Upload
nguyenxuyen
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ContentsAcronyms Council..........................................................................................................................3
Message from the President of the Council...................................................................................5Message from the CEO.................................................................................................................7PART A: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW................................................................................................81.Purpose and Values of the ECSA...............................................................................................8 Vision............................................................................................................................................8 Mission.........................................................................................................................................8 Values...........................................................................................................................................81.1. Legislative Revisions..............................................................................................................81.2. Legislative Mandates..............................................................................................................81.3. Policy mandates...................................................................................................................101.4 Relevant Court rulings...........................................................................................................102 Macro Situational Analysis and Performance Environment......................................................102.1 Performance Environment.....................................................................................................122.2 Organisational Environment..................................................................................................132.3 Description of the strategic planning process........................................................................153 Strategic outcome-oriented goals of the ECSA........................................................................19PART B: STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES...........................................................................................214 Aligning ECSA objectives to the mandate.................................................................................215 PROGRAMMES........................................................................................................................235.1 Programme 1: Education and Registration............................................................................235.1.1 Resource considerations....................................................................................................285.1.2 Risk Management...............................................................................................................285.2 Programme 2: Public awareness of the engineering profession...........................................285.2.1 Resource considerations …………………………………………………………....................305.2.2 Risk Management………....................................................................................................305.3 Programme 3: Proactive response to Socio-Economic requirements...................................305.3.1 Resource considerations....................................................................................................325.3.2 Risk Management…………………………………………………………………………..........325.4 Programme 4: A sustainable, transformed and coherent organisation..................................325.3.1 Resource considerations....................................................................................................335.3.2 Risk Management ………………………………………………………….................………...336 Financial Resources.................................................................................................................33Programme 1. Education and Registration..................................................................................34Programme 2: Public awareness of the engineering profession.................................................37Programme 3: Proactive response to Socio-Economic requirements.........................................38Programme 4: A sustainable, transformed and coherent Organisational....................................407 Governance..............................................................................................................................42PART C: LINKS TO OTHER PLANS...........................................................................................501. Risk Management Plan...........................................................................................................502. Fraud Prevention Plan.............................................................................................................503. Materiality Framework.............................................................................................................50
Acronyms and Definitions Used in the Plan:APP Annual Performance Plan BBBEE Broad Based Black Economic EmpowermentBE Built EnvironmentBEE Black Economic EmpowermentBEPs Built Environment ProfessionsBEPCs Built Environment Professional CouncilsCBE Council for the Built EnvironmentCEO Chief Executive Officer CERTEC Certificated Engineers Accreditation committeeCHE Council for Higher EducationCPD Continuing Professional Development CRC Central Registration CommitteeC & U Commitment and Undertakings DHET Department of Higher Education and TrainingDoE Department of EducationDPW Department of Public WorksEC Education CommitteeECSA Engineering Council of South AfricaEEA Employment Equity ActEMI Engineers mobility ForumEPA Engineering Profession Act, 2000 (Act no. 46 of 2000)EPAC Engineering Programme Accreditation Committee ESGB Engineering Standards Generating BodyF&S Finance and staff committeeHEQC Higher Education Quality CommitteeHR Human Resources IAC International Affairs CommitteeIDoW Identification of WorkIDoEW Identification of Engineering WorkIC Investigations committeeIETA International engineering Technologist mobility forumIPEA International Professional Engineers Agreement IT Information TechnologyMinister Minister of Public WorksMoU Memorandum of UnderstandingMTBPS Medium Term Budget Policy StatementMTEF Medium Term Expenditure FrameworkMTSF Medium Term Strategic FrameworkNIP National Infrastructure Plan NDP National Development Plan NRS New Registration System PAIA Promotion of Access to Information ActPAJA Promotion of Administrative Justice ActPDI Previously Disadvantaged IndividualsPESTEL Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental and Legal FactorsPIA Protection of Information ActPICC Presidential Infrastructure Coordinating CommitteePIP Property Incubator ProgrammePFMA Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act 1 of 1999)QC Quality CouncilsQCTO Quality Council for Trades and Occupations
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
2 3
QMS Quality Management Systems RSA Republic of South AfricaSAC Strategic Advisory CommitteeSAQA South African Qualifications AuthoritySCM Supply Chain Management SIPs Strategic Integrated Projects SLA Service Level AgreementSOE State Owned Entities SWOT Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and ThreatsTC Transformation committeeTPAC Technology Programme Accreditation committeeTVET Technical and Vocational Educational and Training VAs Voluntary AssociationsWFEO World Federation of Engineering Organisations
Message from the President of the CouncilThe world of engineering is an ever changing landscape because of the need to keep up with the socio-economic demands. The Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA) has been given a legislative mandate to regulate the engineering profession. ECSA must also contribute in the development of a stable engineering environment that balances supply and demand. It is also important to uphold the integrity of the profession. The registration process should be rigorous and of high standard whilst retaining the principles of transparency and fairness. All registered persons must conduct themselves in an ethical manner at all times. It is therefore our legislative mandate to ensure that those engineers who are registered with us adhere to the spirit and the letter of the conduct of registered persons.
In this report, we show how ECSA business impacts on the macro-environmental factors such as the triple challenges of unemployment, inequality and poverty within the context of South Africa. As a result, we have partnered with government as we promote the realization of the National Development Plan (Vision 2030). Our continuous engagement with the Presidential Infrastructure Coordinating Committee through our Thought Leadership Forum is an effort to facilitate and nurture the culture of innovation and research within the Built Environment. We envisage that our core business between 2015 and 2020 will be focussed on supporting the development priorities of government by developing a reliable pipeline of engineering skills.
The strategic alignment between the Department of Public Works (DPW), Council for the Built Environment (CBE) and ECSA is a strategic partnership that seeks to enhance the engineering profession through cooperation and using shared resources. This will eventually translate to meaningful support of the government mandate.
The development of the annual performance plan has been a rigorous process where the first phase involved preparation and gathering of information from internal and external stakeholders. The second phase was analysis and synthesis of information in order to come up with a plausible support model for delivering the mandate of ECSA. We therefore commend ECSA staff for a job well done in concluding this plan. Lastly, the committees of Council had to be realigned to the new organogram structure as approved by Council in order to achieve a well functional operational plan. This clearly redefines the roles of committees and seeks to
alleviate duplication where necessary. This will enhance effectiveness and efficiency of ECSA. I am therefore pleased to deliver the strategic document and the Annual Performance Plan of ECSA for 2015 to 2020 and 2015/16 financial years respectively as documents that will guide us to achieve our mandate and continue to support the socio-economic mandate of government.
Yours sincerely
_____________________________
Mr. Cyril Vuyani Gamede, Pr EngPresident: ECSA
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
4 5
Official Sign-Off__
________________________
Cyril Gamade (Mr)President: ECSA
___________________________Sipho Madonsela (Mr)Chief Executive Officer
Message from the CEOThe main focus on ECSA business has been to facilitate transformational drives within the organisation. This has proven to be a mammoth task considering that our internal operations are by and large influenced by our external stakeholders, which we do not, most often than not, have control over. However, we pride ourselves with the inroads that we have made notwithstanding all challenges embedded deep within the organisational legacy.
The imperatives of this Annual Performance Plan (APP) are aimed at demonstrating the relevance of ECSA to South Africa, within the continent of Africa and around the globe in the next five years. We are working hard to put the reputation of ECSA in a better light and to give our clientele the kind of service that is due to them. This effort is being enforced by the adjustments that are currently underway to align the organogram with the overall strategy. This new strategy is aimed at repositioning ECSA in order to retain the professionals who are already registered and to appeal to the new and upcoming generation of engineers as the regulator of choice.
We have developed 4 strategic outcome oriented goals which will set us at a momentous trajectory. These goals are aimed at addressing matters relating to providing a conducive professional engineering registration environment for practitioners, public awareness of the profession, high impact socio-economic interventions in response to national and other priorities and lastly, forming a sustainable, transparent and coherent or-ganisation. Moreover, an effort has been done in aligning ECSA objectives to the mandate and to answer a question of how we can add value to the political and economic imperatives facing South Africa.
The New Registration System (NRS) is in the process of being implemented in order to simplify the process of registration. In our road shows throughout the country in 2014 we were confronted with the quest from engineering practitioners who are willing to be part of the roll-out of this system and the appreciation for its simplicity and accessibility. This is one of the ways which we are using to increase our efficiency and also improve the number of registered persons in South Africa. The increased pool of registered persons means an increased number of competent engineering practitioners, which in turn translates to improved quality of engineering work within our communities.
In order to fully professionalize the environment, we envisage forging relationship with the employers, es-pecially those offering services in the public space, in order to give ECSA an opportunity to ensure that their employees are professionally registered. Moreover, it will create conducive employment conditions to abide by the code of conduct.
Let me end off by congratulating the ECSA staff for all the hard work that has been demonstrated in putting the 2015/16 Annual Performance Plan together. I have to attest to the fact that it is a well-thought through document and, if implemented to the letter, it will take ECSA to the new and lofty heights.
Yours truly,
___________________________
Mr. Sipho Madonsela, Pr EngChief Executive Officer
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
6 7
PART A: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
1. Purpose and Values of the ECSA Vision
Engineering excellence, transforming the nation
Mission
ECSA seeks to achieve this vision through:• Determining standards for education and accreditation of educational programmes as well as registration
of Engineering Practitioners• Developing and sustaining a relevant, transformed, competent and internationally recognized engineering
profession• Educating the public on expected engineering quality standards and protecting the interests of the public
against sub-standard quality of engineering work• Regulatory efforts to ensure environmental protection; and• Engaging with Government to support national priorities
Values
• Professional – Conduct beyond reproach to the highest ethical standards underpinned by quality, timeli-ness, trust and respect
• Accountable – Doing what we commit to do in an environment of trust and respect and being answerable for our failures to meet our committed obligations
• Collaborative – Working as a team to achieve exceptional results• Transparent – Honest and open communication and sharing of information between stakeholders
Revisions to Legislative and other Mandates
1.1. Legislative Revisions
No legislative revisions have been made to the Engineering Professions Act, (EPA,) to date, however the Council recognises that there is a need to review the dated Act as some parts of the Act inhibit the Council to execute its mandate. Council plans to engage the Minister of Public Works through the CBE to make proposals with a view to review the Act. It should be noted that in May 2013, the Ministry of Public Works gazetted the BEP policy review proposing amendments of the statutory regulatory framework, but not much was achieved from the process.
1.2. Legislative Mandates
The ECSA is established by section 2 of the EPA with the mandate to regulate the engineering Profession. There are other regulatory prescripts in the country that have a direct or indirect bearing on the operations of the Council. The following are some of the many legislations, regulations and policies that ECSA must observe:
Short Title of The Act Purpose of the ActRepublic of South Africa Constitution of 1996
The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. No other law or government action can supersede the provisions of the Constitution.
Consumer Protection Act 2011 To promote a fair, accessible and sustainable marketplace for the consumer.
Construction Industry Development Board Act, 2000
To provide for the establishment of the Construction Industry Development Board; and matters incidental thereto.
Council for the Built Environment Act, 2000
To provide for the establishment of the Council For the Built Environment and matters incidental thereto.
Architectural Profession Act, 2000
To provide for the establishment of the Council for the Architectural Profession and matters incidental thereto.
Landscape Architectural Professional Act,2000
To provide for the establishment of the Council for the Landscape Architectural Profession and matters incidental thereto.
Engineering Profession of South Africa,2000
To provide for the establishment of the Council for the Engineering Profession and matters incidental thereto.
Project and Construction Management Profession Act, 2000
To provide for the establishment of the Council for the Project and Construction Management Profession and matters incidental thereto.
Quantity Surveying Profession Act, 2000
To provide for the establishment of the Council for the Quantity Surveying Profession and matters incidental thereto.
Property Valuers Profession Act of 2000
To provide for the establishment of the Council for the Property Valuation Profession and matters incidental thereto.
Public Finance Management Act of 1999
To regulate financial management and to ensure that all revenue, expenditure, assets and liabilities of Government departments or entities are managed efficiently and effectively.
Skills Development Act 97 of 1998
To govern training, education and skills development in the workplace.
Employment Equity Act Applies to all employers and workers and protects workers and job seekers from unfair discrimination, and also provides a framework for implementing affirmative action.
Promotion of Administrative Justice Act of 2000
To give effect to the right to administrative action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair and to the right to written reasons for administrative action as contemplated in section 33 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996; and to provide for matters incidental thereto.
Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000
To give effect to the constitutional right of access to any information held by the State and any information that is held by another person and that is required for the exercise or protection of any rights; and to provide for matters connected therewith.
Minimum Information Security Act
(1) Maximises the degree to which unclassified geographic informa-tion from various sources can be made electronically compatible and accessible; and(2) Promotes the development of interoperable geographic information systems technologies that shall -:(a) allow widespread, low-cost use and sharing of geographic data by National, Provincial, local governments and state entities, and the public; and(b) enable the enhancement of services using geographic data
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
8 9
Occupational Health and Safety Act
The Occupational Health and Safety Act aims to provide for the health and safety of persons at work and for the health and safety of persons in connection with the activities of persons at work and to establish an advisory Council for occupational health and safety.
National Treasury Regulations These regulations are issued on a regular basis by National Treasury and are applicable to all public entities as listed on Schedules 2, 3B and 3D. These regulations are also applicable to public entities listed on Schedules 3A and 3C until 31 March 2001
National Archives of South Africa Act 1996
Provides for the proper management and care of the records of gov-ernmental bodies; and the preservation and use of a national archival heritage.
Construction Charter Provides a framework for the construction sector to address BBBEE, enhance capacity and increase productivity in the sector to meet world best practice
Property Charter Promote the BBBEE Act as these relate to the property sectorProtection of Personal Informa-tion
Ensures that all South African institutions conduct themselves in a responsible manner when collecting, processing, storing and sharing another entity’s personal information by holding them accountable should they abuse or compromise personal information in anyway.
CHE Provides for the establishment of a Council that regulates the develop-ment and implementation of quality assurance of higher education.
Table 1: Legislative Mandates
1.3. Policy mandatesThe Council has recently approved the delegation of authority policy to guide the management of ECSA re-sources and it covers the following areas:
• Non-financial delegations • Governance• Strategic planning and reporting• Corporate Services• Statutory Services
• Finance Activities • Accounting Activities/Transactions • Budgeting Activities/Transactions • Treasury Activities/Transactions
1.4 Relevant Court rulings
No court rulings since the proclamation of the EPA in 2000 had a bearing on ECSA operations.
2 Macro Situational Analysis
The 2014 Medium Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS)in the first instance sets the broad macro-eco-nomic environment of the country which will have an impact on the configuration of the Built Environment, and set the policy priorities of government through trade-offs that will be enforced by the macro-economic environment.
The 2014 MTBPS identifies the policy priorities of government. It states that Government’s 2014-19 Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) provides a roadmap to address these challenges. It is the first five-year
policy framework designed in sync with the 2030 vision of the National Development Plan. The 2014-19 MTSF aims to improve policy coherence, alignment and coordination across government. It highlights the need for partnerships between a capable developmental state, a thriving business sector and a strong civil society. It identifies employment, education and enhancing the capacity of the state as core policy objectives. The following are the outcomes targeted in the 2014-2019 MSTF:
1. Quality basic education2. A long and healthy life for all South Africans3. All people in South Africa are and feel safe 4. Decent employment through inclusive growth 5. A skilled and capable workforce to support an inclusive growth plan6. An efficient, competitive and responsive economic infrastructure network 7. Vibrant, equitable, sustainable rural communities contributing to food security for all 8. Sustainable human settlement and improved quality of household life9. Responsive , accountable, effective and efficient local Government10. Protect and enhance our environmental assets and natural resources11. Create a better South Africa and contribute to a better Africa and better world12. An efficient, effective and development-oriented public service 13. A comprehensive, responsive and sustainable social protection system14. A diverse, socially cohesive society with a common national identity
The Department of Public Works (DPW) as the Executive Authority of the ECSA contributes directly to out-comes 4, 6, 7 and 12; and indirectly to outcomes 1, 5, 8, 10 and 14 as identified in Honourable Minister Nxe-si’s - Five Year Policy Statement and Vision for the period 2014-2019. These have an impact on the strategic programmes and projects of the ECSA and the CBE,
The Council for the Built Environment (CBE) is the overarching body that coordinates the activities of the Built Environment Professional Councils. The CBE is of the view that the period between 2015 and 2020 is the time to consolidate and position the Built Environment Professions (BEPs) as important contributors to the development priorities of the State in support of the 14 outcomes of government, and those outcomes to which DPW has a direct and indirect contribution.
The CBE have identified the following core policy objectives in order to provide key areas that will anchor its effort and activities. The MTSF priorities over the period ahead as identified in the MTBPS, which are amena-ble, to the CBE mandate, include the following
• Building the capacity of the public sector, particularly at local government level, through the “back-to-ba-sics” approach, focused on improving service delivery, accountability and financial management.
• Improving the quality of the education system, starting with greater attention to human resources manage-ment and annual assessment of learners to benchmark progress.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
10 11
CBE, following the policy priorities stated above set the following key priorities objectives in the medium-term as follows:
• Ensuring that Built Environment (BE) academic programmes curricula addresses issues of Labour Inten-sive Construction, implementation of the Infrastructure Delivery Management System (IDMS), Sustainable Development and Health and Safety.
• Promotion of high demand skills for Strategic Infrastructure Projects (SIPs).• Stepping up mechanisms, programmes, projects and interventions to drive transformation and ensur-
ing adequate representation of women and black people within the BE through the CBE Transformation Model;
• Scaling up the Maths and Science support programme to reach learners in grade 1 to 12 in 2018;• Establishing a structured candidacy programme for candidates and interns to address bottlenecks in the
skills pipeline; • Supporting workplace training of BE graduates/candidates and interns to deepen competencies and to
promote professional registration;• Strengthening the technical capacity of local, provincial and national government;• Aligning the policy planning and reporting processes of Built Environment Professional Councils (BEPCs)
to the government’s planning cycles and the government’s priorities; • Strengthening monitoring and regulatory work on delegated public functions of the BEPCs; and • Enhancing internal systems, controls and capabilities to allow the organisation to deliver on its mandate
and strategic goals.
2.1 Performance Environment
ECSA has aligned its strategy to the Department of Public Works as the accounting authority and the Council for the Built environment as the body charged with oversight role over the six built Environment Professional Councils. ECSA is of the view that the strategic objectives identified will impact positively on the socio-economic growth and development of South Africa. The following are the strategic goals and strategic objectives of the ECSA within its context and in alignment with the national priorities:
• Recognising engineering practitioners through excellent, relevant and globally accepted educational standards;
• Registering engineering practitioners through accessible, fair, transparent , efficient and credible systems;• Growth and retention of registered engineering practitioners;• Achieve growth of the engineering profession by increasing the number of engineering practitioners to
meet the existing and future demands;• Engineering practitioners successfully renew their registration through fair, credible, transparent and
accessible processes;• Promote public awareness of the profession and its standards through public education, information and
awareness programmes;• Protection of the health, safety and interests of the public through effective regulation of the profession;• Regulate the profession in accordance with the legislative requirements;• Undertake Research to into strategic contributions the profession could make to support national
programmes including and not limited to NDP, NIP and the national beneficiation strategy;• Be responsive to decision makers through excellent stakeholder relationships;• Development of funding proposals for implementation of specific projects from Government and other
stakeholders; and • Manage a sustainable, transformed and coherent organisation that is capable of delivering the impact
desired by its stakeholders and society.
2.2 Organisational Environment
The engineering Council has been in existence since 1968 and have had the founding statutes repealed twice in 1999 and 2000. Since its establishment, this is the first time that the ECSA develop its strategy in line with the Government priorities. A business strategy and business plan was developed for the first time in 2010 since its existence. Since 2010 the Council has put in place monitoring and evaluation tools for con-tinues improvement. During March 2015 CBE impressed on ECSA that an annual performance plan should be developed in the recommended format of the National Treasury.
The strategy developed considered both the internal and external factors and mainly shaped by the transfor-mational factors in an endeavour to correct the overt disparities in the registration regime. Council recognis-es that the new strategic direction is a major milestone in the history of the council. Effective implementation and monitoring of the operation plan in realising the strategic objectives is imperative. Resources are needed to realise the strategy.
A new organogram was developed to support the new strategy. A high level organogram to support the strat-egy is as depicted below in figure 1.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
12 13
Figu
re 1
: Org
anog
ram
Blue
-
P
ositi
on �
lled
on c
urre
nt s
truc
ture
Gre
en
–
N
ew p
ositi
on n
ot o
n cu
rren
t str
uctu
re
Ora
nge
–
Po
sitio
n on
str
uctu
re b
ut v
acan
t
Red
–
re
crui
tmen
t pro
cess
und
erw
ay
Yello
w
–
po
sitio
n to
be
upgr
aded
Purp
le
–
Re
port
ing
line
chan
ged
,
pos
ition
�lle
d on
cur
rent
str
uctu
reEx
plan
atio
n to
blo
ck 5
2 - (
3 +
1 )
3 po
sitio
ns �
lled
and
1 no
t on
curr
ent s
truc
ture
Expl
anat
ion
to b
lock
61
- ( 1
+ 1
) 1
posi
tion
�lle
d an
d 1
not o
n cu
rren
t str
uctu
re
Expl
anat
ion
to b
lock
62
- ( 2
+ 1
) 2
posi
tions
�lle
d an
d 1
not o
n cu
reen
t str
uctu
re
LEG
END
* * *
Coun
cil
CEO
Exec
utive
Po
licy
Deve
lopm
ent A
nd S
tand
ards
G
ener
ation
Exec
utive
Offi
ce O
f The
CEO
Man
ager
Lega
l
Exec
utive
Stra
tegi
c Se
rvic
esEx
ecuti
veRe
gula
tory
Fun
ction
Exec
utive
Corp
orat
e Se
rvic
es
Exec
utive
PA
Man
ager
Info
rmati
on &
Bu
sine
ss P
roce
ss
Exec
utive
PA
Man
ager
Fina
nce
Assi
stan
tM
anag
erAn
alys
tPr
ogra
mm
mer
ITSp
ecia
list
WEB
+ IT
Eng
inee
r
Man
ager
Supp
lyCh
ain
Supp
lyCh
ain
Offi
cer
Man
ager
Acco
unta
ntFi
nanc
ial
Acco
unta
nt
Seni
or D
ebto
rAd
min
istr
ator
2 X
Cred
itors
2 +
1D
ebto
rsCl
erk
Cash
Boo
k Cl
erk
Logi
stics
Offi
cer
Tran
spor
tOffi
cer
Printin
gCl
erk
3 X
Gen
eral
Assi
stan
t
Offi
ce M
anag
erEx
ecuti
ve P
A
Man
ager
Re
gist
ratio
ns
Assi
stan
t Man
ager
Regi
stratio
ns
10 R
egis
trati
on
Offi
cers
Man
ager
Educ
ation
Assi
stan
t Man
ager
Educ
ation
Assi
stan
t Man
ager
CPD
3 +
1Ed
ucati
onOffi
cers
5 X
CPD
Offi
cers
Offi
ce M
anag
erEx
ecuti
ve P
A
Man
ager
Sta
keho
lder
Re
latio
ns A
nd M
arketin
gM
anag
erSt
rate
gy
Publ
ic
Relatio
ns
Offi
cer
Mar
ketin
gAs
sist
ant
Assi
stan
tM
anag
erSt
rate
gic
Proj
ect
Assi
stan
tM
anag
erSt
rate
gyD
evel
opm
ent
Rese
arch
er
Exec
utive
PA
Man
ager
Educ
ation
And
Regi
stratio
n
Assis
tant
Man
ager
Educ
ation
Assis
tant
Man
ager
Regi
stra
rion
Man
ager
HR IR
Spec
ialis
t
Payr
oll
Syst
emSp
ecia
list
HR
Offi
cer
Coun
cil
Secr
etar
iat
Reco
rds
Cont
rol
Proc
ess
Qua
lity
Assi
stan
tM
anag
erCa
ll Ce
ntre
6 X
Call
Cent
reOffi
cers
Adm
inCl
erk
Adm
inis
trat
or
Assi
stan
t M
anag
er L
egal
Assi
stan
tM
anag
erLe
gal
2 X
Lega
lAd
min
istr
ator
s
1 +
1Le
gal
Adm
inis
trat
ors
Exec
utive
PA
Educ
ation
Offi
ceRe
gist
ratio
nsOffi
cer
1 2
3
45
67
8
910
1112
13
1719
14
2516
1820
21
2223
24
2627
2829
3031
3233
3435
3637
3839
4041
4243
4445
4647
4849
5051
5253
5657
5859
6061
6263
64
6566
6768
15
5554
2.3 Description of the strategic planning process The ECSA’s strategy came about as a result of an intense consultation process that began in August 2013 and the first draft of the strategic plan was approved on the 27 March 2014 and the final reviewed strategy was approved by Council on the 19 March 2015 which forms the basis for the Annual Performance Plan (APP). The process was divided into two phases.
Phase one – preparation and information gathering
1. Desktop review and research was conducted on secondary data to gain a better understanding of the industry, including competitors and the market.
2. Interviews were held with key people within ECSA leadership, DPW, CBE, various formations of the Built Environment, consumers of the engineering services and service providers.
The primary purpose of this phase was twofold:
A. To gain a better understanding of the organisation, industry and markets. This embraced:
• A reflection on the organisation itself including the understanding of its core competencies; and• An understanding of the stakeholders at ECSA and their perspectives on strategic direction
B. Generating ideas through dialogue with key stakeholders. The ideas were analysed and informed the formulation of an agenda for phase 2 of the process being facilitation of the strategic session with the Council.
The following are the common themes advanced by the participants of phase 1 as possible strategic direction of which Council echoed the same sentiments in its deliberations:
• Maintain and strengthen focus on accreditation and registration of engineering professionals;• Expand within the mandate an outward focus to support national priorities;• Position ECSA for growth opportunities in the continent;• Strengthen ECSA’s approach to education in the engineering sector to develop much needed skills and
relevance;• Develop an approach to transformation that embrace impact and competence without neglecting • demographics; and • Broaden funding base beyond application and annual fees to project funding from Government and else-
where.
Phase two – Facilitation phase A strategic review session was held on the 21 November 2013. The CBE CEO also attended and made contributions in order to ensure strategy alignment between DPW, CBE and ECSA.
The process for both phase one and two culminated in the formation of the Strategic Plan, the context is that there was increased pressure from stakeholders for the Built Environment organisations to cooperate with one another but also demonstrate their ability to transform as well as show relevance to the South African context and beyond. The foregoing is required in addition to the imperative to continue to find more effective, transparent, credible and accessible ways of fulfilling its traditional mandate with regard to registration and accrediting professionals.
An environmental scan was conducted using SWOT and PESTEL analysis. The following is the outcome of the analysis:
SWOT analysis produced the results as set out below:
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
14 15
STR
ENG
THS
WEA
KN
ESSE
S•
Wel
l est
ablis
hed
and
trust
ed b
rand
in th
e En
gine
erin
g Pr
ofes
sion
–
has
influ
ence
• La
rge
mem
bers
hip
• C
ompe
tent
and
loya
l per
sons
who
kno
w w
hat t
hey
are
doin
g –
espe
cial
ly v
olun
teer
s•
Cre
dibl
e an
d re
liabl
e in
form
atio
n (d
atab
ase
of e
ngin
eerin
g pr
acti-
tione
rs, e
duca
tion
and
regi
stra
tion
stan
dard
s, e
tc)
• C
onse
rvat
ive
in th
e m
aint
enan
ce o
f hig
h st
anda
rds
• So
me
cred
ibilit
y w
ith p
oliti
cal l
eade
rshi
p•
Link
s to
Vol
unta
ry A
ssoc
iatio
ns•
Res
pect
ed in
indu
stry
as
a re
gula
tory
bod
y
• La
ck o
f sha
red
visi
on•
Res
ista
nce
to tr
ansf
orm
atio
n am
ongs
t som
e•
Inw
ardl
y fo
cuse
d on
regu
latio
n•
His
toric
ally
poo
r im
age
• Se
en a
s an
unt
rans
form
ed o
ld b
oys
club
• Th
is p
erce
ptio
n do
es n
ot r
eflec
t cu
rrent
rea
litie
s bu
t lin
gers
and
ne
eds
to b
e co
rrect
ed•
Lim
ited
staff
eng
inee
ring
capa
bilit
y•
Ove
r rel
ianc
e on
retir
ed v
olun
teer
s•
No
succ
essi
on p
lan
for v
olun
teer
s•
Lack
of i
nvol
vem
ent o
f you
nger
, par
ticul
arly
bla
ck e
ngin
eers
and
fe-
mal
es•
Lack
of r
esea
rch
capa
bilit
y•
Low
mor
ale
amon
gst s
taff
• St
aff d
on’t
own
the
stra
tegy
and
und
erst
and
how
they
mus
t con
tribu
te•
Cou
ncil
chan
ges
too
ofte
n –
lack
of c
ontin
uity
• N
ot e
noug
h be
nefit
s fo
r reg
iste
red
engi
neer
ing
prac
titio
ners
.•
No
qual
ity m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
acr
oss
the
orga
nisa
tion
• In
adeq
uate
legi
slat
ive
fram
ewor
k•
Inad
equa
te re
gist
ratio
n sy
stem
• In
adeq
uate
ICT
envi
ronm
ent
• La
ck o
f tra
nsve
rsal
sys
tem
to a
ccom
mod
ate
regi
stra
tion
of s
peci
fied
cate
gorie
s•
Poss
ible
mis
alig
nmen
t of s
truct
ure
to s
trate
gy•
Inad
equa
te fu
ndin
g
• St
reng
then
exi
stin
g Pr
ogra
mm
es
Syst
ems
Br
oade
n ed
ucat
iona
l infl
uenc
e an
d sc
ope
Ex
pand
mem
bers
hip
A
dd v
alue
to m
embe
rs
Em
brac
e yo
unge
r eng
inee
rs•
Dev
elop
stra
tegi
es to
resp
ond
to g
over
nmen
t and
SO
E pr
iorit
ies
N
DP,
PIC
C
Lo
cal G
over
nmen
t
Esko
m, T
rans
net.s
Bu
ilt E
nviro
nmen
t
Skills
dev
elop
men
t•
Rep
ositi
on th
e br
and
• A
stro
ng e
ngin
eerin
g pr
ofes
sion
ser
ving
the
natio
n an
d be
yond
• St
reng
then
EC
SA O
rgan
isat
iona
lly a
nd it
s St
aff•
Tran
sfor
mat
ion
Te
chni
cal c
apab
ility
Su
cces
sion
pla
nnin
g
Expa
nd m
embe
rshi
p
Dev
elop
a n
atio
nal f
ootp
rint
Im
prov
e st
aff m
oral
e
Inte
rnat
iona
l par
ticip
atio
n
• C
hang
ing
soci
al, p
oliti
cal a
nd e
cono
mic
env
ironm
ent
• Po
litic
al “i
nter
vent
ion”
if w
e ar
e no
t see
n to
be
doin
g ou
r job
• EC
SA d
oesn
’t re
mai
n re
leva
nt to
new
tech
nolo
gies
• U
nwilli
ngne
ss to
cha
nge
• Yo
ung
engi
neer
s re
ject
ing
ECSA
PEST
EL A
naly
sis
CR
ITER
IA/ F
AC
TOR
SIN
TER
NA
L FA
CTO
RS
EXTE
RN
AL
FAC
TOR
SIN
TERV
ENTI
ON
SPo
litic
alVo
lunt
eers
v/s
sus
tain
able
sta
ff ca
paci
tyG
row
ing
impa
tienc
e w
ith la
ck o
f tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
i. D
emon
stra
te a
ctiv
e tr
ansf
orm
a-tio
n of
the
prof
essio
nii.
Add
ress
cap
acity
, sys
tem
and
pr
oces
s iss
ues t
o ad
dres
s and
im
prov
e th
e “v
olun
teer
s” sy
stem
Econ
omic
Inad
equa
te fu
ndin
gIn
adeq
uate
fund
ing
i. I
nves
tigat
e an
d im
plem
ent a
th
ird
s
tream
inco
me
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
16 18
OPP
ORT
UN
ITIE
STH
REA
TS
Soci
alPo
sitio
ning
EC
SA m
anda
te to
be
resp
onsi
ve to
loca
l and
nat
iona
l so
cio-
econ
omic
requ
irem
ents
Gro
win
g pr
essu
re to
mee
t soc
ial
infra
stru
ctur
e de
velo
pmen
t de-
man
ds
i. P
ositi
on p
rofe
ssio
n fo
r effe
ctiv
e
d
eliv
ery
of s
ocia
l inf
rast
ruct
ure
Tech
nolo
gica
lO
ut d
ated
tech
nolo
gy u
nabl
e to
su
ppor
t int
erna
l bus
ines
s pr
oces
s-es
Tech
nolo
gica
l set
up
not g
eare
d to
war
ds e
lect
roni
c in
tera
ctio
n w
ith
exte
rnal
app
lican
ts i.
e. E
lect
roni
c ap
plic
atio
ns
i. D
esig
n ne
w a
nd a
ppro
pria
te
tech
n
olog
y to
sup
port
ECSA
bus
i-ne
ssEn
viro
nmen
tQ
uest
to in
tegr
ate
envi
ronm
en-
tal c
once
rns
in th
e en
gine
erin
g so
lutio
ns
Pres
sure
to in
tegr
ate
envi
ronm
en-
tal c
onsi
dera
tions
in th
e gi
ven
engi
neer
ing
solu
tions
i. D
eter
min
e ap
prop
riate
env
ironm
enta
l sen
sitiv
ities
to b
e
in
tegr
ated
with
eng
inee
ring
s
olut
ions
Le
gal
Inad
equa
te le
gal &
pol
icy
fram
e-w
ork
Inab
ility
to p
rogr
ess
regi
stra
tion
of s
peci
fied
cate
gorie
s in
line
with
S1
8(3)
of t
he A
ct
Cum
bers
ome
and
ineffi
cien
t reg
is-
tratio
n pr
oces
ses/
syst
em
Lack
of a
com
puls
ory
mec
hani
sm
to e
nsur
e pr
otec
tion
of th
e w
ord
“Eng
inee
r” an
d co
mpu
lsor
y re
gis-
tratio
n of
all
Engi
neer
s pe
rform
ing
engi
neer
ing
wor
k of
wha
teve
r typ
e
Inad
equa
te le
gal a
nd p
olic
y fra
mew
ork
i. R
evie
w a
nd a
men
d le
gisl
atio
n to
alig
n it
to b
est r
egul
ator
y
pra
ctic
esii.
Cre
ate
a fra
mew
ork
to re
gist
er
s
peci
fied
cate
gorie
s of
Eng
i-ne
ers
out
side
of t
he P
rofe
ssio
nal E
ngi
n
eer c
ateg
ory
or c
urre
ntly
reco
gniz
ed c
ateg
orie
siii.
Est
ablis
h a
track
ed s
yste
m o
f
reg
istra
tion
from
enr
olm
ent o
f
stu
dent
s to
pro
fess
iona
l
Eng
inee
r with
qui
cker
turn
-aro
und
times
iv. E
ngag
e in
dust
ry w
ith a
vie
w to
pro
curin
g th
eir s
uppo
rt to
onl
y
h
ire E
ngin
eers
who
are
regi
ster
ed w
ith E
CSA
3 St
rate
gic
outc
ome-
orie
nted
goa
ls o
f the
ECS
A
The
follo
win
g fo
ur S
trate
gic
Out
com
e O
rient
ated
Goa
ls w
ere
iden
tified
as
the
stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
of E
CSA
: St
rate
gic
Goa
l 1En
gine
erin
g pr
actit
ione
rs e
njoy
the
bene
fit o
f wor
ld c
lass
edu
catio
n an
d re
gist
ratio
n G
oal s
tate
men
tAn
effi
cien
t, in
clus
ive,
tran
spar
ent r
egis
tratio
n an
d ed
ucat
ion
prac
tices
that
pro
mot
es d
eman
d, e
mpl
oyab
ility,
mar
keta
bili-
ty, m
obilit
y an
d pr
otec
tion
of w
ork
envi
ronm
ent
Link
to n
atio
nal
outc
ome(
s)•
Dire
ctly
- C
BE s
trate
gic
goal
2 –
a tr
ansf
orm
ed b
uilt
envi
ronm
ent w
ith a
ppro
pria
te, a
dequ
ate
skills
and
com
pete
ncie
s,
resp
onsi
ve to
the
coun
try’s
infra
stru
ctur
e de
liver
y, o
pera
tion
and
mai
nten
ance
nee
ds
• D
irect
ly -
MTS
F ou
tcom
e 5
– A
skille
d an
d ca
pabl
e w
orkf
orce
to s
uppo
rt an
incl
usiv
e gr
owth
pla
n.
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
9 –
Res
pons
ive,
acc
ount
able
, effe
ctiv
e an
d effi
cien
t loc
al G
over
nmen
t.
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
11
– C
reat
e a
bette
r Sou
th A
frica
and
con
tribu
te to
a b
ette
r Afri
ca a
nd a
bet
ter w
orld
. •
Dire
ctly
with
sec
tion
3 ( C
) of
the
Cou
ncil
for t
he B
uilt
Envi
ronm
ent
Act,2
000
(Act
43
of 2
000)
• D
irect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 1
2 –
An e
ffici
ent,
effec
tive
and
deve
lopm
ent o
rient
ed p
ublic
ser
vice
.
Stra
tegi
c G
oal 2
Publ
ic a
war
enes
s of
the
Prof
essi
on a
nd it
s st
anda
rds
and
regu
latio
n to
ens
ure
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
thos
e st
anda
rds
in
the
publ
ic in
tere
stG
oal s
tate
men
tAn
info
rmed
pub
lic th
at c
an h
old
the
Prof
essi
on a
ccou
ntab
le to
the
regu
lato
ry s
tand
ards
Link
to n
atio
nal
outc
ome(
s)•
Dire
ctly
- M
TSF
outc
ome
5 –
A sk
illed
and
capa
ble
wor
kfor
ce to
sup
port
an in
clus
ive
grow
th p
lan.
• C
BE S
trate
gic
goal
4 –
Bui
lt En
viro
nmen
t Pro
fess
iona
ls (B
EPs)
that
ope
rate
with
in a
regu
late
d po
licy
and
legi
slat
ive
fram
ewor
k•
Indi
rect
ly -
MTS
F ou
tcom
e 3
– Al
l peo
ple
in S
outh
Afri
ca a
re a
nd fe
el s
afe.
• In
dire
ctly
- M
TSF
outc
ome
11 –
Cre
ate
a be
tter S
outh
Afri
ca a
nd c
ontri
bute
to a
bet
ter A
frica
and
bet
ter w
orld
. •
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 9
– R
espo
nsiv
e, a
ccou
ntab
le, e
ffect
ive
and
effici
ent l
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
10
– Pr
otec
t and
enh
ance
our
env
ironm
enta
l ass
ets
and
natu
ral r
esou
rces
Stra
tegi
c G
oal 3
Engi
neer
ing
prac
titio
ners
pro
activ
ely
resp
onsi
ve to
loca
l and
nat
iona
l soc
io-e
cono
mic
requ
irem
ents
Goa
l sta
tem
ent
Hig
h im
pact
soc
io-e
cono
mic
inte
rven
tions
in re
spon
se to
nat
iona
l and
oth
er p
riorit
ies
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
18 19
Link
to n
atio
nal
outc
ome(
s)•
CBE
Stra
tegi
c go
al 1
– a
Bui
lt En
viro
nmen
t tha
t is
resp
onsi
ve to
the
deve
lopm
enta
l and
eco
nom
ic p
riorit
ies
of g
over
n-m
ent
•
CBE
Stra
tegi
c go
al 3
– a
n op
timal
ly fu
nctio
ning
bui
lt en
viro
nmen
t with
a re
spon
sive
and
rele
vant
pol
icy
and
legi
slat
ive
fram
ewor
k ba
sed
on in
form
ed a
nd re
sear
ched
pos
ition
s.•
CBE
Stra
tegi
c go
al 2
– a
tran
sfor
med
bui
lt en
viro
nmen
t with
app
ropr
iate
, ade
quat
e sk
ills a
nd c
ompe
tenc
ies,
resp
on-
sive
to th
e co
untry
’s in
frast
ruct
ure
deliv
ery,
ope
ratio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce n
eeds
.•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 2
– A
long
and
hea
lthy
life
for a
ll So
uth
Afric
ans.
•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 3
– A
ll pe
ople
are
in S
outh
Afri
ca a
re a
nd fe
el s
afe.
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
9 –
Res
pons
ive,
acc
ount
able
, effe
ctiv
e an
d effi
cien
t loc
al G
over
nmen
t•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 1
1 –
Cre
ate
a be
tter S
outh
Afri
ca a
nd c
ontri
bute
to a
bet
ter A
frica
and
a b
ette
r wor
ld.
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
12
– An
effi
cien
t, eff
ectiv
e an
d de
velo
pmen
t-orie
nted
pub
lic s
ervi
ce.
Stra
tegi
c G
oal 4
A su
stai
nabl
e, tr
ansf
orm
ed a
nd c
oher
ent o
rgan
isat
ion
that
is c
apab
le o
f del
iver
ing
the
impa
ct d
esire
d by
its
stak
ehol
ders
an
d so
ciet
y w
ithin
the
prov
isio
ns o
f the
EPA
Goa
l sta
tem
ent
A co
here
nt a
nd w
ell r
un o
rgan
isat
ion
Link
to n
atio
nal
outc
ome(
s)In
dire
ctly
- C
BE S
trate
gic
goal
4 –
Bui
lt En
viro
nmen
t Pro
fess
iona
ls (B
EPs)
that
ope
rate
with
in a
regu
late
d po
licy
and
leg-
isla
tive
fram
ewor
k
PART B: STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES4 Aligning ECSA objectives to the mandate
ECSA was established under the Engineering Professions Act No 46 of 2000. This Act, inter alia empowers ECSA to perform a variety of functions as outlined below:
1. Setting and auditing of academic standards for purposes of registration through a process of accredita-tion of engineering programmes at Tertiary Education Institutions.
2. Setting and auditing of professional development standards through the provision of guidelines which set out the ECSA’s post-qualification requirements for registration in the four professional categories of registration; namely Professional Engineer, Professional Engineering Technologist, Professional Certif-icated Engineer and Professional Engineering Technician as well as for Specified Categories, such as Registered Lift inspectors.
3. Prescribing and enforcing requirements for Continuing Professional Development and determining the period within which registered persons must apply for renewal of their registrations.
4. Prescribing a Code of Conduct and Codes of Practice, and enforcing such conduct through appropriate Investigating Committees and a Disciplinary Tribunal.
5. Identification of work of an engineering nature that should be reserved for registered persons by the Council for the Built Environment (CBE), after consultation with the Competition Board.
6. Advising the Council for the Built Environment (CBE) and Minister of Public Works on matters relating to the engineering profession and cognate matters.
7. Recognition of professional associations, such as engineering associations, institutes, institutions and societies.
8. Publication of a guideline tariff of fees for consulting work, in consultation with government, the profes-sion and industry.
9. Doing such other things as may be necessary for the proper performance of its functions in terms of the Act.
ECSA understands its mandate and the value chain as exhibited in the diagram 2 below:
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
20 21
Over its history ECSA has sought to execute its mandate effectively. However recent years have seen ris-ing pressure from government and other stakeholders for ECSA to give greater definition to the mandate implicit in points 7 and 9 above. In this respect ECSA needs to answer the strategic question of how it can add value to the political and economic imperatives facing South Africa. This is especially critical in the light of the significant infrastructure development plans indicated by the current regime as evident in the National Development Plan (NDP), Presidential Infrastructure coordinating commission (PICC), and the Strategic In-tegrated Projects (SIPS) as well as state owned enterprises such as Transnet and Eskom. Further to that, Council resolved to Assist (within the ambit of the EPA) cross border academic institutions to set-up accred-itations systems and accredit engineering programmes upon request as a strategic imperative in support of aspirations 1 and 7 as espoused in Africa Agenda 2063 that reads “a prosperous Africa based on inclusive growth and sustainable development” and “Africa as a strong, united and influential global player and partner” respectively.
5 PROGRAMMES5.1 Programme 1: Education and Registration Strategic Goal 1: Engineering practitioners enjoy the benefit of world class education and registration.
Strategic objectives: An efficient, inclusive, transparent registration and education practices that promotes demand, employability, marketability, mobility and protection of work environment.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
22 23
Polic
y,St
anda
rds
and
Proc
edur
esD
evel
opm
ent
Reg
istr
atio
n,A
ccre
dita
tion
& q
ualit
yas
sura
nce
Con
tinui
ngPr
ofes
sion
alD
evel
opm
ent
(CPD
)
Prof
essi
onal
Con
duct
Man
agem
ent
Figu
re 2
: und
erst
andi
ng o
f EC
SA’s
cor
e m
anda
te
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 1.
1En
gine
erin
g pr
actit
ione
rs a
re re
cogn
ised
thro
ugh
exce
llent
, rel
evan
t and
glo
bally
acc
epte
d ed
ucat
ion
stan
dard
s
Obj
ectiv
e st
atem
ent
• Ac
cred
itatio
n of
eng
inee
ring
prog
ram
mes
in h
ighe
r edu
catio
n in
stitu
tions
in S
outh
Afri
ca
• C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts fo
r the
inte
rnat
iona
l acc
ords
and
agr
eem
ents
with
the
glob
al e
ngin
eerin
g or
gani
satio
ns
• En
gage
men
t of t
he e
mpl
oyer
bod
ies
to c
reat
e a
cond
uciv
e w
ork
envi
ronm
ent f
or e
ngin
eerin
g pr
actit
ione
rs
Bas
elin
e1.
Acc
redi
tatio
n of
Eng
inee
ring
prog
ram
mes
As o
f 31
Mar
ch 2
015,
222
eng
inee
ring
prog
ram
mes
wer
e ac
cred
ited
by E
CSA
in 1
7 in
stitu
tions
bei
ng U
nive
rsity
of C
ape
Tow
n, U
nive
rsity
of K
waz
ulu-
Nat
al, N
elso
n M
ande
la M
etro
polit
an U
nive
rsity
, Nor
th-W
est U
nive
rsity
, Uni
vers
ity o
f Pre
toria
, U
nive
rsity
of J
ohan
nesb
urg,
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ste
llenb
osch
, the
Uni
vers
ity o
f Witw
ater
sran
d, V
aal U
nive
rsity
of T
echn
olog
y, T
sh-
wan
e U
nive
rsity
of T
echn
olog
y, U
NIS
A, U
nive
rsity
of J
ohan
nesb
urg,
Cen
tral U
nive
rsity
of T
echn
olog
y (F
ree
Stat
e), M
ango
-so
tho
Uni
vers
ity o
f Tec
hnol
ogy,
Dur
ban
Uni
vers
ity o
f Tec
hnol
ogy,
Cap
e Pe
nins
ula
Uni
vers
ity o
f Tec
hnol
ogy
and
Wal
ter S
isul
u U
nive
rsity
. Th
e en
gine
erin
g pr
ogra
mm
es a
re a
ccre
dite
d as
follo
ws:
• 50
Bac
helo
r of S
cien
ce in
Eng
inee
ring
• 93
Bac
helo
r of T
echn
olog
y in
Eng
inee
ring
• 79
Nat
iona
l Dip
lom
a in
Eng
inee
ring
ECSA
is a
war
e of
one
inst
itutio
n th
at is
cur
rent
ly o
fferin
g en
gine
erin
g pr
ogra
mm
e th
at is
not
acc
redi
ted.
The
re c
ould
be
mor
e ot
her i
nstit
utio
ns th
at a
re o
fferin
g en
gine
erin
g pr
ogra
mm
es th
at a
re n
ot k
now
n to
EC
SA.
2. G
loba
lly a
ccep
ted
educ
atio
n st
anda
rds
ECSA
is a
mem
ber o
f the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Eng
inee
ring
Allia
nce
(IEA)
that
pro
mot
es th
e m
obilit
y of
the
engi
neer
ing
prof
essi
on v
ia
the
educ
atio
nal a
ccor
ds a
nd c
ompe
tenc
y ag
reem
ent a
mon
g th
e m
embe
r cou
ntrie
s. A
s of
31
Mar
ch 2
015,
EC
SA is
a s
igna
-to
ry to
thre
e ed
ucat
iona
l Acc
ords
and
two
com
pete
ncy
agre
emen
ts b
eing
:
• W
ashi
ngto
n ac
cord
• Sy
dney
acc
ord
• D
ublin
acc
ord
• In
tern
atio
nal p
rofe
ssio
nal e
ngin
eers
agr
eem
ent(I
PEA)
• In
tern
atio
nal e
ngin
eerin
g Te
chno
logi
st a
gree
men
t (IE
TA)
ECSA
par
ticip
ate
in a
ll ac
tiviti
es o
f the
allia
nce
that
incl
udes
pee
r rev
iew
s of
mem
ber c
ount
ries;
mak
e in
puts
in c
ompe
tenc
y st
anda
rds,
pol
icie
s an
d at
tribu
tes
of th
e en
gine
erin
g pr
actit
ione
rs.
Just
ifica
tion
Legi
slat
ive
inju
nctio
n as
pro
vide
d fo
r in
sect
ion
13 o
f the
Eng
inee
ring
Prof
essi
ons
Act,
2000
(Act
46
of 2
000)
read
toge
ther
w
ith s
ectio
n 5(
c )(
iii) o
f the
Hig
her E
duca
tion
Act,
1997
(Act
101
of 1
997)
Link
s•
Dire
ctly
- M
TSF
outc
ome
5 –
A sk
illed
and
capa
ble
wor
kfor
ce to
sup
port
an in
clus
ive
grow
th p
lan.
•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 1
1 –
crea
te a
bet
ter S
outh
Afri
ca a
nd c
ontri
bute
to a
bet
ter A
frica
and
bet
ter w
orld
. •
Dire
ctly
with
sec
tion
3 ( C
) of
the
Cou
ncil
for t
he B
uilt
Envi
ronm
ent
Act,2
000
(Act
43
of 2
000)
• D
irect
ly -
CBE
stra
tegi
c go
al 2
– a
tran
sfor
med
bui
lt en
viro
nmen
t with
app
ropr
iate
, ade
quat
e sk
ills a
nd c
ompe
tenc
ies,
re
spon
sive
to th
e co
untry
’s in
frast
ruct
ure
deliv
ery,
ope
ratio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce n
eeds
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 1.
2En
gine
erin
g pr
actit
ione
rs a
re re
gist
ered
thro
ugh
acce
ssib
le, f
air,
trans
pare
nt, e
ffici
ent a
nd c
redi
ble
syst
em
Obj
ectiv
e st
atem
ent
Impr
oved
regi
stra
tion
syst
em in
line
with
bes
t pra
ctic
e th
at s
trive
s to
pro
mot
e ac
cess
ibilit
y, fa
irnes
s, tr
ansp
aren
cy, e
ffici
ency
an
d cr
edib
ility
Bas
elin
e•
The
regi
stra
tion
appl
icat
ion
proc
ess
is c
urre
ntly
cen
tralis
ed a
s th
ere
is o
nly
one
natio
nal E
CSA
offi
ce b
ased
in G
aute
ng,
whi
ch p
osse
ss a
cha
lleng
e of
acc
essi
bilit
y fo
r the
pro
spec
tive
appl
ican
ts.
• Th
e re
gist
ratio
n ap
plic
atio
n pr
oces
s is
don
e m
anua
lly a
nd in
som
e ca
ses
affec
ted
by a
num
ber o
f ext
erna
l fac
tors
incl
ud-
ing
the
natio
nal P
ost o
ffice
stri
kes.
•
Ther
e ar
e ov
erw
helm
ing
sent
imen
ts a
mon
gst t
he s
take
hold
ers
that
EC
SA p
roce
sses
are
obs
truct
ive
and
non-
trans
pare
nt.
• Fu
rther
to th
at, t
here
are
stro
ng s
entim
ents
exp
ress
ed th
roug
h cr
itica
l ski
lls s
urve
y co
nduc
ted
in 2
013
that
the
regi
stra
tion
syst
em is
not
tran
spar
ent,
the
regi
stra
tion
is c
umbe
rsom
e, th
ere
is p
oor c
omm
unic
atio
n of
real
tim
e in
form
atio
n fo
r app
li-ca
nts
and
inte
rvie
ws
are
callo
us, t
o m
entio
n a
few.
Just
ifica
tion
Legi
slat
ive
inju
nctio
n as
pro
vide
d fo
r in
sect
ion
11, 1
8 an
d 19
, 21
and
22 o
f the
Eng
inee
ring
Prof
essi
ons
Act,
2000
(Act
46
of
2000
). Th
e id
entifi
ed c
halle
nges
will
be a
ddre
ssed
thro
ugh
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
a p
rogr
amm
e re
ferre
d to
as
a N
ew R
egis
-tra
tion
Syst
em (N
RS)
. NR
S pu
rpor
ts to
ove
rhau
l the
ent
ire re
gist
ratio
n by
(i) r
evie
win
g ed
ucat
ion
and
regi
stra
tion
stan
dard
s,
polic
ies
and
proc
edur
es, (
ii) m
ake
atte
mpt
s to
reac
h ou
t to
the
appl
ican
ts in
thei
r res
pect
ive
prov
ince
s fo
r ass
essm
ent i
nter
-vi
ews,
(iii)
Incr
ease
the
pool
of a
sses
sors
in v
ario
us p
rovi
nces
, (iv
) offe
r gui
danc
e to
app
lican
ts w
hom
thei
r app
licat
ion
for
regi
stra
tion
is d
efer
red
to a
late
r dat
e, a
nd (v
) the
dev
elop
men
t of a
n on
line
regi
stra
tion
syst
em to
mak
e re
gist
ratio
n sy
stem
th
at is
out
com
e ba
sed.
The
ben
efit f
or th
e ap
plic
ants
with
the
onlin
e sy
stem
will
be th
e ab
ility
to tr
ack
appl
icat
ion
prog
ress
on
line.
Link
s•
Dire
ctly
- M
TSF
outc
ome
5 –
A sk
illed
and
capa
ble
wor
kfor
ce to
sup
port
an in
clus
ive
grow
th p
lan.
•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 1
1 –
Cre
ate
a be
tter S
outh
Afri
ca a
nd c
ontri
bute
to a
bet
ter A
frica
and
bet
ter w
orld
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
12
– An
effi
cien
t, eff
ectiv
e an
d de
velo
pmen
t-orie
nted
pub
lic s
ervi
ce
• D
irect
ly -
CBE
stra
tegi
c go
al 2
– A
tran
sfor
med
bui
lt en
viro
nmen
t with
app
ropr
iate
, ade
quat
e sk
ills a
nd c
ompe
tenc
ies,
re
spon
sive
to th
e co
untry
’s in
frast
ruct
ure
deliv
ery,
ope
ratio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce n
eeds
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
24 25
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 1.
3G
row
th a
nd re
tent
ion
of re
gist
ered
Eng
inee
ring
prac
titio
ners
Obj
ectiv
e st
atem
ent
• Th
e pr
omot
ion
of th
e pr
ofes
sion
;•
The
deve
lopm
ent o
f add
ition
al a
ttrac
tive
bene
fits
for r
egis
tere
d pr
actit
ione
rs;
• Th
e st
reng
then
ing
of re
latio
nshi
ps w
ith re
cogn
ised
Vol
unta
ry A
ssoc
iatio
ns
• En
gagi
ng th
e em
ploy
ers
of e
ngin
eerin
g pr
actit
ione
rs to
pro
mot
e th
e be
nefit
of E
CSA
• In
fluen
ce e
mpl
oym
ent p
ract
ices
with
resp
ect t
o en
gine
erin
g pr
actit
ione
rs•
Influ
enci
ng tr
ansf
orm
atio
n ac
ross
the
sect
or;
• Pr
otec
ting
the
Envi
ronm
ent.
B
asel
ine
• C
urre
ntly
ther
e is
a g
ener
al c
onse
nsus
that
app
roxi
mat
ely
38%
of t
he p
ract
isin
g en
gine
ers
are
regi
ster
ed w
ith E
CSA
. •
Prof
essi
onal
regi
stra
tion
rem
ains
non
-com
puls
ory
in te
rms
of th
e EP
A.
• Th
e th
ird te
rm C
ounc
il ta
rget
ed to
regi
ster
50
000
engi
neer
ing
prac
titio
ners
by
end
of 2
014
and
only
44
621
was
ach
ieve
d.
Ther
e ha
s be
en a
ste
ady
grow
th o
f new
regi
stra
tions
bet
wee
n th
e ye
ars
2011
and
201
4 at
an
aver
age
of 6
.3%
how
ever
th
ere
has
been
a n
otab
le in
crea
se o
f per
sons
that
do
not m
aint
ain
thei
r reg
istra
tion
lead
ing
to a
dec
line
in th
e ne
t figu
res
and
rete
ntio
n fa
ilure
.
Volu
ntar
y A
ssoc
iatio
ns -
ECSA
has
reco
gnis
ed 4
4 Vo
lunt
ary
Asso
ciat
ions
in c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith s
ectio
n 25
of t
he E
ngin
eerin
g Pr
ofes
sion
Act
, 200
0(46
of 2
000)
. A p
latfo
rm is
est
ablis
hed
to c
reat
e a
dial
ogue
bet
wee
n EC
SA a
nd th
e Vo
lunt
ary
Asso
cia-
tions
how
ever
; the
re is
a n
eed
to jo
intly
impl
emen
t ind
ustry
initi
ativ
es fo
r max
imum
impa
ct.
Prot
ectin
g th
e en
viro
nmen
t Pr
otec
tion
of th
e en
viro
nmen
t is
embe
dded
in th
e co
de o
f con
duct
, the
ele
ven
exit
leve
l out
com
es a
nd th
e en
gine
erin
g cu
rric-
ulum
.
Just
ifica
tion
Pro
tect
ing
the
Pub
lic a
nd th
e en
viro
nmen
tTh
ere
is a
nee
d, to
a g
reat
er e
xten
d, to
regu
late
eng
inee
ring
prac
titio
ners
that
will
be g
uide
d by
a c
ode
of c
ondu
ct in
ord
er to
pr
otec
t the
mem
bers
of t
he p
ublic
. Eng
inee
ring
solu
tions
are
nec
essa
ry fo
r the
del
iver
y of
infra
stru
ctur
e, g
oods
and
ser
vice
s.
Beca
use
engi
neer
ing
invo
lves
exp
loiti
ng a
nd c
ontro
lling
natu
ral f
orce
s an
d co
mpl
ex s
yste
ms
and
proc
esse
s, th
e at
tain
men
t of
sol
utio
ns is
acc
ompa
nied
by
risks
. Miti
gatio
n of
thes
e ris
ks re
quire
s co
mpe
tent
and
acc
ount
able
eng
inee
ring
prof
essi
onal
s.
The
regi
stra
tion
syst
em h
as b
een
esta
blis
hed
by la
w to
ens
ure
this
com
pete
nce
and
acco
unta
bilit
y.Th
ere
is a
nee
d to
com
e up
with
an
aggr
essi
ve re
tent
ion
stra
tegy
. Li
nks
• D
irect
ly -
MTS
F ou
tcom
e 5
– A
skille
d an
d ca
pabl
e w
orkf
orce
to s
uppo
rt an
incl
usiv
e gr
owth
pla
n.
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
9 –
resp
onsi
ve, a
ccou
ntab
le, e
ffect
ive
and
effici
ent l
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent.
•
Dire
ctly
with
sec
tion
3 ( C
) of
the
Cou
ncil
for t
he B
uilt
Envi
ronm
ent
Act,2
000
(Act
43
of 2
000)
• D
irect
ly -
CBE
stra
tegi
c go
al 2
– A
tran
sfor
med
bui
lt en
viro
nmen
t with
app
ropr
iate
, ade
quat
e sk
ills a
nd c
ompe
tenc
ies,
re
spon
sive
to th
e co
untry
’s in
frast
ruct
ure
deliv
ery,
ope
ratio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce n
eeds
.
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 1.
4Th
e en
gine
erin
g pr
ofes
sion
is g
row
n by
incr
easi
ng th
e nu
mbe
r of e
ngin
eerin
g pr
actit
ione
rs to
mee
t exi
stin
g fu
ture
dem
ands
Obj
ectiv
e st
atem
ent
• Br
oade
ned
scop
e of
regi
ster
ed p
erso
ns u
nder
EC
SA’s
man
date
• O
pera
tiona
lise
the
engi
neer
ing
educ
atio
n tru
st
Bas
elin
eB
road
enin
g sc
ope
of re
gist
ered
per
sons
und
er E
CS
A’s
man
date
Nin
e en
gine
erin
g di
scip
lines
are
cur
rent
ly re
cogn
ised
for r
egis
tratio
n by
EC
SA w
hich
cap
ture
s m
ainl
y th
e 38
% o
f the
per
sons
on
the
data
base
. Th
e m
ajor
ity o
f the
62%
of p
ract
ition
ers
not r
egis
tere
d do
not
nec
essa
rily
form
par
t of t
he re
cogn
ised
dis
-ci
plin
es.
Cou
ncil
wou
ld li
ke to
exp
and
the
scop
e of
the
disc
iplin
es to
incl
ude
emer
ging
mar
kets
suc
h as
rene
wab
le e
nerg
y,
shal
e oi
l and
gas
, etc
. O
pera
tiona
lise
the
engi
neer
ing
educ
atio
n tru
st
In 2
014,
EC
SA re
gist
ered
Sak
him
fund
o Ed
ucat
ion
Trus
t. A
pilo
t pro
ject
bas
ed o
n th
e Th
uthu
ka M
odel
is c
urre
ntly
und
erw
ay
base
d on
a tr
ipar
tite
agre
emen
t bet
wee
n EC
SA, G
aute
ng D
epar
tmen
t of i
nfra
stru
ctur
e D
evel
opm
ent a
nd th
e U
nive
rsity
of
Joha
nnes
burg
. 23
eng
inee
ring
stud
ents
are
ben
efici
arie
s of
the
prog
ram
me
and
are
enro
lled
at th
e U
nive
rsity
of J
ohan
nes-
burg
. Th
e pi
lot p
roje
ct w
as la
unch
ed o
n th
e 06
Oct
ober
201
4.
Just
ifica
tion
Expa
nsio
n of
the
scop
e of
dis
cipl
ines
will
crea
te v
alue
in p
ositi
onin
g EC
SA a
s re
leva
nt a
nd a
ddre
ssin
g th
e ne
eds
on th
e gr
ound
.
Link
s•
Dire
ctly
- M
TSF
outc
ome
5 –
A sk
illed
and
capa
ble
wor
kfor
ce to
sup
port
an in
clus
ive
grow
th p
lan.
•
Dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
12
– An
effi
cien
t, eff
ectiv
e an
d de
velo
pmen
t orie
nted
pub
lic s
ervi
ce.
• D
irect
ly -
CBE
stra
tegi
c go
al 2
– A
tran
sfor
med
bui
lt en
viro
nmen
t with
app
ropr
iate
, ade
quat
e sk
ills a
nd c
ompe
tenc
ies,
re
spon
sive
to th
e co
untry
’s in
frast
ruct
ure
deliv
ery,
ope
ratio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce n
eeds
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 1.
5Pr
actit
ione
rs s
ucce
ssfu
lly re
new
thei
r reg
istra
tion
thro
ugh
fair,
cre
dibl
e, tr
ansp
aren
t and
acc
essi
ble
proc
esse
s
Obj
ectiv
e st
atem
ent
Proa
ctiv
e re
gist
ratio
n re
new
al s
yste
m a
nd p
roce
ss w
orkfl
ows
Bas
elin
eTh
e C
PD s
yste
m p
rese
nts
with
cha
lleng
es to
the
regi
ster
ed p
erso
ns.
The
curre
nt s
yste
m is
slu
ggis
h. R
egis
tere
d pe
rson
s ar
e ve
ry d
isgr
untle
d w
ith th
e sy
stem
. Th
ere
is a
nee
d to
cre
ate
a pl
atfo
rm th
at is
use
r frie
ndly.
Just
ifica
tion
Legi
slat
ive
inju
nctio
n to
rene
w re
gist
ratio
n in
term
s of
sec
tion
22 o
f the
Eng
inee
ring
Prof
essi
on A
ct, 2
000
(Act
46
of 2
000)
Link
s•
Dire
ctly
- C
BE s
trate
gic
goal
2 –
A tr
ansf
orm
ed b
uilt
envi
ronm
ent w
ith a
ppro
pria
te, a
dequ
ate
skills
and
com
pete
ncie
s,
resp
onsi
ve to
th
e co
untry
’s in
frast
ruct
ure
deliv
ery,
ope
ratio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce n
eeds
•
Indi
rect
ly -
MTS
F ou
tcom
e 5
– A
skille
d an
d ca
pabl
e w
orkf
orce
to s
uppo
rt an
incl
usiv
e gr
owth
pla
n.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
26 27
5.1.
1 Re
sour
ce c
onsi
dera
tion
s
This
pro
gram
me
is a
tran
sfor
mat
ion
flags
hip
proj
ect a
s th
e fo
cus
is o
n im
prov
ing
effici
enci
es a
nd m
akin
g re
gist
ratio
n to
be
acce
ssib
le, f
air
and
trans
pare
nt.
Ther
e is
a n
eed
to in
tens
ely
enga
ge th
e aff
ecte
d st
akeh
olde
rs w
hich
was
nev
er d
one
in th
e hi
stor
y of
EC
SA.
The
New
Reg
istra
tions
Sy
stem
is a
n en
ablin
g pl
atfo
rm fo
r the
pro
spec
tive
appl
ican
ts to
acc
ess
regi
stra
tion
onlin
e. I
t is
antic
ipat
ed th
at th
ere
will
be a
ste
ady
budg
et in
-cr
ease
in th
is a
rea.
The
Cou
ncil
will
have
to fi
nd a
ltern
ativ
e w
ays
of fu
ndin
g th
is p
rogr
amm
e if
it w
ill yi
eld
mea
ning
ful r
esul
ts.
Cou
ncil
is o
n ta
lks
with
CBE
to fi
nd w
ays
to fu
nd th
e pr
ogra
mm
e.
5.1.
2 Ri
sk M
anag
emen
t D
escr
iptio
n of
Ris
kPr
imar
y C
ause
sA
ctio
n Pl
ans
Lack
of a
utom
ated
syst
ems f
or st
atut
ory
func
tion
Unr
elia
ble
IT sy
stem
and
cont
rols
for c
aptu
ring
mem
ber’s
dat
a. A
lso p
oor r
ecor
d ke
epin
g pr
actic
es
resu
lting
in th
e lo
ss o
f im
port
ant d
ocum
enta
tion
Cou
ncil
is in
the
proc
ess
to re
view
the
curre
nt
IT in
frast
ruct
ure
with
the
view
to d
evel
op a
n ap
prop
riate
IT in
frast
ruct
ure
that
is in
form
ed
by th
e cu
rrent
stra
tegy
. La
ck o
f effi
cien
t reg
istra
tion
proc
esse
s Lo
ng tu
rnar
ound
tim
es fo
r bot
h re
gist
ratio
n an
d re
fusa
ls ar
e cu
rren
tly e
xper
ienc
ed
Inve
stig
atio
ns a
re c
urre
ntly
und
erw
ay to
im-
prov
e effi
cien
cies
. Th
is in
clud
es u
nder
taki
ng
benc
hmar
king
exe
rcis
es fr
om s
imila
r ins
titu-
tions
at a
nat
iona
l and
inte
rnat
iona
l lev
el. A
n effi
cien
t reg
istra
tion
regi
me
will
be im
plem
ent-
ed o
nce
the
inve
stig
atio
ns a
re d
one
and
on
appr
oval
by
Cou
ncil.
5.2
Prog
ram
me
2: P
ublic
aw
aren
ess
of th
e en
gine
erin
g pr
ofes
sion
St
rate
gic
Goa
l: Pu
blic
aw
aren
ess
of th
e pr
ofes
sion
and
its
stan
dard
s an
d re
gula
tion
to e
nsur
e th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
ose
stan
dard
s in
the
publ
ic
inte
rest
.
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
: An
info
rmed
pub
lic th
at c
an h
old
the
prof
essi
on a
ccou
ntab
le to
the
regu
lato
ry s
tand
ards
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 2.
1Pu
blic
aw
aren
ess
of th
e en
gine
erin
g pr
ofes
sion
and
its
stan
dard
s th
roug
h pu
blic
edu
catio
n, in
form
atio
n an
d aw
aren
ess
pro-
gram
mes
Obj
ectiv
e st
atem
ent
Prom
otin
g th
e pr
ofes
sion
by
diss
emin
atio
n of
info
rmat
ion
rega
rdin
g th
e en
gine
erin
g pr
ofes
sion
to a
var
iety
of s
take
hold
ers
Bas
elin
eM
ost s
take
hold
ers
have
exp
ress
ed th
at E
CSA
is n
ot v
ery
visi
ble
in th
e pu
blic
dom
ain
Just
ifica
tion
ECSA
is a
ver
y st
rate
gic
natio
nal o
rgan
isat
ion
for s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
Link
s•
Indi
rect
ly -
MTS
F ou
tcom
e 3
– Al
l peo
ple
in S
outh
Afri
ca a
re a
nd fe
el s
afe.
• In
dire
ctly
- M
TSF
outc
ome
11 –
Cre
ate
a be
tter S
outh
Afri
ca a
nd c
ontri
bute
to a
bet
ter A
frica
and
bet
ter w
orld
.
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 2.
2Pr
otec
tion
of th
e he
alth
, saf
ety
and
inte
rest
s of
pub
lic th
roug
h eff
ectiv
e re
gula
tion
of th
e pr
ofes
sion
Obj
ectiv
e st
atem
ent
• Eff
ectiv
e an
d effi
cien
t reg
ulat
ion
of th
e pr
ofes
sion
with
focu
s on
con
duct
of r
egis
tere
d pr
ofes
sion
als
thro
ugh
a co
de o
f con
-du
ct p
redi
cate
d on
legi
slat
ion
and
best
pra
ctic
e•
Col
labo
ratio
n w
ith th
e em
ploy
er b
odie
s an
d vo
lunt
ary
asso
ciat
ions
to u
phol
d th
e co
de o
f con
duct
and
cre
ate
a co
nduc
ive
wor
king
env
ironm
ent.
• En
ter i
nto
colla
bora
tion
with
rele
vant
Gov
ernm
ent D
epar
tmen
ts a
nd o
ther
sta
keho
lder
s to
join
tly in
vest
igat
e po
or q
ualit
y en
gine
erin
g w
ork
Bas
elin
eU
phol
ding
the
code
of c
ondu
ctTh
e Le
gal S
ervi
ces
Uni
t cur
rent
ly d
eals
with
Mat
ters
for I
nves
tigat
ion
and
Dis
cipl
inar
y ca
ses.
EC
SA h
as a
cod
e of
con
duct
in
plac
e dr
awn
up in
line
with
the
prov
isio
ns o
f sec
tion
27 o
f the
Eng
inee
ring
Prof
essi
on A
ct 2
000,
(Act
46
of 2
000.
The
turn
-ar
ound
tim
es fo
r fina
lisin
g di
scip
linar
y ca
ses
agai
nst r
espo
nden
ts (r
egis
tere
d pe
rson
s w
ho h
ave
alle
gedl
y tra
nsgr
esse
d th
e co
de o
f con
duct
) hav
e be
en u
nsat
isfa
ctor
y du
e to
cap
acity
cha
lleng
es th
at a
re c
urre
ntly
bei
ng a
ddre
ssed
. Bac
klog
is d
efine
d as
cas
es o
ver a
yea
r.
Cre
atin
g an
ena
blin
g w
orki
ng e
nviro
nmen
tEn
gine
erin
g pr
actit
ione
rs h
ave
an e
xpec
tatio
n th
at E
CSA
sho
uld
assi
st in
cre
atin
g a
cond
uciv
e an
d an
ena
blin
g w
ork
envi
-ro
nmen
t for
com
plia
nce
with
the
code
of c
ondu
ct a
nd g
row
th.
Ju
stifi
catio
nLe
gisl
ativ
e in
junc
tion
in te
rms
of s
ectio
n 27
of t
he E
ngin
eerin
g Pr
ofes
sion
Act
200
0, (A
ct 4
6 of
200
0).
It is
pru
dent
for E
CSA
to
com
e up
with
a p
lan
to d
ispo
se o
f the
bac
klog
. EC
SA s
houl
d be
see
n to
be
aggr
essi
ve in
uph
oldi
ng th
e co
de o
f con
duct
fo
r the
pro
tect
ion
of th
e he
alth
, saf
ety
and
inte
rest
of t
he p
ublic
.
Link
s•
Dire
ctly
- M
TSF
outc
ome
5 –
A sk
illed
and
capa
ble
wor
kfor
ce to
sup
port
an in
clus
ive
grow
th p
lan.
•
CBE
Stra
tegi
c go
al 4
– B
uilt
Envi
ronm
ent P
rofe
ssio
nals
(BEP
s) th
at o
pera
te w
ithin
a re
gula
ted
polic
y an
d le
gisl
ativ
e fra
mew
ork
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
9 –
Res
pons
ive,
acc
ount
able
, effe
ctiv
e an
d effi
cien
t loc
al G
over
nmen
t •
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 1
0 –
Prot
ect a
nd e
nhan
ce o
ur e
nviro
nmen
tal a
sset
s an
d na
tura
l res
ourc
es
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
11
– C
reat
e a
bette
r Sou
th A
frica
and
con
tribu
te to
a b
ette
r Afri
ca a
nd a
bet
ter w
orld
.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
28 29
5.2.
1 R
esou
rce
cons
ider
atio
ns
The
focu
s of
pro
gram
me
2 is
mai
nly
on m
akin
g EC
SA v
isib
le.
Key
stak
ehol
ders
hav
e ex
pres
sed
conc
ern
that
EC
SA is
no
know
n by
the
peop
le th
at
mat
ters
for i
ts e
xist
ence
. It
was
exp
ress
ed a
s w
ell t
hat t
he v
alue
pro
posi
tion
for E
CSA
is n
ot c
lear
. C
urre
ntly
EC
SA h
as e
ngag
ed th
e se
rvic
es o
f a
Publ
ic R
elat
ions
com
pany
. It
is a
ntic
ipat
ed th
at th
ere
will
be a
n in
crea
se in
bud
get f
or th
is p
rogr
amm
e if
ECSA
is to
be
aggr
essi
ve in
the
tact
ics
for
gain
ing
pres
ence
in th
e m
arke
t pla
ce.
5.2.
2 R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Des
crip
tion
of R
isk
Prim
ary
Cau
ses
Act
ion
Plan
sIn
adeq
uate
stak
ehol
der s
uppo
rt a
nd co
oper
atio
n Th
ere i
s no
effec
tive s
take
hold
er en
gage
men
t, i.e
. the
pr
oces
s by
whi
ch an
EC
SA in
volv
es p
eopl
e who
may
be
affec
ted
by th
e dec
ision
s it m
akes
or c
an in
fluen
ce
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
its d
ecisi
ons
Cou
ncil
plan
to
enga
ge d
iffer
ent
stak
ehol
ders
th
roug
h ro
ad s
how
s in
ord
er to
gai
n a
bette
r in-
sigh
t int
o st
akeh
olde
r nee
ds.
Wea
k va
lue
prop
ositi
on
Redu
ced
inco
me
due
to c
ance
llatio
n of
reg
istra
tion
beca
use
of th
e pe
rcei
ved
lack
of m
embe
rshi
p va
lue
Dev
elop
and
com
mun
icat
e th
e EC
SA’s
val
ue to
th
e pr
ospe
ctiv
e ap
plic
ants
incl
udin
g th
e cu
rrent
da
taba
se.
5.3
Prog
ram
me
3: P
roac
tive
resp
onse
to S
ocio
-Eco
nom
ic re
quire
men
ts
Stra
tegi
c G
oal:
Engi
neer
ing
prac
titio
ners
pro
activ
ely
resp
onsi
ve to
loca
l and
nat
iona
l soc
io-e
cono
mic
requ
irem
ents
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
: Hig
h im
pact
soc
io-e
cono
mic
inte
rven
tions
in re
spon
se to
nat
iona
l and
oth
er p
riorit
ies
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 3.
1R
esea
rch
unde
rtake
n in
to s
trate
gic
cont
ribut
ions
the
prof
essi
on c
ould
be
mak
ing
to s
uppo
rt na
tiona
l pro
gram
mes
incl
udin
g bu
t no
t lim
ited
to N
DP,
NIP
and
Nat
iona
l Ben
efici
atio
n st
rate
gy
Obj
ectiv
e st
ate-
men
tC
ompr
ehen
sive
Res
earc
h in
sigh
ts to
ens
ure
an in
form
ed re
spon
se to
the
natio
nal A
gend
a
Bas
elin
eEC
SA is
see
n to
ope
rate
in is
olat
ion
and
not i
nvol
ved
with
the
soci
o-ec
onom
ic in
itiat
ives
of G
over
nmen
t. C
ounc
il re
solv
ed to
po
sitio
n its
elf t
o pr
ovid
e ex
pert
advi
ce a
nd s
olut
ions
to c
halle
nges
of e
ngin
eerin
g na
ture
.
Just
ifica
tion
ECSA
has
to b
e se
en to
be
rele
vant
to s
ocie
tal n
eeds
. The
re is
bee
n an
ove
rwhe
lmin
g ca
ll fro
m a
num
ber o
f sta
keho
lder
s fo
r EC
SA to
be
in th
e ce
ntre
sta
ge o
f pro
vidi
ng e
ngin
eerin
g so
lutio
ns.
It w
as o
bser
ved
that
EC
SA w
as n
ot re
cogn
ised
by
deci
sion
m
aker
s w
hen
look
ing
for e
xper
t adv
ice
in a
s fa
r as
engi
neer
ing
mat
ters
are
con
cern
ed.
Link
s•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 1
1 –
Cre
ate
a be
tter S
outh
Afri
ca a
nd c
ontri
bute
to a
bet
ter A
frica
and
a b
ette
r wor
ld.
• C
BE S
trate
gic
goal
1 –
A B
uilt
Envi
ronm
ent t
hat i
s re
spon
sive
to th
e de
velo
pmen
tal a
nd e
cono
mic
prio
ritie
s of
Gov
ernm
ent
• C
BE S
trate
gic
goal
3 –
An
optim
ally
fun
ctio
ning
bui
lt en
viro
nmen
t w
ith a
res
pons
ive
and
rele
vant
pol
icy
and
legi
slat
ive
fram
ewor
k ba
sed
on in
form
ed a
nd re
sear
ched
pos
ition
s.
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 3.
2EC
SA is
res
pons
ive
to d
ecis
ion
mak
ers
thro
ugh
exce
llent
sta
keho
lder
rel
atio
nshi
ps. E
CSA
is r
epre
sent
ed in
or
stru
ctur
ally
lin
ked
to k
ey G
over
nmen
t dec
isio
n m
akin
g bo
dies
and
SO
E’s
e.g.
PIC
C, N
DP,
Esk
om, T
rans
net,
Saso
l, et
c.
Obj
ectiv
e st
ate-
men
tSt
reng
then
ing
rela
tions
hips
with
key
stra
tegi
c pa
rtner
s
Bas
elin
eEC
SA n
eed
to s
treng
then
rela
tions
hips
with
key
sta
keho
lder
s th
at a
re u
sers
of e
ngin
eerin
g se
rvic
es a
nd d
ecis
ion
mak
ers
in
Gov
ernm
ent p
artic
ular
ly G
over
nmen
t dep
artm
ents
with
the
man
date
to in
frast
ruct
ure
man
date
Just
ifica
tion
ECSA
nee
ds to
est
ablis
h a
stra
tegi
c w
orki
ng re
latio
nshi
ps w
ith S
OEs
and
Gov
ernm
ent i
n or
der t
o m
ake
mea
ning
ful c
ontri
bu-
tions
to th
e so
cio-
econ
omic
nee
ds o
f the
cou
ntry
Link
s•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 2
– A
long
and
hea
lthy
life
for a
ll So
uth
Afric
ans.
•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 3
– A
ll pe
ople
in S
outh
Afri
ca a
re a
nd fe
el s
afe.
• In
dire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
9 –
Res
pons
ive,
acc
ount
able
, effe
ctiv
e an
d effi
cien
t loc
al G
over
nmen
t•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 1
1 –
Cre
ate
a be
tter S
outh
Afri
ca a
nd c
ontri
bute
to a
bet
ter A
frica
and
bet
ter w
orld
.•
Indi
rect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 1
2 –
An e
ffici
ent,
effec
tive
and
deve
lopm
ent-o
rient
ed p
ublic
ser
vice
.•
CBE
Stra
tegi
c go
al 1
– A
Bui
lt En
viro
nmen
t tha
t is
resp
onsi
ve to
the
deve
lopm
enta
l and
eco
nom
ic p
riorit
ies
of g
over
nmen
t •
CBE
Stra
tegi
c go
al 2
– A
tran
sfor
med
bui
lt en
viro
nmen
t with
app
ropr
iate
, ade
quat
e sk
ills a
nd c
ompe
tenc
ies,
resp
onsi
ve to
th
e co
untry
’s in
frast
ruct
ure
deliv
ery,
ope
ratio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce n
eeds
.
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 3.
3Pr
opos
als
are
deve
lope
d an
d im
plem
ente
d fo
r spe
cific
pro
ject
s an
d fu
ndin
g so
ught
from
Gov
ernm
ent a
nd o
ther
sta
keho
lder
s
Obj
ectiv
e st
ate-
men
tSt
rate
gic
proj
ects
are
fully
reso
urce
d in
ord
er to
resp
ond
to th
e so
cio-
econ
omic
requ
irem
ents
of t
he n
atio
n
Bas
elin
eEC
SA’s
inco
me
is d
eriv
ed fr
om th
e re
gist
ratio
n an
d an
nual
fees
of r
egis
tere
d pe
rson
s. T
he in
com
e re
ceiv
ed is
suffi
cien
t to
run
the
man
dato
ry fu
nctio
ns o
f the
Cou
ncil
at a
bre
ak-e
ven
poin
t. W
ith th
e re
cent
stra
tegi
c po
sitio
n ta
ken
by C
ounc
il to
sup
port
Gov
ernm
ent i
nitia
tives
, the
re is
a n
eed
to ra
ise
fund
s to
fund
the
stra
tegi
c pr
ojec
ts.
Just
ifica
tion
Ther
e is
a n
eed
to e
ngag
e st
rate
gic
fund
ing
partn
ers
to c
ontri
bute
tow
ards
the
initi
ativ
es a
imed
at a
ddre
ssin
g na
tiona
l so-
cio-
econ
omic
nee
ds.
Link
s•
I
ndire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
3 –
All
peop
le a
re in
Sou
th A
frica
are
and
feel
saf
e.•
I
ndire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
2 –
a lo
ng a
nd h
ealth
y lif
e fo
r all
Sout
h Af
rican
s•
I
ndire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
9 –
Res
pons
ive,
acc
ount
able
, effe
ctiv
e an
d effi
cien
t loc
al G
over
nmen
t•
I
ndire
ctly
– M
TSF
outc
omes
11
– C
reat
e a
bette
r Sou
th A
frica
and
con
tribu
te to
a b
ette
r Afri
ca a
nd b
ette
r wor
ld.
•
Ind
irect
ly –
MTS
F ou
tcom
es 1
2 –
An e
ffici
ent,
effec
tive
and
deve
lopm
ent-o
rient
ed p
ublic
ser
vice
.•
CBE
Stra
tegi
c go
al 1
– A
Bui
lt En
viro
nmen
t tha
t is
resp
onsi
ve to
the
deve
lopm
enta
l and
eco
nom
ic p
riorit
ies
of
gov
ernm
ent
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
30 31
5.3.
1 R
esou
rce
cons
ider
atio
nsTh
e pr
ogra
mm
e is
bas
ical
ly th
e av
enue
thro
ugh
whi
ch E
CSA
pos
ition
s its
elf a
s a
rele
vant
org
anis
atio
n in
the
coun
try a
nd c
omm
and
resp
ect a
s th
e en
gine
erin
g au
thor
ity.
The
prac
tice
out t
here
was
that
dec
isio
n m
aker
s w
ould
app
roac
h in
divi
dual
whe
n se
ekin
g ad
vice
on
engi
neer
ing
mat
ters
. Th
is p
rogr
amm
e is
cur
rent
ly n
ot a
ccom
mod
ated
in th
e cu
rrent
bud
get.
It is
with
the
unde
rsta
ndin
g th
at E
CSA
will
find
stra
tegi
c pa
rtner
s to
fund
su
ch in
itiat
ives
.
5.3.
2 R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Des
crip
tion
of R
isk
Prim
ary
Cau
ses
Act
ion
Plan
sLa
ck o
f a s
usta
inab
le fi
nanc
ial m
odel
M
ain
reve
nue
sour
ce (8
0% fr
om m
embe
rshi
p fe
es) d
oes
not g
uara
ntee
EC
SA’s
via
bilit
y EC
SA w
ill pr
epar
e an
d en
gage
pot
entia
l st
rate
gic
fund
ing
partn
ers
to fu
nd th
e sp
e-ci
al re
sear
ch p
roje
cts.
5.4
Prog
ram
me
4: A
sus
tain
able
, tra
nsfo
rmed
and
coh
eren
t org
anis
atio
n St
rate
gic
Goa
l: A
sust
aina
ble,
tran
sfor
med
and
coh
eren
t org
anis
atio
n th
at is
cap
able
of d
eliv
erin
g th
e im
pact
des
ired
by it
s st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd s
o-ci
ety
with
in th
e pr
ovis
ions
of t
he E
PA
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
: A c
oher
ent a
nd w
ell r
un o
rgan
isat
ion
Stra
tegi
c O
b-je
ctiv
e 4.
1A
rele
vant
org
anis
atio
n th
at s
igni
fican
tly m
eet t
he n
eeds
of b
oth
inte
rnal
and
ext
erna
l sta
keho
lder
s w
ithin
the
ECSA
man
date
.O
bjec
tive
stat
emen
tSe
t-up
syst
ems,
stru
ctur
es a
nd p
roce
sses
that
will
supp
ort t
he e
xecu
tion
of E
CSA
bus
ines
s
Bas
elin
e•
An im
prov
ed IT
infra
stru
ctur
e ha
s be
en d
evel
oped
ove
r the
pas
t rec
ent y
ears
and
is n
ot y
et la
unch
ed. T
he c
urre
ntly
use
d pl
atfo
rm is
not
ade
quat
ely
supp
ortin
g EC
SA to
del
iver
on
its m
anda
te.
• In
adeq
uacy
of f
unds
to m
oder
nise
our
sys
tem
s, s
truct
ures
and
pro
cess
es.
•
Ther
e ar
e 44
act
ive
com
mitt
ees
whi
ch p
rove
to b
e un
man
agea
ble
and
in s
ome
case
s th
eir m
anda
te o
verla
ps.
Ther
e is
a
need
to s
tream
line
the
com
mitt
ees
in o
rder
to e
ncou
rage
effi
cien
cy, e
ffect
iven
ess
and
ease
of s
uppo
rt by
adm
inis
trativ
e st
aff.
Just
ifica
tion
It is
impe
rativ
e fo
r EC
SA to
run
a co
here
nt a
nd e
ffici
ent o
rgan
isat
ion
to m
eet t
he n
eeds
of s
take
hold
ers.
Li
nks
Indi
rect
ly -
CBE
Stra
tegi
c go
al 4
– B
uilt
Envi
ronm
ent P
rofe
ssio
nals
(BEP
s) th
at o
pera
te w
ithin
a re
gula
ted
polic
y an
d le
gisl
ativ
e fra
mew
ork
5.3.
1 R
esou
rce
cons
ider
atio
ns
Ther
e w
ill be
a s
tead
y in
crea
se o
f bud
get f
or p
rogr
amm
e 4
as th
e C
ounc
il is
revi
ewin
g th
e IT
, HR
and
offi
ce s
pace
. Th
ere
is a
lso
a pr
oces
s of
st
ream
linin
g of
pol
icie
s, im
prov
emen
t of e
ffici
enci
es a
nd d
evel
opm
ent o
f qua
lity
man
agem
ent s
yste
ms.
5.3.
2 R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Des
crip
tion
of R
isk
Prim
ary
Cau
ses
Act
ion
Plan
sIn
adeq
uate
bus
ines
s co
ntin
uity
pro
cess
esN
o pl
an to
con
tinue
bus
ines
s op
erat
ions
in th
e ev
ent
of a
maj
or d
isru
ptio
n (
such
as
fire
or
pow
er fa
ilure
) to
ECSA
’s o
pera
tions
A se
rvic
e pr
ovid
er is
eng
aged
to a
sses
s th
e ris
k in
thi
s re
gard
and
mak
e re
com
men
datio
ns t
o m
itiga
te th
e ris
k.
Inap
prop
riate
stru
ctur
e an
d go
vern
ance
ove
rsig
htTh
e cu
rrent
stru
ctur
e an
d go
vern
ance
arra
nge-
men
ts a
re in
appr
opria
te a
s th
ey d
o no
t ena
ble
ECSA
to d
eliv
er s
ervi
ces
wel
l, m
eet t
he o
rgan
-is
atio
nal
obje
ctiv
es a
nd a
chie
ve s
usta
inab
le
outc
omes
.
A pr
oces
s is
und
erw
ay t
o re
view
the
Gov
er-
nanc
e st
ruct
ure
to e
ncou
rage
effi
cien
cies
and
eff
ectiv
enes
s.
Non
-com
plia
nce
with
pol
icie
s, p
roce
dure
s an
d re
gula
tions
The
orga
nisa
tion
has
not i
mpl
emen
ted
the
nec-
essa
ry s
yste
ms
and
proc
esse
s (in
clud
ing
the
rele
vant
com
plia
nce
man
agem
ent p
lans
) with
in
the
busi
ness
to e
nsur
e th
e m
eetin
g of
com
pli-
ance
obl
igat
ions
The
Qua
lity
Man
ager
has
bee
n ap
poin
ted
to
revi
ew th
e st
atus
quo
and
impl
emen
t a c
ompl
i-an
ce re
gim
e.
6 Fi
nanc
ial R
esou
rces
The
Engi
neer
ing
Cou
ncil
of S
outh
Afri
ca d
oes
not g
et a
ny g
rant
fund
ing
from
the
Gov
ernm
ent h
owev
er th
e EP
A em
pow
ers
ECSA
to c
olle
ct fe
es
from
the
regi
ster
ed p
erso
ns.
The
reve
nue
colle
cted
is s
uffici
ent t
o co
ver o
nly
prog
ram
me
1, 2
and
4.
Prog
ram
me
3 w
ill on
ly b
e im
plem
ente
d if
fund
s ca
n be
sou
rced
from
oth
er s
ourc
es.
The
budg
et fo
r the
four
pro
gram
mes
ove
r the
med
ium
term
per
iod
is a
s fo
llow
s:
Expe
nditu
re P
er P
rogr
amm
e A
udite
d R
esul
t C
urre
ntM
ediu
m-T
erm
es-
timat
eR
in T
hous
ands
14
/15
15/1
6 B
udge
t16
/17
Bud
get
17/1
8 B
udge
tPr
ogra
mm
e 1
11, 6
8715
, 691
16, 7
8917
, 964
Prog
ram
me
24,
658
6, 9
687,
456
7, 9
77Pr
ogra
mm
e 3
--
--
Prog
ram
me
455
,153
54, 1
6257
, 954
62, 0
11To
tal
71, 4
9876
, 821
82, 1
9887
, 952
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
32 33
The
follo
win
g ta
bles
sho
w th
e m
ediu
m-te
rm p
roje
cts
that
will
be u
nder
take
n pe
r pro
gram
me
to m
eet t
he s
trate
gic
goal
s of
the
orga
nisa
tion:
Prog
ram
me
1. E
duca
tion
and
Reg
istr
atio
n St
rate
gic
Goa
l: En
gine
erin
g pr
actit
ione
rs e
njoy
the
bene
fit o
f wor
ld c
lass
edu
catio
n an
d re
gist
ratio
n.
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
: An
effici
ent,
incl
usiv
e, tr
ansp
aren
t reg
istra
tion
and
educ
atio
n pr
actic
es th
at p
rom
otes
dem
and,
em
ploy
abilit
y, m
arke
tabi
lity,
m
obilit
y an
d pr
otec
tion
of w
ork
envi
ronm
ent.
Prog
ram
me
1 Pe
rfor
man
ce In
dica
tors
Perf
or-
man
ce
indi
cato
r
Prog
ram
me
perfo
rman
ce
indi
cato
r A
udite
d ac
tual
Per
form
ance
Estim
at-
ed u
n-au
dite
d pe
rfor-
man
ce
Med
ium
term
targ
ets
2010
/1120
11/12
2012
/1320
13/14
2014
/1520
15/16
2016
/1720
17/18
2018
/1920
19/20
1.1
Accr
edita
-tio
n of
all
engi
neer
-in
g pr
o-gr
amm
es
in h
ighe
r ed
ucat
ion
inst
itutio
ns
in S
outh
Af
rica
con-
duct
-ed
8
accr
ed-
itatio
n vi
sits
con-
duct
ed
12
accr
ed-
itatio
n vi
sits
Accr
edit
engi
neer
-in
g pr
o-gr
amm
es
in in
sti-
tutio
ns
of h
ighe
r le
arni
ng
acco
rd-
ing
to th
e ap
prov
ed
sche
dule
.
Accr
edit
engi
neer
-in
g pr
o-gr
amm
es
in in
sti-
tutio
ns
of h
ighe
r le
arni
ng
acco
rd-
ing
to th
e ap
prov
ed
sche
dule
.
Accr
edit
engi
neer
-in
g pr
o-gr
amm
es
in in
sti-
tutio
ns
of h
ighe
r le
arni
ng
acco
rd-
ing
to th
e ap
prov
ed
sche
dule
.
Accr
edit
engi
neer
ing
prog
ram
mes
in
inst
itu-
tions
of
high
er le
arn-
ing
acco
rd-
ing
to th
e ap
prov
ed
sche
dule
.
Accr
edit
engi
neer
-in
g pr
o-gr
amm
es
in in
sti-
tutio
ns
of h
ighe
r le
arni
ng
acco
rd-
ing
to th
e ap
prov
ed
sche
dule
.
1.2
Mai
ntai
n EC
SA’s
in
tern
atio
n-al
sta
ndin
g th
roug
h co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith in
ter-
natio
nal
acco
rds
and
agre
e-m
ents
Com
-pl
ied
with
the
requ
ire-
men
ts
for t
he
inte
rna-
tiona
l ac
cord
s an
d ag
ree-
men
ts
Com
-pl
ied
w
ith th
e re
quire
-m
ents
fo
r the
in
tern
a-tio
nal
acco
rds
and
agre
e-m
ents
Com
pli-
ance
with
th
e re
-qu
irem
ents
fo
r the
in-
tern
atio
nal
acco
rds
and
agre
e-m
ents
Com
pli-
ance
with
th
e re
-qu
irem
ents
fo
r the
in
tern
atio
n-al
acc
ords
an
d ag
ree-
men
ts
Com
pli-
ance
with
th
e re
-qu
irem
ents
fo
r the
in
tern
atio
n-al
acc
ords
an
d ag
ree-
men
ts
Com
plia
nce
with
the
re-
quire
men
ts
for t
he
inte
rnat
iona
l ac
cord
s an
d ag
reem
ents
Com
pli-
ance
with
th
e re
-qu
irem
ents
fo
r the
in
tern
atio
n-al
acc
ords
an
d ag
ree-
men
ts
Perf
or-
man
ce
indi
cato
r
Prog
ram
me
perfo
rman
ce
indi
cato
r A
udite
d ac
tual
Per
form
ance
Estim
at-
ed u
n-au
dite
d pe
rfor-
man
ce
Med
ium
term
targ
ets
2010
/1120
11/12
2012
/1320
13/14
2014
/1520
15/16
2016
/1720
17/18
2018
/1920
19/20
1.4
Prom
ote
ECSA
and
th
e pr
o-fe
ssio
n to
en
sure
pub
-lic
aw
are-
ness
of t
he
engi
neer
ing
Prof
essi
on
12
stak
e-ho
lder
co
nsul
-ta
tion
road
-sh
ows
con-
duct
ed
rega
rd-
ing
the
NR
S (S
ectio
n 36
)
12 s
take
-ho
lder
co
nsul
-ta
tion
road
show
s co
nduc
ted
rega
rdin
g th
e N
ew
Spec
ified
C
ateg
orie
s
12 s
take
-ho
lder
con
-su
ltatio
n ro
adsh
ows
cond
ucte
d re
gard
ing
the
New
Sp
ecifi
ed
Cat
egor
ies
12 s
take
-ho
lder
con
-su
ltatio
n ro
adsh
ows
cond
ucte
d re
gard
ing
the
New
Sp
ecifi
ed
Cat
egor
ies
12 s
take
-ho
lder
co
nsul
tatio
n ro
adsh
ows
cond
ucte
d re
gard
ing
the
New
Sp
ecifi
ed
Cat
egor
ies
12 s
take
-ho
lder
con
-su
ltatio
n ro
adsh
ows
cond
ucte
d re
gard
ing
the
New
Sp
ecifi
ed
Cat
egor
ies
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
34 35
1.5
To re
tain
re
gist
ered
pe
rson
s w
ith E
CSA
by
80%
ye
ar o
n ye
ar.
--
--
-D
evel
op-
men
t and
im
plem
en-
tatio
n of
a
rete
ntio
n st
rate
gy
Dev
elop
-m
ent a
nd
impl
emen
-ta
tion
of a
re
tent
ion
stra
tegy
Dev
elop
-m
ent a
nd
impl
emen
-ta
tion
of a
re
tent
ion
stra
tegy
Dev
elop
-m
ent a
nd
impl
emen
-ta
tion
of a
re
tent
ion
stra
tegy
Dev
elop
-m
ent a
nd
impl
emen
-ta
tion
of a
re
tent
ion
stra
tegy
1.
6C
reat
ion
of
addi
tiona
l sp
ecifi
ed
cate
gorie
s
--
--
-In
vest
igat
e po
ssib
le
cate
gorie
s of
regi
s-tra
tion
and
open
reg-
istra
tion
for
1 sp
ecifi
ed
cate
gorie
s
Impl
emen
t 3
x re
gis-
tratio
n of
sp
ecifi
ed
cate
gorie
s
Impl
emen
t 3
x re
gis-
tratio
n of
sp
ecifi
ed
cate
gorie
s
Impl
emen
t 3
x re
gis-
tratio
n of
sp
ecifi
ed
cate
gorie
s
Impl
emen
t 3
x re
gis-
tratio
n of
sp
ecifi
ed
cate
gorie
s
Perf
or-
man
ce
indi
cato
r
Prog
ram
me
perfo
rman
ce
indi
cato
r A
udite
d ac
tual
Per
form
ance
Estim
at-
ed u
n-au
dite
d pe
rfor-
man
ce
Med
ium
term
targ
ets
2010
/1120
11/12
2012
/1320
13/14
2014
/1520
15/16
2016
/1720
17/18
2018
/1920
19/20
1.7
Supp
ort
engi
neer
ing
stud
ents
th
roug
h Sa
khim
fun-
do e
duca
-tio
n Tr
ust
Fully
re
gist
er
the
ed-
ucat
ion
trust
an
d pi
lot
engi
-ne
erin
g st
uden
t de
vel-
opm
ent
pro-
gram
me
with
1
terti
ary
inst
itu-
tion
Rol
l-out
th
e en
gi-
neer
ing
stud
ent
deve
lop-
men
t pro
-gr
amm
e to
1 m
ore
terti
ary
inst
itutio
ns
Rol
l-out
th
e en
gi-
neer
ing
stud
ent
deve
lop-
men
t pro
-gr
amm
e to
3 m
ore
terti
ary
inst
itutio
ns
Rol
l-out
th
e en
gi-
neer
ing
stud
ent
deve
lop-
men
t pro
-gr
amm
e to
3 m
ore
terti
ary
inst
itutio
ns
Rol
l-out
the
engi
neer
ing
stud
ent d
e-ve
lopm
ent
prog
ram
me
to 3
mor
e te
rtiar
y in
sti-
tutio
ns
Rol
l-out
th
e en
gi-
neer
ing
stud
ent
deve
lop-
men
t pro
-gr
amm
e to
3 m
ore
terti
ary
inst
itutio
ns
1.8
A fu
nctio
nal
user
-frie
nd-
ly o
nloi
ne
CPD
sys
-te
m
--
--
-In
vest
i-ga
te a
nd
impl
emen
t an
onl
ine
CPD
sys
-te
m
Mon
itorin
g an
d im
-pr
ovem
ent
of th
e on
-lin
e C
PD
syst
em
Prog
ram
me
2: P
ublic
aw
aren
ess
of th
e en
gine
erin
g pr
ofes
sion
Stra
tegi
c G
oal:
Publ
ic a
war
enes
s of
the
prof
essi
on a
nd it
s st
anda
rds
and
regu
latio
n to
ens
ure
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
thos
e st
anda
rds
in th
e pu
blic
in
tere
st.
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
: An
info
rmed
pub
lic th
at c
an h
old
the
prof
essi
on a
ccou
ntab
le to
the
regu
lato
ry s
tand
ards
Prog
ram
me
2 Pe
rfor
man
ce In
dica
tors
Perf
orm
ance
in
dica
tor
Prog
ram
me
perfo
rman
ce
indi
cato
r A
udite
d ac
tual
Per
for-
man
ce
Estim
ated
un
audi
ted
perfo
r-m
ance
Med
ium
term
targ
ets
2010
/1120
11/12
2012
/1320
13/14
2014
/1520
15/16
2016
/1720
17/18
2018
/1920
19/20
2.1
Dis
sem
ina-
tion
of in
for-
mat
ion
on
engi
neer
ing
activ
ities
--
--
Laun
ched
a
capa
city
bu
ildin
g co
mpe
ndi-
um
Dev
elop
-m
ent o
f ca
paci
ty
build
ing
initi
ativ
es
Impl
emen
-ta
tion
of
the
capa
c-ity
bui
ldin
g in
itiat
ives
Impl
emen
-ta
tion
and
mon
itor-
ing
of th
e ca
paci
ty
build
ing
initi
ativ
es
Impl
emen
-ta
tion
and
mon
itor-
ing
of th
e ca
paci
ty
build
ing
initi
ativ
es
Impl
emen
-ta
tion
and
mon
itor-
ing
of th
e ca
paci
ty
build
ing
initi
ativ
es2.
2 Fi
nalis
atio
n of
dis
ci-
plin
ary
cas-
es b
y 10
0%
--
--
final
ise
20%
of
disc
i-pl
inar
y ca
ses
back
log
Fina
lise
80%
of
disc
i-pl
inar
y ca
ses
back
log
and
90%
of
cur
rent
di
sci-
plin
ary
case
s.
Fina
lise
100%
of
disc
iplin
ary
case
s ba
cklo
g an
d 10
0%
of c
urre
nt
disc
iplin
ary
case
s.
Fina
lise
100%
of
disc
iplin
ary
case
s ba
cklo
g an
d 10
0%
of c
urre
nt
disc
iplin
ary
case
s.
Fina
lise
100%
of
disc
iplin
ary
case
s ba
cklo
g an
d 10
0%
of c
urre
nt
disc
iplin
ary
case
s.
Fina
lise
100%
of
disc
iplin
ary
case
s ba
cklo
g an
d 10
0%
of c
urre
nt
disc
iplin
ary
case
s.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
36 37
2.3
Impr
ove
the
turn
-aro
und
time
to
100%
fina
li-sa
tion
with
in
6 m
onth
s
--
--
-im
prov
e th
e tu
rn-
arou
nd
time
to
80%
fi-
nalis
atio
n w
ithin
6
mon
ths
impr
ove
the
turn
-ar
ound
tim
e to
10
0%
final
isat
ion
with
in 6
m
onth
s
impr
ove
the
turn
-ar
ound
tim
e to
10
0%
final
isat
ion
with
in 6
m
onth
s
impr
ove
the
turn
-aro
und
time
to
100%
fina
li-sa
tion
with
in
6 m
onth
s
impr
ove
the
turn
-ar
ound
tim
e to
10
0%
final
isat
ion
with
in 6
m
onth
sPe
rfor
man
ce
indi
cato
rPr
ogra
mm
e pe
rform
ance
in
dica
tor
Aud
ited
actu
al P
erfo
r-m
ance
Estim
ated
un
audi
ted
perfo
r-m
ance
Med
ium
term
targ
ets
2010
/1120
11/12
2012
/1320
13/14
2014
/1520
15/16
2016
/1720
17/18
2018
/1920
19/20
2.4
Prom
otio
n of
hi
gh le
vels
of
Pro
fes-
sion
al e
thic
s by
col
labo
-ra
tion
with
em
ploy
er
bodi
es to
up
hold
the
code
of
cond
uct a
nd
prom
ote
a co
nduc
ive
wor
king
en-
viro
nmen
t
--
--
-En
gage
-m
ent o
f em
ploy
er
bodi
es
for t
he
deve
lop-
men
t of a
fra
mew
ork
of c
olla
bo-
ratio
n an
d en
ter i
nto
an M
oU
with
2
empl
oyer
bo
dies
Impl
emen
-ta
tion
of
the
MoU
w
ith 2
id
entifi
ed
empl
oyer
bo
dies
Expa
nd
the
Impl
e-m
enta
tion
of th
e M
oU
to 4
mor
e id
entifi
ed
empl
oyer
bo
dies
Expa
nd th
e Im
plem
en-
tatio
n of
the
MoU
to 4
ad
ditio
nal
iden
tified
em
ploy
er
bodi
es
Expa
nd
the
Impl
e-m
enta
tion
of th
e M
oU to
4
addi
tiona
l id
entifi
ed
empl
oyer
bo
dies
Prog
ram
me
3: P
roac
tive
resp
onse
to S
ocio
-Eco
nom
ic re
quire
men
ts
Stra
tegi
c G
oal:
Engi
neer
ing
prac
titio
ners
pro
activ
ely
resp
onsi
ve to
loca
l and
nat
iona
l soc
io-e
cono
mic
requ
irem
ents
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
: Hig
h im
pact
soc
io-e
cono
mic
inte
rven
tions
in re
spon
se to
nat
iona
l and
oth
er p
riorit
ies
Prog
ram
me
3 Pe
rfor
man
ce In
dica
tors
Perf
or-
man
ce
indi
cato
r
Prog
ram
me
perfo
rman
ce
indi
cato
r A
udite
d ac
tual
Per
form
ance
Estim
ated
un
audi
ted
perfo
r-m
ance
Med
ium
term
targ
ets
2010
/1120
11/12
2012
/1320
13/14
2014
/1520
15/16
2016
/1720
17/18
2018
/1920
19/20
3.1
Con
duct
re
sear
ch to
co
ntrib
ute
in
addr
essi
ng
soci
o-ec
o-no
mic
cha
l-le
nges
of
the
coun
try
--
--
-C
on-
duct
2 x
re
sear
ch
proj
ects
Con
duct
2
x re
sear
ch
proj
ects
Con
duct
3
x re
sear
ch
proj
ects
Con
duct
3
x re
sear
ch
proj
ects
Con
duct
3
x re
sear
ch
proj
ects
Perf
or-
man
ce
indi
cato
r
Prog
ram
me
perfo
rman
ce
indi
cato
r A
udite
d ac
tual
Per
form
ance
Estim
ated
un
audi
ted
perfo
r-m
ance
Med
ium
term
targ
ets
2010
/1120
11/12
2012
/1320
13/14
2014
/1520
15/16
2016
/1720
17/18
2018
/1920
19/20
3.2
Ente
r int
o ag
ree-
men
ts w
ith
deci
sion
m
aker
s fo
r hi
gh im
pact
in
terv
entio
n in
offe
ring
engi
neer
ing
solu
tions
--
--
-4
X M
oUs
sign
ed
with
any
G
over
n-m
ent D
e-pa
rtmen
t or
SO
Es
4 ad
ditio
n-al
MoU
s si
gned
with
an
y G
ov-
ernm
ent
Dep
art-
men
t or
SOEs
4 ad
ditio
n-al
MoU
s si
gned
with
an
y G
ov-
ernm
ent
Dep
art-
men
t or
SOEs
4 ad
ditio
n-al
MoU
s si
gned
with
an
y G
over
n-m
ent D
e-pa
rtmen
t or
SOEs
4 ad
ditio
n-al
MoU
s si
gned
with
an
y G
ov-
ernm
ent
Dep
art-
men
t or
SOEs
3.3
Rai
se fu
nds
to im
ple-
men
t the
st
rate
gic
proj
ects
--
--
-D
evel
-op
2 x
fu
ndin
g pr
opos
als
Dev
elop
2
x fu
ndin
g pr
opos
als
and
man
-ag
emen
t of
the
fund
ing
agre
emen
t fro
m th
e pr
evio
us
year
.
Dev
elop
2
x fu
ndin
g pr
opos
als
and
man
-ag
emen
t of
the
fund
ing
agre
emen
t fro
m th
e pr
evio
us
year
.
Dev
elop
2
x fu
ndin
g pr
opos
als
and
man
-ag
emen
t of
the
fund
ing
agre
emen
t fro
m th
e pr
evio
us
year
.
Dev
elop
2
x fu
ndin
g pr
opos
als
and
man
-ag
emen
t of
the
fund
ing
agre
emen
t fro
m th
e pr
evio
us
year
.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
38 39
Prog
ram
me
4: A
sus
tain
able
, tra
nsfo
rmed
and
coh
eren
t Org
anis
atio
nal
Stra
tegi
c G
oal:
A su
stai
nabl
e, tr
ansf
orm
ed a
nd c
oher
ent o
rgan
isat
ion
that
is c
apab
le o
f del
iver
ing
the
impa
ct d
esire
d by
its
stak
ehol
ders
and
so
ciet
y
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
: A c
oher
ent a
nd w
ell r
un o
rgan
isat
ion
Prog
ram
me
4: P
erfo
rman
ce In
dica
tors
Perf
or-
man
ce
indi
cato
r
Prog
ram
me
perfo
r-m
ance
in
dica
tor
Aud
ited
actu
al P
erfo
rman
ceEs
timat
-ed
una
u-di
ted
perfo
r-m
ance
Med
ium
term
targ
ets
2010
/11
2011
/12
2012
/13
2013
/14
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
2019
/20
4.1
Rev
iew
of
the
orga
n-is
atio
nal
stru
ctur
e to
sup
port
ECSA
stra
t-eg
y
--
--
-R
evie
w
all e
xist
-in
g EC
SA
com
mit-
tees
and
or
gani
-sa
tiona
l st
ruct
ure
an
d m
ake
reco
m-
men
da-
tions
for
impr
ove-
men
t
Impl
emen
-ta
tion
of
the
rec-
omm
enda
-tio
ns fr
om
the
repo
rt
Mon
itorin
g an
d im
-pr
ovem
ent
of th
e im
plem
en-
tatio
n of
th
e re
com
-m
enda
-tio
ns
Mon
itorin
g an
d im
-pr
ovem
ent
of th
e im
ple-
men
tatio
n of
th
e re
com
-m
enda
tions
Mon
itorin
g an
d im
-pr
ovem
ent
of th
e im
plem
en-
tatio
n of
th
e re
com
-m
enda
-tio
ns
4.2
Rev
iew
of
EC
SA
gove
rnan
ce
polic
ies
--
--
-R
evie
w o
f ex
istin
g G
over
-na
nce
polic
ies
Impl
an-
tatio
n of
th
e re
c-om
men
-da
tions
of
the
revi
ew
repo
rt
Mon
itorin
g an
d im
-pr
ovem
ent
of th
e im
plem
en-
tatio
n of
th
e re
com
-m
enda
-tio
ns
Mon
itorin
g an
d im
-pr
ovem
ent
of th
e im
ple-
men
tatio
n of
th
e re
com
-m
enda
tions
Mon
itorin
g an
d im
-pr
ovem
ent
of th
e im
plem
en-
tatio
n of
th
e re
com
-m
enda
-tio
ns
4.3
ISO
900
1 C
ertifi
ed
man
age-
men
t sys
-te
m
--
--
-D
evel
op-
men
t of
the
QM
S sy
stem
s fo
r the
en-
tire
orga
ni-
satio
n
Impl
emen
-ta
tion
of
the
QM
S sy
stem
s
Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alu-
atio
n
Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
-tio
nC
ertifi
catio
n of
qua
lity
man
age-
men
t sys
tem
Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alu-
atio
n
Perf
or-
man
ce
indi
cato
r
Prog
ram
me
perfo
r-m
ance
in
dica
tor
Aud
ited
actu
al P
erfo
rman
ceEs
timat
-ed
una
u-di
ted
perfo
r-m
ance
Med
ium
term
targ
ets
2010
/11
2011
/12
2012
/13
2013
/14
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
2019
/20
4.4
Effec
tive
man
age-
men
t of
ECSA
fin
ance
s
Unq
ual-
ified
au
dit
opin
ion
Unq
ual-
ified
au
dit
opin
ion
Unq
ual-
ified
au
dit
opin
ion
Unq
ual-
ified
au
dit
opin
ion
Unq
ual-
ified
au
dit
opin
ion
Unq
uali-
fied
audi
t op
inio
n
Unq
uali-
fied
audi
t op
inio
n
Unq
uali-
fied
audi
t op
inio
n
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t opi
nion
Unq
uali-
fied
audi
t op
inio
n
4.5
Enha
nced
in
form
atio
n M
anag
e-m
ent I
nfra
-st
ruct
ure
to s
uppo
rt EC
SA b
usi-
ness
--
--
-In
vest
igat
e ap
pro-
pria
te IT
in
frast
ruc-
ture
to
supp
ort
ECSA
bu
sine
ss
Impl
emen
-ta
tion
of
the
reco
m-
men
ded
IT
infra
stru
c-tu
re.
Mon
itorin
g of
the
rec-
omm
ende
d IT
infra
-st
ruct
ure.
Mon
itorin
g of
the
rec-
omm
ende
d IT
infra
stru
c-tu
re.
Mon
itorin
g of
the
rec-
omm
ende
d IT
infra
-st
ruct
ure.
4.6
Incr
ease
re
venu
e co
llect
ion
--
--
Rev
enue
in
crea
se
by 8
%
annu
ally
Rev
enue
in
crea
se
by 8
%
annu
ally
Rev
enue
in
crea
se
by 8
%
annu
ally
Rev
enue
in
crea
se b
y 8%
ann
ually
Rev
enue
in
crea
se
by 8
%
annu
ally
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
40 41
7. Governance The Council The Engineering Professions Act 2000, (Act 46 of 2000) establishes council as the highest governing body and accounting authority of the ECSA. The Council is appointed by the Minister of Public Works, as the Executive Authority, in terms of section 3 and is composed of 50 non-executive members as follows:
• Section 3(1)(a) – thirty (30) registered persons, excluding candidates , of whom at least 20 are actively • practicing in the engineering profession • Section 3 (1)(b) – ten (10) persons of whom at least 6 must be professionals in the service of the State.• Section 3(1)(c) – ten (10) members of the public nominated through an open process of public par-
ticipation.
The Council has previously established 44 committees to enable it to execute its mandate, nine (9) of those are high impact committees that report to Council. The rest are sub-ordinate committees to the high impact committees. The 44 committees are established to carry out the mandate of ECSA and the registration sys-tem heavily relies on volunteers and peer review judgement. Given the new strategy, the committees are currently under review for realignment.
A. Statutory Committees
• Investigations committee (as prescribed in the EPA)• Audit, Compliance and Risk Committee (as prescribed and mandated in the Public Finance Management
Act (PFMA)
B. Committees of Council
• Central registration committee • Finance and staff committee• Strategic advisory committee• Education committee• Transformation committee • International Affairs committee• Engineering Standards Generating body
C. Sub-Committees of Council
• Legal matters committee• Communications and information committee• Joint implementation committee• Fees Committee• Identification of Engineering Work Committee • Information and technology Committee • Deans Advisory Committee• Voluntary Associations Committee• Technology Standards Generating Group• Engineering Programme Qualification and Examination Committee• Technology programme Qualifications and Examination Committee• Registrations committee: Technologists • Registrations committee: Engineers• Registrations committee: Technicians • Registrations committee: Lift Inspectors
• Registrations committee: Lifting Machinery Inspectors• Registrations committee: Medical Equipment Maintainers• Registrations committee: Fire Protection Systems Inspectors • Registrations committee: Certificated Engineers• Specified Categories committee• Continuing Professional Development • Professional Advisory committee: Civil• Professional Advisory committee: Aeronautical• Professional Advisory committee: Electrical• Professional Advisory committee: Chemical• Professional Advisory committee: Mechanical• Professional Advisory committee: Metallurgical• Professional Advisory committee: Agricultural • Professional Advisory committee: Mining • Professional Advisory committee: Industrial
INVESTIGATING COMMITTEE (IC)
The Investigating committee is composed of 20 members and is charged with the following responsibilities:
I. To investigate matters and to obtain evidence to determine whether or not, in its opinion, a registered person may be charged for breach of the Code of Conduct and, if so, torecommend to council the charge or charges that may be preferred against that registeredperson and if not, to recommend to Council that charges not be preferred against thatregistered person
II. The committee may, when it becomes aware of engineering related undertakings or unsoundengineering practices that may prejudice public health and safety and the environment,investigate such undertakings and report to the CEO its findings and recommendations.
Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee (ARC)
The ARC committee is composed of 6 members and is charged with the following responsibilities:The committee has the following specific responsibilities:
I. Integrated reporting
The Committee oversees integrated reporting, and in particular the Committee must:
a. give regard to all factors and risks that may impact on the integrity of the integrated report, including factors that may predispose management to present a misleading picture, significant judgements and reporting decisions made, monitoring or enforcement actions by a regulatory body, any evidence that brings into question previously published information, and forward-looking statements or information;
b. review the annual financial statements;c. comment in the annual financial statements on the financial status, the accounting practices and the effec-
tiveness of the internal financial controls;d. review the disclosure of sustainability issues in the integrated report to ensure that it is reliable and does
not conflict with the financial information;e. recommend to Council the engagement of an external assurance provider on material sustainability is-
sues; andf. recommend the integrated report for approval by the Council.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
42 43
II. Combined assuranceThe Committee ensures that a combined assurance model is applied to provide aCoordinated approach to all assurance activities, and in particular the Committee must:
a. to adopt and apply an internationally Combined Assurance Framework;b. make sure that the combined assurance received is appropriate to address all the significant risks facing the organisation; andc. monitor the relationship between the external assurance providers and the organisation.
III. Governance and complianceThe Committee is responsible for overseeing governance and compliance and must:
a. ensure compliance to the prescripts of the PFMA;b. establish an Ethics Committee;c. monitor the application of good governance principles by ECSA;d. monitor the progress of governance implementation plans; ande. review and monitor the process in place to ensure that ECSA complies with all relevant legal and statutory requirements.
IV. Internal auditThe Committee is responsible for overseeing the internal audit, and in particular theCommittee must:
a. have input into the appointment, performance assessment and/or dismissal of the Internal Auditor;b. approve the Annual Internal Audit Plan;c. evaluate the performance of the internal audit function;d. ensure that the internal audit function is subject to an independent quality review, as and when the Committee determines it appropriate; ande. receive and oversee internal audit results and recommendations.
V. Risk managementThe Committee is an integral component of the risk management process and specificallythe Committee must:
a. to adopt and apply an internationally accepted Risk Management Framework;b. oversee the development and annual review of a policy and plan for risk management to recommend for approval to the Council;c. monitor implementation of the policy and plan for risk management through risk management systems and processes;d. monitor the dissemination of the risk management plan throughout the organisation, and integration into the day-to-day activities of the organisation;e. ensure that risk management assessments are performed on a continuous basis;f. ensure that frameworks and methodologies are implemented to increase the possibility of anticipating unpredictable risks;g. ensure that management considers and implements appropriate risk responses;h. ensure that continuous risk monitoring by management takes place;i. express the Committee’s formal opinion to the Council on the effectiveness of the system and process of risk management; andj. review reporting concerning risk management that is to be included in the integrated report for timeliness, completeness and relevance.
VI. External auditThe Committee is responsible for recommending the appointment of the external auditor andto oversee the external audit process. In this regard the Committee must:
a. nominate the external auditor for appointment by the Council;b. approve the terms of engagement and remuneration for the external audit engagement;c. monitor and report on the independence of the external auditor in the annual financial statements;d. define a policy for non-audit services provided by the external auditor;e. pre-approve the contracts for non-audit services to be rendered by the external auditor; andf. review the quality and effectiveness of the external audit process.
CENTRAL REGISTRATION COMMITTEE (CRC)
The Central Registration Committee is composed of 16 members and is charged with the following respon-sibilities:
I. To consider and decide on procedures and policy matters relating to registration, in so far
as they are common to the four professional registration committees and registration committees for specified categories; to provide oversight regarding registration matters; and to act as central liaison committee for external contact;
II. To consider and decide on recommendations relating to the refusal of applications fromeach registration committee, provided that the Committee must, if it does not agree with aparticular recommendation of any registration committee, refer such recommendation backto such registration committee for reconsideration and furnish its reasons for refusal and,furthermore, provided, that in the event that the Committee and such registrationcommittee are unable to agree on a decision, the matter must be referred to the Council fora decision;
III. To review standards, policies and procedures set by the individual registration committeespertaining to their individual requirements, only in so far as such standards, policies andprocedures are inconsistent with the general policies of the Council, provided that theCommittee may not amend such standards, policies or procedures unless it has firstobtained the agreement of the registration committee concerned and, furthermore,provided, that in the event that the Committee and such registration committee are unableto agree on a standard, policy or procedure, the matter must be referred to the Council fora decision; and
IV. To satisfy itself, when considering a decision of, or a recommendation by, any of theregistration committees, that such a registration committee has duly applied its mind (interms of procedure and merit) to any such decision or recommendation.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
44 45
FINANCE AND STAFF COMMITTEE (F&S)
The finance and Staff committee is composed of 6 members and is charged with the following responsibilities:
I. Consider the annual budget and recommend to Council for approval;II. Review annual financial statements;III. Monitor and periodically report on all income and expenditure to Council;IV. In collaboration with the CEO, decide on investment policies for purposes of optimally investing Council’s funds within the limits provided for in the Act;V. Subject to the above, approve additional unbudgeted expenditure to a maximum of 5% of the Council’s expenditure budget in any particular financial year;VI. To approve, in concurrence with the CEO, the staff organisation structureVII. Grant exemption from payment of annual fees, or any part thereof, to any person registered in terms of the Act, in accordance with any policy approved by Council pertaining to exemptions; which function is delegated to the CEO;VIII. Grant exemption from payment of any arrear annual fees, reverse the cancellation of the
registration of any person whose registration has been cancelled due to inadvertent nonpaymentof annual fees, recover any arrear annual fees or other monies payable toCouncil or to write off any arrear annual fees or monies payable to Council which proveimpracticable to recover; the function of which is delegated to the CEO;
IX. Determine the quantum of annual increases for all staff;X. Determine the annual increase and/or other salary related benefits for the CEO for implementation by the Chairperson of the Committee, andXI. Within the boundaries of current employment legislation and practices, consider and approve human resource policies and conditions of employment recommended by the CEO for final approval by Council.
STRATEGIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE (SAC)
The Strategic Advisory Committee is composed of 12 members and is charged with the following responsi-bilities
I. To integrate change as necessary and participate in the periodic review of a long-term strategic objectives, deliverables and the integrated strategic plan for approval by Council;II. To lead investigations into critical long-term trends in partnership with relevant other
parties, including established research, academic and government institutions;III. To lead investigations into issues of national crisis in as far as it relates to engineeringsuch as electricity, water, sewage and infrastructure and recommend sustainable short,medium and long-term solutions to enable Council to advise the appropriate GovernmentDepartments;
IV. To advise and provide directions and recommend possible solutions to the pipeline forengineering skills development and the marketing of the profession to educate and attractlearners to build the future engineering skills pipeline;
V. To advise on initiatives to ensure the long-term sustainability of the engineering profession through conducting research to highlighted areas for improvement and providing possible sustainable solutions thereof;VI. To advise on appropriate stakeholder engagement through participation in existing fora
and the creation of new stakeholder forums where necessary;VII. To contribute to reviews of implementation or progress in achieving the objectives ofECSA’s Strategic Plan;
VIII. To advise on the development of international partnerships and networks of expertise on planning;IX. To advise on the effectiveness and efficiency of ECSA in carrying out its duties in terms of the Act;
X. To manage/advise on strategic projectsXI. To consolidate and report on issues of strategic importanceXII. To prepare position papers if required.
EDUCATION COMMITTEE (EC)
The Education Committee is composed of 11 members and is charged with the following responsibilities:
To generally advise the Council on matters of education in so far as they impact on policy andstandards relating to engineering education, and more specifically to:
I. Formulate policies, position papers and other work products;II. Assess the general state or aspects of engineering education;III. Disseminate information that it considers relevant to engineering education within ECSA, education providers, industry or other relevant communities;IV. Consult with education policy makers and education providers and exchange information with them through appropriate mechanisms, including the Deans Advisory Committee;V. Consult with engineering employers and exchange information with them through appropriate mechanisms;VI. Engage in initiatives that promote the interests and improvement of engineering and related education, particularly by influencing policy and practice through appropriate channels; VII. Co-ordinate the activities and exercise oversight of the accreditation committees, although, the EC may
not invalidate a decision made by an accreditation committee in respect of a programme: provided that if the EC has reason to be concerned about a particular decision, it must refer the matter back to the accreditation committee and if still concerned must inform the Council accordingly; and
VIII. Withdraw accreditation from a programme on the recommendation of an accreditation committee.
TRANSFORMATION COMMITTEE (TC)
The Strategic Advisory Committee is composed of 8 members and is charged with the following responsibil-ities
I. Determine ECSA’s Transformation Framework.II. Determine transformation imperatives in areas outside ECSA’s mandate but within its operational and functional influence.III. Ensure that transformation permeates ECSA’s strategy.IV. Set transformation milestones and measurements across all spheres, structures and programmes of ECSA.V. Determine remedies for areas that lack success with regard to transformation, and monitor implementation thereof.VI. Ensure compliance with transformation imperatives in all applicable laws and regulations.
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE (IAC)
The International Affairs Committee is composed of 12 members and is charged with the following responsibilities:
These responsibilities must be read in tandem with those of the three Accreditation Committees:Engineering Programme Accreditation Committee (EPAC), Technology Programme AccreditationCommittee (TPAC) and Certificated Engineers Accreditation Committee (CERTAC). The
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
46 47
responsibilities below are not intended to usurp the responsibilities any of the abovementioned Accreditation Committees nor those of the related Registration Committees. The intention is for the IAC to serve as liaison between structures that govern the five IEA Agreements and any Mutual Exemption Agreements and the relevant Accreditation and Registration Committees.
I. To consider and advise on policy, procedures and issues relating to all international matters,in so far as these matters affect ECSA and its international partners as enabled by section13.(e) of the Act, and to advise Council on matters pertaining to issues of internationalimportance regarding engineering competencies practices and developments;
II. To specifically promote, coordinate and advise in regard to Educational Accords and Mobility Forum agreements as it pertains to mutual recognition in respect to*:
a. The Washington Accord;b. The Sydney Accord;c. The Dublin Accord;d. International Professional Engineers Agreement (IPEA) (Formerly known ase. The Engineers Mobility Forum (EMF));f. International Engineering Technologist Agreement (IETA) (Formerly known asg. The Engineering Technologist Mobility Forum (ETMF));h. The Commonwealth Engineers Council;i. Mutual Exemption Agreements; andj. African Initiatives, inclusive of continental and regional initiatives;* The list is extensive but not exhaustive.
III To advise the CEO, in collaboration with the relevant ECSA Committee(s), regarding compliance by ECSA of any agreement entered into between ECSA and signatories to any such agreement;IV To advise on the revision of the policy on international travel;V To deploy, in consultation with the CEO, competent representatives to international meetings;VI To monitor compliance of international agreements and guide the administration on any obligations imposed by such an agreement, entered into by ECSA.VII To advise Council on whether to join a new international body inclusive of World Federation of Engineering Organisations (WFEO) and Commission on Engineering Capacity Building
ENGINEERING STANDARDS GENERATING BODY (ESGB)
The Engineering Standards Generating body is composed of 13 members and is charged with the following responsibilities:
The committee has the following specific responsibilities:I. The field of standards generation for which the Committee will be responsible, will cover the following scope:
a) To determine the purpose of the definition of the field and analyse its content;b) To define the boundaries of discrete fields in terms of the value added by the field including, but not restricted to process, product or service related to other fields;c) To identify traditional and non-traditional areas of study, occupational categories, technology and environment associated with the field;d) To project or forecast the linkage between the field and the national economy 3, 5 and 10 years hence including, but not limited to, predicting whether the field is likely to grow, shrink or become ob-solete, and what its importance to the economy is likely to be and in what way it is likely to change; e) To ensure, by independent assessment, that the field as defined is complete;f) To identify discrete sub-fields by analyzing its value-added component;g) To identify the impact of existing and proposed legislation on fields, sub-fields and levels, and plan accordingly;
II. The Committee shall:a) Generate competency standards and qualifications in consultation with the relevant Quality Coun-
cil(s) [QC(s)] in identified sub-fields and levels;b) Update and review competency standards and/or qualifications;c) Consult interested and affected parties;d) Recommend standards and qualifications to the relevant QCs;e) Recommend criteria for the registration of assessors and moderators or moderating bodies; andf) Perform such other functions as may from time-to-time be delegated to it by the Council.
III. The Committee will develop and recommend to Council for final approval the relevant competency standards and qualification standards for levels 5 to 10 on the National Qualifications Framework (NQF) in compliance with the requirements of one or all of the following QCs:
a) CHE and its Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC);b) Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO); andc) Umalusi.
IV. In performing its relevant role and functions, the Committee shall, subject to its scope of standards generation:
a) Abide by the decisions of the relevant QCs relating to the development and implementation of the NQF;b) Consult with experts in the defined field concerning the accuracy and acceptability of the results of such activities and subject such results to their scrutiny;c) Submit the results of such activities to the relevant QCs for publication on the NQF; andd) Ensure that the results of such activities are subjected to the scrutiny of the relevant interested and affected parties, prior to submission to Council.
ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
48 49
PART C: LINKS TO OTHER PLANS
1. Risk Management Plan
ECSA is supported by internal audit service provider and have developed a risk register that is updated on annual basis in line with section 51(1)(a)(i) of the Public Finance Management Act, although ECSA is not required by law to comply with the PFMA. The Audit, Risk and compliance committee oversees risk man-agement and report to Council.
2. Fraud Prevention Plan
ECSA has no fraud prevention plan in place. Management plan to develop one in the current reporting and will be reflected in the APP for the coming financial year including the gift register policy. As an interim mea-sure, ECSA established a supply chain office during the previous financial year in order to be aligned to best practice in procurement processes. Below is a brief description of the processes implemented to minimise conflict of interest in supply chain management.
2.1. SCM Policy requires that any official who participates in procurement processes such as BEC/BAC members must complete a “conflict of interest” declaration and confidentiality agreement prior to the commencement of the evaluation/adjudication process. No official who has an interest (or whose relative or friend has an interest) in a particular offer will be allowed to participate in the evaluation, consideration and adjudi cation of the relevant tender/bid or quotes.
2.2 Bidders are expected to complete a” Declaration of interest questionnaire” (SBD 4 Form) whenever they compete for a tender, this is for bidder to indicate if there is a conflict of interest or not.
2.3. SCM Officials always observe segregation of duties (where one official cannot start a transaction until thefinal stage) whenever they do transactions either electronically or manually. For example, the Procure-ment system does not allow an SCM officer to capture requisition, request quotes and issue a purchase order-different officials are required to do transactions between the processes. Furthermore, the suppli-ers database system automatically and randomly selects suppliers for quotations. SCM Delegation of authority regulates approval powers of officials as per prescribed thresholds.
2.4. The newly acquired Lexis system assists in checking the registered owners/shareholders of a particular service provider.
3. Materiality Framework
ECSA has not developed a framework in this regard. It will be developed in the new financial year.
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.za
ECSA | www.ecsa.co.zaENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA STRATEGIC PLAN
50 51