Strive HI 3 - Hawaii DOE | Home Page Forms/StriveHI/Striv… · · 2017-04-18Strive HI 3.0 School Accountability under ... based on test results Same targets ... • Strive HI 2.0:

HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org

Strive HI 3.0 School Accountability under the 2017-2020 Strategic Plan and new federal Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Federal law & accountability

< 2001 2001-12 2012-15 2015-16 2016-20


Elementary & Secondary

Education Act (ESEA)

No Child Left Behind

(NCLB)

ESEA Flex Waiver

(Strive HI 1.0)

ESEA Waiver Renewal

(Strive HI 2.0)

Every Student Succeeds Act (Strive HI 3.0)

D R I V E N B Y F E D E R A L R E Q U I R E M E N T S BY STRATEGIC PLAN

▪ Adequate Yearly Progress based on test results ▪ Same targets

for all schools ▪ ID’ed schools

for restructuring

▪ Multiple measures ▪ College- and

career-readiness focus ▪ Differentiated

for support and recognition

▪ Further differentiated schools for supports and recognition ▪ More college-

and career-readiness measures

▪ Measures of achievement and school quality/student success ▪ Providing

schools support

STRATEGIC PLAN INDICATORS: GOAL 1 NCLB Strive HI 1.0 Strive HI 2.0 1. Chronic absenteeism � ✔ ✔

2. School climate 3. Inclusion rate 4. 3rd grade literacy � ✔

5. 9th grade on-track (promotion rate) 6. Academic achievement ELA ✔ ✔ ✔

MATH ✔ ✔ ✔

SCIENCE ✔ ✔

7. Achievement gap (high needs vs. not high needs students)

ELA � ✔ ✔

MATH � ✔ ✔

8. High school 4-year graduation rate ✔ ✔ ✔

9. Career & Technical Education Concentrators ✔

10. College enrollment ✔ ✔

Accountability evolution


Other measures: • Strive HI 1.0: Growth in achievement, ACT gr 8 and 11 • Strive HI 2.0: Growth in achievement, Grade level retention, Advanced Coursetaking

(gr. 8 Alg I, gr. 11 & 12 CTE/AP/IB/dual credit), ACT gr 11, 5-year graduation rate

REFLECTION & REVIEW Lessons learned from NCLB & Strive HI

•  15 complex area principals’ meetings •  Meeting with DOE Priority Schools

Review ESSA law (including regulations which are now rescinded), Hawaii Revised Statutes, and BOE policies

Review research, recommended practices, and other states’ examples


Building Strive HI 3.0

DEVELOP DESIGN IDEAS Finalize Strategic Plan (including indicators) – approved by BOE unanimously on 12/6/16

Discuss potential framework and indicators with stakeholders



•  BOE, Governor, Governor’s ESSA Team Leaders

•  Governor’s ESSA Team •  Complex Area Superintendents •  Principals’ meetings (15 complex

areas, Deputy’s Roundtable, Secondary Forum, regional)

•  Complex Area Support Team meetings

•  Teacher Leader Work Group •  HSTA •  Charter School Commission •  Charter School Network •  Community stakeholder meetings

DISCUSS DRAFT Discuss recommended framework with stakeholders

Present recommended framework to BOE’s Student Achievement Committee meeting – February 7, 2017

“Critical friend” review provided by Council of Chief State School Officers

Present recommended framework to BOE’s Student Achievement Committee meeting – April 4, 2017. Additional public input to be initiated.



Sec. 1111. (c) Statewide Accountability System, (d) School Support and Improvement Activities, (h) State Reports

Achievement ELA proficiency Math proficiency

Other Academic Indicator

Student growth measure OR

A valid/reliable statewide academic indicator

Progress to ELP Progress in achieving English language proficiency

School Quality or Student Success

At least one indicator of school quality or student success

Graduation Rates (HS)

4-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOLS HIGH SCHOOLS

ESSA requirements


ALL SCHOOLS

ESSA requirements


Identification of schools for support and improvement — CSI & TSI

Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) •  Title I schools with most struggling students based on 2016-17 performance. •  Any high school with low graduation rate, based on Class of 2016 on-time

graduation rate.

Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) •  Struggling student subgroups within any school whose performance is at

CSI schools’ levels: •  Major racial/ethnic groups (including Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander and Filipino) •  Economically disadvantaged •  Children with disabilities •  English Learners

•  Subgroups identified based on 2016-17 performance. •  Subgroups will be identified as “consistently underperforming”

in Fall 2018 based on 2017-18 performance.


Improvement cycle •  Strategic Plan informs state’s ESSA plan, Strive HI 3.0

•  Strive HI 3.0 meets ESSA requirements •  Data from Strategic Plan indicators, Strive HI 3.0 informs state,

Complex Area and school planning

Strive HI 1.0 and 2.0 Strive HI 3.0 Federal requirements were supplemented to better reflect school performance and our values

Strategic Plan informs state ESSA plan, accountability system. Schools’ student success reports will be based primarily on Strategic Plan indicators

“One size fits all” indicators and reports

Opportunity for locally-selected student success measures based on schools’ academic plans to supplement shared Strategic Plan indicators.

Schools received summative ratings (performance index) and classifications of schools (e.g., Recognition, Priority)

Focus is to empower educators and communities with information for school improvement. Relevant data provided in user-friendly school reports with more detail online. Viewed as punitive, summative ratings and school classifications will be discontinued.

Strive HI 3.0 shifts



Strive HI 3.0 design principles •  State-driven, not federal-driven

•  Timely, user friendly and consistent reporting

•  Information-driven accountability

•  Local flexibility

•  Redefined federal ESSA school accountability

•  Statewide impact

•  Flexibility for multi-level schools



State, not federal-driven

•  Based primarily on Strategic Plan Indicators of Student Success. •  Supplement with federal ESSA requirements.

Timely, user friendly and consistent reporting

•  Report annually starting Fall 2017, based on 2016-17 performance. •  Report more detailed information online. •  Maintain consistent framework through duration of Strategic Plan.

Information-driven accountability

•  Empower educators and communities with information about school progress and for school improvement.

•  Discontinue composite index, summative rating, school classification.

Local flexibility •  Provide option for locally selected measures of Student Success objectives (starting Fall 2018).

Redefined federal ESSA school accountability

•  Use federal accountability specifically to identify schools with most struggling students and student subgroups for support and improvement (based on minimum federal requirements).

•  Select chronic absenteeism as federally required state-selected measure of “school quality or student success” to identify schools for support, improvement.

•  Report data for student subgroups of 20 or more (Hawaiian, Pacific Islander and Filipino in addition to federally required student subgroups) to spotlight equity.

Statewide impact •  Applies to all public schools (DOE and charter)

Multi-level schools •  Each grade span (grades K-5, 6-8, 9-12) receives its own report.

Strive HI 3.0 design principles


Empowered by Learning Whole Child Well-Rounded

Education Prepared &

Resilient

•  On-time graduation rate

•  CTE Concentrator rate

•  On-track for English Proficiency (for English Learners)

•  Chronic absenteeism

•  School climate

•  Language arts, math and science proficiency

•  Language arts and math growth

•  Achievement gap

•  3rd grade literacy •  8th grade literacy •  9th grade

promotion rate •  College

enrollment rate

HawaiiPublicSchools.org

DRAFT

•  ESSA requirement •  Strategic Plan Indicator of Student Success •  Both ESSA and Strategic Plan

Strive HI & Goal 1 objectives Statewide measures




Resilient

•  ACT college admissions results

•  Advanced course-taking (e.g., Early college, AP, IB participation)

•  5th year completer rate

•  Suspension rates

•  HĀ assessment •  Improvement in

attendance/reduction in chronic absenteeism

•  Senior project •  Performance

tasks •  Improvement in

reading (as measured by STAR)

•  End of course exams

•  Teaching Strategies Gold

•  Middle school advanced coursetaking (Algebra 1 by 8th grade)


DRAFT

Strive HI & Goal 1 objectives Examples of locally selected measures. Option to add begins Fall 2018.



DRAFT

Strive HI & Goal 1: grade span




Resilient

E L E M E N T A R Y

•  On-track to English Language proficiency (for English Learners)

•  Chronic absenteeism •  School climate

•  ELA/Math/Sci proficiency

•  ELA/Math growth •  Achievement gap

•  3rd grade literacy

M I D D L E

•  Same as elementary •  Same as elementary •  Same as elementary •  8th grade literacy

H I G H S C H O O L

Same as elementary, plus:

•  On-time graduation rate

•  Career Tech Ed Concentrator rate

•  Same as elementary • ELA/Math/Sci proficiency

• Achievement gap

•  9th grade promotion rate

•  College enrollment rate


•  Strive HI school report format •  Criteria and support for locally-selected

measures •  Online school and system performance

reporting format


Under development


Learn more, connect Strategic Plan Strive HI ESSA

bit.ly/DOEBOEStratPlan bit.ly/StriveHISystem bit.ly/HIDOEESSA

Documents

Strive HI 3 - Hawaii DOE | Home Page Forms/StriveHI/Striv… · · 2017-04-18Strive HI 3.0 School Accountability under ... based on test results Same targets ... • Strive HI 2.0: