEM A.1.9.1.3 Archive model, loading, and results

A.1.9.2 Perform analytical calculations (when possible) A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs

A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.2.1 Identify and classify stresses (primary, secondary, bending, membrane, etc.) A.2.2.2 Determine stress and/or strain concentration factors A.2.2.3 Compare with SDC-IC design rules (stresses, strains, deformations, damage fractions, etc.) A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs

A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Modeling & Computations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.7 Justify3-D Models used for Geometry and Loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with Analytical or Experimental Results A.2.3 Compare results with Acceptance Criteria A.2.4 Determine Uncertainties A.2.5 Establish "Design by Experiment" Needs A.2.4.1 Unacceptable uncertainties A.2.4.2 Non-justifiable simplifications A.2.4.3 Insufficient material property data or models

A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

Expand All

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis

A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations

A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A.1.1.1 Thermal A.1.1.2 Mechanical A.1.1.3 Thermo-Mechanical A.1.1.4 Multiphysics A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A.1.2.1 Global SFA (entire components) A.1.2.2 Local or Substructure Analysis A.1.2.3 TBM Structural Component A.1.2.4 Breeder A.1.2.5 Structure-Breeder Interaction A.1.2.6 TBM Support Structure A.1.2.7 Piping A.1.2.8 Solid Joints (HIP, welds, brazes, coatings) A.1.2.9 Frictional Joints (flanges, bolts, fittings) A.1.2.10 Flexible Joint A.1.2.11 Cooling Manifolds A.1.2.12 Other: Keys, Gaskets, etc. A.1.3 Establish Event Category A.1.3.1 Normal Operation A.1.3.2 Off-Normal Operation A.1.3.3 Transients A.1.3.4 Cyclic A.1.3.5 Creep A.1.3.6 Disruption A.1.3.7 Start-Up A.1.3.8 Shut-Down A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A.1.4.1 Elastic A.1.4.2 Inelastic A.1.4.2.1 Load Limit & Elastic-Perfectly Plastic A.1.4.2.2 Elastic-Plastic A.1.4.3 Buckling A.1.4.4 Modal A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements (allowable damage

limits) A.1.5.1 Operational A.1.5.2 Likely A.1.5.3 Unlikely A.1.5.4 Extremely Unlikely Event

A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A.1.6.1 Model A.1.6.1.1 Component/design geometry details A.1.6.1.2 Interface information A.1.6.1.3 Boundary conditions A.1.6.1.4 Loads A.1.6.1.5 Loading History A.1.6.1.6 Explanatory Diagrams A.1.6.1.7 CAD model transferability A.1.6.2 Material Property Data and Models A.1.6.2.1 Property data

A.1.6.2.2 Property models (constitutive eqs., damage functions) A.1.7 Justify 3-D models used for geometry and loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A.1.8.1 Import or create 3-D models A.1.8.2 Justify 3-D model simplifications (if any) A.1.8.3 Justify loading model A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.1.9.1 FEM: A.1.9.1.1 Establish computational needs A.1.9.1.2 Upload and run FEM A.1.9.1.3 Archive model, loading, and results A.1.9.2 Perform analytical calculations (when possible) A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with analytical or experimental results A.2.3 Compare results with acceptance criteria: A.2.2.1 Identify and classify stresses (primary, secondary, bending, membrane, etc.)

A.2.2.2 Determine stress and/or strain concentration factors A.2.2.3 Compare with SDC-IC design rules (stresses, strains, deformations, damage

fractions, etc.) A.2.4 Determine uncertainties A.2.5 Establish need for "design by experiment" (too complex for SFA alone):

A.2.4.1 Unacceptable uncertainties A.2.4.2 Non-justifiable simplifications A.2.4.3 Insufficient material property data or models A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database

Back to main

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

Structural and Failure Analysis Scope & Tasks

TASK-B: Design Evaluation

B.1 Design Engineering and Analysis B.1.1 Receive, Approve, Archive SFA Work Order Request (SFA-WO) B.1.2 Record Design Feature Details (thickness, fillets, rounds, chamfers, welds,

brazes, etc.) on Analysis Database B.1.3 Determine Design Tolerances B.1.4 Identify Material Choices B.1.5 Identify Loads and Load Histories B.1.6 Establish Event Category B.1.7 Complete SFA-WOR B.1.6 Archive B1.1.1 - B1.1.7 in Analysis Database

B.2 Archiving Results B.2.1 Channel SFA Result Report to Design Team B.2.2 Report Key SFA Findings to Design Team B.2.3 Archive Design Team Response to SFA Results B.2.4 Establish further Need for SFA B.2.5 Archive Future Action on Analysis Database

Back to main

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

Structural and Failure Analysis Scope & Tasks

TASK-C: Fabrication Engineering

C.1 Interfacing with Fabrication Engineering Team C.1.1 Establish Component Fabrication Methods in Analysis Database C.1.1.1 Forming and Shaping Procedures C.1.1.2 Joining C.1.1.2.1 HIP C.1.1.2.2 Weld C.1.1.2.3 Braze C.1.1.2.4 Bolt

C.1.1.2.5 Coating C.1.2 Submit Fabrication Team with Needed Material Property Data C.1.2.1 Physical C.1.2.2 Thermal C.1.2.3 Mechanical C.1.2.3.1 Fracture C.1.2.3.2 DBTT C.1.2.3.3 Creep C.1.2.3.4 Fatigue C.1.2.3.5 Irradiation C.1.2.4 Microstructure C.1.2.4.1 Grain Structure C.1.2.4.2 Defect, bubble, density

C.2 Integration of Fabrication Engr. Response C.2.1 Acquire and Archive Fabrication Procedures

C.2.2 Archive Material Data and Material Models in Analysis Database

C.3 Integration with SFA Calculation Team C.3.1 Inform SFA Team of Fabrication Procedures C.3.2 Request SFA Team to analyze and comment on Fabrication Impact on analysis results (e.g., residual stresses)

C.3.3 Archive Response from SFA Team on Fabrication Impact on Analysis

C.4 Request for "Design by Experiment" (DBE) C.4.1 Identify Need for DBE (mission critical component; inconclusive SFA results, analysis too comples for SFA alone)

C.4.2 Report Requirements/Conditions for DBE to Fabrication Team

Back to main

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

Structural and Failure AnalysisScope and Tasks

TASK-D: Operation

D.1 Detailing Operational Conditions and Analysis Requirements

D.1.2 Acquire Detailed Operating Conditions of Component from TBM Team

D.1.3 Record Details of the Event Category D.1.4 Identify Material Property Data and Modeling Sufficiency for SFA D.1.5 Report to Materials Development and Fabrication Teams any needed Material

Property Data D.1.6 Report to Materials Modeling Team any needed Property Models (constitutive

eqs., damage functions) D.1.7 Identify Design Rules and Codes (SDC-IC) Sufficiency D.1.8 Archive D.12 - D.1.7 in Analysis Database

D.2 Integration with SFA Calculation Team D.2.1 Channel Operational Conditions to SFA Calculation Team D.2.2 Supply SFA Team with Material Property and Model Data D.2.3 Inform SFA Team of ITER Design Rules to be used (SDC-IC) D.3 Archiving SFA Operational Damage Response D.3.1 Archive Response from SFA Team on Impact of Operational Condition on

Analysis

Back to main

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

Structural and Failure AnalysisScope and Tasks

TASK-E: Integration of SFA Activities

E.1 Organizational E.1.1 Establish SFA Task Force E.1.2 Develop and maintain "SFA-Database"

- Intranet Web-Site for Maintaining Rolling Records of SFA Activities

E.1.3 Establish Guidelines and Procedures for SFA Calculations E.1.4 Establish Protocols for Interaction with Design Team Members E.1.5 Establish Protocol for Interaction with Fabrication Team Members E.1.6 Establish Guidelines and Protocols for SFA Results Reporting E.1.7 Develop Templates and Forms E.1.7.1 Request for Work Order E.1.7.2 Request for Material Property Data E.1.7.3 Request for Material Property Models E.1.7.4 Request for "Design by Experiment" E.1.8 Channeling and assignment of tasks to SFA members

E.2 Material Properties Tracking E.2.1 Submit Request for tailoring and expanding US-Fusion Materials Database for SFA

Needs (add Breeder Materials, SiC, Cu, Be, W: as needed)

E.2.2 Augment US-Fusion Materials Database with Material Property Models

E.2.3 Augment US-Fusion Materials Database with Material Property Data from Fabrication

Activities

Back to main

WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

Structural and Failure AnalysisScope and Tasks

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

DCLL TBM R&D Timeline (C. Wong, Aug'05)Conceptual DesignPreliminary DesignFianl DesignTBM-Design and FabricationsDeliver to ITER

Structural & Failure Analysis ActivitiesTask A: Structural & Failure Analysis Computations

A.1 SFA Modeling and ComputationsA.2 Analysis of ResultsA.3 Archiving of Results

Task B: Design Evaluation B.1 Design Engineering and AnalysisB.2 Archiving Results

Task C: Fabrication Engineering

C.1 Interfacing with Fabrication Engr.C.2 Integration of Fabrication ResponseC.3 Interfacing with SFA Calculation TeamC.4 Request for Design by Experiment

Task D: Operational Conditions & Analysis Req.D.1 Interfacing with Fabrication Engr.D.2 Integration with SFA Calculation TeamD.3 Archiving Damage Response

Task E: Integration of SFA ActivitiesE.1 OrganizationalE.2 Material Properties TrackingE.3 Design Codes and RulesE.4 Reporting

Work Breakdown Structure for Structural & Failure Analysis for US DCLL-TBM

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

EM/S sModule NT sModule Tritium Release/TM sModule Integrated sModule

SB -TBM R&D Timeline (A. Ying, Aug.05)Conceptual DesignPreliminary DesignScaled mockup fabrication

Scaled mockup testing 1st TBM Engineering design FabricationQualification and testingITER Installation

Structural & Failure Analysis ActivitiesTask A: Structural & Failure Analysis Computations

A.1 SFA Modeling and ComputationsA.2 Analysis of ResultsA.3 Archiving of Results

Task B: Design Evaluation B.1 Design Engineering and AnalysisB.2 Archiving Results

Task C: Fabrication Engineering

C.1 Interfacing with Fabrication Engr.C.2 Integration of Fabricaiton ResponseC.3 Interfacing with SFA Calculation TeamC.4 Request for Desing by Experiment

Task D: Operational Conditions & Analysis Req.D.1 Interfacing with Fabrication Engr.D.2 Integration with SFA Calculation TeamD.3 Archiving Damage Response

Task E: Integration of SFA ActivitiesE.1 OrganizationalE.2 Material Properties TrackingE.3 Design Codes and RulesE.4 Reporting

Work Breakdown Structure for Structural & Failure Analysis of SB -TBM

Objectives

Interdependencies

Scope and Tasks

WBS Strawman

Task Force Skeleton

Preliminary Cost Estimates

Topics

Universities: UCLA (Sharafat, Ghoniem, …) UW-Madison (Blanchard) UCSB (Odette) Other (TBD)

National Labs: ORNL (McGreevy, Zinkle, …) ANL (Majumdar?) SNL (Ulrickson?) INL (?) Other (TBD)

Industries: Nuclear Power Industries Steel Industry Other (TBD)

Structural and Failure Analysis Task Force

Objectives

Interdependencies

Scope and Tasks

WBS Strawman

Task Force Skeleton

Preliminary Cost Estimates

Topics

Preliminary Design Stage (2006 - 2009):- Universities ~ 1.5

FTE- National Labs ~ 1

FTE- Industry ~ 0.5

FTE

Design Stage (2009 – 2012½): - Universities ~ 1.5

FTE- National Labs ~ 1.5

FTE- Industry ~ 1.0

FTE

Design and Fabrication (2012½ – 2014): - Universities ~ 1

FTE- National Labs ~ 0.5

FTE- Industry ~ 0.5

FTE

DCLL-TBM SFA Annual Full Time Employee (FTE)

Preliminary SFA Task Force Cost Estimates

Preliminary Design (2006 - 2009): FTE/yr $K/FTE Years $K

- Universities 1.5 200 3 900- National Labs 1 250 3 750- Industry 0.5 300 3 450

Final Design (2009 – 2012½):

- Universities 1.5 200 3.5 1050- National Labs 1.5 250 3.5 1312.5- Industry 1 300 3.5 1050

Fabrication (2012½ – 2014):

- Universities 1 200 2.5 500- National Labs 0.5 250 2.5 312.5- Industry 0.5 300 2.5 375Total Task Force 6700

Equipment (64 bit, shared memory) 105Travel 55Training 25Miscl. 15

Total DCLL SFA Activities (9 years) 6900

SB- TBM SFA Tasks Force Activities: add ~50% 3450

Total SB+DCLL SFA Task Force (9 years) 10350

Average SFA Task Force Cost (9yr) ~ $1150 K/yr

DCLL+ SB TBM Structural & Failure Analysis Task Force Preliminary Costs Estimates