Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
State Variations in the Child Outcome Summary Form Process. August 2007 Baltimore, MD. Lisa Balivet (AK) Part C Christine Demer (WY) B-5. About Alaska. Decision to use the COSF Received a GSEG in 2004 Stakeholder process Pilot process. About Wyoming. Birth-5 system - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
State Variations in the Child Outcome Summary Form
Process
Lisa Balivet (AK) Part C Christine Demer (WY) B-
5
August 2007Baltimore, MD
About Alaska
Decision to use the COSF
Received a GSEG in 2004
Stakeholder process
Pilot process
About Wyoming
Birth-5 system Decision to use
the COSF When data
collection started
How and why did you adapt the ECO Child Outcome Summary Form (COSF) to fit your state?
How are you defining “near entry” and “near exit”?
What State guidance and/or local practices exist related to teaming/collaboration to complete the COSF?
What State guidance and/or local practices exist related to who must take the lead or responsibility to ensure COSF is completed for each child?
How and when is the child outcomes measurement process explained to families?
What is the role of the family
in the child outcomes measurement process?
What additional state guidance or support has been developed for providers?
What is your COSF data entry and submission process?
What data and/or feedback do you have to-date about how the COSF process is working?
