Upload
kaitlynn-allgood
View
220
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Strategic Planning of Port Infrastructure
Marc EvertsePort of Rotterdam International
Brasilia, 25th of November 2008
Example of infrastructure development:the Port of Rotterdam
1800 - 1900
1400 - 1800
1800 - 1900
1920 - 1940
1946 - 1960
1960 - 1970
1970 – 2015
2015
Classification of ports
First generation – classical type, only cargo handling
Second generation - plus industry cluster within port limits
Third generation - plus logistic/ distribution services
Generation determines the character of a port, not the size
Each generation requires different infrastructure
Indispensable elements of strategic port planning
Traffic forecasting
Space / clustering
Hinterland connections
Organisation
Environment
Employment / added value
Maasvlakte 2 project
The reason:
Long term supply/demand outlook
The design
Technical features of MV2 project
The construction
Construction tendering process
The exploitation:
Commercial procedure
Forecast vs realisation
Container handling Rotterdamrealisation vs forecasts
4,00
5,00
6,00
7,00
8,00
9,00
10,00
11,00
12,00
13,00
14,00
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
mln
TEU realisation
V2020 - DE
V2020 - GCN
MLT-forecasts
Functional specifications (1)
Gross area 2,000 ha
Net area 1,000 ha
A 20% increase in port area in the Port of Rotterdam
Use of area for economic activities:
Containers: 620 ha,
Distribution: 170 ha
Chemicals: 210 ha
Managed and financed by the Port of Rotterdam;
shareholders are the Dutch government and the
Municipality of Rotterdam
Functional specifications (2)
Design vessel 12.500 TEU
Modal split; 35% road, 20% rail, 45% barge
High productivity figures
Area productivity 27.500 TEU/ha/year
Berth productivity 1.500 TEU/m/year
Design philosophy
Flexibility, flexibility and flexibility to cope with the expected changes in port business during the development period of the project (up to 2035)
Make the choices that have to be made right now, leave the rest to be decided in a later stage
Phased development. Construct outer contour. Phased reclamation and infrastructure development based on client demand
Fixed budget, required IRR
Research, waves and currents
Golfhoogte- en golfrichtingverdeling tijdens NW 8 Bft. De oranje kleur geeft een golfhoogte van ca. 5.5 m aan, de kleur blauw golven tot ca. 1 m.
Golfhoogte- en golfrichtingverdeling tijdens NW 8 Bft. De oranje kleur geeft een golfhoogte van ca. 5.5 m aan, de kleur blauw golven tot ca. 1 m.
Phased development MV2
MV2 market demand in relation to MV2 supply
-2468
10121416
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
MV2 market demand MV2 supply
84
6767
77
81
81
81
90
2014 2020 2025 2030
MV2 Market demand (mln teu) 0,7 3,8 8,7 14,1
Tender process - objectives
Finance
Better prices, better conditions, less risk
Investigate customers Business Case
Strategy and marketing
Additional cargo, more competion, captive cargo
Sustainability
EMS, Modal split, security
Technical
Quality of handling, flexibility of operation
Landlord portDivision of responsibilities
Port of Rotterdam
Nautical entrance, fairway and management
Terminals, sites, quaywalls, public infrastructure, rail, road and utilities upto the boundary
Management and maintenance
Private company
Superstructure, cranes, rolling equipment, buildings, staff, computer systems, gate
Management and maintenance
Port of Rotterdam InternationalMain objective: participations
Focussing on participation in (new) ports in countries of strategic interest (f.i. BRIC countries)
Participation in the form of a Port Management Company with local authorities and private companies as partners
No terminal operations
Provision of infrastructure, nautical safety and environment
Acquisition of industry and terminal operators
Long term planning
Second objective: ‘boardroom’ consultancy
Provision of strategic “boardroom” consultancy in countries of interest:
Long-term relationship with local government
Strategic advice on port development
Provision of second opinion
Supporting PoR’s commercial objectives: enhancement of cargo flows between Rotterdam and certain countries/regions
Regulates according to Good International Practices
Attracts world-class operators
Facilitates common services
Leases land, jetties and quays
Provides infrastructure
Encourages clusters
Facilitates training & human resource development
SIPC as a LANDLORD
Markets the Port
And industrial area
Support community
Port of Sohar
Port of Rotterdam Internationalnew opportunities
India – Port West in Gujarat
Brazil – Port of Suape in Pernambuco
Malaysia – Port of Lahad Datu in Sabah
Brazil - Port of Suapecharacteristics
‘brownfield’ port
Deep water (16-18 m)
Ample space: 3000 additional port area
Good hinterland connections
Much interest from heavy and light industry
Management willing to form a partnership with PoR
Win-win situation joint venture:advantages for Rotterdam
Commercial / financial
Access to fast growing economies
Network expansion
Utilisation of skills and experience
Spreading the ‘brand’ of the Port of Rotterdam
Synergies with Rotterdam (cargo flows)
Win-win situation join venture:advantages for partner
Commercial / financial
Access to Port of Rotterdam’s know-how and experience
Access to other Rotterdam based know-how and experience
Trustworthy port manager for port users
Enhanced acquisition of new port business / investments
Enhanced development of the (new) port
Economic development of the country/region
Conclusions / question
Brazil: fast growing, big economy
Brazil is in need of new port infrastructure
Rotterdam: ample know-how and experience in all port related matters
Rotterdam practices strategic port development abroad
Is there a perfect match: a win-win situation between Brazil and the Port of Rotterdam?