STOCHASTIC RAINFALL DOWNSCALING FOR CLIMATE MODELS THE PROBLEM OF SCALES: MISMATCH BETWEEN THE...
If you can't read please download the document
STOCHASTIC RAINFALL DOWNSCALING FOR CLIMATE MODELS THE PROBLEM OF SCALES: MISMATCH BETWEEN THE RESOLUTION OF CLIMATE MODELS AND THE SCALES NEEDED FOR IMPACT
STOCHASTIC RAINFALL DOWNSCALING FOR CLIMATE MODELS THE PROBLEM
OF SCALES: MISMATCH BETWEEN THE RESOLUTION OF CLIMATE MODELS AND
THE SCALES NEEDED FOR IMPACT STUDIES Elisa Palazzi 28/08/2012
Institute of the Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, CNR, Torino
Slide 2
Introduction & outline Precipitation is a key component of
the hydrological cycle and one of the most important parameters for
a range of natural and socioeconomic systems. The study of
consequences of global climate change on these systems requires
scenarios of future precipitation change at the local scale as
input to impact models. Direct application of output from GCMs and
RCMs is inadequate because of the coarse spatial resolution and
limited representation of mesoscale atmospheric processes,
topography, and land-sea distribution. Of particular concern with
precipitation, GCMs exhibit a much larger spatial scale than is
usually needed in impact studies and this leads to inconsistencies
in rainfall statistics, extremes and small-scale variability,
particularly in the presence of complex terrain and heterogeneous
orography.
Slide 3
Techniques have been developed to downscale information from
GCMs (RCMs) to regional (local) scales. (Dynamical, statistical and
stochastic downscaling) In the absence of full deterministic
modelling of small-scale rainfall, stochastic downscaling
techniques generate ensembles of possible realizations of small
scale rainfall fields starting from a smoother distribution on
larger scale. Small scale fields are consistent with the large
scale features of the coarse field and the known statistical
properties of the small-scale rainfall fields. Stochastic
downscaling is not a substitute for physically-based dynamical
models, also used to better understand rainfall dynamics; it is a
way to introduce variability at scales not resolved by physical
models. Introduction & outline
Slide 4
Modelling chain: bridging the gap Global Climate Models Global
Reanalyses Global Climate Models Global Reanalyses Regional Climate
Models High-resolution Climate Scenarios Dynamical downscaling
Stochastic downscaling Future projections of water availability
Flood forecasting, etc. Model-measurement comparison Hydrological
models Rainfall-runoff models Hydrological models Rainfall-runoff
models few km 10-30 km 100-120 km non-hydrostatic hydrostatic
Slide 5
- The most advanced tools currently available for simulating
the global climate system (physical processes in the atmosphere,
ocean, cryosphere and land surface, and their interactions) and the
response of the global climate system to anthropogenic and natural
forcings. - Spatial Resolution: 100-120 km GCMs - GCMs spatial
resolution is too coarse to capture the local aspects (smooth
topography)and it is limited by computational resources. - The
sub-grid physical processes have to be parameterized.
Parameterization is a way of describing the aggregated effect of
sub-grid processes over a larger scale. Parameterization is one
source of uncertainty in simulations of current/future climate. ~
500 km ~ 110 km
Slide 6
GCMs: EC-Earth, spatial res. 1.125
Slide 7
An important field: Rainfall convective cells Synoptic scale
mesoscale structures - Highly non-homogeneous phenomenon -
Phenomenon organized in hierarchic structures (scaling property of
rainfall) Convective scale (or microscale) 0-20 km (convective
cells characterized by high precipitation intensity and short
duration) embedded within Mesoscale 20-200 km (clusters of lower
precipitation intensity) embedded within Synoptic scale > 1000
km (scale of the general circulation) - Highly intermittent in
space and time (alternating between dry and rainy periods). No
interpolation (nearest neighbors, linear interpolation,
distance-weighted interpolation) is possible.
Slide 8
Need for downscaling - Climate model simulations/predictions
need to be generated at finer scales than those of GCMs if their
results are to be of use - The need is for regional climate
scenarios but the most complete models are the coupled GCMs 1) One
solution is to employ EMICs, developed to emphasize particular
aspects of the climate system. 2) Another is to run the full GCM at
a finer resolution (or enhanced resolution in the regions of
interest). This would require a very powerful computer (such as the
Earth Simulator in Japan) or a very short simulation period (time
slice, e.g. 5 years)
Slide 9
Downscaling - generating locally relevant data from GCMs. 3)
Another is to downscale climate data: a strategy for generating
locally relevant data from GCMs. Downscaling can be done in several
ways. Three categories: - Dynamical downscaling - Statistical
downscaling - Stochastic downscaling
Slide 10
Dynamical Downscaling Nesting a RCM into an existing GCM. RCMs
work by increasing the resolution of the GCM in a limited area
(e.g., the size of western Europe, or southern Africa). They need
the climate (temperature, wind etc.) calculated by the GCM as
boundary conditions (large scale driving factors) for the regional
simulation. WRF, RAMS, ROMS, COSMO-CLM, PROTHEUS, RegCM, etc. RCMs
can represent the effects of mountains, coastlines, changing
vegetation characteristics on the weather much better than GCMs.
They can provide weather and climate information at resolutions as
fine as 50 km to 20 km.
Slide 11
Predicted changes in winter precipitation over Europe between
the present day and 2080. Large reductions over the Alps and
Pyrenees are predicted by the RCM (right), but not the GCM (left)
RCMs vs GCMs - simulate/predict climate/climate changes more
realistically, with more detail and with regional differences - are
much better at simulating and predicting changes to extremes of
weather Dynamical Downscaling
Slide 12
Statistical Downscaling Use of statistical regressions. These
techniques assume that the relationship between large scale climate
variables (e.g. grid box rainfall and pressure) and the actual
rainfall measured at one particular raingauge will always be the
same. So, if that relationship is known for current climate, the
GCM projections of future climate can be used to predict how the
rainfall measured at that raingauge will change in the future.
Wilby et al, WRR 1998
Slide 13
Stochastic Downscaling Generates stochastic ensembles of
small-scale predictions from the output of atmospheric models or
from a measured field with a coarse spatial or temporal resolution,
using different approaches, e.g.: - Random distribution of rain
cells - Multifractal cascades based on the theory of scaling in
rainfall - Nonlinearly transformed spectral models (Ferraris et
al., 2003 comparison of the various methods and their skill)
Suitable for precipitation The precipitation fields generated by
stochastic procedures are consistent with the large-scale features
imposed by meteorological forecast, as the total rainfall volume,
and with the known statistical properties of precipitation at
multiple scales.
Slide 14
Rainfall Filtered Auto Regressive Model (RainFARM) It belongs
to the family of Metagaussian models, based on nonlinearly
filtering the output of a linear autoregressive process, whose
properties are derived from the information available at the large
scales. Extrapolates the large-scale spatio-temporal power spectrum
of the meteorological predictions to the small, unresolved scales.
The basic idea is to preserve amplitude and phases of the original
field at the scales at which we are confident in the limited area
meteorological model prediction and to reconstruct the Fourier
spectrum at the smaller (unreliable, unresolved) scales. It is able
to reproduce the small-scale statistics of the precipitation
scaling properties of the main statistical moments, spatiotemporal
correlation structure of the fields, etc. and capture the temporal
persistence of the observed precipitation at the scales smaller
than the reliability scales. RainFARM procedure Rebora et al., J.
Hydrometeorol., 2006
Slide 15
Input field (model output) Fourier spectrum -Space-time power
spectrum (assume a power low form), and estimate or fix the
spectral slopes ; ; Fourier and power spectrum extrapolated at
lower scales, with random phases ( g: gaussian field obtained by
inverting Synthetic precipitation field, obtained by a nonlinear
tranformation of g RainFARM procedure in detail
Slide 16
To force the output field r t be equal to P on scaled larger
than the confidence scales, we coarse-grain the field L 0, T 0
Finally, we obtain the output of the downscaling procedure, r, with
resolution and , by imposing: r = P, aggregating on L 0, T 0 The
stochastic nature of the downscaled field, r, is associated with
the choice of a set of random Fourier phases (different phases
different realizations) RainFARM procedure in detail
Slide 17
RainFARM - summary P (input) = predicted or measured
large-scale precipitation field L 0, T 0 = reliable spatial and
temporal scales r (output)= one stochastic realization of the
smmal- scale precipitation field = spatial and temporal scales (
20mm. The black boxes represent the PROTHEUS domain. The area
between the inner and outer box is where PROTHEUS is nudged to the
lateral boundary conditions.
Slide 59
Open question Stochastic downscaling has been devised to work
on space scales between about 30 km and 1 km, and on time scales
between about 3 hr and 10 minutes: WHAT HAPPENS ON LARGER OR
SMALLER SCALES?