23
arge-scale irregular ndulations of the onosphere as bserved by the alkland Islands uperDARN radar E. Milan, A. Grocott, M. Lester, K. Yeoman, M. P. Freeman, and G. Chisham

[email protected] Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

Large-scale irregularundulations of theionosphere asobserved by theFalkland IslandsSuperDARN radarS. E. Milan, A. Grocott, M. Lester,T. K. Yeoman, M. P. Freeman, and G. Chisham

Page 2: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

[email protected]

Auroral scatter

Subauroral electrodynamics

South Atlantic Anomaly

Vertical coupling

Gravity waves

Orographic gravity waves

Mesospheric winds and tides

Page 3: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

[email protected]

First light, 14th Feb 2010

Expected removal ofelectronics, Sept 2011

Very modest amountsof ionospheric scatter

Ionospheric motions

Page 6: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

Page 14: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

Dskip ray

radar operating frequency fr

ionospheric critical frequency fc

h

Secant law ccr ff sec

Skip distance

fc

[email protected]

Page 15: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

Dskip ray

radar operating frequency fr

fc

ionospheric critical frequency fc

h

Secant law ccr ff sec

Skip distanceskip distance S

proportional to h

dt

dh

dt

dScsec2

S21S2

1

[email protected]

Page 16: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

Dskip ray

a particular range gate corresponds to a ray with a fixed path length

h

Range gate

fc

[email protected]

Page 17: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

Dskip ray

h

Range gatea particular range gate corresponds to a ray with a fixed path length

as the ionosphere lifts, the ray footprint movestowards the radar; the motion relative to surfacefeatures produce a Doppler shift apparentlyaway from the radar

dt

dhdt

dR

dt

Pd

sin2

cos2

R

fc

[email protected]

Page 18: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

dt

dh

dt

Pd

sin2

dt

dh

dt

dScsec2

54sin

sec

c

dt

Pd

dt

dS

skip distance ground range

fc is associated with skip ray, D appropriate for a particular range gate

At further ranges, D decreases and the ratio increases

This decrease in Doppler shift with range is observed

Observations consistent with ascent and descent ofthe ionosphere with an amplitude of ±50 [email protected]

Page 21: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)
Page 22: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)
Page 23: steve.milan@ion.le.ac.uk Wot, no interferometer? Milan et al. (1997)

ConclusionsFIR observes irregular undulations of the ionosphere;

ionospheric motions may be ±50 km in altitude(test with ray tracing?)

They appear predominantly at night; more needs tobe done to understand the propagation mode(e.g. ray tracing)

Tend to occur as pairs of positive-then-negative,towards-then-away motions

In contrast, most gravity waves are observed onthe dayside

The appearance of undulations may be related togeomagnetic activity, in two casespossibly associated with solar wind [email protected]