STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS

FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE LOS ANGELES

CONTRACT CITIES LIABILITY TRUST FUND CLAIMS BOARD

HELD IN THE CITY OF NORWALK, COMMUNITY MEETING CENTER

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM, 13200 CLARKSDALE AVENUE,

NORWALK, CALIFORNIA 90650

ON

WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 2013, AT 11:00 AM

Members Present: Chair Curtis Morris, Margaret Finlay, Harold Hofmann,

Mark Alexander, Michael Egan, Doug Prichard, and Sam Olivito

Alternates Present: Darrell George, David Spence, and Cheri Kelley 1. Call to Order. 2. Opportunity for members of the public to address the Contract Cities

Liability Trust Fund Claims Board on items of interest within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Claims Board. No members of the public addressed the Claims Board.

3. Closed Session – Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9).

a. Estate of Jonathan Cuevas v. County of Los Angeles United States District Court Case No. CV 11-08297

This lawsuit concerns allegations of excessive force shooting and wrongful death by Sheriff's Deputies.

Action Taken: The Contract Cities Liability Trust Fund Claims Board recommended to the Board of Supervisors the settlement of this matter in the amount of $875,000. Vote: Ayes: 7 -- Curtis Morris, Mark Alexander, Margaret Finlay,

Michael Egan, Doug Prichard, Harold Hofmann and Sam Olivito

See Supporting Document

HOA.1041275.1

b. M.L., a minor, at al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al. Norwalk Superior Court Case No. VC 058338

This lawsuit concerns allegations of excessive force shooting by Sheriff's Deputies. Action Taken: The Contract Cities Liability Trust Fund Claims Board recommended to the Board of Supervisors the settlement of this matter in the amount of $311,500. Vote: Ayes: 7 -- Curtis Morris, Mark Alexander, Margaret Finlay,

Michael Egan, Doug Prichard, Harold Hofmann and Sam Olivito

See Supporting Document

4. Closed Session – Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 54956.9)

a. Estate of Christian Cobian v. County of Los Angeles, et al. Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC 483709 No reportable action was taken. b. William F. v. County of Los Angeles, et al. Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC 437875 No reportable action was taken. c. Darren Logan, Sr. v. County of Los Angeles, et al. Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC 483585 No reportable action was taken. d. Cindy Orellana v. County of Los Angeles, et al. United States District Court Case No. CV 12-01944 No reportable action was taken. e. Shahram Salimitari v. County of Los Angeles Chatsworth Superior Court Case No. PC 051113

No reportable action was taken.

HOA.1041275.1 2

HOA.1041275.1 3

5. Report of actions taken in Closed Session.

The Contract Cities Liability Trust Fund Claims Board reconvened in open session and reported the actions taken in closed session as indicated under Agenda Items No. 3 and No. 4 above.

6. Approval of the minutes of the April 10, 2013, meeting of the Contract Cities Liability Trust Fund Claims Board.

Action Taken:

The Contract Cities Liability Trust Fund Claims Board approved the minutes.

Vote: Ayes: 7 -- Curtis Morris, Mark Alexander, Margaret Finlay, Michael Egan, Doug Prichard, Harold Hofmann and Sam Olivito

See Supporting Document

7. Items not on the posted agenda, to be referred to staff or placed on

the agenda for action at a further meeting of the Board, or matters requiring immediate action because of emergency situation or where the need to take immediate action came to the attention of the Board subsequent to the posting of the agenda.

No such matters were discussed.

8. Other Business. None 9. Adjournment.

CASE SUMMARY

INFtJRMATION ~3N PROPC7SED SETTLEMENT OF LITIGATION

CASE NAME Estate of Jonathan~~Cuevas v.. County of Los Rng~les, et al.

CASE NUMBER CV~~108297

COURT

QATE FIL.~D

COUNTY DEPARTMENT

PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AMQUNT

ATTC)RNEY.~QR PLAINTIFF

COUNTY COUNSEL ATTORNEY

NATURE 4F CASE

HOA.972828.1

United States District Gaunt°

Camptaint filed: O~ctaber 6, 2011

Claim: April 11, 2011

Sheriff's Department

$ ~ ~875,4Qq

James P. Segall-Gutierrez, Esq.Law Offices of James P. Segall-Gutisrrez

Jennifer A.D. Lehman

'his is a recommendation to setkisfor $87,000, inclusive ofattorneys' fees and costs, thelawsuit.filed by decedent JonathanCuevas's minor child, A.M., by hisGuardian Ad Litem, Mays MuriAo;and The Estate Hof Janathan~Cuevas, by his Executor MayraMurillo, alleging wrongful deathand civil rights violations.

Plaintiffs claim a Deputy shotMr. Cuevas without Just cause.The Deputy~cant~nds that theforce used was reasonable inresponse to Plaintiff s actions.However, in :fight of the potential

a

PA(D ATTORNEY FEES, ~TO DATE

PACD COSTS, TO DATE

HOA,972828,1

for high exposure and theuncertainties of~litigation, a full andfinal settlement of the case in theamount of $$75,p00 isrecommended.

$ 46,$17.42

$ 5,681.07 1

Case Name: v

Surinmary Gorrec~~v~ Ac~~Qn Plan

The tnb~nt oi` thfs farm is to assist depertmante in writing ~ conea~ve acUan pl~n•summary for att~~ht~enE

to the ~ettlament daauments developed fir the Board of Supervisors and/or the Coungr of i os Angeles

Claims Beard. The summary ~houkt be a speclflc ovenr~►w of the ci~lrns/~wsutts' ~ientJff~d'wnt oau$es

and connective aoHone (status„ time fame, and responsible party).. This summary dose nat tapioca the

Corrective Action Plan form. . if there is ~ quasNon related to ~~Ad~n~ality. piease aonault

County Caunsei.

pale of inoidenftevent: Sunday 4ch~ber 10, 2010, ~ppra~matety 12.23 a.m.

Brtefly provide a descripttanof the tna[dentlevent: ~ ~

Summary CamecBva Action Ptan No. 2Q13-018

On Sunday, October 10, 2g10, at approximately 12:28 a.m., ~: l os

Angates County depuq► sheriff was driving e stand~~d bleak and,whits

County-owned patrol vehicle north on ~.ong Beaoh~ Boulsvarci, nnr~h of

Josephine Strew Lynwood, when t~ saw severst men walking south in

the traffic lanes impeding tr~af~o. The deputy sheriff tnitlated a contact to.

warn the individuals:

VYhen the deputy sheriff cantao6ad the mar+, the deputy also .observed

~nnother man (decedent) an an adJa~~nt sidewalk. Tt~t man. removed a

handgun &otn his waistband and. bean running away from the.deputy

sheriff. .

'Chi depugr ~hedN directed the man to stop, but he quickly turned

around toward the deputy sheriff, causing .the deputy sheriff to be~ava

he was about to be shot. The deputy ~harlH' dtsd~arged his weapan~

~st~ktng the man.

The mats continued to run, but 6911 to the ground where the deputy

~heritf ~ppro~ahad him. ,'r'he deputy sharit~ directed the min to place his

hands (n clear vtew~ but t~e~ man disregarded tie depuEy sheriff s

instrucUans: The deputy sheriff dl~aharged his weapon, st~kinq the man

atn. ..~

1. Bdefy► describe the ~, eau a~j, of fhb olatmll~wsuit:

In their lawsuit, the ptaintlfFa (on behalf of tie estaate of Jonathan Cuevas) alleged a member of the 4os

Angeles County 3heri~'s pepartment is responsible for the wrcn~fut death n! tie decedent

2. Briny desasribe r~acammended~c~mecttve aa~fonsi.pnaluds oaoh corrective action, due dad, reaponsfbta party, and any disaipltnary actions

K appropdata)

Tha los Angels County 8heriffs~Dapartment had r8le~ranE {~Ifoies and proaedureatprataoals tn.effect

at the tlme oP fh~ Inclden~

Document version: 4A (danuary 2013) P~Qe 4 of 3

Coungr of l as Angeles .

Summaryr Cgrrecttve Action Plan

The i as Angeles County Sl~rtfCs D~aparEmer~t's t~atning cutr~ulum addresses the clroumst~nce9 which

occurred in the Incident

7'he lnaldent was tharuushty reviewed by r~presenta~ves them •the i os Angeles County 8hertff s

Deper~rtenrs Hamtolde~ tatemaf Af~a(re Bureau and. ultimately, tt~e Executive Fora .Ftevisw

CommtEtee, 'Chair review found that the farce used by the deputy sheriff` way reasonable neceseary~

and in compliance with Oapertment pnl~y. Consequentiy~ no pers~nnet-related adminlet~atitre action

was talon, and no cth~r carrecttve aoktan measures ar+a t~ec~ommended nor contemplated. "

3. Are the carrectivs actions addressing department~wida system Issues?

D Yes —`I"h~ carre~ttve ~cttans ~addres~ department widd.sysfem issues.

~ No — "t'he corrrr~ctive aeons are only appltcabte to the affected parties,

L.as Angeles Coun[y 8hetitPs Dep~rtmsnt

N8Crt8: (FtlsitManagemelrt(3aordtnatorj

Judy A. Gefiardt, AcBng Capt~tnRisk Management Bttt~aau

Sipnatur~: ~ ~7ate: ..

Name: (Depa~tmant Head)

~Ien Dr~govicfl~ pivislan Director.,~fministrattve and ̀I'r~ining Divtsinn

Signature:C1ate:

This ~ectton Intantianalty left blant~.

Doaum~ntverston: 4.Q (January ~Q93y Page 2 of ~

County of LogAngalas ~ .

SummaryG~~recttveAation Ptan

e

Dacument vereton: 4.0 (January 2013} ,. ~ Paps 8 oP 3.

CASE SUMMARY

INFORMATION ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF LITIGATION

CASE NAME

CASE NUMBER

COURT

DATE FILED

COUNTY DEPARTMENT

PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AMOUNT

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

COUNTY COUNSEL ATTORNEY

NATURE OF CASE

HOA.972125.1

M.L., a minor v. County of LosAngeles; E.P.; a minor v. Countyof Los Angeles; and A.L., a minorv. County of los Angeles

Superior -Court Case Nos.VC058338; VC058936; andVC058446

Los Angeles Superior Court

Complaint filed: March 22, 2011

Claim: October 29, 2010

Sheriff's Department

$ $311,500

Brian Dunn, Esq. ofThe Cochran FirmPeter Goldstein, Esq.Marc Grossman, Esq.

Jennifer A.D. Lehman

This is a recommendation to settlefor $311,500, the lawsuit filed byminors M.L., E.P., and A.L., andJanice Johnson, for the allegedwrongful death of their father andson Jerome Luckett. Plaintiffsallege civil rights violations andwrongful death causes of actionagainst two Deputy Sheriff. s.

The Deputies contend that theyacted reasonably_ and fired uponthe Decendent after he failed to

PAID ATTORNEY FEES, TO DATE

PAID COSTS, TO DATE

HOA.972125.1

follow commands to show hishands, and instead reached for hiswaistband. However, due to therisks and uncertainties of litigation,a full and final settlement of thecase in the amount of $311,500 isrecommended.

$ 102,509.87

$ 5,274.59

Case Name: M.L. a minorv. County of Los Ange{es

Summary Corrective Action Plan

The intent of this form is to assist departments in writing a corrective ac#ion plan summary for attachmentto the settlement documents developed for the Board of Supervisors andlor the County of Los AngelesClaims Board. The summary should be a specific overview of the claimsliawsuits' idenffied roof causesand corrective actions (status, time frame, and responsible party). This summary does not replace theCorrective Action Plan form. ~ If there Is a question related to confidentiality, please consultCounty Counsel

Date of incidenUevent: Wednesday, June 96, 2010; approximately 9:31 p.m.

Briefly provide a descriptionof the inc~denUevent M.L.. a minor v. County ofi Los Anaetes

Summary Corrective Acton Plan No. 2Q13-017

- On Wednesday, June 16, 2010, at approximately 9:31 p.m., two LosAngeles County deputy sheriffs, assigned to the Los Angeles CountySheriffs Department's Lakewood Station, received a radio call ofgunshots in an apartment complex

When the deputies arrived at the apartment complex, they were directedby the caller to the rear parking lot where the shooting suspects werebelieved to have fled. In the parking lot, the deputies contacted thedecedent artd another man. Both men were wearing clothing similar tothe clothing wom by the reported shooters}.

While one man readily complied with the deputy sheriffs instructions,the decedent acfed as if he was arming himself. in fear for his life, adeputy sheriff discharged his weapon one time and struck the decedentin the chest.

Briefly describe the root cause(si of the claim/lawsuit

In (heir lawsuit, the plaintiffs (fhe decedents three minor children and mother) alleged the decedentwas subjected to unreasonable force by a member of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.

2. Briefly describe recommended corrective actions:(include each corrective action, due date, ~sponsibte pa'►ty, and any disciplinary actions if appropriate)

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department had relevant policies and procedures/protocois in effectat the time of the incident

The Los Angeles County Sheriffs D,epartmenYs training curriculum addresses the circumstances whichoccurred in the incident. ~~

This incident was ti~oroughly reviewed by the members of the Los Angeles County SheriffsDepartments Executive Force Review Committee. Whife their review found that the force used by thedeputy sheriff was reasonable, necessary, and in compliance with Department policy, appropriateadministrative action was imposed upon two members of the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

Document version: 4.d (January 2013) Page 1 of 2

County of Los AngelesSummary Corrective Action Plan

3. Are the corrective actions addressing departrnent wide system issues?

D Yes —The corrective actions address department wide system issues.

~ No —The corrective actions are only applicable to the affected parties.

Los Angeles County Sheriffs Depafinent

Nai'11e: (Risk Management Coordinator)

Judy A. Gerhardt, Acting CaptainRisk Management Bureau

Signature: Qate:

'_7~fJ~,C.~

N8h18: (Department Head)

G(en Dragovich, Division DirectorAdministrative and Training Division

Signature: Date:

{~y~~ y~( ..•< • ~.r. ~ >fi' wi: < r?. y• ;x::). <'ti:. fl~i:y/~3" >x ' ~~;..; -. ~y:. ?~~.>.;t._;.li,-..f ;.ta: r,;:;>' ~::f`h ?~~'.:.v.Y~:

~1i~Y`p■ ~~w .~ ;.?!?~,5".,~, .; i., ..y •, a•,a<,~. nri: }.'nt a*:,

a!S:a'+~'`~'~;5:~'~~~o,~. Rill . 2?iP • ~r~>~~ ~} ~H:+~.;.:: - rY ' . ~,h.~. ♦~ ,a.5..... f?v~••st~Y ~'.•f~ienS'::. SS . y ~'Y~. ~~~:♦+nSy~iG.ry.3}, ~ +i. ?2 ~ { < • ~1 ~. 'N { ̀~t WF '•nS~'.•`

yb ' :tC.. "C

i.•C~,S"Y..~}:4. l• S Z ~.<~',~\ ~ Fbi ̂f.~.'

. ~~ ~'~ot'4: "•~~j• ~~'4).. ~ ~Y~.,.rti Y~~~1~~~:~yr(h~' ~yr~~~. r1 Z;, ~ ~`~`~0'3:.•• k:::v :} • A F• Z~:i:l 'y~. h

r~I; t .y{,l~i,'," ~ "'- - u~~ Sig` v+::tk.. '~ k'~"a; ~QF~'acy`y`+~>~$ .,.~3' F.

~`.5,v,~.y %}:^F' LY:../{;i'` .'~t~ 'po '. b̂ . ~pp ~,y,~~ ~c~~!p <> '3 y;'"q. 2E. •.. C::..: SJ,h :Z• ~~ \ ~ ~ :Za ~•. •}., .?~ ~j ~?~t f 31.E ~ <~lt. ~t>.Y2~:~

~(~ ~"',~~.j EiC`li.~.~ 'i:,.; c~ ~.`;.k.~.. ~~t,'''~i:;: C~~w,.3>`,=~.,,..3~t~': ~,.o, i:~'~t~a'it5;,~r.,+~}v, .,.~~5.,{v+l,, y~ ~a,.. .,{+- } ( r ~ 'v} . : ~YS.} ~"~>j:'..: ̀2~>~S? ~.,tiF~PY) ~ dfi. v ~~..:.7;:~ •btho•T o'r ~ :§;: ,J•M1f

' °`.. ~.',~~' . . 3.~,-~` ..:s =.i r• a. ..e'' . a ::y;'~', ,, ~Qa~'.•:b L<. •":..y'~.r•>...Sr~t.,,~:. ~.,k.,: 3'..,..:C ~.CV .~~ 'i~~t1y~~~~.:r%~.~'`~ ...v#'.~`.'.:. •. 4.{'.~ii.,~'̂ N.uv3:,.7, .:t. ~::

~'#;Y'o~\•.'A,}Y.'s:F: '+~.,~' .iiv 'Z`•~~'' . ~ yy~~.: ~~$ Yd. Y:. ~.v... , 4 .,.y;~y.~

<~,'h`yCt,~i~.`cq:'.`:YO .?v. }#.

>.» zk ~. •:, :~i':: ~ z ~#.'~~.,r"~`k .~€ <... ̀?'~~:~5,?. <•~ '°,~X r. <.,~~i~'%~:~~~: ..i.. ,7>.::-: x;,<z>:Rr:,:>:<.r.:... >as;z~;;#`:,. < yz3°t`i~. dt.. o. ~)4~°~.,`t~;c,.> ?a~:. 's f y;. € i{. ~,L~",~' .-~f'. ,,~ '' ..rr3;?i? ski ~. ~:vYR%~..5~,....~.s...yL,•a •3.:.. d:

.tr,:'•}<ffi:~i.a R~S,. $~2gT: M., r >., ..=i~~ Jc° .~i iw > ~ +̀`~'~' ~ v.. E:>. ##2' ~. ~ +.

rwr:Y.~.. ~. ~~~niF; ~i~

'il'•, 4^y, A"i.~ •tt4 .r %~~ ~,~%.Ye S`. ~ v' s,y :'N ~~1".' ~ ;?`f.-'^`':".th`w':e; y~ .. ~,2 ••~ ,5< ~. ~~:i.

'ti . ~ ~ ay •. a> 4~~~;ifY ~ ~?' u,~ S:I~.+A`. .s., cc t ;E., .~, ft;`'.n,'-~'sn~:.~;:``.~'✓3^'`,ss~.'~zi,`~"_~ :.;.m::.:£ 'fyiY'~ ^c k` .. ~ . ~ . ~

~~~JXµ.•,~+~>l%h'£;

f{'q: ,;yA;..~ff'i. ~:wn,7isY: ~«:~ ;:~.'~::~ •r ~i~~. ~ ~P ~ • ~- ' ,+ - :•: y • <: u zee-~.c. ~:~ .,.,v~'..~.~.;z:. •,rt:,sz, „>~.~k~'~'.. ~.>3 >.3.,..

;c .zL`.' y,.U~t ' cr..c; ., '.b ~ ?~:,,, k,7'°,. r'$v n-c• ,' • ~ fr~: ~,;;•5.+5Y,t;.,~.hr. t~'2's><a'),:~'r.'S.F?'C:y~yr::~«k ;.G•}.%::i; .'-Y; fi::p+r

}.~.>~..•n,~~r.~ u f 'Yr':f:5i~~c. r~ ~ ~yy~3,• ~"~. < y~'A. .3.: <. .,: Sts?..-:.y#, ::.....~"::S;'~ ~..st.; :a'~.;v` t•,<~; r:~ s: '~ .:`)=~ : v7n:}~in..<:k:°:;xa~:s.~:x:~i`.i-•v'' . ., Q.. ; ~''.::+3.6i. f :2 ~.~: try. ~ryW$e~it~6~~ }: ~¢:.'kv..~":^t..i Y6~Y: i.•Kst.':i~:i?~ ;.J ~..>:.,,. ..~..:,.s~ .z~.x. :ti~:n:.;:S.•u•>"' r~:i'";".'•:..~'?3jS:.;~';`!;.~y., ,.,~w~t,.a 3 . ors.: x~x.' . z £•~. `+' w '&~. ..=g. ?2„": r s..

-%~~~:as~:rf3:?'~.cti~..~'t~sr.>~s; ~~.s4•r>g ~~.e•}.c•~ %a~3•Sc ;~z>y;;s.;LSr:,w, ?z?.zr ~r'x.?.csN~=.~. .c3>x:~3~.,a,,.,,,.,,,>.;:.,,,:>.<o;.~?,..~. ~a: r <!;•. #,•'.::c.,.:,;~~:

Nal11e: (Risk Management InspecEor GeneraQ

~~ ~~T"~,-✓ ~r~✓oSignature: ~ Date:

~--

~/s /~

Document ve~sian: 4.0 (January 2013) ~ Page 2 of 2

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELESCONTRACT CITIES LIABILITY TRUST FUND

CLAIMS BOARD

MINUTES OF MEETING

April 10, 2013

Agenda Item No.: S

1. Call to Ordcr

This meeting of the County of Los Angeles Contract Cities Liability

Tryst Fund Claims Boaxd was called to order by Curtis Morris, at 11:13 a.m.

The meeting was held in the City of Norwalk, Community Meeting:Center,

Multipurpose Room, 13200 Clarkdale Avenue, Norwalk, CA 9Q650

Present at the meeting were Claims Board Members: Curtis Morris,

Chair, San Dimas, Region III; Mark Alexander, La Canada Flintridge, Region I;

Margaret Finlay, Duarte, Region I; Michael Egan, Norwalk, Region III; Doug

Prichard, Rolling Hills Estates, Region II; Harold Hofinann, Lawndale, Region II;

Sam 4livito, Executive Director, California Contract Cities Association;

~4lternates: Darrell George, Duarte, Region I; David Spence, La Canada

Flingridge, Region I; Cheri Kelley, Norwalk, Region III; County of Los Angeles

Staff: Roger H. Granbo, Assistant County Counsel; Ernie Romo, Risk

1Vlanagement, Chief Executive Office; Ronald Williams, Civil Litigation Unit,

Los Angeles Shexiff s Department; Chris Deacon, Civil Litigation Unit, Los

Angeles County Sheriffs Department; James Lopez, Chief, Los Angeles Sheriffs

Deparhnent; Michael DeMattei, Milliman; Third Party Administrator for the

County of Los Angeles: Sylvia Hernandez, Claims, Carl Warren ~& Company;

California JPIA: Jonathan.Shull, Chief executive Officer; Paul Zeglovitch,

Liability Program Manager, Jennifer Fullerton, Secretary.

2. Public Comment

Members of the public were provided the opportunity to address

the Contract Cities Liability Trust Fund Claims Board on items of interest

that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Claims Board. No

members of the public addressed the Board.

At 11:13 a.m., the Chair adjourned tha County of Las Angeles

Contract Cities Liability Trust Fund Claims Board into. Closed Session,

3. Conference with Legal Counsel -Existing Litigation

(Subdivision (a) of Government Code. Section 54956.9)

There were ria settlement proposals fox this meeting.

HOA,974954.1

PAGE 2

4. Confearence with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation

(Subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 54956.9)

a. William F. v. Caunty of Zos Aneeles, et al.

Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC437875

b. M.L, bX Brandi Blackburca v. Count~of Los An e~lesLet a1.

Norwalk Superior Court Case No. VCOS8338

c. Isabel "Israel." Pulido v. Cc~unt;~of Los Angeles, et a1.

Santa. Monica Superior Court Case Na. SC115321

d. Shahram Salimitaxi v. County of Los Angeles

Chatsworth Superior Courk Case No. PCO51113

e. Katrina'~aylor v. County of Las Angeles

Norwalk Superior Cozrrt Case No. VC058739

The meeting was reconvened into public session at 11:21 a.m. No

action was taken in Closed Session which required a public report

pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1.

5. Approval of the Minutes for March 13, 2013 meeting of the Contract

Cities Liability Trust Fund Claims Board.

The Minutes for the meting of March-13, 2013, were approved.

6. Items Not an the Posted Agenda, to be Referred to Staff or Placed on the

Agenda for Action at a Further Meeting of the Contract Cities Liability

Trust Fund Claims Board, or Matters Requiring Immediate Action Because

of Emergency Situation or Where the Necd to Take Immediate Action Came

to the Attention of the Board Subsequent to the Posting of the Agenda

One case presented:• Derrick Simpson v. County of Los Angeles, et al.

Campton Superior Court Case No. TCO2S257

HOA.974954,1

PAGE 3

7. Other Business

I~jone

8. Adjournment

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:21 a.m.

COUNTY OF LOS .ANCrELESCONTRACT CITIES LIABILITYTRUST FUND CLAIMS BOARD.

SANDRA C.

HOA.974954.1