35
STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo Share your hopes for the night

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK

Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2

March 16, 2015

#EdVoicesRITweet your thoughts on Prototype II

Post a photoShare your hopes for the night

Page 2: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

2-min Meet & GreetLook back on your own childhood experience as a PK-12 learner. What’s your fondest school memory?

What does that STORY teach us about this work and imagining Rhode Island education at its very best?

Page 3: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

WHERE ARE WE? ADT Process

Page 4: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

SRT ROLE & SCHEDULE~Provide feedback to ADT between each prototype iteration

Values

The 5-7 core principles that will be the drivers of the plan and the litmus test for eventual content

Priority Areas & Key Outcomes

Approximately 5 high level priority areas with ~ 3 key outcomes that characterize each

Strategies

The 3-5 significant actions that RIDE will take over the next five years to advance each priority areas and achieve the key outcomes

Established by RIDE:

Measureable Objectives, Resourcing, and Operational Plans

2/2 SRT Survey:Values Feedback

3/16 SRT Mtg:Priorities Feedback5:30-7:30p

4/27 SRT Mtg:Strategies Feedback5:30-7:30p

Late May, All Teams:Statewide Conversationto ready for local adoption and implementation1-day

2/26 SRT Launch:Priorities Input

Page 5: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Values = Why?

Priority Areas = What?

Strategies = How?

Page 6: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

HOW DID WE GET HERE?

Page 7: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Developing Priorities, Feb to now

Quantitative Survey Results

ADT Micro Interviews Big Bets

Local Level RIisReady Reports

Macro Level McKinsey

Report

Homework Indiv

Priorities

Big Bets

ADT

www.RIisReady.org• Pre-K Education in Rhode

Island: What We’ve Heard• Rhode Island Is Ready:

Culturally Grounding Field Work Results

ADT meetings, online collaboration and homework:• reviewed draft priority statements

from 2/25 • reviewed big bet summaries from

RIDE and SRT • Provided feedback and drafted

potential new priorities.

Page 8: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Education Exchange Hosts

Page 9: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

VALUES EXERCISE

Review & Prioritize

Page 10: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

The Values YES TESTIs the value…1. Close to our hearts? •Does it makes you think: •“Heck yes!” •“Of course!”•“Doesn’t this go without saying?”

Can it be used as…2. The North Star for our work? • A concept so important it cannot

be abandoned or ignored.• “Everything we do can support

and be guided by this value.”

Is the statement…3. Content neutral?• Not specific to only a single part of our

work• meaningful to everyone, without jargon.• It makes you think, “This makes sense. I

don’t need specific context or explanations to understand it.”

Page 11: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Dot Vote Top 5

Review the revised value statements.

Turn and Talk with a partner:✓Passes values yes test?✓Critical to our plan?✓Adds a new perspective to our work?✓Shared by many, both in the room and in the

State?✓Not redundant?

Place your dots on your top 5

Page 12: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

PRIORITIES EXERCISE

Review & Rank

Page 13: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Using our Priority Yes Test

Page 14: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Reviewing Priorities – Part A (5 min):

•Review the priority statements

• Individually, rank the priorities on your handout, Highest (1) to Lowest (7)

Page 15: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Priorities – go to table:

• Personalized Learning

• Global Competency 

• Early Childhood Education 

• Partnerships 

• Resource Investment 

• Assessment Practices 

• Professional Learning

Choose one of your top three priorities and join a table group (8 max per table)

Page 16: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Reviewing Priorities – Part B:

In your table groups, discuss: • If you could only choose 3 of these priorities, which 3 would you choose to work together to produce the greatest positive impact?  Why?

• Is there a missing priority?

• Capture feedback notes on your worksheet

Page 17: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

FILTERING PRIORITIES

Page 18: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Filtering – Which set of priorities should make the final plan?

•Aligned to our values •The collection of priorities should be aligned to our values and help us to realize them.

Page 19: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Filtering – Which set of priorities should make the final plan?• Focused, Coherent, and Synergistic

• A few, key carefully considered actions to focus the system’s work on that, when put together, create a powerful engine for systemic improvement

• Priorities are tightly interrelated and complementary

Page 20: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

What will success look like?

• Potential for significant impact on student outcomes

• The combination of priorities have the potential to make positive impact on students

Page 21: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

SUGGESTING STRATEGIES

Page 22: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Values = Why?

Priority Areas = What?

Strategies = How?

Page 23: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Who can enact the strategies?

RIDE

Community Partners

Local Education Agencies

Page 24: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Strategy Defined

• Definition of Strategy: the major actions that will occur to advance the priorities and achieve the key outcomes.

• Role of Strategy: Strategies describe the bodies of work at a high-level and with clarity, but do not prescribe work plans or fine-grained tasks.

•  

Page 25: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Strategy BRAINSTORM – by Priority Area

In your PRIORITY table groups, discuss suggested strategies (HOW’s) needed to advance your priority statement and achieve key outcomes. 

Capture on chart paper provided.

Page 26: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

PROTOTYPE 2 SRT FEEDBACK

DUE THIS WEEK

Page 27: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Prototype 2 SRT Feedback

•On your own, submit your feedback using the Cycle 2 prototype survey link

•Complete ASAP; will close Sunday March 22

•Feedback will be summarized for ADT

Page 28: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

What’s next, after tonight…

• Wider Engagement for Inputs• Beginning community partner convenings: “Education Exchange”

• Externally facilitated, run and hosted (not by RIDE!)

• For ADT, based on SRT feedback:• Refining values, priorities

• Getting into strategies

Page 29: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

#EdVoicesRITweet your thoughts on Prototype II

Post a photo

Share an appreciation, key learning, hope

Page 30: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Values Defined

• Definition of Value: a set of beliefs that have profound and enduring meaning and can (and should) be visible in every major decision we make and in the educational system we manage.

• Role of Values: Value statements unify our team, and later, our state around a common purpose.

Page 31: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

What a value is NOT

• A big bet• A key priority

Page 32: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Testing the Filter on Actual Examples

•Does “Quality teachers and administrators” pass the test?

•Where is the value that it’s trying to get at?

• How does it do with our filter?• Close to your heart – the

soul/foundation of the plan, strong belief, core aspiration

• North Star for the system – guide for all major priorities in the plan and later for implementation

• Content neutral – clear and understandable concept, absent of jargon, not specific to single part of education system

Page 33: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Developing Values: “Yes” Test 1.28.15

2. The North Star for our work? • A concept so important it cannot be

abandoned or ignored.• “Everything we do can support and be

guided by this value.”

3. Content neutral?• Not specific to only a single part of our

work• meaningful to everyone, without jargon.• It makes you think, “This makes sense. I

don’t need specific context or explanations to understand it.”

Is the value…1. Close to our hearts? •Does it makes you think: •“Heck yes!” •“Of course!”•“Doesn’t this go without saying?”

Can it be used as… Is the statement…

Page 34: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Using our Priority Yes Test

Page 35: STRATEGIC PLANNING PROTOTYPE II FEEDBACK Strategy Review Team (SRT) Meetup #2 March 16, 2015 #EdVoicesRI Tweet your thoughts on Prototype II Post a photo

Priority? Let’s discuss.

Is it a priority?

Priority Tests

•Ex. 2 – Giving each child a laptop• The Action: a specific action that can make a significant impact

• The Data: informed by data and best practices

• The Umbrella: covers all the major subparts that make up the idea – it is the stand alone big idea

• The Balance Beam: balances a focus on future vision with present problem solving. It is aspirational and audacious.