Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Warrington Borough CouncilLocal Plan
Strategic Housing Land Availability AssessmentJuly 2017
1 Introduction and Policy Background
1.1 This report presents the findings from Warrington's 2017 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA). It has been prepared from a base date of 1st April 2017. The 2017 SHLAA comprehensively updates the previous 2015 assessment by reviewing the status and conclusions previously reached for sites already within the SHLAA process and assessing new sites which have emerged.
1.2 It is a key component of the evidence base to support the delivery of sufficient land for housing; to meet the borough’s need for more homes; and to inform housing policies within the Warrington Local Plan Review.
1.3 The 2017 SHLAA report is structured around the following sections:
Introduction and background ‐ Identifies what the SHLAA is and why it hasbeen prepared.
Assessment methodology ‐ Explains the methodology which has guided theassessment, including the assumptions which have been applied as part ofindividual site assessments.
Assessment findings ‐ Presents the core outputs and wider findings from theassessment.
Conclusions – Sets out the conclusions arising from the study including anypolicy implications and next steps.
Individual site pro‐formas ‐ Identify the relevant detail of assessments on asite by site basis.
Appendices ‐ supplementary information and supporting evidence ofrelevance to the report.
Policy Background 1.4 The 2017 SHLAA has been prepared in accordance with the National Planning Policy
Framework (NPPF) and Planning Practice Guidance (launched on 6 March 2014 with subsequent updates).
1.5 The NPPF requires local planning authorities to ensure that their Local Plan is based on adequate, up‐to‐date and relevant evidence about the economic, social and environmental characteristics and prospects of their area. The NPPF (paragraph 159 specifically) requires that a SHLAA is undertaken by local planning authorities to:
"establish realistic assumptions about the availability, suitability and the likely economic viability of land to meet the identified need for housing over the plan period."
1.6 In addition, paragraph 47 of the NPPF requires local planning authorities to identify and maintain on a rolling programme a minimum five year supply of deliverable
land1 for housing and to identify sufficient developable land2 for housing for at least a further 5 and preferably 10 years from the date of adoption of Local Plans and to use this evidence to ensure that their Local Plan meet the full, objectively assessed needs (OAN) for market and affordable housing in the housing market area (HMA).
1.7 With regards to the deliverable supply the NPPF requires local planning authorities
to demonstrate an additional buffer of 5% (moved forward from later in the plan period) to ensure choice and competition in the market for land, or 20% where there has been a record of persistent under delivery of housing. The NPPF makes clear that the required way of demonstrating that these requirements can be met is through the process of the SHLAA.
1.8 The purpose of the SHLAA therefore, is to understand the level of housing potential within the Borough and to identify sites which are considered to be suitable for housing and likely to be developed. Its primary role is to:
Identify sites with potential for housing;
Assess their suitability for housing;
Identify any constraints to development; and
Conclude whether suitable sites are deliverable and available for allocation if needed.
1.9 The SHLAA informs on the “deliverable” and “developable” aspects of specific sites
by providing information and an evidence base. It must be noted that the SHLAA does not allocate sites, that role is filled by the Local Plan. Its purpose is instead to collect and collate information that provides a snapshot of each site’s development potential.
Disclaimer
The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment provides evidence, alongside
other studies, to inform the allocation of land through the Local Plan. It assesses
whether sites are suitable for housing, provided they are not required for other
purposes, in order to meet plan targets. It identifies constraints to development and
considers how they might be overcome.
The inclusion of a particular site in the assessment should not, therefore, be taken as
an indication that it will be allocated or granted planning permission for housing or
any other form of development.
1 To be considered deliverable, sites should be available now, offer a suitable location for development now and be achievable with a
realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years and in particular that development of the site is viable. Sites with planning permission should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that schemes will not be implemented within five years, for example they will not be viable, there is no longer a demand for the type of units or sites have long term phasing plans. (definition taken from the NPPF) 2 To be considered developable, sites should be in a suitable location for housing development, and there should be a reasonable prospect that the site is available and could be viably developed at the point envisaged.
2 Assessment Methodology
2.1. Planning Practice Guidance identifies a number of standard outputs that should emerge from the assessment process in the interest of consistency, accessibility and transparency as follows:
a list of all sites or broad locations considered, cross‐referenced to their locations on maps;
an assessment of each site or broad location, in terms of its suitability for development, availability and achievability including whether the site/broad location is viable) to determine whether a site is realistically expected to be developed and when;
contain more detail for those sites which are considered to be realistic candidates for development, where others have been discounted for clearly evidenced and justified reasons;
the potential type and quantity of development that could be delivered on each site/broad location, including a reasonable estimate of build out rates, setting out how any barriers to delivery could be overcome and when;
an indicative trajectory of anticipated development and consideration of associated risks.
2.2. The structure of the 2017 SHLAA report (as set out at paragraph 1.3) has been
prepared to ensure that the required outputs are included and is informed by the process within Planning Practice Guidance as set out on the following page (Fig 2.1).
Figure 2.1: SHLAA Process (taken from the Planning Practice Guidance)
Stage 1: Identification of broad location and sites
Determining the Assessment Area 2.3. The Planning Practice Guidance3 recommends that the area selected for assessment
should be set at the sub‐regional housing market area (HMA) level. 2.4. Warrington, Halton and St.Helens Councils are located in the Mid‐Mersey (or
"Eastern") Housing Market Area (HMA), as originally identified by the 2007 Liverpool City Region Housing Strategy. Between July 2008 and March 2011, the three authorities were part of the Mid‐Mersey Growth Point which aimed to increase the delivery of housing in the sub‐region. The authorities developed a joint agreed approach to their housing evidence base including each authority’s SHLAA. The three authorities have agreed to continue joint working to provide a Growth Point legacy to be reflected in their respective Local Plans.
2.5. In 2015 the Council, in partnership with Halton and St Helens Councils,
commissioned GL Hearn to prepare a Mid‐Mersey Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA), which was published in January 2016. The SHMA reaffirmed that the Mid‐Mersey was still the appropriate geography (Housing Market Area ‐ HMA) upon which to assess housing need.
2.6. Whilst, each authority produces an independent SHLAA report, they resolved to
observe a number of key principles. It was accepted that variations would occur in the detail to which each authority would work, however, each made a commitment to ensure close liaison on evolving work programmes to ensure continuity. Each authority has also committed to ensuring that the results of their individual assessment are capable of aggregation to the sub‐regional ‘Mid Mersey’ level. This SHLAA, therefore, covers the borough of Warrington only. Stakeholder Engagement
2.7.1 From the outset each of the Mid‐Mersey authorities has been committed to ensuring that their SHLAAs have developed in partnership with the development industry and stakeholders of relevance.
2.8 Through recognition that developer activity is rarely confined to administrative
boundaries, Warrington, Halton and St. Helens, despite opting to produce independent SHLAAs, were in agreement that it was logical to establish a single, stakeholder group on a 'Mid Mersey' geographical basis. In addition, to representing a more logical and efficient use of stakeholders time, it was considered that this approach would also help to ensure a degree of consistency exists between the assumptions underpinning each respective authority's SHLAA.
2.9 The last stakeholder meeting was held on the 14 August 2014. In addition,
comments made in relation to the Council’s assessment of housing land supply as
3 The Planning Practice Guidance (CLG), Housing and economic land availability assessment, Paragraph: 007 Reference ID: 3‐007‐20140306.
part of the Regulation 18 consultation exercise on the Scope of the Local Plan Review in Oct 2016 have also been taken into consideration.
Further information on the Halton SHLAA is available here: http://www4.halton.gov.uk/Pages/planning/policyguidance/Strategic‐Housing‐Land‐Availability‐Assessment‐%28SHLAA%29.aspx Further information on the St.Helens SHLAA is available here: http://www.sthelens.gov.uk/what‐we‐do/planning‐and‐building‐control/planning‐policy/strategic‐housing‐land‐availability‐assessment/
Determining sites to be included in the Assessment
Site Size 2.10 The 2017 SHLAA format has been revised so the assessment takes account of the
recommendations contained in the National Planning Practice Guidance (PPG). The PPG recommends that all sites and broad locations capable of delivering five or more dwellings should be considered; and where appropriate alternative size thresholds can be considered (Paragraph: 010 Reference ID: 3‐010‐20140306).
2.11 The Council has chosen to use an alternative size threshold that corresponds with
that used by St Helens Council in their 2016 SHLAA update, so as to ensure consistence with data across the Housing Market Area. Hence, a physical site size threshold of less than 0.25 hectares has been applied to help facilitate the identification of sites. This has been chosen because it does not make assumptions about the density or development typology of a site prior to including the site in the assessment. This also reflects the suggestions in the “Technical consultation on implementation of planning changes”4 published by DCLG in February 2016, on the approach to maintaining a brownfield land register, which indicates that a threshold of 0.25 hectares is appropriate.
Identification of Sites
2.12 Sites contained in previous versions of the SHLAA (2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2015) that have not been developed have been included within this year’s site assessment exercise, applying the new site size threshold of 0.25 ha as detailed above, to sift out these ‘small sites’. Following on from this, an allowance has been made for residential units delivered on small sites below the threshold of 0.25ha. More detail on this is included later in this report.
4 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/systems/uploads/attachment_data/file/507019/160310_planning_consultation.pdf.
2.13 A “Call for Sites” exercise was also undertaken as part of the Regulation 18 consultation exercise on the Scope of the Local Plan Review in Oct 2016 to identify sites.
2.14 In addition to direct nominations, an assessment was undertaken of those sites
already in the planning process including:
Planning permissions for residential developments that are under construction
Unimplemented planning permissions for residential development
Those sites currently subject to, or with a known history of, pre‐application discussions for residential development
Land allocated for employment or other land uses which are no longer required for those uses
2.15 The below sources have been used to identify further sites for inclusion within and
assessment through the SHLAA process:
Sites that have previously benefited from a planning permission but which has since expired
Known vacant and derelict land including those sites on the National Land Use Database
Surplus public sector land
Vacant buildings suitable for conversion
Land in non‐residential use which may have redevelopment potential
Under used garage blocks in residential areas
Large scale redevelopment opportunities arising from the Council's Regeneration Framework and associated masterplans
Sites identified from visual surveys/site visits and local knowledge
2.16 Each site identified has been individually mapped and assigned a unique reference number as part of the recording process and is used in the preparation of the individual site pro‐formas in Appendix 1. Those rolled forward from the 2016 assessment have retained their previous unique reference number for continuity. Site Surveys
2.17 The site survey process was carried out in line with the advice provided in the PPG, checking the following site characteristics:
Site size, boundaries and location;
Current land use and character;
Land uses and character of surrounding area;
Physical constraints (eg access, contamination, steep slopes, flooding, natural features of significance, location of infrastructure and utilities);
Potential environmental constraints;
Where relevant, development progress (eg ground works complete, number of units started, number of units completed); and
An initial assessment of whether the site is suitable for a particular type of use or as part of a mixed–use development.
2.18 In addition, sites were screened for policy constraints that might preclude
development. This is undertaken through an initial assessment of suitability against national policies and local policies / designations to establish only the sites which have reasonable potential for development and produced a reduced list of sites to be taken forward in the assessment and be subject to more detailed site assessment.
2.19 This initial assessment of policy constraints identified a significant group of sites which are located within the Green Belt and are not based on the principle of converting an existing building(s), or other form of 'appropriate' development, have severely restricted development potential in current circumstances. This is taking account of Planning Practice Guidance5 which makes clear that in decision making:
“unmet housing need (including for traveller sites) is unlikely to outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and other harm to constitute the “very special circumstances” justifying inappropriate development on a site within the Green Belt”.
2.20 As a consequence the Council considers that the assessment review process within the SHLAA cannot reasonably conclude that policy constraints relating to the Green Belt can be overcome on a site by site basis. In such circumstances, it is considered premature for the SHLAA to endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in advance of a comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt as part of the review of the Local Plan.
2.21 146 sites located within the Green Belt have therefore been recorded as unsuitable
within the assessment and categorised as constrained for the purpose of identifying a supply of deliverable or developable sites for residential development. The only exception to this is those sites that are based on the principle of converting an existing building or other form of appropriate development as defined by paragraph 89 of the NPPF and which are over the site size threshold of 0.25 ha.
2.22 In terms of flood risk specifically, the Environment Agency's (EA) national flood zone
mapping was used alongside the following assumptions in terms of development potential:
EA FZ1 ‐ development not constrained
EA FZ2 ‐ development not constrained
EA FZ3 ‐ development potentially constrained by flood risk. 2.23 The full list of sites considered to be constrained and therefore not taken forward to
detailed site assessment, together with the reason for each conclusion at a site level, is provided within Appendix 2.
5 Paragraph: 034 Reference ID: 3‐034‐20141006
Stage 2: Approach to Site Assessments 2.24 The purpose of stage 2 of a SHLAA is to establish whether the identified sites are
“deliverable” or “developable”. The NPPF explains what each of these terms means: “Deliverable sites: should be available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within 5 years and in particular that development of the site is viable. Sites with planning permission should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that schemes will not be implemented within five years, for example they will not be viable, there is no longer a demand for the type of units or sites have long term phasing plans.
To be considered developable, sites should be in a suitable location for housing development and there should be a reasonable prospect that the site is available and could be viably developed at the point envisaged”.
2.25 To inform conclusions on the deliverability/developability of sites (established as
having reasonable potential for development at Stage 1), to ensure that all sites were assessed on a consistent basis, information has been recorded within a spreadsheet and then summarised on a standard proforma for each site (see Appendix 1). The information contained in the spreadsheet has been guided by the Planning Practice Guidance and is broadly consistent with previous SHLAAs.
2.26 The information within the individual site assessments has been used to establish
the development potential of each site. The individual assumptions used for assessing whether a site is “deliverable” or “developable” are outline below.
Estimating Development Potential 2.27 In view of the Stage 1 assessment, whilst in Warrington all of the Borough is initially
within the remit of the SHLAA assessment in relation to the identification and recording of sites, the focus of detailed site assessment is upon:
Sites within the settlement boundary of the town of Warrington.
Sites within inset or Green Belt village boundaries as defined within the Local Plan Core Strategy.
Sites within the Green Belt which propose the conversion of existing buildings or other form of appropriate development as defined by paragraph 89 of the NPPF.
Assessing Suitability 2.28 When assessing sites suitability for residential development the following factors
have been considered:
Is the site subject to any development plan designations and if so can these be mitigated?
Is development likely to be precluded by land contamination or poor ground conditions?
Is development likely to be precluded by flood risk or by increasing the risk of flooding elsewhere?
Whether the site be safely and conveniently accessed?
Whether surrounding land uses preclude residential development?
Whether the site is within a hazardous installation or statutory consultation zone?
Whether the site be developed without a detrimental impact on the amenity of adjacent occupiers and to ensure a sufficient level of amenity for potential occupiers?
Whether the site can be considered sustainable in locational terms by way of easy and convenient access to essential facilities and services by means other than the private car?
Suitability Assumptions
2.29 When assessing suitability a number of assumptions have had to be made for some of the criteria employed, these include:
Allocated or committed employment land ‐ Where a site within the SHLAA is located within a designated employment area, the site has been recorded as being constrained (except where residential would contribute to a regeneration priority) i.e. by virtue of the designation there is a presumption against non‐employment related uses at the current time at least whilst the designation remains. Where a site currently has an extant consent for employment development but is not within a designated employment area, the key issue is whether the site can be considered available for housing i.e. how likely is it that the employment related approval will be implemented?
Contaminated land and ground conditions ‐ There are numerous examples within the Borough of where the challenge posed by land contamination and/or ground conditions have been successfully overcome in order to facilitate residential development. In contrast there are very few sites where contamination and/or ground conditions have been the sole factor that has prevented residential development. In most cases the key issue is not whether a site can be adequately remediated but instead whether it can be done so viably. It has therefore been assumed, unless information was available to suggest otherwise, that the presence of contamination would not render a site unsuitable.
Flood risk ‐ After the initial assessment at Stage 1 (see paragraph 2.22), in most instances where flood risk is considered to potentially constrain parts of the development, it has been recorded exactly as that i.e. a constraint which influences the assumption on development potential as opposed to necessarily rendering a site unsuitable. This approach is necessary because sites may be capable of overcoming both the sequential and exceptions test required by national planning policy but a cautious approach is required with respect to Flood Zone 3 in particular.
Accessibility ‐ The Council have assessed the sustainability of sites for new residential development based on public transport access to a GP, Primary School, Secondary School, employment areas and major retail centre, which aligns to the monitoring indicator for Local Plan Core Strategy Policy MP1. All sites have been assumed to be within the requisite 30min travel time unless there is specific evidence to the contrary.
2.30 Broader suitability considerations such as amenity, open space, infrastructure,
landscapes, nature conservation, heritage, pollution and hazardous risks are necessarily assessed on a site by site basis as appropriate.
2.31 Where sites have been deemed to be unsuitable a clear explanation has been
offered as to why within the individual pro‐formas.
Assessing Availability 2.32 To be considered 'available' for development the Practice Guidance identifies that a
site should be free of legal or ownership problems. In essence this means there is a willing landowner or developer in control of the site.
2.33 The decision on whether a site was considered available was based on the following
factors:
Whether there was an extant planning consent and if so whether this had been implemented;
Whether the site was in active use;
Whether the site could be developed now; and
Whether the site was free of ownership and tenancy issues 2.34 If a site benefits from a valid planning consent or has been directly nominated by the
land owner or developer in control of the site then it has been assumed, in the absence of anything to suggest otherwise, that the site is available. This assumption is regardless of whether the site is in active use or not unless there was a known tenancy issue. If a site that was being promoted by a land owner or developer was in active use then it has been assumed that the site could not be considered available at this time. In applying these assumptions, the Council has reviewed the planning history of sites in terms of unimplemented permissions and adjusted the conclusion on availability accordingly.
2.35 Whether the site could be developed now or not relates to whether the site is vacant
and if it has been cleared and is free from the need for any further demolition. The Council have taken a lenient approach to this element of the availability assessment using it to inform as opposed to directly dictate a decision on availability. This is through recognition that whilst some sites still require clearance and demolition, this particular stage of the development process can be completed relatively quickly.
2.36 All sites were considered to be free from ownership or tenancy issues unless there was specific evidence/information to the contrary.
2.37 Sites where an extant consent for an alternative land use has been implemented are
evidently no longer available and are therefore recorded as constrained and
excluded from land supply calculations.
2.38 Where it was concluded that sites could not be considered available at this time, consideration was given to the likelihood of the site becoming available within the Plan period. Assessing Achievability
2.39 Practice Guidance advises that a site can be considered achievable where there is a reasonable prospect that housing will be developed on the site at a particular point in time. It identifies that achievability is essentially a judgement about the economic viability of a site, and the capacity of a developer to complete and sell the housing over a certain period. Market, cost and delivery factors are all important considerations when assessing whether a site can be considered achievable.
2.40 The Mid Mersey Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA)(2016) is based on
local research and published data to quantify housing need, demand and an understanding of how the local housing market works. The findings of the SHMA (2016) indicate that there is significant demand for additional homes (both market and affordable) within Warrington, together with an indication of the types and tenures of homes for which there is strong latent demand.
2.41 In assessing whether the demand translates to achievability, the Council published a Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Viability Study (Oct, 2015). This study explored the economic viability of a range of site types across differing locations within the Borough, with the CIL Viability Study utilising assumptions on developable area and density which are consistent with the SHLAA methodology. The findings of this study, together with housing need and demand identified in the 2016 SHMA, have been used to assess site achievability together with consideration of the following factors:
Whether there is active developer interest in the site?
Whether there is known demand for the form of provision approved/proposed?
Whether similar sites have been successfully developed in the preceding years?
Whether there are any known abnormal development costs? 2.42 Warrington has had a consistently strong housing market in recent years, with levels
of housing completions remaining resilient notwithstanding the economic downturn and subsequent recovery since 2008. Monitoring has shown that sites continue to yield completions and that importantly developers continue to commence sites for which they have obtained planning approval.
2.43 The up‐to‐date evidence within the CIL Viability Study suggests that the majority of
residential development in Warrington is viable, including the policy asks within the
Local Plan. Furthermore, the Council and wider Government, continues to assist developers where possible to help ensure housing delivery remains viable and practical in the short term. The flexibility offered by the Council has allowed the negotiation of S106 agreements where appropriate and has offered a number of options for developers, including deferred payment and instalments that help ensure their developments remain achievable in both the short and long term.
2.44 It is the Council's opinion that achievability should take a long‐term view. This is in keeping with Government advice that viability assessments and related work should ignore extremes within the market. Whilst, evidence suggests that some high density apartment schemes could be considered unachievable at present, they may be achievable in the longer term particularly where there is clear evidence of underlying demand. In such a scenario, the critical issue for the assessment is not whether the site is achievable at present but when within the future, if at all, it will become achievable.
2.45 In reaching conclusions on the achievability of sites, the Council consider that historical trend information and development experiences are important. Prior to the development boom which characterised housing development from 2005 onwards, there were several development sites within the Borough which were widely perceived as unattractive/unviable and hence unlikely to be developed. The potential of many of these sites has however been realised and the ability of the development industry to adapt and deliver in the longer term cannot therefore be overlooked.
Overcoming Constraints 2.46 Planning Practice Guidance advises that where it is unknown when a site could be
developed, then it should be regarded as not currently developable. Therefore, where constraints are considered to be severe and there are insufficient assurances to demonstrate if or when they can be overcome, sites have simply been recorded as 'constrained'.
2.47 Where sites have been categorised as 'constrained', the specific constraint(s) and the
action needed to overcome these has been documented. Progress on the resolution of any constraints are recorded on the individual site pro‐formas in Appendix 1.
It should be noted that the onus is on the landowner/developer to demonstrate that any documented site specific constraints can be overcome.
Estimating Potential Yield/Capacity 2.48 The potential number of dwellings that can be delivered on a site is referred to as
the yield/capacity; this is influenced by the site size, the net developable area and the potential density of development. The estimated yield/capacity for a site in the SHLAA is a desk based assumption regarding the potential amount of development
that can be accommodated on a site. However, this is indicative and should not be taken to mean that this is a maximum or minimum figure.
2.49 When assessing the capacity of each site a cautious approach has generally been observed, this is in keeping with both Planning Practice Guidance and the current expectations of stakeholders. To ensure a transparent approach when estimating the development potential of each site, individual assessments include commentary to make clear the rationale behind the assigned capacity.
Developable Area Assumptions
2.50 This adjustment recognises that larger sites will need to provide areas of open space; landscaping; and potentially on‐site infrastructure and therefore have reduced developable areas. Following analysis of evidence presented at Appendix 3, developable area ratios, as set out in Table 2.1 below, have been used. These ratios have been applied where detailed information from a planning permission is not available or no information has been provided by a landowner/developer. In addition, in circumstances where there is specific evidence of constraints on part of the site or where housing would form part of a wider mixed use development, the developable area ratio has been treated as a guide only and has been further reduced as part of the assessment where appropriate.
Net Developable Area Ratios
Site Size Less than 0.4 ha 0.4 ha to 2ha Over 2ha
Gross to Net Ratios
100% 90% 75%
Table 2.1: Net Developable Area ratios for different scales of development Density Assumptions
2.51 The Council does not have specific prescribed densities within policies of the adopted Local Plan Core Strategy. However, evidence and sensitivity testing (see Appendix 3) suggests a density range of between 30 ‐ 50 dwellings per hectare applied to the net developable area of a site is appropriate when estimating capacity for sites without planning permission or where a developer/landowner has not offered specific details. However, as previously agreed with stakeholders, some flexibility is applied dependent on the characteristics of the site and the area where it is located. For example, whether a site is brownfield or greenfield; the surrounding land uses and density of development have been used to inform an assumption about the likely density of development that may be achieved on a site.
Estimating Lead‐in‐times and Completions 2.52 If a site has been considered to be 'Suitable, Available and Achievable' or 'Suitable,
Likely to become Available and Achievable' then it is necessary to assess when the potential of that site will be realised.
2.53 To ensure that the SHLAA assessments are accurate and the resultant findings are robust, the Council invited stakeholders, developers and landowners to comment upon assumptions relating to lead‐in times and build rates as part of the stakeholder event in August 2014 and consultation on the draft site appraisals and methodology in July 2015. Where developers and landowners have provided specific information relating to these matters and other influences such as phasing, this has influenced the development forecast for that particular site.
Lead‐in‐time Assumptions
2.54 The assumptions relating to lead in times (to first completions) are set out in Table 2.2 below:
Lead in Times
Status Sites below 150 dwellings Sites above 150
dwellings
Under construction n/a n/a
Full Permission/Reserved Matters
1.5 years 1.5 years
Outline Permission 2 years 3 years
Sites without Permission 2.5 years 4 years
Table 2.2: Lead in Time assumptions
These assumptions were identified and sensitivity tested through the sample analysis of individual applications from major and local developers set out in Appendix 5. Although the sample size is relatively small and variations in lead‐in times for sites of all sizes are evident, a specific trend was identified that the period of time to completion of the first dwelling is notably longer for sites in excess of 150 dwellings but only in circumstances where outline permission has been granted or permission has yet to be granted. This is reflected accordingly in the Council’s approach to lead in times.
Build Rate Assumptions
2.55 Where there has been an absence of up to date information provided directly from landowners/developers annual build rates informed by the Council’s local evidence (see Appendix 4) has been utilised as set out in Table 2.3 below:
Build Rates
Site Size Less than 50 dwellings
50 to 150 dwellings
More than 150 dwellings
Build Rate (units per year)
20 35 55
Table 2.3: Build Rate assumptions for different site thresholds
2.56 These build rate assumptions are adapted from analysis of average build rates per year and overall between 2003/04 and 2016/17 (see Appendix 4). Each of the build rate categories applied in the SHLAA remain slightly below the respective long term averages. Long term analysis of delivery is considered reasonable to inform the assumptions given the changes in economic conditions experienced, significant variation in site circumstances and the annual differences in sample sizes within each category. In undertaking the analysis on sites of less than 50 dwellings, to prevent the average build rate being suppressed through delivery of small individual site capacities in less than a year, all sites with a capacity of below 20 dwellings were removed.
Stage 3: Windfall Assessment and “Small Sites” Allowance 2.57 The NPPF permits local planning authorities to make an allowance for windfall sites
within the five‐year supply if there is compelling evidence that such sites have consistently become available in the local area and will continue to provide a reliable source of supply. There is no published guidance on how such an allowance should be calculated, therefore, it is up to individual local planning authorities’ discretion as to how it should be calculated.
2.58 In addition, the Planning Practice Guidance reiterates that a windfall allowance may
be justified within the five year supply but also indicates that local planning authorities could include a windfall allowance, based on a geographical area (using the same criteria as set out in paragraph 48 of the National Planning Policy Framework), for years 6‐15 of the supply (Footnote: Paragraph: 24, Ref ID: 3‐24‐20140306).
2.59 The NPPF defines windfall sites as those “which have not been specifically identified
as available in the Local Plan process. They normally comprise previously developed sites that have unexpectedly become available.”
Small Sites Allowance
2.60 Previous iterations of the SHLAA did not utilise a physical size or capacity threshold for the identification of sites, as is now required by Planning Practice Guidance (FOOTNOTE: Paragraph: 010 Reference ID: 3‐010‐20140306) resulting in 537 sites being presented within the previous 2015 report. A revised approach has been applied within this SHLAA to bring it up to date with current practice. To this end, a physical site size threshold of 0.25ha has been adopted (see paragraphs 2.10 to 2.11 for justification) and only sites that meet this threshold have been assessed. For sites below this size, an allowance is made for the delivery of small sites within the housing land supply, based on historic completion information. Historic completion rates for sites below the threshold of 0.25ha are depicted in Table 2.4 below:
Year Total number
of gross completions
Completions on Small Sites
(below 0.25ha)
Completions on Small sites as a % of total completions
Completions on Large Windfall Sites (0.25Ha and above)
2007/2008 1565 207 13.2% 1
2008/2009 633 89 14.1% 0
2009/2010 388 57 14.7% 0
2010/2011 527 42 8.0% 0
2011/2012 600 57 9.5% 3
2012/2013 647 57 8.8% 0
2013/2014 693 117 16.9% 2
2014/2015 687 62 9.0% 0
2015/2016 595 60 10.1% 0
2016/2017 521 117 22.5% 0
Total 6856 865 6
Small sites average completions
87 12.7%
Table 2.4: Summary of annual average small sites completions 2.61 The above data shows that Warrington has a strong record of delivering a substantial
number of dwellings on small sites. This delivery has taken place under varying economic conditions and hence, does not follow any particular trend. Therefore, it is considered reasonable to assume that small sites will continue to be delivered in the borough throughout the plan period and that an average figure for the ten year period should be employed.
2.62 Additional consideration has been given to applying a windfall allowance for ‘large
sites’ above the threshold of 0.25ha, however data for the past ten years has revealed that only half a dozen dwellings on three sites were delivered that were not previously identified within a SHLAA or as an allocation. For this reason, a separate windfall allowance for ‘large sites’ of 0.25ha or above has not been included within this SHLAA.
2.63 The employment of a ‘large sites’ windfall allowance, will be monitored and reviewed at the next update of the SHLAA to ensure that any changes in the delivery of such sites is captured.
Stage 4: Assessment Review 2.64 The purpose of Stage 4 of the SHLAA process is to set out how much housing can be
provided and at what point in the future. Stage 4 of the study is presented in the next section of this report, providing a summary of the findings; including the identification of the Borough’s ‘deliverable’ and ‘developable housing land supply along with an assessment of the associated risks and the local delivery record.
Stage 5: Final Evidence Base 2.65 This report produces a set of standard outputs in line with the Planning Practice
Guidance (Paragraph: 028 Reference ID: 3‐028‐20140306), as detailed previously in paragraph 2.1.
2.66 The conclusions and core outputs are contained in the following sections and the
appendices.
3 Assessment Review 3.1 This section of the report presents the overall findings from the 2017 SHLAA,
including the identification of the Borough’s ‘deliverable’ and ‘developable housing land supply. The site specific details for each “large” site are available in the individual site pro‐formas in Appendix 1 to support these assessment conclusions. In reaching these conclusions, the Council has considered information provided by stakeholders and planning histories of sites, including the presence of previously unimplemented permissions.
Number and Nature of Sites Identified 3.2 A total of 589 sites, were identified and included within the initial SHLAA assessment
process. Of these 266 sites have been removed from the assessment process due to being small sites of less than 0.25ha, leaving a total of 323 large sites, covering approximately 2,474 Hectares. Of those sites, 245 (76%) were rolled forward from the 2016 SHLAA and hence 78 sites are wholly new sites.
3.3 Of the 323 large sites identified, 45 (14%) had a planning approval on the 1st April 2017. 128 (40%) of the 323 sites identified constituted previously developed land (PDL), 176 (54%) were on greenfield land (GF) and 19 (6%) were considered to be part previously developed/part greenfield.
3.4 In terms of achievability, of the 132 sites (38%) considered too be suitable and available (or likely to become available), 45 sites are currently in possession of a planning approval. Out of these sites in possession of planning approval, a total of 11 sites have been implemented and are currently under construction.
Large Sites Discounted from Housing Land Supply as Constrained
3.5 Out of the 323 large sites identified, 220 (68%) were considered to be ‘suitable’ whereas 123 sites (32%) were regarded as unsuitable and are therefore classified as constrained. The main reason for sites being discounted as constrained was because there is some form of policy constraint. Principally this was because sites were located within the Green Belt but also included restrictions due to being employment land, open space or community facilities. Other reasons included issues such as unquantifiable concerns regarding flood risk, ground contamination and impacts on the historic environment.
3.6 55 (17%) sites were considered suitable, but were not currently available. The main reason leading to the conclusion that sites were likely to become available was where they currently represent obvious infill development opportunities in high demand market areas, the town centre and adjacent to or within regeneration areas. Where sites were considered to be not currently available but likely to become available a cautious approach has been taken to forecasting completions with any housing supply necessarily restricted to the developable supply.
Site Type Large Sites Assessed
Small Sites not Assessed
Total Number of Sites
Deliverable 77 119 196
Developable 55 72 127
Constrained 191 75 266
Total 323 266 589
Table 3.1: Number of Deliverable, Developable and Constrained sites
Other Sites Removed from Housing Land Supply 3.7 Housing completions monitoring is now an integral part of the SHLAA process and
the findings from the latest round of completions monitoring is presented later in this report (Appendix 6). As monitoring reveals that sites have been 'built out' in full i.e. have no remaining capacity, such sites will be removed from the SHLAA and hence will not require a detailed assessment. A total of 48 sites, were removed from the SHLAA and not assessed on the basis that they are now complete. A schedule of these completed sites is included as Appendix 6.
Identified Deliverable Supply of Housing Land 3.8 The NPPF defines deliverable land for housing as a site which is available now, offer a
suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years and in particular that development of the site is viable.
3.9 To assess the timescale within which each site is capable of development, the information on suitability availability, achievability and constraints inform the conclusions of whether a site is deliverable and / or developable ‐ see individual site pro‐formas in Appendix 1 for details.
3.10 Out of the 323 sites assessed within the SHLAA, only the sites considered to be suitable, available now and achievable are capable of contributing to the Borough’s ‘deliverable’ supply of housing. Judgements in this respect have been informed by evidence which supports the deliverability of sites including the absence of significant constraints, as set out in Appendix 1 for the individual sites. Where possible this included landowner/developer contact to establish lead in times to commencement of development and build out rates.
3.11 Through identifying those sites likely to deliver dwelling completions within the next five years (2017‐2022), the Borough’s ‘deliverable’ supply of housing land, as at 1st
April 2017, has been calculated and is summarised in Table 3.2 below.
Number of Sites
Area (Ha)
Forecast Completions
17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Total Total as %
PDL 39 123.14 184 141 253 459 355 1392 62.2%
GF 15 125.11 37 87 187 256 247 814 36.4%
PDL/GF
3 2.72 10 5 10 8 0 33 1.5%
Total 57 250.70 231 233 450 723 602 2239 100%
Table 3.2: Deliverable supply of housing land (All Sites) 3.12 An additional differentiation between those sites with and without planning
permission is provided below in Tables 3.3 and 3.4 for information. Although a site having planning permission is not a pre‐requisite of being ‘deliverable’ it does imply a greater certainty that development will take place unless there is clear evidence schemes will not be implemented within five years.
Number of Sites
Area (Ha)
Forecast Completions
17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Total Total as %
PDL 29 98.69 167 112 198 352 265 1094 76.3%
GF 8 19.73 37 43 54 90 82 306 21.4%
PDL/GF
3 2.72 10 5 10 8 0 33 2.3%
Total 40 121.14 214 160 262 450 347 1433 100%
Table 3.3: Deliverable supply of housing land (Sites with planning permission)
Number of Sites
Area (Ha)
Forecast Completions
17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Total Total as %
PDL 10 24.18 17 29 55 107 90 298 37.0%
GF 7 105.38 0 44 133 166 165 508 63.0%
PDL/GF
0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Total 17 129.56 17 73 188 273 255 806 100%
Table 3.4: Deliverable supply of housing land (Sites without planning permission)
Identified Developable Supply of Housing Land 3.13 The NPPF defines 'developable' land for housing as a site in a suitable location for
housing development with a reasonable prospect that the site is available for, and could be viably developed at the point envisaged.
3.14 Out of the 323 sites assessed within the SHLAA only those sites concluded as being
'suitable, available and achievable' and 'suitable, likely to become available and
achievable' are capable of contributing to the Borough's developable supply of housing.
3.15 The NPPF requires local planning authorities to identify specific developable sites or broad locations for years 6‐10 and where possible, for years 11‐15. Through identifying those sites likely to deliver dwelling completions within the next 6‐15 years, the Borough's 'developable' supply of housing land, as at the 1st April 2017, has been calculated in Tables 3.5 and 3.6 below.
Number of Sites
Area (Ha)
Forecast Completions
22/23
23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 Total Total as %
PDL 37 114.85 387 524 658 481 311 2361 64.3%
GF 12 116.12 263 247 255 238 198 1201 32.7%
PDL/ GF
3 5.72 67 35 8 0 0 110 3.0%
Total 52 236.69 717 806 921 719 509 3672 100%
Table 3.5: Developable supply of housing land (6‐10 year period)
Number of Sites
Area (Ha)
Forecast Completions
27/28 28/29 29/30 30/31 31/32 Total Total as %
PDL 30 136.13 259 407 663 345 126 1800 71.9%
GF 4 83.06 175 145 157 124 75 676 27.0%
PDL/ GF
3 6.99 0 4 25 0 0 29 1.1%
Total 37 226.18 434 556 845 469 201 2505 100%
Table 3.6: Developable supply of housing land (11‐15 year period) 3.16 Individual site pro‐formas in Appendix 1 provide specific details for each of these
sites.
Overall Housing Land Supply (including Small Sites Allowance) 3.17 The deliverable (years 0‐5) and developable (years 6‐15) housing land supply is
comprised of large sites (0.25ha >) with planning permission, SHLAA sites that are suitable for housing and an allowance for small sites (<0.25ha).
3.18 Sites that have an extant consent but have stalled or where consent has expired have been re‐assessed in terms of their suitability for housing and where they still have potential to deliver dwellings have been pushed back from the short term supply into the longer term ‘developable’ supply period (6‐15 years).
3.19 This site sifting exercise and re‐assessment of stalled sites means that the large sites with planning permission that are included in the short to mid‐term (0‐5 years and 6‐10 years) outstanding capacity have a high degree of certainty of coming forward. As
has the Small Sites Allowance, which is based on historic completions data. This sifting and re‐assessment exercise provides confidence in the data used for the supply position and as a result there is no need to include an additional ‘lapse’ or non‐delivery rate.
Housing Land Supply
Period Composition of sites Number of dwellings
Deliverable 0‐5 years
Large sites – with planning permission 1433
Large sites – without planning permission 806
Small sites ‐ allowance (87 x 5) 435
Sub total 2674
Developable 6‐10 years
Large sites – with planning permission 885
Large sites ‐ without planning permission 2,787
Small sites ‐ allowance (87 x 5) 435
Sub total 4107
Developable 11‐15 years
Large sites – with planning permission 272
Large sites ‐ without planning permission 2233
Small sites ‐ allowance (87 x 5) 435
Sub total 2940
Total 9721
Table 3.7: Deliverable and developable housing land supply over the next 15 years
An Indicative Trajectory 3.20 The information from the previous tables has been used to produce an indicative
trajectory of forecast delivery in Figure 1 on the following page. This illustrates on an annual basis how much housing can be provided and at what point in the future.
214160
262
450
347 318
175138 133 121 98 98 76
0 0
1773
188
273
255
399631
783
586
388
336
458
769
469
201
87 87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
318 320
537
810
689
804
893
1008
806
596
521
643
932
556
288
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32
Small Sites Allowance (Sites under 0.25Ha)
SHLAA Sites over 0.25Ha (without Planning Permission)
SHLAA Sites over 0.25Ha (with Planning Permission)
Figure 1: SHLAA 2017 – Indicative Trajectory
Risk Assessment Review of Past Projections
3.21 The planning practice guidance (Paragraph: 025 Reference ID: 3‐025‐20140306) advises that a risk assessment should be made as to whether sites will come forward as anticipated. This 2017 report represents the Council’s sixth comprehensive SHLAA. Given the importance of seeking to predict as accurately as possible future rates of delivery, a review of past projections has been undertaken in order to establish the degree of confidence of future projections and hence confidence with regards to the latest land supply assessments and trajectories.
3.22 The table below illustrates that the accuracy of previous projections is very high.
Detailed analysis that compares actual completions with anticipated completions, concludes that actual completions were occurring on the sites where they were expected to.
Year Projected Actual Balance
2009/10 306 388 +82
2010/11 435 527 +92
2011/12 563 600 +17
2012/13 643 647 +4
2013/14 578* 693 +115
2014/15 612* 687 +75
2015/16 458 595 +137
2016/17 366 492 +126
Table 3.8: Review of SHLAA projected/actual (Net) completions *Projected figures based on those from 2012/13 SHLAA, as a SHLAA report was not produced in 2013 or 2014 (due to EIP of LPCS and subsequent High Court Challenge).
3.23 The fact that projections have continually been exceeded serves to demonstrate the
cautious approach within the SHLAA, which is entirely in keeping with the approach requested by stakeholders. In this regard the SHLAA represents the minimum forward land supply which trend information supports is likely to be exceeded. The accuracy of past projections will be kept under review to ensure that future assessments continue to provide an accurate prediction of future supply. Demolitions/Losses
3.24 No additional allowance has been made for losses through demolition or conversions. This is because the figures for each SHLAA site’s anticipated yield are estimated on a net basis rather than a gross basis within this report. In simple terms, if a single house is demolished to make way for 10 new apartments, then the SHLAA records the estimated yield for the site as being 9 units.
‘Small sites’ allowance
3.25 Paragraphs 2.57 to 2.63 of this report provides evidence to demonstrate that Warrington has a source of ‘small sites’ that can be considered deliverable on a regular basis. Therefore, a ‘small sites’ allowance of 87 dwellings per annum has been included within the housing supply.
3.26 This figure will be monitored and updated, if necessary, in future years to reflect the
observed number of completions from small sites.
Continuity of the forward land supply 3.27 The 2012 SHLAA represented the Council’s fourth successive SHLAA. As such it has
been possible to begin to analyse the continuity of the anticipated forward land supply.
3.28 Table 3.9, below, shows that across the first four annual assessments the projected
forward land supply was relatively stable. When actual completions have been exceeding projected rates, a reducing residual forward land supply would normally be experienced. This has not been the case in Warrington up to 2012, where the continuity of the forward land supply can be seen as enduring. This owes to a combination of the forward land supply having been continually topped up by an influx of new sites within each of the annual reviews (windfall), schemes securing planning permission at higher densities than envisaged by the SHLAA and sites previously deemed as being suitable but constrained being unlocked.
SHLAA Deliverable (0‐5 Year)
Developable (6‐10 Year)
Developable (11‐15 Year)
Total Del/Dev Supply
2009 2377 1639 1428 5444
2010 2073 1577 1704 5354
2011 2501 1308 1238 5047
2012 2765 1558 1562 5885
No SHLAA produced
2015 3340 3819 2713 9872
2016 3494 3927 2868 10289
2017 2674 4107 2940 9721
Table 3.9: Anticipated forward land supply
3.29 Within the figures for 2009 to 2012 there was no reliance upon any of the key strategic proposals (Omega & Lingley Mere/Waterfront & Arpley Meadows) or other sites that were held back (HCA sites) through the emerging Local Plan Core Strategy. However, from 2015 onwards figures are included for these sites following the successful High Court Legal Challenge to the adopted Warrington Local Plan Core Strategy which subsequently resulted in the housing target being removed from the plan. Some of the figures for these sites are estimated whilst others are based on planning permissions that have been granted recently. It is important to note that since the inclusion of these sites the projected forward land supply has still remained relatively stable.
4 Conclusions
Assessing Housing Land Supply relative to Objectively Assessed Needs 4.1 The SHLAA is a key part of the evidence base for the current Local Plan Review. It
forms part of the urban capacity assessment that has been undertaken to provide a robust understanding of the Borough’s housing capacity, along with the master planning work for the town centre from now until 2032.
4.2 In addition to updating the SHLAA to identify the land available for housing over the
next 15 years the Council commissioned and published a Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA, in order to establish the Objectively Assessed Need (OAN) for housing in Warrington (Mid Mersey SHMA Jan 2016 and Mid Mersey SHMA Update – Warrington Addendum, May 2017)
4.3 The Council will confirm its approach to Warrington’s housing need and target
through the Local Plan Review process.
Monitoring and Review
4.4 The SHLAA will be updated on a regular basis to ensure it remains an effective and up to date evidence base for the future monitoring of housing provision against targets contained within the emerging Local Plan. The proposed updates will not alter the methodology, unless the PPG or NPPF is amended in a way which would require a review of the methodology.
4.5 However, housing completion monitoring will continue to be undertaken on a
quarterly basis in order to ensure that the Council have an up to date record of housing provision even if a SHLAA Report is not produced annually and to ensure that the Council’s Brownfield Land Register can be kept up to date.
Definition of Terms
Annual Monitoring Report (AMR): An annual report submitted to the Government by the Local Planning Authority assessing the progress with and the effectiveness of the Local Planning Framework.
Local Plan Core Strategy (LPCS): The document at the heart of the Local Plan that sets out the long‐term spatial vision for the local planning authority area, the spatial objectives and strategic policies to deliver that vision.
Deliverable land: To be considered deliverable, sites should be available now, offer a suitable location for development now and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years and in particular that development of the site is viable. Sites with planning permission should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that schemes will not be implemented within five years, for example they will not be viable, there is no longer a demand for the type of units or sites have long term phasing plans. (Definition taken from the NPPF).
Developable land: To be considered developable, sites should be in a suitable location for housing development, and there should be a reasonable prospect that the site is available and could be viably developed at the point envisaged. (Definition taken from the NPPF).
Development Plan: This includes adopted Local Plans, neighbourhood plans and the London Plan, and is defined in section 38 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Flood Risk: An expression of the combination of the flood probability or likelihood and the magnitude of the potential consequences of the flood event.
Flood Risk Assessment: A study to assess the risk to an area or site from flooding, now and in the future, and to assess the impact that any changes or development on the site or area will have on flood risk to the site and elsewhere. It may also identify, particularly at more local levels, how to manage those changes to ensure that flood risk is not increased. NPPF technical guidance differentiates between regional, sub‐regional/strategic and site‐specific flood risk assessments.
Green Belt: A designation for land around certain cities and large built‐up areas, which aims to keep this land permanently open or largely undeveloped. The purpose of the Green Belt is to;
check the unrestricted sprawl of large built up areas;
prevent neighbouring towns from merging into one another;
safeguard the countryside from encroachment;
to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and
assist urban regeneration by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.
The boundaries of the Green Belt in Warrington, which is contiguous with the Green Belt in Merseyside, Greater Manchester, and North Cheshire, are shown on the Local Plan Core Strategy Proposals Map.
Greenfield: Land on which no development has previously taken place unless the previous development was for agriculture or forestry purposes or, the remains of any structure or activity have since blended into the landscape.
Local Development Scheme (LDS): The local planning authority’s programme for the preparation of Local Development Documents that must be agreed with Government and reviewed every year.
Local Plan: Documents within the Local Planning Framework that have development plan status. In Warrington, the key document at the heart of the Local Planning Framework is the Local Plan Core Strategy. All Local Plans must be subject to rigorous procedures of community involvement, consultation and independent examination, and adopted after receipt of the inspector’s binding report. Once adopted, development management decisions must be made in accordance with them unless material considerations indicate otherwise.
Local Planning Framework: This is a non‐statutory term used to describe a set of documents, which includes all the local planning authority’s Local Plans. A Local Planning Framework is comprised of:
• Local Plans (which form part of the statutory development plan)
• Supplementary Planning Documents
The Local Planning Framework will also comprise of other local development documents:
• the Statement of Community Involvement
• the Local Development Scheme
• the Annual Monitoring Report
National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF): The NPPF came into effect in March 2012 and sets out the Government’s requirements for the planning system in the form of a statement of national policy which aims to achieve sustainable development through the preparation of local plans and the management of development proposals by local planning authorities. The NPPF replaces all previously published Planning Policy Guidance notes (PPGs) and Planning Policy Statements (PPSs) except for PPS10 (Sustainable Waste Management) which is still relevant until replaced in due course by a National Waste Plan.
Open Space: All open space of public value, including not just land, but also areas of water (such as rivers, canals, lakes and reservoirs) which offer important opportunities for sport and recreation and can act as a visual amenity.
Planning Policy Statement (PPS): Issued by central Government to provide national policy advice on thematic subject areas. Now largely replaced by the NPPF.
Previously Developed Land (PDL): Land which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land (although it should not be assumed that the whole of the curtilage should be developed) and any associated fixed surface infrastructure. This excludes: land that is or has been occupied by agricultural or forestry buildings; land
that has been developed for minerals extraction or waste disposal by landfill purposes where provision for restoration has been made through development control procedures; land in built‐up areas such as private residential gardens, parks, recreation grounds and allotments; and land that was previously‐developed but where the remains of the permanent structure or fixed surface structure have blended into the landscape in the process of time (definition taken from the NPPF).
Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS): Part of the Development Plan. Identifies the scale and distribution of new housing in the region, indicates areas for regeneration, expansion or sub‐regional planning and specifies priorities for the environment, transport, infrastructure, economic development, agriculture, minerals and waste treatment and disposal. Prepared by Regional Planning Bodies.
Statement of Community Involvement (SCI): sets out the standards to be achieved by the local authority in involving local communities in the preparation, alteration and continual review of Local Development Documents and development control decisions.
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA): Part of the Local Planning Framework evidence base. A detailed and robust assessment of the extent and nature of the risk of flooding in an area and its implications for land use planning. Can set the criteria for the submission of planning applications in the future and for guiding subsequent development control decisions.
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA): Part of the Local Planning Framework evidence base. The document looks to identify sites with potential for housing, assess their potential and assess whether they are likely to be developed in order to identify a five, ten and fifteen year supply of housing for an area.
Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA): Part of the Local Planning Framework evidence base. The document estimates need and demand for affordable and market housing and assesses how this varies across the study area. The document also considers future demographic trends and resulting housing requirements.
Unitary Development Plan (UDP): An old‐style development plan prepared by a Metropolitan District and some Unitary Local Authorities. These plans will continue to operate for a time after the commencement of the new development plan system introduced by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, by virtue of specific transitional provisions.
Appendices
Appendix 1 Site Proformas
Appendix 2 Constrained Sites List
Appendix 3 Density and Net Developable Area Testing
Appendix 4 Build Rates Analysis
Appendix 5 Sample Site Lead‐In Times
Appendix 6 Housing Completions 2016‐2017
Appendix 1 - Site Proformas
SHLAA Reference ‐ 308
2018/19: 27
2020/21: 55
2023/24: 55
2025/26: 13
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at Appleton Cross
Site Address: Off Dipping Brook Avenue
Ward: Grappenhall
Existing Use: Agricultural
Gross Site Area (Ha): 22 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 14
Planning Permission History: 2017/29930
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: Yes ‐ Capable of being resolved
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: The site is considered suitable, available and achievable and whilst it does not currently benefit from a detailed
planning approval for residential development it does benefit from New Town 7(1) status and has recently been subject to an outline
planning application (2017/29930). The site is therefore considered to be deliverable in the short (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 370
Residual Net Capacity: 370
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 192
2017/18:
2019/20: 55
2021/22: 55
Developable 2022‐2027: 178
2022/23: 55
2024/25: 55
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1029
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 20
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at John St/Winwick Street
Site Address: Land at John St/Winwick Street, Warrington
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Vacant Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.84 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.756
Planning Permission History: 2007/09937
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: n/a
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however within an area (the stadium quarter) being promoted for development by the Council
and is therefore considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 42
Residual Net Capacity: 42
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 42
2022/23: 10
2024/25: 12
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1058
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Sewage Works
Site Address: Sewage Works off, Reddish Lane, Lymm
Ward: Lymm North & Thelwall
Existing Use: Defunct sewage works
Gross Site Area (Ha): 2.4 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 2.4
Planning Permission History: 2012/21055
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: n/a
Ground Conditions Issues: n/a
Site Access Issues: n/a
Surrounding Land Issues: n/a
Infrastructure Issues: n/a
Hazardous Installations Issues: n/a
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 1
2017/18: 1
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1090
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 40
2025/26: 38
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Beers Building Co
Site Address: Station Road, Latchford, WA4 2AD
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: Derelict site
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.75 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.575
Planning Permission History: (previous consents) 2008/12523, 2008/12578 and 2011/18363
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however being actively promoted as a development opportunity and is in a relatively high demand
market area. On this basis the site is therefore considered to be developable (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 158
Residual Net Capacity: 158
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 158
2022/23: 40
2024/25: 40
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1091
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Manchester Ship Canal
Site Address: Mineral Railway, Thelwall Lane, Latchford
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: Largely complete residential estate.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 2.54 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 2.54
Planning Permission History: 2006/08928
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: n/a
Ground Conditions Issues: n/a
Site Access Issues: n/a
Surrounding Land Issues: n/a
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: N/A
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: n/a
Known Demand for Housing: n/a
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: n/a
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable and available with the remaining capacity, which relates to a single block of
apartments the footings of which have already been constructed, likely to be achievable in the short term. The site is therefore
considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 122
Residual Net Capacity: 24
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 24
2017/18:
2019/20: 24
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1108
2018/19:
2020/21: 17
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Edwards Cheshire
Site Address: Navigation Street, Warrington
Ward: Fairfield & Howley
Existing Use: Vacant Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.57 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.57
Planning Permission History: 2007/10238
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Recent developer interest in the site. No alternative planning application submitted, so extant planning
permission used.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 76
Residual Net Capacity: 76
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 52
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22: 35
Developable 2022‐2027: 24
2022/23: 24
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1178
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 17
2025/26: 35
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Cardinal Newman High School
Site Address: Bridgewater Avenue, Latchford East
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: School Ground
Gross Site Area (Ha): 2.72 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 2.72
Planning Permission History: 2007/12025 and 2010/17569
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Based on previous planning permission although now expired, the site is considered suitable, available and
achievable. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 110
Residual Net Capacity: 110
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 110
2022/23:
2024/25: 35
2026/27: 23
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1201
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: New World Ltd
Site Address: New World House, Thelwall Lane, Warrington, WA4 1NL
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: Residential development site.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 13.9117 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 13.9117
Planning Permission History: 2007/11944 and 2009/14707 and 2010/17050
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: N/A
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: N/A
Active Use: N/A
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: N/A
Known Demand for Housing: N/A
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: N/A
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable and available with the planning permission implemented and the site having already
yielded significant completions to date. The remaining capacity is likely to be realised across the deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 482
Residual Net Capacity: 27
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 27
2017/18: 27
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1245
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: The Corner House
Site Address: 98 Sandy Lane, Warrington, WA2 9HX
Ward: Orford
Existing Use: Vacant Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.83 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.747
Planning Permission History: 2009/15652
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: The site is suitable and available, and due to the small scale nature of the site and pre‐existing land preparation
it is considered to be achievable notwithstanding the recent expiry of planning permission.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 11
Residual Net Capacity: 11
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 11
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22: 11
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1401
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at Winwick Street
Site Address: Tanners Lane, Dallam Lane, Warrington
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Mixed use
Gross Site Area (Ha): 3 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.3
Planning Permission History: 2005/07132
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes ‐ interaction with office and higher education uses surrounding the site.
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable in the medium term with residential development likely to
be brought forward as part of a mixed use scheme. The site is therefore considered to be developable (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 20
Residual Net Capacity: 20
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 20
2022/23: 20
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1412
2018/19: 17
2020/21: 35
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land At Dawson House,
Site Address: Liverpool Road, Great Sankey, Warrington
Ward: Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall
Existing Use: Offices
Gross Site Area (Ha): 5.78 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 5.78
Planning Permission History: 2011/18949 & 2016/23929 & 2016/29330
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable. As site has planning permission, it is considered part
deliverable (0‐5 yrs) and part developable (6‐10 yrs) due to lead in times which reflect that it is not currently under construction.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 147
Residual Net Capacity: 147
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 122
2017/18:
2019/20: 35
2021/22: 35
Developable 2022‐2027: 25
2022/23: 25
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1506
2018/19:
2020/21: 55
2023/24: 110
2025/26: 110
2028/29: 110
2030/31: 110
Site Name: Peel Hall
Site Address: South of the M62 East of the A49
Ward: Poplars & Hulme
Existing Use: Vacant Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 59.45 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 44.5875
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: Yes
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes.
Infrastructure Issues: Yes
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Based on information provided by the landowner / developer, the site is considered to be suitable, available
and achievable and is of a sufficient scale to overcome existing constraints and infrastructure requirements, particularly if
apppropriately phased.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1200
Residual Net Capacity: 1200
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 135
2017/18:
2019/20: 25
2021/22: 55
Developable 2022‐2027: 550
2022/23: 110
2024/25: 110
2026/27: 110
Developable 2027‐2032: 515
2027/28: 110
2029/30: 110
2031/32: 75
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1508
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 2
2030/31:
Site Name: Ramswood Nursery
Site Address: Manchester Rd, WA3 6EA
Ward: Rixton & Woolston
Existing Use: Commercial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.92 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.728
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF/PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes ‐ Further evidence required
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 4
Residual Net Capacity: 2
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 2
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1509
2018/19:
2020/21: 12
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: South Western corner of Penketh Business Park
Site Address: Off Cleveleys Rd, Penketh, Warrington
Ward: Great Sankey South
Existing Use: Commercial and vacant land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.76 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.76
Planning Permission History: 2010/17075
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: Yes
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes ‐ Further evidence required
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however being promoted for development and is expected to obtain planning approval and be
commenced within the deliverable (0‐5) period.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 22
Residual Net Capacity: 22
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 22
2017/18:
2019/20: 10
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1513
2018/19: 5
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Hollingreave Farm
Site Address: Dam Lane, Rixton, WA3 6LE
Ward: Rixton & Woolston
Existing Use: Existing farmhouse and barns.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.45 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.45
Planning Permission History: 2012/20090
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 6
Residual Net Capacity: 5
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 5
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1516
2018/19:
2020/21: 35
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land off Stretton Rd / Arley Rd, Appleton Thorn
Site Address: Land off Stretton Rd / Arley Rd, Appleton Thorn
Ward: Grappenhall
Existing Use: Agricultural
Gross Site Area (Ha): 2.92 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 2.336
Planning Permission History: 2016/29511
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The adopted Local Plan Core Strategy is based on a more proactive, and pragmatic approach to housing land
release, and subject to an appropriate scheme being drawn up and pursued. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5)
rather than deliverable on the basis that it constitutes an obvious infill site in a high demand market area but requires an appropriate
scheme to ensure retention and qualitative improvements to public open space.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 79
Residual Net Capacity: 79
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 79
2017/18:
2019/20: 17
2021/22: 27
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1517
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Ship Inn and adjoining land, Walton
Site Address: Former Ship Inn and adjoining land, Chester Road, Walton, WA4 6EN
Ward: Stockton Heath
Existing Use: Licensed restaurant, landscape maintenance depot and garden centre
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.37 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.37
Planning Permission History: 2014/24980 & 2015/26890
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes ‐ Capable of being resolved
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 14
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 1
2017/18: 1
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1519
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 7
2030/31:
Site Name: Howards Transport Limited
Site Address: Robins Lane, Culcheth, WA3 4AE
Ward: Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft
Existing Use: Commercial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.35 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.35
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 7
Residual Net Capacity: 7
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 7
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1541
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 27
2030/31: 55
Site Name: Arpley Meadows (mid parcel immediately abutting the west coast
mainline)
Site Address: South of WA1 1NA
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Gross Site Area (Ha): 19.57 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 12.9162
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3b
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: Yes
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable and available, but will only be achievable through delivery of infrastructure to
overcome existing constraints (expected by 2025). Residential development is being promoted by the land owner and the Council
through the publication of the Town Centre South Strategic Masterplan Framework Waterfront Final Report. Site to be reviewed on an
annual basis.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 646
Residual Net Capacity: 646
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 192
2027/28:
2029/30: 55
2031/32: 55
2032+: 454
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1560
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Greenscene
Site Address: Burford Lane, Broomedge, Warrington
Ward: Lymm South
Existing Use: Horticulture/Retail
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.39 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.195
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF/PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development nor is a specific proposal being actively promoted at this time. The site is therefore considered to be
developable in the longer term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 2
Residual Net Capacity: 2
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 2
2022/23: 2
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1588
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Heath House, Kenyon Lane, Croft
Site Address: Heath House, Kenyon Lane, Croft, WA3 7DU
Ward: Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft
Existing Use: Residential
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.78 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.702
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development nor is a specific proposal being actively promoted at this time. The site is considered to be developable in the
medium term (6‐10) due to limited activity since its original nomination, but could be brought forward much sooner.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 1
2022/23:
2024/25: 1
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1607
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 10
2030/31:
Site Name: The Old Rectory
Site Address: Rectory Lane, Winwick
Ward: Burtonwood & Winwick
Existing Use: Commercial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.82 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.41
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development nor is the site being actively promoted for a specific development proposal. The site is therefore considered
to be developable in the longer term (11‐15), which is a cautious assessment based on achievability which could occur much sooner.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 14.35
Residual Net Capacity: 14.35
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 14
2027/28:
2029/30: 4
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1613
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Barondale Grange
Site Address: Stockport Road
Ward: Lymm North & Thelwall
Existing Use: Residential
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.86 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.774
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however considered to be deliverable on the basis that the land owner continues to actively
promote this development opportunity in a very strong and high demand market area.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 5
Residual Net Capacity: 4
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 4
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22: 4
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1620
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Recycling premises
Site Address: Off Camsley Lane, Lymm
Ward: Lymm North & Thelwall
Existing Use: Recycling premises
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.9 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.45
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 11
Residual Net Capacity: 11
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 11
2027/28:
2029/30: 11
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1633
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 27
2030/31: 55
Site Name: Arpley Meadows (most western parcel)
Site Address: Arpley Meadows
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Vacant land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 29.46 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 22.095
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: Yes
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: Yes
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: Yes
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained until essential infrastructure is delivered.
Residential development is being promoted by the land owner and the Council through the publication of the Town Centre South
Strategic Masterplan Framework Waterfront Final Report. Infrastructure delivery is anticipated by 2025, thereby suggesting that the
site will be developable thereafter.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1105
Residual Net Capacity: 1105
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 192
2027/28:
2029/30: 55
2031/32: 55
2032+: 913
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1640
2018/19: 17
2020/21: 14
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at Admirals Road, Birchwood
Site Address: Land at Admirals Road, Birchwood
Ward: Birchwood
Existing Use: Open space / site of former school
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.77 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.416
Planning Permission History: 2016/28810
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. However, the site is subject to a planning application and as such it is considered to be deliverable in the
short‐term (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 66
Residual Net Capacity: 66
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 66
2017/18:
2019/20: 35
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1642
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Bewsey Old Hall
Site Address: Bewsey Farm Close, Warrington
Ward: Chapelford & Old Hall
Existing Use: Vacant building and park land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 3.03 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 3.03
Planning Permission History: 2007/10550 and APP/M0655/A/08/2092759/NWF
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF/PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. Given concerns over achievability of apartments in the short‐term however, the site is considered to be
developable in the medium‐term i.e. 6‐10 year period.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 55
Residual Net Capacity: 48
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 48
2022/23: 48
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1643
2018/19: 8
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Bruche former Police Training Centre
Site Address: Off Greenway
Ward: Poulton South
Existing Use: Redundant institution
Gross Site Area (Ha): 8.81 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 8.81
Planning Permission History: 2013/22541
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable. A disposal exercise resulted in significant interest from a
range of developers and as such the site is considered deliverable. Site is under construction.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 220
Residual Net Capacity: 63
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 63
2017/18: 55
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1646
2018/19:
2020/21: 22
2023/24: 55
2025/26: 55
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Grappenhall Heys ‐ Remainder
Site Address: Off Curzon Drive, Grappenhall Heys
Ward: Grappenhall
Existing Use: New Town Reserved Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 19 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 15.8
Planning Permission History: 2017/29929
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: Yes
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: The site is considered suitable, available and achievable and whilst it does not currently benefit from a detailed
planning approval for residential development it does benefit from New Town 7(1) status and has recently been subject to an outline
planning application (2017/29929). The site is therefore considered to be deliverable in the short (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 400
Residual Net Capacity: 400
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 77
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22: 55
Developable 2022‐2027: 275
2022/23: 55
2024/25: 55
2026/27: 55
Developable 2027‐2032: 48
2027/28: 48
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1647
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 18
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land off Mill Lane, Houghton Green
Site Address: Land off Mill Lane, Houghton Green, WA2 0SU
Ward: Poplars & Hulme
Existing Use: Paddocks
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.32 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.528
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: Yes
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however being promoted for development and is therefore considered to be developable (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 18
Residual Net Capacity: 18
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 18
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1650
2018/19:
2020/21: 55
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at Pewterspear Green
Site Address: Off Henbury Gardens, Pewterspear Green
Ward: Appleton
Existing Use: Agricultural
Gross Site Area (Ha): 7.54 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 5.65
Planning Permission History: 2016/28807
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: Yes
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: The site is considered suitable, available and achievable and whilst it does not currently benefit from a detailed
planning approval for residential development it does benefit from New Town 7(1) status and has recently been subject to an outline
planning application (2016/28807). The site is therefore considered to be deliverable in the short (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 180
Residual Net Capacity: 180
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 137
2017/18:
2019/20: 27
2021/22: 55
Developable 2022‐2027: 43
2022/23: 43
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1710
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 17
2025/26: 13
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Dalton Bank Council Depot
Site Address: Manchester Road East
Ward: Fairfield & Howley
Existing Use: Industrial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.45 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.305
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 65
Residual Net Capacity: 65
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 65
2022/23:
2024/25: 35
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1715
2018/19:
2020/21: 27
2023/24: 55
2025/26: 55
2028/29: 55
2030/31:
Site Name: Spectra Building & Drivetime golf range
Site Address: South of Centre Park business park.
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Commercial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 16.65 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 7.14285
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3b
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: Yes
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: Yes ‐ Further evidence required
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable and is likely to become available in the short to medium term now that funding has
been secured for Phase 1 of the Warrington Waterfront Access Strategy with work due to be resolved in 2016/17.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 512
Residual Net Capacity: 512
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 82
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22: 55
Developable 2022‐2027: 275
2022/23: 55
2024/25: 55
2026/27: 55
Developable 2027‐2032: 155
2027/28: 55
2029/30: 45
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1717
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Dairy Works
Site Address: Knutsford Road, Warrington
Ward: Latchford West
Existing Use: Cleared site.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.25 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.25
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to be available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning
approval for residential development. The site is however in a relatively strong market area and there has been recent interest in
similar sites nearby. On this basis the site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium term (years 6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 13
Residual Net Capacity: 13
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 13
2022/23:
2024/25: 13
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1719
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31: 18
Site Name: Furnish with Flair Site
Site Address: Wilderspool Causeway, Warrington
Ward: Latchford West
Existing Use: Retail / commercial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.31 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.31
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable but can not be considered available at this time. However, given that the market is
starting to pick up and that parts of the site remain vacant it is likely that the site will become available in the future. Site to remain
within future reviews and status of existing uses and un‐implemented consents to be monitored.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 36
Residual Net Capacity: 36
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 36
2027/28:
2029/30: 18
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1720
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: MSBS Joinery Site
Site Address: Star Lane, Lymm
Ward: Lymm North & Thelwall
Existing Use: Commercial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.37 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.37
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 11.1
Residual Net Capacity: 11.1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 11
2027/28: 11
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1723
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 11
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at Hopwood Street
Site Address: Hopwood Street, off Manchester Road East
Ward: Fairfield & Howley
Existing Use: Cleared site
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.46 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.414
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: n/a
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 21
Residual Net Capacity: 21
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 21
2022/23:
2024/25: 10
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1724
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land to the rear of the Sportsman Pub ‐ Penketh
Site Address: Warrington Road, Penketh, WA5 2EN
Ward: Penketh & Cuerdley
Existing Use: Beer Garden
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.33 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.33
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable but can not be considered available at this time. However, given that the market is
starting to pick up and that the site does not contain any significant operational development it is likely that the site will become
available in the future.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 12
Residual Net Capacity: 12
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 12
2027/28:
2029/30: 12
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1733
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 10
2030/31: 1
Site Name: Hall Motors Site
Site Address: Folly Lane
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Car showroom / garage
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.85 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.765
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 31
Residual Net Capacity: 31
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 31
2027/28:
2029/30: 20
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1737
2018/19: 10
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land Between Public House and 3 Church Lane
Site Address: Church Lane, Culcheth, WA3 5DL
Ward: Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft
Existing Use: Commercial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.25 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.25
Planning Permission History: 2016/27387
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 10
Residual Net Capacity: 10
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 10
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1740
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 8
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land between 284 ‐ 302 Warrington Road
Site Address: Warrington Road, Glazebury
Ward: Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft
Existing Use: Agricultural
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.26 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.26
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 8
Residual Net Capacity: 8
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 8
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1746
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 35
2030/31:
Site Name: Site of former Kwik Save
Site Address: Academy Way / Buttermarket Street, Warrington, WA1 2BJ
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Leisure related use.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.39 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.39
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15) once short term leases relating to the
existing land use expire.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 50
Residual Net Capacity: 50
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 50
2027/28:
2029/30: 15
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1752
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 35
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Wilderspool Stadium
Site Address: Priory Street
Ward: Latchford West
Existing Use: Former sports stadium
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.9 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.425
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is an area clearly identified for future redevelopment albeit not until the longer term. The site is
therefore considered to be developable (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 71
Residual Net Capacity: 71.25
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 71
2027/28: 17
2029/30: 19
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1753
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31: 18
Site Name: Land at the rear of St. James Court
Site Address: Off Wilderspool Causeway
Ward: Latchford West
Existing Use: Car Park
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.85 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.765
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is an area clearly identified for future redevelopment albeit not until the longer term. The site is
therefore considered to be developable (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 38
Residual Net Capacity: 38.25
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 38
2027/28:
2029/30: 20
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1755
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 25
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Garven Place Clinic
Site Address: Legh Street
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Vacant land. Although current undetermined LDC application
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.56 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.56
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10) given that this locality
continues to be actively promoted and given the priority location in the heart of the Town Centre.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 25
Residual Net Capacity: 25
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 25
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1756
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Pierpoint & Bryant Lagoon
Site Address: Rear of Pichael Nook
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: Derelict land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 3.45 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 3.45
Planning Permission History: 2012/20529
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 104
Residual Net Capacity: 57
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 57
2017/18: 57
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1760
2018/19: 9
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at 3 Delenty Drive
Site Address: Birchwood, WA3 6AN
Ward: Birchwood
Existing Use: Derelict land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.35 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.35
Planning Permission History: 2015/25391
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 9
Residual Net Capacity: 9
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 9
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1762
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 1
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Site of Dog & Partridge
Site Address: off Manchester Road, Woolston, WA1 3TZ
Ward: Poulton South
Existing Use: Public house and grounds.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.57 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.3819
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development nor is a specific proposal being actively promoted at present despite landowner interest. The site is therefore
considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10) due to need for land preparation.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 11
Residual Net Capacity: 11
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 11
2022/23:
2024/25: 10
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1803
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 35
2030/31: 14
Site Name: Land to North of Birchwood Way
Site Address: Land to North of Birchwood Way, Longbarn, Warrington
Ward: Poplars & Hulme
Existing Use: Vacant land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 4.28 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 2.87616
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the latter years of the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 101
Residual Net Capacity: 101
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 101
2027/28: 17
2029/30: 35
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1809
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: 55 ‐ 57 Knutsford Road
Site Address: 55 ‐ 57 Knutsford Road
Ward: Latchford West
Existing Use: Commercial and open space
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.25 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.25
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF/PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is an area clearly identified for future redevelopment albeit not until the longer term. The site is
therefore considered to be developable (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 25
Residual Net Capacity: 25
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 25
2027/28:
2029/30: 25
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1810
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 1
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Greenlea House
Site Address: Delph Lane, Winwick
Ward: Burtonwood & Winwick
Existing Use: Agricultural building
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.5 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.45
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however is considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10) given a specific proposal is
not currently being promoted.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 1
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1825
2018/19: 25
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Gemini 16
Site Address: Carina Park, Westbrook
Ward: Westbrook
Existing Use: New Town Reserved Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 5.4 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 5.4
Planning Permission History: 2014/24762 & 2015/26158
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable. Now benefits from planning permission and therefore is
considered to be deliverable in the short term.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 118
Residual Net Capacity: 60
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 60
2017/18: 35
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1855
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land off Hollow Drive
Site Address: Hollow Drive, Stockton Heath, WA4 2AS
Ward: Stockton Heath
Existing Use: Vacant land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.36 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.36
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is been actively promoted through a planning application (2016/28485) that is currently the subject
of an appeal). The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 5
Residual Net Capacity: 5
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 5
2017/18:
2019/20: 5
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 1885
2018/19: 1
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Dingle Farm
Site Address: Dingle Lane, Appleton, WA4 3HR
Ward: Grappenhall
Existing Use: Agricultural / Commercial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.98 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.98
Planning Permission History: 2015/25077
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0 ‐ 5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 2
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 1
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2036
2018/19:
2020/21: 20
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land Bounded by Montclare Crescent, Brian Avenue & Chester Road,
Stockton Heath, Warrington, WA4 2SA
Site Address: Stockton Heath, Warrington,WA4 2SA
Ward: Stockton Heath
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.53 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.15
Planning Permission History: 2008/13417
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: N/A
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and whilst does not benefit from planning permission is
nevertheless likely to be disposed of and developed in the short‐term. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 51
Residual Net Capacity: 51
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 50
2017/18:
2019/20: 10
2021/22: 20
Developable 2022‐2027: 1
2022/23: 1
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2129
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 10
2025/26: 7
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land off Knutsford Road / Blackbear Bridge
Site Address: Land off Knutsford Road/ Blackbrear Bridge, WA4 1NH
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: Dated commercial premises and underutilised land.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.56 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.504
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however being actively promoted as a development opportunity in a relatively strong market
area. On this basis the site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium‐term (years 6‐10) following cessation of any
remaining commercial leases.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 37
Residual Net Capacity: 37
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 37
2022/23:
2024/25: 20
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2134
2018/19:
2020/21: 60
2023/24: 60
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Lingley Mere Business Park
Site Address: Lingley Mere, Great Sankey, WA5 3LQ
Ward: Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall
Existing Use: Vacant Land (Former Airbase)
Gross Site Area (Ha): 5.7 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 4.28
Planning Permission History: 2016/27313
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0 ‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 275
Residual Net Capacity: 275
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 150
2017/18:
2019/20: 30
2021/22: 60
Developable 2022‐2027: 125
2022/23: 60
2024/25: 5
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2135
2018/19:
2020/21: 135
2023/24: 98
2025/26: 98
2028/29: 98
2030/31:
Site Name: Omega
Site Address: West Side of Burtonwood Road, Warrington, WA5
Ward: Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall
Existing Use: Vacant Land (Former Airbase)
Gross Site Area (Ha): 46 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 34
Planning Permission History: 2015/26469
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0 ‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1100
Residual Net Capacity: 1100
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 338
2017/18:
2019/20: 68
2021/22: 135
Developable 2022‐2027: 490
2022/23: 98
2024/25: 98
2026/27: 98
Developable 2027‐2032: 272
2027/28: 98
2029/30: 76
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2145
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 7
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: St. Margarets Infant Block
Site Address: Sandy Lane, Warrington, WA2 9AD
Ward: Orford
Existing Use: School Building (infant block)
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.5 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.45
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however being promoted as a redevelopment opportunity and as such is considered to be
developable in the medium (6‐10) term.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 17
Residual Net Capacity: 17
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 17
2022/23:
2024/25: 10
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2160
2018/19: 7
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land off Cedarfield Road, Lymm
Site Address: Land off Cedarfield Road, Lymm, WA13 9HN
Ward: Lymm North & Thelwall
Existing Use: Open Space
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.25 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.25
Planning Permission History: 2015/26200
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable, and benefits from a planning approval for residential
development. Site has therefore been included in the 0‐5 year supply.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 7
Residual Net Capacity: 7
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 7
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2163
2018/19: 8
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Oakdene Nursing Home
Site Address: Off Twiss Green Lane, Culcheth, WA3 4TH
Ward: Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft
Existing Use: Vacant premises
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.53 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.477
Planning Permission History: 2016/28534
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable, and benefits from a planning approval for residential
development. Site has therefore been included in the 0‐5 year supply.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 8
Residual Net Capacity: 8
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 8
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2172
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 2
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at Rixton New Hall
Site Address: Manchester Road, Rixton, WA3 6HA
Ward: Rixton & Woolston
Existing Use: Farm buildings and agricultural land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 4.82 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 3.615
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF/PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 2
Residual Net Capacity: 2
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 2
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2176
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 35
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Sycamore Lane Community Primary School
Site Address: Sycamore Lane, Gt Sankey, WA5 1LA
Ward: Great Sankey South
Existing Use: Primary School
Gross Site Area (Ha): 2.3 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.725
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF/PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The future use of the site has not yet been determined. A sufficient lead in time would be required owing to
the required disposal period and subsequent planning stages and it is not therefore envisaged that the site would yield completions
until the medium‐term, developable 6‐10 year period.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 60
Residual Net Capacity: 60
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 60
2022/23: 17
2024/25: 8
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2177
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 10
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Grappenhall Hall Residential School
Site Address: Church Lane, Grappenhall
Ward: Grappenhall
Existing Use: School
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.7 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.85
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 20
Residual Net Capacity: 20
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 20
2022/23:
2024/25: 10
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2179
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 20
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land off Hardy Road
Site Address: Land off Hardy Road, Lymm, WA13 0NX
Ward: Lymm South
Existing Use: Paddocks.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.9 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.425
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: Yes
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however in a strong and high demand market area. Likely that when current policy restrictions are
lifted, formal proposals will be immediately forthcoming and hence the site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium
term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 43
Residual Net Capacity: 43
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 43
2022/23:
2024/25: 10
2026/27: 13
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2182
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 20
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: PDC Irwell Road
Site Address: Off Irwell Road, WA4 6BB
Ward: Latchford West
Existing Use: Vacant council offices and disused playing field.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.87 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.683
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Whilst the site does not currently benefit from planning permission it is considered to be suitable, available and
achievable. The site has been identified to be brought forward for residential use by the Council's newly created Housing Company in
the medium‐term. The site is therefore considered to be developable (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 50
Residual Net Capacity: 50
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 50
2022/23:
2024/25: 10
2026/27: 20
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2187
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 12
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Bewsey Old School
Site Address: Off Lockton Lane, Besey, WA5 0BF
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Cleared site
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.8 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.72
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Whilst the site does not currently benefit from planning permission it is considered to be suitable, available and
achievable. The site has been identified to be brought forward for residential use by the Council's newly created Housing Company in
the medium‐term. The site is therefore considered to be developable (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 22
Residual Net Capacity: 22
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 22
2022/23:
2024/25: 10
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2188
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Delenty Drive Police Station
Site Address: Delenty Drive, Birchwood, WA3 6AN
Ward: Birchwood
Existing Use: Police Station
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.31 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.31
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: Yes
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however considered to be developable in the long term (11‐15) owing to the development
pressures on the directly adjacent sites and hence likely attractiveness of the site to the market.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 8
Residual Net Capacity: 8
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 8
2027/28:
2029/30: 8
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2189
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Bridgewater House and Depot
Site Address: Off Sandy Lane, Stockton Heath, WA4 2AY
Ward: Stockton Heath
Existing Use: Council depot and waste transfer station.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.43 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.387
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development and remains in operational use. The site is however considered to be developable in the
medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 12
Residual Net Capacity: 12
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 12
2022/23:
2024/25: 12
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2193
2018/19:
2020/21: 11
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Houghton Hall
Site Address: Greenwood Crescent, Orford, WA2 0DT
Ward: Poplars & Hulme
Existing Use: Elderly home.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.49 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.441
Planning Permission History: 2013/22678
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and whilst does not benefit from planning permission is
nevertheless likely to be disposed of and developed in the short‐term. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 21
Residual Net Capacity: 21
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 21
2017/18:
2019/20: 10
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2198
2018/19: 8
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Harrison Square
Site Address: Longshaw Street, Bewsey, WA5 0HQ
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Commercial units
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.36 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.36
Planning Permission History: 2015/26262
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and benefits from a planning approval for residential
development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 24
Residual Net Capacity: 24
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 24
2017/18: 16
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2261
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 11
2030/31:
Site Name: Rear of former Hewden Tool Hire
Site Address: Laburnum Lane, Gt Sankey, WA5 3LE
Ward: Great Sankey North
Existing Use: Vacant
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.42 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.378
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 11
Residual Net Capacity: 11
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 11
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2408
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Oak Lawn
Site Address: Crouchley Lane, Lymm, Warrington, WA13 0TH
Ward: Lymm South
Existing Use: Residential
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.31 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.31
Planning Permission History: 2012/20028
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development following a recent expiry. The site is now therefore treated as developable (6‐10 years) rather than
deliverable.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 0
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25: 0
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2456
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Whispers, Green Lane
Site Address: Whispers, Green Lane, Winwick, WA2 8SE
Ward: Burtonwood & Winwick
Existing Use: Residential curtilage
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.42 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.378
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however being promoted for development with recent pre‐application discussions. The site is
therefore considered to be deliverable in the 0‐5 year period.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 4
Residual Net Capacity: 4
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 4
2017/18:
2019/20: 4
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2460
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Boulting Electrical Systems
Site Address: Chapel Road, Penketh, WA5 2PR
Ward: Penketh & Cuerdley
Existing Use: Industrial unit / office
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.48 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.432
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium / longer‐term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 8
Residual Net Capacity: 8
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 8
2027/28: 8
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2463
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Midland Way / Priestley Street Garage
Site Address: Midland Way / Priestley Street Garage
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Tile showroom
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.39 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.39
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is however considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 25
Residual Net Capacity: 25
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 25
2027/28:
2029/30: 25
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2464
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31: 23
Site Name: Crosfield Street ALDI
Site Address: Crosfield Street, Warrington,
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: ALDI superstore.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.65 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.585
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is however considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 46
Residual Net Capacity: 46
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 46
2027/28:
2029/30: 23
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2466
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 17
2025/26: 35
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Warrington Central Trading Estate
Site Address: Warrington Central Trading Estate, off Bewsey Road,
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Trading Estate
Gross Site Area (Ha): 4.57 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 3.4275
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is however considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10) with
ongoing discussions regarding the redevelopment of this site testament to this.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 137
Residual Net Capacity: 137
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 122
2022/23:
2024/25: 35
2026/27: 35
Developable 2027‐2032: 15
2027/28: 15
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2469
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Portland Trade Park
Site Address: Tanners Lane / Erwood Street, Warrington
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Trade park
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.58 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.522
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is however considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 35
Residual Net Capacity: 35
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 35
2027/28:
2029/30: 35
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2471
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 10
2030/31: 29
Site Name: Pinners Brow Retail Park
Site Address: Pinners Brow, Warrington, WA2 7XA
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Retail Park
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.98 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.485
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is considered to be a long term opportunity developable (11‐15) within the
plan period, as it is likely to be a latter phase of the Stadium Quarter build out.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 74
Residual Net Capacity: 74
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 74
2027/28:
2029/30: 35
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2472
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 15
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Cabinet Works and Vicinity
Site Address: Cairo Street / Barbauld Street, Warrington
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Derelict buildings / vacant land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.28 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.28
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development and requires a sensitive design solution. The site is therefore considered to be developable (6‐10) given the
landowner is promoting development in the short term, as evidenced through recent pre‐application discussions.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 15
Residual Net Capacity: 15
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 15
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2474
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31: 26
Site Name: Site of former Andrew Harris furniture
Site Address: Dial Street, Warrington, WA1 2PA
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Gym (Us Class D2).
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.42 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.378
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. An alternative use has recently been established within the unit, consequently the site is currently
unavailable and redevelopment aspirations are therefore reliant upon any future acquisition. On this basis, the site retains potential to
be developable in the longer term (11‐15) given the links to wider Council aspirations and intentions for town centre regeneration.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 39
Residual Net Capacity: 39
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 39
2027/28:
2029/30: 13
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2477
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Crossley Street
Site Address: Land at Crossley Street
Ward: Fairfield & Howley
Existing Use: Mixed use commercial and retail works.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.25 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.25
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is however considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 33
Residual Net Capacity: 33
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 33
2027/28:
2029/30: 33
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2478
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31: 10
Site Name: General Street Metal Works
Site Address: General Street, Warrington, WA1
Ward: Fairfield & Howley
Existing Use: Scrap/metal merchants
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.34 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.34
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is however considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 14
Residual Net Capacity: 14
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 14
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32: 4
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2480
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former K&N works
Site Address: Lythgoes Lane
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Vacant building and yard.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.32 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.32
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is however considered to be developable in the longer term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 38
Residual Net Capacity: 38
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 38
2027/28:
2029/30: 38
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2481
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31: 20
Site Name: Land enclosed by Hopwood Street, School Brow and Crossley Street
Site Address: Land enclosed by Hopwood St, School Brow and Crossley St, Warrington
Ward: Fairfield & Howley
Existing Use: Retail park.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.93 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.837
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development and remains in active use. The site is however considered to be developable in the
longer term (11‐15) once emerging redevelopment plans and proposals in this locality are advanced.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 42
Residual Net Capacity: 42
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 42
2027/28:
2029/30: 10
2031/32: 12
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2521
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land to the rear of The Foxes
Site Address: Firs Lane, Appleton, WA4 5LD
Ward: Appleton
Existing Use: Residential curtilage
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.4 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.4
Planning Permission History: 2013/21920
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development and is under constructions.
Capacity is therefore considered to be deliverable (0 ‐ 5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 1
2017/18: 1
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2534
2018/19: 1
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Luqmans Indian Cuisine
Site Address: Phipps Lane, Burtonwood, WA5 4HQ
Ward: Burtonwood & Winwick
Existing Use: Indian restaurant
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.27 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.27
Planning Permission History: 2013/21461
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development . Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 1
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2543
2018/19: 2
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Council / Scout building at Junction of Troutbeck Avenue &
Longshaw Street
Site Address: Warrington, WA5 0BA
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.4 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.4
Planning Permission History: 2013/22561
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 2
Residual Net Capacity: 2
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 2
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2564
2018/19: 1
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Dennow Farm
Site Address: Firs Lane, Appleton, WA4 5LF
Ward: Appleton
Existing Use: Office
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.3 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.3
Planning Permission History: 2014/23011
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 1
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2580
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Rhinewood Hotel
Site Address: Glazebrook Lane, Glazebrook, WA3 5BB
Ward: Rixton & Woolston
Existing Use: Hotel
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.92 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.828
Planning Permission History: 2014/24573
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development and is evidently available.
Capacity is therefore considered to be deliverable within forthcoming years (0‐5 land supply).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 36
Residual Net Capacity: 9
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 9
2017/18: 9
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2581
2018/19: 4
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Willowpool Nurseries site
Site Address: 25 Burford Lane, Lymm, WA13 0SH
Ward: Lymm South
Existing Use: Former garden centre and nursey
Gross Site Area (Ha): 2.02 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.808
Planning Permission History: 2015/26642
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF/PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development and is evidently available.
Capacity is therefore considered to be deliverable within forthcoming years (0‐5 land supply).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 14
Residual Net Capacity: 14
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 14
2017/18: 10
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2582
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 20
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Disused Railway Line (Parcel 1)
Site Address: Station Rd, Latchford
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: Disused Railway Embankment
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.71 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.639
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: Yes
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Included in developable (6‐10 year) land supply to reflect potential lead in times to overcome policy constraints
and necessary land preparation for redevelopment.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 49
Residual Net Capacity: 49
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 49
2022/23: 10
2024/25: 19
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2583
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 35
2025/26: 35
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Disused Railway Line (Parcel 2)
Site Address: Station Rd, Latchford
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: Disused Railway Embankment
Gross Site Area (Ha): 2.0870868508 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.5653151381
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No known issues but further work needed to clarify ground conditions given
historical use as railway line and proposals to remove embankment.
Site Access Issues: No known issues with regards to access.
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Included in developable (6‐10 year) land supply to reflect potential lead in times to overcome policy constraints
and necessary land preparation for redevelopment.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 144
Residual Net Capacity: 144
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 144
2022/23: 17
2024/25: 35
2026/27: 22
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2584
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 35
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Disused Railway Line (Parcel 3)
Site Address: Land to west of Wash Lane, Latchford
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: Disused Railway Embankment
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.2684366195 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.1415929575
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No known issues but further work needed to clarify ground conditions given
historical use as railway line and proposals to remove embankment.
Site Access Issues: No known issues with regards to access.
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes ‐ Further evidence required
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Included in developable (6‐10 year) land supply to reflect potential lead in times to overcome policy constraints
and necessary land preparation for redevelopment.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 87
Residual Net Capacity: 87
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 87
2022/23: 17
2024/25: 35
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2603
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 10
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at Thelwall Lane West
Site Address: Westy, Warrington ,WA4 1PD
Ward: Latchford East
Existing Use: Storage yard
Gross Site Area (Ha): 2.36 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.77
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered potentially suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit
from a planning approval for residential development. The site is partly constrained by flood risk however the remainder is considered
developable for residential purposes in the medium term (6‐10) in accordance with the 2014 Call for Sites submission.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 60
Residual Net Capacity: 60
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 60
2022/23:
2024/25: 50
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2633
2018/19: 9
2020/21: 4
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Orford Farm
Site Address: School Road, Orford, WA2 9BW
Ward: Orford
Existing Use: Residential
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.53 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.53
Planning Permission History: 2014/24291
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development and is evidently available.
Capacity is therefore considered to be deliverable within 0‐5 period.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 34
Residual Net Capacity: 33
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 33
2017/18:
2019/20: 20
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2658
2018/19: 29
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Hawthorne Business Park
Site Address: Hawthorne Street, Warrington, WA5 0BT
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Industrial Estate.
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.03 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.927
Planning Permission History: 2016/29157
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: The site is considered suitable, available and achievable and whilst it does not currently benefit from a detailed
planning approval for residential development it has recently been subject to a full planning application (2016/29157). The site is
therefore considered to be deliverable in the short (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 46
Residual Net Capacity: 46
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 46
2017/18: 17
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2662
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: 89 ‐ 91 Bewsey Street
Site Address: 89 ‐ 91 Bewsey Street
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Office
Gross Site Area (Ha): Net Developable Site Area (Ha):
Planning Permission History: 2014/24308
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: N/A
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development and is evidently available.
Capacity is therefore considered to be deliverable within 0‐5 period.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 2
Residual Net Capacity: 2
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 2
2017/18: 2
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2672
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 27
2028/29: 55
2030/31: 53
Site Name: Land south of Wilson Patten Street (inc former Mr Smiths)
Site Address: Land south of Wilson Patten Street, Warrington
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Mixed use
Gross Site Area (Ha): 3.4 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 2.38
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: Yes ‐ Further evidence required
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is therefore considered developable from the medium term onwards (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 300
Residual Net Capacity: 300
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 82
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27: 55
Developable 2027‐2032: 218
2027/28: 55
2029/30: 55
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2673
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 17
2025/26: 35
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: New Town House
Site Address: New Town House, Buttermarket Street, Warrington
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Offices
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.82 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.738
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is therefore considered developable from the medium term onwards (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 110
Residual Net Capacity: 110
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 110
2022/23:
2024/25: 35
2026/27: 23
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2678
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 9
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: 20 Dallam Lane
Site Address: 20 Dallam Lane, Warrington, WA2 7NG
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Health Centre
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.27 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.09
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is therefore considered developable from the medium term onwards (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 9
Residual Net Capacity: 9
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 9
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2681
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land bounded by Haydock Street, Ashton Street and John Street
Site Address: Land bounded by Haydock Street, Ashton Street and John Street,
Warrington
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.38 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.38
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: Yes ‐ Further evidence required
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is therefore considered developable from the medium term onwards (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 38
Residual Net Capacity: 38
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 38
2022/23:
2024/25: 38
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2682
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 17
2030/31: 28
Site Name: Land bounded by Winwick Road, Orford Lane and Bluecoat Street
Site Address: Land bounded by Winwick Road, Orford Lane and Bluecoat Street,
Warrington
Ward: Orford
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.61 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.449
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: Yes ‐ Further evidence required
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: No
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is therefore considered developable in the long term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 80
Residual Net Capacity: 80
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 80
2027/28:
2029/30: 35
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2684
2018/19: 10
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: The Harrison Centre
Site Address: Boulting Avenue, Dallam, WA5 0HG
Ward: Bewsey & Whitecross
Existing Use: Community centre
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.14 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.026
Planning Permission History: 2016/28746
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development and is evidently available.
Capacity is therefore considered to be deliverable within 0‐5 period.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 21
Residual Net Capacity: 21
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 21
2017/18:
2019/20: 11
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2685
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 10
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Orford Embankment 1
Site Address: North of Fitzherbert Street, Orford
Ward: Orford
Existing Use: Disused Railway Embankment
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.93 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.837
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: Yes
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 17
Residual Net Capacity: 17
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 17
2022/23:
2024/25: 7
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2686
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 10
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Orford Embankment 2
Site Address: North of Fitzherbert Street, Orford
Ward: Orford
Existing Use: Disused Railway Embankment
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.63 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.567
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 2
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: Yes
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 11
Residual Net Capacity: 11
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 11
2022/23:
2024/25: 1
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2687
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 10
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Orford Embankment 3
Site Address: North of Fitzherbert Street, Orford
Ward: Orford
Existing Use: Disused Railway Embankment
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.59 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.531
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3b
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: Yes
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, achievable and whilst not available at present is likely to become available within
the plan period. The site is therefore considered to be developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 11
Residual Net Capacity: 11
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 11
2022/23:
2024/25: 1
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2690
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 4
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: James Phoenix House
Site Address: Hilden Road, Orford, WA2 0JP
Ward: Poplars & Hulme
Existing Use: Vacant land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.52 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.468
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3b
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development nor is a specific proposal being actively promoted at this time. On this basis although the site could be
brought forward sooner it is cautiously treated as developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 14
Residual Net Capacity: 14
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 14
2022/23:
2024/25: 10
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2691
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29: 10
2030/31:
Site Name: Holcroft Grange
Site Address: Jackson Avenue, Culcheth, WA3 4DZ
Ward: Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft
Existing Use: Care home
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.47 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.423
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: Yes
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is therefore considered developable in the long term (11‐15).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 15
Residual Net Capacity: 15
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 15
2027/28:
2029/30: 5
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2692
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 13
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Fox Wood School
Site Address: Chatfield Drive, Birchwood
Ward: Birchwood
Existing Use: Former school
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.32 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.66
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to be available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning
approval for residential development. The Council are likely to be actively disposing of the site from September 2015 onwards and as
such it is therefore considered to be developable in the medium‐term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 23
Residual Net Capacity: 23.1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 23
2022/23: 10
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2700
2018/19:
2020/21: 8
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Elm Tree Inn and Bridge Inn
Site Address: Phipps Lane, Burtonwood, WA5 4HX
Ward: Burtonwood & Winwick
Existing Use: Vacant
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.4 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.264
Planning Permission History: 2015/27007
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF/PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: No
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 18
Residual Net Capacity: 18
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 18
2017/18:
2019/20: 10
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2704
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24: 6
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at Boarded Barn Farm
Site Address: Birchbrook Road, Lymm, WA13 9RZ
Ward: Lymm North & Thelwall
Existing Use: Mixed use
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.02 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.92
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: Yes
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained by Green Belt designation. Although it can
be assumed that small scale redevelopment may be acceptable, due to openness considerations and an absence of a specific scheme
the net developable area is necessarily restricted.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 6
Residual Net Capacity: 6
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 6
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2711
2018/19: 10
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land North of Farmers Arms
Site Address: Rushgreen Road, Lymm, WA13 9RD
Ward: Lymm North & Thelwall
Existing Use: Car park
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.31 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.31
Planning Permission History: 2015/26780
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: N/A
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and currently benefits from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 10
Residual Net Capacity: 10
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 10
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2716
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land at Peel Cottage
Site Address: Radley Lane, Houghton Green, WA2 0SY
Ward: Poplars & Hulme
Existing Use: Residential curtilage
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.4 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.4
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and although it does not currently benefit from a planning
approval for residential development it is considered to be deliverable (0‐5 ).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 4
Residual Net Capacity: 4
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 4
2022/23:
2024/25: 4
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2719
2018/19:
2020/21: 16
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: The Royal British Legion
Site Address: 99 Greystone Road, Penketh, Warrington, WA5 2ER
Ward: Penketh & Cuerdley
Existing Use: Assembly/leisure
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.85 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.77
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: No
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and although it does not currently benefit from a planning
approval for residential development it is considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 26
Residual Net Capacity: 26
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 26
2017/18:
2019/20: 10
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2720
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 33
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Radley Cottage
Site Address: Radley Lane, Houghton Green, Warrington, WA2 0SZ
Ward: Poplars & Hulme
Existing Use: Vacant Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.87 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.68
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: Yes
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and although it does not currently benefit from a planning
approval for residential development it is considered to be deliverable (0‐5 ).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 50
Residual Net Capacity: 50
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 50
2022/23:
2024/25: 17
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2822
2018/19: 2
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Top Farm, Higher Lane
Site Address: Lymm, Warrington, WA13 0RW
Ward: Lymm South
Existing Use: Agricultural
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.3 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.3
Planning Permission History: 2015/25207
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 2
Residual Net Capacity: 2
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 2
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2859
2018/19: 0
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Cop Holt Farm
Site Address: Newton Road, Winwick, Warrington, WA2 8SH
Ward: Burtonwood & Winwick
Existing Use: Residential
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.28 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.28
Planning Permission History: 2015/26713
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 0
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2879
2018/19: 7
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Units 1 & 2
Site Address: Barsbank Lane, Lymm, Warrington, WA13 0ER
Ward: Lymm South
Existing Use: Industrial Units
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.3 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.3
Planning Permission History: 2015/26712
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 7
Residual Net Capacity: 7
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 7
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2905
2018/19:
2020/21: 8
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: 20 Beatrice Street
Site Address: Beatrice Street, WA4 1DR
Ward: Latchford West
Existing Use: Industrial
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.41 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.369
Planning Permission History: 2016/27350
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3a
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: Yes
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 18
Residual Net Capacity: 18
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 18
2017/18:
2019/20: 10
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2907
2018/19:
2020/21: 21
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former station goods yard
Site Address: Off Green Lane, Padgate, WA1 4HU
Ward: Poulton North
Existing Use: Vacant land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.82 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.738
Planning Permission History: 2016/29398
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and although it does not currently benefit from a planning
approval for residential development it is considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 31
Residual Net Capacity: 31
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 31
2017/18:
2019/20: 10
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 2908
2018/19:
2020/21: 93
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Former Bayleaf PH
Site Address: Harpers Road, Fearnhead, WA2 0PB
Ward: Poulton North
Existing Use: Vacant building and car park
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.01 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.909
Planning Permission History: 2016/27896
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 93
Residual Net Capacity: 93
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 93
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 3006
2018/19: 2
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: The Old Stables
Site Address: Marsh Lane, Cuerdley, WA5 2UN
Ward: Penketh & Cuerdley
Existing Use: Vacant Building
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.25 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.25
Planning Permission History: 2016/27379
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 2
Residual Net Capacity: 2
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 2
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 3013
2018/19: 1
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Thelwall Heyes
Site Address: Cliff Lane, Grappenhall, WA4 2TS
Ward: Lymm North & Thelwall
Existing Use: Vacant Building
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.3 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.3
Planning Permission History: 2016/28135
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: GF/PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 1
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 3034
2018/19: 2
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Old Barn at Agden Lane Farm
Site Address: Agden Lane, Lymm, WA13 0UQ
Ward: Lymm South
Existing Use: Agricultural building
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.5 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.5
Planning Permission History: 2016/28830
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 2
Residual Net Capacity: 2
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 2
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 3043
2018/19: 0
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: 12 Dam Lane
Site Address: Croft, WA3 7HF
Ward: Culcheth, Glazebury and Croft
Existing Use: Residential
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.26 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.26
Planning Permission History: 2016/29150
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site):
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 0
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 3050
2018/19: 10
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land behind the Harrison Centre
Site Address: Boulting Avenue, Dallam, WA5 0HG
Ward: Bewsey and Whitecross
Existing Use: Playing fields
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.52 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.52
Planning Permission History: 2016/29254
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development and is evidently available.
Capacity is therefore considered to be deliverable within 0‐5 period.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 20
Residual Net Capacity: 20
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 20
2017/18:
2019/20: 10
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 3135
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26: 20
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Long Meadow
Site Address: Chapel Road, Penketh, WA5 2PW
Ward: Penketh & Cuerdley
Existing Use: Vacant Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 1.1 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.99
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 3
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: No
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, likely to become available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, likely to become available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a
planning approval for residential development. The site is therefore considered developable in the medium term (6‐10).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 30
Residual Net Capacity: 30
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 0
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 30
2022/23:
2024/25: 10
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 3149
2018/19:
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Land between 42 & 48 Culcheth Hall Drive
Site Address: Culcheth, WA3 4PT
Ward: Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft
Existing Use: Vacant Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.74 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.666
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable and whilst does not benefit from planning permission is
nevertheless likely to be developed in the short‐term. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5).
Recommended Gross Capacity: 4
Residual Net Capacity: 4
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 4
2017/18:
2019/20: 4
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 18251
2018/19:
2020/21: 20
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Gemini 16
Site Address: Carina Park, Westbrook
Ward: Westbrook
Existing Use: New Town Reserved Land
Gross Site Area (Ha): 2 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 1.8
Planning Permission History: n/a
Green Belt: No
GF / PDL: GF
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1 & SW
Contaminated Land Issues: Yes
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: Yes.
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: Yes
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site is considered suitable, available and achievable but does not currently benefit from a planning approval for
residential development. The site is however being actively promoted and the site is therefore considered to be deliverable (0‐5) in
view of adjoining parcel having already received planning permission for similar development.
Recommended Gross Capacity: 30
Residual Net Capacity: 30
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 30
2017/18:
2019/20: 10
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
SHLAA Reference ‐ 3048
2018/19: 1
2020/21:
2023/24:
2025/26:
2028/29:
2030/31:
Site Name: Vacant Site at Ramswood Nurseries
Site Address: Mill Lane, Walton, WA46TL
Ward: Appleton
Existing Use: Agricultural
Gross Site Area (Ha): 0.3 Net Developable Site Area (Ha): 0.3
Planning Permission History: 2016/28929
Green Belt: Yes
GF / PDL: PDL
Flood Zone (Highest Risk on site): 1
Contaminated Land Issues: No
Ground Conditions Issues: No
Site Access Issues: No
Surrounding Land Issues: No
Infrastructure Issues: No
Hazardous Installations Issues: No
Amenity Issues: No
Ownership / Tenancy Issues: No
Active Use: No
Site Developable Now: Yes
Promotion by Owner: Yes
Developer Interest: Yes
Known Demand for Housing: Yes
Similar Sites Developed Nearby in last 5 years: Yes
Concluding Recommendation: Suitable, available and achievable
Concluding Comments: Site currently benefits from a planning approval for residential development. Capacity is therefore considered
to be deliverable (0‐5)
Recommended Gross Capacity: 1
Residual Net Capacity: 1
Deliverable 2017‐2022: 1
2017/18:
2019/20:
2021/22:
Developable 2022‐2027: 0
2022/23:
2024/25:
2026/27:
Developable 2027‐2032: 0
2027/28:
2029/30:
2031/32:
2032+:
Appendix 2 - Constrained Sites
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
1041 Harry Fairclough Ltd. Off Howley Lane 0.55 0.50 Constrained
The site is suitable, likely to be available, but not currently achievable due to
potential access/egress being land locked by FZ3. Site should be reviewed
annually to consider any changes to flood constraints.
1503 Clevelands Farm Moss Side Lane, Rixton 1.4 1.26 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1504 Land off Thirlmere Drive Land off Thirlmere Drive, Lymm 0.4 0.4 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1505Land at the junction of Warrington
Rd/Jennet's LaneGlazebury, WA3 5QB 1.94 1.75 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1514Land off A57 Manchester Rd, Hollins
GreenLand off A57 Manchester Rd, Hollins Green 7.54 5.66 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1518 Penketh Hall Farm Complex Penketh Hall Farm, Penketh, WA5 2HR 1.71 1.54 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1521 Alcan Factory Off Thelwall Lane 5.87 4.40 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1522Land west of and to the rear of 39 ‐ 49
Brookfield RdBrookfield Rd, Culcheth 4.47 3.35 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1527Land fronting Pool Lane (north ‐
adjacent pumping station)Pool Lane, Statham 0.27 0.27 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1528Land adjacent to and west of Statham
Community Primary SchoolWarrington Road, Statham, WA13 9BE 6.77 5.08 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1531 Statham Lodge Hotel Warrington Rd, Statham, WA13 9BP 1.49 1.34 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Whilst the
constraints may be capable of being overcome, in cumulative with the current
active use it is not considered appropriate to include the site is current land
supply calculations. Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
1532 Land to the south of Nook Farm Arley Road, Appleton Thorn 16.78 12.59 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1534 Land to the south of Lumber Lane Lumber Lane, Burtonwood 5.53 4.15 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1535 Albion Park Warrington Road, Glazebury 2.86 1.43 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1542
Land to the North of Culcheth Hall
Drive, east of Withington Avenue and
Doeford Close
Culcheth, Warrington 96.3 72.23 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1543 Knutsford Road Knutsford Road, Latchford, WA4 1PL 2.48 1.86 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but availability is uncertain and achievability is
dependent upon overcoming constraints. Site should remain under review
annually.
1544 Warrington Town Football Club Ground Wash Lane / Common Lane 2.98 2.24 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1545 Rushgreen Rd, Lymm Land east of Thirlmere Drive, Lymm 22.58 16.94 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development. Whilst parts of
the site could be developed, due to them being PDL, it is considered that the site
would realistically need to be brought forward in a holistic manner.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
1553 United Utilities Pool Lane DepotPool Lane, North of Chester Road, Higher
Walton0.28 0.28 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. It is also
known that the site was recently received planning permission to operate the
site for car sales. Whilst, the consent has recently been implemented it is only
for a change of use. Therefore it is logical to retain the site within the SHLAA and
review it on an annual basis.
1554 Land at Glazebury WwTW South of Hawthorne Avenue 4.89 3.67 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development
1563Arpley Meadows (southern former
landing stage)Arpley Meadows 7.79 5.84 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1565 Land west of Reddish Crescent Lymm, WA13 9PR 2.63 1.97 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1567Land at Warrington Road / Hawthorne
AvenueCulcheth, WA3 5JS 0.28 0.28 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1568Land at Warrington Road (rear of Nos
134 ‐ 182)Glazebury, WA3 5LW 1.71 1.54 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1573 Queens Crescent Equipped Play Area Queens Crescent, Padgate 0.29 0.29 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1576 Neville Avenue Garage PlotsLand to the rear of 96 Neville Avenue,
Orford, WA2 9BE0.29 0.19 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1594 College Close Amenity AreaNorth‐west corner of College Close (adjoining
south ‐western boundary of St. Elphins Park)0.25 0.25 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1603 Warrington RUFC Site Bridge Lane, Appleton 2.75 1.79 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1610Birchwood Golf Course (east of
Carrington Close)East of Carrington Close, Birchwood 1.77 1.59 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1611Land to the east of Walton Lea Road,
Higher Walton
Land to the east of Walton Lea Road, Higher
Walton3.23 2.42 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1612Northern Farms Ltd ‐ Cherry Lane /
Booths Lane, LymmCherry Lane / Booths Lane, Lymm 40.3 30.23 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1618 Land south east of Deans Lane, ThelwallLand south east of Deans Lane, Thelwall,
WA4 2TN16.68 12.51 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1621Land immediately surrounding Pool
FarmPool Lane / Oldfield Road, Statham 0.5 0.13 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1622Land between Oldfield Road and
Warrington Road
Land between Oldfield Road and Warrington
Road, Statham1.43 1.29 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1623 Land West of Highfields Stables Off Highfield Stables, Weaste Lane 0.58 0.52 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1624 Land South of Highfield Stables Off Highfield Stables, Weaste Lane 1.15 1.04 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
1625 Land North of Highfield Stables Weaste Lane, Thelwall 1.18 1.06 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1626 Land south of 128, Weaste Lane Off Highfield Stables, Weaste Lane 0.93 0.84 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1627 Land North of Weaste Lane Weaste Lane, Thelwall 4.69 3.52 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1628 Land to the rear of 27 ‐ 47 Weaste Lane Weaste Lane, Thelwall 1.43 1.29 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1629Expanse of land to the west of Penketh
Hall FarmHall Nook, Penketh, Warrington 18.82 14.12 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1630 Penketh Hall Farm Site C South of Station Rd, Penketh 17.47 13.10 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1635 Former planting siteEast of Spring Lane (south west of Croft
riding school)0.91 0.82 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1638Broomedge Nurseries (formerly
Hampson Nursery)Fronting Burford Lane, Lymm 3 2.25 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1645 Land adjacent 123 Fairfield Road Fairfield Road, Stockton Heath 0.27 0.27 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1654Land bounded by Green Lane / Lumber
Lane / Phipps Lane / Winsford Drive
Green Lane / Lumber Lane / Phipps Lane /
Winsford Drive, Burtonwood11.5 8.63 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1655 Land West of Phipps Lane Land West of Phipps Lane, Burtonwood 7.35 5.51 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1656Lumbers Lane / Forshaw's Lane / Phipps
Lane
Lumbers Lane / Forshaw's Lane / Phipps
Lane, Burtonwood10.4 7.80 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1706The Avoiding Line North of Ryefields
VillageNorth of Ryefields Village 1.95 1.76 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1707 Alford Hall Social Club overflow car park Accessed from Bennett Avenue 0.39 0.39 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1800 Land Adjacent to Rose Villa Penkford Lane, Collins Green, WA5 4EE 0.27 0.27 ConstrainedPlanning consent for alternative use has been implemented. Site to be
discounted from future SHLAA reviews
1806 Land adj to 220 Stone Pitt Lane Land adj to 220 Stone Pitt Lane, Croft 0.5 0.45 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1831 Land off Newcombe Avenue Land off Newcombe Avenue 1.81 1.36 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1832 Whittle Hall Farm Littledale Road, Whittle Hall, WA5 3AQ 0.71 0.64 ConstrainedPlanning consent for alternative use has been implemented. Site to be
discounted from future SHLAA reviews
1861 Land North of Mayfair CloseOff Lingley Green Avenue, North of Mayfair
Close, Great Sankey1.58 0.79 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
1865 Thelwall Heyes FarmCliff Lane, Grappenhall, Warrington, WA4
2TS21.64 16.23 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
1866 Greater Shepcroft Farm Stretton, Warrington, WA4 5PL 56.54 42.41 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1886 Land at Cherry Lane, Lymm Adjacent to 144, Cherry Lane, Lymm 0.91 0.82 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1888 Land at Sutch Lane Land at Sutch Lane, Lymm 2.55 1.91 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
1891 Land fronting Pool LaneNorth & east of Pool Farm, Pool Lane,
Statham1.6 1.20 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2125Land at junction of Lodge Lane and
Lockton Lane, Bewsey
Land at junction of Lodge Lane and Lockton
Lane, Bewsey0.37 0.37 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
2146 Land off Lumber Lane, Burtonwood Land off Lumber Lane, Burtonwood 4.54 3.41 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2147 Orford Fields Land off Birchwood Way, Warrington 3.1 2.33 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
2149 Lingley Mere Business Park Car Park Lingley Mere, Great Sankey, WA5 3LP 1.96 1.76 Constrained
Site is considered unsuitable for residential development at present. Site may be
deemed suitable in future years depending on the delivery of adjacent sites to
the east and south. Site therefore to be kept under annual review.
2155Land to the North and East of Croft
Primary SchoolEast of Mustard Lane, Croft 6.33 4.75 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2156 Land to the West of Heath Lane, Croft Land to the West of Heath Lane, Croft 6.78 5.09 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2157Land between Glaizers Lane and
Warrington Road, Culcheth
Land between Glaizers Lane and Warrington
Road, Culcheth4.81 3.61 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2161Land to the west of Oughtrington Lane,
South of the Bridgewater Canal
Land to the west of Oughtrington Lane,
South of the Bridgewater Canal9.29 6.97 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2171Land between Manchester Road and
Warburton Bridge RoadRixton, WA3 6HL 12.22 9.17 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2180Land to the east of Oughtrington
Community Primary School
Between Moss Grove and Oughtrington
Crescent, Lymm, WA13 9EH1 0.90 Constrained Site is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
2181Land to the rear of Oughtrington
Crescent Community CentreOughtrington, Lymm, WA13 9JD 0.29 0.29 Constrained Site is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
2192 Westy Hall Care Home Marsden Avenue, Westy, WA1 1BU 0.59 0.53 Constrained Site is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
2244Land between Underbridge Lane and
Chester Road
Land between Underbridge Lane and Chester
Road0.5 0.45 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2246 Croft Youth Centre Croft Youth Centre, Smithy Lane, Croft 0.5 0.5 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
2273 Motortrade Old Liverpool Road, WA5 1DP 0.52 0.47 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
2450 Land adjacent Colas, Loushers Lane
Land to the north west of Colas, south east
of Priestley College, Loushers Lane,
Latchford, Warrington
2.44 1.83 Constrained
Site is considered unsuitable for residential development at present. There is
nevertheless a strong interest in developing this site and it may be as further
exploratory work is undertaken this conclusion may need to be revisited.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
2452Land bounded by Birch Brook Road/Mill
Lane, Heatley
Land bounded by Birch Brook Road/Mill
Lane, Heatley3.70 2.78 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2455Land south of Travis Perkins, Farrell
Street, Warrington
Land south of Travis Perkins, Farrell Street,
Warrington0.53 0.48 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
2457 Land at Ashton's Farm, Burtonwood Land off Clay Lane, Burtonwood, WA5 4DH 17.23 12.92 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2458Site of William Tarr and Co. Ltd. Offices
(Site 1)Off Bridge Road, Woolston, WA1 4AT 0.55 0.50 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development is currently constrained. Site to be
reviewed on an annual basis.
2461Land north of Burley Lane/Arley Road
junctionAppleton, WA4 4RL 0.74 0.67 Constrained
Site is likely suitable but its development potential is currently considered to be
constrained. As such the site cannot be considered deliverable or developable at
this time. Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
2462Land at junction of Bell Lane / Stockport
Road (south of Beech House)Thelwall, WA4 2SY 0.64 0.58 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2482 Wharf Industrial Estate Wharf Street, Warrington 4.86 3.65 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
2588 Taylor Business Park Warrington Road, Culcheth, WA3 6BH 12.3 9.23 Constrained
Footprint of existing business park may be capable of development if constraints
can be overcome. Open land not included in land supply at present due to Green
Belt restrictions, but situation will be reviewed annually.
2589 Land north of Arbury Court Townsfield Lane, Winwick, WA2 8RW 7.62 5.72 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2590Land west of Delph Fm/Hollins Park
HospitalDelph Lane, Winwick, WA2 8RW 33.76 25.32 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2591 Land east of Warrington Rowing Club Howley Lane, Warrington, WA1 2OJ 1.31 1.18 Constrained
Not achievable for residential unless flood risk mitigation can be proven as
feasible or the exception test is passed. Not included in land supply at present,
situation will be reviewed annually.
2592 Penketh Business Park (Parcel 2)Old Liverpool Road, Great Sankey,
Warrington, WA5 2TJ2.54 1.91 Constrained
Constrained by policy restrictions relating to loss of employment land . Not
included in land supply at present, situation will be reviewed annually.
2593 Land south of Newhall Lane (Plot 1) Culcheth, Warrington, WA3 6BH 1.52 1.37 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2594Land south of Taylor Business Park (Plot
2)Culcheth, Warrington, WA3 0.48 0.43 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2595Land at jtn Warrington Rd and Glaziers
Lane (Plot 3)Culcheth, Warrington, WA3 0.87 0.78 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2596 Land east of Warrington Rd (Plot 4) Culcheth, Warrington, WA3 0.51 0.46 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2597Land south of disused railway line (Plot
5)Culcheth, Warrington, WA3 0.79 0.71 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2598Land at NW corner of Taylor Business
Park (Plot 6) Culcheth, Warrington, WA3 0.97 0.87 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2601 Statham MeadowsLand adjoining Jtn 21 of M6, Woolston, WA3
6HD12.5 9.38 Constrained
Not available, suitable or achievable for residential. Not included in land supply
and not subject to review unless a future call for sites submission is provided
suggesting suitability for residential use.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
2602 Land at Thelwall Lane East Westy, Warrington ,WA4 1PD 4.24 3.18 Constrained
Site is available, but is heavily constrained and therefore cannot be considered
suitable or achievable for residential development at present. Situation to be
reviewed annually, but not included in current land supply.
2657 New Cut Lane Industrial EstateNew Cut Lane Ind Estate, New Cut Lane,
Woolston, WA1 4AG14.99 11.24 Constrained
Not achievable for residential due to current policy constraints which must be
demonstrated as overcome for the site to be considered developable. Not
included in land supply at present, situation will be reviewed annually.
2668 Land adjacent South View Hatton Lane, Hatton, WA4 4BZ 5 3.75 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2669Duckinfield Farm, Land south of Hurst
Mill Bridge
Land south of Hurst Mill Bridge, Warrington
Road, Glazebury, WA31.7 1.53 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2670 Highfield FarmHighfield Farm, Waterworks Lane, Winwick,
WA2 8TB7 5.25 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2671 Land south of Chester Road Land south of Chester Road, Walton 7.36 5.15 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2675 Colas LtdColas Ltd, Loushers Lane, Latchford,
Warrington, WA4 6RZ1.69 1.52 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
2676 Causeway ParkCauseway Park, off Central Avenue,
Warrington, WA4 6QS9.65 5.79 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
2677 Riverside Retail ParkRiverside Retail Park, Wharf Street,
Warrington, WA1 2GZ5.43 4.34 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
2683 Land off Cherry Lane and Booths Lane Land off Cherry Lane and Booths Lane, Lymm 8.62 6.47 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2689 Land east of Blackbrook Avenue Blackbrook Avenue, Padgate 1.96 1.37 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
2694 Land North of Hawthorn CentreOrange Grove / Blackbrook Avenue, Padgate,
WA2 0SP0.36 0.36 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
2695 Land South of Hawthorn CentreHarrier Road / Blackbrook Avenue, Padgate,
WA2 0SP1.38 1.24 Constrained
Site is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
2699 Land south of Culcheth High School Warrington Road, Culcheth 1.76 1.58 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
2705 Land at Cherry Lane Cherry Lane, Lymm, WA13 0NU 13.5 10.13 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2706 Kenyon Lane Nurseries Kenyon Lane, Croft, WA3 4AX 1.2 1.08 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2709Land North West of Croft (part covered
by 2156)Smithy Brow, Croft, WA3 7BZ 128.2 96.3 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2710 Land to the West of Higher Walton Chester Road, Higher Walton, WA4 6TL. 124.5 93.38 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2721 Trident Business Park Daten Avenue, Risley, Warrington, WA3 6BX 8.75 6.56 ConstrainedConstrained by policy restrictions relating to loss of employment land. Not
included in land supply at present, situation will be reviewed annually.
2722 Land at Hillside Farm Hillside Road, Appleton 4.22 3.17 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2901 Land east of Crouchley Lane Lymm, WA13 0DH 13.4 10.05 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
2902Land Jtn of Stretton Rd and Tarporley
RoadStretton, WA4 4NS 39.2 29.4 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2903 Land north of Grappenhall Lane Grappenhall, WA4 4SH 48.94 36.705 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
2904Land between Weaste Lane and
Knutsford RoadGrappenhall, WA4 3JY 15.94 11.955 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3100 Stocks Lane / Laburnum Lane Laburnum Lane, Penketh, WA5 3AB 32.12 24.09 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3101 Land at Fir Tree Close Fir Tree Close, Stretton, WA4 4NA 2.84 2.13 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3102 Birch Tree Farm Red Lane, Appleton, WA4 5AB 0.35 0.2625 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3103 Land at Dam Lane Dam Lane, Rixton‐with‐Glazebrook, WA3 6LB 9.88 7.41 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3104 Land at Newton Road Winwick, WA2 8SE 1.25 0.9375 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3105 Field off Stage Lane Stage Lane, Lymm, WA13 9JP 0.69 0.5175 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3106 Land at Warrington Sports Club Walton Lea Road, Walton, WA4 6SJ 0.36 0.27 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3107 Stocks Lane / Friends Lane Friends Lane, Penketh, WA5 3JT 6.69 5.0175 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3109 Holly House Rushgreen Road, Lymm, WA13 9PN 1.12 0.84 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3110 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 4690) Brook Lane, WA3 6DT 11.07 8.3025 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3111 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 4449) Brook Lane, WA3 6DS 15.35 11.5125 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
3112 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 6919) Manchester Road, Rixton, WA3 6DU 3.92 2.94 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3113 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 8160) Manchester Road, Rixton, WA3 6DX 12.62 9.465 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3114 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 8979) Holly Bush Lane, Rixton, WA3 6DZ 5.33 3.9975 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3115 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 8939) Manchester Road, Rixton, WA3 6DU 0.3 0.225 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3116 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 9624) Manchester Road, Rixton, WA3 6DU 3.31 2.4825 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3117 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 1833) Manchester Road, Rixton, WA3 6DU 7.54 5.655 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3118 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 5636) Manchester Road, Rixton, WA3 6EA 9.3 6.975 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3119 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 6318) Manchester Road, Rixton, WA3 6EA 1.79 1.3425 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3120 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 5371) Manchester Road, Rixton, WA3 6EA 0.78 0.585 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3121 Sites east pf Jctn 21 M6 (Site 3174) Holly Bush Lane, Rixton, WA3 6DY 6.02 4.515 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3122 Land north of Smithy Brow Smithy Brow, Croft, WA3 7BY 6.49 4.8675 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3123 Land south of Stockport Road Stockport Road, Thelwall, WA4 2TJ 0.82 0.615 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3124 Land off Massey Brook Lane Massey Brook Lane, Lymm, WA13 0PW 2.12 1.59 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3125 Land SE of Stretton Road Stretton Road, Appleton, WA4 4TB 5.32 3.99 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
3127 Land N of Townfield Lane Townsfield Lane, Winwick, WA2 8TE 1 0.75 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3128 Land S of Townsfield Lane Townsfield Lane, Winwick, WA2 8TR 1.72 1.29 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3129 Land at Carr House Farm Broad Lane, Grappenhall, WA4 3ET 23.92 17.94 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3130 Land at Arley Road Arley Road, Stretton, WA4 4RR 1.37 1.0275 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3131 Land to N & S of Hurst Lane Hurst Lane, Glazebury, WA3 5LS 2.09 1.5675 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3132 Land to rear of Smithy Brow Smithy Brow, Croft, WA3 7DA 0.98 0.735 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3133 Land south of School Lane School Lane, Rixton, WA3 6HX 0.51 0.3825 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3137 306 Warrington Road Glazebury, WA3 5LB 0.54 0.405 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3138 Land off Hollins Lane Hollins Lane, Winwick, WA2 8SF 6.37 4.7775 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3139 Land adjacent ot Lymm Rugby Club Crouchley Lane, Lymm, WA13 0AN 8.33 6.2475 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3140 Land at Joy Lane Joy Lane, Burtonwood, WA5 4DF 13.57 10.1775 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3141 Land N of Longbutt Lane Longbutt Lane, Lymm, WA13 0QX 11.06 8.295 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3142 Land at Gullivers World Shackleton Close, Westbrook, WA5 9YZ 24.12 18.09 ConstrainedSite is considered suitable but development potential is currently constrained.
Site to be reviewed on an annual basis.
3143 Land east of Burford Lane Burford Lane, Lymm, WA13 0SJ 17.02 12.765 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3144 Land at Bradshaw Lane Bradshaw Lane, Lymm, WA13 9JW 14.68 11.01 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
3145 Cherry Hall Farm Cherry Lane, Lymm, WA13 0SY 26.26 19.695 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3146 Land south of Birchwood Train Station Moss Lane, Woolston, WA3 6EP 20.05 15.0375 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3147 Land south of Hatton Lane Hatton Lane, Hatton, WA4 4BZ 3.15 2.3625 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3151 Glazebury Depot Wilton Lane, Culcheth 20.04 15.03 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3152 Wider land north of Culcheth Wilton Lane, Culcheth 108.59 81.4425 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3153 The Tannery, Cherry Lane Cherry Lane, Lymm, WA13 0ST 0.59 0.4425 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3154 Land east of Heath Lane Heath Lane, Croft, WA3 7DJ 3.35 2.5125 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3155 Land at Heathercroft Stud Decons Close, Croft, WA3 7EN 3.51 2.6325 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3157 Land at Warrington Road Warrington Road, Culcheth, WA3 5AE 8.38 6.285 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3158 Land north of Stone Pit Lane Stone Pit Lane, Croft, WA3 7DS 8.2 6.15 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3159 Land south of Smithy Brow Smithy Brow, Croft, WA3 7DA 3.93 2.9475 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3160 Land east of Houghs Lane Houghs Lane, Walton, WA4 5LL 3.19 2.3925 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3161Land south of Westbourne Road and
west of Red LaneRed Lane, Appleton, WA4 5AB 16.64 12.48 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3162 Land at Mill Lane/Stage Lane Mill Lane, Lymm, WA13 9SQ 20.97 15.7275 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
3163 Land adjacent to Glazebrook Lane Glazebrook, WA3 5AX 23.01 17.2575 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3164 Land north of Higher Lane (A56) Higher Lane, Lymm, WA13 0RG 29.12 21.84 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3165 Land south of Lymm Road Grappenhall, WA4 2TP 3.87 2.9025 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3166 Land off Glazebrook Lane Glazebrook, WA3 5AX 4.45 3.3375 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3167 Stocks Lane Penketh, WA5 2RN 30.16 22.62 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3168 Land SE of Warrington Grappenhall 245.56 184.17 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3169 Land at Reddish Hall Farm Broad Lane, Grappenhall, WA4 3HS 31.35 23.5125 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3170 Land off High Legh Road High Legh Road, Lymm, WA13 0RT 0.66 0.495 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3171 Cotebrook Nursing Home Oughtrington Lane, Lymm, WA13 0QY 1.47 1.1025 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3172 Land off Hatton Lane (Site 1) Hatton Lane, Stretton, WA4 5PJ 4.5 3.375 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3173 Land off Hatton Lane (Site 2) Hatton Lane, Stretton, WA4 5PJ 20.06 15.045 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3175 Land west of Delph Farm Delph Lane, Winwick, WA2 8RW 15.53 11.6475 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3176Land N & S of Bank Street and
Glazebrook LaneGlazebrook, WA3 5BW 35.76 26.82 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3177 57 Camsley Lane Lymm, WA13 9BY 1.5 1.125 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
SHLAA Ref Site Name Site AddressGross Site
Area (Ha)
Net Developable
Site Area (Ha)
Concluding
RecommendationConcluding Comments
3178 Reddish Lane Lymm, WA13 9RP 7.17 5.3775 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
3179 Land south of Grappenhall Heys Broad Lane, Grappenhall 11.71 8.7825 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
15231Land off Lady Lane (Part covered by
1523/1608 and 2144)Croft, Warrington 13.47 10.10 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
15631 Land off Forrest Way Arpley Meadows 27.71 20.78 Constrained
Sites within the Green Belt, unless in compliance with the provisions of
appropriate development as defined by the NPPF, are considered unsuitable due
to policy constraints. In such circumstances, it is premature for the SHLAA to
endorse specific sites in the Green Belt as suitable for residential development in
advance of any comprehensive review of Warrington’s Green Belt to evaluate
whether there are appropriate locations for future development.
Appendix 3 - Density & Net Developable Area Testing
Appendix 3: Density and Net Developable Area ‐ Recent Development of SHLAA sites in Warrington (in excess of 10 dwellings)
SHLAA Ref
Site Ward GF or PDL
Gross Site Size (Ha)
Total Dwellings Gross Density (per Ha)
Net Site Size Equivalent to SHLAA Assessment (Ha)
Estimated Net Density based on SHLAA Assumption (per Ha)
Additional Information
121 New World Ltd, New World House, Thelwall Lane, Warrington, WA4 1NL
LE PDL 13.91 424 31 10.43 (75% scenario)
41 Gross site area includes large POS / SUDs and an existing social club which was retained, together with all internal roads, rear parking courts, etc. Development is a mix of detached, semi‐detached, mews houses and apartments.
538 Land off Sandy La, Oughtrington LYM PDL 0.25 14 56 0.25 (100% scenario)
56 Gross site area reflects curtilage of dwellings only. Development is three blocks of mews houses.
581 Brittannia Wire Works, Bewsey Road BWX PDL 8.00 341 43 6.00 (75% scenario)
57 Gross site area includes significant central POS and additional landscape buffer / greenway to railway line, together with all internal roads, rear parking courts, etc. Development is predominantly mews houses supplemented by detached and semi‐detached houses and apartments.
614 Land at Longbutt Lane/Oughtrington Lane, Lymm
LYM G 5.96 214 36 4.47 (75% scenario)
48 Gross site area includes significant POS to centre and western sections of site, plus sub‐station, all internal roads, rear parking courts, etc. Development is a mix of detached, semi‐detached and mews houses, supplemented by apartments.
1092 Farrell Street South F&H PDL 7.08 368 52 5.31 (75% scenario)
69 Gross site area includes POS, sub‐station, all internal roads, rear parking courts, etc. Development is a mix of detached, semi‐detached and mews houses, supplemented by apartments.
1211 Former Christadelphian Hall, Junction of Museum Street and Winmarleigh Street, Warrington
BWX PDL 0.06 20 333 0.06 (100% scenario)
333 Gross site area includes rear parking area only. Development is a conversion of an existing building to residential departments.
1249 George Howard Scrap Yard Ltd, 94 Folly Lane, Warrington, WA5 0NG
BWX PDL 1.33 80 60 1.20 (90% scenario)
67 Gross site area includes access roads and parking areas only. Development is a mix of semi‐detached and mews houses, supplemented by apartments.
1262 Land at Western end of Greenalls Avenue, Latchford, Warrington
LW PDL 0.67 45 67 0.60 (90% scenario)
75 Gross site area includes internal road and parking area only. Development comprises mews houses and an apartment block in a waterfront location.
1235 Marsden Vanplan Ltd, Longshaw Street, Warrington, WA5 0DF
BWX PDL 1.75 100 57 1.58 (90% scenario)
63 Gross site area includes internal road, parking areas, central POS area and sub‐station. Development is a mix of detached, semi‐detached, mews houses and apartments.
1328 Land at Deans Lane, Thelwall, Warrington, WA4 2TN
G&T PDL 1.04 10 10 0.94 (90% scenario)
11 Development is within the Green Belt and utilised the footprint of pre‐existing buildings which were demolished to consolidate the site and retain openness of the wider curtilage. These circumstances account for the low density of development, due to the limited developable area.
SHLAA Ref
Site Ward GF or PDL
Gross Site Size (Ha)
Total Dwellings Gross Density (per Ha)
Net Site Size Equivalent to SHLAA Assessment (Ha)
Estimated Net Density based on SHLAA Assumption (per Ha)
Additional Information
1411 Former timber planing mill off Chester Road, Lower Walton And Land To Immediate South Of, Landseer Avenue And, Cranborne Avenue, Warrington
LW PDL 9.73 250 26 7.30 (75% scenario)
34 Gross site area includes the creation of Watersmeet Linear Park ‐ approximately 6 ha of landscaping, watercourse and POS / TPT which does not form part of the developable area for residential (remaining 3.73 ha). Consequently the actual density of the net developable area is approximately 67 dph, inclusive of internal roads, parking areas and sub‐station. Development comprises a mix of detached, semi‐detached and mews houses, supplemented by apartments.
1424 Manor Lock, Junction Of Westy Lane / Grange Avenue, Warrington
LE PDL 0.21 18 86 0.21 (100% scenario)
86 Gross site area includes rear parking area and small amenity space only. Development comprises a block of mews houses, supplemented by apartments in the centre.
1439 Saxon Park East, Liverpool Road, WARRINGTON
BWX PDL 2.40 75 31 1.80 (75% scenario)
42 Gross site area includes landscaping / POS, internal access roads and retained through route to commercial premises. Development is in a waterfront location comprising a mix of semi‐detached and mews houses, together with apartment blocks.
1440 G & J Greenalls Site, South Of Loushers Lane, WARRINGTON
LW PDL 4.78 125 26 3.59 (75% scenario)
35 Gross site area includes landscaping / POS and internal access roads. Development is within an irregular shaped linear plot comprising predominantly detached houses, supplemented by a small pocket of semi‐detached and mews houses.
1451 Cantilever Gardens, Station Road, Warrington, WA4 2GU
LE PDL 0.20 14 70 0.20 (100% scenario)
70 Gross site area includes only a parking court. Development is within a narrow linear plot and comprises two detached dwellings and an apartment block.
1709 Land at Marsh House Lane, Marsh House Lane, Warrington, WA1 3QU
F&H PDL 1.79 108 60 1.61 (90% scenario)
67 Gross site area includes internal access roads and parking courts. Development is within an irregular wedge shaped plot and comprises a mix of semi‐detached and mews houses, together with an apartment block.
1792 Former HMS Gosling, Lady Lane, Croft, Warrington, WA3 7AY
CGC PDL 8.60 25 3 6.45 (75% scenario)
4 Development is within the Green Belt and utilised the footprint of pre‐existing buildings which were demolished to consolidate the site and retain openness of the wider curtilage. These circumstances account for the low density of development of detached houses and also due to the limited developable area (approximately 20% of the gross site area of 1.74 ha ‐ 14 dph) which includes internal roads, sub‐station, foul pumps and localised POS. Wider gross area of the site includes retention of existing woodland and creation of wildflower meadow and woodland walk through addition of footpaths, and a SUDs pond.
SHLAA Ref
Site Ward GF or PDL
Gross Site Size (Ha)
Total Dwellings Gross Density (per Ha)
Net Site Size Equivalent to SHLAA Assessment (Ha)
Estimated Net Density based on SHLAA Assumption (per Ha)
Additional Information
1814 Land adjoining the Farmers Arms, Rushgreen Road, Lymm, Warrington
LYM PDL 0.30 10 33 0.30 (100% scenario)
33 Gross site area includes internal access road and landscaping / POS fronting Rushgreen Road. Development comprises mews houses.
1864 Eagle Ottawa Warrington Ltd, Thelwall Lane, Warrington, WA4 1NQ
LE PDL 1.68 92 55 1.51 (90% scenario)
61 Gross site area includes internal access roads and substation. Development comprises predominantly mews houses, supplemented by two apartment blocks.
1877 Land to the rear of, Tesco Extra, Manchester Road, Warrington, WA1 3NJ
F&H PDL 0.30 12 40 0.30 (100% scenario)
40 Gross site area includes access road from Manchester Road to backland site, surface parking and accommodates watercourse on southern fringe. Development comprises two apartment blocks.
2005 106‐112, Church Lane, Culcheth, WARRINGTON, WA3 5DJ
CGC PDL 0.27 10 37 0.27 (100% scenario)
37 Gross site area includes internal access roads. Development comprises semi‐detached and mews houses.
2014 Hamnett Court, Birchwood, Warrington, WA3 7PN
BIR PDL 0.73 70 96 0.66 (90% scenario)
106 Gross site area includes access road and surface parking. Development comprises a conversion of existing building to apartment style development.
2148 Sealand Close, Fearnhead, Warrington, WA2 0US
PN PDL 0.42 10 24 0.38 (90% scenario)
26 Gross site area includes access road and landscaping. Development is within a linear cul‐de‐sac arrangement comprising large semi‐detached bungalows with irregular plot sizes due to site shape. Single storey nature of the dwellings results in a larger individual footprint thereby reducing the overall density.
2150 Land at the junction of Egerton Street / Farrell Street, Howley, Warrington
F&H PDL 0.22 23 105 0.22 (100% scenario)
105 Gross site area includes parking court and landscaped frontage. Development comprises mews houses and apartments.
2203 Booths Hill House, Booths Hill Close, Lymm, Warrington, WA13 0DW
LYM PDL 0.29 38 131 0.29 (100% scenario)
131 Gross site area includes parking court, landscaping and sub station. Development comprises apartments.
2254 56 Bewsey Street, Warrington, WA2 7JE BWX PDL 0.05 11 220 0.05 (100% scenario)
200 Gross site area reflects existing building and its curtilage only. Development comprises conversion of existing building to apartments.
2275 Former G&J Greenall Offices, China Lane/Wilderspool Causeway,Warrington,WA4 6PX
LW PDL 0.30 14 47 0.30 (100% scenario)
47 Gross site area includes parking court and landscaped area. Development comprises predominantly mews houses with a single semi‐detached pair of dwellings.
2410 10‐12, Winmarleigh Street, Bewsey and Whitecross, Warrington, WA1 1NB
BWX PDL 0.03 10 333 0.03 (100% scenario)
333 Gross site area reflects existing building and its curtilage only. Development comprises conversion of existing building to apartments.
SHLAA Ref
Site Ward GF or PDL
Gross Site Size (Ha)
Total Dwellings Gross Density (per Ha)
Net Site Size Equivalent to SHLAA Assessment (Ha)
Estimated Net Density based on SHLAA Assumption (per Ha)
Additional Information
2449 Land adjacent to Riversdale, Woolston R&W PDL 0.42 10 24 0.38 (90% scenario)
26 Gross site area includes access road and landscaping / POS. Development is within a broadly wedge shaped cul‐de‐sac arrangement comprising detached dwellings – narrow width of the northern section reduces the site density.
2453 The Hermit Inn, Golborne Road, Winwick, Warrington, WA2 8SN
B&W PDL 0.62 13 21 0.56 (90% scenario)
23 Gross site area includes access road in a cul‐de‐sac arrangement. Development is within a rectangular plot comprising large detached houses within varying size plots ‐ four properties at the back of the site have substantial rear gardens presumably due to the layout of the site.
2522 G & J Greenalls Site (Elderly Phase), South of Loushers Lane, Warrington
LW PDL 0.60 18 30 0.54 (90% scenario)
33 Gross site area includes an adjoining care home, access road, parking area and landscaping. Development is within a single apartment block.
2531 Former Horizon Centre, Loushers Lane, Warrington
LE PDL 0.50 15 30 0.45 (90% scenario)
33 Gross site area includes access road and small landscaped area to the frontage. Development comprises detached dwellings.
Chapelford – Strategic Site Analysis
SHLAA
Ref
Site Ward GF or
PDL
Total Dwellings Site Size (Ha) Net Developable Area Density (per Ha)
Additional Information
487.10 Phase 10a ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 89 0.52 171 Development of high density three and four bed dwellings ‐ site area includes access roads.
487.11 Phase 11 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 51 1.46 35 Development of standard density of range of detached and mews houses ‐ site area includes access roads.
487.12 Phase 12 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 68 1.90 36 Development of standard density of range of detached and mews houses – site area includes access roads, rear parking courts, fringe landscaping and small POS.
487.13 Phase 13a ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 39 1.18 33 Development of standard density of range of detached and mews houses – site area includes access roads, rear parking courts and fringe landscaping.
487.131 Phase 13b ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 74 1.52 49 Development of mix of apartments, detached and mews houses ‐ site area includes access roads, rear parking courts and sub‐station.
487.14 Phase 14 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 34 1.61 21 Development includes standard density of detached and mews houses, together with access roads, landscaping and POS, SUDs / pond and a watercourse.
487.16 Phase 16a ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 28 2.57 11 Development of medium and low density housing to fit a linear area on the boundary of the site. Site area includes access roads and part of the landscaping greenway for a main access road.
487.161 Phase 16b ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 56 2.51 22 Development of medium and low density housing to fit the boundary of the site. Site area includes access roads, part of the landscaping greenway for a main access road and small area of POS.
487.17 Phase 17 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 93 0.73 127 Development of apartments ‐ site area includes access road, landscaping and surface car parking.
487.18 Phase 18 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 38 0.37 103 Development of mix of apartments and mews houses, together with access roads, parking courts and sub‐station.
487F Phase 1 – Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 210 7.24 29 Development of mix of apartments, detached, semi‐detached and mews houses, together with access roads, parking courts, landscaping and multiple POS.
487K Phase 2 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 161 3.90 41 Development of mix of apartments, detached, semi‐detached and mews houses, together with access roads, parking courts, landscaping and multiple POS.
487D Phase 2a ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 76 1.74 44 Development of mix of apartments, detached and mews houses, together with access roads, parking courts, landscaping and POS.
487I Phase 2b ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 147 2.61 56 Development of mix of apartments and mews houses, together with access roads, parking courts, landscaping and POS.
487H Phase 3 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 79 2.96 27 Total site area (5.26 ha) includes two significant areas of public open space outside of the site and internal POS. Net developable area displayed is the 56% of the total area after this is removed, comprising a mix of detached and mews houses and access roads.
SHLAA
Ref
Site Ward GF or
PDL
Total Dwellings Site Size (Ha) Net Developable Area Density (per Ha)
Additional Information
487.4 Phase 4 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH
PDL 120 4.78 25 Development of a mix of detached, semi‐detached and mews houses. Site area includes access roads, parking courts, greenway landscaping and various POS.
487J Phase 5 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH
PDL 68 1.85 37 Development of apartments and detached houses. Site area includes access roads, rear parking courts, landscaping and POS.
487.6 Phase 6 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 127 5.46 23 Development of medium and low density housing to fit the boundary of the site. Site area includes access roads, rear parking courts, part of the landscaping greenway, significant POS and a health centre.
487.7 Phase 7 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 71 2.30 31 Development includes standard density of detached, semi‐detached and mews houses, together with access roads, rear parking courts, landscaping and multiple areas of POS.
487.8 Phase 8a ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 123 4.90 25 Development includes standard density of detached, semi‐detached and mews houses, together with access roads, rear parking courts, landscaping and multiple areas of POS.
487.81 Phase 8b ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 71 1.70 42 Development includes a mix of detached and mews houses. Site area includes access roads, rear parking courts and POS.
487.9 Phase 9a ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 45 1.22 37 Development includes a mix of detached, semi‐detached and mews houses. Site area includes access roads, rear parking courts and POS.
487.91 Phase 9b ‐ Chapelford Urban Village WH PDL 57 1.70
34 Development includes a mix of detached and mews houses. Site area includes access roads and rear parking courts.
1925 56.73 34
Hectares %
Gross site area 98.50
Net developable area (including remaining undeveloped plot of 6.88 Ha) 63.61 65
Infrastructure ‐ strategic POS, landscaping, arterial highways, village centre, rail station, etc 34.89 35
Appendix 4 Build Rates Analysis
Appendix 4: Warrington Annual Average Build Rate Analysis
Year
Completions within sites
with capacity of
20‐50 homes
Number of sites
Average Build Rate by Year (Sites 20 ‐ 50 homes)
Completions within sites
with capacity of 50‐150 homes
Number of sites
Average Build Rate by Year (Sites 50‐
150 homes)
Completions within sites
with capacity of over 150 homes
Number of sites
Average Build Rate by Year
(Sites over 150
homes)
2003/04 36 3 12 465 14 33 56 3 19
2004/05 185 6 31 409 11 37 317 4 79
2005/06 153 5 31 492 14 35 512 8 64
2006/07 161 5 32 278 8 35 843 11 77
2007/08 232 8 29 397 10 40 920 11 84
2008/09 24 3 8 233 6 39 300 7 43
2009/10 38 2 19 97 5 19 195 5 39
2010/11 38 3 13 206 8 26 242 5 48
2011/12 76 4 19 250 10 25 216 5 43
2012/13 97 4 24 313 10 31 190 4 48
2013/14 69 6 12 355 10 36 156 3 52
2014/15 50 4 13 162 5 32 320 5 64
2015/16 70 4 18 161 5 32 279 5 56
2016/17 32 2 16 185 4 46 138 4 35
Total 1261 59 4003 120 4684 80
Average build rate (2003/04 ‐ 2016/17)
21.16
35.89
57.65
Appendix 5 - Sample Sites Lead-In Times
Appendix 5 – Sample Site Lead‐in Times
Permission Type
SHLAA Ref
Application Ref
Site Ward GF or PDL
Site Size (Ha)
TotalDwellings
Gross Density (per Ha)
Month PA Received
Lead in to 1st
Completion (PA Received)
Month PP Granted
Lead in to 1st Completion (PP Granted)
Total Duration to Complete (From PA Received)
Landowner / Developer
FP 261 2013/22269 KW8 N Tourney Green WB PDL 2.78 99 36 Aug‐13 1 year 3 months (Dec‐14)
Nov‐13 1 year 1 month (Dec‐14)
3 years 5 months (Aug‐13 to Jan 2017)
HCA / Miller Homes
FP 487.12 2010/16997 Phase 12 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village
WH PDL 1.90 68 36 Aug‐10 1 year 9 months (May 12)
Oct‐10 1 year 7 months (May‐12)
3 years 3 months (Aug‐10 to Dec‐13)
Barratt Homes
RM 487.131 2012/20461 Phase 13b ‐ Chapelford Urban Village
WH PDL 1.50 74 49 Aug‐12 9 months (May 13)
Sept‐12 8 months (May‐13)
2 years 2 months (Aug‐12 to Jun‐14)
David Wilson Homes
RM 487.17 2012/19851 Phase 17 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village
WH PDL 0.94 93 98 Apr‐12 4 months (Aug‐12)
May‐12 3 months (Aug‐12)
3 years (Apr‐12 to Apr‐15)
David Wilson Homes
RM 487.19 2013/21762 Phase 19, Chapelford Urban Village
WH PDL 0.81 17 21 May‐13 1 year 7 months (Dec‐14)
Jun‐13 1 year 6 months (Dec‐14)
1 years 10 months (May‐13 to Mar‐15)
David Wilson Homes
OUT RM
1092 2003/00831 & 2009/15420
Farrell Street South F&H PDL 7.08 315 44 Jul‐03 (OUT) Oct‐09 (RM)
OUT ‐ 8 years 5 months (Dec‐11) RM ‐ 2 years 2 months (Dec‐11)
Nov‐06 (OUT) Jan‐10 (RM)
OUT ‐ 5 years 1 month (Dec‐11) RM ‐ 1 year 11 months (Dec‐11)
OUT ‐ 12 years 6 months (Jul‐03 to Jan‐16) RM ‐ 6 years 3 months (Jul‐03 to Jan‐16)
Persimmon Homes
OUT RM
1201 2004/02824 & 2007/11944
New World Ltd, New World House, Thelwall Lane, Warrington, WA4 1NL
LE PDL 13.91 424 30 Apr‐04 (OUT) Nov‐07 (RM)
OUT ‐ 4 years 8 months (Dec‐08) RM ‐ 1 year 1 month (Dec‐08)
Jul‐05 (OUT) Apr‐08 (RM)
OUT ‐ 3 years 5 months (Dec‐08) RM ‐ 8 months (Dec‐08)
Not yet complete
Morris Homes
FP 1249 2011/17700 George Howard Scrap Yard Ltd, 94 Folly Lane, Warrington, WA5 0NG
B&W PDL 1.33 80 60 Feb‐11 3 years 2 months (Apr‐14)
Apr‐11 3 years (Apr‐14)
4 years 1 month (Feb‐11 to Mar‐15)
Harbour Construction
FP 1262 2010/16177 Land at Western end of Greenalls Avenue, Latchford, WA4 6RJ
LW PDL 0.67 45 67 Mar‐10 4 years 4 months (Jul‐14)
Sept‐11 2 years 10 months (Jul‐14)
4 years 4 months (Mar‐10 to Jul‐14)
Cruden Construction
Permission Type
SHLAA Ref
Application Ref
Site Ward GF or PDL
Site Size (Ha)
TotalDwellings
Gross Density (per Ha)
Month PA Received
Lead in to 1st
Completion (PA Received)
Month PP Granted
Lead in to 1st Completion (PP Granted)
Total Duration to Complete (From PA Received)
Landowner / Developer
OUT RM
1411 2007/10646 & 2008/13785 & 2012/19970
Former Timber Mill, Off Chester Road (Walton Locks), Landseer Ave and Cranborne Ave, Lower Walton, WA4 6ES
B&W PDL 9.73 257 26 Jul‐07 (OUT) Oct‐08 (RM)
3 years (Jul‐10) 1 years 9 months (Jul‐10)
Sept‐07 (OUT) Jan‐09 (RM)
2 years 10 months (Jul‐10) 1 years 6 months (Jul‐10)
OUT ‐ 9 years 3 months (Jul‐07 to Oct‐16) RM ‐ 8 years (Oct‐08 to Oct‐16)
David Wilson Homes
FP 1424 2009/14932 Manor Lock, Junction of Westy Lane / Grange Avenue, Westy, WA4 1QJ
LE PDL 0.21 18 86 Jul‐09 2 years 11 months (Jun‐12)
Oct‐09 2 years 8 months (Jun‐12)
4 years 5 months (Jul‐09 to Dec‐13)
Muir Group
OUT RM
1440 2007/12085 & 2010/17151
G & J Greenalls Site, South Of Loushers Lane, Stockon Heath, WA4 6RX
LW PDL 4.78 245 51 Dec‐07 (OUT) Oct‐10 (RM)
OUT ‐ 4 years 10 months (Oct‐12) RM ‐ 2 years (Oct‐12)
Feb‐08 (OUT) Jan‐11 (RM)
OUT ‐ 4 years 8 months (Oct‐12) RM ‐ 1 year 9 months (Oct‐12)
OUT ‐ 7 years 7 months (Dec‐07 to Jul‐15) RM ‐ 2 years 9 months (Oct‐10 to Jul‐15)
Bellway Homes
OUT RM
1643 2011/19313 &
2013/22541
Bruche former Police Training Centre, Off Greenway
PS PDL 8.81 220 25 Dec‐11 (OUT) Sept‐13 (RM)
OUT ‐ 3 years (Dec‐14) RM ‐ 1 year 2 months (Dec‐14)
Jul‐13 (OUT) Dec‐13 (RM)
OUT ‐ 1 year 4 months (Dec‐14) RM ‐ 1 year (Dec‐14)
Not yet complete
Morris Homes
FP 1709 2012/21007 Land at Marsh House Lane, Marsh House Lane, Warrington, WA1 3QU
F&H PDL 1.79 108 60 Dec‐12 8 months (Sept‐13)
Mar‐13 6 months (Sept‐13)
1 year 3 months (Dec‐12 to Mar‐14)
Countryside Properties
FP 1711 2015/25136 Land at Church Street and Farrell Street, Warrington, WA1 2LD
F&H PDL 1.56 106 68 Jan‐15 9 months (Oct‐15)
Mar‐15 7 months (Oct‐15)
1 year 9 months (Jan‐15 to Oct‐16)
Countryside Properties
FP 1756 (2816)
2012/20529 Land off Marsden Avenue, Latchford, WA4 1UB
LE PDL 3.45 104 30 Aug‐12 3 years 5 months (Jan‐16)
Apr‐15 9 months (Jan‐16)
Not yet complete
Local Developer
FP 1790 2014/24838 97 Buttermarket St, Warrington, WA1 2NL
B&W PDL 0.07 10 143 Nov‐14 2 year 4 months (Mar‐17)
Feb‐15 2 year 1 months (Mar‐17)
2 years 4 months (Nov‐14 to Mar‐17)
Local Developer
FP 1814 2011/18631 Land adjoining the Farmers Arms, Rushgreen Road, Lymm, WA13 9RD
LYM PDL 0.30 10 33 Jul‐11 1 year 9 months (Apr‐13)
Feb‐12 1 year 2 months (Apr‐13)
2 years (Jul‐11 to Jul‐13)
Harbour Construction
Permission Type
SHLAA Ref
Application Ref
Site Ward GF or PDL
Site Size (Ha)
TotalDwellings
Gross Density (per Ha)
Month PA Received
Lead in to 1st
Completion (PA Received)
Month PP Granted
Lead in to 1st Completion (PP Granted)
Total Duration to Complete (From PA Received)
Landowner / Developer
OUT RM
1825 2013/22322 &
2014/24762
Gemini 16, Land to the South of Westbrook Crescent, Warrington, WA5 8WD
WB PDL 5.4 118 22 Aug‐13 (OUT) Nov‐14 (RM)
OUT ‐ 2 years 5 months (Jan‐16) RM ‐ 1 year 2 months (Jan‐16)
Nov‐13 (OUT) Feb‐15 (RM)
OUT ‐ 2 years 2 months (Jan‐16) RM – 11 months (Jan‐16)
Not yet complete
Bloor Homes
FP 2150 2011/18876 Land at junction of Egerton St /Farrell St, Howley, WA1 2EL
F&H PDL 0.22 23 105 Sept‐11 1 year 8 months (May‐13)
Dec‐11 1 year 5 months (May‐13)
2 years 1 month (Sept‐11 to Oct‐13)
Muir Group
FP 2164 2012/20578 Grappenhall Independent Methodist Church, Barton Avenue, Stockton Heath, WA4 2LE
SH PDL 0.13 2 15 Aug‐12 1 year 3 months (Dec‐13)
Jan‐13 11 months (Dec‐13)
1 year 3 months (Aug‐12 to Dec‐13)
Local Developer
FP 2275 2011/18845 Former G&J Greenall Offices, China Lane/Wilderspool Causeway, Stockton Heath, WA4 6PX
LW PDL 0.30 14 46 Sept‐11 1 year 10 months (Jul‐13)
Jul‐12 1 year (Jul‐13)
2 years 6 months (Sept‐11 to Mar‐14)
Bellway Homes
FP 2449 2012/20626 Land adjacent to Riversdale, Woolston, WA1 4FT
R&W PDL 0.50 10 11 Sept‐12 1 year 7 months (Mar‐14)
Mar‐13 1 year (Mar‐14)
1 year 10 months (Sept‐12 to Jul‐14)
David Wilson Homes
FP 2453 2012/20808 The Hermit Inn, Golborne Road, Winwick, Warrington, WA2 8SN
B&W PDL 0.62 13 21 Oct‐12 1 year 7 months (May‐14)
Jul‐13 10 months (May‐14)
2 years 4 months (Oct‐12 to Feb‐15)
Bloor Homes
FP 2531 2013/22398 Former Horizon Centre, Loushers Lane, Latchford, WA4 2RF
LE PDL 0.50 15 30 Sept‐13 1 year 5 months (Feb‐15)
Dec‐13 1 year 2 months (Feb‐15)
1 year 7 months (Sept‐13 to Apr‐15)
Bellway Homes
FP 2538 2013/22047 Fourways, Twiss Green Lane, Culcheth, WA3 4HX
CGC PDL 0.16 7 44 Jun‐13 1 year 10 months (Apr‐15)
Sept‐13 1 year 7 months (Apr‐15)
1 year 10 months (Jun‐13 to May‐15)
Local Developer
FP 2544 2012/20617 70 Clarence Road, Grappenhall, Warrington, WA4 2PQ
G&T PDL 0.04 2 50 Sep‐12 2 years 7 months (Apr‐15)
Aug‐13 (On Appeal)
1 year 8 months (Apr‐15)
2 years 7 months (Sep‐12 to Apr‐15)
Local Developer
FP 2619 2014/23673 35‐37, Wilson Patten Street, Warrington, WA1 1PG
B&W PDL 0.02 12 600 Apr‐14 1 year 5 months (Sept‐15)
Aug‐14 1 year 1 month (Sept‐15)
1 year 5 months (Apr‐14 to Sept‐15)
Local Developer
Permission Type
SHLAA Ref
Application Ref
Site Ward GF or PDL
Site Size (Ha)
TotalDwellings
Gross Density (per Ha)
Month PA Received
Lead in to 1st
Completion (PA Received)
Month PP Granted
Lead in to 1st Completion (PP Granted)
Total Duration to Complete (From PA Received)
Landowner / Developer
FP 2621 2014/23879 47A Belmont Avenue, Latchford, WA4 1LY
LE PDL 0.02 2 100 May‐14 10 months (Mar‐15)
Aug‐14 7 months (Mar‐15)
7 months (May‐14 to Mar‐15)
Local Developer
FP 2655 2014/23050 Quadrant House, Church Street, Warrington, WA1 2ST
F&H PDL 0.16 16 100 Feb‐14 2 years 7 months (Sept‐16)
Apr‐14 2 years 5 months (Sept 2016)
2 years 5 months (Sept 2016)
Local Developer
PA 2661 2015/25049 Empire Court, Museum Street, WA1 1HU
B&W PDL 0.13 15 115 Jan‐15 1 year 6 months (Jul‐16)
Feb‐15 1 year 5 months (Jul‐16
1 year 5 months (Jul‐16
Local Developer
Appendix 6 - Housing Completions 2016-2017
Appendix 6 ‐ Housing Completions 2016 to 2017
SHLAA Ref Site Details Ward Site Area (Ha)Application
ReferenceGF/PDL Net Capacity
Number of
completions to
date
Number of units
under
construction
Number of units
not yet started2016/17 Form of completion
261 Kw8 N Tourney Green Westbrook 2.78 2013/22269 PDL 99 99 0 0 28 New Build
487.14 Phase 14 ‐ Chapelford Urban Village Chapelford & Old Hall 2.23 2012/19855 PDL 36 36 0 0 5 New Build
487.15 Phase 15, Chapelford Urban Village, Great Sankey, Warrington, Wa5 3Sr Chapelford & Old Hall 5.70 2013/22223 PDL 190 190 0 0 25 New Build
1201 New World Ltd, New World House, Thelwall Lane, Warrington, Wa4 1Nl Latchford East 13.91 2007/11944 PDL 482 455 0 27 21 New Build
1411 Former Timber Planing Mill Off Chester Road, Lower Walton And Land To Immediate South Of Landseer Avenue And Cranborne Avenue, Warrington Bewsey & Whitecross 9.73 2008/13785 PDL 257 257 0 0 23 New Build
1415 Aston Berkeley Systems Ltd, Berkeley House, Whitbarrow Road, Lymm, Wa139Ar Lymm North & Thelwall 0.08 2010/16343 PDL 5 5 0 0 5 Change of Use
1443 (Rear Plot), 169, Warrington Road, Penketh, Warrington, Wa5 2En Penketh & Cuerdley 0.08 2008/12171 PDL 2 2 0 0 2 New Build
1448 16, Hob Hey Lane, Culcheth, Warrington, Wa3 4Nq Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 0.16 2012/20774 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
1507 Land Between 53 And 67, Hob Hey Lane, Warrington, Wa3 4Nr Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 0.26 2013/21670 PDL 3 3 0 0 3 New Build
1510 The Bridge House, Stockport Road, Grappenhall And Thelwall, Warrington, Wa4 2Sz Lymm North & Thelwall 0.17 2015/25758 PDL 4 4 0 0 4 New Build
1517 Former Ship Inn And Adjoining Land, Chester Road, Walton, Warrington, Wa4 6En Stockton Heath 1.36 2014/23334 PDL 14 13 1 0 13 New Build
1634 Agricultural Building Off Spring Lane, Croft, Warrington, Wa3 7As Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 2.38 2015/26747 GF 1 1 0 0 1 Change of Use
1643 Police Training Centre, Greenway, Poulton‐With‐Fearnhead, Warrington, Wa1 3Eg Poulton South 8.75 2011/19313 PDL 220 157 6 57 69 New Build
1711 Land At Church Street And Farrell Street, Warrington Fairfield & Howley 1.56 2015/25136 PDL 106 106 0 0 64 New Build
1756 Land Off Marsden Avenue, Latchford, Warrington, Wa4 1Ub Latchford East 3.4 2012/20529 PDL 104 47 57 0 47 New Build
1790 97, Buttermarket Street, Bewsey & Whitecross, Warrington Bewsey & Whitecross 0.01 2014/24838 PDL 10 10 0 0 10 Change of Use
1825 Gemini 16, Land To The South Of Westbrook Crescent, Warrington Westbrook 5.50 2013/22322 PDL 118 58 12 48 46 New Build
1862 120, Heath Road, Warrington, Wa5 2Db Penketh & Cuerdley 0.15 2013/22275 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
1881 Vacant Land Adjacent To 49 & 51, Orford Green , Warrington, Cheshire, Wa2 8Pj Orford 0.04 2013/22641 PDL 2 1 1 0 1 New Build
2030 Land Between The Methodist Church And 280 Warrington Road, Glazebury, Warrington, Wa3 5Lg Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 0.13 2008/13146 PDL 5 1 0 4 1 New Build
2206 Land Adj 154 Capesthorne Road, Orford, Warrington, Wa2 0Jd Poplars & Hulme 0.04 2013/22021 PDL 2 2 0 0 2 New Build
2415 Laburnum Farm, Laburnham Lane, Penketh, Warrington, Wa5 3Le Penketh & Cuerdley 0.19 2012/20454 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2492 Land Adj To The Bridge House, Stockport Road, Grappenhall & Thelwall, Warrington, Wa4 2Sz Lymm North & Thelwall 0.62 2014/24149 GF 4 4 0 0 4 New Build
2509 56A, Higher Lane, Lymm, Warrington, Wa13 0Bg Lymm South 0.22 2013/21172 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2552 12, Hob Hey Lane, Culcheth And Glazebury, Warrington, Wa3 4Nq Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 0.10 2013/22698 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2580 The Rhinewood Country House Hotel, Glazebrook Lane, Warrrington, Wa3 5Bb Rixton & Woolston 1.00 2014/24573 PDL 36 27 9 0 27 New Build
2609 Land To The Rear Of 18, Booths Lane, Lymm, Warrington, Wa13 0Pe Lymm South 0.01 2014/23425 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2611 33‐35, Birchbrook Road, Lymm, Warrington, Wa13 9Sa Lymm North & Thelwall 0.23 2014/23512 PDL 2 1 0 1 1 New Build
2615 Barn Adj To 57 Cherry Lane, Lymm, Warrington, Wa13 0Nu Lymm South 0.28 2013/22675 GF 4 4 0 0 4 Change of Use
2616 68, Wash Lane, Latchford, Warrington, Wa4 1Jd Latchford East 0.14 2014/23853 PDL 4 4 0 0 4 New Build
2636 172 , Padgate Lane, Warrington, Wa1 3Sp Fairfield & Howley 0.02 2014/24547 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2637 35, Station Road, Poulton‐With‐Fearnhead, Warrington, Wa2 0Pd Poulton North 0.46 2014/24555 PDL 2 2 0 0 2 New Build
2639 Hatton Hall, Warrington Road, Hatton, Warrington, Wa4 5Nu Appleton 0.05 2014/24589 GF 2 2 0 0 2 New Build
2642 The Railway Hotel, Mill Lane, Lymm, Warrington, Wa13 9Sq Lymm North & Thelwall 0.93 2014/24849 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2649 27 & 29, Bold Street, Warrington, Wa1 1Hq Bewsey & Whitecross 0.01 2014/24929 PDL 8 8 0 0 8 New Build
2650 46, Barsbank Lane, Lymm, Warrington, Cheshire, Wa13 9Nf Lymm North & Thelwall 0.01 2014/24961 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2654 Warrington Borough Council, 320, Manchester Road, Woolston, Warrington, Wa1 4Pu Rixton & Woolston 0.14 2013/21358 PDL 3 2 1 0 2 New Build
2655 Quadrant House, Church Street, Fairfield And Howley, Warrington, Wa1 2St Fairfield & Howley 0.16 2014/23050 PDL 16 16 0 0 16 Change of Use
2661 Empire Court, Museum Street Bewsey & Whitecross 0.13 2015/25049 PDL 15 15 0 0 15 Change of Use
2665 2‐8 Henry Street Bewsey & Whitecross 0.02 2013/22683 PDL 4 4 0 0 4 New Build
2703 Chapel House Farm, Fowley Common Lane, Culcheth And Glazebury, Warrington, Wa3 5Jn Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 0.04 2014/24665 GF 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2800 44 Bewsey Street, Warrington, Bewsey & Whitecross 0.01 2015/25716 PDL 2 2 0 0 2 New Build
2826 14 , Delphfields Road, Appleton, Warrington, Wa4 5By Appleton 0.12 2015/25326 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2833 Land Adjoining 67 School Lane, Hollins Green, Warrington, Wa3 6Ln Rixton & Woolston 0.04 2015/25560 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2835 13‐17 Sankey Street Warrington Bewsey & Whitecross 0.03 2014/25022 PDL 6 6 0 0 6 Change of Use
2842 4, Beechwood Lane, Culcheth And Glazebury, Warrington, Wa3 4Hj Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 0.2 2015/26082 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2847 Land Between 12 & 16, Raymond Avenue, Stockton Heath, Warrington Stockton Heath 0.02 2015/26113 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2848 2, Claremont Road, Culcheth And Glazebury, Warrington, Wa3 4Nt Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 0.08 2015/26278 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2850 2, Gerosa Avenue, Winwick, Warrington, Wa2 8Sr Burtonwood & Winwick 0.03 2015/26299 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2857 Former St Anselm Rc Church, Hawleys Lane, Warrington, Wa5 0Ej Bewsey & Whitecross 0.32 2015/25925 PDL 16 16 0 0 16 New Build
2866 40, Orford Green, Orford, Warrington, Wa2 8Pl Orford 0.02 2015/26840 PDL 2 2 0 0 2 New Build
2869 Chapel Brow Farm, Liverpool Road, Great Sankey, Warrington, Wa5 1Re Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall 0.23 2015/26921 PDL 5 3 2 0 3 New Build
2870 St Benedicts Convent, Bruche Avenue, Poulton‐With‐Fearnhead, Warrington, Wa1 3Jq Poulton South 0.18 2015/27137 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
2875 42, Ridley Drive, Great Sankey, Warrington, Wa5 1Hp Great Sankey South 0.05 2015/27049 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
3002 3‐5, Smithy Brow, Croft, Warrington, Wa3 7Da Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 0.06 2016/27624 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
3018 238, HIGHER LANE, LYMM, WARRINGTON, WA13 0RJ Lymm South 0.12 2016/28611 PDL 1 1 0 0 1 New Build
3022 St Austins Chambers, St Austins Lane, Warrington, Wa1 1Hg Bewsey & Whitecross 0.03 2016/27766 PDL 11 11 0 0 11 Change of Use
3029 128, SLATER STREET, LATCHFORD, WARRINGTON, WA4 1DW Latchford West 0.03 2016/28474 PDL 2 2 0 0 2 New Build
521
Planning Policy & ProgrammesWarrington Borough Council
New Town HouseButtermarket Street
WarringtonWA1 2NH
Tel: 01925 442826Email: [email protected]