Stress Test Results

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    1/38

    TheSupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram:

    OverviewofResults

    May7,2009

    BoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    2/38

    1

    TheSupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram:

    OverviewofResults

    May7,2009

    I.IntroductionandSummaryAbankingorganizationholdscapitaltoguardagainstuncertainty. Capitalreassuresan

    institutionsdepositors,creditorsandcounterpartiesandtheinstitutionitselfthataneventsuchasan

    unexpectedsurgeinlossesoranunanticipateddeteriorationinearningswillnotimpairitsabilityto

    engageinlendingtocreditworthyborrowersandprotectthesavingsofitsdepositors. Duringthis

    periodofheightenedeconomicuncertainty,U.S.federalbankingsupervisorsbelievethatthelargest

    U.S.bankholdingcompanies(BHCs)shouldhaveacapitalbuffersufficienttowithstandlossesandallow

    themtomeetthecreditneedsoftheircustomersinamoresevererecessionthanisanticipated. For

    thisreason,theFederalReserveandotherbanksupervisorsembarkedonacomprehensive

    simultaneousassessment

    of

    the

    capital

    held

    by

    the

    19

    largest

    U.S.

    BHCs

    in

    February

    of

    this

    year.

    ThisunprecedentedexerciseknownastheSupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram(SCAP)

    allowedsupervisorstomeasurehowmuchofanadditionalcapitalbuffer,ifany,eachinstitutionwould

    needtoestablishtodaytoensurethatitwouldhavesufficientcapitaliftheeconomyweakensmore

    thanexpected. ThoseBHCsneedingtoaugmenttheircapitalcomingoutofthisassessmentwillhavea

    monthtodesignadetailedplan,subjecttosupervisoryapproval,forthestepstheywilltaketoputthe

    SCAPbufferinplace,andthenimplementthatplanbyearlyNovemberofthisyear.

    TheunprecedentednatureoftheSCAP,togetherwiththeextraordinaryeconomicandfinancial

    conditionsthatprecipitatedit,hasledsupervisorstotaketheunusualstepofpublicallyreportingthe

    findingsofthissupervisoryexercise. Thedecisiontodepartfromthestandardpracticeofkeeping

    examinationinformationconfidentialstemmedfromthebeliefthatgreaterclarityaroundtheSCAPprocessandfindingswillmaketheexercisemoreeffectiveatreducinguncertaintyandrestoring

    confidenceinourfinancialinstitutions.Tothisend,adetailedwhitepaperontheSCAPdataand

    methodologywasreleasedonApril24th.1 Thiscompanionpaperreportsforeachofthe19institutions

    individuallyandintheaggregatetheSCAPestimatesoflossesandlossratesacrossselectcategoriesof

    loansandsecurities;theresourcesavailabletoabsorbthoselosses;andtheresultingnecessarycapital

    buffers.

    ThereareanumberofpointstokeepinmindwheninterpretingtheSCAPfindings:

    Theestimatesreportedherearethoseoftheteamsofsupervisors,economists,andanalyststhatconductedthisexercise,andtheymayormaynotlineupwithwhatthefirmsthemselvesor

    externalanalysts

    and

    researchers

    might

    have

    produced,

    even

    using

    asimilar

    set

    of

    basic

    assumptions. Theseestimatesbenefitfromtheinputofextremelydetailedinformation

    collectedfromeachofthe19BHCs,theextensivereviewandanalysisofthatinformationbythe

    1BoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem(2009)TheSupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram: Design

    andImplementationwhitepaper(WashingtonDC:BoardofGovernors,April24).

    http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/20090424a.htm.

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    3/38

    2

    SCAPteams,andthejudgmentofsupervisorsandotherexperts. Thebreadthanddepthofthe

    resourcesbroughttobearinformulatingtheseestimatesareunparalleled.

    Theestimatesarenotforecastsorexpectedoutcomes;theyaretheproductsofatwoyearaheadwhatifexerciseconductedundertwoalternativemacroscenarios. Roughlyspeaking,

    thefirstscenarioreferredtoasthebaselinewasanassumedpathfortheeconomythat

    followedthethencurrentconsensusforecast,andthesecondthemoreadversescenario

    wasadeeperandmoreprotracteddownturnthantheconsensus. Notonlyisitvirtuallycertain

    thattheeconomywillnotevolveinlockstepwitheitherofthesescenarios,buttherewerealso

    otherfactorsthathadtobeassumedconstantforthepurposeofconductingthisexercise,and

    anyofthosefactorscouldchangemateriallyfromwhatwasimplicitlyorexplicitlyassumedin

    thisprocess.

    TheSCAPwasadeliberatelystringenttest. ItwasdesignedtoaccountforthehighlyuncertainfinancialandeconomicconditionsbyidentifyingtheextenttowhichaBHCisvulnerabletoday

    toaweakerthanexpectedeconomyinthefuture. ByensuringthattheselargeBHCshavea

    capitalbuffernowthatisrobusttoarangeofeconomicoutcomes,thisexercisecountersthe

    riskthat

    uncertainty

    itself

    exerts

    contractionary

    pressures

    on

    the

    banking

    system

    and

    the

    economy. Intheeventtheeconomyweakensmorethanexpected,thefirmswillhaveadequate

    capital;intheeventtheeconomyfollowstheexpectedpath,oranevenstrongerpath,thefirms

    willstillbeviewedasstrongertodayforhavinghigherlevelsofcapitalinanuncertainworld.

    TheSCAPfocusednotonlyontheamountofcapitalbutalsoonthecompositionofcapitalheldbyeachofthe19BHCs. Thatis,SCAPassessedtheleveloftheTier1riskbasedcapitalratioand

    theproportionofTier1capitalthatiscommonequity.2 TheSCAPsemphasisonwhatistermed

    Tier1Commoncapitalreflectsthefactthatcommonequityisthefirstelementofthecapital

    structuretoabsorblosses,offeringprotectiontomoreseniorpartsofthecapitalstructureand

    loweringtheriskofinsolvency. Allelseequal,moreTier1CommoncapitalgivesaBHCgreater

    permanentloss

    absorption

    capacity

    and

    agreater

    ability

    to

    conserve

    resources

    under

    stress

    by

    changingtheamountandtimingofdividendsandotherdistributions.Todeterminethesizeof

    theSCAPbufferforeachfirm,supervisorsusedtheirestimatesofeachfirmslossesand

    resourcesforthemoreadversescenariotoanswerthefollowingtwoquestions:

    o Iftheeconomyfollowsthemoreadversescenario,howmuchadditionalTier1capitalwouldaninstitutionneedtodaytobeabletohaveaTier1riskbasedratioinexcessof6

    percentatyearend2010?

    o Iftheeconomyfollowsthemoreadversescenario,howmuchadditionalTier1CommoncapitalwouldaninstitutionneedtodaytohaveaTier1Commoncapitalrisk

    basedratioinexcessof4percentatyearend2010?

    2Tier1capital,asdefinedintheBoardsRiskBasedCapitalAdequacyGuidelines,iscomposedofcommonand

    noncommonequityelements,someofwhicharesubjecttolimitsontheirinclusioninTier1capital. See12CFR

    part225,AppendixA,II.A.1.Theseelementsincludecommonstockholdersequity,qualifyingperpetual

    preferredstock,certainminorityinterests,andtrustpreferredsecurities. Certainintangibleassets,including

    goodwillanddeferredtaxassets,aredeductedfromTier1capitalorareincludedsubjecttolimits.See12CFRpart

    225,AppendixA,II.B.

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    4/38

    3

    TheSCAPbufferdoesnotrepresentanewcapitalstandardandisnotexpectedtobemaintainedonanongoingbasis. Instead,thatcapitalisavailabletohelpBHCsabsorblargerthanexpected

    futurelosses,shouldtheyoccur,andtosupporttheBHCsabilitytoservetheircustomers,

    includinglendingtocreditworthyborrowersduringtheeconomicdownturn.

    TheresultsoftheSCAPsuggestthatiftheeconomyweretotrackthemoreadversescenario,

    lossesat

    the

    19

    firms

    during

    2009

    and

    2010

    could

    be

    $600

    billion.

    The

    bulk

    of

    the

    estimated

    losses

    approximately$455billioncomefromlossesontheBHCsaccrualloanportfolios,particularlyfrom

    residentialmortgagesandotherconsumerrelatedloans. Theestimatedtwoyearcumulativelosseson

    totalloansunderthemoreadversescenariois9.1percentatthe19participatingBHCs;forcomparison,

    thistwoyearrateishigherthanduringthehistoricalpeaklossyearsofthe1930s. Estimatedpossible

    lossesfromtradingrelatedexposuresandsecuritiesheldininvestmentportfoliostotaled$135billion.

    Incombinationwiththelossesalreadyrecognizedbythesefirmssincemid2007,largelyfromcharge

    offsandwritedownsonthevaluesofsecurities,theSCAPresultssuggestfinancialcrisisrelatedlosses

    atthesefirms,iftheeconomyweretofollowthemoreadversescenario,couldtotalnearly$950billion

    bytheendof2010.

    Thepotential

    losses

    facing

    these

    19

    firms

    have

    to

    be

    weighed

    against

    the

    potential

    resources

    availabletothemtoabsorbthoselosses. Atyearend2008,capitalratiosatall19BHCsexceeded

    minimumregulatorycapitalstandards,inmanycasesbysubstantialmargins,andmostmetsupervisory

    expectationsonthecompositionofcapital. Tier1capitalatthesefirmstotaledabout$835billioninQ4

    2008. ThepracticalimplicationofthiscapitalisthatmanyoftheBHCsalreadyhadsubstantialcapital

    buffersinplacetoabsorbtheirshareoftheestimated$600billionoflosses. Inaddition,bankswill

    realizerevenuesfromongoingbusinessestoabsorblosses,thoughatalowerlevelintheweak

    economicconditionsofthestressscenariothaninthebaseline. However,someofthoserevenueswill

    needtogointobuildingloanlossreservesagainstcreditproblemsin2011.

    Aftertakingaccountoflosses,revenuesandreservebuildrequirements,intheaggregate,these

    firmsneedtoadd$185billiontocapitalbufferstoreachthetargetSCAPcapitalbufferattheendof

    2010underthemoreadversescenario. Therearetwoimportantthingstonoteaboutthisestimate.

    First,the$185billionaccruesto10ofthe19firms,meaning9ofthe19firmsalreadyhavecapital

    bufferssufficienttogetthroughtheadversescenarioinexcessof6percentTier1capitaland4percent

    Tier1Commoncapital. Second,thevastmajorityofthis$185billioncomesfromashortfallinTier1

    Commoncapitalinthemoreadversescenario,withvirtuallynoshortfallinoverallTier1capital. This

    resultmeansthatwhilenearlyallthefirmshavesufficientTier1capitaltoabsorbtheunusuallyhigh

    lossesofthemoreadversescenarioandstillend2010withaTier1riskbasedratioinexcessof6

    percent,10ofthesefirmshadcapitalstructuresthataretoostronglytiltedtowardcapitalotherthan

    commonequity. Thus,eachofthe10firmsneedingtoaugmenttheircapitalasaresultofthisexercise

    mustdosobyincreasingtheirTier1Commoncapital.

    The$185

    billion

    estimated

    additional

    capital

    buffers

    correspond

    to

    the

    estimate

    that

    would

    haveappliedattheendof2008. Butanumberofthesefirmshaveeithercompletedorcontractedfor

    assetsalesorrestructuredexistingcapitalinstrumentssincetheendof2008inwaysthatincreasedtheir

    Tier1Commoncapital. TheseactionssubstantiallyreducedthefinalSCAPbuffer. Inaddition,thepre

    provisionnetrevenuesofmanyofthefirmsexceededwhatwasassumedinthemoreadversescenario

    byalmost$20B,allowingthemtobuildtheircapitalbases. Theeffectsofthesetransactionsand

    revenuesrenderedtheadditionalcapitalneededtoestablishtheSCAPbufferequalto$75billion.

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    5/38

    4

    Asmentionedabove,anyBHCneedingtoaugmentitscapitalbufferwillberequiredtodevelop

    adetailedcapitalplantobeapprovedbyitsprimarysupervisor,afterconsultationwiththeFDICandthe

    Treasury,overthenext30days,andtoimplementthatplaninthenextsixmonths. BHCsare

    encouragedtodesigncapitalplansthat,whereverpossible,activelyseektoraisenewcapitalfrom

    privatesources. Theseplanscanalsoincludeactionssuchasrestructuringcurrentcapitalinstruments,

    salesofassets,andrestrictionsondividendsandstockrepurchases,andwillhavebenchmarksforfirms

    toachieveinspecifiedtimeframes.

    SomefirmsmaychoosetoapplytotheU.S.TreasuryforMandatoryConvertiblePreferred

    (MCP)underitsCapitalAssistanceProgram(CAP)asabridgetoprivatecapitalinthefuture. MCPcan

    serveasasourceofcontingentcommoncapitalforthefirm,convertibleintocommonequitywhenand

    ifneededtomeetsupervisoryexpectationsregardingtheamountandcompositionofcapital. In

    addition,theTreasurywillconsiderrequeststoexchangeoutstandingpreferredsharessoldunderthe

    CapitalPurchaseProgram(CPP)orTargetedInvestmentProgram(TIP)fornewMCP. The19firmshave

    U.S.Treasurypreferredequitysecuritiesof$216billion.

    Strongbankswithamplecapitalareessentialforarobusteconomy. Bymakingacareful

    evaluationof

    the

    potential

    vulnerabilities

    of

    the

    largest

    19

    U.S.

    BHCswhich

    together

    hold

    two

    thirds

    of

    assetsandmorethanonehalfoftheloansintheU.S.bankingsystemtheSCAPwillhelptoensurethe

    strengthoftheU.S.bankingsector. TheSCAPisalsoanimportantcomplementtotheU.S.Treasurys

    supportoftheU.S.bankingsystem,andhelpstoprotectthetaxpayersinvestmentsinU.S.financial

    institutions. Bothoftheseprograms,byincreasingthequantityandqualityofcapitalheldbylargeU.S.

    BHCs,willhelpreduceuncertaintyabouttheimpactofpotentiallosses,andallowtheU.S.banking

    systemtoplayitsroleinsupportingastronger,faster,andmoresustainableeconomicrecovery.

    II.SCAPLossandResourceProjectionsTheparticipatingBHCswereaskedtoestimatetheirpotentiallossesonloans,securities,and

    tradingpositions,aswellaspreprovisionnetrevenue(PPNR)andtheresourcesavailablefromthe

    allowanceforloanandleaselosses(ALLL)undertwoalternativemacroeconomicscenarios. Theseestimateswerereviewedandanalyzedbysupervisorsandthenevaluatedagainstindependent

    benchmarksdevelopedbysupervisorstoarriveatthesupervisorslossestimates. Carewastakento

    ensurethatthelossandresourceestimatesreflectedtheriskandbusinesslinesofeachBHC,andthat

    theywereconsistentwiththemacroeconomicenvironmentspecifiedinthetwoeconomicscenarios,

    especiallyforthemoreadversescenariothatformsthebasisofthecapitalbuffercalculations. This

    sectionreportstheresultsofthisprocess,firstinaggregateforthe19participatingBHCsandthenfor

    individualfirms.

    II.A.LossandResourceEstimatesbyBHCs

    Eachparticipating

    BHC

    was

    instructed

    to

    estimate

    potential

    losses

    on

    its

    loan,

    investment

    securities,andtradingportfolios,includingoffbalancesheetcommitmentsandcontingentliabilitiesand

    exposures,overthetwoyearhorizonbeginningwithyearend2008financialstatementdata. Forloans,

    theBHCswereinstructedtoestimateforwardlooking,undiscountedcreditlossesthatis,lossesdueto

    failuretopayobligations(cashflowlosses)ratherthandiscountsrelatedtomarktomarketvalues.

    Toguideestimation,thefirmswereprovidedwithacommonsetofindicativelossraterangesfor

    specificloancategoriesunderconditionsofthebaselineandthemoreadverseeconomicscenarios(see

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    6/38

    5

    table1). Firmswereallowedtodivergefromtheindicativelossrateswheretheycouldprovide

    evidencethattheirestimatedlossrateswereappropriate.

    Theindicativelossraterangeswerederivedusingavarietyofmethodsforpredictingloan

    losses,including

    analysis

    of

    historical

    loss

    experience

    at

    large

    BHCs

    and

    quantitative

    models

    relating

    the

    performanceofloansorgroupsofloanstomacroeconomicvariables. Supervisorsviewedthese

    indicativerangesasusefulindicatorsofindustrylossratesandinthatwaytheycanserveasageneral

    guide,butrecognizedthattheymightnotadequatelycapturedifferencesacrossindividualfirmsthat

    couldaffecttheperformanceandlossesinsignificantways. Thus,supervisorsaskedfirmstoprovide

    granulardataabouttheparticularcharacteristicsoftheirportfoliosinordertomakemoretailored

    quantitativeassessmentsofloss. LossestimatesfortheSCAPthusreliedultimatelyonfirmspecific

    informationaboutfactorssuchaspastperformance,originationyear,borrowercharacteristics,and

    geographicdistribution.

    II.B.AggregateLossEstimates

    Thetwoyearlossestimatestotalcloseto$600billioninthemoreadversescenarioforthe19

    BHCs(table2). EstimatedSCAPlossesonresidentialmortgagesaresubstantialoverthetwoyear

    scenario,consistentwiththesharpdropinresidentialhousepricesinthepasttwoyearsandtheir

    projectedcontinuedsteepfallinthemoreadversescenario. Expectedlossratesonfirstliensand

    second/juniorliensarewelloutsidethehistoricalexperienceofcommercialbanks. Theeffectsof

    reducedhomepricesonhouseholdwealthandtheindirecteffectsthroughreducedeconomicactivity,

    alsopushupestimatedlossesonconsumercredit,includinglossesoncreditcardsandonother

    consumerloans. Together,residentialmortgagesandconsumerloans(includingcreditcardandother

    Baseline MoreAdverse

    FirstLienMortgages 56 78.5

    Prime 1.52.5 34

    AltA 7.59.5 9.513

    Subprime 1520 2128

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 912 1216

    ClosedendJuniorLiens 1820 2225

    HELOCs 68 811

    C&ILoans 34 58

    CRE 5

    7.5 9

    12

    Construction 812 1518

    Multifamily 3.56.5 1011

    Nonfarm,Nonresidential 45 79

    CreditCards 1217 1820

    OtherConsumer 46 812

    OtherLoans 24 410

    Table1:IndicativeLossRatesProvidedtoBHCsforSCAP(cumulativetwoyear,inpercent)

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    7/38

    6

    consumerloans,notshown)accountfor$322billion,or70percentoftheloanlossesprojectedunder

    themoreadversescenario.3 Estimatedlossratesoncommercialrealestateloans,especiallythose

    relatedtolanddevelopment,alsoareelevatedinthemoreadversescenario,reflectingrealizedand

    projectedsubstantialdeclinesinrealestatevalues. Forcommercialandindustrialloans,estimatedloss

    ratesarewithintherangeofthoseexperiencedinbusinessdownturnsinpastrecentrecessions.

    Intotal,theestimatedloanlossratesunderthemoreadversescenarioareveryhighby

    historicalstandards. Thetwoyearcumulativelossrateontotalloansequals9.1percentinthemore

    3Someoftheselosseshavealreadybeentaken,however,intheformofdiscountsonimpairedloansacquired

    duringmergers. Thesediscountsreducefutureestimatedcreditlossesonresidentialmortgageandconsumer

    loansbyapproximately$57billion,whichwasincorporatedwhencalculatingtheadditionalcapitalfortheSCAP

    buffer.

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions

    Tier1Capital 836.7

    Tier1CommonCapital 412.5

    RiskWeightedAssets 7,814.8

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 599.2

    FirstLienMortgages 102.3 8.8%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 83.2 13.8%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 60.1 6.1%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 53.0 8.5%

    CreditCardLoans 82.4 22.5%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 35.2 na

    Trading&Counterparty 99.3 na

    Other(1) 83.7 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments 64.3

    ResourcesOther

    Than

    Capital

    to

    Absorb

    Losses

    in

    the

    More

    Adverse

    Scenario

    (2)

    362.9

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 185.0

    Less:CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3)(4) 110.4

    SCAPBuffer(5) 74.6

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    (5)TheremaybeaneedtoestablishanadditionalTier1capitalbuffer,butthiswouldbesatisfiedbytheadditionalTier1Commoncapitalbuffer

    unlessotherwisespecifiedforaparticularBHC

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Table2:SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    AggregateResultsfor19ParticipatingBankHoldingCompaniesfortheMoreAdverseScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    MoreAdverseScenario

    (4)TotalincludesonlycapitalactionsandeffectsofQ12009resultsforfirmsthatneedtoestablishaSCAPbuffer

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    8/38

    7

    adversescenario. AsshowninFigure1,thislossrateishigherthantwoyearlossratesobservedfor

    U.S.commercialbanksfrom1920to2007/2008. Inadditiontothesharpesttwoyeardropinresidential

    housepricessincethen,andaprojectedfurthersteepdeclineinthewhatifadversescenario,therisein

    theunemploymentrateinthescenariowouldbemoreseverethananyU.S.recessionsincethe1930s.4

    Table2alsoreportsaggregateprojectionsforlossesonsecuritiesheldintheavailableforsale

    (AFS)andheldtomaturity(HTM)investmentportfoliosand,forBHCswithtradingaccountassets

    exceeding$100billion,lossesontradingandcounterpartycreditrisklosses. Theselossesrepresenta

    significantshareofthetotal.

    ToevaluatelossesforsecuritiesintheAFSandHTMportfolios,supervisorsfocusedonsecurities

    subjectto

    credit

    risk.

    At

    the

    end

    of

    2008,

    the

    19

    BHCs

    held

    $1.5

    trillion

    of

    securities,

    more

    than

    one

    half

    ofwhichwereTreasury,agencies,orsovereignsecurities,orhighgrademunicipaldebt,andsoare

    subjecttonoorlimitedcreditrisk. Onlyabout$200billionwasinnonagencymortgagebacked

    securities(MBS)andonlyaportionofthesewererecentvintageorwerebackedbyriskiernonprime

    mortgages. Remainingmaterialexposuresincludedcorporatebonds,mutualfunds,andotherasset

    backedsecurities. Forsecuritizedassets,supervisorsassessedifthesecuritywouldbecomeimpaired

    duringitslifetime. Ifthecurrentlevelofcreditsupportwasconsideredinsufficienttocoverexpected

    losses,thesecuritywaswrittendowntofairvaluewithacorrespondingotherthantemporary

    impairment(OTTI)charge,equaltothedifferencebetweenbookandmarketvalue. TheseOTTI

    chargesequaled$35billioninthemoreadversescenario,withalmostonehalfoftheestimatedlosses

    comingfromthenonagencyMBS.5

    4AnotherreferencefortheestimatedlossratesintheSCAPiswheretheystandrelativetoestimatesmade

    recentlybyotheranalysts. Unfortunately,manyofthelossestimatesarenotdirectlycomparablebecausethey

    arefordifferenttimehorizons(forexample,lifetimelosses)orarebasedondifferenteconomicscenarios.

    However,basedonassessmentsthatwecanmakewiththeavailableinformation,theSCAPestimatesappearto

    beaboutinthemiddleoftherangeoftheseotherestimates.5Torecognizelossesinthemoreadversescenario,supervisorschoseaconservativeapproach.Financial

    AccountingStandardsBoard(FASB)StaffPositionFAS1152andFAS1242,RecognitionandPresentationofOther

    ThanTemporaryImpairments, April9,2009,regardsdebtsecuritiesheldintheAFSandHTMaccountsand

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    1921

    1926

    1931

    1936

    1941

    1946

    1951

    1956

    1961

    1966

    1971

    1976

    1981

    1986

    1991

    1996

    2001

    2006

    Percent

    Figure 1: Commercial Bank Two-Year Loan Loss Rates1921 - 2008

    SCAP Total Loan Loss Rates = 9.1%

    Sources: International Monetary Fund (1920 - 1933), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (1934 - 2007), and commercial bank reports on condition and income (2008)

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    9/38

    8

    Inaddition,firmswithtradingassetsof$100billionormorewereaskedtoestimatepotential

    tradingrelatedmarketandcounterpartycreditlossesunderamarketstressscenarioprovidedbythe

    supervisors,basedontheseveremarketshocksthatoccurredinthesecondhalfof2008. Theestimated

    lossesfromtradingrelatedexposuresweresubstantial,closeto$100billionacrossthefivefirmsto

    whichitwasapplied. Theprimarydriversofpotentialstresslosseswereprivateequityholdings,other

    creditsensitivetradingpositions,andpossiblelossesstemmingfromcounterpartycreditexposurestooverthecounter(OTC)derivativestradingcounterparties. Thepossiblelossesfromcounterpartycredit

    exposuresweremeasuredusingcreditvaluationadjustmentmethodsbasedonstressedexposurelevels

    andexpecteddeteriorationofthecreditworthinessofcounterpartiesunderthemoreadversescenario.

    Thetotallossestimateof$600billionforthe19BHCsisinadditiontothesubstantiallossesthat

    havealreadybeentakenbythesefirmsinthepastcoupleofyears.6 Thatis,theforwardlookinglosses

    intheSCAPdonotincludethelossesthathavealreadyoccurredsincetheassetswereoriginatedand

    arealreadyreflectedinthefirmsbalancesheets. Lossestakeninthesixquartersthroughtheendof

    2008bythesefirmsandfirmstheyacquiredaresubstantial,estimatedatapproximately$400billion.

    Theyincludechargeoffs,writedownsonsecuritiesheldinthetradingandintheinvestmentaccounts,

    anddiscounts

    on

    assets

    acquired

    in

    acquisitions

    of

    distressed

    or

    failed

    financial

    institutions.

    As

    an

    offset,about$65billioninthesemergerrelateddiscountsarecapturedintheSCAPlossprojections(the

    socalledpurchaseaccountingadjustments)whichreflectthatasubstantialpartofestimatedlosseson

    theassetspurchasedwerealreadyrecorded. Thus,amorecomprehensivemeasureoflossestotalsat

    least$935billionforthe19participatingBHCsinthemoreadversescenario.7

    II.C.FirmlevelLossEstimates

    Asdiscussedearlier,theSCAPlossestimatesweremadeusingconsiderablefirmspecificdata

    abouttheriskandlikelyfutureperformanceoftheportfolios. Becausetheexercisemadeextensiveuse

    ofthisinformation,theresultinglossratesvarysignificantlyacrossBHCs. Table3summarizesthe

    results

    for

    each

    of

    the

    19

    BHCs

    that

    participated

    in

    the

    SCAP.

    The

    table

    reports

    loss

    amounts

    and

    loss

    rates,alongwithprojectionsofresourcestoabsorblosses,andtotalcapitalneedateachinstitution.

    Theappendixcontainsseparatetablesforeachofthe19BHCs.

    focusesonwhetherfirmsintendtosellanimpairedsecurityorwhether itismorelikelythannotthatfirmswillbe

    requiredtosellthesecuritybeforerecoveryofitscostbasis. Ifeitheroftheseconditionsismet,thefirmmust

    recognizeOTTI.TheFASBsguidanceholdsthatafirmsdeterminationofitsabilitytoholdasecuritytorecovery

    shouldconsidersourcesofuncertainty. Supervisorsbelieveditprudenttoincorporatethepossibilitythatfirms

    maynotbeabletoholdasecuritytorecoveryunderconditionsmorestressfulthanexpected. Thusforthose

    securitiesestimatedorrecommendedbysupervisorstobeotherthantemporarilyimpaired,thelosswasequalto

    thedifference

    between

    the

    investments

    amortized

    cost

    basis

    and

    its

    fair

    value.

    6Pastlosses,however,arerecognizedinthestartingregulatorycapitallevelsusedtocalculatetheSCAPcapital

    buffer,asdiscussedinthenextsectionofthepaper.7TheselossesarenotfulllifetimelossesbecausetheSCAPlossprojectionsareforatwoyearforwardhorizonand

    thusdonotcapturelossesoccurringbeyondtheendof2010. However,giventheprofileofthemoreadverse

    scenario,whichincludesareturntopositiverealGDPgrowthwithinthetwoyears,thishorizonseemslikelyto

    capturealargeportionoflossesfrompositionsheldasoftheendof2008. Theimpactofsomelossesafter2010is

    alsocapturedintheoverallSCAPexercisethroughthecalculationofyearend2010reserves,whicharecalibrated

    tobesufficienttocoverprojected2011losses.

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    10/38

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    11/38

    10

    Figure2showstheratiooftotalestimatedtwoyearlossestoyearend2008riskweighted

    assets(RWA)inthemoreadversescenarioforthe19participatingBHCs. Clearly,thereissubstantial

    variationacrossfirmsinthesizeofestimatedlossesrates,reflectingdifferencesinbusinesslinesand

    assetquality. ThemedianlosstoRWAratioequals7.5percent,andtheratiorangesfrom3.0percent

    to11.8percentacrossthefirms. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlosses,butare

    estimatesoflossesthatwouldoccurundereconomicconditionsmorestressedthananticipated. HigherlossestimatesdonotnecessarilyimplyaneedformorecapitaltomeettheSCAPbuffer,assomefirms

    willalsohavehigherestimatedresourcesandcapital.

    Thenextfivechartsillustrateselectedlossratesbyloantypeacrossthe19BHCs. Lossratesare

    calculatedascumulative,twoyearlossesdividedbybeginningofperiodloanbalances.Thelossrates

    donotreflectadjustmentstorecognizewritedownsofloanportfoliosacquiredduringmergers. The

    chartsalsoshowthemedianlossrateacrossthefirms.

    Aswithoveralllosses,therearesignificantdifferencesinlossratesbyloantypeacrossBHCs.

    Forexample,whilethemediantwoyearlossrateonfirstlienmortgageswas8percentacrossthe15

    BHCswithamaterialamountofmortgages,theratesvariedfromalowof3.4percenttoahighofnearly

    12percent. Forsecondandjuniorlienmortgages,therangeamong14BHCswas6percentto21

    percent,and

    amedian

    rate

    of

    about

    13

    percent.

    Such

    variation

    reflects

    substantial

    differences

    in

    the

    portfoliosacrosstheBHCs,byborrowercharacteristicssuchasFICOscores,andloancharacteristicssuch

    asloantovalueratio,yearoforigination,andgeography. Thesedifferencesresultinsignificant

    variationinlossestimatesatthefirmlevelascomparedwithapplyingasinglelossrateperasset

    categorytoallBHCs.

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    AmEx

    BofA

    BB&T

    BNYM

    CapitalOne

    Citi

    FifthThird

    GMAC

    Goldman

    JPMC

    KeyCorp

    Metlife

    MorganStanley

    PNC

    Regions

    StateStreet

    SunTrust

    USB

    Wells

    Percent

    Figure2:SupervisorEstimatesofTotalLossestoRiskWeightedAssets

    forMoreAdverseScenario

    Median= 7.5%

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    12/38

    11

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    AmEx

    BofA

    BB&T

    BNYM

    CapitalOne

    Citi

    FifthThird

    GMAC

    Goldman

    JPMC

    Ke

    yCorp

    M

    etlife

    MorganStanley

    PNC

    Re

    gions

    StateStreet

    Sun

    Trust

    USB

    Wells

    Percent

    Figure3:SupervisorEstimatesofFirstLienMortgageLoanLossRates*

    forMoreAdverseScenario

    Median= 8.0%

    *IncludesPrime,AltA,andSubPrimemortgages

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    AmEx

    BofA

    BB&T

    BNYM

    CapitalOne

    Citi

    FifthThird

    GMAC

    Goldman

    JPMC

    KeyCorp

    Metlife

    MorganStanley

    PNC

    Regions

    StateStreet

    SunTrust

    USB

    Wells

    Percent

    Figure4: SupervisorEstimatesofSecondLienMortgageLoanLossRates*

    forMoreAdverseScenario

    Median= 13.3%

    *Includes

    closed

    end

    junior

    liens

    and

    HELOCs

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    13/38

    12

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    AmEx

    BofA

    BB&T

    B

    NYM

    Capita

    lOne

    Citi

    Fifth

    Third

    G

    MAC

    Goldman

    JPMC

    KeyCorp

    M

    etlife

    MorganStanley

    PNC

    Re

    gions

    StateS

    treet

    Sun

    Trust

    USB

    Wells

    Percent

    Figure5: SupervisorEstimatesofCommercialRealEstateLoanLossRates*

    forMoreAdverseScenario

    Median= 10.6%

    *Includesconstruction,multifamily, andnonfarm/nonresidential

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    AmEx

    BofA

    BB&T

    BNYM

    CapitalOne

    Citi

    FifthThird

    GMAC

    Goldman

    JPMC

    KeyCorp

    Metlife

    M

    organStanley

    PNC

    Regions

    StateStreet

    SunTrust

    USB

    Wells

    Percent

    Figure6:SupervisorEstimatesofCommercial&IndustrialLoanLossRates

    forMoreAdverseScenario

    Median= 5.8%

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    14/38

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    15/38

    14

    III.TheSCAPCapitalBufferMinimumcapitalstandardsforaBHCareintendedtoserveonlyasaguideforsupervisorsin

    determiningtheadequacyoftheBHCscapitalrelativetoitsriskprofile. Inpractice,supervisorsexpect

    allBHCstohavealevelandcompositionofTier1capitalwellinexcessofthe4percentregulatory

    minimum,andalsotohavevotingcommonstockholdersequityasthedominantelementofTier1

    capital. Inthisregard,theuseofTier1CommoncapitalintheSCAPisconsistentwiththeBoardslong

    held

    belief

    that

    common

    equity

    should

    be

    the

    dominant

    form

    of

    Tier

    1

    Capital.

    8

    Under

    the

    SCAP,

    supervisorsevaluatedtheextenttowhicheachofthe19BHCswouldneedtoaltereithertheamountor

    thecomposition(orboth)ofitsTier1capitaltodaytobeabletoexceedminimumregulatory

    requirementsinQ42010,evenunderanunexpectedlyadverseeconomicoutcome.

    Specifically,theSCAPcapitalbufferforeachBHCissizedtoachieveaTier1riskbasedratioofat

    least6percentandaTier1Commoncapitalratioofatleast4percentattheendof2010underthe

    moreadversemacroeconomicscenario. ByfocusingonTier1CommoncapitalaswellasTier1capital,

    theSCAPemphasizedboththeamountofaBHCscapitalandthecompositionofitscapitalstructure.

    OncetheSCAPupfrontbufferisestablished,thenormalsupervisoryprocesswillcontinuetobeusedto

    determinewhetherafirmscurrentcapitalratiosareconsistentwithregulatoryguidance.

    Byits

    design,

    the

    SCAP

    is

    more

    stringent

    than

    asolvency

    test.

    Each

    BHCs

    capital

    was

    rigorously

    evaluatedagainstatwoyearaheadadversescenariothatisnotapredictionoranexpectedoutcome

    fortheeconomy,butisinsteadawhatifscenario. Thus,anyneedforadditionalcapitaland/ora

    changeincompositionofcapitaltomeettheSCAPbufferbuildsinextracapitalagainsttheunlikely

    8Tier1CommoncapitaliscalculatedasTier1capitallessnoncommonelements,includingqualifyingperpetual

    preferredstock,qualifyingminorityinterestinsubsidiaries,andqualifyingtrustpreferredsecurities.

    2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    A

    mEx

    BofA

    B

    B&T

    BNYM

    CapitalOne

    Citi

    FifthThird

    GMAC

    Gold

    man

    J

    PMC

    KeyCorp

    Me

    tlife

    MorganSta

    nley

    PNC

    Reg

    ions

    StateStreet

    SunTrust

    USB

    W

    ells

    Percent

    Figure8:SupervisorEstimatesofResourcestoAbsorbLossestoRisk

    WeightedAssetsforMoreAdverseScenario

    Median= 4.9%

    *Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelesschanges inALLL

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    16/38

    15

    eventtheadversescenariomaterializesand,inthatwayitmayhelptopreventthatadverseeventfrom

    occurring.

    TheillustrationbelowshowshowthebufferworksforahypotheticalBHCneedingtoaugment

    itscapitalattheendoftheSCAP. ThelefthandsideoftheexhibitshowstheBHCsinitialcapitallevel

    uponthecompletionoftheSCAPonMay7anditscapitallevelafteritbuildstheSCAPbufferoverthe

    sixmonthsfromMay7toNovember9.MuchlikethestressassessmentexerciseundertakenintheSCAP,therighthandsideoftheexhibitshowswhatwouldhappentotheBHCscapitalundertwo

    alternativescenariosforthemacroeconomy. Intheexpected,orbaseline,scenario,theBHCwouldend

    theperiodwithevenhighercapitallevelsthatarewellaboveregulatoryminimums,whileintheworse

    thanexpected,ormoreadversescenario,theBHCwouldendtheperiodwithcapitalnearorslightly

    aboveappropriatelevels.

    Thepresenceofthisonetimebufferwillgivemarketparticipants,aswellasthefirms

    themselves,confidenceinthecapacityofthemajorBHCstoperformtheirvitalroleinlendingevenif

    theeconomyprovesweakerthanexpected.

    IV.CalculationofAdditionalCapitaltoBuildSCAPBufferTocalculatetheamountofadditionalcapitaltobuildtheSCAPbuffer,supervisorsbeganwith

    estimatesofcreditandtradinglossesfromPPNRandALLLtoestimatethepretaxchangetoretained

    earnings.9 Pretaxchangestoretainedearningswereallocatedtoanaftertaxportionandataxrelated

    portionusinga35percentaveragetaxrate. Thetaxrelatedportionofanylosseswasappliedtothe

    9IfanalysisindicatedthattheALLLcouldbeloweratQ42010thanitwasatQ42008,thenthecommensurate

    reservereleasewasaddedtopreprovisionnetrevenueasanadditionallossabsorbingresource.

    7May2009 9Nov2009 BaselineScenario MoreAdverseScenario

    SCAPBufferHelpsEnsureAppropriateBankCapital

    intheMoreAdverseScenario

    InitialCapital and SCAPBuffer PossibleFutureOutcomes

    SCAP

    Buffer

    Appropriate

    CapitalLevels

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    17/38

    16

    stockoftotaldeferredtaxassetstoestimatetheproformavalue,inaccordancewithexistingcapital

    rules. Finally,aftertaxchangestoretainedearningswerecombinedwithprojectedpreferreddividend

    paymentstoestimatethechangeinequitycapitalandproformaequitycapitalforyearend2010.10 Pro

    formariskweightedassetsweredefinedasRWAfrom4Q2008plusanyassetsbroughtontothe

    balancesheetinaccordancewithFAS140.11

    ABHC

    was

    considered

    to

    require

    an

    additional

    SCAP

    buffer

    if

    its

    pro

    forma

    Tier

    1ratio

    was

    below6percentorifitsproformaTier1Commonratiowasbelow4percentattheendof2010. For

    manyfirms,ifabufferwasrequiredtomeettheTier1Commoncapitalratioof4percent,theadditional

    commonorcontingentcommonequitythatwouldberaisedwouldbesufficienttobringitsTier1ratio

    toorabove6percent.

    Theinitialsupplementalcapitalbufferestimatesarebasedonyearend2008capitalandrisk

    weightedassets,adjustedforFAS140. Theseestimatesthusdonotreflectdevelopmentsaffectingthe

    firmscapitalpositionsandcorporatestructuresincetheendoftheyear. Tocapturetheseeffects,the

    estimatesfortheinitialcapitalbufferswereadjustedtoreflectcertaincapitalactions,representinga

    directincreaseordecreaseinthedeterminationofcapitalneeds.Theseadjustmentswerebasedon

    informationsupplied

    by

    participating

    BHCs,

    subject

    to

    consultation

    and

    review

    by

    supervisors.

    Capital

    actionadjustmentsreflectfactorssuchascontractedmaterialsalesordispositionsofbusinesses,

    holdingsordiscontinuedoperations,contractedexchangesofsecuritieswithaBHCscapitalstructure,

    andtheamount(ifany)ofmandatoryconvertiblepreferredtoconverttocommonbyyearend2010.

    TheresultswerealsoadjustedtoreflectQ12009operatingperformance.Thefinalsupplementalcapital

    bufferistheinitialestimateplusorminustheimpactoftheseadjustments.

    V. IndicatedAdditionalCapitalBuffersunderSCAPV.A.AggregateSCAPBuffer

    Theinitial

    results

    using

    data

    through

    Q4

    2008

    suggest

    that

    the

    aggregate

    capital

    needed

    for

    the

    19BHCstoreachtheSCAPcapitalbuffertargetsinthemoreadversescenariois$185billion,thevast

    majorityofwhichneedstobeintheformofTier1Commoncapital(table2). Capitalneedsaremainly

    intheformofTier1Commoncapital,whichreflectsthefactthatwhilemanyinstitutionshavea

    sufficientamountofcapital,theyneedtotakestepstoimprovethequalityofthatcapital.

    ThefinalcapitalbufferincorporatescapitalactionsandtheimpactofQ12009operating

    performance. Theseadjustmentsaresubstantial,reflectingstrongpreprovisionnetrevenuesatsome

    firmsinthefirstquarterand,toamuchlargerdegree,effortsalreadytakenbysomefirmspriortothe

    conclusionoftheSCAPtoraisecommonequitybysellingsubsidiaries,convertingpreferredstock,or

    issuingcommonshares. Aftertakingintoaccountthecompletedorcontractedcapitalactionsandthe

    10Common

    dividends

    were

    assumed

    to

    be

    zero

    in

    the

    more

    adverse

    scenario.

    11Thesupervisorsconductingthecreditanalysisworkedcloselywithaccountingspecialistsintheagenciesto

    ensurethatthefirmsprojectionswereconsistentwithexistingaccountingstandards. Additionally,supervisors

    evaluatedthepotentialimpactofproposedchangestoFAS140andFIN46(R)whichareexpectedtobefinalizedin

    May2009andimplementedinJanuary2010. Theagenciesaccountingspecialistsdiscussedtheamendmentswith

    FASBmembersandstaffandotherexpertstoassessthereasonablenessoffirmestimatesofassetslikelytobe

    broughtontothebalancesheetstartingin2010asaresultoftheamendments. Theonboardingofassetswere

    alsofactoredintoourassessmentofriskweightedassetsandtheassociatedALLLneeds.

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    18/38

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    19/38

    18

    Appendix: InstitutionSpecificResults

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    20/38

    19

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 10.1 9.7%

    Tier1CommonCapital 10.1 9.7%

    RiskWeightedAssets 104.4

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 11.2

    FirstLienMortgages na na

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages na na

    Commercialand

    Industrial

    Loans

    na

    na

    CommercialRealEstateLoans na na

    CreditCardLoans 8.5 20.2%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) na na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 2.7 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 11.9

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPBufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 NoNeed

    Less:CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 0.2

    SCAPBuffer NoNeed

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowance

    forloanandleaselosses

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    MoreAdverseScenario

    AmericanExpressCompany

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforAmericanExpressCompanyfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    21/38

    20

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 173.2 10.6%

    Tier1CommonCapital 74.5 4.6%

    RiskWeightedAssets 1,633.8

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 136.6

    FirstLienMortgages 22.1 6.8%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 21.4 13.5%

    Commercialand

    Industrial

    Loans 15.7 7.0%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 9.4 9.1%

    CreditCardLoans 19.1 23.5%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 8.5 na

    Trading&Counterparty 24.1 na

    Other(1) 16.4 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments 13.3

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 74.5

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 46.5

    Less:CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 10.9

    OtherCapitalActions(4) 1.8

    SCAPBuffer 33.9

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations(2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowance

    forloanandleaselosses

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    (4)Capitalbenefitfromriskweightedassetimpactofeligibleassetguarantee

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    MoreAdverseScenario

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforBankofAmericaCorporationfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    BankofAmericaCorporation

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    22/38

    21

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 13.4 12.3%

    Tier1CommonCapital 7.8 7.1%

    RiskWeightedAssets 109.8

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 8.7

    FirstLienMortgages 1.1 4.5%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 0.7 8.8%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 0.7 4.5%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 4.5 12.6%

    CreditCardLoans 0.2 18.2%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 0.2 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 1.3 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 5.5

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 NoNeed

    Less:

    CapitalActions

    and

    Effects

    of

    Q1

    2009

    Results

    (3) 0.1

    SCAPBuffer NoNeed

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforBB&TCorporationfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    BB&TCorporation

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    23/38

    22

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 15.4 13.3%

    Tier1CommonCapital 11.0 9.5%

    RiskWeightedAssets 115.8

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 5.4

    FirstLienMortgages 0.2 5.0%

    Second/JuniorLien

    Mortgages

    na

    na

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 0.4 5.0%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 0.2 9.9%

    CreditCardLoans na na

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 4.2 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 0.4 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 6.7

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbuffer

    is

    defined

    as

    additional

    Tier

    1Common/contingent

    Common)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 NoNeed

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 0.2

    SCAPBuffer NoNeed

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforTheBankofNewYorkMellonCorporationfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    TheBankofNewYorkMellon

    Corporation

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    24/38

    23

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 16.8 12.7%

    Tier1CommonCapital 12.0 9.1%

    RiskWeightedAssets 131.8

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 13.4

    FirstLienMortgages 1.8 10.7%

    Second/JuniorLien

    Mortgages 0.7 19.9%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 1.5 9.7%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 1.1 6.0%

    CreditCardLoans 3.6 18.2%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 0.4 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 4.3 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments 1.5

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 9.0

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbuffer

    is

    defined

    as

    additional

    Tier

    1Common/contingent

    Common)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 NoNeed

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 0.3

    SCAPBuffer NoNeed

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforCapitalOneFinancialCorporationfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    CapitalOneFinancial

    Corporation

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    25/38

    24

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 118.8 11.9%

    Tier1CommonCapital 22.9 2.3%

    RiskWeightedAssets 996.2

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 104.7

    FirstLienMortgages 15.3 8.0%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 12.2 19.5%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 8.9 5.8%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 2.7 7.4%

    CreditCardLoans 19.9 23.0%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 2.9 na

    Trading&Counterparty 22.4 na

    Other(1) 20.4 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 49.0

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 92.6

    Less:Capital

    Actions

    and

    Effects

    of

    Q1

    2009

    Results

    (3) 29.0

    OtherCapitalActions(4) 58.1

    SCAPBuffer 5.5

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    (4)IncludesimpactofpreferredexchangeoffersannouncedonFebruary27,2009

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforCitigroup,Inc.fortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    Citigroup,Inc.

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    26/38

    25

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 11.9 10.6%

    Tier1CommonCapital 4.9 4.4%

    RiskWeightedAssets 112.6

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 9.1

    FirstLienMortgages 1.1 10.3%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 1.1 8.7%

    Commercialand

    Industrial

    Loans 2.8 11.0%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 2.9 13.9%

    CreditCardLoans 0.4 22.3%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 0.05 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 0.9 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 5.5

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAP

    Buffer

    as

    of

    December

    31,

    2008 2.6

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 1.5

    SCAPBuffer 1.1

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforFifthThirdBancorpfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    FifthThirdBancorp

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    27/38

    26

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 17.4 10.1%

    Tier1CommonCapital 11.1 6.4%

    RiskWeightedAssets 172.7

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses 9.2

    FirstLienMortgages 2.0 10.2%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 1.1 21.2%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 1.0 2.7%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 0.6 33.3%

    CreditCardLoans na na

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 0.5 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 4.0 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 0.5

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 6.7

    Less:

    CapitalActions

    and

    Effects

    of

    Q1

    2009

    Results

    (3)

    4.8

    SCAPBuffer(4) 11.5

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    (4)Firmneedstoaugmentthecapitalbufferwith$11.5billionofTier1Common/contingentCommon

    ofwhich$9.1billionmustbenewTier1capital

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    MoreAdverseScenario

    GMACLLC

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforGMACLLCfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    28/38

    27

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 55.9 12.6%

    Tier1CommonCapital 34.4 7.7%

    RiskWeightedAssets 444.8

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 17.8

    FirstLienMortgages na na

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages na na

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 0.01 1.2%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans na na

    CreditCard

    Loans

    na

    na

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 0.1 na

    Trading&Counterparty 17.4 na

    Other(1) 0.3 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 18.5

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 NoNeed

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 7.0

    SCAPBuffer No

    Need

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforTheGoldmanSachsGroup,Inc.fortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    TheGoldman

    Sachs

    Group,

    Inc.

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    29/38

    28

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 136.2 10.2%

    Tier1CommonCapital 87.0 6.5%

    RiskWeightedAssets 1,337.5

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 97.4

    FirstLienMortgages 18.8 10.2%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 20.1 13.9%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 10.3 6.8%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 3.7 5.5%

    CreditCardLoans 21.2 22.4%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 1.2 na

    Trading&Counterparty 16.7 na

    Other(1) 5.3 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments 19.9

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 72.4

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 NoNeed

    Less:

    CapitalActions

    and

    Effects

    of

    Q1

    2009

    Results

    (3) 2.5

    SCAPBuffer NoNeed

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforJPMorganChase&Co.fortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    JPMorganChase

    &

    Co.

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    30/38

    29

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 11.6 10.9%

    Tier1CommonCapital 6.0 5.6%

    RiskWeightedAssets 106.7

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 6.7

    FirstLienMortgages 0.1 3.4%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 0.6 6.3%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 1.7 7.9%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 2.3 12.5%

    CreditCard

    Loans 0.002 37.9%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 0.1 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 1.8 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 2.1

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 2.5

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 0.6

    SCAPBuffer 1.8

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforKeyCorpfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    KeyCorp

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    31/38

    30

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 30.1 9.2%

    Tier1CommonCapital 27.8 8.5%

    RiskWeightedAssets 326.4

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 9.6

    FirstLienMortgages 0.03 5.0%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 0.01 14.1%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 0.0 0.0%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 0.8 2.1%

    CreditCard

    Loans

    na

    na

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 8.3 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 0.5 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 5.6

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 NoNeed

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 0.6

    SCAPBuffer No

    Need

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforMetLife,Inc.fortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    MetLife,Inc.

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    32/38

    31

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 47.2 15.2%

    Tier1CommonCapital 17.8 5.7%

    RiskWeightedAssets 310.6

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 19.7

    FirstLienMortgages na na

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages na na

    Commercialand

    Industrial

    Loans 0.1 2.4%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 0.6 45.2%

    CreditCardLoans na na

    Securities(AFSandHTM) na na

    Trading&Counterparty 18.7 na

    Other(1) 0.2 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 7.1

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAP

    Buffer

    as

    of

    December

    31,

    2008 8.3

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 6.5

    SCAPBuffer 1.8

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforMorganStanleyfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    MorganStanley

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    33/38

    32

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 24.1 9.6%

    Tier1CommonCapital 11.7 4.7%

    RiskWeightedAssets 250.9

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 18.8

    FirstLienMortgages 2.4 8.1%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 4.6 12.7%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 3.2 6.0%

    CommercialReal

    Estate

    Loans 4.5 11.2%

    CreditCardLoans 0.4 22.3%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 1.3 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 2.3 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments 5.9

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 9.6

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    Indicated

    SCAP

    Buffer

    as

    of

    December

    31,

    2008 2.3Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 1.7

    SCAPBuffer 0.6

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforPNCFinancialServicesGroup,Inc.fortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    PNCFinancial

    Services

    Group,

    Inc.

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    34/38

    33

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 12.1 10.4%

    Tier1CommonCapital 7.6 6.6%

    RiskWeightedAssets 116.3

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses 9.2

    FirstLienMortgages 1.0 4.1%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 1.1 11.9%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 1.2 7.0%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 4.9 13.7%

    CreditCardLoans na na

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 0.2 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 0.8 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 3.3

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 2.9

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 0.4

    SCAPBuffer(4) 2.5

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    (4)Firmneedstoaugmentthecapitalbufferwith$2.5billionofTier1Common/contingentCommonofwhich$400millionmustbenewTier1

    capital

    MoreAdverseScenario

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    Regions

    Financial

    Corporation

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforRegionsFinancialCorporationfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    35/38

    34

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 14.1 20.2%

    Tier1CommonCapital 10.8 15.5%

    RiskWeightedAssets 69.6

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 8.2

    FirstLienMortgages na na

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages na na

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 0.04 22.8%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 0.3 35.5%

    CreditCard

    Loans

    na

    na

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 1.8 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 6.0 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 4.3

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 NoNeed

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 0.2

    SCAPBuffer No

    Need

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforStateStreetCorporationfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    StateStreet

    Corporation

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    36/38

    35

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 17.6 10.9%

    Tier1CommonCapital 9.4 5.8%

    RiskWeightedAssets 162.0

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 11.8

    FirstLienMortgages 2.2 8.2%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 3.1 13.7%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 1.5 5.2%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 2.8 10.6%

    CreditCard

    Loans 0.1 17.4%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 0.02 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 2.1 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 4.7

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 3.4

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 1.3

    SCAPBuffer 2.2

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforSunTrustBanks,Inc.fortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    SunTrustBanks,

    Inc.

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    37/38

    36

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 24.4 10.6%

    Tier1CommonCapital 11.8 5.1%

    RiskWeightedAssets 230.6

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 15.7

    FirstLienMortgages 1.8 5.7%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 1.7 8.8%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 2.3 5.4%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 3.2 10.2%

    CreditCard

    Loans 2.8 20.3%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 1.3 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 2.8 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments na

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 13.7

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 NoNeed

    Less: CapitalActionsandEffectsofQ12009Results(3) 0.3

    SCAPBuffer No

    Need

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforU.S.BancorpfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadversethan

    expected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    U.S.Bancorp

    MoreAdverseScenario

  • 8/14/2019 Stress Test Results

    38/38

    AtDecember31,2008 $Billions As%ofRWA

    Tier1Capital 86.4 8.0%

    Tier1CommonCapital 33.9 3.1%

    RiskWeightedAssets 1,082.3

    Estimatedfor2009and2010fortheMoreAdverseScenario $Billions As%ofLoans

    TotalEstimatedLosses(Beforepurchaseaccountingadjustments) 86.1

    FirstLienMortgages 32.4 11.9%

    Second/JuniorLienMortgages 14.7 13.2%

    CommercialandIndustrialLoans 9.0 4.8%

    CommercialRealEstateLoans 8.4 5.9%

    CreditCardLoans 6.1 26.0%

    Securities(AFSandHTM) 4.2 na

    Trading&Counterparty na na

    Other(1) 11.3 na

    Memo:PurchaseAccountingAdjustments 23.7

    ResourcesOtherThanCapitaltoAbsorbLosses(2) 60.0

    SCAPBufferAddedforMoreAdverseScenario

    (SCAPbufferisdefinedasadditionalTier1Common/contingentCommon)

    IndicatedSCAPBufferasofDecember31,2008 17.3

    Less:

    CapitalActions

    and

    Effects

    of

    Q1

    2009

    Results

    (3) 3.6

    SCAPBuffer 13.7

    (1)Includesotherconsumerandnonconsumerloansandmiscellaneouscommitmentsandobligations

    (3)CapitalactionsincludecompletedorcontractedtransactionssinceQ42008

    Note:Numbersmaynotsumduetorounding

    SupervisoryCapitalAssessmentProgram

    EstimatesforWellsFargo&CompanyBankHoldingCompanyfortheMoreAdverseEconomicScenario

    Theestimatesbelowrepresentahypothetical'whatif'scenariothatinvolvesaneconomicoutcomethatismoreadverse

    thanexpected. Theseestimatesarenotforecastsofexpectedlossesorrevenues.

    (2)Resourcestoabsorblossesincludepreprovisionnetrevenuelessthechangeintheallowanceforloanandleaselosses

    WellsFargo

    &

    Company

    MoreAdverseScenario