Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) · Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase

Prepared by Inspections Plus, Inc. 505-344-9410 or 505-489-5077 WWW.INSPECTIONSPLUSINC.COM

Sto

rm W

ater

Pol

luti

on P

reve

nti

on P

lan

S

outh

ern

San

dov

al C

oun

ty A

rroy

o F

lood

Con

trol

Au

thor

ity

Har

vey

Jon

es C

han

nel

Im

pro

vem

ents

Ph

ase

2 , C

orra

les,

New

Mex

ico,

S

and

oval

Cou

nty

Prepared by Inspections Plus, Inc. 505-344-9410 or 505-489-5077 WWW.INSPECTIONSPLUSINC.COM

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)

Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority

Site

Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2

Certification Page For Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2

Certification of this SWPPP

Certification of Historic Preservation Sites The list of sites registered with the National Register of Historic Places

is attached. A review of the site found no evidence that this project will have an adverse impact on any historic site listed on the National Register of Historic Sites.

Certification of Endangered Species The list of possible threatened and endangered species is attached. A

review of the site found no evidence that this project will have an adverse impact on any listed threatened or endangered plant or animal species other than as noted in Section 4.0.

“I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted, is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.”

Owner’s Certification

Signature: _____________________________ Date: __________________________________

Printed Name: _________________________ Title: ___________________________________

Company:Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority

Project: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2

Operator’s Certification

Signature: _____________________________ Date: __________________________________


Company: Project: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2

Operator’s Certification

Signature: _____________________________ Date: __________________________________


Company:_____________________________ Project: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2

Ver. 01-14-13 1

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan

For

Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority

Site

Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2

City of Corrales Sandoval County, New Mexico

Date of Plan 9/8/2014

Ver. 01-14-13 2

SWPPP Index

Storm Water.......................................................................................................................................... 1

Limitations on Coverage...................................................................................................................... 4

Permitting Procedure and Requirements............................................................................................ 4

Signatory Requirements....................................................................................................................... 4

Stormwater Team ................................................................................................................................. 5

Staff Training Requirements ............................................................................................................... 5

General Information............................................................................................................................ 6

If Construction Activities Cease .......................................................................................................... 6

Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat Protection.............................................. 7

Steps to Determine the Correct Criteria .............................................................................................. 7

Site Information ................................................................................................................................... 8

Site Information Continued..........................................................................................................................9

Receiving Waters................................................................................................................................ 10

Historic Properties ............................................................................................................................. 10

On-site and Off-site Support Activities For The Project .................................................................. 11

Allowable Non-Storm Water Discharges .......................................................................................... 12

Who must obtain a permit (authorization) for discharges of storm water from construction activity?............................................................................................................................................... 14

Operator – In charge of plans and specs .......................................................................................... 14

Operator(s) – In charge of day to day activity................................................................................... 14

Operator – In charge of plans and specs .......................................................................................... 15

Operator(s) – In charge of day to day activity................................................................................... 16

Nature of Construction Activity......................................................................................................... 17

Sequence of major soil disturbing activities...................................................................................... 17

Identify all Potential Sources of Pollution........................................................................................ 18

BMP controls and installation phasing to reduce pollutants........................................................... 20

Structural Practices............................................................................................................................ 21

Best Management Practices (BMP) Check List................................................................................ 22

BMP Maintenance ............................................................................................................................. 23

Solid Waste management Procedures ............................................................................................... 24

Off Site Track-out Management........................................................................................................ 24

Hazardous Waste Management Procedures ..................................................................................... 25

List of Hazardous Materials kept on site...................................................................................................25

Spill Response Procedures................................................................................................................. 26

Ver. 01-14-13 3

Deadlines for Initiating Stabilization................................................................................................ 27

Earth-disturbing activities have permanently ceased when clearing and excavation within any area of your construction site that will not include permanent structures has been completed...................27

Deadline to complete stabilization..............................................................................................................27

Exceptions to the deadline ..........................................................................................................................27

Interim Stabilization .......................................................................................................................... 28

Permanent Stabilization..................................................................................................................... 28

Permanent Stabilization Continued...........................................................................................................29

Maintaining an Updated Plan ........................................................................................................... 30

Inspections.......................................................................................................................................... 30

Inspections Continued.................................................................................................................................31

Applicable State, Tribal, or Local Programs .................................................................................... 32

Disclaimer........................................................................................................................................... 32

Jobsite Chemical Inventory ............................................................................................................... 33

Ver. 01-14-13 4

Limitations on Coverage 1. The purpose of this SWPPP is to address storm water discharges that originate at this site,

including any temporary support activity from the commencement of construction activities to the point of final stabilization as defined in the CGP. Post-construction storm water discharges are not eligible for coverage under this permit or addressed in this SWPPP.

2. There will be no non-storm water discharges from this site other than those identified in Section 1.3 in the CGP

3. EPA has not made a determination that a discharge from this site will cause or have reasonable potential to cause violations of water quality standards. If notified of such potential by EPA an individual permit will be applied for or appropriated controls and procedures will be implemented to bring the project into compliance with water quality standards.

Permitting Procedure and Requirements Step 1: File for Notice of Intent (NOI)

File online http://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp . Permittee must file prior to commencement of construction activities. You are authorized to discharge storm water from this project under the terms an conditions of the NPDES General Permit fourteen (14) calendar days after acknowledgement of your complete Notice of Intent (NOI) is posted on the EPA’s NPDES website

Signatory Requirements

Who must file for permit coverage

Who Delegation of Authority

Responsible corporate officer (President, Vice-President, Secretary or Treasure

Corporate Resolutions Corporation

General Manager of a manufacturing plant.

Provided he has been delegated that authority in writing and meets requirements outlined in Appendix G Section 11.A.1

Partnership or Sole Proprietorship General partner or Proprietor

None Needed

Municipality, State, Federal or other Public agency

Principal Executive Officer or Ranking Elected Official

None Needed

Note: Delegation of Authority must be done in writing and a copy kept with the SWPPP. A copy must be submitted to EPA if requested.

Ver. 01-14-13 5

Stormwater Team Name Company Responsibility

Jeff Hartman

Inspections Plus, Inc. Identify needed corrective actions during the bi-weekly or monthly inspection.

Clean up leaks and spills. Make sure BMP’s get repaired, modified or replaced.

Staff Training Requirements Personnel who are responsible for the design, installation, maintenance, and/or repair of stormwater

controls (including pollution prevention measures); Personnel responsible for the application and storage of treatment chemicals (if applicable); Personnel who are responsible for conducting inspections as required in Part 4.1.1;and Personnel who are responsible for taking corrective actions as required in Part 5. You are not required to provide or document formal training for subcontractors or other outside

service providers, but you must ensure that such personnel understand any requirements of the permit that may be affected by the work they are subcontracted to perform. At a minimum, personnel must be trained to understand the following:

The location of all stormwater controls on the site required by this permit, and how they are to be maintained;

The proper procedures to follow with respect to the permit’s pollution prevention requirements; and

When and how to conduct inspections, record applicable findings, and take corrective actions.

Ver. 01-14-13 6

General Information SWPPP Availability

A copy of the SWPPP (including a copy of the permit), NOI, and acknowledgement letter from EPA must be retained at the construction site (or other location easily accessible during normal business hours.)

NOI You must post a sign or other notice conspicuously at a safe, publicly accessible location in close proximity to the project site. At a minimum, the notice must include the NPDES Permit tracking number and a contact name and phone number for obtaining additional project information. The notice must be located so that it is visible from the public road that is nearest to the active part of the construction site, and it must use a font large enough to be readily viewed from a public right-of-way.

Prohibited Discharges

1) Wastewater from washout of concrete, unless managed by an appropriate control as described in Part 2.3.3.4; 2) Wastewater from washout and cleanout of stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials, unless managed by an appropriate control as described in Part 2.3.3.4; 3) Fuels, oils, or other pollutants used in vehicle and equipment operation and maintenance; 4) Soaps, solvents, or detergents used in vehicle and equipment washing; and 5) Toxic or hazardous substances from a spill or other release.

Washouts Washout pits must be lined. Concrete, stucco and painters MUST use the washout. Only water based paints are allowed in the washout. Waste from oil based paints/thinners must be in containers designed to for them and then properly disposed of.

Stabilization chemicals

No cationic chemicals can be used for dust suppression. Eg PAM, polymers, etc

Stabilization schedule

Stabilization must be initiated no later than 14 days after permanent or temporary cessation of construction activity on a portion of the site or of the entire site.

Projects next to surface waters

You must leave a 50 foot buffer zone or create a sediment reduction equivalent if your construction area is next to surface waters as defined in appendix A.

If Construction Activities Cease Except as provided below, stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as practicable in portions of the site where construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. 1 Where stabilization by the 14th day is precluded by snow cover or frozen ground conditions, stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as practicable. 2 Where construction activity on a portion of the site is temporarily ceased, and earth disturbing activities will be resumed within 14 days, temporary stabilization measures do not have to be initiated on that portion of the site. 3 In arid, semiarid, and drought-stricken areas where initiating perennial vegetative stabilization measures is not possible within 14 days after construction activity has temporarily or permanently ceased, final vegetative stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as practicable.

Ver. 01-14-13 7

Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat Protection

For purposes of Appendix D of the CGP Endangered Species Act Review Procedures – this project is determined to be eligible for coverage using criteria E. See the determination made in the SWPPP for phase 1 of this project.

Steps to Determine the Correct Criteria Step 1: Conditions for your criteria selection Determine if Your Discharges and Discharge-Related Activities Were Already Addressed in Another Operator’s Valid Certification that Included Your Action Area . If YES choose option B.

By certifying eligibility under Criterion B, you must comply with any terms and conditions imposed under the eligibility requirements of Criterion A, C, D, E, or F and you must comply with any terms and conditions imposed under the eligibility requirements of Criterion A, C, D, E, or F.

Step 2: Determine if Listed Threatened or Endangered Species or their Designated Critical Habitat(s) are Likely to Occur in your Site’s Action Area If NO choose option A If YES continue to step 3

You must determine, to the best of your knowledge, whether species listed as either threatened or endangered, or their critical habitat(s) are located in your site’s action area. See CGP Appendix D.2.2.

Step 3: Determine if the Construction Activity’s Discharges or Discharge-Related Activities Are Likely to Adversely Affect Listed Threatened or Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat If NO choose option C If YES continue to step 4

You must next assess whether your discharges or discharge-related activities are likely to adversely affect listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat. See CGP Appendix D.2.3.

Step 4: Determine if Measures Can Be Implemented to Avoid Adverse Effects If ABLE choose option C If UNABLE continue to step 5

Make a determination that if appropriate measures are undertaken whether you can avoid or eliminate the likelihood of adverse effects prior to applying for CGP coverage.

Step 5 Determine if the Eligibility Requirements of Criterion D, E, or F Can Be Met

Criterion D: You have coordinated with the Services and have addressed the effects of your site’s discharges on federally-listed threatened or endangered species and federally-designated critical habitat, which resulted in a written concurrence from the relevant Service(s) that your site’s discharges are not likely to adversely affect listed species or critical habitat Criterion E: Formal or informal ESA section 7 consultation is performed with the FWS and/or NMFS and that consultation addresses the effects of your discharges and discharge-related activities on federally-listed and threatened species and designated critical habitat.

Ver. 01-14-13 8

Site Information

Site Address Near the East End of Calle Contenta, Corrales NM, 87048

Total common Plan of Development Acres <5 ac Total Disturbed acres for this project .8 ac Soil Condition (i.e. Sandy loam etc.) Sandy Clay Loam, Med OC Average slope Before 1.0% After 1.0% Average impervious area Before 25% After 25% Existing Foliage on the project area by Ocular Estimate

Density Coverage

Grass & Weeds 10% 15% Brush % % Trees % % Bare Soil 100% 60% Asphalt/Concrete/Impervious 100% 25%

System that currently exist or will exist On-site to control drainage

Operational Now Be Installed but not currently operational

Storm sewer Inlets Yes No Yes No Detention / Retention Ponds Yes No Yes No Ditches/Channels Yes No Yes No Other-Vegetation Yes No Yes No

System that currently exist or will exist Off-site to control drainage Operational Now To Be Installed but not

currently operational Storm sewer Inlets Yes No Yes No Detention / Retention Ponds Yes No Yes No Ditches/Channels Yes No Yes No Other-Vegetation Yes No Yes No Latitude: 35.2606 Longitude: 106.5990 Latitude and Longitude acquired from:

Google Earth

RUSLE Calculations – Sediment delivery Before construction During w/o controls During w/ controls After construction .48 t/ac/yr 1.3 t/ac/yr .30 t/ac/yr .40 t/ac/yr

Ver. 01-14-13 9

Site Information Continued

Yes

This project ultimately discharges into waters of the United States as defined at 40CFR§122.2 that is tested and maintained for Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL)

Yes This project is in an arid region with an average annual rain fall of 0 to 10 inches

No

This project is in a semi arid region with an average annual rain fall of 10 to 20 inches.

No

This project discharges into a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) as defined at 40CFR§122.26(b)(8) to mean a conveyance or system of conveyances including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch drains, curbs, gutters, ditches, man made channels or storm drains.

No This project is in Indian Country as defined in 40CFR§122.2

No There are wetlands inside the perimeter of this project or the greater common plan of development it may be a part of.

No This project is considered “large construction activity” as defined by 40CFR§122.26(b) (14) (x)

Yes This project is considered “small construction activity” as defined by 40CFR§122.26(b) (15).

Yes This project ultimately discharges into impaired waters as described in Appendix A of the CGP.

No Will there be any storm water discharges associated with industrial activities other than construction at the site which will occur?

No This project requires a 404 Permit. For the purpose of this SWPPP the engineer is responsible to have the permit in place and active.

No Dewatering will be part of the construction activity on this project.

Ver. 01-14-13 10

Receiving Waters The ‘receiving waters’ for this project are the Rio Grande A TMDL status has been established and approved for these waters. E coli is the TMDL pollutant listed that would impair water quality for this receiving water and has been reported to EPA. If EPA identifies an additional TMDL pollutant for the receiving water of this project, then necessary steps will be taken to incorporate that allocation into this SWPPP and action taken to meet these new requirements. Additional pollutants are: Acute Aquatic Toxicity, Gross Alpha, Dissolved Oxygen, PCB’s, PCB’s in Fish Tissue.

Historic Properties It has been determined that there are no historic properties that would be adversely affected by this project. The list of historic sites posted by the New Mexico Historic Preservation Division is in the tabbed section of the SWPPP “Historic Properties”. Also the owner /operator has no knowledge of any historic sites eligible for listing that have not already been listed with the National Register of Historic sites.

Ver. 01-14-13 11

On-site and Off-site Support Activities For The Project

Concrete or Asphalt Batch Plants

N/A

They can be located onsite or offsite. Coverage under this permit is authorized only if the plant adheres to criteria outlined in 1.3(4X3)

of the CGP BMPs suitable to control storm water from a batch plant must be implemented. Stormwater discharges from this

support activity are not allowed.

No

Equipment Staging Area for parking.

re-fueling and maintenance.

On-site

Equipment parked in the staging area should be monitored for leaks. Drip pans should be used for maintenance and leaks. Fuel tanks should have secondary containment and if larger than 1320

gallons, will have a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) plan available onsite. All petroleum products must be

stored in closed weather proof containers. Used petroleum products must be properly disposed of.

Yes

Miscellaneous Material Storage Area

On-site

Containers for solvents, glues, lubricants, curing compounds and other such construction materials must be kept closed containers

when not in use. Drop pans must be used under any container with spigots or valves. Large containers, such as 55 gallon drums, will

have secondary containment. Personnel will be educated on proper spill response procedures. Material safety data sheets and s spill

response poster will be displayed onsite.

Yes

Excavated material Disposal Area

On-site

Areas where excavated material is stored onsite will be shown on the map. If excavated material is stored offsite and is a location dedicated to this project, a separate location map and site map

showing appropriate BMPs will be included in the SWPPP. If an excavated materials pile is left undisturbed for more than 14 days the pile will be properly vegetated. (subject to provisions for arid and semi arid regions) If the disposal location is not dedicated to

this project, the SWPPP for the disposal area is the responsibility of others.

Yes

Borrow Areas

On-site

If the location for borrow is dedicated to this project, a location map and site map with appropriate BMPs will be included in the

SWPPP. If borrow location is not dedicated to this project, the SWPPP for the borrow area is the responsibility of others

Yes

Ver. 01-14-13 12

Allowable Non-Storm Water Discharges

You are authorized for the following non-storm water discharges, provided the non-storm water component of the discharge is in compliance with Subpart 1.3 (Types of discharges Authorized Under

the CGP)

Potential Controls

1 Discharges from fire-fighting activities; Yes

If spraying water over a landscaped area or bare soil, spray in an arch so that the velocities are dissipated and erosion is minimized. Prevent discharge of foam or other additives to storm drains.

2 Fire hydrant flushings;

No

If the waterline is hyper-chlorinated, it must be de-chlorinated at the discharge point using accepted procedures and chemicals per AWWA standards. Once the water is neutralized it can be directed into the available storm water sewer system (ex. drop inlets or ditch system), collected by trucks and used for dust control or captured in a detention pond created for this purpose. Check local regulations and requirements when choosing to discharge into the storm or sanitary sewer systems.

3 Waters used to wash vehicles where detergents are not used;

Yes Only concrete trucks are allowed to washout on site and they shall use the concrete washout area.

4 Water used to control dust in accordance with Subpart 3.4.G;

Yes Water for dust control will be applied at rates low enough to soak into the ground

5 Potable water including uncontaminated water line flushings;

No

If the waterline is hyper-chlorinated, it must be de-chlorinated at the discharge point using accepted procedures and chemicals per AWWA standards. Once the water is neutralized it can be directed into the available storm water sewer system (ex. drop inlets or ditch system), collected by trucks and used for dust control or captured in a detention pond created for this purpose. Check local regulations and requirements when choosing to discharge into the storm or sanitary sewer systems.

6 Routine external building wash down that does not use detergents;

No

If wetting the stucco for curing purposes or simply cleaning the exterior of the building, the use of BMP’s around the building are seen sufficient to contain the wash down waters for the building.

7 Pavement wash waters where spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have not occurred (unless all spilled material has been removed) and where detergents are not used;

No

Pavement wash waters shall consist only of water used for dust suppressant while street sweeping. Water is not allowed for cleaning up spills. Other approved absorbents shall be used for leaks and spills.

Ver. 01-14-13 13

Allowable Non-Storm Water Discharges

You are authorized for the following non-storm water discharges, provided the non-storm water component of the discharge is in compliance with Subpart 1.3 (Types of discharges Authorized Under

the CGP)

8 Uncontaminated air conditioning or compressor condensate;

Yes

Do not allow condensate from compressors or air conditioning units to run across parking lots or other paved surfaces that may contact pollutants on its way to the storm drain.

9 Uncontaminated ground water or spring water;

No

10 Foundation or footing drains where flows are not contaminated with process materials such as solvents;

No

The use of the perimeter BMP’s are seen sufficient to contain drainage from foundation or footing drains.

11 Uncontaminated excavation dewatering;

No Use ponds, lined swales or vegetated areas for uncontaminated dewatering.

12 Landscape irrigation. No Water for landscape irrigation will be applied at rates low enough to soak into the ground.

Ver. 01-14-13 14

Who must obtain a permit (authorization) for discharges of storm water from construction activity?

Operator Defined in Appendix A of the CGP means any party associated with a construction project that meets either of the following two criteria. 1. The party has operational control over construction plans and specifications, including the ability to make modifications to the plans and specifications or 2. The party has day to day operational control of those activities at the project which are necessary to ensure compliance with a SWPPP for the site or other permit conditions, (e.g. they are authorized to direct workers at the site to carry out activities required by the SWPPP) Using this criteria, the parties involved in any construction project needing a NPDES permit 14 days before any construction activity commences are:

1) The owner of the project 2) The General Contractor of the project 3) Any other contractor who is not under the direct supervision of the General Contractor

Operator – In charge of plans and specs

Permitted Company Authorized Signature Title

Southern Sandoval County Arroyo

Flood Control Authority

Operator(s) – In charge of day to day activity

Permitted Company Authorized Signature Title

Ver. 01-14-13 15

Operator – In charge of plans and specs

Action Company Responsible Ensure a SWPPP is developed and project specifications meet minimum requirements of permit conditions. [File Notice of Intent (NOI).] . Delegate authority to sign reports and implement the SWPPP. Certify the SWPPP, Endangered Species and Historic Preservation Reports. Ensure all areas of the project are included in the SWPPP. Ensure all operators on site are included in the SWPPP and understand the requirements of the CGP/ SWPPP. Ensure the SWPPP is updated as necessary based on changes during construction. Ensure temporary/permanent stabilization practices are implemented within 14 days if construction activity stops. Ensure permanent stabilization is in place when construction is complete. Produce the SWPPP for EPA in a timely fashion in the event of an inspection by EPA. File Notice of Termination (NOT) once my portion of project is complete.

Southern Sandoval County Arroyo

Flood Control Authority

Ver. 01-14-13 16

Operator(s) – In charge of day to day activity Name of Operator

File Notice of Intent (NOI) Yes Ensure project specifications meet minimum requirements of permit conditions

Yes

Installation of structural BMPs Install/create BMPs before soil disturbing activities begin on site.

All BMPs

Sharing responsibility with other operators on site

Maintenance of BMPs (structural and procedural) Maintain all BMPs in good operational condition to final site stabilization and project completion.

All BMPs

Sharing responsibility with other operators on site

Project area you have day to day control of: Identify: Entire project area

Yes

Certify the SWPPP, Endangered Species and Historic Preservation reports

Yes

Delegate Authority to sign reports and implement the SWPPP to qualified individuals/companies.

Yes

Transfer responsibility to maintain or remove BMPs once my portion of the construction is complete.

Yes

Perform Bi-Weekly and after rain event inspections. Inspections frequency may be reduced to bi-weekly or monthly in situations as defined in 2012 CGP 4.1.2.

Yes performing inspections

Delegated responsibility to others Ensure the SWPPP is updated as necessary based on changes during construction.

Yes

Perform procedural BMPs such as street sweeping, solid waste management, etc.

Yes

Install Rain Gage / Check after any rain and fill in Table 1. Yes Produce the SWPPP for EPA in a timely fashion in the event of an inspection by EPA.

Yes

File Notice of Termination (NOT) once my portion of project is complete.

Yes

Ver. 01-14-13 17

Nature of Construction Activity This project will be for the removal of concrete from an existing channel, re-grade the area

with new soil removed from an on site borrow area, installation of new concrete. Construction activities will include installation of erosion controls; removal of concrete and grading of the site; importation of soil; re-grade soil & lay down new concrete; stabilize disturbed soil areas. The BMPs for this project were selected based upon their calculated ability to minimize off site sediment flow during soil disturbing activities. See the RUSLE 2 pages for more details.

Sequence of major soil disturbing activities

Activity Estimated Start Date Actual Start Date

Activity Estimated Start Date Actual Start Date

Create BMPs 12/1/2014

See Inspection Reports and/or Company activity log

Concrete Removal 12/4/2014

See Inspection Reports and/or Company activity log

Grading & Soil Importation

1/20/2015 See Inspection Reports and/or

Company activity log New Concrete


Company activity log Disturbed Areas Stabilization


Company activity log Final Stabilization Complete


Company activity log

Ver. 01-14-13 18

Identify all Potential Sources of Pollution Pollutant Used on

this site Source/Activity Control measures to minimize pollutants

Port-o-let chemicals & Sewage

Yes All phases of construction- Port-o-let or old sewage pipe.

Port-o-let to be kept on a pervious area within the site, sewage pipe to be properly disposed of. Use linings for portable toilets if ground water or spring water is located on site.

Solvents Yes

Build structure, Utilities installation- Utilities and Paint contractor

Solvents to be kept in closed containers and removed from the site by contractor or subcontractor.

Stains, Paints & Wood Preservatives

No

Build structure- Paint Contractor

Oil based stains, paints & chemical wood preservatives to be kept in closed containers and waste paint to be removed from the site by contractor or subcontractor.

Roofing Tar No

Build structure- Roofer-sealing flashing and shingles

Tar to be kept in a closed container and removed from the site by the contractor.

Joint Compound No

Build structure- Drywall Contractor

Unused joint compound will be removed from the site by contractor. Allow empty containers to dry and then properly disposed of them.

Glue Adhesives No

Build structure- Framers & Flooring contractors

Partially full containers will be kept from exposure to storm water and empties properly disposed of.

Waste concrete. Concrete, stucco, mortar and wash water

Yes

Utilities installation, Slab construction, Paving & sidewalks- Concrete trucks, Stucco contractors, Brick & Block Layers

Use the concrete washout area for trucks, mixers, buckets and any other washout water. Use linings for concrete washouts.

Concrete curing compound Yes

Slab construction, Sidewalks- Concrete Contractor

Partially full containers will be kept from exposure to storm water and empties properly disposed of..

Construction debris and trash

Yes

All contractors and workers

Use good housekeeping habits. Have regular pickup of construction debris. Blowing trash, plastic, metal and paint containers contained in some type of trash bin for offsite disposal.

Paint wash water No

Build structure- Painting Contractors

Wash out in a designated area. Washout pits must have a liner.

Refrigerant Yes

Build structure- House & Vehicle A/C Units

Use people trained and certified to handle and install refrigerant.

Asphalt No

Paving Paving will not be preformed immediately before an anticipated rain event.

Oils

Yes

All phases of construction- Equipment and vehicles.

Any spills will be cleaned up immediately and properly disposed of. Reportable quantities will be reported. Drip pans are to be used for leaks and during maintenance. Spill response kits will be kept on site.

Grease Yes

All phases of construction- Equipment and vehicles.

Empty containers will be properly disposed of.

Ver. 01-14-13 19

Identify all Potential Sources of Pollution Fuel

Yes

All phases of construction - Equipment, Vehicles and fuel tanks. Due to the size of equipment, mobile fuel trucks may re-fuel equipment outside the staging areas and must follow standard operating procedures.

Stationary onsite fuel tanks will have secondary containment. Spills will be cleaned up and vehicles leaking fuel will be repaired. Mobile fuel trucks will be monitored full time while re-fueling equipment. Mobile fuel trucks will carry a spill response kit and use portable secondary containment. Any fuel stored on site must have a second containment that will hold equal to or greater than 110% of the container capacity. If the container holds 1320 gallons or more a second plan, Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC), needs to be acquired and kept in the SWPPP

Pesticides

No

Landscaping - Termite and other pest controls

Pesticides will be used according to the manufacture’s specification and will not be applied before a rain event. Excess chemical will be removed from the site.

Fertilizer No

Landscaping - Preparation for landscaping

Fertilizer is not to be applied before an immediate rain event and excess fertilizer will be removed from the site.

Sediment/Total suspended solids Yes

All phases of construction - Disturbed soil

Implement appropriate sediment and erosion measures outlined in the SWPPP.

Lead Based paint and Asbestos

No Demolition of structures built before 1978

Have qualified personnel remove these products.

Dust

Yes

Blowing dust from wind and construction activity because of disturbed soils.

Water will be used to knock down excessive blowing dust. Uncontrollable blowing sand from high winds will be addressed after winds die down

Note: For spill responses ensure that adequate supplies are on hand at all times to handle spills, leaks, and disposal of used liquids.

Ver. 01-14-13 20

BMP controls and installation phasing to reduce pollutants Activity Control Measures Taken When Control Measures Implemented

Site Clearing; Grading

Perimeter BMPs dirt berms, existing vegetation Spill response

procedures Good Housekeeping

rules always enforced

Perimeter BMPs installed before major clearing begins.

Spill response kit on site at all times

Concrete Removal

Perimeter BMPs Site entrance BMP Solid waste

containment

Original BMPs exist at this time.

Import Soil From On Site Borrow Area

Perimeter BMPs Solid waste

containment

Trash Receptacle on site as needed. Original BMPs exist at this time

Final Grading & New Concrete in Channel

Perimeter BMPs Concrete washout Trash Receptacle Solid waste

containment

No concrete installation before anticipated rain event.

Concrete washout existing at this time.

Soil Stabilization

Trash Receptacle Review application

procedures for fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides If these are used.

Review application procedures before applying herbicides or fertilizers.

Ver. 01-14-13 21

Structural Practices Structural practices used to divert flows from exposed soils, retain/detain flow or otherwise limit runoff and discharge of pollutants from exposed areas of the site are listed on the BMP checklist page of this SWPPP. Structural practices may include but are not limited to those listed in the Sediment Control Plan (SCP). Best Management Practices (BMPs) were selected based on compliance requirements and control effectiveness in accordance with manufacture specifications and good engineering practices. A goal was established to reduce sediment and contain potential pollutants to levels that would not negatively impact receiving waters. Design and construction specifications for selected BMPs are located behind the BMP Tab of this SWPPP.

Ver. 01-14-13 22

Best Management Practices (BMP) Check List

BMP Used? Yes/No

Design Capacity

Design Velocity

Permanent? Yes/No

Selected to Control

Mulch No 1fps No Erosion/Sediment Interceptor Swale/Ditch No 1.5 feet 8fps No Erosion Diversion Dike/Earth

Berm Yes 2 acres 8fps No Erosion

Pipe Slope Drain No 5 acres No Erosion Velocity dissipation

Devices No N/A Erosion

Hay Bale Dike No 0.25 acres 1fps No Erosion/Sediment Silt Fence No 1.0 cfs/ft. 1 fps No Erosion/Sediment

View blocker/dust control fence

No No Dust and Trash/Litter/construction debris

Rolled erosion control blankets

No 1.0 cfs/ft 1 fps N/A Erosion/Sediment

Concrete Wash Area Yes 0.5 CY NA No Sediment Sediment Basin Yes 2yr 24hr

storm or 3600 cu ft/acre

No Sediment

Stabilized Construction Entrance

No 1 acre sites NA No Offsite Tracking/Sediment

Sandbag Berm No 0.1 cfs/ft. 1 fps No Erosion Maintain Existing

Vegetation Yes 1.0 cfs/ft. 1 fps Yes Erosion/Sediment

Cover/Maintain Storm Inlet if Active

No 0.5 cfs/ft. 1 fps No Sediment/Blowing trash/Other solid waste / to be installed once the inlet is

operational Rock Dams No 1.0 cfs/ft 1 fps N/A Erosion

Sediment Barrier/Cut below adjacent grade

No No Sediment

Outlet Protection No Yes Erosion Reinforced Soil

Retaining Systems No No Erosion

Gabions No No Erosion/Sediment Trash Pickup as needed Yes NA NA NA Trash/Construction Debris

Remove Hazardous Chemicals From Site

Yes NA NA NA Hazardous

Contain Wash Waters Onsite

Yes 5 cf NA NA Non Storm Water Discharges

Excavation Pump-out Water – pump onto

vegetated area or through filter material

No NA NA NA Sediment

Sweep Street as needed Yes NA NA NA Sediment Cut Back Curb No NA Erosion/Sediment

Water Yes NA Dust Control Waddles/Mulch socks No NA NA NA Erosion/Sediment

Note: See site map for locations of these controls. Additional sediment controls may be implemented as unforeseen situations arise. See inspection reports for these additional BMPs.

Ver. 01-14-13 23

BMP Maintenance

All erosion and sediment controls and other measures identified in the SWPPP must be maintained in effective operation condition. If site inspections required by Subpart 4.1.2 identify BMPs that are not operating effectively, maintenance must be preformed in accordance with subpart 2.1.1.4 of the CGP which states “Initiate work to fix the problem immediately after discovery and complete such work by the close of the next business day if the problem does not require significant repair or replacement, or if the problem can be corrected through routine maintenance..”. If existing BMPs need to be modified or if additional BMPs are necessary for any reason, implementation must be completed before the next storm event whenever practicable. If implementation before the next storm event is impracticable, the situation must be documented in the SWPPP and alternative BMPs must be implemented as soon as possible.

Silt fence When sediment build up reaches 50% of the height of the fence, the sediment will be

removed. Repair when damaged. Mulch sock or erosion logs

Remove sediment when it reaches 50% of the height of the sock or log. Replace the sock or log if it is damaged and ineffective.

Sediment barrier (cut below adjacent grade or cut back

curb)

Remove sediment build up when it has reached 50% of the height of the barrier.

Track-out pad . If rock in the construction entrance becomes filled with sediment or imbedded in the soil and becomes ineffective, it will be raised, cleaned up or have additional rock

applied to that area. See TRACK-OUT MANAGEMENT on the next page. Chemical toilet Chemical toilets will be set back onto bare soil and not on an impervious surface such

as asphalt or concrete if feasible. Toilets will be staked down to prevent tipping over.

Solid waste receptacle

Empty it when full. Do not over fill.

Sediment basin If sediment fills 50% of the ponding area then the sediment will be removed. Concrete washout When the washout pit is 75% filled with hardened concrete it will be cleaned out. If

the liner leaks it will be repaired or replaced Inlet protection Repair if damaged or compromised by excessive sediment.

Existing vegetation Maintain existing vegetation as much as is feasible.

Earth berms If the dirt berm is flattened or has sediment build up reaching 50% of it’s’ height, then

it will be repaired or have the excess dirt removed.

Ver. 01-14-13 24

Solid Waste management Procedures

Construction waste/debris such as lumber, carpet, shingles, etc. that will not blow and normally comes into contact with Stormwater, may be kept in piles behind the curb and disposed of on a regular basis.

Construction waste that does not normally come into contact with storm water such as drywall, containers for glues/adhesives, petroleum products, etc or can be considered possible “blowing trash” such as any packaging for construction materials, workers lunch bags and wrappers, etc. will be kept in side the structure or in a trash receptacle. Any waste considered to be “blowing trash” will be picked up on a daily basis.

Storm inlet protectors will be placed on storm inlets to prevent solid waste from entering the storm sewer system.

Sediment removed from the site will be taken to a location that has a SWPPP by others or to a location dedicated to the project, identified on the site map and has erosion controls to minimize off-site discharges.

Off Site Track-out Management

Sediment track-out is one of the major reasons pollutants leave the construction site and are transported to the MS4 or other conveyance system and then on to the receiving water. The 2012

CGP has addressed this by instituting the following requirements.

You must minimize the track-out of sediment onto off-site streets, other paved areas, and sidewalks from vehicles exiting your construction site. To comply with this requirement, you must: a. Restrict vehicle use to properly designated exit points; b. Use appropriate stabilization techniques at all points that exit onto paved roads so that sediment removal occurs prior to vehicle exit; c. Where necessary, use additional controls to remove sediment from vehicle tires prior to exit; and d. Where sediment has been tracked-out from your site onto the surface of off-site streets, other paved areas, and sidewalks, you must remove the deposited sediment by the end of the same work day in which the track-out occurs or by the end of the next work day if track-out occurs on a non-work day. You must remove the track-out by sweeping, shoveling, or vacuuming these surfaces, or by using other similarly effective means of sediment removal. You are prohibited from hosing or sweeping tracked-out sediment into any stormwater conveyance (unless it is connected to a sediment basin, sediment trap, or similarly effective control), storm drain inlet, or surface water.

Ver. 01-14-13 25

Hazardous Waste Management Procedures

Hazardous materials or any product for which there is a published MSDS, i.e. Paint, thinners, solvents, petroleum products, glue, etc.

Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for all hazardous materials used on the project site will be posted at a conspicuous location and employees informed on how to respond to spills or procedures to take in cast of contact with these hazardous materials.

Hazardous materials ‘will not’ be exposed to storm water. They will be kept in closed containers inside the structure or other enclosed structure designed to protect hazardous materials.

Containers of hazardous material will be clearly labeled Hazardous materials such as paint, thinners, solvents, fertilizers and other products that are

packaged in containers of five (5) gallons or less will be removed from the site each day by the contractor.

Chemical toilets will be set back behind the curb to ensure containment on site in case of a spill.

Waste paints, thinners, solvents and used petroleum products will be removed by the contractor each day for proper disposal. No waste products will be disposed of in the dumpster.

A spill response bulletin will be posted on site when possible or located in the Superintendent’s vehicle.

List of Hazardous Materials kept on site

See the hazardous materials log sheet at the back of this section.

Ver. 01-14-13 26

Spill Response Procedures Spill will be cleaned as soon as possible and reported, if required. Spill material will be properly disposed of offsite. Personnel on site responsible for fluid material handling should review spill response procedures. A copy of the spill response plan will be posted at the site near where liquid materials are stored. In cases of spill, personnel onsite will make decisions in response to the spill based on the following decisions hierarchy:

1. Protect People 2. Protect Property

3. Protect the Environment The discharge of hazardous substances or oil from the site must be prevented or minimized using the best management practices (BMPs) identified in the SWPPP. Any discharges in 24 hours equal to or in excess of the reportable quantities listed in 40 CFR Part 110, 117, or 302 will be reported to the National Response Center as soon as practical after knowledge of the spills known to the site staff. The SWPPP must be modified with in seven (7) calendar days of knowledge of the release to provide a description of the release, the circumstances leading to the release, and the date of the release. In addition, the plan must identify measures to prevent the reoccurrence of such releases and to respond to such releases, and the plan must be modified where appropriate.

Agency Phone Number National Response Center (800) 424-8802 NM Environmental Department Emergency Non-Emergency

(505) 827-9329 (866) 428-6535

Material Media Released To Reportable Quantity Engine oil, fuel, hydraulic and brake fluid

Land 25 gallons

Paints. Solvents, thinners Land 100 lbs (13 gallons) Engine oil, fuel, hydraulic and brake fluid

Water Visible Sheen

Antifreeze, battery acid, gasoline, engine degreasers

Air, Land, Water 100 lbs (13 gallons)

Freon Air 1 lb

Ver. 01-14-13 27

Deadlines for Initiating Stabilization

You must initiate soil stabilization measures immediately whenever earth-disturbing activities have permanently or temporarily ceased on any portion of the site.

Earth-disturbing activities have permanently ceased when clearing and excavation within

any area of your construction site that will not include permanent structures has been completed. Earth-disturbing activities have temporarily ceased when clearing, grading, and excavation within any area of the site that will not include permanent structures will not resume (i.e., the land will be idle) for a period of 14 or more calendar days, but such activities will resume in the future. The 14 calendar day timeframe above begins counting as soon as you know that construction work on a portion of your site will be temporarily ceased. In circumstances where you experience unplanned or unanticipated delays in construction due to circumstances beyond your control (e.g., sudden work stoppage due to unanticipated problems associated with construction labor, funding, or other issues related to the ability to work on the site; weather conditions rendering the site unsuitable for the continuation of construction work) and you do not know at first how long the work stoppage will continue, your requirement to immediately initiate stabilization is triggered as soon as you know with reasonable certainty that work will be stopped for 14 or more additional calendar days. For the purposes of this permit, EPA will consider any of the following types of activities to constitute the initiation of stabilization: 1. Prepping the soil for vegetative or non-vegetative stabilization; 2. Applying mulch or other non-vegetative product to the exposed area; 3. Seeding or planting the exposed area; 4. Starting any of the activities in # 1 – 3 on a portion of the area to be stabilized, but not on the entire area;

and 5. Finalizing arrangements to have stabilization product fully installed in compliance with the applicable

deadline for completing stabilization in Parts 2.2.1.2 and 2.2.1.3.

Deadline to complete stabilization The deadline to complete stabilization is 14 calendar days after initiating stabilization measures

Exceptions to the deadline 1) For projects occurring in arid or semi-arid areas, or drought stricken areas. 2) For projects that are affected by circumstances beyond the control of the permittee that delay the initiation and/or completion of vegetative stabilization as required in Parts 2.2.1.1 and/or 2.2.1.2. Examples include problems with the supply of seed stock or with the availability of specialized equipment, unsuitability of soil conditions due to excessive precipitation and/or flooding. Final Stabilization is defined as - on areas not covered by permanent structures, either (1) vegetation has been established, or for arid or semi-arid areas, will be established that provides a uniform (e.g., evenly distributed, without large bare areas) perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of the natural background vegetative cover, or (2) non-vegetative stabilization methods have been implemented to provide effective cover for exposed portions of the site.

Ver. 01-14-13 28

Interim Stabilization

What Where When

Soil Tackifier Distrubed areas that are bare ground and pond liner areas.

Apply soil tackifier on portions of the site that became inactive for more than 14 days, but not ready for permanent stabilization or construction ceases.

Permanent Stabilization

What Where When

Vegetation/Soil Stabilizer See the site map

During the final stages of the project.

Concrete See the site map During the final stages of the project.

Ver. 01-14-13 29

Permanent Stabilization Continued Post Construction controls On site Yes/No Explanation of Selection Storm Water Detention Structures

YES Storm water detention structures currently exist on this project

Storm Water Retention Structures NO

Storm water retention structures include streets and storm drain collection system.

Flow Attenuation by Use of Open Vegetated Swales and Natural Depressions NO

Open vegetated swales are used around the structure to carry storm water away from the site. These swales allow for increased infiltration compared to concrete swales.

Infiltration of Runoff Onsite Permanent Vegetation

YES Vegetated grass areas provide for increased infiltration onsite to reduce runoff from the site once construction has been completed.

Interceptor Swale

NO

An interceptor swale is used to divert run-on water away from the finished project or to divert runoff water from construction areas to avoid runoff crossing disturbed areas.

Velocity dissipation devices NO

Diversion Dike NO

Diversion dikes are similar in function to interceptor swales in controlling run-on or runoff.

Storm Drain system

NO

A curb and gutter storm drain system or drainage ditch discharge system is installed on most projects. The storm water is collected in the street and channeled to either the curb inlet or drainage ditch system.

Ver. 01-14-13 30

Maintaining an Updated Plan A. Needed repair and maintenance of BMPs identified in between inspections by site

Superintendent or during the regular inspection should be repaired and maintenance attended to with in seven (7) calendar days or before the next storm event

B. The SWPPP, including the site map, must be amended whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance at the construction site that has or could have a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to the waters of the United States that has not been previously addressed in the SWPPP.

C. The SWPPP must be amended if during inspections or investigations by site staff, or by local, state, tribal or federal officials, it is determined that the SWPPP is ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in storm water discharges from the construction site.

Inspections

A. Inspections will be conducted at least once every 14 calendar day and with in 24 hours of the end of a storm event of 0.25 inches or greater.

B. Inspections are to be done bi-weekly or at least once every month in situation as defined in 2012 CGP Part 4.1.4.

C. Inspections must be conducted by qualified personnel. “Qualified personnel” means a person knowledgeable in the practices and principles of erosion and sediment controls who possesses the skills to assess conditions at the construction site that could impact storm water quality and to assess the effectiveness of any sediment and erosion control measures selected to control the quality of storm water from the construction activity.

D. Inspections must include all areas of the site disturbed by construction activity and areas used for storage of materials that are exposed to precipitation. Inspectors must look for evidence of, or the potential for, pollutants entering the storm water conveyance system. Sedimentation and erosion control measures identified in the SWPPP must be observed to ensure proper operation. Discharge locations must be inspected to ascertain whether erosion control measures are effective in preventing significant impacts to waters of the United States, where accessible. Where discharge locations are inaccessible, nearby downstream locations must be inspected to the extent that such inspections are practicable. Locations where vehicles enter or exit the site must be inspected for evidence of off-site sediment tracking.

Ver. 01-14-13 31

Inspections Continued

E. Utility line installation, pipeline construction, and other examples of long, narrow, linear construction activities may limit the access of inspection personnel to the areas described above. Inspection of these areas could require that vehicles compromise temporarily or even permanently stabilized areas, cause additional disturbance of soils, and increase the potential for erosion. In these circumstances, controls must be inspected on the same frequencies as other construction projects, but representative inspections may be performed. For representative inspections, personnel must inspect controls along the construction site for 0.25 mile above and below each access point where a roadway, undisturbed right-of-way, or other similar feature intersects the construction site and allows access to the areas described above. The conditions of the controls along each inspected 0.25 mile segment may be considered as representative of the condition of controls along that reach extending from the end of the 0.25 mile segment to either the end of the next 0.25 mile inspected segment, or to the end of the project, whichever occurs first.

F. A record of each inspection and of any actions taken in accordance with this Part must be retained as part of the SWPPP for at least three years from the date that permit coverage expires or is terminated. The inspection reports must identify any incidents of non-compliance with the permit conditions. Where a report does not identify any incidents of non-compliance, the report must contain a certification that the construction project or site is in compliance with the SWPPP and this permit. The report must be signed in accordance with Appendix I, Section I.11 of this permit. When reports are signed using an electronic signature (for ease of emailing reports), signator will use robust second-factor authentication..

Ver. 01-14-13 32

Applicable State, Tribal, or Local Programs A The SWPPP must be consistent with all applicable federal, state, tribal, or local

requirements for soil and erosion control and storm water management, including updates to the SWPPP as necessary to reflect any revisions to applicable federal, state, tribal, or local requirements for soil and erosion control.

B Permittees which discharge storm water associated with construction activities must ensure their storm water pollution prevention plan is consistent with requirements specified in applicable sediment and erosion site plans or site permits, or storm water management site plans or site permits approved by State, Tribal or local officials. This SWPPP is in compliance with all applicable federal, state, tribal or local requirements concerning storm water runoff. Copies of any applicable requirements are attached to the SWPPP.

C Storm water pollution prevention plans must be updated as necessary to remain consistent with any changes applicable to protecting surface water resources in sediment and erosion site plans or site permits, or storm water management site plans or site permits approved by State, Tribal or local officials for which the permittee received written notice. This SWPPP will be amended as necessary to stay current with all federal, state, tribal or local regulations affecting storm water runoff from this project.

Disclaimer

The SWPPP requires all erosion and sediment control measures to be maintained in effective operation condition. If site inspections identify BMPs that are not operating effectively, maintenance must be preformed with in 24 hours. Clients recognize that Inspections Plus, Inc. has no authority to force clients to act on; to implement new BMPs; or repair damaged existing BMPs. Clients of Inspections Plus, Inc. understand that EPA regulations regarding the Clean Water Act or any other regulations associated with storm water compliance can be open to the interpretations of the government enforcement officers. For these reasons Inspections Plus, Inc. cannot be held responsible for fines imposed by government regulators. By accepting the SWPPP, the Owner/Contractor accepts this disclaimer and its conditions.

Ver. 01-14-13 33

Jobsite Chemical Inventory

Project: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Ph. 2 Project Location: Corrales, NM Superintendent: Date: 9/8/2014

CHEMICAL COMMON NAME MSDS SHEETS PHYSICAL LOCATION MATERIAL OWNER

You are here: EPA Home Water WATERS Water Quality Assessment and TMDL Information Watershed Quality Assessment Report

Watershed Assessment, Tracking &

Environmental ResultS

Recent Additions | Contact Us Search: All EPA This Area

Go

Assessment Summary for Reporting Year 2010New Mexico, Rio Grande-Albuquerque Watershed

Description of this table

Click here to list Threatened and Impaired Waters Only

NOTE: Click on the underlined "Waterbody Name" to view a Waterbody report.

Waterbody

Name

Waterbody

IDLocation Map

Waterbody

TypeSize Units Status

State TMDL

Development

Status

Abo Arroyo

(Rio Grande NM-

Huc:13020203,

Rio Grande-

Albuquerque

Watershed. Waterbody

Frequent Questions

About This Database

(Integrated Report)

Assessing Water Quality

(Questions and Answers)

Integrated Reporting

Guidance

Previous National Water

Quality Reports

EnviroMapper for Water

AskWATERS

EPA WATERS Homepage

Exchange Network

Assessment Database

Statewide Statistical Surveys

Draft statistical survey

web report

Demo of statistical survey

template (mpeg4, 101MB

zipped)

New Mexico, Rio Grande-Albuquerque Watershed

Click on the watershed for an interactive map

Search for a waterbody within Rio Grande-Albuquerque

Enter Waterbody Name:

Search

Return to home page

On This Page

Assessment

Summary

Causes of

Impairment

Probable Sources

Contributing to

Impairment

TMDL

Alternatives by

Cause of

Impairment

Cumulative

TMDLs by

Pollutant

New Mexico State Report

For More Information:

Download Excel

compatible information

Download GIS

Information (Internet

Explorer only)

Water Quality Data

Available for this

Watershed

Share

Page 1 of 5Watershed Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA

2/13/2012http://iaspub.epa.gov/tmdl_waters10/attains_watershed.control

To

Headwaters)

2103.A_40 Enters Rio

Grande From

East About 15

Miles South Of

Belen.

Map

River 37.4 Miles Good

Conservancy

Park Lake

NM-

9000.B_032

Huc:13020203,

Rio Grande-

Albuquerque

Watershed.

4945 Feet

Elevation.

Waterbody

Map

Freshwater

Reservoir15.0 Acres Not_Assessed

La Joya

Lakes

NM-

2103.B_10

Huc:13020203,

Rio Grande-

Albuquerque

Watershed.

These Two

Lakes Are

Located Near

The Rio Grande

In Socorro

County. 4699

Feet Elevation.

Waterbody

Map

Freshwater

Reservoir166.5 Acres Not_Assessed

Rio Grande

(Isleta

Pueblo Bnd

To Alameda

Bridge)

NM-

2105_50

Huc:13020203,

Rio Grande-

Albuquerque

Watershed.

From Isleta

Pueblo To

Alameda Street

Bridge.

Waterbody

MapRiver 20.4 Miles Impaired TMDL needed

Rio Grande

(Non-Pueblo

Alameda

Bridge To

Hwy 550

Bridge)

NM-

2105.1_00

Huc:13020203,

Rio Grande-

Albuquerque

Watershed.

The Angostura

Diversion

Works Are

Within .25

Miles Of The

Jemez River

Confluence.

Waterbody


Rio Grande

(Non-Pueblo

Hwy 550

Bridge To

Angostura

Div)

NM-

2105.1_02

Huc:13020203,

Rio Grande-

Albuquerque

Watershed.

The Angostura

Diversion

Works Are

Within .25

Miles Of The

Jemez River

Confluence.

Waterbody

MapRiver 1.6 Miles Good

Rio Grande

Huc:13020203,

Rio Grande-

Albuquerque

Watershed. Rio

Puerco Enters

Rio Grande



Top of page

Causes of Impairment for Reporting Year 2010

New Mexico, Rio Grande-Albuquerque


(Rio Puerco

To Isleta

Pueblo Bnd)NM-

2105_40

About 40 Miles

South Of

Albuquerque.

Isleta Pueblo Is

Immediately

South Of

Albuquerque.

Waterbody


Rio Grande

(San Marcial

At Usgs

Gage To Rio

Puerco)

NM-

2105_10

Huc:13020203,

Rio Grande-

Albuquerque

Watershed.

San Marcial Is

40 Miles North

Of Truth Or

Consequences.

Rio Puerco

Enters Rio

Grande About

40 Miles

Further North

(About 40

Miles South Of

Albuquerque).

Waterbody


Tijeras

Arroyo (Rio

Grande To

Headwaters)

NM-

9000.A_001

Huc:13020203,

Rio Grande-

Albuquerque

Watershed.

Enters Rio

Grande From

East In

Albuquerque.

Waterbody


NOTE: Click on the underlined "Cause of Impairment" value to see a listing of those waters with that cause of

impairment.

Cause of Impairment

Size of Assessed Waters with Listed Causes of

Impairment

Rivers and

Streams (Miles)

Lakes, Reservoirs,

and Ponds (Acres)

Aluminum 59.4

Ambient Bioassays -- Acute Aquatic Toxicity 11.9

Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators 4.8

Dissolved Oxygen 32.3

Temperature, Water 55.8

Benthic Macroinvertebrates Bioassessments 4.8

Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) 127.1

PCB(s) in Fish Tissue 32.3



Top of page

Probable Sources Contributing to Impairments for Reporting Year 2010



Top of page

TMDL Alternatives by Cause of Impairment for Reporting Year 2010


No TMDL Alternatives reported.

Top of page

Cumulative TMDLs by Pollutant


This chart includes TMDLs since October 1, 1995.


Probable Source

Size of Assessed Waters with Probable Sources

of Impairments

Rivers and

Streams (Miles)

Lakes, Reservoirs,

and Ponds (Acres)

Atmospheric Deposition - Toxics 32.3

Channelization 4.8

Drought-Related Impacts 4.8

Impervious Surface/Parking Lot Runoff 127.1

Municipal (Urbanized High Density Area) 127.1

Municipal Point Source Discharges 127.1

Natural Sources 59.4

On-Site Treatment Systems (Septic Systems And

Similar Decentralized Systems)131.9

Rangeland Grazing 4.8

Source Unknown 131.9

Wastes From Pets 131.9

Waterfowl 127.1

NOTE: Click on the underlined "Number of TMDLs Completed" value

to see a listing of those approved TMDLs for the pollutant.

PollutantNumber of TMDLs

Completed

Number of Causes

of

Impairment

Addressed



EPA Home Privacy and Security Notice Contact Us

http://iaspub.epa.gov/tmdl_waters10/attains_watershed.control

Print As-Is

Last updated on Monday, February 13, 2012

This document will now print as it appears on screen when you use the File » Print command.

Use View » Refresh to return to original state.

Total: 6 TMDLs; 6 Causes of Impairment

Search TMDL Documents

Full Text Search of TMDL Documents

Top of page

Escherichia Coli

(E. Coli)4 4

Aluminum 1 1

Fecal Coliform 1 1



RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record Info: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Ph. 2- While operations are ongoing the 2 areas are disturbed. Due to the borrow area creating a hole, the R2 calculations don’t necessarily apply here, however they do apply to the staging area. A dirt berm is placed around this area and down slope from the borrow site. This is calculated to be sufficient to minimize off site sediment flow during construction work. File: profiles\Sandoval Co NM Inputs: Location: New Mexico\Sandoval County\NM_Sandoval_R22-25 Soil: sandy clay loam (mod-high OM) Slope length (horiz): 75 ft Avg. slope steepness: 1.0 % Management Vegetation Yield units Yield (# of units)

Contouring: a. rows up-and-down hill Strips/barriers: (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: 1 Diversion 0.05% grade at bottom of RUSLE slope Subsurface drainage: (none) Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial Outputs: T value: 3.0 t/ac/yr Soil loss erod. portion: 1.3 t/ac/yr Detachment on slope: 1.3 t/ac/yr Soil loss for cons. plan: 0.86 t/ac/yr Sediment delivery: 0.30 t/ac/yr Crit. slope length: -- ft Surf. cover after planting: -- %

Date Operation Vegetation Surf. res. cov. after op, % 12/1/2014 Create BMP, Bulldozer, Soil Removal 0

RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record Info: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Ph. 2- During construction the borrow and staging areas are disturbed. The calculations on this page show the estimated off site sediment flow if no BMPs are used during soil disturbing operations. File: profiles\Sandoval Co NM Inputs: Location: New Mexico\Sandoval County\NM_Sandoval_R22-25 Soil: sandy clay loam (mod-high OM) Slope length (horiz): 75 ft Avg. slope steepness: 1.0 % Management Vegetation Yield units Yield (# of units)

Contouring: a. rows up-and-down hill Strips/barriers: (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none) Subsurface drainage: (none) Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial Outputs: T value: 3.0 t/ac/yr Soil loss erod. portion: 1.3 t/ac/yr Detachment on slope: 1.3 t/ac/yr Soil loss for cons. plan: 1.3 t/ac/yr Sediment delivery: 1.3 t/ac/yr Crit. slope length: -- ft Surf. cover after planting: -- %

Date Operation Vegetation Surf. res. cov. after op, % 12/1/2014 No BMPs, Bulldozer, Soil Removal 0

RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record Info: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Ph. 2- Before construction the staging and borrow areas are sparsely covered with vegetation yielding less than 200# per acre by visual estimate. The staging area used in phase 1 will also be used for this part of the project. Off site flow goes to the Rio Grande located 340 yards east of the site. File: profiles\Sandoval Co NM Inputs: Location: New Mexico\Sandoval County\NM_Sandoval_R22-25 Soil: sandy clay loam (mod-high OM) Slope length (horiz): 150 ft Avg. slope steepness: 1.0 %

Management Vegetation Yield units

Yield (# of units)

Strip/Barrier Managements\Warm season grass; not harvested

Permanent cover not harvested\Grass, warm season permanent, not harvested tons 0.10

Contouring: a. rows up-and-down hill Strips/barriers: (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none) Subsurface drainage: (none) Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial Outputs: T value: 3.0 t/ac/yr Soil loss erod. portion: 0.48 t/ac/yr Detachment on slope: 0.48 t/ac/yr Soil loss for cons. plan: 0.48 t/ac/yr Sediment delivery: 0.48 t/ac/yr Crit. slope length: -- ft Surf. cover after planting: 0 %

Date Operation Vegetation Surf. res. cov. after op, %3/1/2014 Begin Growth Permanent cover not harvested\Grass, warm season permanent, not harvested 0

RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record Info: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Ph. 2-After operations are complete the disturbed areas are re-seeded or otherwise stabilized. The new channel concrete is also in place at this time. Off site flow continues to the Rio Grande located east of the site. File: profiles\Sandoval Co NM Inputs: Location: New Mexico\Sandoval County\NM_Sandoval_R22-25 Soil: sandy clay loam (mod-high OM) Slope length (horiz): 75 ft Avg. slope steepness: 1.0 %

Management Vegetation Yield units

Yield (# of units)

Strip/Barrier Managements\Warm season grass; not harvested

Permanent cover not harvested\Grass, warm season permanent, not harvested tons 0.15

Contouring: a. rows up-and-down hill Strips/barriers: (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none) Subsurface drainage: (none) Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial Outputs: T value: 3.0 t/ac/yr Soil loss erod. portion: 0.40 t/ac/yr Detachment on slope: 0.40 t/ac/yr Soil loss for cons. plan: 0.40 t/ac/yr Sediment delivery: 0.40 t/ac/yr Crit. slope length: -- ft Surf. cover after planting: 0 %

Date Operation Vegetation Surf. res. cov. after op, %3/1/2015 Begin New Growth Permanent cover not harvested\Grass, warm season permanent, not harvested 0

Permit No.________________________ Everett H. Spencer US EPA Region 6 1445 Ross Ave., Suite 1200 (6#N-Wt) Dallas, TX 75202-2733 Delegating an “Authorized Representative” for Dear Mr. Spencer: This letter serves to designate the specifically described position as an authorized person for signing reports and performing certain activities requested by the Director of required by the NPDES General Permit until further notice is provided in writing. This authorization cannot be used for signing an NPDES permit application (e.g., Notice of Intent (NOI) in accordance with 40 CFR 122.22. The following person or position is hereby authorized to conduct bi-weekly and after rain event inspections and sign reports incident thereto. _______A qualified storm water inspector employed by Inspections Plus.__________ By signing this authorization, I confirm that I meet the following requirements to make such a designation as set forth in Appendix G.11.A of the Construction General Permit. “I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted, is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.” Company Name: Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority Project or Site: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2 Signature: ______________________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________________

Permit No.________________________ Everett H. Spencer US EPA Region 6 1445 Ross Ave., Suite 1200 (6#N-Wt) Dallas, TX 75202-2733 Delegating an “Authorized Representative” for Dear Mr. Spencer: This letter serves to designate the specifically described position as an authorized person for signing reports and performing certain activities requested by the Director of required by the NPDES General Permit until further notice is provided in writing. This authorization cannot be used for signing an NPDES permit application (e.g., Notice of Intent (NOI) in accordance with 40 CFR 122.22. The following person or position is hereby authorized to conduct bi-weekly and after rain event inspections and sign reports incident thereto. _______A qualified storm water inspector employed by Inspections Plus.__________ By signing this authorization, I confirm that I meet the following requirements to make such a designation as set forth in Appendix G.11.A of the Construction General Permit. “I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted, is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.” Company Name: Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority Project or Site: Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2 Signature: ______________________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________________

Delegation of Authority

Delegation of Authority has been granted to

for the purposes listed below for the project Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2

by with Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority

is authorized to:

Make management decisions which govern the operation of the project with regards to NPDES

General Permit coverage for construction activities in Region 6.

Initiate and direct other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental

compliance with environmental laws and regulations.

Make sure necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate

information for permit application requirements and has authority to sign and submit such

documents, certify SWPPP’s and sign inspection reports.

Corporation:

Print Name: __________________________________________

Signature: __________________________________________

Title: __________________________________________

Delegation of Authority

Delegation of Authority has been granted to

for the purposes listed below for the project Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Phase 2

by with Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority

is authorized to:

Make management decisions which govern the operation of the project with regards to NPDES

General Permit coverage for construction activities in Region 6.

Initiate and direct other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental compliance

with environmental laws and regulations.

Make sure necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate

information for permit application requirements and has authority to sign and submit such

documents, certify SWPPP’s and sign inspection reports.

Corporation:

Print Name: __________________________________________

Signature: __________________________________________

Title: __________________________________________

Species ReportsEnvironmental Conservation Online System

Species By County Report

The following report contains Species that are known to or are believed to occur in this county. Species with range unrefined past the state level are now excluded from this report. If you are looking for the Section 7 range (for Section 7 Consultations), please visit the IPaC application.

County: Bernalillo, NM

Last updated: February 24, 2012

ECOS Home | Contact Us

Group Name Population Status Lead Office Recovery Plan Name Recovery Plan Action Status Recovery Plan Stage

Birds

Yellow-billedCuckoo (Coccyzus

americanus)

Western U.S. DPS

Candidate

Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office

- - -

Mexicanspotted owl (Strix

occidentalis

lucida)

Threatened

Arizona Ecological Services Field Office

Draft Recovery Plan for the Mexican Spotted Owl, FirstRevision (Strix occidentalis lucida)

View Implementation Progress

Draft Revision 1

Southwesternwillow flycatcher (Empidonax

traillii

extimus)

Endangered

Arizona Ecological Services Field Office

Final Recovery Plan for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher


Final

Fishes

Rio Grande silvery minnow (Hybognathus

amarus)

Entire, except where listed as an experimentalpopulation

Endangered

New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office

Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathus amarus) RecoveryPlan, First Revision


Final Revision 1

Mammals

New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus

hudsonius

luteus)

Candidate - - -

Export options: CSV | EXCEL | XML | PDF

Page 1 of 1Species By County Report

2/24/2012http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/countySearch!speciesByCountyReport.action?fips=35001

Species ProfileEnvironmental Conservation Online System

Rio Grande Silvery minnow (Hybognathus amarus)

Kingdom: Animalia Class: Actinopterygii Order: Cypriniformes Family: Cyprinidae

Listing Status: Endangered and Experimental Population, Non-Essential

Population detail

The FWS is currently monitoring the following populations of the Rio Grande Silvery minnow

�

Quick links: Federal Register Recovery Critical Habitat Conservation Plans Petitions Life History Other Resources

Page 1 of 4Species Profile for Rio Grande Silvery minnow (Hybognathus amarus)

2/24/2012http://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=E07I

Population location: Entire, except where listed as an experimental populationListing status: EndangeredStates/US Territories in which this population is known to or is believed to occur: New MexicoUS Counties in which this population is known to or is believed to occur: View AllUSFWS Refuges in which this population is known to occur: BOSQUE DEL APACHE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, SEVILLETA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGECountries in which the this population is known to occur: Mexico

� Population location: Rio Grande, from Little Box Canyon (approximately 10.4 river miles downstream of Fort Quitman, TX) to Amistad Dam; and on the Pecos River, from its confluence with Independence Creek to its confluence with the Rio Grande.Listing status: Experimental Population, Non-EssentialStates/US Territories in which this population is known to or is believed to occur: TexasUS Counties in which this population is known to or is believed to occur: View All

Current Listing Status SummaryStatus Date Listed Lead Region Where Listed

Endangered 07/20/1994Southwest Region(Region 2)

Entire, except where listed as an experimental population

Experimental Population, Non-Essential

12/08/2008Southwest Region (Region 2)

Rio Grande, from Little Box Canyon to Amistad Dam

» Federal Register Documents

Most Recent Federal Register Documents (Showing 5 of 13: view all)Date Citation Page Title03/29/2010 75 FR 15454 15456 5-Year Status Reviews of 14 Southwestern Species

02/22/2010 75 FR 7625 7626Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathus amarus) Recovery Plan, First Revision

04/09/2009 74 FR 16232 16233Recovery Plan for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathus amarus; draft amendment and supplement to the 2007 Draft revised recovery plan

12/08/2008 73 FR 74357 74372Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Rio Grande Silvery Minnow in the Big Bend Reach of the Rio Grande in Texas

02/22/2008 73 FR 9755 9756Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Rio Grande Silvery Minnow in the Big Bend Reach of the Rio Grande in Texas

Most Recent Special Rule Publications (Showing 3 of 3)Date Citation Page Title

12/08/2008 73 FR 74357 74372Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Rio Grande Silvery Minnow in the Big Bend Reach of the Rio Grande in Texas





» Recovery

Recovery Plan Information Search� Information Search FAQs

» Critical Habitat

To learn more about critical habitat please see http://criticalhabitat.fws.gov

» Conservation Plans

Current Recovery Plan(s)Date Title Plan Action Status Plan Status

02/22/2010Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathus amarus) Recovery Plan, First Revision


Final Revision1

Other Recovery Documents (Showing 4 of 4) Date Citation Page Title Document Type

03/29/2010 75 FR 15454 15456 5-Year Status Reviews of 14 Southwestern Species� Notice 5-year Review, Initiation

02/22/2010 75 FR 7625 7626Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathus amarus) Recovery Plan, First Revision

� Notice Final Recovery PlanAvailability

04/09/2009 74 FR 16232 16233Recovery Plan for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathus amarus; draft amendment and supplement to the 2007 Draft revised recovery plan

� Notice Draft Recovery PlanAvailability

01/18/2007 72 FR 2301 2302Notice of Availability of the Draft Revised Recovery Plan for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathus amarus)

� Notice Draft Recovery PlanAvailability

Current Critical Habitat Documents (Showing 5 of 5) Date Citation Page Title Document Type Status

02/19/2003 68 FR 8088 8135Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow; Final Rule;

Final RuleFinal designated

06/06/2002 67 FR 39206 39235Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow; Proposed Rule

Proposed RuleNot Required

07/22/1999 64 FR 39560ETWP; Final Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow - Correction

Final RuleNotRequired

07/06/1999 64 FR 36274 36290ETWP; Final Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow

Final RuleNot Required

03/01/1993 58 FR 11821 11826Proposed Rule to List the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow as Endangered, With Critical Habitat

Proposed RuleNotRequired



» Petitions

No petition findings have been published for the Rio Grande Silvery minnow.

» Life History

No Life History information has been entered into this system for this species.

» Other Resources

NatureServe Explorer Species Reports -- NatureServe Explorer is a source for authoritative conservation information on more than 50,000 plants, animals and ecological communtities of the U.S and Canada.NatureServe Explorer provides in-depth information on rare and endangered species, but includes common plants and animals too. NatureServe Explorer is a product of NatureServe in collaboration with the Natural Heritage Network.

ITIS Reports -- ITIS (the Integrated Taxonomic Information System) is a source for authoritative taxonomic information on plants, animals, fungi, and microbes of North America and the world.


FWS Endangered Home | ECOS Home | Contact Us

Safe Harbor Agreements (SHA): (learn more)(Showing 2 of 2)

SHA Plan SummariesPueblo of Santa Ana Amendment # 1Pueblo of Santa Ana Safe Harbor Agreement



Species ProfileEnvironmental Conservation Online System

Southwestern Willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus)

Kingdom: Animalia Class: Aves Order: Passeriformes Family: Tyrannidae

Listing Status: Endangered

Where Listed: WHEREVER FOUND

General Information

Small; usually a little less than 6 inches in length, including tail. Conspicuous light-colored wingbars. Lacks theconspicuous pale eye-ring of many similar Empidonax species. Overall, body brownish-olive to gray-green above. Throat whitish, breast pale olive, and belly yellowish. Bill relatively large; lower mandible completely pale. Bestidentified by vocalizations. Call a liquid, sharply whistled whit! or a dry sprrit; song a sneezy witch-pew or fitz-bew. While perched, characteristically flicks tail slightly upward.

This species is listed wherever it is found, but

Quick links: Federal Register Recovery Critical Habitat Conservation Plans Petitions Life History Other Resources

Page 1 of 5Species Profile for Southwestern Willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus)

2/24/2012http://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B094

States/US Territories in which the Southwestern Willow flycatcher is known to or is believed to occur: Arizona , California , Colorado , Nevada , New Mexico , Texas , UtahUS Counties in which the Southwestern Willow flycatcher is known to or is believed to occur: View AllUSFWS Refuges in which the Southwestern Willow flycatcher is known to occur: BILL WILLIAMS RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, BOSQUE DEL APACHE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, CIBOLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, COLORADO RIVER WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, HAVASU NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ... Show All RefugesCountries in which the the Southwestern Willow flycatcher is known to occur: Mexico For more information: http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/Southwes.htm

» Recovery

Recovery Plan Information Search� Information Search FAQs

Current Listing Status SummaryStatus Date Listed Lead Region Where ListedEndangered 02/27/1995 Southwest Region (Region 2)

» Federal Register Documents

Most Recent Federal Register Documents (Showing 5 of 21: view all)Date Citation Page Title

08/15/2011 76 FR 50542 50629Designation of Revised Critical Habitat for Southwestern Willow Flycatcher: Proposed rule.

03/20/2008 73 FR 14995 14997 5-Year Reviews of 28 Southwestern Species

09/27/2007 72 FR 54922 54923Virgin River Habitat Conservation and Recovery Program, Clark County, NV, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) and notice of public meetings

07/27/2007 72 FR 54922 54923Virgin River Habitat Conservation and Recovery Program, Clark County, NV

07/10/2007 72 FR 37540 37542Notice of Availability: Nevada Department of Wildlife, Lincoln County, Nevada, Enhancement of Survival Permit

Current Recovery Plan(s)Date Title Plan Action Status Plan Status

08/30/2002Final Recovery Plan for the Southwestern WillowFlycatcher

View ImplementationProgress

Final

Other Recovery Documents (Showing 4 of 4)



» Critical Habitat

To learn more about critical habitat please see http://criticalhabitat.fws.gov

» Conservation Plans

Date Citation Page Title Document Type

03/20/2008 73 FR 14995 14997 5-Year Reviews of 28 Southwestern Species� Notice 5-year Review, Initiation

03/05/2003 68 FR 10485Notice of Availability of the Final Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Plan

� Notice Final Recovery PlanAvailability

10/10/2001 66 FR 51683 51684ETWP;Notice of Reopening the Comment Period for the Draft Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Plan for Review and Comment

� Notice Doc. Availability� Notice ReopenComment

06/06/2001 66 FR 30477 30478EWTP;Notice of Availability of the Draft Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Plan for Review and Comment

� Notice Doc. Availability

Current Critical Habitat Documents (Showing 5 of 5) Date Citation Page Title Document Type Status

08/15/2011 76 FR 50542 50629Designation of Revised Critical Habitat for Southwestern Willow Flycatcher: Proposed rule.

Proposed RuleNotRequired

10/19/2005 70 FR 60886 61009

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonaxtraillii extimus)

Final RuleFinal designated

10/12/2004 69 FR 60706 60786Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus)


07/22/1997 62 FR 39129 39147ETWP; Final Determination of Critical Habitat for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher

Final RuleNotRequired

07/23/1993 58 FR 39495 39522ETWP; Proposed Rule to List the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher as Endangered with Critical Habitat


Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP) (learn more) (Showing 5 of 22: view all)

HCP Plan SummariesCal. Dept. of Corrections Statewide Electrified Fence ProjectCedar River Watershed HCP



» Petitions

» Life History

Habitat Requirements

For nesting, requires dense riparian habitats with microclimatic conditions dictated by the local surroundings. Saturated soils, standing water, or nearby streams, pools, or cienegas are a component of nesting habitat that also influcences the microclimate and density of the vegetation component. Habitat not suitable for nesting may be used for migration and foraging.

Food Habits

Primarily flying insects

Clark County Multiple Species HCP (7 permittees)Coachella Valley Multi-Species HCPFieldstone/La Costa & City of Carlsbad

Safe Harbor Agreements (SHA): (learn more) (Showing 5 of 9: view all)

SHA Plan SummariesCrosswhite / EC Bar Ranch SHAOjai Valley Land ConservancyPahranagat Programmatic SHA in Lincoln County, NVPaterson, Thomas W. and Caroline H. (Spur Ranch)Pueblo of Santa Ana Amendment # 1

Candidate Conservation Agreements (CCA): (learn more) (Showing 1 of 1)

CCA Plan SummariesSpring Mountains National Recreation Area

Most Recent Petition Findings (Showing 2 of 2)Date Citation Page Title Finding

07/23/1993 58 FR 39495 39522ETWP; Proposed Rule to List the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher as Endangered with Critical Habitat

� Notice 12 month petition finding, Warranted� Proposed Critical Habitat, Critical habitat--birds� Proposed Listing, Endangered

09/01/1992 57 FR 39664ETWP; 90-Day Finding on Petition to List Southwestern Willow Flycatcher & Initiation of Status Review; 57 FR 39664

� Notice 90-day Petition Finding, Substantial



Primarily flying insects.

Movement / Home Range

The flycatcher is a summer breeder within its range in the United States. It is gone to wintering areas in Central America by the end of September. Nest territories are set up for breeding, and there is some site fidelity to nestterritories.

Reproductive Strategy

Arrives on breeding grounds in late April to early May. Nesting begins in late May and early June, with fledging from late June to mid-August. Typically lay 3-4 eggs per clutch, laid at one day intervals and are incubated by the female for about 12 days. Young birds fledge 12-13 days after hatching. Typically only raise one brood per year;however some pairs will raise a second brood, or renest after a nest failure.

Other

Loss and degradation of dense riparian habitats are the primary habitat threat to the flycatcher. Historically, water developments that altered flows in the rivers and streams were the primary threat. Now, with riparian areas limited and re-growth difficult due to changes in flows, fire is a significant risk to remaining habitats. Human disturbances at nesting sites may result in nest abandonment.

» Other Resources

NatureServe Explorer Species Reports -- NatureServe Explorer is a source for authoritative conservation information on more than 50,000 plants, animals and ecological communtities of the U.S and Canada.NatureServe Explorer provides in-depth information on rare and endangered species, but includes common plants and animals too. NatureServe Explorer is a product of NatureServe in collaboration with the Natural Heritage Network.

ITIS Reports -- ITIS (the Integrated Taxonomic Information System) is a source for authoritative taxonomic information on plants, animals, fungi, and microbes of North America and the world.


FWS Endangered Home | ECOS Home | Contact Us



Listed and Sensitive Species in Sandoval County

Species of Concern Species of Concern are included for planning purposes only.

Total number of species: 22 Print

Common Name Scientific Name Group Status

Yellow-billed cuckoo Coccyzus americanus Bird Candidate

Rio Grande cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis

Fish Candidate

New Mexican meadow jumping mouse

Zapus hudsonius luteus Mammal Candidate

Southwestern willow flycatcher Empidonax traillii extimus Bird Endangered

Rio Grande silvery minnow Designated Critical Habitat

Hybognathus amarus Fish Endangered

Black-footed ferret 2 Mustela nigripes Mammal Endangered

Mexican spotted owl Designated Critical Habitat

Strix occidentalis lucida Bird Threatened

Common Name Scientific Name Group Status

Jemez Mountains salamander Plethodon neomexicanus Amphibian Species of Concern

New Mexico silverspot butterfly Speyeria nokomis nitocris Arthropod - Invertebrate

Species of Concern

American peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus anatum Bird Species of Concern

Arctic peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus tundrius Bird Species of Concern

Baird's sparrow Ammodramus bairdii Bird Species of Concern

Mountain plover Charadrius montanus Bird Species of Concern

Northern goshawk Accipiter gentilis Bird Species of Concern

Western burrowing owl Athene cunicularia hypugaea

Bird Species of Concern

Page 1 of 2Listed and Sensitive Species in Sandoval County

10/7/2008http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/newmexico/SBC_view.cfm?spcnty=Sandoval

Rio Grande sucker Catostomus plebeius Fish Species of Concern

Goat Peak pika Ochotona princeps nigrescens

Mammal Species of Concern

Townsend's big-eared bat Corynorhinus townsendii Mammal Species of Concern

Gypsum phacelia Phacelia sp. nov. Plant Species of Concern

Gypsum townsendia Townsendia gypsophila Plant Species of Concern

Knight's milk-vetch Astragalus knightii Plant Species of Concern

Parish's alkali grass Puccinellia parishii Plant Species of Concern

Endangered Any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.

Threatened Any species which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.

Candidate Candidate Species (taxa for which the Service has sufficient information to propose that they be added to list of endangered and threatened species, but the listing action has been precluded by other higher priority listing activities).

Proposed Any species of fish, wildlife or plant that is proposed in the Federal Register to be listed under section 4 of the Act. This could be either proposed for endangered or threatened status.

Species of Concern

Taxa for which further biological research and field study are needed to resolve their conservation status OR are considered sensitive, rare, or declining on lists maintained by Natural Heritage Programs, State wildlife agencies, other Federal agencies, or professional/academic scientific societies. Species of Concern are included for planning purposes only.

Foot Notes: D Designated Critical Habitat. P Proposed Critical Habitat.

1 Introduced population. 3 Extirpated in this county.

2 Survey should be conducted if project involves impacts to prairie dog towns or complexes of 200-acres or more for the Gunnison's prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni) and/or 80-acres or more for any subspecies of Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus). A complex consists of two or more neighboring prairie dog towns within 4.3 miles (7 kilometers) of each other.

Page 2 of 2Listed and Sensitive Species in Sandoval County

10/7/2008http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/newmexico/SBC_view.cfm?spcnty=Sandoval

The Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act Collaborative Program Home

USFWS Privacy Statement

Welcome to the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act Collaborative Program

The Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Program (Program) is a partnership involving 20 current signatories (see box below) organized to protect and improve the status of endangered species along the Middle Rio Grande (MRG) of New Mexico while simultaneously protecting existing and future regional water uses. Two species of particular concern to the Program are the Rio Grande silvery minnow and the southwestern willow flycatcher.

During fiscal year 2004 Congress appropriated nearly $7 million for Program activities, while New Mexico State agencies provided more than $2 million for Program related projects. Program signatories and non-signatory participants contributed in-kind services that included land, access to land, personnel services and voluntary fish salvage efforts.

Given the ongoing drought, the Program prioritized funding of activities in fiscal year 2004 to meet multiple Program objectives:

1. Manage species to ensure survival through activities that augment silvery minnow populations.

2. Restore species habitat, through activities that focus on projects that provide high value to the silvery minnow, that can be constructed 'on the ground' within two years, that are constructed upstream of the Isleta Diversion structure; and that have completed designs and permits in place.

3. Seek funding to acquire water to meet the flow requirements listed in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2003 Biological Opinion (BO), and implement supporting measures for water management to meet the long-term goal of a sustainable river.

The Program accomplished the following 2004 objectives:

1. The USFWS March 2003 BO limit on silvery minnows killed was not exceeded;

2. the upper reaches of the MRG were augmented with over a hundred thousand silvery minnows;

3. 12,865 silvery minnows were salvaged and relocated in 2004;

4. the USFWS March 2003 BO river flow targets were met; and

5. a number of habitat restoration projects were planned for the Albuquerque reach of the Rio Grande. Long-term restoration efforts include projects on river and bosque habitat throughout the MRG.

Recent Program Accomplishments:

● With the Santa Ana and Sandia pueblos, the Program has funded and implemented habitat restoration efforts that include a focus on the eradication of invasive saltcedar and other non-native species and the planting of native grasses and trees, with the goal to create diverse habitat for native plants and animals while reducing hazardous vegetative fuels that increase catastrophic risk to habitat as well as local residences.

● The Program, through the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission (NMISC), completed a Long- Term Habitat Restoration Plan. This plan provides a framework to implement and integrate actions needed to

:31 AMfile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Rene/Desktop...0Grande%20Endangered%20Species%20Act%20%20Prog.htm (1 of 2)10/18/2006 11:16

http://www.fws.gov/mrgesacp/index.cfm

http://www.fws.gov/mrgesacp/contact.cfm

http://www.fws.gov/mrgesacp/calendar.cfm

http://search.fws.gov/index.html?ul=http://mrgesacp.fws.gov/

http://www.fws.gov/help/policies.html

The Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act Collaborative Program Home

2005 Program Signatories:

Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority Alliance for the Rio Grande Heritage Assessment Payers Association of the MRGCD City of Albuquerque Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District National Association of Industrial and Office Properties New Mexico Attorney General Office New Mexico Department of Agriculture New Mexico Department of Game and Fish New Mexico Environment Department New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission Pueblo of Isleta Pueblo of Sandia Rio Grande Restoration Rio Grande Water Rights Association U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 U.S. Forest Service - Rocky Mountain Research Station University of New Mexico

address water, bosque, and endangered species management issues along the MRG. Its framework will guide efforts to solicit, review, and implement habitat restoration proposals intending to create long-term, self-sustaining habitat for the silvery minnow and the flycatcher. The plan also provides a technical resource for developing and assessing most Program-funded restoration projects.

● In 2003, a $1.7 million state-of-the-art facility was built for the breeding and rearing of silvery minnows in captivity. The City of Albuquerque Biological Park provided the land and is providing staff to manage and operate the Naturalized Refugium (refugium) with support from the NMISC. In 2004, captive spawns at the refugium produced 197,000 eggs, with an additional 150,000 eggs produced by hormone-induced spawns.

:31 AMfile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Rene/Desktop...0Grande%20Endangered%20Species%20Act%20%20Prog.htm (2 of 2)10/18/2006 11:16

MRGEASCP - The Southwestern Willow Flycatcher


The Southwestern Willow Flycatcher

The 5 Â¾-inch flycatcher breeds and rears it chicks in late spring and through the summer in New Mexico's dense riparian vegetation along streams, rivers, wetlands and reservoirs and in other arid southwestern states. In the fall, the flycatcher makes a strenuous migration thousands of miles to Mexico, Central, and possibly northern South America for the winter. When spring comes the flycatcher reverses its course and returns to our state hoping to find a suitable home for building its nest.

The flycatcher was added to the endangered species list in 1995 because its populations had declined primarily due to habitat loss. Changes in river and water management, residential and urban development; recreation; and livestock and wild ungulate overgrazing took its toll on habitat used during the breeding season.

The Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Program has undertaken riparian habitat restoration projects along the Rio Grande. By protecting the flycatcher and repairing its breeding habitat, the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher may recover its populations to a healthy level.

Click here to listen to the bird's call.

Facts

Rule Establishing Endangered Status

Critical Habitat (Draft)

Recovery Plan

Survey Protocols

AMfile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Rene/Desktop/SW...CP%20-%20The%20Southwestern%20Willow%20Flycatcher.htm10/18/2006 11:16:35






http://www.usgs.nau.edu/swwf/wiflvocl.html

http://arizonaes.fws.gov/Documents/DocumentsBySpecies/SouthwesternWillowFlycatcher/SWWFC2.pdf

http://arizonaes.fws.gov/Documents/DocumentsBySpecies/SouthwesternWillowFlycatcher/wifllistingendangered.pdf

http://arizonaes.fws.gov/SWWFFINALRecPlan.htm

http://www.usgs.nau.edu/swwf/wiflnew.html

MRGEASCP - The Rio Grande Silvery Minnow


The Rio Grande Silvery Minnow

The Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathusamarus/silvery minnow) is a stout minnow with moderately small eyes and a small, slightly oblique mouth. Adults may reach up to four inches in total length. Life color is silver with emerald reflections and fins are plain. Its dorsal fin is distinctly pointed. The silvery minnow currently exists in the Middle Rio Grande from Cochiti Dam downstream to the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir, New Mexico.

Historically, the silvery minnow was among the most abundant and widespread fishes in the Rio Grande Basin, found from EspaÃ±ola, N.M., to the Gulf of Mexico. It also was an inhabitant of the Pecos River, from Santa Rosa, N.M. to where the Pecos meets the Rio Grande in west Texas. Collection data indicate the species presently occupies about five percent of its historic range and is no longer present in the Pecos River or in the Rio Grande below Elephant Butte Reservor.

Mfile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Rene/Desktop/S...ASCP%20-%20The%20Rio%20Grande%20Silvery%20Minnow.htm10/18/2006 11:16:37 A






Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow; Final Rule

February 19, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 33)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 8087-8135]

Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow; Final Rule

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule: notice of availability.

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), designate critical habitat for the Rio Grande silvery minnow (Hybognathus amarus) (silvery minnow), an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).

On June 6, 2002, we proposed that 212 miles (mi) (339 kilometers (km)) be designated as critical habitat for the silvery minnow.

The silvery minnow critical habitat designation in the Rio Grande extends from Cochiti Dam, Sandoval County, New Mexico (NM) downstream to the utility line crossing the Rio Grande, a permanent identified landmark in Socorro County, NM, a total of approximately 157 mi (252 km), referred to as the "middle Rio Grande.''

The designation also includes the tributary Jemez River from Jemez Canyon Dam in NM to the upstream boundary of Santa Ana Pueblo, which is not included. The critical habitat designation defines the lateral extent (width) as those areas bounded by existing levees or, in areas without levees, 300 feet (ft) (91.4 meters (m)) of riparian zone adjacent to each side of the bankfull stage of the middle Rio Grande.

The Pueblo lands of Santo Domingo, Santa Ana, Sandia, and Isleta within this area are not included in the final critical habitat designation.

Except for these areas, the final remaining portion of the silvery minnow's occupied range in the middle Rio Grande in NM is being designated as critical habitat.

This publication also provides notice of the availability of the final economic analysis and the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this final rule.

This final rule and EIS are being issued pursuant to a court order.

On November 21, 2000, the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, in Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District v. Babbitt, 206 F. Supp. 2d 1156 (D.N.M. 2000), set aside the July 6, 1999, critical habitat designation for the minnow and ordered us to issue both an EIS pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and a new proposed rule designating critical habitat for the silvery minnow.

DATES: This final rule is effective March 21, 2003.

ADDRESSES: Comments and materials received, as well as supporting documentation used in the preparation of this final rule, are available for public inspection, by

appointment, during normal business hours at the New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, 2105 Osuna Road NE, Albuquerque, NM 87113.

You may obtain copies of the final rule, the economic analysis, or the final EIS from the field office address above or by calling 505-346-2525. All documents are also available from our Web site at http://ifw2es.fws.gov/Library/

If you would like copies of the regulations on listed wildlife or have questions about prohibitions and permits, contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Endangered Species, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, NM 87103.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Field Supervisor, New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office (see ADDRESSES section above); telephone: 505-346-2525. Division of Endangered Species (see ADDRESSES section above); telephone 505-248-6920; facsimile 505-248-6788.

New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office

2105 Osuna NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113

Phone: (505) 346-2525 Fax: (505) 346-2542

Thank you for your recent request for information on threatened or endangered species or important wildlife habitats that may occur in your project area. The New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office has posted lists of the endangered, threatened, proposed, candidate and species of concern occurring in all New Mexico Counties on the Internet. Please refer to the following web page for species information in the county where your project occurs: http://ifw2es.fws.gov/NewMexico/SBC_intro.cfm. If you do not have access to the Internet or have difficulty obtaining a list, please contact our office and we will mail or fax you a list as soon as possible. After opening the web page, find New Mexico Listed and Sensitive Species Lists on the main page and click on the county of interest. Your project area may not necessarily include all or any of these species. This information should assist you in determining which species may or may not occur within your project area. Under the Endangered Species Act, as amended (Act), it is the responsibility of the Federal action agency or its designated representative to determine if a proposed action "may affect" endangered, threatened, or proposed species, or designated critical habitat, and if so, to consult with us further. Similarly, it is their responsibility to determine if a proposed action has no effect to endangered, threatened, or proposed species, or designated critical habitat. If your action area has suitable habitat for any of these species, we recommend that species-specific surveys be conducted during the flowering season for plants and at the appropriate time for wildlife to evaluate any possible project-related impacts. Please keep in mind that the scope of federally listed species compliance also includes any interrelated or interdependent project activities (e.g., equipment staging areas, offsite borrow material areas, or utility relocations) and any indirect or cumulative effects. Candidates and species of concern have no legal protection under the Act and are included on the web site for planning purposes only. We monitor the status of these species. If significant declines are detected, these species could potentially be listed as endangered or threatened. Therefore, actions that may contribute to their decline should be avoided. We recommend that candidates and species of concern be included in your surveys. Also on the web site, we have included additional wildlife-related information that should be considered if your project is a specific type. These include communication towers, power line safety for raptors, road and highway improvements and/or construction, spring developments and livestock watering facilities, wastewater facilities, and trenching operations.

http://ifw2es.fws.gov/NewMexico/SBC_intro.cfm

2

Under Executive Orders 11988 and 11990, Federal agencies are required to minimize the destruction, loss, or degradation of wetlands and floodplains, and preserve and enhance their natural and beneficial values. We recommend you contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for permitting requirements under section 404 of the Clean Water Act if your proposed action could impact floodplains or wetlands. These habitats should be conserved through avoidance, or mitigated to ensure no net loss of wetlands function and value. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the taking of migratory birds, nests, and eggs, except as permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. To minimize the likelihood of adverse impacts to all birds protected under the MBTA, we recommend construction activities occur outside the general migratory bird nesting season of March through August, or that areas proposed for construction during the nesting season be surveyed, and when occupied, avoided until nesting is complete. We suggest you contact the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, and the New Mexico Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department, Forestry Division for information regarding fish, wildlife, and plants of State concern. Thank you for your concern for endangered and threatened species and New Mexico’s wildlife habitats. We appreciate your efforts to identify and avoid impacts to listed and sensitive species in your project area. Sincerely, Brian Hanson Acting Field Supervisor

1

Historical Preservation Index By State County report

Row County Resource Name Address City Listed Multiple

1 Sandoval Abenicio Salazar Historic District U.S. 85 Bernalillo 6/6/1980

2 Sandoval Amoxiumqua Site (FS-530, LA481)

Address Restricted

Jemez Springs 5/21/1984

Jemez Springs Pueblo Sites TR

3 Sandoval Archeological Site FS-18, LA-5920

Address Restricted




Address Restricted



5 Sandoval Archeological Site FS-3

Address Restricted




Address Restricted




Address Restricted




Address Restricted




Address Restricted




Address Restricted




Address Restricted




Address Restricted




Address Restricted




Address Restricted



15 Sandoval

Archeological Site No. AR-03-10-03-620

Address Restricted


Jemez Cultural Developments in North-Central New Mexico MPS

16 Sandoval

Astialakwa Archeological District (FS-360, LA-1825)

Address Restricted



17 Sandoval Bandelier CCC Historic District Off NM 4

Bandelier National Monument 5/28/1987

2

Row County Resource Name Address City Listed Multiple

18 Sandoval Bandelier National Monument

12 mi. S of Los Alamos on NM 4

Los Alamos 10/15/1966

19 Sandoval Big Bead Mesa Address Restricted

Casa Salazar 10/15/1966

20 Sandoval Boletsakwa Site (FS-2, LA-136)

Address Restricted



21 Sandoval Borrego Mesa Agricultural Site

Address Restricted


Jemez Cultural Developments in North-Central New Mexico MPS

Rio Rancho Weather

US Geography / US Weather / New Mexico Weather / Rio Rancho

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Avg. High

46° 54° 61° 70° 78° 90° 92° 88° 81° 71° 57° 47°

Avg. Low 21° 26° 32° 38° 48° 58° 64° 62° 55° 44° 31° 24°

Mean 34° 40° 47° 55° 64° 74° 78° 76° 68° 57° 44° 35°

Avg. Precip.

0.4 in 0.5 in 0.5 in 0.5 in 0.5 in 0.6 in 1.4 in 1.6 in 1.0 in 0.9 in 0.4 in 0.5 in

Degrees in Fahrenheit

http://countrystudies.us/united-states/geography.htm

http://countrystudies.us/united-states/weather/

http://countrystudies.us/united-states/weather/new-mexico/

Copyright © and (P) 1988–2012 Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.com/streets/Certain mapping and direction data © 2012 NAVTEQ. All rights reserved. The Data for areas of Canada includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities, including: © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, © Queen's Printer for Ontario. NAVTEQ and NAVTEQ ON BOARD are trademarks of NAVTEQ. © 2012 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. Tele Atlas and Tele Atlas North America are trademarks of Tele Atlas, Inc. © 2012 by Applied Geographic Solutions. All rights reserved. Portions © Copyright 2012 by Woodall Publications Corp. All rights reserved.

Harvey Jones Channel Location Map

0 mi 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Copyright © and (P) 1988–2012 Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.com/streets/Certain mapping and direction data © 2012 NAVTEQ. All rights reserved. The Data for areas of Canada includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities, including: © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, © Queen's Printer for Ontario. NAVTEQ and NAVTEQ ON BOARD are trademarks of NAVTEQ. © 2012 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. Tele Atlas and Tele Atlas North America are trademarks of Tele Atlas, Inc. © 2012 by Applied Geographic Solutions. All rights reserved. Portions © Copyright 2012 by Woodall Publications Corp. All rights reserved.

Harvey Jones Channel Rec Waters

0 mi 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

1

BMP Phasing Page For Harvey Jones Channel Improvements Ph. 2

BMP Used When Installed Dirt Berm The berms will be created as indicated on the ESCP map before site

operations begin. They will be maintained in good working condition through out the project and will serve as the primary BMPs for the site.