FIR No.033499/2017

u/s 379/411 IPC

PS Kirti Nagar

State Vs. Chetan

25.08.2020 Present: None for the State.

Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant/Accused Chetan Slo

Jitender R/o House No.5/448/1. Mohalla Mahram, Shahdara, North-

East. Dellhi.

This is an application u/s 437 CrPC for grant of bail of accused

Chetan.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that accused has

been falsely implicated in the present case, he is in JC since 30.07.2020, he has

clean antecedents, with respect to previous involvement report it has been

submitted that the police officials of Vivek Vihar Police Station have falsely

implicated accused in recent FIR and arrested him in the present FIR and that he

be released on bail.

On the other hand, IO ASI Satish Kumar in his reply has objected to

the release of accused and previous involvement report has been annexed.

Heard. Perused.

Keeping in view the overall facts & circumstances of the case,

accused Chetan is admitted to bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of

Rs.20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of jail

Superintendent concerned/Ld. Duty MM.

Accordingly, bail application is disposed of.

Bail bond/surety bond furnished, same be verified from

concerned 10.

Copy of this order be given dasti.

(Aakanksha)Duty MM/West/Delhi/25.08.2020

FIR No.13247/20 Uls 379/411/34 IPC

PS Patel Nagar

State Vs. Sanjay

25.08.2020

Present: None.

Report has been received from Dy. Superintendent, Central Jail

No.1, Tihar in the above case stating that the address of the accused Sanjay

S/o Sh. Shyam is not verified and reply of HC Amreek Singh has been

annexed with stating that accused does not reside and the address furnished

by him in the bail application.

Perused.

It transpires that vide order dated 19.08.2020, this Court has

directed release of accused Sanjay in the above case for a period of 45 days

on interim bail only after verification of his address from PS concerned.

Since as per the report of concerned PS and Dy. Superintendent, Central

Jail No.1, Tihar, the address of accused is not verified, the order dated

19.08.2020 is itself clear that accused shall not be released if the address is

not verified. Hence, accused be not released unless his address is verified as

per order dated 19.08.2020.

Let a copy of this order be sent to Jail Superintendent, Tihar for

information and necessary action.

(Aakanksha) Duty MM/West/Delhi/25.08.2020

FIR No.01327/2020

u/s 379/411 IPC

PS Punjabi Bagh State vs. Praveen

25.08.202Q thretgh-VCX

Present: None for the State.

Ms. Liza Gulati on behalf of registered owner/Komal Gulati in person.

This is an application for release of vehicle on superdari filed on behalf

of applicant/owner Komal Gulati.

No objection to the release of vehicle bearing registration no. DL 10SX

9788 (Activa) is tendered on behalf of the IO/HC Avdhesh Singh.

Application perused.

Instead of releasing the above mentioned vehicle and three mobile phones on

superdari, this Court is of the considered view that the vehicle has to be released as

per the directions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case titled as Sunder Bhai Ambalal

Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 2003 SC 638. The view of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court has been reiterated by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in case titled as Manjeet

Singh vs. State, (2014) 214 DLT 646 wherein it has been held that

"59. The valuable articles seized by the police may be released to the person, who, in

the opinion of the Court, is lawfiully entitled to claim such as the complainant at

whose house thefi, robbery or dacoity has taken place, after preparing detailed

panchnama of such articles; taking photographs of such articles and a security bond.

P.T.O.

FIR No.385/2020

u/s 33/58 Delhi Excise Act

PS Mundka

State Vs. Ashok Kumar

25.08.2020

Present: None for the State. Mr. Pranay Abhishek, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Ashok

Kumar.

This is an application for releasing of personal search on behalf

of applicant/accused Ashok Kumar.

Reply has been received from 1O HC Sunil Kumar, according to

which they have no objection if personal search items are released to the

Owner.

Heard. Perused.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, personal

search items be released to the applicant as per personal search memo after

due verification of identity and against proper receipt.

Copy of this order be given dasti.

(Aakanksha} Duty MM/West/Delhi/25.08.2020

FIR No.387/2020

u/s 356/379/411 IPC PS Tilak Nagar

State Vs. Harpreet Hunny @ London 25.08.2020

Present: None for the State. Mr. K. K. Singh. Ld. LAC for the applicant/accused Harpreet Hunny @ London S/o Harvinder R/o House No.B-145, Vishnu Garden. Khyala. New Delhi.

This is an application u/s 437 CrPC r/w Section 167 (2) CrPC for grant of bail/default bail to accused Harpreet @ Hunny @ London.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that accused is in JC since 03.06.2020, he belongs to a poor strata of family, charge sheet has not been filed despite lapse of 82 days, he has been falsely implicated in the present case, no recovery has been effected from him, he has not been previouslyconvicted in any case, and that he be granted bail/default bail.

On the other hand, IO ASI Surender Singh in his report, has submitted that accused has been released via order dated 08.07.2020 passed by Ld. Duty MM Sh. Kishore Kumar.

Heard. Perused.

Since accused has already been released via order dated 08.07.20200passed by Ld. Duty MM Sh. Kishore Kumar, the present application is disposed of as infructuous. However, at the request of Ld. Counsel for the accused, let the

intimation be sent to Jail Superintendent, Tihar Jail.

Hence, bail application is dismissed as infructuous.

Application stands disposed of accordingly.Copy of this order be given dasti.

(Aakanksha)Duty MM/West/Delhi/25.08.2020

FIR No.141/2020u/s 356/379/411 IPPC

PS Tilak Nagar

State Vs. Harpreet Hunny London

25.08.2020

Present: None for the State.

Mr. K. K. Singh, Ld. LAC for the applicant/accused Harpreet @

Hunny @ London S/o Harvinder R/o House No.B-145, Vishnu

Garden. Khyala. New Delhi.

This is an application u/s 437 CrPC r/w Section 167 (2) CrPC for

grant of bail/default bail to accused Harpreet @ Hunny @ London.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that accused is in

JC since 03.06.2020, he belongs to a poor strata of family, charge sheet has not

been filed despite lapse of 82 days, he has been falsely implicated in the present

case, no recovery has been effected from him, he has not been previously

convicted in any case, and that he be granted bail/default bail.

On the other hand, 1O ASI Sambhu Dyal in his report, has submitted

that accused has been released via order dated 08.07.2020 passed by Ld. Duty

MM Sh. Kishore Kumar.

Heard. Perused.

Since accused has already been released via order dated 08.07.2020

passed by Ld. Duty MM Sh. Kishore Kumar, the present application is disposed

of as infructuous. However, at the request of Ld. Counsel for the accused, let the

intimation be sent to Jail Superintendent, Tihar Jail.

Hence, bail application is dismissed as infructuous.

Application stands disposed of accordingly.

Copy of this order be given dasti.

(Aakanksha)Duty MM/West/Delhi/25.08.2020

FIR

No

.40

3/2

02

0

u/s 35

6/3

79

/41

1 IP

C

PS

Tilak

Nag

ar S

tate Vs. H

arpreet @

Hunny

@ L

ondon 25.08.2020 Present

None for the State.

Mr. K

. K. Singh. L

d. LAC

for the applicant/accused Harpreet H

unny London S/o H

arvinder R/o H

ouse No.B-145, V

ishnu Garden, Khyala. N

ew D

elhi.

This is

an

application u/s 437 CrP

C r/w

Section 167 (2) CrP

C for

grant of bail/default bail to accused H

arpreet @ H

unny L

ondon. L

d. Counsel for the applicant/accused has subm

itted that accused is in JC

since 03.06.2020, he belongs to

a poor strata of family, charge sheet has

no

t been filed despite lapse of 82 days, he has been falsely im

plicated in the present case,

no

recovery has

been effected

from

him,

he has

no

t been previously convicted in any case, and that he

be granted bail/default bail. O

n the other hand, IO A

SI A

mi L

al in his report, has submitted that

accused has been released via order dated 15.06.2020.H

eard. Perused.

Since accused has already been released via order dated 15.06.2020, the present application

is disposed of as infructuous. H

owever,

at the request of Ld. C

ounsel for the accused, let the intimation be sen

t to Jail Superintendent, T

ihar Jail. Hence, bail application is dism

issedas infructuous.

Applicationstands disposed

of accordingly.Copy o

f this order be given dasti.

(Aakanksha)Duty M

M/W

est/Delhi/25.08.2020

FIR

N

o.1

01

/20

20

u/s 3

56

/37

9/4

11

IPC

PS

Tila

k N

ag

ar

State V

s. Harp

reet H

un

ny

L

on

do

n

25.08.2020

Present: N

on

e for th

e State.

Mr. K

. K. Singh, L

d. L

AC

for the applicant/accused Harpreet

Hunny L

ondon S/o

Harvinder R/o House N

o.B-145, V

ishn

u

Garden. K

hyala,N

ew D

elhi.

This is a

n application w

s 43

7 C

rPC

r/w S

ectio

n 1

67

(2) CrP

C fo

r g

ran

t of b

ail/d

efa

ult b

ail to

accu

sed

Harp

reet

Hu

nn

y @

Lo

nd

on

.

Ld

. Co

un

sel fo

r the a

pp

lican

t/accu

sed

has su

bm

itted

that a

ccu

sed

is in

JC since 0

3.0

6.2

02

0, he b

elon

gs to a p

oo

r strata of fam

ily, ch

arge sh

eet has n

ot

been filed despite lapse o

f 82 days, h

e has b

een falsely im

plicated in

the present

case

, n

o

recov

ery

has

been

effected

from

him

, h

e

has

no

t b

een previously

con

victed

in an

y c

ase

, and

that h

e b

e granted bail/default bail.

On

the o

ther hand,

IO A

SI B

ho

m Singh in

his report,

has subm

itted th

at accused has b

een released

via o

rder dated 08.07.2020 passed by

Ld

. Duty

MM

concerned.

Heard.

Perused.

Since accused has already

been released via order d

ated 08.07.2020

passed by L

d. Duty

MM

concerned, the present

application is disposed

of

as

infructuous.H

owever,

at the request

of L

d. Counsel

for the

accused,let

the

intimation b

e sent to

Jail Superintendent,T

ihar Jail.

Hence, bail application

is dismissed a

s infructuous.

Applicationstands disposed

of accordingly.Copy of this order be given dasti.

(Aakänksha)Duty M

M/W

est/Delhi/25.08.2020

FIR

No

.38

8/2

02

0u

/s 35

6/3

79

/41

1 IP

C

PS

Tila

k N

ag

ar

State V

s. Harpreet H

un

ny

@ L

ondon 25.08.2020 Present:

None for the State.

Mr. K

. K

. Singh, Ld. L

AC

for the applicant/accused Harpreet

@

Hunny

@ London S

/o H

arvinder R/o H

ouse No.B-145,

Vishnu

Garden. Khyala, N

ew D

elhi.

Th

is is an

application u/s 437 CrP

C r/w

Section 167 (2) CrP

C fo

r grant o

f bail/default bail to

accused Harpreet

@ H

unny @ L

ondon. L

d. C

ounsel for the applicant/accused has subm

itted that accused is in JC

since 03.06.2020, he belongs to

a

po

or strata of fam

ily, charge sheet has n

ot

been filed despite lapse o

f 82 days, h

e has been falsely implicated in

the present case,

no

recovery

has been

effected from

him

, h

e has

no

t been previously

convicted in any case, and that he b

e granted bail/default bail. O

n the other hand,

IO A

SI B

hom Singh in his report,

has submitted

that accusedhas been released

via order dated 08.07.2020 passed by L

d. Duty M

M concerned.

Heard.

Perused.

Since accused

has alreadybeen released via order dated 08.07.2020

passed by L

d. Duty

MM

concerned,the present application

is disposed o

f as

infructuous.H

owever,

at

the requestof L

d. C

ounselfor

the accused,

let the intim

ationbe se

nt to

Jail Superintendent, Tihar Jail.

Hence, bail application

is dismissed a

s infructuous.

Application stands disposed of accordingly.

Copy o

f this order be given dasti.

(Aakanksha)D

uty

MM

/West(D

alhi(n

gn0 n

0

FIR

No

.46

3/2

02

0

u/s 2

5/5

4/5

9 A

rms A

ct

PS

Mo

ti Nag

ar

Sta

te V

s. Rah

ul @

Ro

hit

25.08.2020

Present:

No

ne fo

r the S

tate.

Mr. K

. K. Singh, L

d. C

ou

nse

l for th

e applicant/accused Rah

ul @

Ro

hit S

/o R

amesh

R/o W

2-460, Madipur V

illage, Delh

i.

Th

is is an

app

lication

u/s 43

7 C

rPC

for g

rant o

f bail o

f accu

sed

Rahul@

Rohit. L

d. C

ou

nse

l for th

e app

licant/accu

sed h

as sub

mitted

that accu

sed h

as

been

falsely implicated in

the p

resent c

ase, h

e is in

JC sin

ce 27

.06

.20

20

, matte

r is

no

t co

vere

d w

ith d

irection

s given by HP

C, an

d th

at he b

e released

on

bail.

On

the o

ther hand, IO

HC

Om

Prak

ash in

his report, h

as objected

to

the re

lease

of a

ccu

sed

an

d h

as an

nex

ed

previous crimin

al record

s of th

e a

ccu

sed

.

Heard

. P

erused

.

Keeping in

vie

w th

e ov

era

ll facts & circ

um

sta

nces o

f the c

ase a

s w

ell

natu

re o

f the o

ffen

ce a

nd

the fact o

f previous crimin

al inv

olv

em

en

to

f accu

sed

in

fou

r oth

er sim

ilar

offences, th

is Co

urt d

oes

no

t deem

it fit to

grant bail

to th

e

accu

sed

.H

ence, th

e b

ail application is d

ismisse

d.

Application stan

ds disposed

of accordingly.

Copy o

f this o

rder be given d

asti.

ok (A

akanksha) D

uty

M

M/W

est/D

elh

i/2

5.0

8.2

02

0-R

e e

e

FIR

No

.70

0/2

02

0

/s 2

79

IPC

PS Punjabi B

agh S

tate

vs. U

nk

no

wn

25.08.2020

Presen

t: N

on

e for the S

tate.

Mr. S

ush

il Ku

mar, h

usb

an

d o

f applicant/registered ow

ner/ M

anish in

pers

on

.

Th

is is an

application for re

lease

of v

eh

icle

o

n superdari filed

on

beh

alf

of applicant/registered o

wn

er/ Man

ish

No

objection to

the rele

ase

of v

eh

icle

bearing registration n

o. H

R 4

6C

68

59

(Tru

ck) is te

nd

ere

d o

n b

ehalf o

f the 1

O/S

I Su

mit D

han

kar.

Application perused.

Inste

ad

of releasing th

e ab

ov

e m

en

tion

ed

veh

icle

and

three m

ob

ile phones

on

superdari, this C

ou

rt is of th

e co

nsid

ere

d v

iew th

at the v

eh

icle

has to

be re

lease

d as

per th

e dire

ctio

ns o

f Ho

n'b

le S

upreme C

ou

rt in case title

d as S

un

der B

hai A

mb

ala

l

Desai V

s. Sta

te o

f Gujarat, A

IR 2

00

3 S

C 6

38

. Th

e view

of the H

on

'ble

Suprem

e

Co

urt h

as been

reite

rate

d by

Ho

n'b

le D

elhi H

igh C

ou

rt in case title

d

as M

anjeet

Singh

vs. S

tate, (2014) 21

4 D

LT

64

6 w

here

init h

as been

held

that :

"59

. Th

e valu

ab

leartic

les seized

by the police m

ay

be re

lease

d to

the p

erso

n,

who, in

the opinion of th

e Court,

is lawfully

en

titled

to claim

such

as th

e complainant

at

wh

ose

h

ou

se thef,

robbery o

r dacoity

has

taken

place, after preparing

deta

iled

panchnamna of su

ch articles; taking photographs

of su

ch a

rticle

s an

d a security b

on

d.

P.T

.O.

Jrediud aseke

-2 371/2020

14 IPC

T

he ph

oto

gra

ph

so

f such

articles sho

uld

be a

tteste

d o

r co

un

tersig

ned

by the

Nagar 60.

Anil

com

plain

ant,

accu

sed

as w

ell as by th

e perso

n to

wh

om

the custody is h

an

ded

ov

er.

Wh

erever

necessary

, th

e C

ou

rt m

ay

get

the

jew

elle

ry

artic

les

valu

ed

from

a

go

vern

men

t ap

pro

ved

valu

er.

61. h

e a

ctu

al p

rod

uctio

n o

f the v

aluab

le artic

les d

urin

g th

e trial sh

ou

ld n

ot b

e h.

insisted

up

on

an

d the p

ho

tog

raph

s alon

g w

ith the pan

chn

ama sh

ou

ld suffice fo

r the

purposes ofevidence."

Considering the facts and the circum

stancesand the law

laid down by the

higher courts, article in question i.e. vehicle bearing no.HR

46C 6859

(Truck) be

released to

the ap

plican

t/registered

ow

ner o

n verification o

f the p

articulars regarding

Ow

nersh

ipan

d after p

reparin

g p

anch

nam

a and

on

furmishing an

ind

emn

ity b

on

d as

per th

e valu

e of th

e veh

icle. It is furth

er directed

that th

e article ie. v

ehicle b

earing

no

HR

46

C 6859

(Tru

ck) shall be photographed

from all the angles. T

he Panchnam

a

and

Indemnity

Bond along w

ith photographs b

e filed with

final report.T

he application is disposed o

f accordingly.C

opy of this order be given dasti.

(Aakanksha)

MM

(Mahila

Court-05), W

est, T

HC

, Delh

i/ 25

.08

.20

20

FIR

No.371/2020

u/s 341/323/34 IPC

PS

Pate

l Nag

ar

Sta

te v

s. An

il

25.08.2020

Present: N

one for the State. M

r. Vish

al Sh

arma, L

d. Co

un

sel for applicant/accused Anil S

/o L

ate Sh.

Sant R

am.

This

is an

application u/s

437 C

rPC

for

bail on

behalf of

applicant/accused Anil.

Ld

. C

ou

nsel

for

app

licant/accu

sed

seeks

to

with

draw

th

e p

resent

application.

Heard.

Allow

ed.

At re

qu

est, p

rese

nt a

pp

licatio

n is d

ismissed

as w

ithd

raw

n.

(Aakanksha)

MM

(Mahila C

ourt-05), West

TH

C, D

elhi/ 2

5.0

8.2

02

0

FIR

N

o.0

14

70

1/2

02

0

PS

R

an

ho

la

Sta

te V

s. Am

it Ku

mar

Am

an

u/s

37

9 I

PC

25

.08

.20

20

(thro

ug

h V

C)

Present:

No

ne fo

r the S

tate.

Mr. A

mit G

ab

a, L

d. C

ou

nsel fo

r app

licant/accu

sed A

mit K

um

ar

Am

an

S/o C

hhote Lal R

/o 0

-80

, Kris

hn

a V

ihar, S

ulta

n P

uri,

Delh

i.

Th

is is

an

ap

plic

atio

n u

/s 43

7 C

rPC

for g

rant o

f bail o

f accu

sed

Am

it Ku

mar @

A

man

.

Ld

. Co

un

sel fo

r the a

pp

lican

t/accu

sed

has su

bm

itted

that a

ccu

sed

has

been

falsely implicated in

the p

resent c

ase o

n th

e b

asis o

f dis

clo

su

re s

tate

men

t, he

is in JC

since 1

8.0

7.2

02

0,

an

d th

at he b

e re

lease

d o

n b

ail.

On

the o

ther hand, IO

HC

Krish

an

Ku

mar Y

ad

av

in h

is repo

rt, has

objected to th

e rele

ase

of a

ccu

sed

o

n th

e ground that sco

oty

has b

een

reco

vered

from

his possession.

Heard

. P

erused

.

Keeping

in

vie

w

the

ov

era

ll facts

&

cir

cu

msta

nces

of

the

case,

accu

sed

Am

it Ku

mar

Am

an

is admitted to

bail o

n furnishing personal b

on

d

in th

e s

um

of R

s.10

,00

0/- w

ith o

ne su

rety in

the lik

e a

mo

un

t to th

e s

atis

factio

n

of jail S

up

erin

ten

den

tco

ncern

ed

/Ld

.Duty M

M.

Acco

rdin

gly

,b

ail applicationis disposed o

f.

Bail b

on

d/su

rety b

on

d n

ot fu

rnis

hed

.

Copy o

f this o

rder b

e se

nt to

Ld

. Co

un

sel fo

r the a

ccu

sed

on

his

email (am

itgab

a99

73

00

7@

gm

ail.com

)/wh

atsapp

(99

10

21

07

86

).

Ak

ah

(A

akanksha)" D

uty

MM

/West/D

elh

i/25

.08

.20

20

e-F

IR

N

o.6

15

/20

20

o

u/s

37

9/4

11

IP

C

PS

Tilak

Nag

ar

Sta

te V

s. Sach

in @

F

arra

25

.08

.20

20

Pre

sen

t: N

on

e fo

r the S

tate.

Mr. L

alit Kum

ar, Ld

. Co

un

sel fo

r applicant/Accused S

ach

in

@

Farra S

/o M

oh

an L

al R/o F

-705, J. J. Co

lon

y, R

agh

uv

ir Nag

ar,

New

Delh

i.

Th

is is an

application u

/s 43

7 C

rP

C fo

r gra

nt o

f bail o

f accu

sed

Sachin@ Farra.

Ld

. Co

un

sel fo

r the applicant/accused h

as su

bm

itted

that a

ccu

sed

has

been

false

ly im

plic

ate

d in

the p

rese

nt c

ase

, he is in

JC sin

ce 0

1.0

7.2

02

0, h

e h

as n

o

inv

olv

em

en

tin

an

y o

ther c

ivil o

r crim

inal c

ase

, that o

n 3

0.0

6.2

02

0 a

t ab

ou

t 7:0

0

pm

wh

en

he w

en

t for

so

me w

ork

in T

ilak

Nagar,

Po

lice o

fficia

lsstopped h

im a

nd

a false

case

was re

giste

red

, an

d th

at h

e b

e re

lease

d o

n b

ail.

On

the

oth

er hand,

IO H

C G

au

rav

in h

is reply h

as objected to

th

e

release of accused and previous involvem

ent report has been annexed.

Heard

. P

erused

.

Keeping

in

view

th

e o

verall

facts &

circu

mstan

ceso

f th

e case

.

accused

Sach

ín

Farra

is ad

mitte

d to

bail o

n fu

rnish

ing

perso

nal b

on

d in

the

sum

of R

s.20,000/- with

on

e surety

in th

e like amo

un

t to th

e satisfaction

of

jail Superintendentco

ncern

ed/L

d. D

uty MM

.

Accordingly,

bail applicationis disposed of.

Bail b

on

d/su

retyb

on

d n

ot fu

rnish

ed.

Co

py

of th

is ord

er b

e giv

en d

asti. (Aak

ank

sha)

Duty M

M/W

est/Delhi/25.08.2020

Keceurl

'nh aner 2518/20

V

FIR

No.2.31/2020 d

ated 17.03.202

u/s 379/411 IPC

PS Moti N

agar S

tate Vs. Jai P

rakash

@ S

wam

i

25.08.2020

Present: N

one for the State.

HC

Om

Prakash on

behalf of IO H

C Tej Pal in person.

HC

Om

Prakash has submitted that com

plainant Ram

Siromani

Shukla has refused to

join the TIP

proceedings as he is unable

to identify

and he is no

t keeping well and does n

ot w

ant to

appear before the Court.

IO H

C Tej P

al has recorded the statement of com

plainantto

this effect and seeks to

cancel the TIP proceedings

of the c

ase

property. H

eard. Perused.

Since statem

ent of the com

plainantto the

effect that he

has denied

to identify the

case

property, has

been annexed

with

CD

, the

application is allowed and T

IP is cancelled.

Copy of this order be given dasti. (Aakanksha)

Duty MM

/West/D

elhi/25.08.2020