13
Strategic Local Plan (SLP) 18 October 2012

Strategic Local Plan (SLP)

  • Upload
    tacey

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Strategic Local Plan (SLP). 18 October 2012. The process to date. Strategic Local Plan (SLP) – overarching policies, principles and spatial vision. Level and location of sustainable development. [Core Strategy]. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Strategic Local Plan (SLP)

18 October 2012

The process to date • Strategic Local Plan (SLP) – overarching policies, principles and spatial

vision. Level and location of sustainable development. [Core Strategy].

• To be followed by: Detailed Local Plan (DLP) – detailed policies; including site allocations, new proposals maps and comprehensive suite of policies.

• Four SLP/Core Strategy ConsultationsJoint Issues and Options Consultation, 2006 Core Strategy Issues and Options, 2007Emerging Core Strategy, 2009Shaping Our Community, The Core Strategy: Consultation on the spatial strategy for locating future development in the District, 2010/11

• Sustainability Appraisal process – ongoing throughout

• PPAP Meetings Summer 2011 – draft Core Strategy presented and discussed in full - since then process of refinement and evidence

What SLP content has changed and what has not

• Since PPAP Meetings Summer 2011

• Approach and Justification - post National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) – fundamentally about Sustainable Development, when NPPF viewed as a whole

• Further work on the Evidence Base

• What is Sustainable Development in this district?

• Local Economy - vital role that quality of life factors play in supporting the local intellectual capital economy

• Bottom up capacity investigation of urban areas and previously developed land

• Environmental capacity of the district, including Ecosystem services

• Other authorities EIP, Court judgments

What SLP content has changed and what has not

• Very similar to 2011 Draft Core Strategy (PPAP) • Maintaining the fundamental aim of the Green Belt in keeping land permanently open, by not developing

on green field Green Belt land.

• Prioritising opportunities to maximise the economic, environmental and social benefits of sustainable development.

• Policies inc. The Spatial Strategy, Metropolitan Green Belt, Historic Environment and Townscape Character, Urban Design, Retail, Economic Development…Delivery of Infrastructure

• Housing Target/Requirement 250 p.a. – Lower than RSS 360 p.a.

• 40% Affordable Housing – threshold reduced from 15 to 1

• 3 Mixed Use Broad Locations – Harperbury Hospital/Kingsley Green, BRE, Oaklands

• Local Economy - local employers and entrepreneurs - St Albans is a good place to locate business and to do business - vital role that quality of life factors play in supporting the local intellectual capital economy

• Retail – including redevelopment of Ridgeview

Ramifications of not moving forward • GB protection, Appeals and funding for Infrastructure delivery

• RSS going, likely spring 2013 - no housing target – significant risks – potential scale of GB green field – context of (contested) DCLG projections 688

• e.g. 1.5x King Harry Lane or Over 20 football pitches every year on GB green field e.g. More than larger versions of all 8 “Areas of Search” together

• Section 106 and Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) – changes post April 2014

• No adopted SLP, no CIL and radically reduced Sec 106. A large proportion of recent circa £1m Sec 106 per annum at risk – over £10m over plan period

• Over the last six years, the Council have listened to residents and stakeholders. It is likely that very large parts of the SLP will be very widely supported, but some aspects will not be supported by all. It is vital to bear in mind that fundamentally the SLP needs to be considered as a whole.

The evidence base and its interpretation

• A local planning authority should submit a plan for examination which it considers is “sound”

• SLP tested at EIP - in accordance with the Duty to Cooperate, legal and procedural requirements, and whether it is “sound”.

• “Soundness” - Positively prepared, Justified, Effective, Consistent with national policy

• Evidence Base …based on adequate, up-to-date and relevant evidence about the economic, social and environmental characteristics and prospects of the area…

Mixed Use Broad Locations• Harperbury/Kingsley Green Objective• To provide an exemplar mixed use development that integrates the mental health and

learning disabled communities with the wider population• At the same time bring into beneficial use large scale redundant buildings in the Green Belt

• Oaklands Objective• To provide an exemplar mixed use development that enables the College to deliver a step

change in its quality of facilities and an outstanding offer of education and training for all• At the same time provides community use and sports facilities, with significantly improved

public access to the countryside, to further integrate the College with the wider community

• BRE Objective• To provide an exemplar mixed use development that enables the BRE to provide high quality,

high skill local employment for world leading sustainability and green technology companies at the BRE

• The final overall built development will be equivalent to the existing built footprint only, with an increase in public open space and the strategic Green Belt gap between Bricket Wood and Watford/Garston being retained and strengthened

Constraints, including on SLP content and format

• NPPF and Independent EIP – Inspector’s role relates to Duty to Cooperate, legal and procedural requirements, and whether it is sound

• Format for pre-submission publication and responses prescribed by Regulations

• All significant elements need to have been consulted upon and subject to Sustainability Appraisal/SEA – as part of the interlinked whole

• Certain prescribed elements – eg housing target

Comments on emphasis, clarity and issues arising

• To [email protected]

• Or Spatial Planning Team, Civic Centre, St Peters Street, St Albans, Hertfordshire, AL1 3JE

• Pre-submission publication circa 20 December, for 6-8 weeks