Stephane Larocque – Consulting Practice Leader, Impact Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK...
If you can't read please download the document
Stephane Larocque – Consulting Practice Leader, Impact Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 1 ST INTERNATIONAL
Stephane Larocque Consulting Practice Leader, Impact
Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 1 ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
TRANSPORT & HEALTH July 7 th, 2015
Slide 2
ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS 2
Slide 3
Financial Analysis (FA): An assessment of the impact of an
option on the decision-making organization's own financial costs
and revenues. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis(LCCA): A process for
evaluating the total economic cost of an asset by analyzing initial
costs and discounted future expenditures, such as operations,
maintenance, and repair over the service life of the asset. Does
not account for benefits. Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA): An
assessment of the costs of alternative options, which all achieve
the same objective. The costs need not be restricted to purely
financial. The costs are framed as a ratio to a parameter.
Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA): Establishes preferences between
options by reference to an explicit set of objectives that the
decision-making body has identified, and for which it has
established measurable criteria to assess the extent to which the
objectives have been achieved. Quantitative, not monetary.
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA): An assessment of alternative options,
which quantifies in monetary terms as many of the costs and
benefits of a proposal as feasible, including items for which the
market does not provide a satisfactory measure of economic value.
COMMON TYPES OF FORMAL DECISION FRAMEWORKS 3
Slide 4
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE ANALYSIS Triple Bottom Line Analysis
promotes decision-making armed with relevant information from a
variety of PERSPECTIVES: Includes Financial, Social and
Environmental Impacts; Considers costs and benefits based on
multiple criteria; Addresses multiple, conflicting objectives;
Provides clear, defensible, well-documented results; Identifies key
risks; and Incorporates uncertainty in costs and benefits.
Sustainable development is typically defined as the pattern of
development that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own
needs 4
Slide 5
SUSTAINABLE RETURN ON INVESTMENT ANALYSIS SROI combines
best-practices in CBA, financial analysis, and LCCA methodologies,
augmented by: Accounting for uncertainty using state-of-the-art
risk analysis techniques EconomicSocial Environmental Triple Bottom
Line Business Case 5
Slide 6
SROI FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW 6
Slide 7
SUSTAINABLE RETURN ON INVESTMENT (SROI): TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE
VALUATION FRAMEWORK Monetary valuation of Triple Bottom Line Best
economics methods Proven method in multiple contexts Applicable for
program, project level decisions Accounts for Risk and Uncertainty
Systematic process for calculating and comparing benefits and costs
of a project to justify an investment or compare projects. The SROI
process accounts for a projects triple bottom line its full range
of financial, environmental, and social impacts. 7
Slide 8
THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE FRAMEWORK SROI adds to traditional
financial analysis the monetized value of non-cash benefits and
externalities 8
Slide 9
MONETIZING SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DATA SOURCES FOR
SOCIAL COST OF CARBON (CO 2 ) Includes (but not limited to):
Changes in net agricultural productivity; Human health impacts;
Property damage from increased flood risk; and The value of
ecosystem services due to climate change 163 peer-reviewed values
of the Social Cost of Carbon collected by HDR (1991- 2013) Range of
values addresses the large degree of uncertainty found within and
among CO 2 estimation studies 9
Slide 10
MONETIZING SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS SOCIAL COST OF
GREEN HOUSE GASES 10
Slide 11
Need to Automate & Standardize 11
Slide 12
THE SROI PROCESS IS COMPLEX Probabilistic Assessment:
Establishing Ranges for Inputs and Produce Risk-Adjusted Outcomes
Monte Carlo Analysis: repeated random sampling to compute or
iterate the project cost or schedule many times using input values
selected at random from the probability distributions of possible
costs or durations, to calculate a distribution of possible total
project cost or outcomes. 12
Slide 13
CASE STUDY 1: Capital Metro Austin, Texas - USA 13
Slide 14
AUSTIN CAP METRO ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED 14
Slide 15
AUSTIN CAPITAL METRO IMPACTS MONETIZED 15
Slide 16
AUSTIN CAP METRO RESULTS 16
Slide 17
FREE BUSINESS CASE EVALUATOR EXCEL BASED AND FULLY DOCUMENTED
17
Slide 18
Introducing AutoCASE 18
Slide 19
CASE STUDY 2: New York City Transit New York, New York - USA
19
Slide 20
DEMO OF AUTOCASE MONETIZED TBL SOFTWARE NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT
CASE STUDY 20 NYCT Mother Clara Hale Bus Depot Harlem, New York
Comprehensive business case on the green roof and related features
associated with a $262 million bus depot Cloud based AutoCASE
software used to evaluate the green roof Prove automated cost
benefit and risk analysis as a substitute for expensive custom
studies Calculates present day financial + social + environmental
returns in dollar units allocated across five different
stakeholders groups. This sustainable project was more expensive
from a financial perspective, however, the social and environmental
benefits made up for that extra cost.