64
Before Hearing Commissioners at Christchurch under: the Resource Management Act 1991 in the matter of: applications CRC172455, CRC172522, CRC172456, and CRC172523 to undertake channel deepening dredging and maintenance dredging in Lyttelton Harbour and in the matter of: Lyttelton Port Company Limited Applicant Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical evidence) Dated: 28 March 2017 REFERENCE: JM Appleyard ([email protected]) ML Nicol ([email protected])

Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Before Hearing Commissioners

at Christchurch

under:

the Resource Management Act 1991

in the matter of: applications CRC172455, CRC172522, CRC172456, and

CRC172523 to undertake channel deepening dredging

and maintenance dredging in Lyttelton Harbour

and

in the matter of: Lyttelton Port Company Limited

Applicant

Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical evidence)

Dated: 28 March 2017

REFERENCE: JM Appleyard ([email protected])

ML Nicol ([email protected])

Page 2: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

1

100081355/947213.3

EVIDENCE OF DR MICHAEL PAGE

INTRODUCTION

1 My name is Dr Michael Page.

2 I possess the tertiary-level qualifications of Bachelor of Science

(Applied Geology, First Class Honours), conferred by Curtin

University of Technology, and Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), conferred

by James Cook University. My PhD research topic was concerned

with the marine geology and recent geological evolution of the

north-east Australian continental margin, encompassing aspects of

sediment transport and deposition on the continental shelf and slope

offshore Queensland.

3 I am a Senior Engineering Geologist employed by Advisian, a

wholly-owned subsidiary of WorleyParsons Ltd (WorleyParsons).

WorleyParsons is an engineering company that provides services

globally, including in Australia and New Zealand, to the energy,

resources, complex process industries and infrastructure sectors.

Advisian is a global consulting company and includes Technical

Consulting specialists in engineering and scientific disciplines.

4 I have over 12 years’ experience as an engineering geologist with

WorleyParsons and Advisian and a further 6 years’ combined

industry and research experience performing geological

investigations. My experience as an engineering geologist includes

undertaking geotechnical investigations for projects located in

nearshore marine and coastal zones and throughout continental

shelf and slope environments, including numerous studies for

assessment of dredging and port development projects.

5 I co-authored a report entitled “LPC Dredging Support, Geotechnical

Site Investigation Factual Report (Preliminary)” reference number

301311-09433-GT-REP-0001 RevA1, for Lyttelton Port Company

Limited (LPC) in relation to its application for resource consents to

undertake channel deepening dredging and maintenance dredging in

Lyttelton Harbour (Applications). Together, the Applications are to

undertake works known as the Channel Deepening Project (CDP).

SCOPE OF EVIDENCE

6 My Report covered:

6.1 Factual information from the investigation, comprising:

(a) Borehole logs, including descriptions of soil samples

and the results of in-situ testing by downhole shear-

vane and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) for

assessment of soil strength;

Page 3: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

2

100081355/947213.3

(b) Cone Penetration Test with pore pressure CPTu results,

including the results of in-situ pore-water dissipation

testing, for assessment of soil strength, permeability

and indicative composition; and

(c) Geotechnical laboratory test results, for assessment of

the physical and chemical properties of the soils and

the engineering properties of the soils.

7 In preparing this evidence I have reviewed a number of background

and relevant adjacent site investigation and characterisation

reports. These included:

7.1 Coffey Geotechnics Pty Ltd, ‘Proposed Deepening and

Extension of Lyttelton Port Approach Channel, Report of A13

Capital Dredge Geophysical Investigation’ ref:

GEOPLCOV00220AC-AC, July 2016;

7.2 Coffey Geotechnics Pty Ltd, ‘Te Awaparahi Bay – Marine

Geophysical Survey, Land Reclamation at Te Awaparahi Bay –

Stage 1, Marine Geophysical Survey’, ref:

GEOPLCOV00220AA-AB, September 2015;

7.3 OCEL Consultants NZ, ‘Geotechnical Investigation for the

Dredging Required to Extend and Deepen the Lyttelton

Navigation Channel – Preliminary Results Summary’, ref:

030901, January 2016;

7.4 OCEL Consultants NZ, ‘Capital Dredging Geotechnical

Investigation Report’, ref: 030901, January 2016;

7.5 OCEL Consultants NZ, ‘Deepening and Extension of the

Navigation Channel, Capital and Maintenance Dredging

Impact on the Physical Environment’, ref: 030901, December

2009;

7.6 OCEL Consultants NZ, ‘Geotechnical Investigation of the Hard

Layer in the Lyttelton Harbour Navigation Channel’, ref:

040502, September 2006;

7.7 Southern Geophysical Ltd, ‘Geophysical Investigation:

Downhole Shear-wave Velocity Survey, Lyttelton Port,

Lyttelton’, ref: SGL Job 1205, December 2015; and

7.8 Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences,”1:250,000

Geological Map, Christchurch”, 2008.

8 Although this is not an Environment Court hearing, I note that in

preparing my evidence I have reviewed the code of conduct for

Page 4: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

3

100081355/947213.3

expert witnesses contained in part 7 of the Environment Court

Practice Note 2014. I have complied with it in preparing my

evidence. I confirm that the issues addressed in this statement of

evidence are within my area of expertise. I have not omitted to

consider material facts known to me that might alter or detract from

the opinions expressed.

SUMMARY OF REPORT

Work undertaken

9 A marine geotechnical site investigation, scoped and specified by

WorleyParsons, was undertaken in Lyttelton Harbour to assess the

engineering geological conditions within the areas of proposed

future dredging. The primary site investigation methods comprised

CPTu’s and boreholes, which were performed with conventional

borehole drilling and CPT equipment mounted on a self-elevating /

jack-up barge.

10 The geotechnical site investigation was performed in three separate

phases scheduled around logistical and operational constraints. The

first phase was performed between 2 October and 4 November

2016. The second phase was performed between 22 November and

6 December 2016 and the third phase was performed between 17

and 27 February 2017.

11 The site investigation scope comprised ‘paired’ CPTu’s and boreholes

at 20 test locations positioned throughout the areas of proposed

future dredging in Lyttelton Harbour, including areas of proposed

deepening and widening of the existing channel and along the

alignment of the proposed channel extension (Figure 1,

Attachment 1). The CPTu’s and boreholes were specified with a

nominal target depth of -20 m Chart Datum (mCD), therefore

extending several meters below the future target depth of dredging

and allowing for characterisation of the dredge materials including

over-dredge within normal dredging tolerances.

12 CPTu’s were performed in general accordance with ASTM D5778-12

“Standard Test Method for Electric Friction Cone and Piezocone

Penetration Testing of Soils”. Specification of intervals and

durations for in-situ dissipation testing was performed on-board the

jack-up barge by an experienced Engineering Geologist from

WorleyParsons / Advisian.

13 Specification of sampling intervals, in-situ testing intervals and

geotechnical logging of the boreholes was carried out on-board the

jack-up barge by an experienced Engineering Geologist from

WorleyParsons / Advisian. Logging was performed in general

accordance with:

Page 5: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

4

100081355/947213.3

13.1 Australian Standard (AS) 1726-1993 “Geotechnical site

investigations”; and

13.2 New Zealand Geotechnical Society (NZGS) “Field Description

of Soil and Rock, Guideline for the Field Classification and

Description of Soil and Rock for Engineering Purposes”,

December 2005.

14 Subsequent to the site-based component of the investigation,

geotechnical laboratory testing was performed on selected soil

samples recovered from the boreholes. Samples were transported

to Perth, Australia where a laboratory testing programme

appropriate for assessment of dredging conditions was undertaken.

Specification of test types and intervals was scheduled by an

experienced Engineering Geologist from WorleyParsons / Advisian.

Individual tests were undertaken in accordance with relevant

Australian/New Zealand or international standards, where

applicable.

The results

15 The results of the investigation will be reported in a factual report

entitled “LPC Dredging Support, Geotechnical Site Investigation

Factual Report (Final)” reference number 301311-09433-GT-REP-

0001. At the time of preparation of this statement this report has

been issued in a ‘Preliminary’ form only, which was compiled

following completion of the second phase of the site investigation.

The Final report will be issued pursuant to incorporation of the

results of the third (and final) phase of the site investigation,

including receipt of all remaining laboratory testing data which is

currently pending completion by the testing laboratory.

16 In summary, the result of investigations so far have identified the

following soil conditions:

16.1 The marine subsurface geological profile within the depth of

the proposed future dredging is dominated by a sequence of

mostly medium to high plasticity Clayey Silts and Silty Clays

(‘loess’ soils), with a subordinate quantity of Sandy Silts.

These soils are predominantly very soft at the seabed and in

the shallow subsurface, grading to soft over the majority of

the proposed dredge depth, equating to an undrained shear

strength of less than 25 kPa. In some locations the soil

grades to firm at depths approaching the limit of proposed

future dredging, reaching a maximum undrained shear

strength of 33 kPa.

16.2 No evidence of cemented materials, rock, or ‘hard layers’ was

identified within the depth of proposed dredging during the

site investigation or subsequent laboratory testing.

Page 6: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

5

100081355/947213.3

16.3 ‘Sandy’ soils of relatively high strength in comparison to the

predominant ‘loess’ soils where identified at all locations

investigated. The ‘sandy’ soils occur in a laterally continuous

horizon, but in all locations investigated were encountered at

depths below the proposed dredge levels.

16.4 Summary results of the complete set of CPTu data for all

three phases of the site investigation are included as

Attachment 2.

CONCLUSION

17 The geotechnical site investigation activities completed in this study

have expanded on the existing data sets to provide a more complete

coverage and understanding of the materials which may be

encountered during the future dredging operations.

18 Geotechnical investigations identified a profile of low strength clayey

and silty soils, which are expected to be suitable for dredging with

conventional dredging equipment.

Dated: 28 March 2017

Dr Michael Page

Page 7: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

6

100081355/947213.3

ATTACHMENT 1 – FIGURE 1 SHOWING BOREHOLE LOCATIONS

Page 8: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

CPT/BH04-2N CPT/BH06-8S

Current extent

of channel

CPT/BH05-5S CPT/BH02-0N

BH-01-0C(a) CPT/BH01-0C

CPT/BH02-7S

LOCALITY PLAN SCALE 1:20000

LEGEND

CPT/BH08-8C

-10

Paired CPT / Borehole location and number

Existing channel, berth pocket and turning basin to be deepened

Existing channel, berth pocket and turning basin to be widened

Proposed channel extension

Major contour (mCD) - 5m intervals

Minor contour - 1m intervals

Front leading light (KP 0)

2.0 Kilometre Post (KP)

KEY PLAN NTS

Purau Bay Diamond Harbour

Pile Bay

Ripapa

Island

Camp Bay

CTP/BH00-7S CTP-7S(a)

CPT/BH01-5S CPT/BH00-3C

Little Port

Cooper

CPT/BH00-4N CPT/BH04-7S

CPT/BH03-8S

Adderley Head

CPT/BH01-5N

Baleine Point CPT/BH06-3N

BH07-1N(a)

CPT/BH07-1N

CPT/BH07-8C

Livingstone

Bay Gollans

Bay

Breeze Bay

CPT/BH08-8C

Mechanics

Bay

CPT/BH09-8C Godley

Head

CPT/BH11-2C

Boulder

Bay

CPT/BH12-4C

Port Levy

TASMAN

SEA

Wellington

Westport

Kaikoura

PACIFIC

OCEAN

Christchurch

PROJECT

AREA

Page 9: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

7

Attachment 2 – Final CPTu test results

100081355/947213.3

Page 10: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST (CPT) REPORT

Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Channel Dredging

Lyttelton Port of Christchurch,

Christchurch

Printed: 02/03/2017

Page 11: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu00-3C

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 27.37

Elevation (m): 6.00

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797435.80

East (m): 399241.80

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Clays: clay to silty clay

17

18

Dissipation Test

18.38 m

1839 seconds 19

20

21 Silt mixtures: clayey silt &

silty clay

22

23

24

25

26

27

EOH: 27.37m 28

29

30

Operator: S. Cardona

Date: 06/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 14.55

Water Level: 3.50

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.418

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0356

Final: 0.3886

Final: 0.0361

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: 6.616 Final: 5.996 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 14.10m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

27.37

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 12: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu00-4N

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.35

Elevation (m): 5.90

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797806.50

East (m): 399278.60

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Clays: clay to silty clay 15

16

17

18

Dissipation Test

18.35 m

2895 seconds 19

20

21

22

Silt mixtures: clayey silt & 23 silty clay

24

25

26

EOH: 26.35m 27

28

29

30

Operator: M. MacDonald

Date: 19/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 12.80

Water Level: 5.50

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3244

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0026

Final: 0.3229

Final: 0.0022

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -9.432 Final: -5.104 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 12.80m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.35

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 13: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu00-7S

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.39

Elevation (m): 5.90

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797234.90

East (m): 399673.70

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Clay - organic soil 14

15

16 Clay - organic soil

17

18

19

Dissipation Test

20.32 m

1658 seconds

20

21

Clay - organic soil

22

23

24

25

26

EOH: 26.39m 27

28

29

30

Operator: M. MacDonald

Date: 08/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 11.40

Water Level: 3.60

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.4415

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0366

Final: 0.7977

Final: 0.0369

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: 85.101 Final: 14.91 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Effective Refusal

Sea floor: 11.00m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.39

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 14: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu00-7S A

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.41

Elevation (m): 5.80

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797239.40

East (m): 399676.40

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12 Clays: clay to silty clay

13

14

Dissipation Test

15.39 m

3581 seconds

15

16 Clays: clay to silty clay

17

18

19

20

21

Dissipation Test

22.05 m

3515 seconds

22

Silt mixtures: clayey silt & 23

silty clay

24 Silt mixtures: clayey silt & silty clay

25

26

EOH: 26.41m 27

28

29

30

Operator: M. MacDonald

Date: 03/11/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 11.30

Water Level: 3.70

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.2747

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: -0.0015

Final: 0.2661

Final: -0.0019

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -16.398 Final: -9.713 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth

Sea floor: 11.30m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.41

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 15: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu00-7S rev

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.39

Elevation (m): 5.90

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797234.90

East (m): 399673.70

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Clay - organic soil 14

15

16 Clay - organic soil

17

18

19

Dissipation Test

20.32 m

1658 seconds

20

21

Clay - organic soil

22

23

24

25

26

EOH: 26.39m 27

28

29

30

Operator: M. MacDonald

Date: 08/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 11.40

Water Level: 3.60

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.4415

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0366

Final: 0.7977

Final: 0.0369

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: 85.101 Final: 14.91 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Effective Refusal

Sea floor: 11.00m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.39

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 16: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu00-7S rev 2

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.39

Elevation (m): 5.90

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797234.90

East (m): 399673.70

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Clays: clay to silty clay 14

15

16

17

18

19

Dissipation Test

20.32 m

1658 seconds

20

Silt mixtures: clayey silt &

21 silty clay

22 Silt mixtures: clayey silt & silty clay

23

24

25

26

EOH: 26.39m 27

28

29

30

Operator: M. MacDonald

Date: 08/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 11.40

Water Level: 3.60

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.4415

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0366

Final: 0.7977

Final: 0.0369

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: 85.101 Final: 14.91 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Effective Refusal

Sea floor: 11.00m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.39

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 17: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu01-0C

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 25.42

Elevation (m): 4.60

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797550.00

East (m): 399931.00

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Dissipation Test

22.41 m

3623 seconds 23

24

25

EOH: 25.42m 26

27

28

29

30

Operator: S. Cardona

Date: 05/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 19.00

Water Level: 2.10

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3753

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0387

Final: 0.401

Final: 0.0356

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: 5.661 Final: 6.554 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 18.50m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

25.42

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 18: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu01-5N

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.32

Elevation (m): 5.50

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797877.50

East (m): 400385.30

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18 Clays: clay to silty clay

Dissipation Test

19.31 m

1988 seconds

19

Clays: clay to silty clay 20

21

22

23

Silt mixtures: clayey silt & 24 silty clay

25

26

EOH: 26.32m 27

28

29

30

Operator: M. MacDonald

Date: 18/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 17.10

Water Level: 4.20

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3363

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0019

Final: 0.3258

Final: 0.0018

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -6.733 Final: -5.082 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 17.10m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.32

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 19: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu01-5S

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.39

Elevation (m): 5.90

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797352.40

East (m): 400467.30

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Dissipation Test

15.40 m

1835 seconds

15

16 Clays: clay to silty clay

17

18

19

20

21

Dissipation Test

21.35 m

2607 seconds 22

23

24

25

26

EOH: 26.39m 27

28

29

30

Operator: S. Cardona

Date: 12/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 160925T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 12.50

Water Level: 5.00

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-15 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: -0.1585

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0021

Final: -0.1891

Final: 0.0012

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: 4.87 Final: 6.575 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth

Sea floor: 12.50m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.39

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 20: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu02-0N

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.29

Elevation (m): 6.10

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797391.00

East (m): 400890.00

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15 Clays: clay to silty clay

Dissipation Test 16

16.32 m

2423 seconds 17

18

19

20

21

Dissipation Test

21.33 m

1549 seconds 22

23

Silt mixtures: clayey silt &

24 silty clay

25

26

EOH: 26.29m 27

28

29

30

Operator: M. MacDonald

Date: 15/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 13.00

Water Level: 4.20

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.332

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0014

Final: 0.3054

Final: 0.0012

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -18.224 Final: -0.668 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 13.50m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.29

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 21: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu02-7S

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.37

Elevation (m): 5.80

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797674.90

East (m): 401621.00

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Clays: clay to silty clay 16

17 Clays: clay to silty clay

18

19

Dissipation Test

19.40 m

1715 seconds 20

21

Silt mixtures: clayey silt & 22 silty clay

23

Silt mixtures: clayey silt & 24 silty clay

25

26

EOH: 26.37m 27

28

29

30

Operator: S. Cardona

Date: 13/10/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 160925T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 13.20

Water Level: 3.50

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-15 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: -0.1946

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0037

Final: -0.1839

Final: 0.0013

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: 1.467 Final: 6.607 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth

Sea floor: 13.20m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.37

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 22: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu03-8S

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.14

Elevation (m): 5.00

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797827.60

East (m): 402612.20

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Clays: clay to silty clay 14

15

Clays: clay to silty clay 16

17

Dissipation Test

17.73 m 18 1807 seconds

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

EOH: 26.14m

27

28

29

30

Operator: R. Wyllie

Date: 23/11/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 13.20

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3883

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0044

Final: 0.3784

Final: 0.0023

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -5.672 Final: -3.414 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Effective Refusal Sea floor: 13.20m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.14

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 23: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu04-2N

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.35

Elevation (m): 5.50

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 798196.30

East (m): 403075.50

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

Dissipation Test

19.74 m

2289 seconds

20

Clays: clay to silty clay

21

22

23

24

25

26

EOH: 26.35m 27

28

29

30

Operator: R. Wyllie

Date: 26/11/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 16.00

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.4021

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0035

Final: 0.4099

Final: 0.0024

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -8.42 Final: -6.795 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth

Sea floor: 16.00m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.35

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 24: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu04-7S

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 27.71

Elevation (m): 6.00

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 797997.70

East (m): 403598.60

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Dissipation Test

20.71 m

1916 seconds

22

23

24

Dissipation Test

24.46 m

3978 seconds 25

26

27

EOH: 27.71m 28

29

30

Operator: R. Wyllie Date: 25/11/2016

31

Effective Refusal Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 16.30

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.4253

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0028

Final: 0.4072

Final: 0.0023

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -3.319 Final: -4.648 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth

Sea floor: 16.30m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

27.71

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

21

Page 25: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu05-5S

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 28.56

Elevation (m): 5.50

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 798122.00

East (m): 404391.80

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Clays: clay to silty clay 18

19

Dissipation Test

19.75 m 20 1800 seconds

21

22

23

24

25 Silt mixtures: clayey silt &

silty clay 26

27

28

EOH: 28.56m 29

30

Operator: R. Wyllie Date: 23/11/2016

31

Effective Refusal Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 16.93

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3945

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0029

Final: 0.3737

Final: 0.0021

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -10.681 Final: -5.03 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth

Sea floor: 16.93m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

28.56

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 26: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu06-3N

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 30.68

Elevation (m): 6.30

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 798557.30

East (m): 405131.90

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Dissipation Test

20.70 m

1821 seconds

19

Clays: clay to silty clay

20

21

22

Dissipation Test

23.58 m

1879 seconds

23

24

25

Silt mixtures: clayey silt &

silty clay 26

27

Silt mixtures: clayey silt &

28 silty clay

29 Silt mixtures: clayey silt &

silty clay 30

EOH: 30.68m

Operator: M. MacDonald

Date: 29/11/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 18.20

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.449

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0049

Final: 0.447

Final: 0.0036

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -4.394 Final: -4.541 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 18.20m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

30.68

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 27: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu06-8S

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 25.73

Elevation (m): 5.00

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 798336.00

East (m): 405682.10

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Dissipation Test

18.20 m

1416 seconds

18 Clays: clay to silty clay

19

20

21

Dissipation Test

21.74 m 22 2072 seconds

23

EOH: 25.73m

24

Silt mixtures: clayey silt & 25

silty clay

26

27

28

29

30

Operator: M. MacDonald

Date: 30/11/2016

31

Effective Refusal

Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 17.00

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.4544

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0056

Final: 0.4453

Final: 0.006

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -2.545 Final: -1.835 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 17.00m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

25.73

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 28: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu07-1N

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.70

Elevation (m): 6.00

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 798732.10

East (m): 405854.80

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Dissipation Test

22.23 m

1803 seconds

22

23 Silt mixtures: clayey silt &

silty clay

24

25

26

EOH: 26.7m 27

28

29

30

Operator: R. Wyllie Date: 16/02/2017

31

Effective Refusal Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 18.00

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.8196

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.023

Final: 0.8052

Final: 0.021

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: 6.804 Final: 8.26 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth

Sea floor: 18.00m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.70

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 29: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu07-8C

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 23.76

Elevation (m): 2.90

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 798978.00

East (m): 406527.00

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Clays: clay to silty clay

18

19

Clays: clay to silty clay

20

21

22

23

EOH: 23.76m 24

25

26

27

28

29

30

Operator: R. Wyllie Date: 22/11/2016

31

Effective Refusal Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 15.70

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3939

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0028

Final: 0.3953

Final: 0.0023

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: 16.14 Final: 19.448 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 15.70m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

23.76

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 30: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu08-8C

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 27.72

Elevation (m): 6.80

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 799448.70

East (m): 407403.70

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22 Clays: clay to silty clay

23

Dissipation Test 24 24.11 m

1803 seconds

25

26

27

EOH: 27.72m 28

29

30

Operator: R. Wyllie Date: 22/02/2017

31

Effective Refusal Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 20.65

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.1132

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0324

Final: 1.1356

Final: 0.0275

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -4.029 Final: -2.698 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 20.65m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

27.72

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 31: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu09-8C

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.71

Elevation (m): 6.50

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 799945.30

East (m): 408300.50

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23 Clays: clay to silty clay

24

Dissipation Test 24.54 m

2915 seconds 25

26

EOH: 26.71m 27

28

29

30

Operator: M. MacDonald Date: 23/02/2017

31

Effective Refusal Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 21.30

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.2151

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0359

Final: 1.3598

Final: 0.0265

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -4.247 Final: -5.6295 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 21.30m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.71

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 32: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu11-2C

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.73

Elevation (m): 5.50

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 800603.90

East (m): 409506.60

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Dissipation Test

24.97 m

1800 seconds

26

EOH: 26.73m 27

28

29

30

Operator: R. Wyllie Date: 25/02/2017

31

Effective Refusal Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 21.50

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.2399

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0358

Final: 1.2249

Final: 0.0348

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -2.424 Final: -2.815 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 21.60m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.73

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

25

Page 33: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CONE PENETRATION TEST Job:

CPT No.:

16397

CPTu12-4C

Name: Channel Dredging Client: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Location: Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, Christchurch

RAW DATA

Hole Depth (m): 26.72

Elevation (m): 5.40

Datum: Chart Datum

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

(NON-NORMALISED)

North (m): 801193.80

East (m): 410577.00

Grid: NZMG

ESTIMATED PARAMETERS

Tip

Resistance

(MPa)

Friction

Ratio

(%)

Pore

Pressure

(kPa)

Inclination

(Degrees)

SBT

SBT Description

(filtered)

Dr

(%)

Su

(kPa)

N60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

EOH: 26.72m 27

28

29

30

Operator: R. Wyllie Date: 26/02/2017

31

Effective Refusal Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) - Robertson et al. 1986

Rig: Hanjin D&B-8D - track

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Predrill: 22.50

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

0 Undefined

1 Sensitive fine-

grained

Sand mixtures: silty 5

sand to sandy silt 6

Sands: clean sands to silty sands

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10 Other: 2 Clay - organic soil Dense sand to

7 gravelly sand

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.3215

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0365

Final: 1.4126

Final: 0.0328

Target Depth:

3 Clays: clay to silty

clay Silt mixtures: clayey

Stiff sand to clayey 8

sand

Pore Pressure (KPa) Initial: -0.751 Final: -1.109 4 silt & silty clay 9 Stiff fine-grained

Notes & Limitations

Data shown on this report has been assessed to provide a basic interpretation in terms of Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) and various

geotechnical soil and design parameters using methods published in P. K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal (2010), Guide to Cone Penetration

Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Edition. The interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use, and should be

carefully reviewed by the user. Both McMillan Drilling Ltd & Geroc Solutions Ltd do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of

any of the geotechnical soil and design parameters shown and does not assume any liability for any use of the results in any design or

review. The user should be fully aware of the techniques and limitations of any method used to derive data shown in this report.

Remarks

Target Depth Sea floor: 22.50m

Hole Depth (m):

Sheet 1 of 1

26.72

Pre

dri

ll

10

20

30

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

200

400

600

800

5

10

15

Sc

ale

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

20

40

60

80

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

20

30

40

Page 34: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

TEST DETAIL

Sounding: 70

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Date: 08/10/2016

Predrill: 11.40

Water Level: 3.60

Collapse:

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.4415

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0366

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: 85.101

Final: 0.7977

Final: 0.0369

Final: 14.91 Target Depth:

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

PointID:

Sounding:

CPTu00-3C

1

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: S. Cardona

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.418

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0356

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: 6.616

CPTu00-4N

40

Date: 06/10/2016

Predrill: 14.55

Water Level: 3.50

Collapse:

Final: 0.3886

Final: 0.0361

Final: 5.996

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3244

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0026

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -9.432

CPTu00-7S

70

Date: 19/10/2016

Predrill: 12.80

Water Level: 5.50

Collapse:

Final: 0.3229

Final: 0.0022

Final: -5.104

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.4415

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0366

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: 85.101

CPTu00-7S A

17

Date: 08/10/2016

Predrill: 11.40

Water Level: 3.60

Collapse:

Final: 0.7977

Final: 0.0369

Final: 14.91

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.2747

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: -0.0015

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -16.398

Date: 03/11/2016

Predrill: 11.30

Water Level: 3.70

Collapse:

Final: 0.2661

Final: -0.0019

Final: -9.713

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID: CPTu00-7S rev

Page 35: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

TEST DETAIL

Sounding: 2

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Date: 15/10/2016

Predrill: 13.00

Water Level: 4.20

Collapse:

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.332

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0014

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -18.224

Final: 0.3054

Final: 0.0012

Final: -0.668 Target Depth:

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

PointID:

Sounding:

CPTu00-7S rev 2

70

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.4415

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0366

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: 85.101

CPTu01-0C

4

Date: 08/10/2016

Predrill: 11.40

Water Level: 3.60

Collapse:

Final: 0.7977

Final: 0.0369

Final: 14.91

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: S. Cardona

Cone Reference: 151125T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3753

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0387

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: 5.661

CPTu01-5N

5

Date: 05/10/2016

Predrill: 19.00

Water Level: 2.10

Collapse:

Final: 0.401

Final: 0.0356

Final: 6.554

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3363

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0019

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -6.733

CPTu01-5S

6

Date: 18/10/2016

Predrill: 17.10

Water Level: 4.20

Collapse:

Final: 0.3258

Final: 0.0018

Final: -5.082

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Operator: S. Cardona

Cone Reference: 160925T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-15

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: -0.1585

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0021

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: 4.87

CPTu02-0N

Date: 12/10/2016

Predrill: 12.50

Water Level: 5.00

Collapse:

Final: -0.1891

Final: 0.0012

Final: 6.575

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

Page 36: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

TEST DETAIL

Sounding: 12

Operator: R. Wyllie

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Date: 23/11/2016

Predrill: 16.93

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3945

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0029

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -10.681

Final: 0.3737

Final: 0.0021

Final: -5.03 Target Depth:

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

PointID:

Sounding:

CPTu02-7S

8

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: S. Cardona

Cone Reference: 160925T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-15

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: -0.1946

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0037

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: 1.467

CPTu03-8S

9

Date: 13/10/2016

Predrill: 13.20

Water Level: 3.50

Collapse:

Final: -0.1839

Final: 0.0013

Final: 6.607

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

Operator: R. Wyllie

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3883

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0044

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -5.672

Date: 23/11/2016

Predrill: 13.20

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 0.3784

Final: 0.0023

Final: -3.414

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Sounding:

CPTu04-2N

42

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: R. Wyllie

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.4021

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0035

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -8.42

CPTu04-7S

47

Date: 26/11/2016

Predrill: 16.00

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 0.4099

Final: 0.0024

Final: -6.795

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Operator: R. Wyllie

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.4253

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0028

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -3.319

CPTu05-5S

Date: 25/11/2016

Predrill: 16.30

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 0.4072

Final: 0.0023

Final: -4.648

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

Page 37: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

TEST DETAIL

Sounding: 37

Operator: R. Wyllie

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Date: 22/02/2017

Predrill: 20.65

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.1132

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0324

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -4.029

Final: 1.1356

Final: 0.0275

Final: -2.698 Target Depth:

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

PointID:

Sounding:

CPTu06-3N

3

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.449

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0049

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -4.394

Date: 29/11/2016

Predrill: 18.20

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 0.447

Final: 0.0036

Final: -4.541

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Sounding:

CPTu06-8S

18

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.4544

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0056

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -2.545

CPTu07-1N

15

Date: 30/11/2016

Predrill: 17.00

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 0.4453

Final: 0.006

Final: -1.835

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: R. Wyllie

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.8196

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.023

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: 6.804

CPTu07-8C

16

Date: 16/02/2017

Predrill: 18.00

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 0.8052

Final: 0.021

Final: 8.26

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Operator: R. Wyllie

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 0.3939

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0028

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: 16.14

CPTu08-8C

Date: 22/11/2016

Predrill: 15.70

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 0.3953

Final: 0.0023

Final: 19.448

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

Page 38: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

TEST DETAIL

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

PointID:

Sounding:

CPTu09-8C

28

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: M. MacDonald

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.2151

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0359

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -4.247

CPTu11-2C

19

Date: 23/02/2017

Predrill: 21.30

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 1.3598

Final: 0.0265

Final: -5.6295

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

PointID:

Sounding:

Operator: R. Wyllie

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.2399

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0358

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -2.424

CPTu12-4C

20

Date: 25/02/2017

Predrill: 21.50

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 1.2249

Final: 0.0348

Final: -2.815

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

Operator: R. Wyllie

Cone Reference: 100992T

Cone Area Ratio: 0.75

Cone Type: I-CFXYP20-10

Tip Resistance (MPa) Initial: 1.3215

Local Friction (MPa) Initial: 0.0365

Pore Pressure (kPa) Initial: -0.751

Date: 26/02/2017

Predrill: 22.50

Water Level: -

Collapse:

Final: 1.4126

Final: 0.0328

Final: -1.109

Effective Refusal

Tip:

Gauge:

Inclinometer:

Other:

Target Depth:

Page 39: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu00-3C

Test Depth: 18.38

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 40: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu00-4N

Test Depth: 18.35

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 41: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu00-7S

Test Depth: 20.32

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 42: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu00-7S A

Test Depth: 15.39

Test Depth: 22.05

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 43: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu00-7S rev

Test Depth: 20.32

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 44: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu00-7S rev 2

Test Depth: 20.32

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 45: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu01-0C

Test Depth: 22.41

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 46: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu01-5N

Test Depth: 19.31

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 47: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu01-5S

Test Depth: 15.40

Test Depth: 21.35

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 48: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu02-0N

Test Depth: 16.32

Test Depth: 21.33

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 49: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu02-7S

Test Depth: 19.40

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 50: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu03-8S

Test Depth: 17.73

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 51: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu04-2N

Test Depth: 19.74

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 52: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu04-7S

Test Depth: 20.71

Test Depth: 24.46

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 53: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu05-5S

Test Depth: 19.75

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 54: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu06-3N

Test Depth: 20.70

Test Depth: 23.58

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 55: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu06-8S

Test Depth: 18.20

Test Depth: 21.74

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 56: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu07-1N

Test Depth: 22.23

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 57: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu8-8C

Test Depth: 24.11

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 58: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu9-8C

Test Depth: 24.54

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 59: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

DISSIPATION TESTS

PointID: CPTu11-2C

Test Depth: 24.97

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 60: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

CPT CALIBRATION AND TECHNICAL NOTES

These notes describe the technical specifications and associated calibration references pertaining to the following cone types:

I-CFXY-10 measuring cone resistance, sleeve friction and inclination (standard cone, 10cm²);

I-CFXY-15 measuring cone resistance, sleeve friction and inclination (standard cone, 15cm²);

I-CFXYP20-10 measuring cone resistance, sleeve friction, inclination and pore pressure (piezocone, 10cm²);

I-CFXYP20-15 measuring cone resistance, sleeve friction, inclination and pore pressure (piezocone, 15cm²);

I-C5F0p15XYP20-10 measuring sensitive cone resistance, sleeve friction, inclination and pore pressure (piezocone, 10cm²).

Dimensions

Dimensional specifications for all cone types are detailed below. All tolerances are routinely checked prior to testing and

measurements taken are manually recorded on CPT field sheets. All field sheets are kept on file and available on request.

Cone area ratio

α = A / B = 0.75

β = 1 - A / B = 0.25

Page 61: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

CPT CALIBRATION AND TECHNICAL NOTES (cont.)

Calibration

Each cone has a unique identification number that is electronically recorded and reported for each CPT test. The identification number enables the operator to compare ‘zero-load offsets’ to manufacturer calibrated zero-load offsets.

The recommended maximum zero-load offset for each sensor is determined as ± 5% of the nominal measuring range.

In addition to maximum zero-load offsets, McMillan Drilling also limits the difference in zero load offset before and after the test as ± 2% of the maximum measuring range. See table below:

Tip (MPa)

Friction (MPa)

Pore Pressure (MPa)

Maximum Measuring Range: 150 1.50 3.00

Nominal Measuring Range: 75 1.00 2.00

Max. ‘zero-load offset’: 7.5 0.10 0.20

Max ‘before and after test’: 3 0.03 0.06

Note: The zero offsets are electronically recorded and reported for each test in the same units as that of

each sensor.

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 62: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

CONE CERTIFICATES

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 63: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

CONE CERTIFICATES

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c

Page 64: Statement of evidence of Dr Michael Page (geotechnical

CONE CERTIFICATES

Ge

ne

rate

d w

ith C

ore

-GS

by G

ero

c