Upload
tabitha-tuckerman
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Status of T2K
Tokai to Kamioka Neutrino Project at J-PARCJune 21, 2004
Koichiro Nishikawa
Kyoto University
beam of < 1GeVKamioka
J-PARC(Tokai-village)
→ → xx disappearance
→ → ee appearanceNC measurement
0.75 MW 50 (40) GeV PS
Super-K: 50 ktonWater Cherenkov
~Mt “Hyper Kamiokande”
4MW 50GeV PS
CP violation proton decay
Approved exp (x102 of K2K)
Future Extension
“T2K” (Tokai-to-Kamioka) neutrino experiment
LOI: hep-ex/0106019
Collaboration• Formed in May 2003• 12 countries, 52 institutions• 148 collaborators (w/o students)
Nuclear and ParticleExperimental Facility
Materials and Life ScienceExperimental Facility
Neutrinos to Super-Kamiokande
Linac(350m)
3 GeV Synchrotron(25 Hz, 1MW)
Nuclear Transmutation
J-PARC Facility
50 GeV Synchrotron(0.75 MW)
J-PARC = Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex
SuperKamiokande@Kamioka, Japan
C Scientific American
42m
39m
Water Cherenkovdetector
1000 m underground 50,000 ton (22,500 ton fid.) 11,146 20 inch PMTs 1,885 anti-counter PMTs
Since 1996.
Accident on 2001.
Partial recovery on 2002.
(Full recovery on 2006)
• The mixing angles 12, 23, 31, ?– How small the mixing of 1st and 3rd generation?
• Does e contain ?– Symmetry of 2nd and 3rd generation?
• How close 23 to 3 flavor analysis– Is sterile neutrino exist?
• Fraction in disappearance of – How large is the phase ?
• CP violation in lepton?
• Prepare for un-expected
• Neutrino beam – Suited for far detector technology
• water Cherenkov
e
m1 m2 m3
Neutrino beam
Strategy
• High statistics by high intensity beam• Tune E at oscillation maximum• Sub-GeV beam
– Low particle multiplicity suited for Water Cherenkov– Good E resolution : dominated by n p
• Narrow band beam to reduce BG
0.75MW 50GeV-PS
Off-Axis beam Super-Kamiokande
Neutrino Interaction @~1 GeV & E reconstruction
CC QEcan reconstruct E p
CC nQE Bkg. for E measurement
NC main Bkg. for electron appe
arance
+ n → + p
-
p
(E, p)
+ n → + p + ’s
p’s
-
+ n → + p +
p
(E, p)
’s
cospEm
2mEmE
N
2Nrec
E
Lm27.1sin2sinP
22
Neutrino cross section
E reconstruction resolution
Large QE fraction for <1 GeV Knowledge of QE cross sections
Beam with small high energy tail
QE
inelastic
E~60MeV<10% meaurement
E (reconstructed) – E (true)
1-sin22
non-QEresolution
m2
+ 10% bin High resolution : less sensitive to systematics
Off Axis Beam
OA3°
OA0°
(ref.: BNL-E889 Proposal)
TargetHornsDecay Pipe
Super-K.
Quasi Monochromatic Beam x 2~3 intense than NBB
Statistics at SK (OAB 2 deg,1 yr,22.5 kt)
~ 4500 tot ~ 3000 CC e ~0.2% at peak
Tuned at oscillation maximum
Neutrino energy spectrum x
OA2°
GeV
Extra handle on e contamination in the beam
Off-Axis Beam
~1/500
from K
e from + K
Intrinsic background: e / (peak) ~ 0.002
Primary physics goals
e appearance :
sin2213
Estimated background in Super-K Signal
(~40% eff.)Signal +
BG NC
e
beam e total
0.1 12.0 10.7 1.7 0.5 24.9 114.6 139.5
0.01 12.0 10.7 1.7 0.5 24.9 11.5 36.4
sin2213
m2
Off axis 2 deg, 5 years
Off axis 2 deg, 5 yearsat
sin2213>0.006 C
HO
OZ
exc
lud
ed
Precision measurement of 23 , m223
possible systematic errors and phase-1 stat.•Systematic errors
• normalization (10% ( 5%(K2K))• non-qe/qe ratio (20% (to be measured))• E scale (4% (K2K 3%))• Spectrum shape (Fluka/MARS →(Near D.))• Spectrum width (10%)
OA2.5o
(sin22)~0.01 (m2
23) <1×10-4 eV2
Neutrino facility
50 GeV 0.75 MW beam !
cm
1100o
(cf. melting point 1536o)
3.3E14 ppp w/ 5s pulse
When this beam hits an iron block,
Material heavier than iron would melt.
Thermal shock stress
(cf. stress limit ~300 MPa)
Material heavier than Ti might be destroyed.
Cooling power and radiation shield
GPaTE 3
radio activity
> 1000Sv/h
Jan.10, 2004 meeting from Director General of KEK
• In October CSTP rated the T2K project as C, the worst rating. We thought that CSTP's decision was completely wrong. So, we, KEK, struck back to get the better rating.
• Thanks to supports by many people, notably by M. Koshiba and some politicians, we were successful to have CSTP update the rating. Shocked by the rating, MEXT immediately established the review committee to judge if the T2K's should be funded next year, considering the scientific merit, urgency and collaboration's competence. The review report, which is attached here, was of course favorable and sent to CSTP. The committee chairman, Professor Kodaira, and MEXT's director general, Mr. Ishikawa, responded to CSTP members' questions.
• Finally S&T Minister Motegi agreed that the committee report was reasonable. He sent his comment to Ministry of Finance.
• After tough negotiations between MEXT and MOF backed by many and strong supports, MOF approved the T2K on December 20. ( as the first year of five-year construction project)
- Now formally approved
• However MOF approved only 6 oku-yen for proposed 8 oku-yen for FY 2004. You must work harder to be more cost effective.
• I want to urge you the following. CSTP will review the T2K and the whole J-PARC project every year.
• I suspect that the present manpower for the beam line construction is too weak and you will not be able to build it properly and timely. You should show us first of all how much you will improve the present situation. I urge the non-KEK collaborators NOT to be simple users of the beam line but to fully participate in the construction of the beam line. Otherwise I am afraid that T2K may eventually be terminated. Spokesperson should have sent this kind of statement long before.
Best regards, Yoji Totsuka (KEK DG)
• Pion/Kaon production at 40-50 GeV !
• Muon monitors @ ~140m– spill-by-spill monitoring of beam direction/intensity
• First Front detector @280m– 0 degree definition– High stat. neutrino inter. studies
• (Second Front Detector @ ~2km for future addition)
• Far detector @ 295km– Super-Kamiokande (50kt)
1.5km
295km
0.28km
Neutrino spectra at diff. dist
dominant syst. in K2K
p
140 m0 m 280 m 2 km 295 km
Task force
• Identify the common project item and cost estimate for the contributions by next meeting from all countries to agree on (August)
• Write formal (technical) proposal by end of 2004.
decay pipe
Near detector
TargetStation
-pit280m
130m
Neutrino facility in J-PARC (JFY2004-08)
Special FeaturesSpecial Features
Superconducting Superconducting combined functioncombined function magnets magnets
Off-axis beamOff-axis beam
Funded componentsFunded components
Primary proton beam line
• Normal conducting magnets
+ INR
• Superconducting arc
+ BNL,Saclay
• Proton beam monitors
+ Canada
Target station+ Canada
Target/Horn system+ US
Decay pipe (130m Cover OA angle 2~3 deg. )
being constructed
Beam dump+ UK
muon monitors+ Canada, UK
Near neutrino detector
20m
36m
3
2
SK direction
16m
5m
FGDMRD
~14m
SK
Grid profile
beam
3m1m
1m
Concept of Near Neutrino Detector Off-axis (~2o0.20)
– and e neutrino fluxes and the spectra.
– interaction study (CC-QE, non-QE, 0, )
– Kaon Contributions
On-axis (0o)– Beam direction– Divergence– Beam stability
The detector design is just started
Schedule
• Possible upgrade in future– 4MW Super-J-PARC + Hyper-K ( 1Mt water Cherenkov)
– CP violation in lepton sector
– Proton Decay
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
MINOS
OPERA/ICARUS 5yr (~20
SK full rebuild
JHF- construction physics run K2K
2009
Sensitivity (3) to CP Violation Phase with upgrades
Preliminary
• Bkg. subtraction with 2% accuracy ( red),
• bkg(2%)+selection(2%) (black) errors
• Operation of 2 yr for and 6.8 yr for
≧33deg at sin2213=0.01
≧14deg for large sin2213
• Understanding of background and systematics is essential
Stat
onl
y
Summary
• The first “superbeam” long baseline neutrino exp. “T2K” approved– 5 years construction (JFY2004~JFY2008)– Start physics in 2009– Try to discover non-zero 13
– precision measurement of 23, m232.
• 1st step to the CP violation in the Lepton sector
• International collaboration formed• R&D in various components in the beam line and near d
etector• Construction started
Construction status
December, 2003
Linac Area
Linac Area
3 GeV Area
3 GeV Area
31
3-50 GeV Area
3 GeV to 50 GeV
32
50 GeV
50 GeV