Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STEP into Value: Deriving Outcomes from HIT
Pat Wise, MA, MS, FHIMSS, COL (USA ret’d)
Vice President, HIS, HIMSS
Pat Wise
RN, MA, MS, FHIMSS COL (USA ret'd)
Vice President, HIS
HIMSS Health IT Value Suite
Conflict of Interest
COL Patricia Wise, RN, MA, MS, FHIMSS (USA ret’d)
Has no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Agenda
• Review the Value Suite
• Discuss STEPS Model
• “AH-HA” Moment
• Introduce the Value Score
• Methodology for Measuring Value
Learning Objectives
• Define the STEPS framework
• Explore the HIMSS Value Score and Scoring Methodology
• Discuss best practices for utilizing the Value Score for quantifying your
organization’s HIT value realization
Data from HIMSS Analytics® Database © 2015 HIMSS Analytics
1.0% 4.1%
25.4%
34.6%
10.3%
17.3%
3.4%
1.8%
3.1%
2.8%
3.7%
10.3%
49.7%
15.4%
6.7%
10.5%
2010 Q3 2015 Q3
N = 5233 N = 5454
Complete EMR, CCD transactions to share data; Data warehousing; Data continuity with ED, ambulatory, OP
Physician documentation (structured templates), full CDSS (variance & compliance), Closed loop medication administration
Full R-PACS
CPOE, Clinical Decision Support (clinical protocols)
Nursing/clinical documentation (flow sheets), CDSS (error checking), PACS available outside Radiology
CDR, Controlled Medical Vocabulary, CDS, may have Document Imaging; HIE capable
Ancillaries - Lab, Rad, Pharmacy - All Installed
All Three Ancillaries Not Installed
Data from HIMSS Analytics® Database © 2015 HIMSS Analytics
3.6% 4.1%
25.4%
34.6%
10.3%
17.3%
3.4%
1.8%
3.1%
17.9%
32.8%
14.0%
21.0%
5.1%
2.0%
3.7%
2014 Q4 2015 Q3
N = 5467 N = 5454
Complete EMR, CCD transactions to share data; Data warehousing; Data continuity with ED, ambulatory, OP
Physician documentation (structured templates), full CDSS (variance & compliance), Closed loop medication administration
Full R-PACS
CPOE, Clinical Decision Support (clinical protocols)
Nursing/clinical documentation (flow sheets), CDSS (error checking), PACS available outside Radiology
CDR, Controlled Medical Vocabulary, CDS, may have Document Imaging; HIE capable
Ancillaries - Lab, Rad, Pharmacy - All Installed
All Three Ancillaries Not Installed
Data from HIMSS Analytics® Database © 2015 HIMSS Analytics
3.7% 4.1%
25.4%
34.6%
10.3%
17.3%
3.4%
1.8%
3.1%
23.6 %
32.3 %
13.2 %
18.2 %
3.6 %
1.9 %
3.3 %
2015 Q2 2015 Q3
N = 5464 N = 5454
Complete EMR, CCD transactions to share data; Data warehousing; Data continuity with ED, ambulatory, OP
Physician documentation (structured templates), full CDSS (variance & compliance), Closed loop medication administration
Full R-PACS
CPOE, Clinical Decision Support (clinical protocols)
Nursing/clinical documentation (flow sheets), CDSS (error checking), PACS available outside Radiology
CDR, Controlled Medical Vocabulary, CDS, may have Document Imaging; HIE capable
Ancillaries - Lab, Rad, Pharmacy - All Installed
All Three Ancillaries Not Installed
MU Stage 3
MU Stage 2
MU Stage 1
Value Score by S-T-E-P-S
S
T
E
P
S
4,043
1,141
2,643
6,355
894
Total = 15,076
11 |
Value Statements by Provider Type
194
262
835
289
95
671
152
1,352
2,032
976
1,178
592
489
68
262
2,423
4,207
1,805
State
Public Health Organization
Other
Health Information Exchange
Consumer
Community Health Organization
Beacon Commumity
Small Speciality Physician…
Small Primary Care Practice…
Patient Centered Medical Home
Large Speciality Physician…
Large Primare Care Practice…
Accountable Care Organization
Rural Hospital
Critical Access Hospital
Community Hospital
Health Care System
Academic Medical Center
Larg
e h
osp
ital
syste
ms
Ind
ivid
ual
ho
sp
itals
P
ractic
es
O
ther
Total = 13,143 (some statements fall in multiple buckets)
SOURCE: HIMSS VS database as of January 8, 2016
12 |
Count of Value Statements by STEPS subtype Total = 12,719
Satisfaction
Treatment/Clinical
Electronic Secure
Info/Data
Prevention &
Patient education
Savings
648
898
1871
368
590
456
687
384
706
861
2301
118
2075
122
198
375
61
Operational Savings
Financial/Business
Efficiency Savings
Prevention
Patient Education and Engagement
Evidence Based Medicine
Data Sharing
Data Reporting
Enhanced Communication
Safety
Quality of Care
Other Trmnt/Clinical
Efficiencies
Staff Satisfaction
Provider Satisfaction
Patient Satisfaction
General Satisfaction
SOURCE: HIMSS VS database as of January 8, 2016
http://www.himss.org/ValueSuite
STEPS Framework
14 |
STEPS: Satisfaction
Total = 756
61
301
74
39
159
122
Satisfaction Benefits
Increased patient satisfaction and/orsurvey score
Reduced patient wait times
Improved quality of life
Increased provider satisfaction
Increased staff morale/job satisfaction
15 |
STEPS: Treatment/Clinical
Total = 5,371
97 415
250 279
438 184
408 118
691 411
17 156
260 536
17 66
35 62
50 132
75 187
120 367
Improved accessibility of lab/x-ray reports
Other efficiency benefits
Real time/remote access to health records
Improved clinical documentation
Improved management of congestive…
Other quality of care benefits
Reduction in ER visits
Reduction in hospital admissions
Reduction in length of inpatient stay
Other safety benefits
Reduction in medical errors
16 |
STEPS: Electronic Secure Info/Data
Total = 2,233
208 327
63 36
72 207
67 59
51 222
192 191
8 74
1 61 58
265 71
Improved communication among…
Improved communication with staff
Improved internal communication
Increased number of patients tracked
Improved/increased data reporting
Increased information sharing among…
Other data sharing
Availabilty of genetic data to make…
Increased access to evidence based…
Other evidence based medicine benefits
17 |
STEPS: Patient Engagement and Population Management Total = 958
51
58
207
76
64
134
4
108
24
50
82
49
51
Improved distribution of patient…
Improved patient compliance
Improved patient engagement
Other patient education benefit(s)
Improved patient education
Decreased obesity
Improvement in smoking cessation
Increased immunizations
Increased screenings
Other prevention benefits
Improvements in prevention
18 |
STEPS: Savings Total = 3,417
166
472
125
341
444
184
139
4
143
106
409
140
87
9
29
92
412
115
Improved claims management
Improved workflow/practice efficiency
Increased efficiency in scheduling patients
More efficient use of staff resources
Other efficiency savings
Increased efficiency
Reduction in transcription costs
Improved charge capture
Increased patient revenue
Increased patient volume
Other financial/business benefits
Improved financial results
Reduction in days in accounts receivable
Reduction in malpractice premiums
Improved business recovery planning…
Improved use of space
Other operational savings
Increased operational savings
http://www.himss.org/ValueSuite
STEPS Framework
• S=Satisfaction; 894
• T=Treatment/Clinical; 6,355
• E=Electronic Secure Data Exchange; 2,643
• P= Patient Engagement/Population Health; 1,141
• S=Savings; 4,043
• Total =15,076
HIMSS’s Value Collection
•Value Vocabulary – STEPS = framework for discussing, attributing value
– Value Suite = collection of 15,000 statements and 1,700 case studies
of derived value sorted into the STEPS framework
– Pathways to Value=tools and resources to drive value
– Value Score = numeric score summarizing value derived from HIT
HIMSS’s Value Framework
Now’s the Time for Phase Two
The HIMSS Value Score
• Establishes a universal global evidence-based method for evaluation
• Identifies opportunities for provider organizations to derive more
value from their health IT
• Challenges organizations to measure the value demonstrated by the
IT they have in-place
• Fueling further trust in, use and growth of health IT
What the Value Score Offers
Value Score
Perceived
Value
Baseline Value Innovative
Value
+ +
What is the Value Score?
Recognized
Value
+
Value Score
Perceived
Value
Baseline
Value
Innovative
Value
+ +
Value Score Model: Data Sources
Recognized
Value
+
PROVIDER – survey instrument
PROVIDER – internal documents
Value Score
Perceived
Value
Baseline
Value
Innovative
Value
+ +
Value Score Model
Recognized
Value
+
Baseline Value
Value Score
Perceived
Value
Baseline
Value
Innovative
Value
+ +
Value Score Model
Recognized
Value
+
Perceived Value: Question 1
NOT INSTALLED/USED
WHY THESE TECHNOLOGIES?
KEY WORDS
Perceived Value: Measure - 2
KEY PHRASE
Perceived Value: Measure - 2
S T E P S
Perceived Value: Measure - 2
S T E P S
http://www.himss.org/ValueSuite
STEPS Framework
Value Score
Perceived
Value
Baseline
Value
Innovative
Value
+ +
Value Score Model
Recognized
Value
+
35 |
Third Component of Value Score
Data Capture and Sharing
Advanced Processes
Improved Outcomes
Recognized Value expected
and realized
in specific areas by
using HIT
Expected Value Outcomes T E P Efficiencies: • Administrative & Care Delivery Workflow
• Electronic Prescribing
X
Safety: • Clinical Decision Support
• Computerized Provider Order Entry
X
Data Sharing: • Protection of Patient Health Information
X
Data Reporting: • Public Health and Clinical Data Registry
X
Patient Education/Engagement: • Patient Electronic Access to Health Information
X
Level 1: Data Capture and Sharing Select up to 2 examples
Recognized Value
T = Treatment/Clinical
E = Electronic Secure Data
P = Patient Engagement & Population Management
Expected Value Outcomes T E P Efficiencies: • Throughput of Congested Hospital Spaces (e.g. ED, OR, ICU)
• Reduction of Waiting Time (e.g. Clinics, ED)
X
Safety: • Reduction of Infection (e.g. Central Line, Catheter, Ventilator
Dependent Pneumonia)
X
Business Efficiencies: • Revenue Cycle Management
X
Data Sharing: • Improved Tracking of Chronic Disease Management
X
Enhanced Communication: • Health Information Exchange
X
Prevention: • Population Health Initiatives
X
Patient Education/Engagement: • Coordination of Care through Patient Engagement
X
Recognized Value Level 2: Advanced Processes Select up to three examples
Expected Value Outcomes T E P Efficiencies: • Use of Blood and Blood Products
X
Quality of Care: • 30 day Readmission Rate
X
Data Sharing: • Early detection of Infectious Disease Outbreaks
X
Evidence Based Medicine: • Change in Practice from the use of Clinical Analytics
X
Patient Education/Engagement: • Use of Patient Generated Health Data
X
Recognized Value Level 3: Improved Outcomes Select up to three examples
Recognized Value – Question 3
WHY THESE TECHNOLOGIES?
KEY PHRASE
TIMEFRAME?
Recognized Value – Examples KEY PHRASE KEY PHRASE
Value Score
Perceived
Value
Baseline
Value
Innovative
Value
+ +
Value Score Model
Recognized
Value
+
Innovative Value – Examples
Innovative Value (cont’d)
SATISFACTION OUTCOME MEASURE
SAVINGS OUTCOME MEASURE
Innovative Value (cont’d)
Value Score
Perceived
Value
Baseline Value
Innovative Value
+ +
Value Score: Value Weights
Recognized
Value
+
HIMSS Value Score
Baseline
Value
Perceived Value
Recognized
Value
Innovative Value
Inherent value derived
from having advanced
HIT capabilities
(EMRAM Stage 7 >
through Stage 3)
Understanding of value
realization through IT
permeates organization
Demonstrable clinical,
financial, operational,
strategic outcomes
Demonstrable
innovative outcomes
that drive the
industry forward
Leadership
Outcomes
Organization
Adoption
Questions?
• Pat Wise
@patwise
www.linkedin.com/in/pat-wise-90b0391