Upload
lambert-mcdonald
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Status of the EURISOL Design Study
Yorick Blumenfeld
IPN Orsay
Changes to the Management proposed by MB
• Y. Blumenfeld interim project leader to replace G. Fortuna.
• G. Fortuna will remain member of the MB at least until April 2007.
• C. Hovaguimian management support at Orsay• R. Batistella will continue to administer website
at LNL (and assist with specific legal questions)• Changes submitted to SC on November 30.
TABLE 1). Participants in EURISOL Design Study
Participant Country Participant Country
GANIL (coordinator)
France Inst. Physics Vilnius Lithuania
CNRS/IN2P3 France Warsaw University Poland
INFN Italy Inst. Phys. Bratislava Slovakia
CERN Europe U. Liverpool United Kingdom
U. C. Louvain Belgium GSI Darmstadt Germany
CEA France U. Santiago Spain
NIPNE Romania CCLRC Daresbury United Kingdom
U. Jyväskylä Finland Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland
L.M.U. München
Germany Inst. Phys. Latvia Latvia
FZ Jülich Germany Stockholm. U. MSL Sweden
20 Participants
Topical areas and tasks of the EURISOL Design Study
Topical Area Tasks Lead Institution
Management Management GANIL
Accelerators Driver acceleratorPost Accelerator
Superconducting cavity prototyping
INFNGANILIN2P3
Targets Liquid Hg ConverterDirect targets
High power fission target
CERNCERNINFN
Physics, beams and safety Safety and radioprotectionBeam PreparationBeam Intensities
Physics and Instrumentation
CEAU. Jyväskylä
GSIU. Liverpool
Beta Beams Beta Beam Conceptual Design Study CERN
12 Tasks
The EURISOL Road Map
• Vigorous scientific exploitation of current ISOL facilities : EXCYT, Louvain, REX/ISOLDE, SPIRAL
• Construction of intermediate generation facilities: SPIRAL2, MAFF,HIE-ISOLDE, SPES
• Design and prototyping of the most specific and challenging parts of EURISOL in the framework of EURISOL_DS.
= 0.03 = 0.78
Ionsources
RFQ176 MHz
HWRs176MHz
Elliptical ISCL704 MHz
1 GeV/qH-, H+, 3He++
1.5 MeV/u
100 keV
60 MeV/q 140 MeV/q
>200 MeV/qD+, A/q=2
Charge-breeder
Low-resolutionmass-selector
UCx
target
1+ ionsource
n-generator
= 0.065= 0.14= 0.27= 0.385
QWRISCL
88 MHz
3 QWRs ISCL
88 MHz
8 HWRsISCL
176 MHz
SpokeISCL
264 MHz
2-150 MeV/u (for Sn-132)
To low-E areas
Secondaryfragmentation
target
A possible schematic layout
for a EURISOL facility
One of severaltarget stations
= 0.047
3-spoke ISCL 325 MHz
High-resolution mass-selectors
Bunching RFQ
To medium-energy experimental areas
= 0.65
Elliptical ISCL704 MHz
= 0.09, = 0.15
H-
H+, D+,3He++
To low-E areas
9.3- 62.5 MeV/u 2.1-19.9 MeV/u
To experimental area
RFQs
The Main Challenges
• Design a 5MW; 1GeV proton driver with additional capability of 200 AMeV deuterons and A/Q=2 Heavy Ions; build and test prototypes of the cavities.
• Design a liquid Hg converter which will accept 5 MW of beam power.
• Design a UCx target which will make the most efficient use of the neutrons produced.
• Evaluate the safety constraints of the above set up.• Design an efficient multi-user beam distribution system.• Design a superconducting HI LINAC capable of accelerating 132Sn
up to 150 AMeV• Investigate technologies for the instrumentation of the future• Provide a conceptual study for a beta-beam neutrino facility.
Gathering the expertise in joint Management-Task meetings
• User Requirements– Post accelerator, beam preparation, physics– Orsay, May 2
• Extended Driver capability– Direct target, driver, cavities, beam intensity– GSI, May 5
• High Power target– Hg converter, fission target– Legnaro, Oct 4
Driver accelerator1 GeV 5 MW proton beam3He at 2 GeV,
deuterons at 250 MeV,
heavy ions of A/Q=2 at 125AMeV
From A. Facco, task 7
Reference MMW Target Station
Hg converter and secondary fission targets
Hg loop with window8 UCX targets40x6x3 cm
Y. Kadi and L. Tecchio; tasks 2 and 4
Problems : Diffusion-Effusion TimeIon Sources
Next Joint Meetings
• Ion Sources
• Safety
• Multi-User capability
• ….
Other Achievements:Please visit www.eurisol.org
• Fully functional dynamic website• Agenda and Minutes of 71 meetings• 60 Publications and internal reports• Official Documents, Annual Reports, Presentations ….• Automatic publication review procedure
• Full compliance by task leaders• Milestones and deliverables• Outreach Pages• …
A Slow Start…
• Initial difficulties in recruiting post docs• Spending for the first year was only 35% of first
advance : Second advance delayed by 1 year. • Some delays in milestones• Pace has picked up strongly in the second year• Change of expenditure profile will be requested.• Possible extension of contract by 6 months will
be discussed in Spring 2007.
Design StudyPROJECT PERSON MONTHS STATUS WITH INFORMATION AT
26/5/2006 PER PARTICIPANT
81,00
216,00
234,00
247,20
90,00
48,00
30,00
78,00
0,0012,00
44,40
12,00
78,12
48,00
127,90
0,00
22,00
10,0016,00
37,00
7,250,00
72,00
12,00
44,4036,00
84,00
24,0024,0012,00
30,00
12,00
5,599,20
24,000,00
13,79
21,50
0,000,000
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
TOTAL PROJECT P/M FUNDED BY EC
TOTAL PROJECT P/M ALREADY ENGADED
FOR INSTITUTIONS INVOLVED IN TASK 2, 3 AND 4 DATA AT 31/1/2006
Milestone StatusDesign Study
G. Fortuna, PSI JUNE 2006
STATUS OF THE PROJECT MILESTONES (16 MONTH)
0,00
3,00
6,00
9,00
12,00
15,00
18,00
21,00
24,00
27,00
30,00
33,00
36,00
39,00
42,00
45,00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
FIRST 16 MONTHS MILESTONES DUE
FIRST 16 MONTHS MILESTONES ACHIEVED
(3) (1)
(3)
(3)
Possible Locations?
Administration / Stay at GANIL
The Design Study will investigate the implementation and cost of EURISOL in these 3 hypotheses by putting in place a committee in Spring
2007, including the MB + technical coordinator + experts.Report in Spring 2008
New research New research infrastructures in FP7infrastructures in FP7
•Objective: To help create new research infrastructures of pan-European interest (or major upgrades of existing ones)
•- Design studies: to support feasibility studies for new infrastructures through a “bottom-up approach” of calls for proposals
•- Construction of new infrastructures (incl. major upgrades): to promote the creation of new infrastructures through a strategic approach based on the work conducted by ESFRI* on the development of a European roadmap fro new research infrastructures
-* ESFRI – European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructures
From Alex Mueller
New research New research infrastructures in FP7infrastructures in FP7
• Support to Construction via a two-stage process:
• The preparatory phase
- restricted calls targeting priority projects (based on the work of ESFRI)
to support finalisation of construction plans, legal organisation, financial engineering, management aspects (Second call in 2009)
• The construction phase- developed following the satisfactory implementation of the preparatory phase- “case by case” approach (e.g. use of Article 171)
From Alex Mueller
You are cordially invited to attend the EURISOL DS Town Meeting at CERNon Nov. 27-28.Registration is open until Nov. 1 at www.eurisol.org
For next year we are considering the possibility of a jointTown meeting with EURONS