S67

Acute hypertensive response is the elevation of blood pressure (BP) above normal and premorbid values

that initially occurs within the first 24 hours of symptom onset in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).1 The acute hypertensive response is characterized by its high prevalence, self-limiting nature, and prognostic sig-nificance. To remain consistent with the 2003 World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension state-ment,2 acute hypertensive response is defined as systolic BP (SBP)≥140 mm Hg demonstrated on 2 recordings taken 5 minutes apart within 24 hours of symptom onset. A total of 33 992 patients (75.0%) had an initial SBP≥140 mm Hg among 45 330 patients presenting with an ICH analyzed in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.3 Acute hypertensive response is usually set on the platform of inadequately treated or undetected chronic hypertension. However, elevation and spontaneous reduction in the ini-tial BP during the next few days support the role of other transient and stroke-specific mechanisms. Presumably, the primary cause of the acute hypertensive response is damage or compression of specific regions in the brain that medi-ate autonomic control with functional adaptation during the next few days.4,5 Hypertensive responses to other factors are exaggerated and additive because of impaired parasym-pathetic activity and baroreceptor sensitivity.6 This article addresses the state of knowledge about acute therapy for hypertensive response with ICH.

The treatment of acute hypertensive response in ICH has been controversial for the past 3 decades. The Figure dem-onstrates the 4 periods of evolution in our understanding of pathophysiology and treatment. The current notion of treat-ment is based on the observation that one third of the sub-jects presenting with ICH demonstrate hematoma expansion (with subsequent deterioration and death) in the first few hours after onset.7 An initial SBP of ≥200 mm Hg is associ-ated with hematoma expansion, perihematoma brain edema formation,8 and increased mortality9 among patients with an ICH. Recent studies suggest that reduced metabolism (hiber-nation)10 and preserved autoregulation in the perihematoma region11 may prevent any ischemic injury associated with SBP reduction. The current American Stroke Association12 and European Stroke Initiative13 guidelines recommend reduction and maintenance of SBP<180 mm Hg in patients with an ICH. A lower limit for safe reduction is undefined. Both guidelines acknowledge that there may be a subset of patients who can

tolerate more aggressive SBP reduction, such as those with good neurological status or without chronic hypertension.

Treatment of acute hypertensive response has been subsequently incorporated as 1 of the 26 quality indicators related to 18 facets of care to quantify the appropriateness of medical care.14 The ICH-specific intensity of care quality metrics14 includes treatment with intravenous antihypertensive medication for 24 hours after Emergency Department arrival for elevated BP (SBP≥180 mm Hg) as a quality parameter on the basis of its high prevalence and guidelines from professional organizations. The performance is scored as 1, if SBP target goal is reached within 2.5 hours of the second of the 2 consecutive measurements or not applicable, and 0, if SBP target range is not achieved. Treatment success is defined as target BP range achieved within 2.5 hours of elevated BP detection (on the basis of the time interval between 2 consecutive SBP≥180 mm Hg and first SBP<180 mm Hg recordings). Actual lowering of SBP and not the treatment goal specified was chosen because actual lowering is associated with lower rates of hematoma expansion and death and disability at 3 months in a previous study.15 SBP was used to define treatment target because the present evidence supports the association between SBP and hematoma expansion.16 No clear relationship with diastolic BP has been demonstrated. Interestingly, SBP in patients with an ICH demonstrates greater variability and large magnitude changes with less prominent changes in diastolic BP.17 Thus, both diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure may underestimate dynamic changes in BP in the first 24 hours of ICH. The quality metrics recommend adequate SBP control with an infusion for 24 hours after initiation of treatment (24–27 hours after symptom onset), to provide adequate SBP control during the time that hematoma expansion will mostly occur. Although the rate of hematoma expansion is highest in the first 3 hours after symptom onset,18 expansion occurs in 12% to 37% of patients between 3 and 24 hours after symptom onset. Early termination of antihypertensive treatment may lead to poor control of SBP, with subsequent increase in delayed bleeding. In a validation study, the score on intensity of care quality metrics in 50 consecutive patients with an ICH ranged from 17 to 26 points.19 Survival of patients with an ICH was different in tertiles on the basis of the performance score with highest survival among tertile of highest score on the intensity of care quality metrics (100%, 67%, and 55%; P=0.017). The receiver operator curve

The Importance of Acute Hypertensive Response in ICHAdnan I. Qureshi, MD

Received January 8, 2013; accepted March 4, 2013.From the Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.Correspondence to Adnan I. Qureshi, MD, University of Minnesota, MMC 295, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail aiqureshi@hotmail.com(Stroke. 2013;44[suppl 1]:S67-S69.)© 2013 American Heart Association, Inc.

Stroke is available at http://stroke.ahajournals.org DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000758

STR

Stroke

0039-2499

10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000758

202819

Qureshi Acute Hypertensive Response in ICH

Stroke xxx 2013

22

June

2013

44

5

00

00

© 2013 American Heart Association, Inc.

2013

62,74,193

Saritha Salve

Hemorrhagic Stroke

by guest on May 13, 2015http://stroke.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from

S68 Stroke June 2013

demonstrated a high discriminating ability of intensity of care quality metrics for in-hospital mortality (receiver operator curve value, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.6–0.87). In an exploratory analysis, we adjusted for age, hematoma volume, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, and intraventricular hemorrhage. After adjusting for markers of disease severity, higher total score on ICH-specific intensity of care quality metrics continued to demonstrate a relationship with lower in-hospital mortality (odd ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.06). However, further studies will be required to determine whether intensity of care or relative lack of response to treatment because of severity of disease accounts for this relationship. The current preliminary data support SBP treatment as a valuable part of intensity of care among patients with an ICH independent of markers of disease severity.

More aggressive SBP lowering was initially considered because an observational study suggested that more aggressive SBP reduction may have greater benefit in reducing the rate of hematoma expansion.20 The rate of hematoma expansion was 9% in patients with SBP<150 mm Hg and 30% among patients treated to maintain SBP<160 mm Hg or a higher thresh-old. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke–funded Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH)21 trial was a multicenter open-labeled pilot trial to determine tolerability and safety of 3 escalating levels of antihypertensive treatment goals for acute hyperten-sive response in 60 subjects with supratentorial ICH within 6 hours of symptom onset. The observed proportions of neuro-logical deterioration and serious adverse events were below the prespecified safety thresholds, and the 3-month mortality rate was lower than expected in all SBP tiers, including the most aggressive treatment tier (to reduce and maintain SBP<140 mm Hg).22 The Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (INTERACT) study was an investiga-tor initiated, blinded outcome, randomized trial that random-ized 404 patients with ICH23 with elevated SBP (≥150 and <220 mm Hg) to either intensive BP management (SBP<140 mm Hg) or American Stroke Association-guideline–based BP management (SBP<180 mm Hg) using available antihy-pertensive agents. Relative risk of hematoma growth ≥33% or ≥12.5 mL was 36% lower in the intensive group than in the American Heart Association-guideline–based BP manage-ment group. In subgroup analyses, patients recruited within 3

hours and patients with an initial SBP≥181 mm Hg seemed to have the greatest benefit with intensive SBP reduction.

After the ATACH I trial22 proved the feasibility and toler-ability of intensive SBP reduction, the INTERACT study23 demonstrated attenuation of hematoma expansion with inten-sive SBP reduction, 2 phase III trials were initiated. In the last quarter of 2007, the INTERACT phase III was initiated that combined the data derived from the vanguard phase and the main phase to perform the final analysis with adequate power. The trial recruited 2800 patients with acute ICH from ≈140 centers. The data are being analyzed and anticipated to be published in 2013. The primary objective of the ATACH II14,24 initiated in 2010 was to determine the efficacy of intensive BP reduction for acute hypertensive response in 1280 sub-jects with supratentorial ICH. The primary hypothesis of the trial is that intensive SBP reduction (SBP<140 mm Hg) using intravenous nicardipine infusion for 24 hours post randomiza-tion reduces the proportion of death and disability at 3 months by >10% compared with standard BP reduction (SBP<180 mm Hg) among patients with ICH treated within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. The ATACH II will provide critically unique information to address whether the benefit or lack of benefit is either augmented or unchanged in patients treated within 4.5 hours, those with SBP≥180 mm Hg, or those treated with a single agent and achieving target SBP at a high rate. The ATACH study will also provide information about any differ-ential effect between populations, or because of overall inten-sity of care or threshold for treatment.

The results of the ongoing studies will have direct implications for 75% of the patients with ICH. SBP treatment is a strategy that can be made widely available without specialized equipment or personnel, and can make a major impact on outcome in patients with ICH. In a post hoc analysis of ATACH I, we evaluated the effect of SBP reduction (relative to initial SBP) on poor 3-month outcome (defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 4–6) to derive estimates of treatment benefit.15 The median SBP reduction was 62 mm Hg at 6 hours from treatment initiation. The frequency of poor 3-month outcome was 48% versus 35% in patients having less (<62 mm Hg) versus equal to or more than the median SBP reduction (≥62 mm Hg) at 6 hours (absolute reduction of 13%). The lower rate of poor outcome at 3 months was probably attributed to the lower rate of hematoma expansion in patients with SBP reduction of ≥62 mm Hg (median value)

Figure. Evolution of under-standing on acute hypertensive response in patients with intra-cerebral hemorrhage (ICH). BP indicates blood pressure.

by guest on May 13, 2015http://stroke.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from

Qureshi Acute Hypertensive Response in ICH S69

at 6 hours from treatment (21% versus 31%, a 10% absolute reduction). A prominent reduction in morbidity and mortality may be possible if estimates of treatment effect from our current pilot trial are accurate.

DisclosuresDr Qureshi has received funding from the National Institutes of Health RO1-NS44976-01A2 (medication provided by ESP Parma), American Heart Association Established Investigator Award 0840053N, National Institute of Health U01-NS062091-01A2, and the Minnesota Medical Foundation, Minneapolis, MN.

References 1. Qureshi AI. Acute hypertensive response in patients with stroke: patho-

physiology and management. Circulation. 2008;118:176–187. 2. Whitworth JA; World Health Organization, International Society of

Hypertension Writing Group. 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003;21:1983–1992.

3. Qureshi AI, Ezzeddine MA, Nasar A, Suri MF, Kirmani JF, Hussein HM, et al. Prevalence of elevated blood pressure in 563,704 adult patients with stroke presenting to the ED in the United States. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:32–38.

4. Barron SA, Rogovski Z, Hemli J. Autonomic consequences of cerebral hemisphere infarction. Stroke. 1994;25:113–116.

5. Meyer S, Strittmatter M, Fischer C, Georg T, Schmitz B. Lateralization in autonomic dysfunction in ischemic stroke involving the insular cortex. Neuroreport. 2004;15:357–361.

6. Robinson TG, James M, Youde J, Panerai R, Potter J. Cardiac barorecep-tor sensitivity is impaired after acute stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:1671–1676.

7. Davis SM, Broderick J, Hennerici M, Brun NC, Diringer MN, Mayer SA, et al; Recombinant Activated Factor VII Intracerebral Hemorrhage Trial Investigators. Hematoma growth is a determinant of mortal-ity and poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;66:1175–1181.

8. Vemmos KN, Tsivgoulis G, Spengos K, Zakopoulos N, Synetos A, Kotsis V, et al. Association between 24-h blood pressure monitoring vari-ables and brain oedema in patients with hyperacute stroke. J Hypertens. 2003;21:2167–2173.

9. Dandapani BK, Suzuki S, Kelley RE, Reyes-Iglesias Y, Duncan RC. Relation between blood pressure and outcome in intracerebral hemor-rhage. Stroke. 1995;26:21–24.

10. Kim-Han JS, Kopp SJ, Dugan LL, Diringer MN. Perihematomal mitochondrial dysfunction after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2006;37:2457–2462.

11. Powers WJ, Zazulia AR, Videen TO, Adams RE, Yundt KD, Aiyagari V, et al. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow surrounding acute (6 to 22 hours) intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2001;57:18–24.

12. Morgenstern LB, Hemphill JC 3rd, Anderson C, Becker K, Broderick JP, Connolly ES Jr, et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2010;41:2108–2129.

13. Steiner T, Kaste M, Forsting M, Mendelow D, Kwiecinski H, Szikora I, et al. Recommendations for the management of intracranial haemorrhage—part i: spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. The European stroke initiative writing committee and the writing committee for the EUSI executive committee. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22:294–316

14. Qureshi AI. Intracerebral hemorrhage specific intensity of care quality metrics. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14:291–317.

15. Qureshi AI, Palesch YY, Martin R, Novitzke J, Cruz-Flores S, Ehtisham A, et al; Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Study Investigators. Effect of systolic blood pressure reduction on hematoma expansion, perihematomal edema, and 3-month outcome among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: results from the antihy-pertensive treatment of acute cerebral hemorrhage study. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:570–576.

16. Kazui S, Minematsu K, Yamamoto H, Sawada T, Yamaguchi T. Predisposing factors to enlargement of spontaneous intracerebral hema-toma. Stroke. 1997;28:2370–2375.

17. Morfis L, Schwartz RS, Poulos R, Howes LG. Blood pressure changes in acute cerebral infarction and hemorrhage. Stroke. 1997;28:1401–1405.

18. Kazui S, Naritomi H, Yamamoto H, Sawada T, Yamaguchi T. Enlargement of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Incidence and time course. Stroke. 1996;27:1783–1787.

19. Qureshi AI, Majidi S, Chaudhry SA, Qureshi MH, Suri MF. Validation of intracerebral hemorrhage-specific intensity of care quality metrics. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. Published online May 24, 2012.

20. Ohwaki K, Yano E, Nagashima H, Hirata M, Nakagomi T, Tamura A. Blood pressure management in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: rela-tionship between elevated blood pressure and hematoma enlargement. Stroke. 2004;35:1364–1367.

21. Qureshi AI. Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH): rationale and design. Neurocrit Care. 2007;6:56–66.

22. Antihypertensive treatment of acute cerebral hemorrhage (ATACH) investogators. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:637–648

23. Anderson CS, Huang Y, Wang JG, Arima H, Neal B, Peng B, et al; INTERACT Investigators. Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:391–399.

24. Sato S, Yamamoto H, Qureshi AI, Palesch YY, Toyoda K. Antihypertensive treatment of acute cerebral hemorrhage (ATACH)-II at Japan site: study design and advance construction of domestic research network. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2012;52:642–650

KEY WORDS: acute hypertensive response ◼ blood pressure ◼ clinical trials ◼ hypertension ◼ intracerebral hemorrhage ◼ stroke

by guest on May 13, 2015http://stroke.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from

Adnan I. QureshiThe Importance of Acute Hypertensive Response in ICH

Print ISSN: 0039-2499. Online ISSN: 1524-4628 Copyright © 2013 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.

is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000758

2013;44:S67-S69Stroke. 

http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/44/6_suppl_1/S67World Wide Web at:

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the

  http://stroke.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/

is online at: Stroke Information about subscribing to Subscriptions: 

http://www.lww.com/reprints Information about reprints can be found online at: Reprints:

  document. Permissions and Rights Question and Answer process is available in the

Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about thisOnce the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click

can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office.Strokein Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally publishedPermissions:

by guest on May 13, 2015http://stroke.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from