Upload
tovah
View
17
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Steven L. Britton and Lauren Gerard Koch Functional Genomics Laboratory Medical College of Ohio Toledo, Ohio. Genetic Models of Low and High Aerobic Capacity. Nature 291:381, 1981. From Alberts, et al, Molecular Biology of the Cell. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Steven L. Britton
and
Lauren Gerard Koch
Functional Genomics Laboratory
Medical College of Ohio
Toledo, Ohio
Genetic Models of Low and High
Aerobic Capacity
Nature 291:381, 1981
From Alberts, et al, Molecular Biology of the Cell
Photosynthesis
Created Atmospheric Oxygen(increased redox potential more free energy)
Created a Permissive Environment for Evolution of Complex Aerobic Pathways
Current Aerobic Capacity
-3.5 Billion Years
Evolutionary Time
Aerobic Capacity Defines Much Of Our Biological Existence
Aerobic
Capacity
Cancer
Diabetes
Mellitus
Heart
Failure
Aging
Aerobic Capacity Has An Ubiquitous Influence
(axiomatic from our evolutionary history)
Current
Aerobic = Intrinsic + Adaptational
Phenotype
Sedentary,
Untrained
Response to
Training
Assumption
Model One:
Artificial Selection for
Intrinsic Aerobic Endurance
Treadmill Running Capacity
From McCardle, Katch and Katch, 1996
Columbus Instruments four lane
1
2
3
4
treadmill
shock grid 15 degrees
RAT ENDURANCE RUN TO EXHAUSTION
5
10
15
20
25
30
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Duration of Run (min)
Sp
ee
d (
m/m
in)
Speed-Ramped ProtocolStart = 10 m/minIncreased 1 m every 2 min
“Average” rat
exhausted at
23 min
N:NIH Stock Has Wide Genetic Heterogeneity Created by outcrossing these 8 inbred strains
Strains were estimated to differ widely
• MR (Maudsely Reactive)
• WN (Wistar Normotensive)
• WKY (Wistar Kyoto)
• M520 (Marshall)
• F344 (Fischer)
• ACI (August x Copenhagen)
• BN (Brown Norway)
• BUF (Buffalo)
Originated by Carl Hansen and Karen Spuhler at the NIH in 1979. Maintained by the NIH as a resource (Carl Hansen).
Founder Population Rats Were N:NIH Stock
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Dis
tan
ce
Ru
n (
me
ters
)
88 Females
80 Males
Thirteen mating pairs that started the high selected line
Thirteen mating pairs that started the low selected line
Founder Population Ranked from Low to High Capacity
Founder Population Running Capacity
205 m
167 m
633 m
541 m
f
Distance
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 500 1000 1500 2000
FounderPopulation
n=168
05
101520253035
Generation 5
05
101520253035
Frequency
Selection Across 10 Generations
Meters Run at Exhaustion
Generation 5
n=250
Generation 10
n=310
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Generation
Dis
tan
ce
Ru
n t
o E
xh
au
sti
on
(m
ete
rs)
HCRy = 37x + 540r = 0.322n = 1385p < 0.001
LCRy = -17x + 388r = 0.368n = 1204p < 0.001
317%
Response to Selection
45
50
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Distance Run to Exhaustion (m)
Tim
e (m
in)
Ramped Running Protocol:Time Vs Distance
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Aerobic
Lactate Threshold Exhaustion
Founder Population Average Run
duration = 23 min
distance = 355 m
speed = 21 m/min
45
50
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Distance Run to Exhaustion (m)
Tim
e (
min
)
Ramped Running Protocol: Time Vs Distance
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Founder
Low
High
217 355 904
Low y = 4.2x + 279R = 0.90
Highy = -1.1x + 266R = 0.33
Lowy = 3.3x + 178R = 0.93
Highy = -1.1x + 179R = 0.79
150
200
250
300
350
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Generation
Bo
dy W
eig
ht
(gra
ms)
Male
Female
Low Capacity Gained and High Capacity Lost Weight)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
G1 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G2 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G3 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G4 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G5 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G6 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G7 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G8 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G9 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G10 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G11 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
168 Founders
26 Low Parents 26 High Parents
Thirteen LCR Families
The entire parental DNA (II) architecture is archived
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
G1 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G2 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G3 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G4 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G5 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G6 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G7 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G8 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G9 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G10 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
G11 IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
168 Founders
26 Low Parents 26 High Parents
Thirteen HCR Families
The entire parental DNA (II) architecture is archived
Likely Determinant Phenotype
HCR are higher than LCR for:
1. Isolated Cardiac Output (John Barbato).
2. Cardiac left ventricular myosin ATPase activity (John Barbato).
3. Cardiac left ventricular Na+/K+ ATPase (Joseph Shapiro).
4. Stress Proteins (HSP 70 inducible) in heart and skeletal muscle (Ed Sanchez
and Todd Brickman).
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
LCR HCR
Hea
t S
hoc
k P
rote
in 7
0iLeft VentricleSedentary Rats
Other Selectivley-Bred Models in Development
1. Adaptational response to endurance training
2. Sensorimotor capacity (coordination)
Long-term, we want to make these models available for others to study.
[The NIH has provided resources to make the
Intrinsic Aerobic Rats available for small-scale studies].
We have collaborations with 10 institutions, but no formal,
systematic plans for studying these models.
Pennington Bouchard
UCSD Wagner
U Kansas Gonzales
Laval (Can.) St. Amand
Yale Neuffer
U. Norway U. Wisloff
UCSF T. Kurtz
Copenhagen T. Clausen
Mayo E. Ritman
USDA L. Klevay
End