Statement of Work For Engineering ServicesCOTS Commercial-off-the-shelf (computer application software) DCN Design Change Notices DOE Department of Energy EA Environmental Assessment

Statement of Work for Engineering Services RFP No. 329867, Rev. 0

Project L-612, 230kV Transmission System Reconditioning and Sustainability Repairs

Page 1 of 46

Updated January 9, 2018

Statement of Work

For

Engineering Services

Title: Engineering Services for Project L-612, 230kV Transmission System Reconditioning and

Sustainability Repairs Date: August 8, 2019 Revision Number: 0



Page 2 of 46


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction / Background .............................................................................................. 8

2.0 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 10

3.0 Description of Work - Specific ....................................................................................... 10

3.1 Roles and Responsibilities ...................................................................................... 10

3.1.1 MSA Provided Documents and/or Services ........................................................ 10

3.1.2 Design Considerations – Services Provided by Others ....................................... 11

3.2 Project Constraints and System Interfaces .............................................................. 12

3.3 Task 1 – Functional Requirements and Design Criteria Document ....................... 12

3.4 Task 2 – 30% Design Package ................................................................................ 13

3.5 Task 3 – Construction Cost and Schedule Estimate ............................................... 14



3.8 Task 6 – 100% Final Design Package..................................................................... 15

3.9 Task 7 – Engineering Support for Procurement of Materials ................................. 16

3.10 Task 8 – Testing / Startup / Commissioning ....................................................... 16

3.10.1 Testing Documentation.................................................................................... 16

3.10.2 Operations and Maintenance Manuals ............................................................ 17

3.11 Task 9 – Engineering Support During Construction ........................................... 17

3.12 Task 10 – As-Built Drawings .............................................................................. 18

4.0 Submittals ........................................................................................................................ 19

4.1 Comment Disposition in Microsoft Word .............................................................. 20

5.0 Acceptance Criteria ........................................................................................................ 20

6.0 Configuration Management and Standards ................................................................. 20

6.1 Design Team Task Lead Expectations .................................................................... 20

6.2 Design Process ........................................................................................................ 21

6.3 Design Interfaces .................................................................................................... 21

6.4 Documentation ........................................................................................................ 22

6.5 Design Reviews ...................................................................................................... 24

6.6 Design Verification ................................................................................................. 24



Page 3 of 46


6.7 As-Built Process...................................................................................................... 25

7.0 Requirements................................................................................................................... 25

7.1 Engineering Requirements ...................................................................................... 25

7.2 Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Requirements ...................................... 25

7.3 Quality Assurance (QA) Requirements .................................................................. 26

7.4 Government Property .............................................................................................. 27

7.5 Commercial Off the Shelf Software ....................................................................... 27

8.0 Personnel Requirements ................................................................................................. 28

8.1 Required Qualifications .......................................................................................... 29

8.2 Training Requirements............................................................................................ 29

8.3 Security and Badging Requirements ....................................................................... 30

8.4 Work Location / Potential Access Requirements ................................................... 30

8.5 Site Access and Work Hours .................................................................................. 31

9.0 Meetings ........................................................................................................................... 31

9.1 Subcontract Kick-Off Meeting ............................................................................... 31

9.2 Design Progress Meetings....................................................................................... 32

9.3 Design Review Meetings ........................................................................................ 32

9.4 Construction Progress Meetings ............................................................................. 32

10.0 Deliverables and Performance Schedule Requirements ............................................. 32

10.1 Deliverables ......................................................................................................... 32

10.2 Schedule .............................................................................................................. 32

10.3 Payment Schedule ............................................................................................... 33

11.0 Special Requirements ..................................................................................................... 33

11.1 Reporting Administration .................................................................................... 33

11.2 Lines of Communication ..................................................................................... 33

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1 - 30/60/90 Design Deliverables ........................................................................... 34

APPENDIX 2 - Drawing and/or Document List ...................................................................... 40

APPENDIX 3 - Sketches ............................................................................................................. 44



Page 4 of 46


FIGURES

Figure 1. Hanford Site 230kV Transmission System (Current Configuration) ...................... 8

Figure 2. Hanford Site 230kV Transmission System (New Configuration) ............................ 9

TABLES

Table 1. SOW Tasks and Descriptions ...................................................................................... 12

Table 2. Training Requirements ................................................................................................ 29

Table 3. Meeting Attendance ..................................................................................................... 31

Table 4. Schedule Milestones ..................................................................................................... 33

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT A – Submittal Register ATTACHMENT B – Applicable Engineering Procedures ATTACHMENT C – Reliability Engineering Checklist



Page 5 of 46


ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS A3 The abandoned transmission lines between Substations A8 and A9

A6 The Hanford active 200E Substation, 251-E

A7 The Hanford shut-down 100KW Substation, 151-KW

A8 The Hanford active 200W Substation, 251-W

A9 The Hanford active 100-KE Substation, 151-KE

AACE Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering

ACSR Aluminum Conductor, Steel Reinforced; refers to one or more strands of steel wire (for strength) surrounded by many strands of aluminum wire (electrical conductors)

APE Area of Potential Effect

BPA Bonneville Power Administration

BTR Buyer’s Technical Representative

CAT Construction Acceptance Testing

CDB Construction Data Book

CGS Columbia Generating Station (Nuclear Power Plant)

CS Contract Specialist

CSI Construction Specification Institute

COTS Commercial-off-the-shelf (computer application software)

DCN Design Change Notices

DOE Department of Energy

EA Environmental Assessment

EP Engineering Package

ES&H Environment, Safety, and Health

EU Hanford Electrical Utilities Group

EJTA Employee Job Task Analysis

FMEA Failure Modes and Effects Analysis

FMP Facility Modification Package

FTP File Transfer Protocol

GHA General Hazards Analysis

GS General Service

HEW Hanford Electric Works (a legacy name for the Hanford Electrical Transmission System)

HDNS Hanford Document Numbering System

kV Thousand Volt (E.G.: 230kV is 230,000 volts)



Page 6 of 46


MSA Mission Support Alliance, LLC

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act

NESC National Electrical Safety Code

OAT Operational Acceptance Testing

PE Professional Engineer

QAE Quality Assurance Engineer/Engineering

QAP Quality Assurance Program

QL Quality Level

RCI Request for Clarification or Information

SOW Statement of Work

SSC Structures, Systems and Components

TL Task Lead

WBS Work Breakdown Structure



Page 7 of 46


1.0 INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND

As a prime contractor to the U.S. Department of Energy, Mission Support Alliance, LLC (MSA) is responsible for providing infrastructure-related services to support operations at the Hanford Site.

The Hanford 230kV Transmission System is the primary power source to the 100 and 200 Areas on the Hanford Site. The system operates in a loop feed configuration, providing dual sources to each of the three primary substations. The system is further demarcated into two distinct lines: the North Loop (Midway-Hanford Electric Works [HEW] No. 1) and the South Loop (Midway-HEW No. 2). The North and South Loops meet at the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) owned Ashe Tap switching station, located southeast of Gable Mountain (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Hanford Site 230kV Transmission System (Current Configuration)

The Ashe Tap provides an alternate path for offsite power for the safe shutdown of the Columbia Generating Station (CGS). This is the reason BPA has to keep the Ashe Tap connected to the Hanford transmission lines. This causes additional restrictions upon the operation of the North and South Loops.

The North Loop extends from the Midway Substation located on the west end of the Hanford Site to the Ashe Tap. The loop consists of a mixture of steel construction and wooden poles, and

BPA 115KV LINE BPA 230KV LINE BPA SUBSTATION (SUBSTATION#) DOE RICHLAND 230KV DOE RICHLAND SUBSTATION (SUBSTATION#)



Page 8 of 46


ages from the early 1940’s to the current decade. The conductors on the existing North Loop are primarily Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR) “Drake” and “Egret”. The North Loop has a current carrying capacity of about 800 amperes, which is less than the maximum projected load for the power transmission system. Hardware failures, including deteriorating armor rod, broken insulators, and failed conductor have been identified on the line.

An assessment was performed on the North Loop by MSA Electrical Utilities (EU) Craft and Engineering. It was determined that without either extensive repairs or a complete rebuild of the North Loop, that the line would not meet the long term mission requirements of the Central Plateau. Furthermore, the condition assessment found that at least 89% of the North Loop components ranked impaired to poor.

Upon completion of the assessment, a study was commissioned by MSA to determine possible routing alternatives for the complete rebuild of the North Loop.

Figure 2. Hanford Site 230kV Transmission System (New Configuration)

The South Loop has been rebuilt in the past and is in much better condition than the North Loop. It is constructed primarily on steel lattice towers and steel monopoles. It has also been upgraded to larger conductors (ACSR “Bittern”) and has a greater current carrying capacity (approximately 1200 amperes) than the North Loop. The South Loop does not need to be upgraded to meet forecast Hanford Cleanup Mission requirements.

OLD NORTH LOOP

NEW NORTH LOOP & BPA BYPASS

OLD NORTH LOOP

NEW A9 TAP

PORTION OF SOUTH LOOP BECOMES BPA BYPASS

BPA 115KV LINE BPA 230KV LINE BPA SUBSTATION (SUBSTATION#) DOE RICHLAND 230KV DOE RICHLAND SUBSTATION (SUBSTATION#)

NEW 230KV LINES DEACTIVATED LINE A9 SPUR



Page 9 of 46


The L-612, 230kV Transmission System Reconditioning and Sustainability Repairs Project will replace the existing 230kV North Loop including over 28-miles of transmission line using a shorter, more direct path. This Project will also install a second circuit, the BPA Bypass (Midway-Ashe No. 1), parallel to the North Loop to remove the alternate power path from the Hanford North and South Loops, and connecting the CGS directly to the Midway Substation. See Figure 2. Two multi-conductor fiber optic cable will also be installed from the Midway Substation to the Hanford A8 Substation. See Appendix 3 for routing sketch and details.

BPA previously commissioned a design for the L-612 Project. The BPA design was based upon ACSR “Rogue” conductors. MSA design requires the use of ACSR “Bittern Round” conductors. The changes will require recalculation of span sags, structure heights, structure spacing and total structure count. If site conditions change due to the change of conductor specification, the Subcontractor may be required to ensure the compatibility of the design to site conditions. This Project has already established an Area of Potential Effect (APE) that cannot be violated without severe cost and schedule impacts. All tensioning and conductor pulling activities must be confined to the existing APE.

2.0 OBJECTIVE

Through this Statement of Work (SOW), MSA is requesting Architectural/Engineering Firm (Subcontractor) services for conceptual and definitive design, construction support, startup/testing/commissioning support, and as-built/closeout support. Deliverables will include, but are not limited to, drawings, construction specification, procurement specification(s), calculation(s), and as-builts of the new double circuit 230kV transmission line.

3.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK - SPECIFIC

3.1 Roles and Responsibilities

3.1.1 MSA Provided Documents and/or Services

The following property or services will be provided by MSA as needed and are not included in the scope of work of this subcontract:

Agency and Landowner Coordination and Permits Construction Management MSA Oversight Environmental Mitigation Implementation Environmental Assessment (EA) Consultation Land Rights Review National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review and Documentation Project Management Project Scoping Real Property Permitting Existing Design Documentation (100% BPA Design)



Page 10 of 46


Access Road Design and Drawings Geotechnical Investigation for BPA Bypass (Midway-Ashe No. 1) Line Laydown Yards.

3.1.2 Design Considerations – Services Provided by Others

The Subcontractor design shall plan for the following activities:

MSA shall establish temporary construction areas for storage of materials and staging of personnel and equipment.

MSA shall construct new and/or improve existing access roads.

MSA shall remove vegetation in work areas as needed (e.g., new support structures).

Construction subcontractor (by others) shall remove existing support structures, conductor and hardware as necessary (primarily the abandoned A3 line between the A8 Substation north to Cutoff Road).

Construction subcontractor shall install new support structures.

Construction subcontractor shall install new conductors (ACSR “Bittern Round”), ground wires, and insulators.

Special attention is required in the area north of A8 (abandoned A3 line) where existing 500kV and 115kV lines cross the proposed routing.

Construction subcontractor shall install two optical fiber cables from A8 to Midway Substations. This fiber will be utilized by a separate project.

MSA shall reprogram protective relaying at A9 (for overcurrent only) and at A6 (to communicate with Midway for relay-to-relay transfer trip). MSA will coordinate this activity with BPA.

MSA shall revegetate areas disturbed by construction and not needed for operations and maintenance.

MSA EU shall coordinate all outages with BPA.

Demolition design and removal of the unused segments of the existing North Loop are not included in the scope of this subcontract.



Page 11 of 46


The design shall include the details of each of the major project components and activities discussed in the following subsections.

3.2 Project Constraints and System Interfaces

1. The only outage that can be taken on the existing feed to the Ashe Tap will occur during the CGS refueling outage. BPA is obligated to provide un-interrupted service to CGS via Ashe Tap. Subcontractor will communicate plans for work during this outage to MSA six months before the outage begins. CGS outages typically lasts six weeks.

2. Another MSA Project, L-791, converts the existing analog protective relaying communications to a fiber based discrete Transfer Trip system.

SOW Tasks

The Subcontractor shall provide all aspects of engineering services including management, administration, coordination, and development and updating of design documents required to support construction, installation, testing, startup and commissioning associated with the Project in accordance with the requirements of this SOW.

NOTE: This SOW includes 10 tasks described below. All tasks are to be included as itemized pricing.

Table 1. SOW Tasks and Descriptions

Task No. Description Base Bid

1 Updated Functional Requirements and Design Criteria Document 2 30% Design Package 3 Construction Cost and Schedule Estimate 4 60% Design Package 5 90% Design Package 6 100% Design Package 7 Engineering Support for Procurement of Materials 8 Testing/Startup/Commissioning Support 9 Engineering Support During Construction 10 As Built Drawings

3.3 Task 1 – Functional Requirements and Design Criteria Document

Subcontractor shall review the existing approved and released Functional Requirements Document and the existing and approved Functional Design Criteria document and create a combined, updated Functional Requirements and Design Criteria (FRDC) document in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-8258, Functional Requirements and Design Criteria to



Page 12 of 46


facilitate the new redesign. MSA shall provide a draft version of the FRDC for updating after award of the subcontract.

HNF-59468 Revision 0, Functional Requirements Document L-612, 230 kV Transmission System Reconditioning and Sustainability Repairs

HNF-59660 Revision 0, Functional Design Criteria L-612, 230 kV Transmission System Reconditioning and Sustainability Repairs.

3.4 Task 2 – 30% Design Package

The 30% design is intended to provide MSA with a detailed overview of what will become the finished design. Below are listed several areas that differ from the design commissioned by BPA. See Appendix 3, Sketches for the routing details.

The following areas are of special concern:

Midway Substation: The routing of the transmission lines becomes complicated in the vicinity of the BPA Midway Substation. Refer to Appendix 3, Sheet 2, Midway Substation. As the two lines approach the substation from the north, the new BPA Bypass (Midway-Ashe) line diverges from the two circuit line and continues roughly south-southwest to the east side of the substation. The new North Loop (DOE Midway-HEW No. 1) continues west. The three existing steel lattice towers from the old North Loop are to be reused to carry the new conductors to the west side of the substation. BPA is responsible for the termination of the conductors at the substation. See Note 1 below.

A9 Tap: At the location where the existing old North Loop intersects the new North Loop, adjacent to Cutoff Road, a new three-way switch is to be installed to connect the new North Loop to the segment of North Loop to be reused. Refer to Appendix 3, Sheet 3, A9 Tap Detail. The old North loop is to be disconnected southwest of Cutoff Road and southeast of the A9 Substation. See Note 1 below.

A3 Crossing: There is an existing abandoned transmission line, A3 that travels north from the A6 Substation to Cutoff Road. See Appendix 3, Sheet 4, A3 right-of-way Detail. The new North Loop and the new BPA Bypass are to use this right-of-way after the existing conductors and steel lattice towers are removed. At the location approximately 1.4 miles north of the A8 Substation is a congested area where the A3 line crosses over the existing BPA Midway-Benton #2 230kV line and under the existing BPA Hanford-Ostrander and Hanford-John Day 500kV lines. It is believed that there is not sufficient vertical clearance for a 2 circuit line on steel monopoles to pass underneath the 500kV lines. It is proposed that in this area of congestion, the new North Loop and new BPA Bypass lines diverge onto separate steel lattice towers, perhaps reusing some of the existing A3 towers if feasible. It is also proposed that this may be a good location to



Page 13 of 46


have the new North Loop and PBA Bypass cross each other for easier termination at the A6/Ashe Tap area.

A6 Tap: The existing South Loop is to be broken into two isolated segments. Refer to Appendix 3, Sheet 4, A6 and Ashe Tap Detail. One segment is the portion of the existing South Loop spanning from the A6 Tap to the Ashe Tape. This segment is to be connected to the BPA Bypass at the A6 Tap to become an extension of that line to the Ashe Tap. The remaining segment of the South loop is to be connected to the new North Loop at the A6 tap, extending the North Loop to the A6 Substation.

Ashe Tap: At the BPA owned Ashe Tap, BPA shall connect, remove the existing three-way switch and connect the end of the repurposed South Loop, now the BPA Bypass directly to the line to the Ashe Substation. This will provide a single continuous, uninterrupted line directly connecting the Midway Substation to the Ashe Substation.

NOTE 1: The old North Loop is to be abandoned in place, to be later removed by a separate project. However, the line must be left in a safe and stable condition upon disconnecting the conductors. At each point where the conductors are removed, the adjacent tower or pole will be analyzed and guyed or braced as necessary to prevent overstressing the structure.

See Appendix 1, 30/60/90 Design Deliverables for minimum deliverables expected with the 30% design package.

See Attachment C for the Reliability Engineering Checklist.

Native Files shall be submitted with the 30% design package or within four business days of the design package submittal (Word, Excel, AutoCAD, etc.).

The Subcontractor shall disposition the MSA comments submitted on the 30% design package and submit to MSA for approval. See Section 4.1 for additional expectations on comment disposition using comments and tracked changes in Word documents. If no resubmit is required, the Subcontractor shall incorporate comments and submit with the 60% design package.

If additional geotechnical survey, ground scan, soil sampling/survey, and/or topographical survey is required, the Subcontractor shall request in writing and MSA shall provide.

3.5 Task 3 – Construction Cost and Schedule Estimate

The Subcontractor shall provide a construction cost estimate at a detailed level equal to the degree of design it represents (a conceptual design estimate is typically considered a Class 3 estimate, as defined by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering [AACE] Cost Estimate Classification System). It shall assume a “fixed price construction” method of performance, and include a written Basis of Estimate stating methodologies used, as well as relevant assumptions/exclusions and supporting remarks.



Page 14 of 46


The Subcontractor shall provide an estimated construction schedule for the physical construction of the Project. The schedule shall be in the form of a bar chart (P3, P6, or Microsoft Project preferred, but not required) and shall identify logical sequence and relationship of activities for fieldwork and milestones. Activity durations shall be in working days (Monday through Thursday), a 7-day work week may be used leading up to and during the CGS outage.





The Subcontractor shall disposition the MSA comments submitted on the 60% design package and submit to MSA for approval. See Section 4.1 for additional expectations on comment disposition using comments and tracked changes in Word documents. If no resubmit is required, the Subcontractor shall incorporate comments and submit with the 90% design package.





The Subcontractor shall disposition the MSA comments submitted on the 90% design package and submit to MSA for approval. See Section 4.1 for additional expectations on comment disposition using comments and tracked changes in Word documents. If no resubmit is required, the Subcontractor shall incorporate comments and submit with the final design package.

3.8 Task 6 – 100% Final Design Package

The 100% design package deliverable shall incorporate any final comments submitted during the 90% review and be fully checked and ready for issue and release (including the Design Change Notice [DCN] cover sheets and information required for the Engineering Package [EP]). The 100% package should not include new information, unless it was identified and required at the 90% review or at MSA direction. The 100% design documents shall be Washington State Professional Engineer (PE) stamped/signed.



Page 15 of 46


3.9 Task 7 – Engineering Support for Procurement of Materials

The Subcontractor shall provide engineering services during procurement of materials. This will include reviewing vendor proposals for compliance with technical requirements, reviewing and approving technical submittals (structures, systems and components [SSC] submittals), responding to Request for Clarification/Information (RCI).

3.10 Task 8 – Testing / Startup / Commissioning

3.10.1 Testing Documentation

The Subcontractor shall develop the following test documentation using MSC-PRO-ENG-286, Testing of Equipment and Systems (Table 2, Testing Documentation provides high-level expectations for each type of testing document).

Test Plan – Higher level document defining the required tests, extent of testing, test boundary, testing sequence/schedule, testing methods, rationale for testing, relationships among items tested and other systems, test or inspection controls to be applied, and review and approval requirements.

o The Test Plan shall also identify the Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) as applicable, Construction Acceptance Testing (CAT) and Operational Acceptance Testing (OAT) documentation to support system construction, startup and commissioning. The Subcontractor will be responsible to produce the testing documentation required for the FAT, CAT and OAT.

Test Specification(s) – Identifies specific tests required, test requirements and parameters for each test, and test criteria. Testing may be included as part of the Construction Specification or as a standalone Test Specification.

Test Procedure(s) – Provides detailed instructions for performing tests, the acceptance/success criteria, records results; includes prerequisites, precautions, special equipment, test sequence; identifies hold points; assurance the scope and objectives defined by the associated test requirements are satisfied; and objective evidence and confirmation of successful acceptance or success criteria.

Test Report(s) – Provides a summary of the test results, activities undertaken, and a conclusion of the test results. The Subcontractor shall develop the final outline and format of the Test Report for review and approval by MSA. The construction subcontractor will perform the testing, fill in the required test results, and provide additional documentation as required. The construction subcontractor will submit the final Test Report to MSA for approval.



Page 16 of 46


Test documents may be standalone documents or may be imbedded within a DCN or FMP. For standalone test documents, suggested outlines are provided in MSC-STD-ENG-60816, Engineering Test Documentation.

3.10.2 Operations and Maintenance Manuals

The Subcontractor shall develop necessary manuals and draft procedures for MSA to be able to properly inspect, operate, maintain, and troubleshoot the SSC. See Section 6.4 for more information on MSA procedures.

3.11 Task 9 – Engineering Support During Construction

The Subcontractor shall provide engineering support services during construction. This will include reviewing vendor proposals for compliance with technical requirements, reviewing and approving technical submittals (structures, systems and components [SSC] submittals or construction submittals), responding to Request for Clarification/Information (RCI), creating DCN(s), creating Facility Modification Packages (FMPs), site visits to inspect construction, and attending meetings. An Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) will be required to address potential issues/hazards related to construction site visits (See Section 7.2 for more information on EJTAs).

The basis for the cost of this work shall include:

The assumption of an 18-month commitment beginning at the formal Construction Kick-Off Meeting. The Subcontractor is to provide a cost proposal, construction support payment schedule and basis of estimated quantities for support documents as mentioned below.

The Subcontractor assigning an individual as the Task Lead (TL) (See Section 6.1 for more details on the expectations of the TL). The TL shall work closely with MSA Buyer’s Technical Representative (BTR), MSA Project Engineer and the MSA Project Manager.

Reviewing and approving technical submittals – Quantity estimation to be provided by Subcontractor

Responding to RCIs from the construction subcontractor or other entities – Quantity estimation to be provided by Subcontractor

Major design changes – Quantity estimation to be provided by Subcontractor

A major design change requires the Subcontractor to perform additional design or design rework, review, and approval documented in a DCN and/or FMP.

o DCNs may be required during construction when field conditions or RCIs result in one of the following: design rework, additional drawing sheet(s), or a design



Page 17 of 46


change. The Subcontractor is expected to create new drawings or perform the necessary drawing changes, and fully check and verify design additions/changes.

o FMP revisions may be required during construction when field conditions or RCIs result in one of the following: design rework or a design change. The Subcontractor is expected to perform the necessary drawing changes, and fully check and verify the design changes.

NOTE 1: New calculations may be required to support the design. Existing calculations may require updating depending on the extent of the design change.

NOTE 2: Rework due to Subcontractor design errors and omissions shall be at the Subcontractor’s expense. Rework due to varying field conditions, owner requests, DOE-RL requests, etc. shall be a consideration in the estimated quantity for major design changes.

MSA engineers retain the ability to perform minor design changes throughout the duration of construction. Minor design changes do not affect the intent or function of the original design. Minor changes may include things such as equivalent part substitution, slight relocation of utilities due to field interferences, etc. Performance and tracking of minor changes is with DCNs and/or FMPs. Subcontractor shall receive copies of the DCNs/FMPs as they are issued/released for tracking purposes.

Site Visits – Estimated quantity of 10

o Site visits will include site reviews with MSA and the construction subcontractor to identify any work that is incomplete or requires correction prior to achieving substantial completion. The Subcontractor may choose to include additional site visits to ensure construction is meeting project requirements and expectations at their discretion and noted in the proposal.

3.12 Task 10 – As-Built Drawings

The Subcontractor shall provide as-built drawings and specification(s) at the end of the project. Following construction completion, the Subcontractor is expected to update the drawings and specifications to incorporate all DCNs and FMPs into the final as-built documentation (including those generated by MSA as a minor change described in Section 3.11). The drawings shall depict the final configuration of the work performed and the specification shall be updated to reflect any changes made during construction. The signed and PE stamped as-built drawings and specifications shall be submitted to MSA along with the native files. As-builts will be provided in the form of a DCN and FMP.



Page 18 of 46


As-builts will include, but not limited to:

As-Built Construction Data Book Structure Report (As-Built) Working Files T-Line File Updating Marking and Lighting Database Post Construction LiDAR.

4.0 SUBMITTALS

Subcontractor shall deliver all submittals listed on the Attachment A, Submittal Register to MSA Project Document Control at [email protected] using the Subcontractor Document Submittal Form (Site Form A-6003-061) and carbon copy (CC) the Buyer’s Technical Representative (BTR) and Contract Specialist (CS). All transmittal subject headings shall contain, at a minimum, the subcontract number, task Release number, submittal number, and submittal description. See the Submittal Register for details related to submittal format, type, review cycles, etc.

Forms are available at the following web address under the “Subcontractor Document Forms” link: http://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/ContractorForms

Subcontractor shall submit deliverables in electronic format and may include hard copies (unless hard copies are requested on the Submittal Register or within the SOW). Electronic files must be non-password protected in one of the following formats:

Microsoft® Office Compatible Primavera P6 (XER) Microsoft Project (MMP) Adobe® Reader or Acrobat® (PDF) Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Mathcad Prime 3.1 AutoCAD® (DWG) – 2017 version or older (if newer than 2017, back save to 2013

version with external references bound and exploded) Windows Media Video (MP4).

Due to the size of many of the MSA provided documents and the anticipated file size of the design packages, electronic submittals shall be delivered via a MSA-designated File Transfer Protocol (FTP) site. However, transmittal forms and correspondence will still be sent to Project Document Control.

All engineering submittals must be peer reviewed/quality checked to ensure completeness and accuracy prior to submittal.



Page 19 of 46


Native files for all deliverables shall be provided as noted in the Submittal Register or as requested by the BTR at any point during subcontract performance.

Requests for Clarification/Information are to be provided to the Project Document Control, CC the BTR and the CS, using the Request for Clarification or Information Form (A-6003-063).

4.1 Comment Disposition in Microsoft Word

MSA can more efficiently review and comment on documents, if provided with the native Word file, by posting on a shared website that allows review comment consolidation in one file using tracked changes. This approach assists with comment disposition and incorporation by the Subcontractor. Deletion of MSA comments is non-permissible, disposition within the document is required. Preferred comment or change replies listed below:

Comment reply “accepted” meaning the comment or change is acceptable as proposed.

Comment reply “accepted, see Section X or Appendix X, etc.” meaning the comment or change has been accepted but provided in a different section or part of the document.

Comment reply “rejected because…” meaning the comment or change is rejected by the Subcontractor and a basis for rejection shall be provided (e.g. “rejected, information provided in Section X [a different section than the comment was made]” or “rejected based on direction from the BTR”).

Comment reply “provide additional clarification” meaning the Subcontractor would like more information provided by MSA to properly address/disposition the comment or change.

5.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Subcontractor work products and services shall meet applicable standards as defined in this SOW, HNF-59468 and HNF-59660. All final design documents shall be approved/stamped by the Subcontractor’s current Washington State licensed PE.

At the BTR’s discretion, design submittals that are not accepted may only require resubmittal of the Subcontractor Document Submittal Form with acceptable comment dispositions to be incorporated into subsequent design submittals.

6.0 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT AND STANDARDS

6.1 Design Team Task Lead Expectations

The Subcontractor shall establish a single point of contact to fulfill the role of Task Lead (TL) (e.g., the Subcontractor’s Project Manager). The TL is responsible for coordinating the engineering efforts of the multi-disciplined team in the execution of this subcontract. The TL



Page 20 of 46


shall work closely with the MSA Engineering Manager (or their delegate) and the MSA Project Manager, as applicable, to monitor the design budget and schedule. The TL is responsible for preparation of work plans or assisting in preparation of the deliverables.

The TL is the point of contact for the effort and has overall responsibility for adequacy of design inputs, for establishing technical interfaces and integration of disciplines, and for ensuring that the job is completed in accordance with the specified engineering and quality requirements, procedures, and schedule.

The TL is accountable to:

The MSA Design Authority/Project Engineer(s) to ensure the design products are developed in accordance with the functional requirements and design criteria.

The MSA Engineering Manager and Project Manager for integration of technical work with the project or task scope, schedule, and budget and to ensure the design meets technical requirements, specifications, and quality requirements.

6.2 Design Process

The Subcontractor shall develop design content in accordance with their internal engineering program, process and procedures, except where noted in this SOW.

The Subcontractor shall establish and control design interfaces in accordance with Section 6.3.

The Subcontractor shall document design content in accordance with Section 6.4.

The Subcontractor shall perform an internal design review of their generated designs in accordance with Section 6.5.

6.3 Design Interfaces

Design interfaces shall be identified, documented, and controlled in a specification or on a MSA drawing and be uniquely identified (e.g. lines of demarcation, scope “by others,” etc.).

Design drawings will show demarcation for ownership of equipment the Hanford South Loop (Midway-Hew #2) circuit as being owned and operated by DOE-RL.

Design drawings will show the BPA Bypass (Midway-Ashe No. 1) circuit as being owned and operated by BPA.



Page 21 of 46


6.4 Documentation

Work produced as part of this SOW shall be documented and meet the MSA standards listed in Section 7.1, Engineering Requirements, the statement(s) below, and HNF-59468 and HNF-59660.

Technical Documents. Technical documents shall be prepared in accordance with the Subcontractor’s internal procedures with appropriate editorial and presentation standards employed. Technical documents received by MSA undergo review, approval, and release by MSA using the EP electronic approval and release process in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-440, Engineering Package Process. The Subcontractor shall prepare and finalize the document, and then MSA will initiate the EP and process the package for approval and release. Each document will have a unique document number obtained through the Hanford Document Numbering System (HDNS). MSA will request and supply the document numbers.

Engineering Calculations. New or revised Engineering Calculations shall be prepared and issued in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-8259, MSC Calculation Preparation and Issue. Standalone calculations receive a document number from the HDNS and undergo release by MSA using the EP electronic approval process. Calculation submittals shall include Form A-6007-113, Calculation Peer Review Checklist. The Subcontractor shall prepare and finalize the calculation, and then MSA will initiate the EP and process the package for approval and release.

Engineering Drawings. New or revised Engineering Drawings for release or issue into MSA document control system shall be prepared in accordance with HNF-14660 Offsite Vendor Instructions for Preparation and Control of Engineering Drawings and MSC-PRO-ENG-709, CAD and Drawing Development and Control Process for Engineering Drawings. Drawings submitted as vendor information are exempt from this requirement. See Appendix 2 for list of existing essential, support and reference drawings, and other relevant documents.

Facility Modification Packages (FMP). The FMP process is required for modifications to existing drawings affected by the design. The FMP shall be prepared in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-2001, Facility Modification Package Process. The Subcontractor shall prepare the attached drawings, documents, etc. and then MSA will initiate the EP and process the package for approval and release. Provision of standard AutoCAD borders for FMP continuation pages provided to the Subcontractor upon request. Existing drawings modified using a FMP shall be as-built using a FMP.

Design Change Notices (DCN). The DCN process shall be used to issue new and authorize changes to engineering drawings intended for “Approved for Construction." New or revised DCNs shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-8016, Design Change Notice Process and Form A-6003-324, Design Change Notice. The form also includes instructions along with copies of the forms used for sketches supporting the DCN (both portrait and landscape). New drawings issued using a DCN shall be as-built using a DCN.



Page 22 of 46


Design Analysis. The Subcontractor shall develop design analyses in accordance with their own internal processes. Design analysis documentation shall include:

1. Definition of the objective of the analysis;

2. Definition of analysis inputs and their sources;

3. Results of literature searches or other applicable background data;

4. Identification of assumptions and indication of those that must be verified as the design proceeds;

5. Identification of any computer calculation including computer type, computer program (e.g., name), revision identification, inputs, outputs, evidence of or reference to computer program verification and validation and the bases (or reference hereto) supporting application of the computer program to the specific physical problem;

6. Review and approval.

Native files require submission with the design package submittals for each analysis and subsequent revision.

Standalone design analyses received by MSA (i.e., those not incorporated into a FMP or DCN) will undergo review, approval, and release using the EP process. Design analyses incorporated into a DCN or FMP shall also use Form A-6007-113, Calculation Peer Review Checklist.

Standalone Specifications. New or revised standalone Specifications shall be prepared in accordance with Construction Specification Institute (CSI) MasterFormat. Appropriate editorial and presentation standards shall be employed. Specifications received by MSA will undergo review, approval and release by MSA using the EP electronic approval process in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-440, Engineering Package Process. The Subcontractor shall prepare and finalize the document, and then MSA will initiate the EP and process the package for final approval and release. Each standalone document will have a unique document number obtained through the HDNS. The Subcontractor shall provide a list of specifications, and then MSA will request and supply the document numbers.

Specifications as Part of a DCN or FMP. Specifications included in a DCN or FMP shall be prepared in accordance with the Subcontractor’s internal procedures with appropriate editorial and presentation standards employed. Typically, these are included on Project or task specific drawing sheets. If using drawing sheets, the drawings shall be developed in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-709, HNF-14660, and MSC-PRO-ENG-2001.

Test Documentation. Testing documentation including Test Plan, Test Specification(s), Test Procedures(s), and Test Report(s) shall be developed in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-286. Outlines for each of the document types are included in MSC-STD-ENG-60816. Templates



Page 23 of 46


provided by MSA and the procedure outlines can serve as a starting point; the Subcontractor can make additions/deletions as necessary using a graded approach to meet requirements of the Project.

MSA Procedures. New or revised procedures for Operations and Maintenance shall be developed or modified per MSC-PLN-MN-56352, Maintenance Management Plan and in accordance with MSC-PRO-MS-589, Mission Support Contract Management System Documents.

6.5 Design Reviews

The preparation, checking, verification, review, approval, and release of all design media needed for the design is included in this SOW. MSA may conduct design reviews on design packages developed under this subcontract in accordance with internal MSA procedures and guides. MSA Engineering will conduct formal design reviews at the 30%, 60%, and 90% design stages. The MSA-conducted design reviews are not to be construed as design verification approval.

Each design product shall be checked, reviewed, and approved internally by the Subcontractor prior to providing the design package to MSA for review, comment, and subsequent approval. Accuracy of the content and checking for technical adequacy should be appropriate for the stage of design unless otherwise requested by the MSA Design Authority and/or Project Engineer. Design products submitted shall be so noted by watermark or stamp that clearly reflects the stage of design completion (e.g., “30% preliminary” or “Rev. A,” etc.). In all cases, the deliverable package shall include an index of the information provided, placeholders for “planned” additions, and be a complete, accurate, and quality conscious representation of the design effort conducted to date.

6.6 Design Verification

The Subcontractor shall submit a design verification plan for all designs as part of the detailed work execution plan (see Section 7.0) to MSA for review and approval. The design verification plan shall describe the method of implementing and documenting reviews to the extent possible, understanding that the design is not yet fully developed and refinement of the plan may be required as the design progresses.

The Subcontractor shall fully check the final design stage (90%) products in accordance with their approved Quality Assurance Program and internal implementing procedures. MSA considers 90% design products to be ready for final release/issue and/or construction. In addition to technical adequacy, checking shall address drafting standard compliance (where applicable as defined in Section 6.4), editorial errors, and overall workmanship.

The Subcontractor shall submit evidence of final design verification documenting the design verification method(s) used (e.g., peer review, alternate calculation, etc.), completed checklists, required verification matrices, etc.



Page 24 of 46


6.7 As-Built Process

The Subcontractor shall have a documented as-built process as part of their engineering program procedures to ensure as-building activities will depict the post-installation physical facility conditions. Subcontractor shall submit as-built documentation to MSA in the form of a DCN and/or FMP, or other document type as described in Section 6.4.

7.0 REQUIREMENTS

The Subcontractor shall provide a detailed Work Execution Plan that includes design approach, design development description and rationale, high-level design schedule, design verification strategy (see Section 6.6), design review meetings (see Section 9.3), and key support personnel. The design approach shall provide a detailed understanding of the entire scope of this SOW. The Subcontractor shall include a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and associated WBS descriptions as necessary in the design schedule. General

For any work performed on the Hanford Site or any MSA controlled facility, the provisions of the Special Provisions – On-Site, will apply to Subcontractor personnel.

7.1 Engineering Requirements

The Subcontractor shall follow the applicable engineering procedures listed in Attachment B, Applicable Engineering Procedures.

7.2 Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Requirements

Subcontractor personnel attending meetings or performing walk downs on the Hanford Site will be covered under the MSA General Hazards Analysis (GHA). The GHA covers hazards that are commonly encountered during the performance of daily routine activities. Any changes to the scope or associated activities shall be reviewed by the MSA Safety Professional for any potential impacts to the Subcontractor or lower-tier subcontractor employees.

Subcontractor personnel and lower-tier subcontractors shall be responsible to complete an Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) in accordance with MSC-PRO-WP-11058, Occupational Medical Qualification and Monitoring using EJTA for any of the following situations:

a. For any Subcontractor or lower-tier subcontractor employee who will be on the Hanford Site for more than 30 days in a year

b. For any Subcontractor or lower-tier subcontractor employee who may potentially be exposed to hazards (e.g. radiological, beryllium, hazardous wastes, noise) while performing in accordance with the subcontract SOW



Page 25 of 46


c. For any Subcontractor or lower-tier subcontractor employee enrolled in a medical or exposure monitoring program required by 10 CFR 851, and/or any other applicable federal, state or local regulation or other obligation.

If any of the above conditions are met, the Subcontractor and its lower-tier subcontractor employees are to have a current approved EJTA prior to that employee beginning work on the Hanford Site.

Any changes to the scope or associated activities shall be reviewed by the MSA Safety Professional for any potential impacts to the Subcontractor or lower-tier subcontractor employees.

MSA’s Safety and Health Procedures are available on the internet at http://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/Construction. The documents on this site are kept current and are available for the Subcontractor use.

The Subcontractor shall flow down all ES&H requirements to the lowest-tier subcontractor performing work in support of this SOW and associated activities.

7.3 Quality Assurance (QA) Requirements

The work activities for this SOW have been designated as Quality Level (QL) 3, General Service (GS) by the applicable Design Authority.

The Subcontractor shall document, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance Program (QAP) that utilizes a national or international voluntary consensus standard or equivalent (i.e. International Standards Organization (ISO) 9001, etc.) that include the following requirements, as a minimum:

Organizational structure, including a description of roles and responsibilities

QAP which describes the process to control items and activities

Indoctrination, training, and qualification and/or certification of project personnel

Design control, including design verification/validation, change control, and software quality requirements to ensure software produces correct results

Implementing procedures and/or instructions that describe step by step activities

Document control to ensure only correct documents are being used

Corrective action management to identify and correct issues that lead to process improvements



Page 26 of 46


Quality records, which are protected from loss or deterioration and are submitted.

Upon award of the subcontract (see Attachment A, Submittal Register for due date), the QAP document and implementing procedures are required to be reviewed and approved by the MSA Quality Assurance Organization. If the Subcontractor’s QAP has been previously submitted and approved by MSA, and is current, the Subcontractor may submit a statement to this effect with the proposal and for the submittal requirement. If the Subcontractor’s QAP has been previously submitted and approved by MSA, but is not current, the updated QAP shall undergo resubmission to MSA for review and approval. The Subcontractor shall submit proposed changes to the QAP and implementing procedures to the Buyer/Quality Assurance Engineer (QAE)/CS for review and approval prior to implementation during the performance of this Subcontract.

The Subcontractor shall be responsible for performing quality workmanship and shall conduct the quality control measures necessary to ensure that all work conforms to referenced codes, standards, and other requirements as defined by this SOW.

If the Subcontractor subcontracts any portion of this work scope to lower-subcontractors, the Subcontractor shall be responsible for the flow down of applicable portions of this SOW to their lower-tier subcontractors, including engineering and quality assurance requirements, pertaining to services and activities for which they are responsible.

All Subcontractor activities are subject to oversight by MSA’s QAE and/or Engineering representative(s) at the Subcontractor’s facilities, including lower-tier facilities if applicable. For requesting access to the Subcontractor or lower-tier’s facilities, the request shall be coordinated through the Subcontractor’s contract representative and MSA’s CS. MSA may perform the visit jointly with the Subcontractor if desired.

If this SOW conflicts with the Contract Documents, the Contract Documents shall take precedence.

7.4 Government Property

The Subcontractor is not required to use government property in the performance of this SOW.

7.5 Commercial Off the Shelf Software

The Subcontractor shall submit the following documentation for all engineering analysis/design, data analysis/reduction, and engineering/environmental modeling commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software1 (application) used in the performance of work activities. Documentation shall

1 COTS software refers to an existing application which will be implemented on a standard operating system without the need for modification of its executable/object code.



Page 27 of 46


be provided even if the applications are verified through manual verification/independent calculations and/or analyses.

NOTE: If the same COTS product is utilized for a range of calculations this documentation only needs to be submitted once, but documents/calculations shall be traceable back to number 1 specified below and is subject to oversight activities.

1. Description of the COTS software including:

a. Manufacturer’s name and address

b. COTS application’s title and version identifier

c. Operating system and hardware platform that will be used

d. Manufacturer’s Technical Specifications or other published description of the COTS.

2. Standard data set(s) used to verify operation of the COTS application

a. Data sets shall cover each function or mode of operation to be used during the performance of the work activities.

b. When the COTS application’s range of operation cannot be verified by a single data set, the Subcontractor shall submit, as a minimum, data sets covering the upper and lower thirds of its range.

3. Subcontractor shall notify MSA of any software errors related to COTS deliverables.

COTS requirements are also detailed in the Contract Documents. If this SOW conflicts with the Contract Documents, the Contract Documents shall be followed.

8.0 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS

Subcontractor personnel performing engineering services shall have appropriate training, experience, qualification, and/or certification(s) to perform the work required for this SOW. Documentation/certification of personnel qualifications shall be maintained by the Subcontractor and provided to MSA upon request. Subcontractor personnel qualifications/certifications may be verified by MSA prior to performing work in order to provide reasonable assurance that the Subcontractor has assigned the personnel with sufficient documented training, education, and experience to satisfy the specified requirements.



Page 28 of 46


8.1 Required Qualifications

Subcontractor shall ensure that its personnel meet and maintain the appropriate training, qualification and certification requirements.

Qualification Standards

In order to be considered for award, offerors shall possess, at a minimum, the following qualifications:

The Lead Engineer must have an electrical engineering degree with a minimum of ten years’ experience in transmission line design and/or construction.

The Lead Engineer must have a current Washington State Professional Engineer license.

Other engineers reviewing design and/or other technical documents must have an electrical engineering degree with a minimum of five years’ experience in transmission line design and/or construction.

The Subcontractor shall have a minimum five years’ experience successfully completing design, or oversight of a comparable size and scope to the L-612 Project.

8.2 Training Requirements

The table below includes the training requirements associated with this SOW.

Table 2. Training Requirements

Hours Course Number Description 4 000001 HGET* – Computer-Based Training (CBT) 4 110001 MSA General Employee Training (MGET) - CBT 4 044391 Portable Ladder Safety - CBT 3 020147 Fall Hazard Recognition and Prevention 1 020193 Heat Stress -CBT

*In lieu of HGET, employees may complete the Hanford Site Orientation (HSO), which the Subcontractor receives at their location.

Some courses may only require a limited number of employees, not ALL employees, to attend in order to complete a specific task for the scope and associated activities.

The Subcontractor shall be responsible for all wages of their employees or lower-tier subcontractor employees while attending any required training courses. MSA will schedule and furnish Hanford Site-specific training courses at no cost to the Subcontractor.

CBT training may be coordinated through Vivid Learning Systems, 509-372-0335.



Page 29 of 46


Any changes to the scope or associated activities shall undergo review by the MSA Safety and Training Professionals for any potential impacts to the Subcontractor or lower-tier subcontractor employees.

The Subcontractor shall flow down all training requirements, as applicable, to the lowest tier subcontractor performing work in support of this SOW and associated activities.

8.3 Security and Badging Requirements

Subcontractor personnel attending meetings, performing walk downs on the Hanford Site, or accessing a controlled access facility shall obtain a standard or temporary badge.

A standard badge shall be obtained by filling out and sending a Badge Request Form to the CS. Once authorized, present two forms of identification or the enhanced identification at the MSA Central Badging Office.

For a temporary badge, send the name, company (who they work for) and if they are a U.S citizen to the CS. Once authorized, present two forms of identification or the enhanced identification at the MSA Central Badging Office. If the employee was not born in the U.S. (the place of birth is outside of the U.S.) then the naturalization paperwork must also be provided.

For more information on badging, please see the MSA Procurement Website at: https://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/safetyandsecurity

Subcontractor personnel attending meetings, performing walk downs on the Hanford Site, and/or accessing any Hanford facility shall be familiar with Hanford Site emergency management requirements and response expectations to Hanford Site Emergency Alerting System warnings or sirens. Subcontractor personnel shall also participate in any emergency preparedness drill or exercise that may be taking place unless otherwise exempted by the Drill/Exercise Coordinator.

Subcontractor employees will be required to submit to vehicle searches and not personally carry or transport certain prohibited articles.

8.4 Work Location / Potential Access Requirements

A majority of work activities will be performed at the Subcontractor’s facilities. Project meetings and/or field walk downs may be performed on the Hanford Site and in Richland WA. MSA anticipates the Subcontractor will not access any radiological controlled areas for which additional radiological training is required.

MSA shall provide escort to Subcontractor for field walk downs. Subcontractor shall coordinate with MSA to schedule escort at least four working days prior to walk down.



Page 30 of 46


8.5 Site Access and Work Hours

Hanford personnel at the Hanford Site work a standard 4/10 schedule. The standard workweek consists of ten (10) hours of work between 6:00 am and 4:30 pm, with one-half hour designated as an unpaid period for lunch, Monday through Thursday.

Work performed outside normal operating hours, while on the Hanford Site, shall be coordinated and/or approved through the BTR and/or the CS prior to performing the work.

9.0 MEETINGS

Subcontractor shall participate in all meetings as required by the BTR.

General purpose of meetings is for the coordination, control, and direction of the work. In addition to meetings addressed by this Section, the Subcontractor may be required by other Sections and other Subcontract documents to conduct special-purpose meetings and various safety meetings and briefings.

Table 3. Meeting Attendance

Task No.

Attendance in Person Description Mandatory Optional

N/A X Design Kick-Off Meeting N/A X Design Progress Meetings

1 X Functional Requirements and Design Criteria 2 X 30% Design Review Meeting 3 X Construction Cost and Schedule Estimate 4 X 60% Design Review Meeting 5 X 90% Design Review Meeting 6 X 100% Design Package 7 X Procurement of Materials Support 8 X Testing/Startup/Commissioning, Meet with Operations 9 X Construction Kick-Off Meeting 9 X Construction Progress Meetings 10 X As-Built Drawings

9.1 Subcontract Kick-Off Meeting

Prior to the start of work, a kick-off meeting will be held between MSA and the Subcontractor at a time and location agreed to by both parties. Invited attendees will include MSA, Subcontractor, and others having an interest in the work. The purpose of the meeting is to coordinate the start or work, discuss the Subcontractor’s scope, deliverable due dates, information transfer, reviews, meetings, reporting, etc.



Page 31 of 46


9.2 Design Progress Meetings

MSA and the Subcontractor shall meet on a regular basis to demonstrate the design status/progress at a time, location and frequency determined by MSA. Invited attendees will include MSA, Subcontractor, and others having an interest in the work. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues and proposed resolutions, review schedule, discuss comments, and provide on-the-spot answers.

9.3 Design Review Meetings

Design review meeting will be held to ensure the design objectives are achieved. The meeting will be held after the design packages have been received by MSA, and prior to MSA submitting comments. The design review meeting shall be included in the Subcontractor’s Work Execution Plan, including the proposed method of implementing and documenting the review meeting. The final time and location will be determined by MSA, but within the Subcontractor’s Work Execution Plan. Attendees will include MSA Project personnel and the Subcontractor. Other invitees may include MSA personnel from Operations, Maintenance, Safety, Environmental, Quality Assurance, Facilities, Procurement, and Engineering.

9.4 Construction Progress Meetings

The Subcontractor shall participate in the construction progress meetings with MSA and the construction subcontractor. Invited attendees will include MSA, Subcontractor, construction subcontractor, and others having an interest in the work. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues and proposed resolutions, review schedule, discuss comments, and provide on-the-spot answers. The Subcontractor may attend the meetings via conference call.

10.0 DELIVERABLES AND PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS

10.1 Deliverables

All deliverables associated with this SOW have been identified in Attachment A, Submittal Register. The Subcontractor shall maintain a project schedule to ensure completion of design deliverables. On a weekly basis, the Subcontractor shall be prepared to report progress on the MSA Project Schedule maintained by the MSA Project Team. Status reporting is expected to include the completion date(s) and percent complete for each deliverable.

10.2 Schedule

The period of performance for this scope of work is established as:

Start Date: Date of Subcontract Award Completion Date: See Subcontract Award



Page 32 of 46


A project schedule shall be submitted for approval by MSA covering activities for the duration of the subcontract. The schedule shall be in the form of a bar chart (P3, P6, or Microsoft Project preferred, but not required) and shall identify logical sequence and relationship of activities for design, submittals, comment incorporation/disposition, and milestones. Activity durations shall be in working days (Monday through Thursday).

Milestones to be on or before the date in the table below.

Table 4. Schedule Milestones

Key Milestones Task No. Hard Date Kick-Off Meeting 10/10/2019

30% Milestone 1, 2 & 3 11/20/2019 60% Milestone 4 & 7 01/09/2020 90% Milestone 5 02/13/2020 100% Milestone 6 & 8 03/19/2020

Construction Support 9 Per Approved Schedule As-Built Drawing 10 Per Approved Schedule

10.3 Payment Schedule

Subcontractor shall propose progress payment schedule (Schedule of Values) based on completion of Tasks with consideration to the WBS as identified in the Engineering Work Execution Plan.

11.0 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

11.1 Reporting Administration

Status reports shall be submitted at the request of the BTR. The Subcontractor shall provide status at the progress meetings.

11.2 Lines of Communication

Under no circumstances shall the Subcontractor interact directly with other MSA subcontractors (construction subcontractor, etc.), DOE-RL, BPA, or other regulatory agencies without prior authorization from the BTR and the Manager of EU.

All communications shall be directed through MSA unless the BTR has specifically authorized communication between the Subcontractor and one of the entities listed above. Authorized communication with other entities shall be technical in nature. Any communications that change or have the potential to change the cost, schedule, scope or quality of either this subcontract or the subcontract with another entity shall be discontinued, and the BTR and CS shall be notified immediately.



Page 33 of 46


APPENDIX 1 - 30/60/90 Design Deliverables

General Expectations

30% Design Package – The Subcontractor shall demonstrate their understanding of the FRD/FDC/FRDC and overall objective of the project. The design documentation shall include the level of information required for MSA to evaluate whether the design is meeting project expectations, if a course correction may be required, or if the project requirements need re-evaluated. The documentation shall also demonstrate what additional information (drawings/documents) will be required to complete the design and what MSA can expect to see in future design packages.

60% Design Package – MSA expects the 60% design package to be “biddable” and “buildable.” This means the package contains a sufficient amount of detail for a construction subcontractor to estimate and bid the project, and build the project in the field. The 60% package should include, at minimum, a draft of each drawing sheet, specification, or calculation in a form that allows reviewers to understand how the design meets the FRDC and overall project intent. If certain details are or information is omitted, a placeholder and explanation shall be included.

90% Design Package – As stated in Section 6.6, MSA expects the 90% design package to be fully checked and ready for final issue/release and/or construction. In addition to technical adequacy, checking shall address drafting standard compliance, editorial errors, and overall workmanship.

100% Design Package – MSA should not see any new information in the 100% design package not previously reviewed in earlier package submittals. This deliverable shall incorporate any final comments submitted during the 90% review and be fully ready for issue and release, including PE stamps as required.

General Order of Drawings:

1. Cover Sheet / Title Sheet 2. Plans / Electrical One-Line (high level view) 3. Elevations / Plan and Profile 4. Sections 5. Details 6. Schedules

NOTE: The below table represents the minimum expected deliverables to be included with each of the 30%, 60% and 90% design packages. The list may not be an all-inclusive list, as the design progresses additional deliverables may be identified by the project team and/or Subcontractor.



Page 34 of 46


30 60 90 Description of Deliverable DRAWINGS

Drawing Lists, Design Package Cover Sheets and Title Sheets Complete List of Drawings for Final Package – The list of drawings,

specifications, calculations, etc. provided with the 30% design package will be used to obtain H-series drawing numbers, calculation and specification document numbers from the Hanford Document Numbering System (HDNS). The numbers obtained through HDNS post-30% shall appear on the 60% design package. (Document numbers can be obtained prior to the 30% design submittal upon request by the Subcontractor)

Existing Drawings – 30% identify list of drawings to be modified and provide FMP drawings for drafting approach.

New Drawings – Existing drawings will be released using the FMP process. New drawings will be issued with a DCN. New and existing drawings shall appear in a format that will support the design package that will issue/release them (e.g. Existing drawings may use the WAS/IS format with the typical FMP border, while new drawings will appear as full size sheets with the standard drawing border in accordance with HNF-14660). (See Section 6.4, MSC-PRO-ENG-2001 for FMPs and MSC-PRO-ENG-8016 for DCNs).

FMP EP Information – MSA will initiate the EP and route the package for approval, but will require information from the Subcontractor to complete the electronic form (see MSC-PRO-ENG-440 for information required for the EP).

DCN Cover Sheets – Current revision of Form A-6003-324 filled out completely and accurately. Form instructions are available.

Title Sheet / Drawing Index / General Notes and Legend Submit revised Construction Data Book

Demolition (as necessary for new North Loop construction) Demolition General Notes, Legend, Abbreviations, and List of Demolition

Drawings Demolition Plans Existing Structures and Drawings to be Removed Demolition Details

Civil / Structural Civil / Structural General Notes, Legend, Abbreviations, and List of Civil and

Structural Drawings Civil Site Plan – Including project boundary, call-outs for alignments,

references to plan / profile drawing sheets, etc.



Page 35 of 46


30 60 90 Description of Deliverable Enlarged Site Plan as needed Structure Optimization Strategy (as compared to the Hanford South Loop) Civil Details – Including schedules, cross sections, bollards, signage, etc. Foundation Plan – Including point coordinate table Engineered Steel Poles Design Criteria Drawings New Structure List Review and Approve Plan and Profile Maps Stringing Location Designation Surveying, Mapping and GIS Photomaps

Electrical Electrical General Notes, Legend, Abbreviations, List of Electrical Drawings One-Line Diagram(s) Electrical Site Plan Grounding Plan (may be included with Power Plan) Lightning Protection List Identifying Major Electrical Equipment / Components Equipment Schedule – Incorporate 30% Electrical Equipment/Component Electrical Equipment Label Schedule – per EU PRO-ENG-60788, Rev 0-1,

Electrical Utilities Equipment and System Numbering Arc Flash Calculation at Transformer Primaries at A6, A8 and A9 Phasing Diagram Conductor, Hardware, and Accessories Drawings OHGW, Hardware, and Accessories Drawings Stockbridge Damper Installation Drawings Spiral Vibration Damper Installation Drawings Bird Flight Diverter Drawings Jumper Support String Location Drawings Ice Shield Installation Drawings Obstruction Marking and Lighting Drawings Structure Grounding (Counterpoise) Requirement Drawings Conductor Stringing and Sag Instructions



Page 36 of 46


30 60 90 Description of Deliverable Conductor Stringing Tabulations Conductor Stringing Charts Conductor Ground Resistivity Studies and Report

Mechanical Mechanical General Notes, Legend, Abbreviations, List of Drawings Tower Diagrams Material List and Material by Locations

IT / Telecommunications IT / Telecommunication General Notes, Legend, Abbreviations, and List of

Drawings Telecommunications Plan

Drafting Preliminary Drafting Review – Provide at least one AutoCAD file per

discipline for review by MSA CADD organization for compliance with HNF-14660.

Detailed Drafting Review Long Lead Procurement Items

Identify Long Lead Procurement Items Draft Specification(s) for Long Lead Items Final Specification(s) for Long Lead Items Identify Major Pieces of Equipment

Safety Design drawings will include the Installation of Latchways fall protection

system on the new steel poles and lattice towers per BPA STD-DT-000098 (Coordinate with MSA Latchway)

SPECIFICATIONS Draft Construction Specification – Standalone construction specification shall

follow the CSI MasterFormat. The 30% submittal shall be a fully annotated outline including as much standard information as available such as: applicable codes and standards, submittals, industry standard quality requirements, industry standard testing and inspection requirements and other “boilerplate” information.

Construction Specification – The 60% construction specification should appear close to the final product. The 60% submittal will be reviewed for completeness and project-specific requirements and information.

Identify List of Procurement Specifications



Page 37 of 46


30 60 90 Description of Deliverable Initial Draft of Long Lead Item Procurement Specification Final Procurement Specification for Long Lead Procurement Items (After

review of the 30% list of procurement specifications, the final procurement specification for certain items may be requested at 60% to allow MSA to start the procurement process for the material(s) before 100% design is complete)

Initial Draft of Non-Long Lead Item Procurement Specification Final Procurement Specification for Non-Long Lead Procurement Items Supplemental Construction Technical Specifications (BPA specifications to be

provided by MSA) Master Submittal Register for Construction – A submittal register in the

standard MSA format to be included in the construction SOW that is fully aligned with the final project construction specification.

CALCULATIONS Identify List of Calculations (e.g. arch flash, line tensioning, sag, line

impedance, strain on towers at corners and dead ends, etc.) Conductor Length Calculations Clipping and Sag Offset Calculations Lightning Protection Risk Assessment Perform Calculations Calculation Checklists – Submit Calculation Checklist Form A-6007-113

required to accompany each calculation for release. (See Section 6.4 and MSC-PRO-ENG-8259 for more information)

BILL OF MATERIALS Complete Project Bill-of-Materials

TESTING DOCUMENTATION Test Plan Annotated Outline Test Plan in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-286 and MSC-PRO-ENG-60816 Draft Test Procedure(s) in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-286 and

MSC-PRO-ENG-60816 Draft Test Report in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-286 and

MSC-PRO-ENG-60816 COST ESTIMATING

Construction Cost Estimate (update estimate from Task 3 at the 60% and 90% design package deliverable)

Bill-of-Materials Cost Estimate



Page 38 of 46


30 60 90 Description of Deliverable OTHER

Reliability and Design Checklist (See Attachment C) – For 60/90, keep the information from the previous version(s) unchanged from the approved submittal. Fill out the section associated with that design package (e.g. at 90% design review. MSA should be able to see how the design has evolved to address reliability of the system.

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Design Requirements Compliance Matrix – Matrix of project design

requirements, which may come from a number of sources, such as: FDC, FRD, FRDC, specifications, codes, standards, environmental permits, etc. The matrix shall include, at a minimum, identification of each requirement, source of the requirement, methodology used to verify the requirement (inspection, test, calculation, drawing, etc.), and ensure acceptance criteria has been established. Acceptance criteria shall include the specific document and section number, drawing and sheet number, etc. reference and HOW the requirement has been met.

NATIVE FILES Native Drawing Files (.dwg) –30/60/90 Other Native Files - Native files for Word documents (.doc, .docx), excel (.xls,

.xlsx), MathCAD, and any other native files. Native files (especially Word files) assist MSA in the review process by allowing reviewers to provide tracked changes type comments making comment disposition / incorporation easier.



Page 39 of 46


APPENDIX 2 - Drawing and/or Document List

Drawings and/or documents listed below will be provided after contract award.

Existing Essential Drawings

Drawing No. Sht. Rev. Description Rel. Date

1. H-5-102 001 41 Electrical 230 KV Signal Line Switching Diagram 04/06/2016

2. H-5-255 001 17 Electrical Utilities High Voltage Lines 04/11/2017








10. H-2-829795 001 6 A6 230 KV & 13.8 KV Simplified One-Line 02/05/2013



Page 40 of 46


Existing Support Drawings


1. H-6-13436 001 13 230 KV Impedance Diagram 06/11/2018

2. H-5-71616 001 00 230-KV Lines Ashe-A6 / A6-A8 Title Page / Site Map 06/24/2001

3. H-1-93101 001 2 A9 Substation PCB A392 Three Line Diagram 07/17/2012

4. H-1-93101 003 1 A9 Substation PCB A396 Three Line Diagram 07/132011

Reference Drawings


1. None

Other

Document Number Rev. Description Rel. Date

1. HNF-59468 0 Functional Requirements Document L-612, 230 kV Transmission System Reconditioning and Sustainability Repairs

Nov 3, 2015

2. HNF-59660 0 Functional Design Criteria L-612, 230 kV Transmission System Reconditioning and Sustainability Repairs.

Jan 26, 2016



Page 41 of 46


MSA Provided Documents: (The following documents will be provided to the Subcontractor upon request after award of the subcontract)

Document Name/Title Document Description

1. Current Construction Data Book (CDB)

A BPA created compilation of relevant documents defining the design parameters for the finished design.

2. HNF-FRDC-63870 Functional Requirements and Design Criteria for, L-612, 230kV Transmission System Reconditioning and Sustainability Repairs. (Draft)

3. Current Configuration Drawings Drawings created by BPA for a nearly identical project

4. Current Construction Step Plan A BPA created document of step-by-step summary of each task needing to be performed and the sequencing of these tasks for a nearly identical project.

5. Revised Construction Step Plan The above document edited by MSA tailored to this project and with the removal of tasks that are still to be performed by BPA

6. LiDAR Geospatial Data Mapping data for most of the proposed right-of-way

7. Current Geotechnical Report Soil survey for most of the proposed right-of-way

8. Draft National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

9. Environmental Assessment (EA)

10. MOA with regional Tribes Memo of Agreement with the regional Tribes consenting to the changes in land use



Page 42 of 46


Document Name/Title Document Description

11. Project ROW and APE A map defining the right-of-way for the new Transmission Lines and the Area of Potential Effect (i.e.: the limits of the allowable construction work zone)

12. BPA 100% Design A design for a nearly identical project containing the following documents: Structure List (if available), Phasing Diagrams, One Line Diagram, Plot Plans, Structure Drawings, Hardware Assembly Drawings, Plans and Profiles, Prohibited Zones (WIDS and Wells) and Known Underground Utilities

13. BPA Design Standards (All work must meet BPA standards)

NOTE: The above lists of drawings and/or documents are not all-inclusive. During development of design, additional drawings or documents may be identified.



Page 43 of 46


APPENDIX 3 - Sketches

SHEET 1: ROUTING OVERVIEW

LEGEND EXISTING HANFORD LINES BE REMOVED EXISTING HANFORD LINES TO BE REUSED NEW LINES TO BE CONSTRUCTED (2 CIRCUITS) EXISTING HANFORD SOUTH LOOP EXISTING HANFORD ABANDONED LINES HANFORD LINE TO BECOME BPA LINE EXISTING BPA LINES

COLUMBIA RIVER

Riverland Road

SR

24

MIDWAY SUBSTATION

Ro

ute

6

Route 11A

Route 1 Route 1

Ro

ute

4N

R

ou

te 4

S

A8 SUBSTATION

A6 SUBSTATION

A9 SUBSTATION

A7 SUBSTATION (BYPASSED)

ASHE TAP (TO BE REMOVED

BY BPA)

EXISTING HANFORD

SOUTH LOOP

NEW A9 TAP

OLD NORTH LOOP TO BE DISCONNECTED

REMOVE ABANDONED A3 LINES AND INSTALL

NEW NORTH LINE OVER EXISTING RIGHT OF

WAY

INSTALL NEW NORTH LOOP AND

BPA BYPASS

REUSE EXISTING TOWERS AND CONDUCTORS FROM OLD NORTH LOOP AS A9 SPUR

EXISTING HANFORD LINES TO BE

TURNED OVER TO BPA AS PART OF

BPA BYPASS

EXISTING ABANDONED

A3 LINES

INSTALL NEW NORTH LOOP AND

BPA BYPASS




Page 44 of 46


SHEET 2: MIDWAY SUBSTATION

LEGEND EXISTING LINE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING LINE TO BE REUSED NEW BPA BYPASS (MIDWAY – ASHE) NEW NORTH LOOP (DOE MIDWAY HEW #1) EXISTING SOUTH LOOP (DOE MIDWAY HEW #2) EXISTING BPA LINES HANFORD LINE TO BECOME BPA LINE EXISTING HANFORD ABANDONED LINE

RIVERLAND ROAD

MIDWAY SUBSTATION

NEW NORTH LOOP (DOE MIDWAY HEW #1)

OLD NORTH LOOP (TO BE DISCONNECTED)

REUSE EXISTING ONE CIRCUIT STEEL

LATTICE TOWERS

INSTALL NEW ONE CIRCUIT LINE STEEL MONOPOLE TOWERS

BPA TO MOVE EXISTING BPA LINES TO NEW TERMINATION

POINT IN SUBSTATION



Page 45 of 46


SHEET 3: MIDWAY AREA DETAIL A9 TAP DETAIL


SR

24

Riverland Road

MIDWAY SUBSTATION


EXISTING HANFORD

SOUTH LOOP


NEW NORTH LOOP AND NEW BPA BYPASS

NEW A9 TAP

A9 SUBSTATION

A7 SUBSTATION (BYPASSED)

REUSE EXISTING NORTH LOOP

SEGMENT

Route 1

ABANDONED A3 LINE





Page 46 of 46


SHEET 4:

A3 RIGHT-OF-WAY DETAIL A6 AND ASHE TAP DETAIL


THIS SEGMENT OF ABANDONED A3 LINE

REMAINS ABANDONED

Route 11A

THIS SEGMENT OF ABANDONED A3 LINES WILL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW NORTH LINE INSTALLED OVER

THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

SPLIT FROM ONE 2-CIRCUIT LINE ON STEEL MONOPOLES (CONDUCTORS VERTICALLY SEPARATED) TO TWO 1-CIRCUIT LINES

ON STEEL LATTICE TOWERS (CONDUCTORS HORIZONTALLY SEPARATED) TO PASS OVER BPA MIDWAY-BENTON #2 LINES AND

UNDER BPA HANFORD-OSTRANDER AND HANFORD-JOHN DAY LINES

BPA Midway-Benton #1 115KV

EXISTING HANFORD

SOUTH LOOP

A8 SUBSTATION

Route 11A


EXISTING HANFORD

SOUTH LOOP

A6 SUBSTATION

BPA OWNED ASHE TAP

BPA MIDWAY-BENTON #1 115KV

REMOVE ONE SPAN BETWEEN TOWERS OF HANFORD SOUTH LOOP

THIS SECTION OF HANFORD SOUTH LOOP BECOMES AN

EXTESION OF THE BPA BYPASS

EXISTING HANFORD OLD NORTH LOOP TO BE DISCONNECTED

CONNECT NEW BPA BYPASS TO EXISTING ISOLATED SECTION OF HANFORD

SOUTH LOOP

CONNECT NEW NORTH LOOP TO

EAST LEG OF A6 TAP

NEW HANFORD NORTH LOOP

NEW BPA BYPASS