State Quality Assurance CellDept. of Collegiate Education, GoK

CEQECONTINUOUS EVALUATION FOR QUALITY

& EXCELLENCE

Dept. of Collegiate Education

Quality

What is Quality !?! 1

Is Quality elusive !?! 2

Quality is a moving target3

Quality is never static4

Quality is never a goal5

QIntrospection1

Quality through Benchmarking

2

Continuous Evaluation3

Quality is Excellence4

Third Party Evaluation5

QNAAC has the mandate1

NAAC A&A Mandatory2

400 Universities3

36000 Colleges4

359 Government Colleges in K5

Old Colleges: 174(prior to 2007)New Colleges: 186(after 2007)

Government Colleges Matrix

Eligible Colleges: 174

Accredited: 114

Re-accredited: 34

NAAC Accreditation

NAAC Accreditation

Quality concerns

More than 50% Colleges not eligible for NAAC A&A

More than 50% Colleges to wait for 5 or more years

Colleges first to get 2(f) & 12 (B) status

Waiting period for Quality Assessment

Are IQACs really functional??? ??

CEQE

Q

IQAC

Benchmarking

Quality &

Excellence

CommitmentTo

Quality

Stakeholder’s Participation

CEQE

NAACPractices

&Procedures

Q

SQACSQAC

IQAC

CEQE

NAAC

The Quality Wheel

Synergy

CEQE

NAAC

Back 2 Back

As-is

As-is-to-be

Perspective Plan

HYR

AR

Evaluation

LoI

IEQA

SSR

Peer Team

Accreditation

Re-accreditation

CEQE

SQACSQAC

RJDRJD

QFsQFs

CollegesColleges

CEQE Roadmap

2. As-is Analysis

4. Colleges prepare thePerspective Plan :As-is-to-be Report

1. Preparation of Manuals and Training the Quality Facilitators

5. Submission of Half-yearly Progress

Report

Continuous Continuous Evaluation Evaluation for Quality for Quality

& & ExcellenceExcellence

6. Submission of Annual Reports

7. Annual Evaluation and Grading by the Department

3. Sharing the As-is Report

10001000

7 Criteria

36 Key Aspects

196 Indicators

NAAC METHODOLOGY

1000 Points

NAAC Criteria- 7

Student Support & Progression – 100 Points

Infrastructure & Learning Resources – 100 Pints

Research, Consultancy & Extension- 100 Points

Teaching-Learning & Evaluation 450 Points

Curricular Aspects – 50 Points

Governance & Leadership – 150 Points

Innovative Practices – 50 Points

1000 Points

NAAC Criteria- 7

Stu Supp & Progre – 4 Aspects – 18 Indicators

Infras & Learning Res – 6 Aspects – 43 Indicators

Res, Cons & Extension- 6 Aspects – 36 Indicators

Teaching-Learning & Eva. 6 Aspects- 32 Indicators

Curricular Aspects – 5 Aspects – 25 Indicators

Governance & Leadership – 6 Aspects – 30 Indicators

Innovative Practices – 3 Aspects – 12 Indicators

Sample of Curricular Aspects

Curricular Aspects

Weightage

Key aspect Grade Points

KAGP Weightage

Total Grade Points

1 Curriculum Design & Development

10 3 10x3 30

2 Academic flexibility

15 2 15x2 30

3 Feedback on Curriculum

10 4 10x4 40

4 Curriculum Update

05 3 5x3 15

5 Best Practices in curricular aspects

10 3 10x3 30

Total 50 145

145/50=2.9 GPA

CEQECEQE

PracticesPractices& &

ProceduresProcedures

Facilities Facilities for Learningfor Learning

Student Student ServicesServices

CEQE - Criteria

OtherOtherFacilitiesFacilities

Teaching-Teaching-LearningLearning

CE

QE

Putting systems in place

356 Colleges to host College Web-sites

Eligible Colleges to submit AQARs in addition to CEQE

Regional Joint Directorates to oversee

IQACs to be rejuvenated - Functional

356 Colleges to set up IQACs

Colleges to be evaluated in phased manner from 2012

CEQE grading to form the basis for NAAC A&A

QFs Training & Consultative Meeting

QFs QFs TrainingTraining

Developing Developing MethodologyMethodology

As-is &As-is &As-is-to-beAs-is-to-be

Continuous Continuous Evaluation forEvaluation for

Quality & Quality & Excellence Excellence

DCEDCE

Accredited Colleges

Not Accredited Colleges

Accredited but not Re-accredited

Colleges

Our context

Eligible but Not

Accredited

2(f) & 12 (B)

Recognized

Colleges

Non 2(f) and 12(B)

Colleges

Instrument to make room for

Young Colleges

Well established Colleges with “A” and “B” with more than 2.7 CGPA

Colleges with 2(f) & 12 (B) status

Colleges that doesn’t have buildings of their own

Identify uniqueness of Colleges

Criteria Weighta

ge Criteria-I 175Criteria-II 50Criteria-III 100Criteria-IV 75Criteria-V 100   

CEQE Roadmap

2. As-is Analysis

4. Colleges prepare thePerspective Plan :As-is-to-be Report

1. Preparation of Manuals and Training the

Quality Facilitators

5. Submission of Half-yearly Progress Report

Continuous Continuous Evaluation Evaluation

for Quality & for Quality & ExcellenceExcellence

6. Submission of Annual Reports

7. Annual Evaluation and Grading by the Department

3. Sharing the As-is Report

Continuous Evaluation for Quality and Excellence format

Part-I:Profile of the College:

Part-II: Criteria-wise Instrument

Part-III: •Strengths of the College:•Areas of concern:•Benchmarks recommended•Quality Facilitators’ Remarks

Lets work now

Thank you