30
Status of Neutrino Science Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003

Status of Neutrino Science Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Status of Neutrino Science

Hitoshi Murayama

LBNLnu

April 11, 2003

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 2

Two Main Directions

• Neutrino Properties– Neutrino Masses– Neutrino Mixings– Nature of Neutrinos

• Neutrino as a Probe– Parton Distribution Function– Precision Electroweak Physics– Neutrino Astrophysics

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 3

Outline

• Introduction

• Current Status of Neutrino Oscillation

• Main Scientific Questions

• Majorana vs Dirac

• The last mixing angle and CP violation

• Conclusion

Current Status of Neutrino Oscillation

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 5

Rare Effects from High-Energies

• Effects of physics beyond the SM as effective operators

• Can be classified systematically (Weinberg)

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 6

Unique Role of Neutrino Mass

• Lowest order effect of physics at short distances

• Tiny effect (m/E)2~(eV/GeV)2=10–18!

• Interferometry (i.e., Michaelson-Morley)!– Need coherent source

– Need interference (i.e., large mixing angles)

– Need long baseline

Nature was kind to provide all of them!

• “neutrino interferometry” (a.k.a. neutrino oscillation) a unique tool to study physics at very high scales

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 7

MNS matrix

• Standard parameterization of Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix for 3 generations

UMNS=

Ue1 Ue2 Ue3

Uμ1 Uμ2 Uμ3

Uτ1 Uτ2 Uτ3

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

=

1

c23 s23

−s23 c23

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

c13 s13e−iδ

1

−s13eiδ c13

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

c12 s12

−s12 c12

1

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

atmospheric ??? solar

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 8

What we learned in 2001–2

• Atmospheric is lost (>10), converted most likely to (>99%CL) (SK, MACRO, SOUDAN-II)

• Solar e is converted to either or (>5) (SNO)

• Reactor anti-e are lost (99.95%CL) (KamLAND)

• Only the LMA solution left for solar neutrinos• Tiny neutrino mass: the first evidence for

incompleteness of Minimal Standard Model

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 9

SNO Result

• Only e produced in the Sun• Wrong Neutrinos are

coming from the Sun!• Somehow some of e were

converted to on their way from the Sun’s core to the detector neutrino oscillation!

ΦCC =1.76 ± 0.05 ± 0.09 ⋅106 cm−2 sec−1

ΦNC = 5.09 −0.43+0.44 −0.43

+0.46 ⋅106 cm−2 sec−1

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 10

KamLAND result

• First terrestrial expt relevant to solar neutrino problem

• KamLAND will exclude or verify LMA definitively

Dec 2002Expected #events: 86.8±5.6

Background #events: 0.95±0.99Observed #events: 54

No oscillation hypothesisExcluded at 99.95%

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 11

Summary of Neutrino Oscillation

Before SNO and KamLAND

Dec 2002with SNO and KamLAND

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 12

Three-generation

• Solar, reactor & atmospheric oscillations easily accommodated within three generations

• sin2223 near maximal, m2atm ~ 310–3eV2

• sin2212 large, m2solar ~ 5–2010–5eV2

• sin2213=|Ue3|2< 0.05 from CHOOZ, Palo Verde

• Because of small sin2213, solar (reactor) & atmospheric oscillations almost decouple

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 13

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 14

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 15

Extended Standard Model

• Massive Neutrinos Minimal SM incomplete• How exactly do we extend it?• Abandon either

– Minimality: introduce new unobserved light degrees of freedom (right-handed neutrinos)

– Lepton number: abandon distinction between neutrinos and anti-neutrinos and hence matter and anti-matter

• Dirac or Majorana neutrino• Without knowing which, we don’t know how to

extend the Standard Model

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 16

Theoretical Bias:Seesaw Mechanism

• Why is neutrino mass so small?

• Need right-handed neutrinos to generate neutrino mass

νL νR( )mD

mD

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ νLνR

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ νL νR( )

mD

mD M

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ νLνR

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ mν =

mD2

M<<mD

To obtain m3~(m2atm)1/2, mD~mt, M3~1015GeV (GUT!)

Majorana Neutrinos

, but R SM neutral

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 17

Neutrinoless Double-beta Decay

• The only known practical approach to discriminate Majorana vs Dirac neutrinos

0: nn ppe–e– with no neutrinos• Matrix element <me>=imiUei

2

• Current limit |<me>| ≤ about 1eV• m3~(m2

23)1/2≈0.05eV looks a promising goal• However, m3Ue3

2<<m3 and we can ignore m3 • Fortunately, Ue1

2 and Ue22 cannot cancel exactly because

the maximal angle excluded by SNO: Ue12–

Ue22=cos2212>0.07 (1)

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 18

Three Types of Mass Spectrum

• Degenerate– All three around >0.1eV with small splittings– Possible even after WMAP+2dF: m<0.23eV– May be confirmed by KATRIN, cosmology– |<me>|=|imiUei

2|>m cos2212>0.07m

• Inverted– m3~0, m1~m2~(m2

23)1/2≈0.05eV– May be confirmed by long-baseline experiment with matter effect– |<me>|=|imiUei

2|>(m223)1/2 cos2212>0.0035eV

• Normal– m1~m2~0, m3~(m2

23)1/2≈0.05eV– |<me>|=|imiUei

2| may be zero even if Majorana

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 19

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 20

Now that LMA is confirmed...

• Dream case for neutrino oscillation physics!• m2

solar within reach of long-baseline expts• Even CP violation may be probable

– neutrino superbeam– muon-storage ring neutrino factory

• Possible only if:– m12

2, s12 large enough (LMA)– 13 large enough

P(ν μ → ν e ) − P(ν μ → ν e ) = −16s12c12s13c132 s23c23

sinδ sinΔm12

2

4EL

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟sin

Δm132

4EL

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟sin

Δm232

4EL

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 21

Shootout (Lindner)

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 22

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 23

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 24

13 decides the future

• The value of 13 crucial for the future of neutrino oscillation physics

• Determines the required facility/parameters/baseline/energy

• Two paths to determine 13

– Long-baseline accelerator neutrino oscillation– Reactor neutrino experiment with two detectors

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 25

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 26

Verify Oscillation

• Even atmospheric neutrino data do not show “oscillation” yet MINOS, J-PARC

m223, 23, mass

hierarchy and 13

• KamLAND data is consistent with overall suppression continued running

m212

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 27

Low-Energy Solar Neutrinos

• Solar neutrino data suggest energy-dependent survival probability tests MSW effect

12

Helps interpretation of CP violation, double beta decay data

7%1%

20%

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 28

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 29

If LSND right,All hell breaks loose

• Sterile neutrinos are strongly constrained by the combination of all existing data and WMAP+2dF

• CPT violation is strongly constrained by SNO+KamLAND

• If LSND correct, all previous measurements need to be re-examined by a collection of short-, medium- and long-baseline experiments. Possibly mini-muon-storage ring.

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 30

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

Specific recommendations to attack these questions in the context of LBNL