Upload
doanlien
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff vs. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of
the United States, Defendant.
Case No. 1:12-CV-00128 (RMC, DST, RLW) Three-Judge Court
STATE OF TEXAS’ JOINT APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT 18
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 1 of 248
Williams Janice Self Austin TX
Williams Robert Wayne Self Austin TX
Wilson Andy Public Citizen Common Cause Austin TX
Windberg Thomas J Self Spicewood TX
Wisdom Barbara R Self Austin TX
Wittie David ADAPT of Texas Austin TX
Woods Traci Tarrant County Democratic Party Fort Worth TX
Wygal Shondra E Texas Young Democrats Houston TX
Yarber John Self Austin TX
Yarbrough Christianna South Denton County Democrats and TX Precinct
307
Flower Mound TX
Yeaman John F Self Austin TX
Young Deana Private Citizen Houston TX
On
Banks Annie M Texas Alliance for Retired Americans Houston
Curry Susan Self Alpine TX
Harris R D Cover Texas NOW Dallas ACORN Dallas TX
Higgins Carlos Texas SilverHaired Legislature Austin TX
Mays Sr Kenneth W Self Dallas TX
Sepehri John Secretary of State Austin TX
Providing written testimony
For
Alvarez Rosario Granada Homes Laborer LU1095 San Antonio TX
Gebolys Paul J PCT 4 Montgomery County The Woodlands TX
Harding James C Presiding Judge Harris County Rep Kingwood TX
Lannon Robert Grant Texas Borders Volunteers Austin TX
Lindsey Shirley Self League City TX
McDonald Tony Young Conservatives of Texas Austin TX
Mikus Jr Jerry J Self Pflugerville TX
Opiela Eric Republican Party of Texas Austin TX
Wallace Skipper Texas Republican County Chairs Association Lampasas TX
Against
Bell Doug Travis County Democrats Austin TX
Burke Terri ACLU of Texas Austin TX
TX 00002795JA_003278
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 2 of 248
Dickinson Glenda Self Sealy TX
Dodd Daniel Democratic Party of Collin County McKinney TX
Flores Jr Enrique UAW and Labor Council for Latin American
Advancement Arlington TXFord Rachel Baker Self Garland TX
Gauthier Lloyd Self Houston TX
Glasscock Nancy Self Temple TX
Henderson Elaine Self Lago Vista TX
Hinojosa Gilberto Cameron County Democratic Party Committee Member
Democratic National Committee Brownsville TX
Korbel George Self LULAC San Antonio TX
Leeder Jennie Lou Llano County Llano TX
Mainard Marcia TDW Greenville TX
Resa Arthur Bell County Democratic Party Belton TX
SandersCastro Judith LULAC and Rosa Rosales Nat l Pres San Antonio TX
Spoon Harley Self Austin TX
Vera Jr Luis League of United Latin American Citizens Washington DC
Whichard Steve Self Austin TX
On
Dean Sheila Self Austin TX
TX 00002796JA_003279
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 3 of 248
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE
THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
EIGHTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SENATE
AUSTIN TEXAS
IN RE
CONSIDERATION OFSENATE BILL 362
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SENATE
TUESDAY MARCH 10 2009
BE IT REMEMBERED THAT AT 1238 p..m. on
Tuesday the 10th day of March 2009 theabove-entitledmatter was heard at the Texas State Capitol
Senate Chamber Austin Texas before the Committee of
the Whole Senate and the following proceedings were
reported by Aloma J. Kennedy a Certified Shorthand
Reporter of
VOLUME 1A PAGES 1 - 208
E- NNEDY11.IF1-_T1- NOiJ21-i LJ
a record of excellence
1801 Lavaca Suite 115 Austin Texas 78701 512-474-2233
TX_ 00 7 iýJA_003280
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 4 of 248
i
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 PAGE
3 VOLUME 1A
4 PROCEEDINGS TUESDAY MARCH 10 2009 2
5 ROLL CALL NO. 1 2
6 OPENING INSTRUCTIONS BY SEN. DUNCAN 5
7 OBJECTION TO FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF SB 362SEN. WEST 12
8
ROLL CALL NO. 2 38
9
LAYING OUT OF SENATE BILL 36210 SEN FRASER 44
11 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 53
12 VOLUME 1B
13 INVITED TESTIMONY 210
14 TESTIMONY BY HANS VON SPAKOVSKY 210QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 21.8
15
TESTIMONY BY TOVA ANDREA WANG 27716 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 287
17 TESTIMONY BY CAMERON QUINN 300QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 306
18
TESTIMONY BY TOBY MOORE 33619 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 344
20 TESTIMONY BY FRANK B. STRICKLAND 373
QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 41721
TESTIMONY BY ADAM SKAGGS 40822 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 417
23 TESTIMONY OF ROBERT A. SIMMSSUBMITTED BY WES TAILOR 435
24
TESTIMONY BY J. GERALD HEBERT 44225 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 450
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003858JA_003281
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 5 of 248
11
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 PAGE
3 VOLUME 2
4 PROCEEDINGS WEDNESDAY MARCH 11 2009 482
5
QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR CONTINUED 4826
7 TESTIMONY BY THOMAS WHEELER 502QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 510
8
TESTIMONY BY CHANDLER DAVIDSON 5219 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 527
10 TESTIMONY BY ED JOHNSON 559QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 566
11
TESTIMONY BY DANIEL B. KOHRMAN 621
12 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 628
13 TESTIMONY BY COBY SHORTER 653QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 655
14
TESTIMONY BY DENNIS BOREL 70615 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 713
16 TESTIMONY BY GARY GLEDSOE 724QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 731
17
TESTIMONY BY ERIC NICHOLS 74218 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 750
19
20 PUBLIC TESTIMONY 771
21 CLAIRE OXLEY GLUCK 771
22 HAZEL COTTON 773QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 775
23
KATHY HICKS 77624 JAMES E. CARTER 779
RUSTY HICKS 78125
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003859JA_003282
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 6 of 248
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 PAGEPUBLIC TESTIMONY CONTINUED
3
TINA BENKISER 7844 B.R. SKIPPER WALLACE 787
ANITA PRIVETT 7895 MARY ANN COLLINS 792
6 ROSA ROSALES 794QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 797
7
DUSTIN RYNDERS 8008
MARSHA CORREIRA 8039 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 806
10 RENE LARA 807LEE MEDLEY 810
11 JOHN WATKINS 811KENNETH FLIPPEN 813
12 ANNIE BANKS 816RACHEL HERNANDEZ 817
13 RENATO DE LOS SANTOS 819JUDY HOLLOWAY 823
14 LYDIA CAMARILLO 825EDWARD B. WILLIAMS 828
15 MADELEINE DEWAR 830HELEN VILLARREAL 833
16 MARK WILLIAMSON 835VANESSA FOSTER 838
17
LUIS FIGUERO 840i8 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 844
19 PATTI EDELMAN 844SYLVIA MENDOZA 846
20 KENNETH KOYM 848KAREN RENICK 850
21 JONI ASHBROOK 853DUANE RAWSON 856
22 ROD FLUKER 858
23 ROLL CALL NO. 3 864
24
PROCEEDINGS CONCLUDED 86925
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003860JA_003283
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 7 of 248
lv
1 EXHIBIT INDEX
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 1A Sen. Van de Putte 3/3/09 Memoto Sen. Duncan re ground rules
4 for Committee of the WholePubic hearing 21 21
5
lB Sen. Duncan 3/5/09 Memo to Sen.6 Van de Putte re response to
concerns about ground rules7 for the Committee of the Whole
Senate 21 21
8
2. Letter to Texas Attorney General9 Greg Abbott re Hearing on SB
362 signed by 11 Senators 21 21
10
3. Senate Notice of Public11 Hearing on SB 362 for 3/10/09 21 21
12 4. Texas Senate Agenda 3/10/09 21 21
13 5A 3/10/09 Tag Form signed bySen. Royce West et al 21 21.
14
5B 3/10/09 Tag Form signed by15 Sen. Mario Gallegos 21 21
16 6. Roll Call No. 2 - Sen.Gallegos Appeal of Ruling
17 of Chair on Sen. WestsPoint of Order 120 120
18
7. Institute of Public Policy19 Publication entitled The
Effects of Photographic20 Identification on Voter
Turnout in Indiana A21 County-Level Analysis
by Jeffrey Milyo Report22 10-2007 Revised December
2007 120 12023
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003861JA_003284
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 8 of 248
V
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 8. AU News publication entitledMuch-hyped Turnout Record
4 Fails to Materialize -
Convenience Voting Fails to5 Boost Balloting 120 120
6 9. Symposium paper entitledThe Empirical Effects of
7 Voter-ID Laws Present orAbsent by Jason D. Mycoff
8 Michael W. Wagner andDavid C. Wilson 120 120
9
10. 9/10/07 Report of the10 Heritage Center for Data
Analysis entitled New11 Analysis Shows Voter
Identification Laws Do Not12 Reduce Turnout by David B.
Muhlhausen and Keri Weber13 Sikich 120 120
14 11. New York Times article -
September 23 2005 - entitled15 Voting Reform is in the
Cards by Jimmy Carter16 and James A. Baker III 160 160
17 12. Harvey Kronbergs Quorum ReportApril 23 2007 entitled Royal
18 Masset The Voter ID Bill WillKill My Mothers Right to Vote 160 1.60
19
13. 2/3/08 article entitled A20 Clearer Picture on Voter ID
by Jimmy Carter and James A.21 Baker III 160 160
22 14. Testimony of Hans A. vonSpakovsky March 10 2009
23 re SB 362 217 217
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00003862JA_003285
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 9 of 248
v
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 15A 6/11/07 Letter to SenateCommittee on Rules and
4 Administration re Hans A.
von Spakovsky nomination 254 2545
15B 6/12/07 Article entitled6 Obama Raises Concerns Over
FEC Nominees Record of7 Partisanship 254 254
8 15C 10/3/07 Letter to the U.S.Senate from Public Citizen 254 254
9
16. Institute of Public Policy10 Publication entitled The
Effects of Photographic11 Identification on Voter
Turnout in Indiana A12 County-Level Analysis by
Jeffrey Milyo Report13 10-2007 Revised December
2007 SAME AS EXHIBIT 7 265 26514
17. Testimony of Tova Andrea Wang15 Vice President Research Common
Cause March 10 2009 re SB 362 300 30016
18. Report of the Commission on17 Federal Election Reform entitled
Building Confidence in U.S.18 Elections September 2005 313 313
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003863JA_003286
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 10 of 248
Vii
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 19. Fifteen letters to the Hon.Dianne Feinstein Chair and the
4 Hon. Robert F. Bennett rankingminority member U.S. Senate
5 Committee on Rules andAdministration
6
1. 6/29/07 letter from Hans7 A. von Spakovsky
2. 3/22/07 letter from various8 members of Congress
3. 3/13/07 letter from William9 H. Jordan
4. 2/08/07 letter from Gary J.
10 Smith5. 2/26/07 letter from P. K.
11 Brunelli6. 3/01/07 letter from J. A.
12 Borras7. 2/21/07 letter from Trey
13 Grayson8. 2/20/07 letter from Beverly
14 B. Kaufman9. 2/19/07 letter from Todd
15 Rokita10. 2/16/07 letter from Frank
16 B. Strickland11. 2/14/07 letter from Tom Lowe
17 12. 2/13/07 letter fromT. Rogers Wade
18 13. 2/14/06 letter from JohnnyIsakson
19 14. 2/09/07 letter from WesleyR. Kliner Jr.
20 15. 3/13/07 letter from RayMartinez III 333 333
21
20. Brennan Center For Justice letter22 dated October 3 2007 by
Executive Director Michael23 Waldman with attachments 335 335
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003864JA_003287
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 11 of 248
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 21. Prepared Remarks of Dr. TobyMoore Research Triangle
4 regarding Evidence of the
impact of voter ID requirements5 and the prospects of US DOJ
preclearance March 10 2009 358 3586
22. Harris County Map submitted7 by Sen. Gallegos 366 366
8 23. Testimony of Frank B.
Strickland re SB 3629 March 10 2009 373 373
10 24. Testimony of Adam SkaggsCounsel Democracy Program
1-1 Brennan Center for Justice atNYU School of Law regarding
12 The Myth of Voter ImpersonationFraud at the Polls
13 March 10 2009 408 408
14 25. Written Testimony of Robert A.
Simms Georgia Deputy Secretary15 of State presented to the
United States Senate Committee16 on Rules and Administration
submitted by Wes Tailor 435 43517
26. Testimony of J. Gerald Hebert18 re SB 362 March 10 2009 442 442
19 27. Letter from Rene Guerra March 62009 Criminal District Attorney
20 of Hidalgo CountySubmitted by Sen. Lucio 479 479
21
28. 3/4/09 Letter from Todd22 Rokita Indiana Secretary
of State to Sen. Fraser23 re SB 362 502 502
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003865JA_003288
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 12 of 248
IX
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 29. Testimony of Chandler DavidsonTsanoff Professor of Public
4 Affairs Emeritus Rice Universityregarding The Historical Context
5 of Senate Bill 362 March 102009 521 521
6
30. 3/06 Printout from Texas AG7 Website entitled Helping Stamp
Out Voter Fraud in Texas by8 Greg Abbott Attorney General
of Texas submitted by9 Sen. Shapleigh 550 550
10 31. Dashwood case documentssubmitted by Ed Johnson Harris
11 County Tax Assessor-Collectorand Voter Registrars Office 559 559
12
32. Records from specific Harris13 County voting documents
submitted by Ed Johnson 559 55914
33. Harris County Deceased15 Voting History miscellaneous
registration applications16 submitted by Ed Johnson 559 559
17 34. Texas Voter RegistrationApplication form submitted
18 by Sen. Huffman 570 570
19 35. Testimony of Daniel B.
Kohrman Senior Attorney20 AARP Foundation re SB 362
March 10 2009 621 62721
36. Photographs of Voter Education22 Anderson County Workshop 2008 724 724
23 37. Testimony of Gary L. BledsoePresident Texas NAACP
24 re SB 362 March 10 2009 724 724
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003866JA_003289
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 13 of 248
X
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED38. Number of voters who have
3 registered since 2006 withouta drivers license number
4 submitted by Sen. Watson 767 767
5 39. The Special InvestigationsUnit Role and Investigative
6 Efforts and Fundingsubmitted by Sen. Huffman 767 767
7
40. Slip Opinion U.S. Supreme8 Court Crawford vs. Marion
County Election Board9 October Term 2007 768 768
10 41. U.S. Supreme Court Crawfordvs. Marion County Election
Il Board on Writ of Certiorarito U.S. Court of Appeals for
12 the Seventh Circuit Brief ofTexas Alabama Colorado
13 Florida Hawaii MichiganNebraska Puerto Rico and
14 South Dakota as Amici CuriaeSupporting Respondents 768 768
15
42. Written Testimony of Claire16 Oxley Gluck from Boerne in
Kendall County re SB 362 773 77317
43. Written Testimony of Hazel18 Cotton of Texarkana Texas
re SB 362 775 77519
44. Written Testimony of Kathy20 Hicks of Texarkana Texas
re SB 362 779 77921
45. Written Testimony of Donald22 Giles of Texarkana Texas
re SB 362 783 78323
46. Written Testimony of Anita24 Privett League of Women
Voters of Texas re SB 362 789 78925
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003867JA_003290
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 14 of 248
X7.
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 47. Written Testimony of RosaRosales League of United
4 Latin American CitizensNational President
5 re SB 362 794 794
6 48. Written Testimony of DustinRynders Advocacy Inc.
7 re SB 362 800 800
8 49. Written Testimony of MarshaCorreira re SB 362 804 804
9
10 50. Written Testimony of RachelA. Hernandez re SB 362 817 817
11
51. 10/17/08 Article by Nelda12 Wells Spears Voter Registrar
Travis County entitled 4000013 Voter Registration Applications
Processed in Time For Early14 Voting 825 825
15 52. Written Testimony of LydiaCamarillo SVREP Vice
16 President re SB 362 826 826
17 53. Written Testimony of LuisFigueroa Mexican American
18 Legal Defense and EducationFund MALDEF re SB 362 841 841
19
54. Written Testimony of Sylvia20 Mendoza re SB 362 848 848
21 55. Written Testimony of Dr. RodFluker Sr. Executive Director
22 for Texas Association of BlackPersonnel in Higher Education
23 re SB 362 861 861
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003868JA_003291
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 15 of 248
2
1 P R O C E E D I N G S
2 TUESDAY MARCH 10 2009
3 1238 p.m.
4 PRESIDENT DEWHURST Members the Senate
5 will come to order. Pursuant to a resolution
6 previously adopted the Senate resolves itself into
7 the Committee of the Whole for the consideration of
8 Senate Bill 362. The senator from Lubbock
9 Sen. Duncan will please take the chair for the
10 duration of the proceedings in the Committee of the
11 Whole.
12 Off the record 1238 p.m. to
13 1242 p.m.
14 SEN. DUNCAN The Committee of the Whole
15 Senate will come to order. The secretary will call
16 the roll.
17 ROLL CALL NO. 1
18 SECRETARY SPAW Averitt
19 SEN. AVERITT Indicated presence
20 SECRETARY SPAW Carona
21 SEN. CARONA Indicated presence
22 SECRETARY SPAW Davis
23 SEN. DAVIS Indicated presence
24 SECRETARY SPAW Deuell
25 SEN. DEUELL Indicated presence
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003869JA_003292
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 16 of 248
1 SECRETARY SPAW Duncan
2 SEN. DUNCAN Indicated presence
3 SECRETARY SPAW Ellis
4 SEN. ELLIS Indicated presence
5 SECRETARY SPAW Eltife
6 SEN. ELTIFE Indicated presence
7 SECRETARY SPAW Estes
8 SEN. ESTES Indicated presence
9 SECRETARY SPAW Fraser
10 SEN. FRASER Here.
11 SECRETARY SPAW Gallegos
12 SEN. GALLEGOS Indicated presence
13 SECRETARY SPAW Harris
14 SEN. HARRIS Indicated presence
15 SECRETARY SPAW Hegar
16 SEN. HEGAR Indicated presence
17 SECRETARY SPAW Hinojosa
18 SEN. HINOJOSA Indicated presence
19 SECRETARY SPAW Huffman
20 SEN. HUFFMAN Indicated presence
21 SECRETARY SPAW Jackson
22 SEN. JACKSON Indicated presence
23 SECRETARY SPAW Lucio
24 SEN. LUCIO Indicated presence
25 SECRETARY SPAW Nelson
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003870JA_003293
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 17 of 248
4
1 SEN. NELSON Indicated presence
2 SECRETARY SPAW Nichols
3 SEN. NICHOLS Indicated presence
4 SECRETARY SPAW Ogden
5 SEN. OGDEN Indicated presence
6 SECRETARY SPAW Patrick
7 SEN. PATRICK Indicated presence
8 SECRETARY SPAW Seliger
9 SEN. SELIGER Here.
10 SECRETARY SPAW Shapiro
11 SEN. SHAPIRO Indicated presence
12 SECRETARY SPAW Shapleigh
13 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Indicated presence
14 SECRETARY SPAW Uresti
15 SEN. URESTI Indicated presence
16 SECRETARY SPAW Van de Putte
17 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Indicated presence
18 SECRETARY SPAW Watson
19 SEN. WATSON Indicated presence
20 SECRETARY SPAW Wentworth
21 SEN. WENTWORTH Here.
22 SECRETARY SPAW West
23 SEN. WEST Indicated presence
24 SECRETARY SPAW Whitmire
25 SEN. WHITMIRE Indicated presence
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003871JA_003294
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 18 of 248
1 SECRETARY SPAW Williams
2 SEN. WILLIAMS Indicated presence
3 SECRETARY SPAW Zaffirini
4 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Indicated presence
5 SEN. DUNCAN The Chair present.
6 SECRETARY SPAW Mr. President
7 PRESIDENT DEWHURST Indicated
8 presence
9 SEN. DUNCAN A quorum is present.
10 OPENING INSTRUCTIONS BY SEN. DUNCAN
11 SEN. DUNCAN Members before we get
12 started I wanted to kind of briefly discuss how we
13 will proceed here. And I think you all know the
14 resolution gives the Chair the power to allow time
15 limits. Many of you have wanted to bring and begin
16 with invited testimony and those would be persons
17 with expertise that can help the body understand the
18 issues involved in the legislation that we are about
19 to consider and that will be honored. Each side has
20 submitted a list of witnesses and I assume the order
21 of those witnesses is available to us at this time.
22 After the author of the bill is
23 recognized to lay out the bill then I will recognize
24 the proponents first witness their expert in support
25 of their bill. And then after that we will go in
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003872JA_003295
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 19 of 248
6
1 alternating order so that then those who are in
2 opposition to the bill if they want to bring witness
3 expert or invited witness in then we would go in that
4 order.
5 So in other words well have one for
6 and one against one for and one against as we go
7 through. There are several of those witnesses. I
8 believe there are eight witnesses that have been
9 identified by those in opposition to the bill and
10 there are about seven that have been identified for
11 those in favor of the bill. So we will move that on.
12 The Chair will impose on each one of
13 those witnesses a 10-minute time limit. However Seri.
14 Van de Putte indicates that they have one witness that
15 may take longer than that. And if youll approach the
16 bench before or the dais before that person comes on
17 Sen. Van de Putte we will adjust that time limit to
18 accommodate the concerns that you raised.
19 Members Im going to refrain from
20 recognizing any member to interrupt a witness during
21 their initial time limit. In other words we will
22 allow the witnesses to complete their testimony and
23 then you can ask questions after that. You will be
24 recognized in order of your pressing your call button
25 on your desk.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003873JA_003296
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 20 of 248
1 And I will remind each and every one of
2 you we have a number of guests who are here today or
3 members of the public who wish to testify as well and
4 they have been here since about 8 oclock in the
5 morning and they would like to testify on this bill.
6 And so what we are trying to do is accommodate their
7 interest as well.
8 I know that you all have important
9 questions to ask of the invited witnesses but I would
10 ask you to keep in mind that we have members of the
11 public who have also traveled here from other cities
12 and other areas of the state that would like to have
13 their voices heard today as well. So if we could
14 respect that as well.
15 Once we conclude with the invited
16 testimony then we will start the process for public
17 testimony. The Chair intends to impose athree-18minute time limit on public testimony. As with
19 invited witnesses the Chair will not entertain any
20 questions of the witness until they have completed
21 their three-minute testimony or concluded prior to the
22 three minutes.
23 As the persons have enrolled to testify
24 the resolution requires -- and I think our rules have
25 always required -- that before a witness can testify
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX 00003874JA_003297
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 21 of 248
8
1 they sign an affirmation that is more or less an oath
2 or is an oath before they testify. Persons who have
3 been filling out their cards have been doing that all
4 day long and we have a procedure in there for them to
5 sign up to testify.
6 Its my understanding that the Secretary
7 of the Senate has done a nice job of preparing
8 instructions for them on how the process will work.
9 And they have been given written instructions on how
10 they will be called. It is the Chairs intention to
11 call the witnesses in the order in which they arrived
12 and registered to be witnesses today. Each one of
13 those cards was given a number and those witnesses
14 will be called in order.
15 And there is always a problem with
16 witnesses who are not available at the time theyre
17 called. We will have witnesses hopefully in the
18 gallery. The gallery is not full. So if you know
19 youre going to testify and your number is fairly
20 close you should be in the gallery. We also have an
21 overflow room in the auditorium. Everybody has been
22 instructed as to that. Its the Chairs intention to
23 call witnesses in advance of their being on the floor
24 and they are to report in the back hallway. And then
25 there is a process for security and a process for
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003875JA_003298
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 22 of 248
9
1 admitting them to the floor.
2 We will have them come through here and
3 give us testimony in an orderly fashion. And if
4 someone does not arrive at the time their name is
5 called or within 30 minutes of their name -- let me
6 repeat that and be clear. If a witness does not
7 arrive within 30 minutes of the time their name will
8 be called then they will lose their opportunity to
9 testify. So were going to try to be very flexible in
10 trying to allow people time to get here. But we need
11 to be able to stay on schedule and move -- and respect
12 every other witness right to be heard.
13 Time limits are -- I think all of our
14 committees observe time limits. At least the ones
15 that I serve on do. And time limits are not designed
16 to limit the testimony that witnesses have to say
17 its designed to allow everyone who has presented to
18 testify if possible. And so what Im concerned
19 about in putting a time limit in is that people
20 understand that your time limit is based on the fact
21 that there are many people that want to testify and
22 so we need to allow them to have their opportunity as
23 well.
24 Finally we had a little discussion
25 about this in the discussion on the resolution when we
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003876JA_003299
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 23 of 248
10
1 were in session. The rules of decorum of the Senate
2 will be enforced. And that means for those in the
3 gallery that we -- the rules of the Texas Senate do
4 not permit clapping or applause when were in a
5 deliberative session like this do not permit
6 clapping applause or demonstrations. There may be
7 times when you wish to be excited about something you
8 agree with or disagree with but it is inappropriate
9 in the Senate chamber to express that. There will be
10 no placards or billboards or things dropped over the
11 rail. Any of that will subject the person doing it to
12 being expelled from the Senate gallery.
13 And Im sure it wont come do this but
14 if it comes to this it comes to a point in time to
15 where after warning the gallery generally is not
16 observing the rules of the Senate with regard to
17 decorum well then the Chair would entertain a
18 motion at that time or may on sua sponte request
19 that the gallery be cleared. The only reason I say
20 that is is that the decorum and the ability to hear
21 witnesses and to deliberate in a professional way on
22 this is very important. And those rules were designed
23 to allow us to do that and they will be enforced.
24 So those in the gallery and those
25 watching on TV please understand that. I would hate
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003877JA_003300
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 24 of 248
1 to have to make a ruling or to have anyone removed
2 from the gallery but we will need to do that if it
3 gets out of hand.
4 I need to clarify that the witnesses
5 should report to the front of the chambers. And I
6 always am confused about east west south north or
7 front or back. But the front of the Senate chambers
8 that would be the west doors next to the witness
9 registration desk and that would be the door thats
10 closest to the rotunda in our Texas Senate.
11 Members I want to introduce to you
12 today our court reporter Aloma J. Kennedy of Kennedy
13 Reporting Service. She is an independent certified
14 shorthand court reporter and she will. be taking down
15 the testimony today. So it will be necessary for
16 either me or you to identify yourself in the record
17 whenever you speak or rise to testify or rise to ask a
18 question.
19 Ill probably just recognize you by
20 name and the court reporter will get that. Because
21 the court reporter is a human being we will need to
22 take a rest every now and then for her to rest her
23 fingers and arms because she has a hard job.
24 Normally with a court reporter every hour and a half
25 to two hours and Ill let her kind of give me a
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003878JA_003301
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 25 of 248
2
1 signal whenever she is ready to take a five-minute
2 break.
3 Members thats more or less the--4those are the issues and those are kind of the way
5 were going to run things. So having explained that
6 the Chair lays out Senate Bill 362 and recognizes
7 Sen. Fraser to explain the bill.
8 OBJECTION TO FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF SB 362
9 SEN. WEST Mr. Chairman
10 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. West for what
11 purpose
12 SEN. WEST Objection on further
13 consideration -- any consideration of Senate Bill 362
14 in that it violates Rule 11.18 and also would raise
15 Rule 11.10. Rule 11.18 is No bill may be reported
16 to the Senate before it has been the subject of an
17 open public hearing before a committee or
18 subcommittee.
19 My specific objection deals with the
20 notice. Notice of the hearing on the bill must be
21 posted in a public place at lease 24 hours before the
22 hearing is to begin. The posting of notice on this
23 particular bill was at 622 p.m. on March the 9th
24 therefore any consideration before that would be in
25 violation of that rule.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003879JA_003302
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 26 of 248
13
1 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. West bring your
2 point of order forward.
3 Off the record 1255 p.m. to
4 1258 p.m.
5 SEN. WEST Mr. Chairman
6 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. West for what
7 purpose
8 SEN. WEST Mr. Chairman for further
9 clarification on my point of order for further
10 consideration of this bill at this time I would raise
11 Rule 13.04. 13.04 governs the procedure in a
12 committee of the whole The rules of the Senate as
13 far as applicable shall be observed in Committee of
14 the Whole Senate.
15 And then I would raise our Rule No.
16 11.18 as relates to the posting of the bill being at
17 least 24 hours before the hearing is to begin. And
18 specifically the notice of the hearing must be posted
19 in a public place.
20 And then also I would raise Rule 11.1
21 in terms of the No committee or subcommittee except
22 a conference committee shall meet at least without 24
23 hours public notice.
24 Off the record 1258 p.m. to
25 114 p.m.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003880JA_003303
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 27 of 248
1 SEN. DUNCAN Members a point of order
2 has been raised. Rules 11.10 and 11.18 do not control
3 meetings of the Committee of the Whole and are
4 inapplicable. 13.01 reflects the Senates manifest
5 right to resolve itself into committee of the whole at
6 any time after the morning call. The Senate has
7 resolved into the Committee of the Whole by Senate
8 resolution. The Chair may neither call a meeting of
9 the Committee of the Whole or schedule a bill for
10 hearing.
11 Article XI standing and special
12 committees operate without direct day-to-day
13 supervision of the Senate. Standing and special
14 committees have the ability to meet subject to the
15 call of the chair so long as the Senate is not
16 meeting.
17 Committee of the Whole presents the
18 obverse situation to standing and special committees.
19 The tag rule is intended to give each member 48-hour
20 written notice of the time and place of a public
21 hearing of standing and special committees. The rules
22 directly conflict with Rule 13.01 and the Senates
23 right to resolve into the committee of the Whole at a
24 moments notice if the Senate so desires. Every
25 member of the Senate is a member of the Committee of
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003881JA_003304
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 28 of 248
1 the Whole having equal rights of notice and
2 participation.
3 Your point of order is respectfully
4 overruled.
5 SEN. WEST Mr. Chairman
6 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. West for what--7SEN. WEST Parliamentary inquiry. So
8 that I can understand this under Rule 13.04 it says
9 that The rules of the Senate as far as applicable
10 shall be observed in the Committee of the Whole
11 So by your very ruling youre saying that the posting
12 notice to the public is a rule that the Committee of
13 the Whole does not have to abide by
14 SEN. DUNCAN Senator that would
15 conflict with the ability in the rules of the Senate
16 to resolve into a committee of the whole at any time
17 it desires. So in its conflict it would be
18 inapplicable.
19 SEN. WEST So public notice does not
20 apply to the Committee of the Whole even though we
21 are taking substantive testimony on this issue
22 SEN. DUNCAN Public notice laid out by
23 the rules that you have cited does not.
24 SEN. WEST Okay. So for future
25 generations of legislators specifically the Senate
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003882JA_003305
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 29 of 248
1 posting notice does not apply to the Committee of the
2 Whole Thats essentially the ruling Let me ask
3 this question Once
4 SEN. DUNCAN Go ahead Senator.
5 SEN. WEST You have cited Rule 13.01
6 that talks about resolving. Is resolving synonymous
7 with hearing a bill
8 SEN. DUNCAN Senator the Senate can
9 resolve for whatever purpose it desires.
10 SEN. WEST Right. And the question is
11 you cited in your ruling that 13.01 provides the basis
12 for your ruling. And as I understand it resolving is
13 coming into the Committee of the Whole hearing a bill
14 thats separate from resolving. Its a separate act
15 than just resolving.
16 SEN. DUNCAN Well Senator we can
17 resolve for any purpose and the purpose was to hear
18 the bill. Moreover -- and I will remind you that a
19 courtesy posting on the date time and location of the
20 hearing was performed over a week ago which is well
21 in advance of any public notice that would be required
22 of a standing committee. And so the only change that
23 you have referred to was a courtesy posting that was
24 done yesterday with regard to the change of time that
25 occurred whenever there was a motion to adjourn until
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003883JA_003306
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 30 of 248
1 1000 instead of 900 and so were talking about an
2 hours difference here. So again I think that we
3 have resolved by resolution of the Senate to deal- with
4 this. The Senate certainly was in session pursuant to
5 the constitution and the rules of the Senate.
6 SEN. WEST Yes sir Mr. Chairman. But
7 the broader question though is one of resolving and
8 hearing the bills and whether or not public notice of
9 bills that are to be considered by the Committee of
10 the Whole are required by the Senate rules.
11 I mean essentially youre saying that
12 the Committee of the Whole by your ruling that we
13 dont have to provide the public notice there is
14 no -- we dont have to deal with transparency as
15 relates to considering bills in this committee we can
16 just do it at our own whim and thats inconsistent
17 with everything weve been doing in this body in terms
18 of transparency. If Im wrong about it -- I just want
19 to make sure the record is clear.
20 And historically Mr. Chairman when we
21 have had bills in the Committee of the Whole we have
22 provided notice to the public so that the public could
23 be here like they are now. And what Im hearing today
24 is is that that notice provision is not applicable
25 anymore as a result of the ruling of the Chair. I
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003884JA_003307
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 31 of 248
18
1 mean correct me if Im wrong.
2 SEN. DUNCAN Senator we are resolved
3 into a Committee of the Whole by the resolution we
4 adopted which laid out the bill that was to be
5 considered. As a result we thought we were following
6 the rules by resolving into a Committee of the Whole
7 which would apply at any time we so desire therefore
8 the rules that youre citing to would conflict with
9 the ability of the Senate to freely resolve into a
10 Committee of the Whole to more informally discuss and
11 debate witnesses -- or the issues including the
12 invitation of witnesses to come in and testify as we
13 have done here.
14 SEN. WEST Does it also conflict with
15 Rule 13.04
16 SEN. DUNCAN Senator 1.3.04 provides
17 the -- it provides for the conflicts that may occur
18 with the concept of committee of the whole and other
19 rules by saying that the rules of the Senate apply
20 if applicable. And if they conflict -- where they
21 conflict those rules wouldnt apply.
22 SEN. WEST And this is my last
23 question. So youre saying that the notice provision
24 the notice to the public concerning legislation at the
25 Committee of the Whole will take up conflicts with
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003885JA_003308
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 32 of 248
1 9
1 the Committee of the Wholes right to resolve
2 SEN. DUNCAN Senator the way the
3 Committee of the Whole operates and the design of that
4 from time immemorial would -- giving the Senate the
5 ability to resolve into itself as a Committee of the
6 Whole to informally debate an issue at any time it
7 desires would conflict with those posting rules.
8 SEN. WEST Thank you Mr. Chairman.
9 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Mr. Chairman
10 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Shapleigh for what
11 purpose
12 SEN. SHAPLEIGH During the Senate
13 portion of this before we got into committee we had
14 a discussion there about some housekeeping matters
15 that I think we need to make very clear for this
16 record. This portion is being kept for the official
17 record by a stenographer hired by the Senate. Is that
18 correct
19 SEN. DUNCAN Thats correct.
20 SEN. SHAPLEIGH And for the purposes of
21 the official record should it be transmitted to any
22 third party we have agreed that the stenographers
23 record may be utilized
24 SEN. DUNCAN Im not sure I understand
25 your question. Would you repeat it
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003886JA_003309
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 33 of 248
20
1 SEN. SHAPLEIGH If we have to establish
2 the official proceedings of whats happened here today
3 for for example the Department of Justice in
4 Washington D.C. the record that is being made by the
5 stenographer whose equipment is there and who sits in
6 Patsy Spaws office can be used to establishthat-7record
8 SEN. DUNCAN Senator its my
9 understanding that this will be a record that can be
10 used to establish the record of the testimony that is
11 given to the Senate and the debate.
12 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Now for the purposes
13 of making sure that we have the record to send I
14 would like to talk a little bit about the procedure
15 for the Secretary of the Senate to take documents and
16 keep them to append to the record. Weve had
17 discussions already about several documents the
18 letters to and from Sen. Van de Putte and yourself
19 the letter to AG Abbott the notice of the posting
20 that Sen. West was talking about and this green Texas
21 Senate agenda. Am I to understand that if we want
22 these made a part of the record we can deposit them
23 with the Secretary of the Senate
24 SEN. DUNCAN I would suggest that you
25 do that but I would also suggest that you identify
11
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003887JA_003310
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 34 of 248
2
1 and just move to put them into the record so that you
2 have a clear marker of where they are and at what time
3 they came in so that whoever is reading the record
4 will have an opportunity to relate the documents to
5 the testimony.
6 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Well at this time I
7 would like to with your permission mark and deliver
8 to her Exhibits 1A and B Sen. Van de Puttes letter
9 to you and your response to her as Exhibit 2 her
10 letter to AG Abbott as Exhibit 3 the notice of the
11 posting time that Sen. West has talked about as
12 Exhibit 4 the Senate agenda that was distributed
13 today and Exhibit 5 the signed tag that brought this
14 point of order to the Chair.
15 SEN. DUNCAN Your evidence is received.
16 Exhibit Nos. 1 through 5 marked and
17 admitted
18 SEN. DUNCAN And it may be that what we
19 would do is just keep a numerical order of those
20 exhibits when they come in. But I put the challenge
21 on you to make sure that you get them marked and
22 submitted to the Secretary so they get into the record
23 appropriately.
24 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Thank you.
25 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Gallegos for what
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003888JA_003311
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 35 of 248
22
1 purpose
2 SEN. GALLEGOS Parliamentary inquiry.
3 Mr. Chairman in lieu -- on the ruling on
4 Sen. Wests -- what he asked for I want to appeal the
5 ruling of the Chair on this issue.
6 SEN. WILLIAMS Mr. President
7 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Williams of Harris--8or Montgomery rather.
9 SEN. WILLIAMS I would move to table
10 the motion that Sen. Gallegos just made.
11 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Williams
12 Sen. Gallegos.
13 Off-the-record discussion at the bench
14 SEN. WILLIAMS Mr. Chairman -- or
15 Mr. President -- or Mr. Chairman I guess I should
16 say.
17 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Williams.
18 SEN. WILLIAMS Mr. Chairman I
19 respectfully will withdraw my motion to table. As I
20 understand its not appropriate to have a motion to
21 table an appeal to the ruling of the chair in
22 committee. However I also believe that the rules
23 provide that that motion would be in order were we on
24 the floor. So its my mistake. I withdraw my motion.
25 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Williams withdraws
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003889JA_003312
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 36 of 248
1 his motion to table. Sen. Gallegos sends up an appeal
2 to the ruling of the Chair.
3 Sen. West for what purpose
4 SEN. WEST Out of all due respect
5 Mr. Chairman Im trying to figure out what rules
6 apply and what rules dont. And if we could just get
7 some idea of what Senate rules are going to apply and
8 then you know all. of us will know exactly what the
9 rules are.
10 So I just need to know what rules apply.
11 I thought the Senate rules applied. But again
12 theres some wiggle room in there and I just want to
13 know how to proceed. As an example the Attorney
14 General -- well Ill come back to that. But again 1
15 just need to know what rules apply as it relates to--16you know we can do anything we want to do we can
17 resolve and pretty much do what we want to do. Im
18 trying to figure out why his motion wouldnt be
19 honored.
20 SEN. DUNCAN Senator currently we are
21 in the motion of -- Sen. Gallegos has a motion to
22 appeal before the body. You have a parliamentary
23 inquiry. Why dont we handle that as those issues
24 come up. Lets go ahead and deal with the appeal of
25 the ruling of the Chair that has been raised by
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003890JA_003313
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 37 of 248
2
1 Sen. Gallegos.
2 Sen. Gallegos youre recognized to
3 speak on that.
4 Brief pause
5 SEN. WENTWORTH Sen. Gallegos youre
6 recognized to argue in favor of your motion.
7 SEN. GALLEGOS Mr. Chairman the reason
8 for my appeal is that evidently the rules are unclear
9 on what rules that were going by on major
10 legislation I think and I believe that the Senate
11 rule should be applicable to major legislation such
12 as the bill that is trying to be laid out before us
13 that any major piece of legislation under the Senate
14 rules the ones that Sen. Royce West said. And Ive
15 got another tag on similar rules that I believe that
16 the Senate rules are applicable to major legislation
17 thats heard on this floor whether it be Committee of
18 the Whole or regular Senate committee hearings.
19 And that is why you know until we find
20 out what rules that were working on I believe that
21 the rules of the Senate should be applicable to this
22 bill here and thats why Im appealing the ruling of.
23 the Chair.
24 SEN. WENTWORTH Okay. Members a
25 motion -- Im sorry. The Chair recognizes Sen.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX 00003891JA_003314
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 38 of 248
2
1 Williams.
2 SEN. WILLIAMS Mr. Chairman I would
3 like to speak on Sen. Gallegos motion thats before
4 us.
5 SEN. WENTWORTH Youre recognized.
6 SEN. WILLIAMS Thank you.
7 Respectfully Sen. Gallegos I would
8 encourage you to read the rules that we have on the
9 Committee of the Whole. And before I made this rule
10 change at the beginning of the session I very
11 carefully looked at the rules of the Committee of the
12 Whole. And we also considered how that has worked
13 because I wasnt familiar with it quite frankly.
14 And its clear to me after reading th .
15 and other documents that relate to parliamentary law
16 that a ruling other than what the Chair has made would
17 put the body in conflict with itself. The purpose of
18 the Committee of the Whole is to allow the body to
19 dissolve into that committee and consider important
20 matters before the entire body.
21 And to require that the posting rule
22 apply before we could do that would be to restrict the
23 bodys inherent ability to dissolve into the Committee
24 of the Whole. And so the standing committee rules as
25 I understand it dont apply universally to this
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003892JA_003315
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 39 of 248
26
1 proceeding that were in.
2 And I think it would be a grave mistake
3 for this body to try to impose upon ourselves a
4 posting rule so that if theres some important matter
5 that we need to consider in an informal basis like a
6 committee hearing is not as we hear it on the floor
7 it would unnecessarily restrict our ability to do so.
8 And there are many examples in our
9 history as a Senate where we have resolved into the
10 body of the whole and considered bills and legislation
11 without posting those things. So respectfully I just
12 wanted to point that out to the body Mr. Chairman.
13 SEN. WEST Will Sen. Williams yield
14 SEN. WILLIAMS I yield.
15 SEN. WENTWORTH Sen. West for what
16 purpose
17 SEN. WEST Question of Sen. Williams.
18 SEN. WENTWORTH Do you yield to Sen.
19 West
20 SEN. WILLIAMS I yield.
21 SEN. WENTWORTH He yields.
22 SEN. WEST Sen. Williams I recognize
23 that oftentimes we resolve and we dont post to take
24 up -- we resolve into the Committee of the Whole to
25 take up issues. But in this instance we decided to
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003893JA_003316
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 40 of 248
27
1 post follow the Senate rules and post. And then we
2 decided to repost. And now were hearing that posting
3 is not applicable to the Committee of the Whole. And
4 thats why Im taking so much time on this given the
5 issues of transparency that the public demands and 1
6 know that you support.
7 The issue in my mind is is that once we
8 set up and make this ruling were now telling the
9 public were now telling the State of Texas that this
10 committee can take up legislation without giving the
11 public notice. Thats what were saying.
12 SEN. WILLIAMS Well Sen. West
13 respectfully I think you turn the intent of the
14 posting rule on its head with your logic. And if the
15 purpose of the posting rule is so that the public can
16 have adequate notice there is no argument that can be
17 made. This has been widely disseminated over the
18 Internet in the popular media.
19 And in fact the posting here was
20 merely a courtesy. The purpose of the posting rule is
21 not primarily to notify the public. The primary
22 purpose of the posting rule is to make sure that the
23 other members of the body know whats going on when
24 you have a standing committee that comes together and
25 its subject to the call of the chair.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003894JA_003317
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 41 of 248
281
1 It is an important secondary thing that
2 we also give notice to the public. But I dont think.
3 you can reasonably argue that the public wasnt aware
4 of what proceedings were going to be taking place. We
5 have over 100 witnesses that have testified. And
6 surely you dont think because it wasnt posted in
7 the back hall that somebody didnt show up for this
8 meeting.
9 SEN. WEST Sen. Williams I understand
10 your logic. And frankly Im kind of baffled by i.t.
11 The reality is is that the decision that yall are
12 going to make today is that the posting notice does
13 not apply to the Committee of the Whole. Thats this
14 argument. And the reality is is that when you decide
15 to post there is a certain amount of things that we
16 have to do according to our rules. There are certain
17 rights and privileges and all of that that are tied to
18 that posting. When you repost it resets the clock
19 it resets the clock.
20 Here is the way I look at it The
21 reality is this -- and you and I had this debate you
22 and I had this debate when we were going through the
23 rules change -- you guys -- the majority of the body
24 decided to change the rules. Okay. And you have the
25 votes you have the gavel you change the rules. And
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003895JA_003318
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 42 of 248
29
1 thats fine. I can deal with that. But those are the
2 rules.
3 Im just saying lets make certain
4 that given the rules that we now have that all of us
5 can apply those rules to this situation. And when we
6 sit up and say that the Senate of the whole -- the
7 Senate can resolve itself into the whole committee and
8 these rules posting is not applicable I think we
9 need to think about it.
10 I understand that were dealing with
11 issues you know voting issues that was always
12 something that was very divisive in this body. But
13 what Im saying to you as my desk mate and as a
14 colleague were got to really think about the
15 decision that were making today saying that when we
16 take up these types of issues that posting should not
17 be applicable.
18 SEN. WILLIAMS Sen. West I appreciate
19 the courtesy that youve shown me in explaining your
20 side of this. And what I would politely try to point
21 out to you is that I dont believe that we are today
22 deciding that the posting rule doesnt apply to the
23 Committee of the Whole. That has been decided a long
24 time ago.
25 SEN. WEST When was it decided
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003896JA_003319
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 43 of 248
30
1 SEN. WILLIAMS That is a part of the
2 body of parliamentary law that exists already. And it
3 is in the spirit of whats in the rules that relate to
4 the Committee of the Whole and the purpose. So yes
5 were reaffirming that that doesnt apply today. And
6 the mere act of giving public notice does not then
7 subject you to a rule that didnt apply before. And I
8 think thats the ruling that the Chair has made and
9 think correctly so.
10 Thank you Sen. West.
11 SEN. WEST Look forward to the vote.
12 SEN. WENTWORTH The Chair recognizes
13 Sen. Lucio of Cameron County.
14 SEN. LUCIO Will Sen. Williams please
15 yield for a question
16 SEN. WENTWORTH Sen. Williams you
17 yield
18 SEN. WILLIAMS I yield.
19 SEN. WENTWORTH Sen. Williams yields.
20 SEN. LUCIO Thank you Sen. Williams.
21 I think all of us will agree that rules
22 are important to this process and if were not to
23 follow them then as a point of clarification maybe
24 you could tell me what other rules do not apply to
25 this extraordinary piece of legislation
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003897JA_003320
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 44 of 248
3
1 SEN. WILLIAMS Well Sen. Lucio it
2 wouldnt be appropriate for me -- Im not presiding
3 over this -- it wouldnt be appropriate for me to
4 presume the role of the chair of this Committee of the
5 Whole. I think its up to his discretion on that.
6 And I think that my -- Ill leave it to -- rather than
7 say to his discretion I think Ill leave that to
8 the Chair to make those rulings as the issues come
9 forward.
10 My response was really centered at--11since the issues that Sen. Gallegos raised when he
12 explained his appeal to the ruling of the Chair. And
13 I would reiterate again that its not my belief that
14 all of the standing committee rules apply to the
15 Committee of the Whole that we should not restrict
16 ourselves on the ability to resolve into the body of
17 the whole. It is designed for the Senate to be able
18 to rapidly take up an issue with everyone involved.
19 It is a unique situation much different than a
20 standing committee is.
21 And so there is a long history as I
22 said of this body resolving into the Committee of the
23 Whole to consider matters resolutions and legislation
24 where no posting was done whatsoever. And to say that.
25 the mere act of giving public notice then subjects you
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003898JA_003321
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 45 of 248
32
1 to that rule is to turn the Senate rules on their
2 head in my opinion.
3 SEN. LUCIO Well but you know they
4 shouldnt have been posted then if that would have
5 been the case in my opinion as well. Youre a very
6 good student of the rules and thats why I asked this
7 question. I think we need to revisit the rules and
8 we need to rewrite the rules so it can be very clear
9 and not have to waste the publics time next time we
10 have a proceeding as such.
11 SEN. WILLIAMS Thank you Sen. Lucio.
12 SEN. WENTWORTH Sen. Van de Putte.
13 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Thank you
14 Mr. President. I would like to speak -- appeal -- and
15 not maybe particularly at Seri. Williams but he brings
16 up some very interesting comments. According to our
17 Senate rules on 13.04 The rules of the Senate as
18 far as applicable shall be observed in the Committee
19 of the Whole Senate.
20 So as far as applicable. And although
21 this question on this appeal is about posting we
22 dont post when we go into Committee of the Whole.
23 And probably as Sen. Williams has said because we
24 dont know when were going into the Committee of the
25 Whole. We dont know when were going to go back into
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003899JA_003322
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 46 of 248
33
1 the Committee of the Whole and resolve to talkabout-2the Easter vacation schedule and whether we should be
3 off on Holy Thursday and Good Friday. And although
4 that is important it is about the logistics and the
5 work schedule.
6 This is very different. When the rules
7 of the Senate were changed on the first week of the
8 session it was done so to circumvent our normal
9 two-thirds rule on one particular issue voter ID.
10 And because there is a bill -- this is a legislative
11 bill -- it is not the Senate resolving to talk about a
12 holiday schedule it is not the Senate that is
13 resolving to talk about should we go and attend
14 someone on the Senate their parents funeral and the
15 logistics for that it is not the Senate resolving to
16 plan the retirement party for our former secretary of
17 the Senate Betty King.
18 Those are the things that we do because
19 it is the business of the Senate. This is the
20 business of the people. And we are going to add
21 another barrier to the basic right to vote and yet
22 by the ruling we are going to say the people have no
23 business knowing that were going to take up a
24 legislative bill.
25 And so maybe for the purposes of this
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003900JA_003323
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 47 of 248
34
1 appeal -- this is special. You made it special. You
2 said this was more important than anything else. And
3 so we are taking up -- and maybe the posting is not--4Sen. Williams I vehemently disagree with you. The
5 posting is not for our convenience. Were here we
6 have staff. We know when were going to meet. It is
7 for the public. It is because we are going to add
8 barriers to their basic right to vote but they ought
9 to have the posting if the Senate is going resolve
10 into the Committee of the Whole to change the way and
11 the possess that they vote. It is their business.
12 And so this is very different from the
13 Committee of the Whole resolving to discuss a work
14 schedule or to plan a party or to make funeral
15 arrangements. This is the peoples business. And I
16 would ask you to think on this appeal. What we are
17 saying is that when there is legislation before the
18 Committee of the Whole that we dont have to give
19 notice.
20 Although notice was given -- and it is
21 very much appreciative -- to have this ruling set in
22 our Senate rules for the senators that may not even be
23 born yet is a terrible precedent. It shuts the
24 public out. So because of the special order and
25 because were meeting in the Committee of the Whole
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003901JA_003324
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 48 of 248
35
1 for one bill that was deemed so important that it
2 couldnt go by regular Senate rules didnt go to the
3 Committee of Jurisdiction we changed that.
4 But we ought to at least afford the
5 public the opportunity to know in future generations
6 when theyre about to be asked to change how they
7 vote and what processes are used. And so when I ask
8 you to think about the appeal dont think about us
9 think about all the wonderful Texans here who always
10 exercise their right to vote.
11 SEN. WENTWORTH The Chair recognizes
12 Sen. Williams.
13 SEN. WILLIAMS Thank you.
14 Well Sen. Van de Putte respectfully I
15 would say theyre here. People from both sides of the
16 issue are here. And I think the effect of Sen.
17 Gallegoss appeal would be to send them home so that
18 they couldnt participate in this process today.
19 SEN. WENTWORTH Members Sen. Gallegos
20 has appealed the ruling of the Chair. The Secretary
21 will. call the roll. A vote of Aye--22SEN. GALLEGOS Mr. Chairman
23 SEN. WENTWORTH Sen. Gallegos.
24 SEN. GALLEGOS May I -- I want to reply
25 to Sen. Williams if I may.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003902JA_003325
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 49 of 248
36
1 SEN. WENTWORTH The Chair recognizes
2 Sen. Gallegos.
3 SEN. GALLEGOS Sen. Williams you know
4 I respect your remarks. And let me just say what my
5 colleagues have already told you in their remarks.
6 You said its a unique situation. It is. And you
7 said that there was Internet postings the media that
8 has posted so you know everybody is supposed to
9 know.
10 Well I beg to differ with you. This is
11 an issue that is unique because you made it unique
12 when we passed that resolution that completely did
13 away with the two-thirds rule. So when you said its
14 a unique situation it is because only -- and only on
15 this issue do we do away with the two-thirds rule that
16 has always been a tradition of the Texas Senate.
17 And let me remind you Senator that we
18 got elected here everybody on this floor to notify
19 and at least let our constituents know whats going on
20 here. And I will be the last one to say to them that
21 Im going to depend on Internet postings and the media
22 to post you know this unique bill that you have made
23 unique by the resolutions that we passed earlier this
24 session and doing away with the two-thirds rule on
25 this issue.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003903JA_003326
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 50 of 248
1 So I would really tell you
2 Sen. Williams that the only really way to tell the
3 people that elected you and me about this unique
4 situation that we have on this floor today is by
5 public posting something that we were elected to do
6 to tell them -- not the Internet not the media or
7 anybody else or the grapevine or whatever else you
8 want to call it.
9 Its a public posting thats what it
10 is. And I will refer in my appeal to the rules that
11 Sen. Van de Putte did 13.04. And it says The rules
12 of the Senate as far as applicable shall be observed
13 in Committee of the Whole Senate. And also on Rule
14 20.02 it says The Presidents ruling is subject to
15 appeal to the entire Senate.
16 And thats what Im doing right now
17 Mr. Chairman and Sen. Williams. With all due respect
18 I do appeal the ruling of the Chair.
19 SEN. WENTWORTH All right. Members
20 Seri. Gallegos has appealed the ruling of the Chair. A
21 vote of aye will sustain the Chair a vote of nay22 will overturn the Chair.
23 The Secretary will call the roll.
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003904JA_003327
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 51 of 248
R
1 ROLL CALL NO. 2
2 SECRETARY SPAW Averitt
3 SEN. AVERITT I confirm.
4 SECRETARY SPAW Carona
5 SEN. CARONA Indicated aye vote
6 SECRETARY SPAW Davis
7 SEN. DAVIS Nay.
8 SECRETARY SPAW Deuell
9 SEN. DEUELL Indicated aye vote
10 SECRETARY SPAW Duncan
11 SEN. DUNCAN Present not voting
12 SECRETARY SPAW Ellis
13 SEN. ELLIS Indicated nay vote
14 SECRETARY SPAW Eltife
15 SEN. ELTIFE Indicated aye vote
16 SECRETARY SPAW Estes
17 SEN. ESTES Indicated aye vote
1.8 SECRETARY SPAW Fraser
19 SEN. FRASER Aye.
20 SECRETARY SPAW Gallegos
21 SEN. GALLEGOS Indicated nay vote
22 SECRETARY SPAW Harris
23 SEN. HARRIS Indicated aye vote
24 SECRETARY SPAW Hegar
25 SEN. HEGAR Indicated aye vote
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003905JA_003328
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 52 of 248
1 SECRETARY SPAW Hinojosa
2 SEN. HINOJOSA Indicated nay vote
3 SECRETARY SPAW Huffman
4 SEN. HUFFMAN Indicated aye vote
5 SECRETARY SPAW Jackson
6 SEN. JACKSON Indicated aye vote
7 SECRETARY SPAW Lucie
8 SEN. LUCIO Indicated nay vote
9 SECRETARY SPAW Nelson
10 SEN. NELSON Indicated aye vote
11 SECRETARY SPAW Nichols
12 SEN. NICHOLS Indicated aye vote
13 SECRETARY SPAW Ogden
14 SEN. OGDEN Indicated aye vote
15 SECRETARY SPAW Patrick
16 SEN. PATRICK Indicated aye vote
17 SECRETARY SPAW Seliger
18 SEN. SELIGER Indicated aye vote
19 SECRETARY SPAW Shapiro
20 SEN. SHAPIRO Indicated aye vote
21 SECRETARY SPAW Shapleigh
22 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Indicated nay vote
23 SECRETARY SPAW Uresti
24 SEN. URESTI Indicated nay vote
25 SECRETARY SPAW Van de Putte
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003906JA_003329
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 53 of 248
I0
1 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Indicated nay
2 vote
3 SECRETARY SPAW Watson
4 SEN. WATSON Indicated nay vote
5 SECRETARY SPAW Wentworth
6 SEN. WENTWORTH Indicated aye vote
7 SECRETARY SPAW West
8 SEN. WEST Indicated nay vote
9 SECRETARY SPAW Whitmire
10 SEN. WHITMIRE No.
11 SECRETARY SPAW Williams
12 SEN. WILLIAMS Indicated aye vote
13 SECRETARY SPAW Zaffirini
14 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Indicated nay vote
15 SECRETARY SPAW Mr. President
16 PRESIDENT DEWHURST Indicated aye17 vote
18 SEN. WENTWORTH There being 19 ayes 12
19 nays and one present not voting the ruling of the
20 Chair is sustained.
21 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Mr. Chair
22 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Shapleigh
23 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Welcome back.
24 SEN. DUNCAN Thank you.
25 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Can we make that vote
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003907JA_003330
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 54 of 248
1 since we dont have electronically recorded votes an
2 Exhibit 6
3 SEN. DUNCAN Yes Senator. I think all
4 votes should be made part of the record and they are
5 part of the record.
6 Sen. Fraser. The Chair recognizes
7 Sen. Fraser to lay out Senate Bill 362.
8 SEN. GALLEGOS Mr. President
9 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Gallegos for what
10 purpose
11 SEN. GALLEGOS Mr. Chairman I want to
12 tag this Senate Bill on Ruling 11.19 on 48-hour notice
13 to all Senate members and I believe thats 11.19.
14 SEN. DUNCAN Senator bring your point
15 of order forward.
16 SEN. GALLEGOS My tag is already up
17 there.
18 Brief pause
19 SEN. GALLEGOS Mr. President I would
20 move to tag the bill and request a 48-hour notice to
21 all Senate members pursuant to Rule 11.19.
22 SEN. DUNCAN Senator are you rising on
23 a point of order
24 SEN. GALLEGOS Im tagging the bill.
25 SEN. DUNCAN Let me rephrase the
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003908JA_003331
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 55 of 248
/2
1 question. I think you would have to raise a point of
2 order on further consideration of the bill based on
3 the tag.
4 SEN. GALLEGOS Well I raise the point
5 of order to disallow any further consideration of
6 Senate Bill 362.
7 SEN. DUNCAN Okay.
8 SEN. GALLEGOS And I have done that in
9 reference by submitting a tag to the Secretary of the
10 Senate.
11 SEN. DUNCAN Thank you Sen. Gallegos.
12 For the reasons previously stated in the
13 prior point of order raised by Sen. West your point
14 of order is respectfully overruled.
15 SEN. GALLEGOS Thank you
16 Mr. President.
17 SEN. DUNCAN Thank you Senator.
18 SEN. WEST To make sure the record is
19 clear--20 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. West.
21 SEN. WEST Parliamentary inquiry.
22 Sen. Gallegos as well as some other members of the
23 Senate filed a motion to tag for further
24 consideration of Senate Bill 362. Your ruling would
25 be the same as it relates to that motion to tag also
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003909JA_003332
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 56 of 248
ý3
1 There were two motions to tag filed.
2 SEN. DUNCAN Senator the
3 interpretation and the basis for the overruling of
4 Sen. Gallegos motion and your motion and a motion
5 with regard to the tag rule would be that the rules do
6 not apply -- are not applicable and Ive made that
7 ruling. And that would be -- the ruling would be
8 consistent with the earlier ruling I made on your
9 motion.
10 SEN. WEST Okay. And I just wanted to
11 make certain that were basically dealing with all the
12 tagged motions that were up there. So tagged rules
13 dont apply to a committee whole either when were
14 taking up substantive legislation And thats in
15 essence the ruling
16 SEN. DUNCAN Senator for the reasons
17 that we explained earlier and I think for the reasons
18 that were abated by the Senate and prevailed in the
19 appeal that the tag would not apply the tag rule
20 would not apply to the Committee of the Whole.
21 SEN. WEST Thank you.
22 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Fraser you are once
23 again recognized. You have the floor with regard to
24 laying out Senate Bill 362.
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003910JA_003333
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 57 of 248
1 LAYING OUT OF SENATE BILL 362
2 SEN. FRASER Thank you members. The
3 three-minute rule is in effect.
4 Ive been sitting here for four hours
5 waiting to lay this out. And actually we have a _ot
6 of discussion about how I should lay this out
7 discussion on it. And I think the bill speaks for
8 itself. And I am going to be very brief probably
9 three or four minutes and allow the witnesses to move
10 forward because I think weve wasted enough of the
11 publics time and that we should move forward with
12 hearing from the witnesses.
1.3 Members this bill I think probably
14 most of you are going to be very familiar with it.
15 Its something weve talked about a lot. Someone back
16 a while ago when we were having lunch asked me the
17 question said How did the talk about this bill get
18 started
19 And I actually came back and sat down
20 and Ive got probably interestingly more research
21 and more reading and debate on this bill maybe than
22 one Ive ever done because Im very interested in the
23 concept. But I think probably if you track it back in
24 our nations history is that we look at the ongoing
25 threat of voter fraud that this country has addressed
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003911JA_003334
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 58 of 248
1 really since the start it goes all the way back.
2 And weve got many places where we look.
3 One of them would be Tammany Hall possibly the Kansas
4 City Pendergast machine. Here in Texas we probably
5 should look no further to the 1948 Senate race when
6 the Duke of Duval delivered 201 of the 203 registered
7 voters in Box 13 in Jim Wells County in the race
8 between LBJ and Coke Stevenson. Maybe we refer back
9 to Mayor Richard Daleys Chicago machine in the 1960
10 presidential election where it was alleged that at
11 least one in every 10 votes potentially was a
12 fraudulent or illegal vote and including multiple
13 votes by the dead that continues throughout our Texas
14 history even looking at the activity over the
15 indictments and the convictions over the last several
16 years clarifying that voter fraud not only is alive
17 and well in the United States its very alive and
18 well in Texas.
19 And I think that brings us forward to
20 why were here today. I believe the danger of the
21 voter fraud has threatened the integrity of the entire
22 electoral process for the entire history of the United
23 States.
24 In 2005 I think a lot of you are
25 familiar with the fact that the Federal Election
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003912JA_003335
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 59 of 248
46
1 Commission asked a bipartisan commission and they
2 went out and they tried to get someone to head that .3 from what Ill call the left the former President of
4 the United States Jimmy Carter a Democrat president
5 that had been the governor of a state Georgia that
6 was a Section 5 Voter Rights Act state. They asked
7 him to be one of the co-chairs of a bipartisan
8 commission. Secretary of State James Baker was the
9 other side. That Commission was put in place to look
10 at voter fraud in the United States and come back with
11 a recommendation of how we address that.
12 That commission in you know their
13 reaffirming the danger said The elections are at the
14 heart of democracy. Americans are losing confidence
15 in the fairness of elections. And while we do not
16 have a crisis today we need to address the problems
17 of our electoral system.
18 During that same time the Supreme Court
19 made a ruling in Purcell and Gonzalez stating the
20 Confidence in the integrity of our electoral
21 processes is essential to the functioning of our
22 participatory democracy. Voter fraud drives honest
23 citizens out of the democratic process and breeds
24 distrust of our government. Voters who fear -- and I
25 emphasize the word fear -- Voters who fear their
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003913JA_003336
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 60 of 248
1 7
1 legitimate votes will. be outweighed by fraudulent ones
2 will feel disenfranchised. The right of suffrage
3 can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the
4 weight of a citizens vote just as effectively as by
5 wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the
6 franchise.
7 It hit very close to home in 2003 when
8 we had a member of our body that I served with. My
9 chairman when I was in the House of Representatives
10 Steve Wolens a Democratic House of Representative
11 member and a chairman from the Dallas area in 2003
12 he laid out a bill and made a passionate plea to the
13 Legislature because he believed that through voter
14 fraud that there had been an effort not only for him
15 but also his wife that was the mayor of Dallas.
16 And he says in the bill that he laid out
17 in his appeal Rigged elections in Dallas with people
18 harvesting votes have destroyed our -- he said The
19 ability to cast a vote and have our vote counted is
20 the bedrock of our democracy. We must do everything
21 possible to ensure the sanctity of the vote in our
22 state. And as a society we must not tolerate the
23 disenfranchisement of our citizens any longer in
24 accusing a group in a Democratic primary of rigging
25 the election and harvesting votes.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003914JA_003337
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 61 of 248
48
1 That same Baker Commission theCarter-2Baker Commission in an editorial that President
3 Carter and Baker co-wrote said At the end of the
4 day there is considerable national evidence of
5 in-person voter fraud. And regardless of whether one
6 believed that voter impersonation is widespread or
7 relatively rare there can be no serious dispute that
8 it is a real effect that can be substantial because
9 in a close election even a small amount of fraud
10 could make the margin of difference.
11 In 2005 that bipartisan commission that
12 was created by the election reform recommended that a
13 fair a free and fair election requires both ballot
14 security and access to voting. We as a commission
15 have offered to bridge or a proposal to bridge the
16 partisan divide by suggesting a uniform voter ID.
17 That recommendation came from a former
18 President of the United States had been put on a
19 commission by the Federal Election Commission. The
20 recommendation came because of a concern about voter
21 fraud. And he recommended in 2005 that we develop a
22 program for a uniform voter photo ID. The bill that I
23 lay out today is in response to that.
24 Senate Bill 362 is really pretty
25 straightforward. Its nothing more than when I walk
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003915JA_003338
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 62 of 248
1 in to vote and I lay out my voter registration that
2 that person across from me can recognize that I am who
3 I represent to be that I am that person on the roll.
4 And I feel I have an obligation to represent that I am
5 a legal living person that has the right to vote and I
6 am that person on that roll.
7 Under Texas law today we do not have
8 that ability. Were going to have witnesses come
9 forward today and theyre going to tell you about
10 cases. I have questions that Im going to ask and
11 one of the ones is going to be to the Secretary of
12 State. Were going to ask about if when we go into a
13 voting booth if someone could impersonate me and
14 steal my vote and what they could do about it.
15 And I think a lot of you are going to be
16 shocked at what our current law in Texas is today.
17 Without a doubt there is the ability in Texas from a
18 lot of different directions or a different way for
19 someone to steal your identity your right by your
20 voter registration and can vote identify themselves
21 as you.
22 The Baker Commission -- and Im sorry.
23 Let me back up a second and say one of the other
24 things that youre going to hear today is that we have
25 representatives from Indiana and Georgia. After the
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003916JA_003339
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 63 of 248
1 Baker Commission recommended that the photo ID be
2 implemented one of the first states to do a strict
3 photo ID was the State of Indiana. Theirs is very
4 straightforward. It says that the citizens when they
5 vote will show a photo ID. If someone doesnt have a
6 photo ID the state will pay for it.
7 That law that was put in place actually
8 was in place during the 2006 election and then again
9 in the 2008 election. It has withstood the challenges
10 through the court system. And this last year the
11 U.S. Supreme Court confirmed a decision on the Indiana
12 bill in a majority opinion that was giver by John Paul
13 Stevens which is generally considered a moderate to
14 left-leaning justice. He issued the majority opinion
15 and the opinion was six to three confirming the voter
16 ID bill for Indiana.
17 Since then there have been two election
18 cycles. Im not going to go into the results of that
19 because we have someone from Indiana that is going to
20 testify to that. But I think its going to clearly
21 show that instead of somehow discouraging someone to
22 vote it did just the opposite that the vote total.--23in fact Im going to go ahead you give you those
24 because I think theyre very important.
25 In Indiana over the last two election
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003917JA_003340
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 64 of 248
1 cycles Indiana had the fifth largest increase of
2 voter increase in the United States in the 2008
3 election. In the Democratic votes that were cast
4 they were No. 1 in the nation. They were the largest
5 increase of Democrat votes in the nation even though
6 next door in Illinois where the presidential
7 candidate was from had no photo ID registration.
8 Indiana had a strict photo ID registration. Indiana
9 doubled the increase of Illinois. It clearly showed
10 that there was not a suppression there.
11 Georgia a Section 5 voter rights state
12 they also implemented a strict voter photo ID bill.
13 This last election cycle Georgia was the largest
14 increase in vote totals in the nation. Of all the
15 states of the other states that did not have it
16 Georgia after they implemented their photo ID
17 legislation had the largest increase in vote totals
18 in the nation. And we have people from Georgia here.
1.9 I think probably a brief description of
20 my bill and well get into that. And if someone has
21 questions about 362 and what my bill does but its
22 really pretty straightforward. It just says that when
23 someone goes in to vote they have not only the choice
24 of showing their photo ID drivers license but were
25 also giving them secondary choices and those
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003918JA_003341
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 65 of 248
I secondary choices are a lot of secondary choices.
2 They could show their library card.
3 They could show any government piece of mail that was
4 mailed to them. Basically anything that would show
5 their identification as a secondary source of
6 identification is going to be allowed under my bill.
7 And when we start discussing that Ill be glad to go
8 over the list that is listed of things. But in Texas
9 the bill that we are laying out actually has a
10 secondary choice. Then if someone doesnt have a
11 photo ID there is a secondary choice to identify
12 themselves.
13 I should also clarify that we are only
14 addressing the in-person voting we are not addressing
15 mail-in ballots early voting any of the other things
16 in the election cycle.
17 I think Im going to go ahead and close
18 so we can start either the questions and/or bring in
19 the witnesses. But I think its important to note
20 that in upholding Indianas photo ID law In the
21 decision that was given by John Paul Stevens in his
22 majority opinion he stated Confidence in the
23 integrity of our election process is essential. to the
24 functioning of our participatory democracy. Voter
25 fraud drives honest citizens out of the democratic
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003919JA_003342
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 66 of 248
1 process and breeds distrust of our government. Voters
2 who fear their legitimate votes will be outweighed by
3 fraudulent ones will feel disenfranchised.
4 We believe Senate Bill 362 goes a long
5 ways for correcting that concern.
6 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR
7 SEN. DUNCAN Thank you.
8 Sen. Lucio of Cameron.
9 SEN. LUCIO Thank you Mr. President.
10 For a question.
11 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Lucio.
12 SEN. LUCIO The request was made
13 earlier today to see if we could have the Attorney
14 General here to answer any legal questions we might
15 have on this legislation. As I look around the
16 chamber I dont see the Secretary of State my good
17 friend Hope Andrade who I can -- well who is the
18 Chief Elections Officer of the state as you well
19 know. And Im wondering if she will be present maybe
20 to respond to any questions that the members might
21 have or the Department of Public Safety or any other
22 agency that might come into play with this piece of
23 legislation. Will that be the case
24 SEN. FRASER Ill address the first
25 question first. The Secretary of State I share your
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003920JA_003343
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 67 of 248
i ý.
1 interest in that. And actually when that person
2 comes up I have a lot of questions that I would like
3 to ask also. Unfortunately the Secretary of State
4 Hope Andrade is on an airplane as we speak out of
5 the country. But the No. 2 the Assistant Secretary
6 is here. Coby Shorter is over on the side right now
7 and will be available for any questions that would
8 come up.
9 Actually that is one of my invited
10 persons for questions. I have him scheduled in the
11 mix. But I think any member that has a question of
12 the Secretary of States office would be free at any
13 time for a resource.
14 The DPS I have not personally asked
15 them to be here to testify but I believe probably
16 theyre monitoring this as we speak. And I would
17 suspect if we wanted somebody from the DPS to answer
18 questions about motor voter or any of those issue I
19 feel sure that we could get them over. I have not
20 invited them.
21 SEN. LUCIO Thank you.
22 Mr. Chairman you also mentioned that
23 voter ID proposal for bipartisan and serve the public
24 interest by protecting the integrity of the ballot
25 and you also mentioned the Commission on Federal.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003921JA_003344
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 68 of 248
1 Election reform that was co-chaired by former
2 President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State
3 Jim Baker supported laws that required voters to show
4 a voter ID before voting.
5 I just want to ask you that that in the
6 days after the release of the commissions report Im
7 informed that President Carter and former Secretary
8 Baker stated in an op ed in the New York times that
9 their intent had been misconstrued and clarified that
10 until we have universal registration we cannot make
11 having such an ID be a condition of voting. Are you
12 aware of that op ed
13 SEN. FRASER Tell me where was that
14 SEN. LUCIO That op ed
15 SEN. FRASER What was the date on that
16 Tell me the date on that please.
17 SEN. LUCIO The source is Jimmy Carter
18 and James Baker III Voting Reform Is in the Cards
19 The New York Times September 23rd -- September 23
20 2005.
21 SEN. FRASER And I guess I would
22 defer -- I obviously cant get in the minds -- and by
23 the way we do have someone from that commission here
24 that we can question will be the second person that I
25 will call up. And so youll have the right to ask
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003922JA_003345
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 69 of 248
1 them because theyre from that commission.
2 All I can go by is a newer -- you know
3 everyone has a right to you know their developing
4 thoughts. But the newest thing I have on record was
5 February 3 2008. It was an op ed contribution A6 Clearer Picture on Voter ID by Jimmy Carter and James
7 A. Baker III which Im assuming -- February 3 2008
8 is after September 23 2005. So this would be their
9 more current thoughts.
10 And in that current editorial that I
11 have here in my hand it said In 2005 we led a
12 bipartisan Commission And Im not going to
13 read the whole thing but it says We bridged a
14 partisan divide by suggesting a uniform voter photo
15 ID. And this is February 8 sic 2008.
16 SEN. LUCIO 2008
17 SEN. FRASER 2008. Yours is 2005. So
18 I dont know what to say other than my story is three
19 years newer than yours.
20 SEN. LUCIO Well I guess they changed
21 their minds after two thousand--22SEN. FRASER Everybody gets to change
23 their mind. All I know is that this is the most
24 current thing that I have on file. But that was a op
25 ed contribution to the New York Times February 3
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003923JA_003346
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 70 of 248
1 2008 you know. Im--2SEN. LUCIO Thank you very much
3 Senator.
4 SEN. FRASER Thank you.
5 SEN. WATSON Mr. President
6 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Watson of Travis.
7 SEN. WATSON Thank you Mr. Chairman.
8 I just want to ask a couple of question.
9 And first let me say that I think you
10 and I probably agree that there is not a senator in
11 this room that doesnt want to protect the sanctity of
12 the ballot box regardless of how they might feel
13 about 362.
14 SEN. FRASER I would share we without
15 a doubt -- weve had this conversation -- is that I
16 think we both have the same intent is that neither
17 one of us want voter fraud and we would do anything we
18 could to stop voter fraud in Texas. And I think
19 thats--20SEN. WATSON Nobody wants--21SEN. FRASER I think we agree with
22 that.
23 SEN. WATSON Nobody wants voter fraud.
24 And there may be some disagreements about how we go
25 about that. Let me ask a couple of questions about
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003924JA_003347
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 71 of 248
1 the bill. And first let me mention something about
2 the Carter-Baker Commission. Im not sure there was a
3 change in opinion. But what they said in that
4 February 2008 is they were looking for a universal.
5 voter identification. Is that correct
6 SEN. FRASER I believe the term was
7 uniform--8SEN. WATSON Uniform.
9 SEN. FRASER -- voter ID. And
10 actually what they suggested--11SEN. WATSON Was REAL ID.
12 SEN. FRASER -- is that the federal
13 government would issue a photo ID to every person in
14 the United States.
15 SEN. WATSON And what theyve actually
16 indicated is that in order to be in favor of a unform
17 voter ID they believe that what needs to happen is
18 the government would be in a position to give everyone
19 an identification so that you wouldnt run into
20 situations where there might be discrimination. Is
21 that correct
22 Well for example theyre affirmatively
23 said
--24SEN. FRASER They have affirmatively
25 said that somebody should pay for it the federal
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003925JA_003348
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 72 of 248
9
1 government or the states but they would issue a photo
2 ID.
3 SEN. WATSON So that everybody would
4 have a uniform identification
5 SEN. FRASER Exactly what Im laying
6 out in this bill.
7 SEN. WATSON And I dont disagree.
8 SEN. FRASER I--9SEN. DUNCAN Senators senators--10SEN. FRASER I can answer you. Just a
11 second.
12 SEN. DUNCAN May I interrupt
13 SEN. FRASER Sure.
14 SEN. DUNCAN Youve got a court--15SEN. WATSON Well were both
16 interrupting. Why dont you
17 SEN. DUNCAN Well no. Im just trying
18 to help you out. The court reporter can only type
19 down one person talking at a time and so you have a
20 tendency--21 SEN. WATSON Fair enough.
22 SEN. DUNCAN -- to talk over each
23 other. So if you could observe that rule it will
24 help the record.
25 SEN. WATSON And we do that even in
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003926JA_003349
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 73 of 248
Cv
1 private conversations I might add.
2 SEN. FRASER Unfortunately we are on
3 the committee together and this is a common
4 occurrence so we will have to try to control
5 ourselves.
6 SEN. WATSON I think you were the last
7 one talking.
8 SEN. FRASER The final statement I
9 think they say -- let me read this. Actually its
10 interesting that the last -- this was in -- they were
11 writing this in response urging the Supreme Court to
12 validate the Indiana law. And it says that -- they
13 are suggesting that states should move to implement
14 photo IDs gradually that a free ID should be
15 available. But theyre also saying that the Supreme
16 Court can lead the way on the voter ID issue by
17 validating the Indiana ruling which is the photo ID.
18 And again its the thing I just read.
19 It will move our national leaders and the
20 entire country to bridge the partisan divide on a
21 matter that is important to our democracy. The
22 Supreme Court should support voter ID laws that
23 make it easy to vote but tough to cheat from their
24 editorial.
25 SEN. WATSON And they had indicated
--KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233
TX_00003927JA_003350
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 74 of 248
6
1 Im sure well hear some other testimony about this.
2 But the Carter-Baker Commission had indicated that
3 they believed the way Georgia had set theirs up was
4 discriminatory in part because the government wasnt
5 as you just indicated making it easy for people to
6 be -- all people to be able to get a uniform
7 identification.
8 SEN. FRASER They want it to be easy
9 to -- their suggestion was have a photo ID have
10 someone pay for it make it easy for them to get it.
11 But they say Here is what we want to do. We want a
12 voter ID law that makes it easy to vote but tough to
13 cheat.
14 SEN. WATSON Well lets talk about
15 what the current situation is so that we can be clear
16 on what it is that we would be doing if Senate Bill
17 362 were to pass. Currently we have a form of voter_
18 identification in Texas. And what it is is we have
19 an identifying document that we call a voter
20 registration certificate. Isnt that right The
21 state provides a voter registration certificate to
22 those who register to vote
23 SEN. FRASER The answer to that
24 probably is Yes and No is that the way we
25 currently identify ourself when we go in is a voter
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003928JA_003351
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 75 of 248
62
1 registration certificate. The problem with current
2 law is there is no way that that person that is
3 behind the voting booth knows Are you really that
4 person because -- hold on a second -- you know
5 there is nothing to say that I couldnt pick up my
6 brother Steves voter ID and walk in and lay it on the
7 table and the -- were going to ask the Secretary of
8 State this -- but I think the procedure in law says
9 identify
10 Are you on the list Yes.
11 Is this your correct address Yes.
12 Are you in this precinct Yes.
13 Here is your ballot -- even though Im
14 voting with my brothers card.
15 SEN. WATSON I ought to give you a flag
16 so I know when youre done. But Senator the point
17 is I want to try to set what the benchmark is for
1.8 what is required now when someone goes in to vote.
19 And when someone goes in to vote right now as you
20 just indicated all they have to do is show that
21 certificate. The election officer sees their name and
22 sees that their name is on a list of registered
23 voters and then theyre able to vote. Is that
24 correct
25 SEN. FRASER Well let me ask you
--KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233
TX_00003929JA_003352
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 76 of 248
6
1 the Secretary of State will clarify this. But if
2 youre look in Section -- is 63.001
3 SEN. WATSON It is.
4 SEN. FRASER -- of the election -- and
5 if youve got it in front of you you can read along.
6 It says bring your card registration card hand it to
7 them. They verify Is the name on the card on the
8 list Is Kirk Watson on the card Are they also
9 listed as registered Yes it is. They say
10 Is this your current address
11 Yes it is.
12 This is the proper precinct youre
13 going to be voting in14 Yes it is.
15 Here is your ID sic.16 SEN. WATSON And then you get to vote.
17 SEN. FRASER I mean Here is your--18can I keep going though The interesting thing on
19 this though is Senator that -- let me give you a
20 hypothetical -- and well ask the Secretary of.State
21 to verify this -- is that lets assume that they
22 mailed you your voter registration to your mailbox
23 but your next door neighbor saw them dropping it off
24 and he walked over and picked it up out of box. And
25 he beat you to the polling place. And he walked in
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003930JA_003353
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 77 of 248
6
1 where someone didnt know who Kirk Watson was and he
2 laid it on the table and he said Im Kirk Watson
3 and they went through all those scenarios that person
4 would be given a ballot and would vote for you that
5 put it in the pile. And they would walk out the door
6 and that vote would count in the selection. Now
7 well verify with the Secretary of State that thats
8 correct but I believe thats the way it happens right
9 now.
10 SEN. WATSON And that really wasnt my
11 questions. So let me ask my--12SEN. FRASER Im practiced with a
13 lawyer where you dont answer the question that was
14 asked.
15 SEN. WATSON I notice youve been
16 trying to do that. Lets just walk through what the
17 process is and the change in the law. Currently all.
18 that is required is to show the certificate walk
19 through the way you just did and then you can vote.
20 Senate Bill 362 changes that.
21 And it says that while you would still
22 submit the voter registration certificate and that
23 part is the same it then adds the requirement that in
24 addition to the current standard practice or procedure
25 of presenting that voter registration certificate you
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003931JA_003354
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 78 of 248
1 must also submit either a picture identification or
2 two types of other identification thats listed in
3 Senate Bill 362.
4 SEN. FRASER Senator I guess I would
5 ask you -- Im assuming -- you travel a lot. Youve
6 flown since 911
7 SEN. WATSON Im not sure how that is
8 answering my question. Is that what your bill does or
9 doesnt do
10 SEN. FRASER Im saying that this is
11 going to be a whole lot like -- even if you were
12 getting a library card theyre going to say We need
13 a form of photo identification and theyre going to
14 do -- like they do at the airport theyre going to
15 look at the card theyre going to look at you
16 theyre going to look back at the card and say Yes
17 you are the person that you are pretending or you
18 say you are. You -- Kirk Watson is the person on the
19 photo kirk Watson is the person on the registration
20 files. And the answer is yes that would be the way
21 this would work.
22 SEN. WATSON So the answer is yes that
23 there is an additional requirement so that people who
24 could vote under the current voting standard practice
25 and procedure will be precluded from voting if they
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003932JA_003355
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 79 of 248
6 6
1 dont meet these new requirements. Is that correct
2 SEN. FRASER Im sorry. I was talking
3 to staff. Ask that again please.
4 SEN. WATSON People who could vote
5 under the current voting standard practice and
6 procedure will be precluded from voting if Senate
7 Bill 362 passes if they dont meet those new
8 requirements
9 SEN. FRASER No one is going to be
10 precluded from voting. Everyone that walks in--11under 362 every person that walks in to vote will be
12 allowed to vote.
13 SEN. WATSON If they meet the new
14 requirements
15 SEN. FRASER Every person that--16SEN. WATSON Thats provisional
17 balloting.
18 SEN. FRASER -- walks in--19SEN. WATSON Is that what youre
20 talking about
21 SEN. FRASER Every person that walks
22 into the registration to vote can vote. No one will
23 leave the voting place without being able to vote.
24 SEN. WATSON Let me ask my question
25 differently. If they dont -- if someone walks in
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003933JA_003356
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 80 of 248
6/
I today under 362 -- lets say 362 passes -- and they
2 dont have the new requirements that are set forth in
3 362 they will not be able to vote a regular ballot
4 the same way people today with just a voter
5 registration certificate are allowed to vote a
6 regular ballot
7 SEN. FRASER Okay. If someone walks in
8 and -- I think right now the data is showing the last
9 year of the people that signed up 98.5 percent of the
10 people that registered to vote had a drivers license
11 and they registered that way. So if they didnt have
12 that if theyre one of that one or two percent that
13 did not have a drivers license they have a long
14 laundry list of things that they could use to identify
15 themselves to show that they are in fact who they
16 say they are. If for some reason they didnt have any
17 of that they will be given a ballot. The ballot will
18 be marked a provisional ballot and then we will have
19 the ability then to identify Are they who they say
20 they are So the answer is no theyre not going to
21 leave without being able to vote.
22 SEN. WATSON And maybe I didnt ask my
23 question well and so you didnt understand it. My
24 question is under 362 if they dont meet the new
25 requirements there will be people that otherwise
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003934JA_003357
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 81 of 248
1 today would be able to vote by just showing a voter
2 registration certificate that will not be able to vote
3 a regular ballot. Is that correct
4 SEN. FRASER Everyone leaving the
5 polling place will be able to vote.
6 SEN. WATSON But it may be a
7 provisional ballot. Is that right
8 SEN. FRASER Provisional ballot
9 though once they verify their identification and they
10 show that they are who they say they are the vote
11 counts. So the answer is everyone that leaves wi12 be able to vote.
13 SEN. WATSON Let me ask you a question
14 about the statistics you just mentioned. Do you have
15 any data regarding the racial composition of those
16 people who are currently in Texas that are without a
17 drivers license or other photo ID
18 SEN. FRASER Unfortunately no that
19 data is not I dont think readily available. If it
20 is no one has given it to me. All I can go by is the
21 number -- they gave me the raw numbers of who had a
22 photo ID that was registered in you know the Last
23 year. 2006 is the latest number. And of those you
24 know you had 1.5 percent of the population that
25 registered to vote that it appeared didnt have or
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003935JA_003358
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 82 of 248
1 didnt offer their drivers license up as a deal. So
2 its a very small segment and I dont believe they
3 broke down the racial composition of that.
4 SEN. WATSON Where did that data come
5 from
6 SEN. FRASER DPS motor voter.
7 SEN. WATSON DPS. And how many people
8 would that be
9 SEN. FRASER I may need to correct
10 that. I stand corrected. That came from the
11 Secretary of States office. It was the total number
12 of people registered with a Texas drivers license.
13 Im sorry. I stand corrected.
14 SEN. WATSON Let me make sure I
15 understand the number that youre indicating. What
16 youre indicating is that of the total population
17 thats registered to vote the Secretary of States
18 office is providing data that says 98.5 percent of
19 those have a drivers license
20 SEN. FRASER I dont think I said that.
21 SEN. WATSON Okay. Well thats what
22 Im trying to find out. I want to be clear what you
23 said.
24 SEN. FRASER Okay. Well lets do it
25 again. Last year in 2006 the number of people that
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003936JA_003359
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 83 of 248
1 registered to vote in 2006 that registered to vote
2 that year of those totals there were 2419188 that
3 registered with a drivers license. There were 37490
4 that didnt use their drivers license to register.
5 SEN. WATSON So that would not--6SEN. FRASER So that--7SEN. WATSON That wouldnt be taking
8 into account any long-time voters who might no longer
9 have drivers licenses or have allowed their drivers
10 license to be expired for more than two years or that
11 nature. Is that correct
12 SEN. FRASER I actually have that data
13 too.
14 SEN. WATSON Good. Why dont you give
15 that to me.
16 SEN. FRASER Total number of people on
17 their staff -- now have to keep in mind that some of
18 these people that have been on the rolls for 30 40
19 50 60 years some of this has changed. And so some
20 of them that signed up once they were okayed and
21 identified they stayed on the roll and they didnt
22 have to add it.
23 My mother would be a good example but-.
2.4 she didnt get her drivers license until well into
25 her married life. On her registration form she is
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003937JA_003360
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 84 of 248
1 not registered as showing to have a photo ID but in
2 fact I do know that she has one. The ones in the
3 records that show that they show that there were
4 5601000 that have a license. The ones that neither
5 numbers show up either social security number or
6 voter ID 809000. So in their records its about
7 88 percent of the people in their records give the
8 drivers license as their identification source.
9 Theres 12 percent they dont know about. But in
10 that the assumption is a great many of those now
11 have a photo ID people like my mother.
12 SEN. WATSON But we dont know what
13 that number is
14 SEN. FRASER We dont know for sure.
15 SEN. WATSON And how many people are we
16 talking about when we talk about 12 percent
17 SEN. FRASER Well in the records they
18 have 809041 that they dont have in their records a
19 number registered but they also readily will admit
20 that those records are very outdated because what
21 happens when someone is registered as soon as theyre
22 approved as a registered voter they dont ever have
23 do go through this again. So--24SEN. WATSON Right.
25 SEN. FRASER You cant automatically
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003938JA_003361
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 85 of 248
72
1 make the assumption that theres 809000 people that
2 dont have it. I think the belief -- probably one of
3 the things that we may be having a lot of these
4 questions youre asking that could be answered by
5 other states. Georgia has a very close makeup of the
6 way our population is made up. Indiana is a little
7 different. But in those cases -- I think the
8 registrar of both of those states are going to be
9 here and theyre going to tell you they went throuqý
10 the cycle and identified the ones that didnt have it.
11 And I believe theyre going to tell you they were
12 shocked at how few people didnt have a photo ID.
13 SEN. WATSON Well one of the things
14 that I think we need to be concerned about before we
15 vote on this floor is whether or not when the changes
16 that you propose get made whether or not thats going
17 to have a negative impact on certain populations. And
18 the 12 percent that youre talking about there the
19 800000 to a--20SEN. FRASER The unknown category.
21 SEN. WATSON The 800000 to a million
22 people do we know what the racial breakdown is of
23 that Do you know how many African-Americans how
24 many Hispanics those that speak only Spanish
25 SEN. FRASER Im not advised because I
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003939JA_003362
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 86 of 248
73
1 dont -- at least I dont remember on the -- I cant
2 remember on either the drivers license and/or the
3 voter that it had a place in there to click you know
4 Anglos.
5 SEN. WATSON Are you familiar
6 Senator with any statistical analysis thats been
7 done regarding the potential effect of Senate Bill
8 362s new requirements on African-Americans
9 SEN. FRASER A lot of what Im at least
10 observing you will hear today from Indiana and
11 Georgia two states that implemented it. And theyre
1.2 going to talk about the people that voted in the
13 racial breakdown before they implemented it and after
14 they implemented it and what happened in--15SEN. WATSON Again I would--16SEN. FRASER So I think -- what Im
17 hoping to do is have facts speak for themselves.
18 SEN. WATSON Well and Im looking
19 forward to that. Im saying you though with regard
20 to your bill Senate Bill 362 are you familiar with
21 any data or study thats been done with regard to some
22 sort of statistical analysis concerning the effect of
23 the new requirements of Senate Bill 362 on -- and Ill
24 just mention a couple of populations --African-25American population Hispanic people making less than
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003940JA_003363
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 87 of 248
1 $35000 a year people who speak only Spanish any
2 statistical analysis of the effect of these new
3 requirements on those people
4 SEN. FRASER Well I guess the
5 assumption would be the people in Texas even though
6 were independent were also a whole lot like the
7 people in the rest the nation. Those statistics are
8 available nationwide because we already have this
9 being implemented other places. Were going to have
10 witnesses that are going to testify to that. And I
11 think youre asking a subjective question that we have
12 objective data that is available that the witnesses
13 are going to lay out. Youre asking have I done that
14 The answer is no but I am pulling data from the
15 academics that have done that and have delivered back.
16 SEN. WATSON As it applies to Texas
17 SEN. FRASER Well you assume it would
18 apply to Texas if theyre citizens of the United
19 States. And you know I dont know why it wouldnt
20 apply.
21 SEN. WATSON Well so that Im clear
22 what we can expect to hear is data related to states
23 other than Texas. But youre not familiar with any
24 statistical analysis thats been done regarding the
25 impacts or effects of the new requirements of Senate
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003941JA_003364
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 88 of 248
75
1 Bill 362 on minority populations in the State of
2 Texas
3 SEN. FRASER Actually Senator youre
4 going to hear some testimony from some people from the
5 major cities in Texas and things that have happened
6 and what you know possibly they believe. But I
7 dont know that I can answer your question.
8 SEN. WATSON All right. Fair enough.
9 Let me ask a quick question about funding under this.
10 Can you point me in this bill Senate Bill 362 where
11 there is any provision to educate voters about this
12 change requirement for more identification
13 SEN. FRASER Do you see the section
14 that says Education--15SEN. WATSON Yes I do.
16 SEN. FRASER -- Voted Education
17 SEN. WATSON And tell me -- what that
18 says is that the Secretary of State and voter
19 registrars are going to put it on their website. Is
20 that correct
21 SEN. FRASER Yes.
22 SEN. WATSON Is that the only education
23 thats identified in this bill
24 SEN. FRASER We are anticipating a--25you know were going to have to educate not only the
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003942JA_003365
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 89 of 248
76
1 registrars the poll workers were going to have
2 posting outside of the voting place of the
3 requirements of this. I would assume one of the
4 things that youre going to ask is in Ohio and
5 Georgia both that they had mailers to the voters
6 talking about these changes. Obviously the specilf_ics
7 of that are not included in this bill. But as a
8 member of the Senate and assuming this bill passes
9 that I think I am assuming everyone in this body would
10 be sympathetic that we should include some funding to
11 make sure that voters are educated.
12 SEN. WATSON So you anticipate that
13 there would be some fiscal note to this bill
14 SEN. FRASER Well no. This bill. only
15 has -- it has no fiscal implications.
16 SEN. WATSON And thats because theres
17 no money put into it for any of the things you just
18 talked about in terms of educating voters
19 SEN. FRASER And again if there was
20 education obviously the education depending on how
21 much education it was there could either be no fiscal
22 impact or it could be some. Again youre being
23 subjective.
24 SEN. WATSON All right. Im not sure
25 thats the case but let me make sure Im clear.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003943JA_003366
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 90 of 248
7/
1 Under the current bill theres not any ability to
2 educate the voters about these new requirements other
3 than that it would be posted on the Secretary of
4 States or a county voter registrars website
5 SEN. FRASER We would -- actually--6let me ask a question of staff.
7 Brief pause
8 I think the question youre asking is
9 that every time a registration card is sent out i_here
10 will be an explanation with that registration card
11 which Im assuming youre calling the education part
12 of that. So the answer is yes there will be an
13 education go out when the registration cards are- sent
14 out. So a persons--15SEN. WATSON So if somebody registers
16 newly theyll get that information
17 SEN. FRASER I get a registration card
18 every two years.
19 SEN. WATSON So every time that --what-20youre suggesting is thats going to be -- the
21 substance and sum of the education will be on new
22 registration cards
23 SEN. FRASER And quite frankly youre
24 getting into an area of the technical part of the way
25 this would be administered by the election division.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003944JA_003367
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 91 of 248
1 In the bill we do specify that when a registration
2 card is sent out. All I know is I get one every two
3 years I get a new registration card. It couldnt be
4 real difficult in that to include an explanation of
5 this bill what will be included and make sure that
6 they understand that whenever they show up at the
7 polls you need to do this.
8 So the answer of -- the language of the
9 bill says that is anticipated. Now the actual agency
10 itself that administers the Secretary of States
11 office I think probably would be the one to answer
12 that question.
13 SEN. WATSON And we dont know -- you
14 dont know as we stand here today how much that
15 costs
16 SEN. FRASER What it will cost Well
17 right now we have given them funds to send out that
18 registration card. And if all theyre doing is
19 putting another piece of paper in that registration
20 card I just cant imagine that they cant take care
21 of it out of their regular budget.
22 So I think where youre trying to go--23will there be an appropriation for that -- I dont
24 anticipate that thats necessary. But youre a member
25 of this body. And if you want to recommend that
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003945JA_003368
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 92 of 248
79
1 after this bill passes that if you want to offer up
2 to the Appropriation Committee and talk to Chairman
3 Ogden I think you have every right to do that. I
4 cant speak for the Secretary of State the way this
5 will be administered.
6 SEN. WATSON Well Im just accustomed
7 to when bills come into committee we tend to know or
8 are supposed to know what the fiscal note is at that
9 time so that we dont vote on something only to later
10 have a new fiscal note come in.
11 SEN. FRASER Did you get a copy of the
12 fiscal note
13 SEN. WATSON Yes and it said zero.
14 SEN. FRASER There is your answer.
15 SEN. WATSON Well and what that means
16 is theres going to be little education and well
17 talk about -- Chairman Duncan has made a good point
18 that the court reporter has now been going -- and
19 while you and I may be enjoying our repartee she
20 probably needs a break.
21 So with the Chairs permission and wi_th
22 Sen. Frasers permission Ill be more than happy to
23 yield the floor for the time being so that we can rake
24 a break for the court reporter.
25 SEN. DUNCAN Thank you Sen. Watson.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003946JA_003369
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 93 of 248
80
1 And members well stand at ease for 10 minutes.
2 Well go back in at exactly 250.
3 Recess 242 p.m. to 256 p.m.
4 SEN. DUNCAN The Committee of the Whole
5 will come back to order.
6 Sen. Watson.
7 SEN. WATSON Mr. Chairman Ill yield
8 for other staffs questions so we can move forward.
9 SEN. DUNCAN All right.
10 Sen. Shapleigh.
11 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Thank you Mr. Chair.
12 If I may some questions of the author.
13 SEN. FRASER I would love to answer
14 questions.
15 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Senator you in laying
16 out your basis for filing this bill talked
17 extensively about the Carter and Baker Commission. Do
18 you remember the year that commission -- when they
19 issued their report
20 SEN. FRASER Senator there is a
21 reference in the forward to the report that I believe
22 says 2005. And Im assuming the Commission was formed
23 that year and Im assuming they also issued the
24 report. But Im also going to punt on that one
25 because we have someone from the Carter-Baker
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003947JA_003370
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 94 of 248
1 Commission that is here that if we can get past these
2 questions and get to our witnesses Ive got people
3 that can answer that question a lot better.
4 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Okay. You quoted from
5 their words in an op ed article. And what I would
6 like to do is give you a copy of an op ed article that
7 they put in The New York Times one week after issuing
8 the report so that we can talk about what their
9 intent or what they thought about this report. You
10 have their -- what we just pulled off what Sen. McCain
11 would call the Google an editorial from Jimmy Carter
12 and James Baker themselves dated September 23 2005
13 which was the week after they produced this report.
14 And I would like you to if you would see if Im
15 reading this correctly.
16 This week we issued a report that
17 bridges the gap between the two parties perspectives
18 and offers a comprehensive approach that can help end
19 the sterile debate between ballot access ballot
20 integrity. Unfortunately some have misrepresented
21 one of our 87 recommendations. As a result they have
22 deflected attention from the need for comprehensive
23 reform.
24 Since we presented our work to the
25 president and Congress some have overlooked almost
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003948JA_003371
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 95 of 248
82
1 all of the report to focus on a single proposal - a
2 requirement that voters have drivers licenses or
3 government-issued photo IDs. Worse they have
4 unfairly described our recommendation.
5 Heres the problem we were addressing
6 24 states already require that voters prove their
7 identity at the poll - some states request drivers
8 licenses others accept utility bills affidavits or
9 other documents - and 12 others are considering it.
10 This includes Georgia which just started demanding
11 that voters have a state-issued photo ID even though
12 obtaining one can be too costly or difficult for poor
13 Georgians. We consider Georgias law discriminatory.
14 Are these the same guys that issued the
1.5 report that youre relying on
16 SEN. FRASER And I guess I would remind
17 you that the Georgia law theyre a Section 5 voter
18 rights state and they were approved. As of
19 February 8 2008 of this year I believe they were--20that final appeal was -- you know they ruled with
21 Georgia. And Georgias act -- both was approved
22 through DOJ approved through Section 5 and was
23 approved through the courts.
24 Again I dont -- all the things that
25 youre asking you address several different issues
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003949JA_003372
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 96 of 248
83
I that we have witnesses here that actually know the
2 details of this. Youre asking me from 2005 to get
3 in either President Carter or James Baker or staff or
4 the other 21 members on the commission what was in
5 their head then and what was in their head in 2008
6 when they released the article to The New York Times
7 the guest editorial. I think those would be better
8 answered by our witness that is here that is sitting
9 in the back waiting to testify. We also have Indiana
10 and weve got those Georgia people. Theres two from
11 Georgia that will tell you how this impacted their
12 voters including minorities.
1.3 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Lets go if we can--14do you have the fiscal note on this bill the one that
15 came with our packet Im looking at the last
16 paragraph that describes the costs in this bill and
17 what the anticipated fiscal note might be.
18 SEN. FRASER Ive got it. What are yol
19 referring to
20 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Well when you look at
21 the top it says No fiscal impact implication to the
22 state is anticipated. Is that correct
23 SEN. FRASER That is correct.
24 SEN. SHAPLEIGH And when we look at the
25 bottom after it describes putting up a websi_te which
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003950JA_003373
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 97 of 248
s3
1 would be part of the states obligation then at the
2 bottom it says Based on responses from a sampling of
3 election authorities and county clerks fiscal impact
4 from implementing provisions of the bill would vary by
5 county. Costs would include at a minimum those for
6 printing signs to post at each polling place which
7 would not be significant. Other potential costs would
8 be associated with additional training and posting
9 information to the county website. Again those costs
10 are not expected to be significant. One smaller
11 county response anticipates that the new provisions
12 regarding casting a provisional ballot would require
13 hiring additional staff resulting in a moderate to
14 significant cost.
15 Now my question is where is the
16 training going to be done Who will do the training
17 with respect to those that will administer and enforce
18 the rules that you propose to pass today
19 SEN. FRASER And I will tell you again
20 that we have an expert resource witness that can
21 answer that question that if we can get on with the
22 testimony that the persons we have here I think are
23 prepared to answer that question.
24 SEN. SHAPLEIGH But as the author of
25 the bill -- and your intent is important in
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003951JA_003374
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 98 of 248
1 establishing this -- in this fiscal note there is no
2 money for training at the state level that in this
3 fiscal note its contemplated that locals in a broad
4 verify of the polling places around the state would be
5 responsible for the training under this bill. Is that
6 correct
7 SEN. FRASER My intent of this bill. is
8 to establish a system of voter identification to try
9 to eliminate fraudulent voting and would be
10 implemented by the Secretary of State. The fiscal
11 note to the bill is like we always do on every piece
12 of legislation. It is sent back in. And the fiscal
13 note as delivered back to the members of the
14 Legislature it says there is -- no significant fi.sca
15 implication to the state is anticipated.
16 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Okay. Well lets get
17 down if we may to a Yes or No answer. The
18 fiscal note on your bill says Each county clerk
19 would be required to provide a session of training
20 using the standards adopted by and the materials
21 developed by the Secretary of State as soon as
22 practicable as well. Is that your intent under the
23 bill that you drafted
24 SEN. FRASER I guess I would refer you
25 back to the bill itself. Weve got the training
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003952JA_003375
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 99 of 248
1 section the wording of the bill. If you would
2 like -- Ill read it to you if you would like for me
3 to. But the wording of the bill is the instruction to
4 the Secretary of the State and the counties. And then
5 the Secretary of State would be -- I think its their
6 job to implement. But again the expert witness can
7 answer that.
8 SEN. SHAPLEIGH In your opening in
9 talking about the need for this bill you referred to
10 Cooke County you referred to LBJ and Duval County.
11 Are you aware of and do you personally know Royal
12 Masset
13 SEN. FRASER And I guess I would ask
14 what Royal Masset has to do with Cooke County
15 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Well nothing. But
16 your examples came from other places to lay the basis
17 for the need for this bill. And my question is do
18 you know were you aware that Royal Masset was the
19 political director of the Republican Party for 15
20 years
21 SEN. FRASER Well I guess the fact
22 that I recognize that his name is Royal Ma-say
23 rather than Royal Mas-et would give some indication
24 that I know Royal Ma-say.
25 SEN. SHAPLEIGH So if Royal Mas-et in
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003953JA_003376
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 100 of 248
1 something that was posted on line last time this bill
2 came up who was the political director of the
3 Republican Party if he were to say Anyone who says
4 all legal voters under this bill can vote doesnt
5 know what he was talking about and Anyone who says
6 that a lack of IDs wont discriminate against
7 otherwise legal minority votes is lying do you have
8 any way -- do you have any way of determining why he
9 would say that
10 SEN. FRASER I have no input.
11 SEN. SHAPLEIGH If Royal Masset were
12 quoted in this account as saying In my involvement
13 with over 5000 Republican candidates I have never
14 seen one case of Republicans committing voter fraud
15 do you have any idea why he would say that
16 SEN. FRASER I am not advised.
17 SEN. SHAPLEIGH If Royal Masset said in
18 his quote When voting in America is only allowed to
19 healthy and wealthy people than sic the America I
20 know is far sicker than my mother. House Bill 218--21which is the bill that came up last session identical
22 I believe to the bill that youre carrying -- is a
23 direct descendent of poll taxes and of allowing only
24 white male property owners to vote. In its effect it
25 is racist barbaric antidemocratic and contrary to
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003954JA_003377
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 101 of 248
E3 8
1 everything that made America great.
2 Do you have any idea why a former
3 political director of the Republican Party would make
4 that statement
5 SEN. FRASER No other advice other than
6 to say that the three sources that I quoted in my
7 opening remarks two were Democrats and one was a
8 left-leaning Supreme Court Justice that all make you
9 know comments the other direction. And actually
10 Rep. Steve Wolens commented about the fraud and the
11 voter harvesting that happened in a Democratic
12 primary. So Im assuming people on both sides of this
13 issue have opinions.
14 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Now I think -- I
15 thought I heard you mention the name Karl Rove as
16 one
--17SEN. FRASER I dont think I mentioned
18 Karl Rove.
19 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Okay. Let me ask are
20 you personally other than the hearsay statements from
21 Steve Wolens and others are you personally
22 acquainted do you know of any voter fraud you
23 yourself
24 SEN. FRASER Well the hearsay
25 statements those were actually statements by Steve
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003955JA_003378
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 102 of 248
89
1 Wolens he made -- I think he made those on the House
2 Floor in laying out his bill so I dont think those
3 are hearsay. He represented them as facts.
4 SEN. SHAPLEIGH In connection with your
5 investigation and your desire to pass this bill did
6 you talk to the Attorney General of the State of
7 Texas
8 SEN. FRASER Ask that question again.
9 SEN. SHAPLEIGH In your investigation
10 of this bill as you worked it up did you consult wLin
11 the Attorney General of the State of Texas
12 SEN. FRASER I guess I need a clear
13 question. You know what -- consult is a very broad
14 lawyer term.
15 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Did you talk to him
16 Did you ask him about voter fraud
17 SEN. FRASER I talk to the Attorney
18 General quite often on a full range of issues.
19 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Did you talk to him
20 about this issue
21 SEN. FRASER I have talked to the
22 Attorney General about a wide range of issues.
23 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Did you talk to him
24 about voter fraud and the nature scope and extent of
25 it here in Texas
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003956JA_003379
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 103 of 248
90
1 SEN. FRASER No.
2 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Okay. Were you aware
3 that he did a rather extensive investigation searching
4 for voter fraud in Texas and spent approximately
5 $1.4 million on that investigation
6 SEN. FRASER I guess I would dispute
7 the statement that you just made is that the
8 Secretary of State was giving an appropriation of
9 $1.4 million that they used in the special
10 investigation unit investigation. Within that
11 $1.4 million it came from federal funds that were
12 spent on election fraud. The issues they used that on
13 was the Eldorado YZF Ranch case the Texas Youth
14 Commission the hurricane-related rapid response
15 efforts the market manipulation and penny stock fraud
16 case the ERCOT case the cyber case inaudible
17 unit identity theft public corruption money
18 laundering and election fraud.
19 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Okay. So Im looking
20 at Attorney General Greg Abbotts press release from
21 March of 2006 where he announces In Texas an
22 epidemic of voter fraud is harming the electoral
23 process and its time we rooted it out. Do you
24 recall when he launched that investigation
25 SEN. FRASER I do.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003957JA_003380
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 104 of 248
1 SEN. SHAPLEIGH And reading further in
2 his press release At first glance these might seem
3 to be like isolated events in far-flung towns. Step
4 back and the picture looks just as sinister as it did
5 60 years ago. For example Texas has long been a
6 haven for paid political operatives who target seniors
7 and the disabled to handle their mail-in ballots for
8 them. Many of the cases referred to my office by the
9 Secretary of State fall into this category.
10 Do you remember that press release
11 SEN. FRASER And I think youre going
12 back and addressing the case of the Steve Wolens bill
13 that he filed on the mail-in ballots and I dont
14 think that particular issue has anything to do with
15 Senate Bill 362. My bill relates to the voter
16 identification issue when were investigating--17SEN. SHAPLEIGH Well I--18SEN. FRASER I make reference to the
19 Wolens bill because it is part of the fraud history
20 and voter fraud. But the investigation youre taking
21 about has nothing to do with the bill. were laying o t_
22 right now.
23 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Well here is his press
24 release. Here is the title of it Helping Stamp Out
25 Voter Fraud in Texas. Thats exactly what youre
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003958JA_003381
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 105 of 248
92
1 bringing forward today. Right Is that what youre
2 trying to address in your bill
3 SEN. FRASER Could we get a copy of
4 that Youre referencing something. Were looking
5 through. And for some reason -- is all the
6 information we have. For some reason I cant find
7 that one. We thought we had them all. But Im sorry.
8 I dont have that one.
9 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Okay. This is his
10 press release off of the website when he launched his
11 investigation in March of 2006.
12 SEN. FRASER And Senator out of
13 fairness I dont regularly go to the Attorney
14 Generals website to read every press release that
15 comes out. So Im sorry I dont--16SEN. SHAPLEIGH I understand. But
17 youre bringing a bill and you led this Senate to
18 believe and youre laying out the case for widespread
19 voter fraud in the State of Texas. And weve had to
20 my knowledge in the last two years one major
21 investigation by the Attorney General of the State of
22 Texas. And I want to get into exactly what that
23 widespread voter fraud looks like after that
24 investigation. Thats where Im going. Thats what I
25 want to find out.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003959JA_003382
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 106 of 248
9 3
1 So in this press release hes laying
2 out the basis for widespread voter fraud and he
3 launched -- his investigation spans as you say among
4 other things -- investigating other issues
5 $1.4 million. And by my account here that
6 investigation produced exactly 13 indictments. Twelve
7 of the 13 were minorities nine Hispanics three
8 African-Americans. Thirteen of 13 of the indictments
9 were Democrats. Now do you have any reason to
10 dispute those numbers with us here today
11 SEN. FRASER Yes I do. The exact
12 numbers are 30 suspects 22 that have already been
13 prosecuted.
14 SEN. SHAPLEIGH In terms of the
15 indictments when he brought the indictments--16SEN. FRASER Indictments on 30
17 suspects.
18 SEN. SHAPLEIGH How many of those were
19 minority
20 SEN. FRASER Im not advised.
21 SEN. SHAPLEIGH How many of those were
22 Democrats
23 SEN. FRASER Im not advised. I dont.
24 know that they asked him what their--25SEN. SHAPLEIGH Well do you have any
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00003960JA_003383
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 107 of 248
1 witness here today who can confirm how many of those
2 were minorities and how many were Democrats
3 SEN. FRASER I have not called a
4 witness you know for that. Its possible that -- we
5 have two people from the registrars office in
6 Houston and I know Houston was one of the places that
7 had a problem. And I would suggest that you ask the
8 expert witness from the Houston registrars office. I
9 suspect they probably would have some information.
10 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Well I think this
11 issue of that investigation is the proof that we have
12 of how widespread fraud is in the State of Texas. 1
13 think we have a perfect right to ask those questi_ons.
14 And I want to know if you as a chairman will
15 participate with us in getting a live witness that we
16 can ask about those cases on this floor
17 SEN. FRASER And Im being advised--18let me just confirm.
19 Brief pause
20 Im being advised that the Attorney
21 Generals office is willing to answer your question
22 to clarify the questions you have.
23 SEN. SHAPLEIGH And will that Attorney
24 General bring us with time to review the file on each
25 of these 13 indictments so that we can determine for
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003961JA_003384
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 108 of 248
95
1 ourselves and can effectively cross-examine him or her
2 on the real nature of these cases Will we have that
3 file in time to really do the job we need to do to get
4 at the heart of this massive voter fraud that we have
5 in the State of Texas
6 SEN. FRASER You know I dont think
7 that the indictments on those -- were in a case that
8 the ability to game the system by representing
9 yourself as someone else. Ive got one area of the
10 voter fraud in this that were addressing and it is
11 voter ID identifying that when you walk in for
12 in-person voting you are who you say you are.
13 SEN. SHAPLEIGH In connection with the
14 indictments brought even your number which differs
15 from my number did a single one would a single
16 indictment have been resolved by this photo ID or were
17 they all mail-in ballots or other issues
18 SEN. FRASER I am not advised. My goal
19 on this is to look at the law itself of implementing
20 people identifying themselves for the ability to vote.
21 We were looking at the Indiana law that is a strict
22 photo ID the Georgia law that is a strict photo TD
23 that have been in place Indiana for two election
24 cycles Georgia for the last. And were going to hear
25 from expert witnesses of how that not only didnt
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00003962JA_003385
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 109 of 248
9 6
1 suppress voting it actually increased voting beca..sc
2 it increased voter confidence.
3 SEN. SHAPLEIGH So are you aware of any
4 other investigations other than what Attorney General
5 Abbott has done here in Texas with respect to voter
6 fraud
7 SEN. FRASER Im not advised.
8 SEN. SHAPLEIGH So if we hear from this
9 witness thats going to come here and share with us
10 the nature and extent of voter fraud in the State of
11 Texas and not a single one relates to photo ID will
12 that make a difference in the way you prosecute this
13 bill
14 SEN. FRASER Again were going to have
15 the expert witnesses come forward. But I think what
16 youre going to hear is the case -- or the example
17 that I used with Sen. Watson of someone stealing his
18 identification going and voting and you know
19 representing themself as Kirk Watson and being able to
20 vote.
21 I think what youre going to hear -- and
22 I dont want to put words in the mouth of the
23 Secretary of State or the other witnesses -- but I
24 think youre going to find that it is extremely hard
25 to identify and even harder to prosecute those cases
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003963JA_003386
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 110 of 248
9
1 because we have a huge flaw in Texas law. We have not
2 given them the ability to even identify that someone
3 is breaking the law. And if you cant identify
4 theyre breaking the law then prosecuting that person
5 becomes even harder. So I think the point thats
6 going to be made through the testimony on this isthat-7we have a huge deficiency in current law in
8 identifying voters when they come for in-person
9 voting.
10 SEN. SHAPLEIGH You had mentioned and
11 laid out some statistics on those that have photo 1-Ds
12 in the State of Texas and said that your information
13 came from the DPS. Is that correct
14 SEN. FRASER I dont think I
15 represented anything came from DPS. I think the data
16 we had I represented came from the Secretary of State.
17 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Okay. Are you aware of
18 any other data from Texas with respect to those that
19 hold photo IDs that are of voting age
20 SEN. FRASER Help me with that. I--21SEN. SHAPLEIGH Well for example are
22 you aware of say the Texas Conservative Research
23 Institutes finding -- the Texas Conservative
24 Coalition Research Institute finding that 37 percent
25 of Texas residents over the age of 80 do not have a
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003964JA_003387
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 111 of 248
9 8
1 drivers license
2 Brief pause
3 SEN. FRASER Im not advised. And I
4 dont think unless they called every one of those
5 people they could verify that. My mother is over 80
6 and she still has a drivers license I believe but
7 she votes by mail.
8 SEN. SHAPLEIGH So which is the number
9 the number that the Texas Conservative Coalition
10 Research Institute has for us 37 percent dont have a
11 drivers license or the number that youre bringirq
12 to us
13 SEN. FRASER I dont think Ibrought-14anything forward.
15 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Okay. Thank you
16 Senator. I look forward to another--17SEN. FRASER Youre cutting me short.
18 You told me that I would be here till midnight on your
19 questionings.
20 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Weve still got eight
21 hours.
22 SEN. FRASER Thats enough time.
23 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Were ready.
24 SEN. FRASER Thank you.
25 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Thank you.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003965JA_003388
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 112 of 248
9 9
1 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Zaffirini.
2 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Thank you
3 Mr. President.
4 SEN. FRASER Is this a test to see if
5 really have this information in the books
6 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Yes it is. Im going
7 to ask you questions about Page 218 Line 4 and what
8 its on.
9 SEN. FRASER The book that I shared
10 with you--11 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Yes.
12 SEN. FRASER -- and showed you all. my
13 data.
14 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Its a wonderful book
15 and I congratulate you and your staff for developing
16 such thorough information very impressive. My staff
17 is not happy to know about it however.
18 Sen. Fraser you were the Senate sponsor
19 of House Bill 218 that never made it to the Senate
20 floor in 2007. Correct
21 SEN. FRASER That is correct. I was
22 the sponsor of the--23SEN. ZAFFIRINI Do you know the main
24 differences if any between the bill that you
25 sponsored in 2007 and the bill that we are considering
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003966JA_003389
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 113 of 248
1ti 1
1 today regarding voter ID
2 SEN. FRASER Im going to clarify with
3 staff. I think I know the answer but
4 Brief pause
5 Im being advised that the bill that
6 were filing is very very close. There are very
7 very small changes in the bill.
8 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Well thats what I
9 thought. I looked at the two bills and I looked at
10 the two bill analyses and I looked at the two fiscal
11 notes. But what surprised me more than anything is
12 that the bill that we considered in 2007 had a fiscal
13 note of $671000 in each year over a five-year period
14 but the fiscal note for the bill that we are
15 considering today says No Fiscal Implications.
16 Could you explain the difference in the fiscal note
17 SEN. FRASER Good research. And its
18 exactly the same thing that I -- I looked at the two.
19 I asked the same question. We called about the fiscal
20 note. Evidently in the research of this -- and again
21 weve got an expert witness that is sitting -- or they
22 were sitting right over here the Secretary of State.
23 I think they will answer that. And I think the answer
24 is again I dont want to put words in their mouth
25 but I think in doing more research they found out
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003967JA_003390
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 114 of 248
i ll
1 that a lot of these things are available for them to
2 do within their current budget and it does not create
3 additional expense.
4 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Well I certainly do
5 want to follow up with the LBB to ask them
6 specifically since they write the fiscal notes why
7 such an enormous difference. Its just amazing. I
8 would like the name of the person who developed the
9 new fiscal note. I might want to work with that
10 person for my bills.
11 SEN. FRASER Well as thorough as you
12 are on finance because Ive sat there and watched
13 you and you do a wonderful job in looking at these.
14 And I know exactly the questions youll be asking in
15 Finance and I would encourage you to do that. But I
16 also being a former member of Finance did the same
17 thing asked the questions. And my response back was
18 is that after further examination they realized that
19 this had no fiscal impact.
20 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Ill be asking them to
21 look at some of mine further and see what they can
22 come up with.
23 SEN. FRASER Thank you Senator.
24 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Thank you Senator for
25 that particular answer. But looking at the bill
--KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233TX_00003968JA_003391
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 115 of 248
i v
1 and Senators Watson and Shapleigh touched upon these
2 issues -- there will be some costs to the local
3 officials will there not -- the posting of signs the
4 training will be provided by the state but the local
5 officials will have to engage in a lot of
6 verification participate in that training the
7 posting of signs and development of material or will
8 the state cover that expense
9 SEN. FRASER I expect that is correct
10 is that you know. But that also is not unusual in
11. that the local elected officials any time there is
12 something for notification they do that. And so its
13 not -- Im being told not unusual wouldnt be
14 expected.
15 SEN. ZAFFIRINI There was much
16 discussion yesterday and today and even before that
17 including by Sen. Duncan and Sen. Van de Putte
18 Sen. West and others regarding the need for each side
19 to make a record and then each side those who
20 support this legislation and those who oppose it are
21 making a record for two purposes No. 1 because a
22 lawsuit is expected No. 2 because we will be dealing
23 with challenges before the Department of Justice.
24 Would you agree with that
25 SEN. FRASER You know again youre
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003969JA_003392
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 116 of 248
i
1 projecting some what-ifs.
2 SEN. ZAFFIRINI I thought it--3SEN. FRASER I would suggest that my
4 intention today is not to make a record. Im not in
5 any way trying to develop any kind of record other
6 than trying to inform my fellow other 30 senators that
7 the bill that Im laying out will increase voter
8 participation rather than the people that believe that
9 their vote is not going to count.
10 And so the expert witnesses that I have
11 brought today are the Secretary of State to talk about
12 the fact that weve got a problem the Houston
13 registrar that says that theyve had a problem there
14 in voter fraud. Weve got people from Indiana to talk
15 about the fact that after we implemented this law
16 they had the largest increase in Democratic votes in
17 the nation. Weve got two people from Georgia that
18 are going to say that they had a huge increase in
19 voter participation and theyre going to talk about
20 the minority increases because evidently Georgia
21 had a huge increase because the Hispanic and the
22 African-American voters were encouraged that their
23 vote was in fact going to count.
24 SEN. ZAFFIRINI But what years are you
25 comparing a huge increase from what year to what
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00003970JA_003393
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 117 of 248
7rl A
1 year
2 SEN. FRASER You and I have been in
3 politics a long time and we know that presidential
4 year elections are the comparison. So if youre
5 comparing 2008 you would look at 2004. If you look
6 at 2006 you would look at 2002. In Indiana after the
7 bill was implemented if you compare 2002 to 2006
8 after it went into place there was a two percent
9 increase in the voter participation. All of it came
10 in democratic voters. There were three new
11 congressional people elected in Indiana in 2006.
12 In 2008 during that same election
13 cycle the vote total in Indiana was over double the
14 increase of next door Illinois. They had a 6.7
15 percent increase in all voting. It all came in the
16 Democrat election. They had 6.9 percent in Indiana
17 increase even though Republican voting actually
18 stayed stable or went down a little bit.
19 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Well we looked at the
20 data but we would disagree on the interpretation of
21 the data because we the Democrats believe that that
22 was the impact of President Obama and that it was
23 President Obama who brought out the African-Americans
24 and the Hispanics and the minorities and that he was
25 the motivation and the reason that there was such are
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003971JA_003394
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 118 of 248
0
1 increase in turnout.
2 SEN. FRASER Im glad you brought that
3 up because the good thing is we got Indiana here to
4 verify that. But I think theyre going to tell you
5 that Obama was from Illinois. He was a senator from
6 his home state next door where we had this
7 repressive -- or the alleged oppressive voter ID bill
8 that was put in place. The increase in Indiana was
9 more than double the increase in Illinois which was
10 the president-elects home state that he was serving
11 in.
12 I believe the facts are going to show
13 just the obvious. Not only did they not depress
14 voting those voters were encouraged that their votes
15 were going to count and it doubled in Indiana over
16 what it was in Illinois. So I would love for you to
17 make that case because I think its going to show
18 that just the opposite happened. I think they were
19 encouraged to vote and they voted in great numbers.
20 SEN. ZAFFIRINI And perhaps if the
21 voter ID hadnt been in place the turnout would have
22 tripled or quadrupled. So we dont know that but we
23 will look into it and pursue those issues with the
24 expert voters. Thank you Senator.
25 SEN. FRASER All right.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00003972JA_003395
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 119 of 248
1 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Now going back to the
2 cost of this particular legislation have you
3 considered at all the cost to the State of Texas to
4 participate in a lawsuit to defend a lawsuit related
5 to this particular bill if it passes
6 SEN. FRASER No. And I have -- the
7 answer is no. As you know its part of the
8 legislative process.
9 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Yes.
10 SEN. FRASER Any time the State of
11 Texas is litigated against we have an obligation to
12 defend ourselves. And as you know since youve been
13 in the Legislature -- you have been here a long time
14 and youve seen it multiple times -- and if the
15 lawsuit is filed then the state has to defend itself.
16 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Have you considered at
17 all the cost to the State of Texas to dealing with the
18 challenge that would be issued with the Department of
19 Justice regarding this particular legislation if it
20 passes
21 SEN. FRASER I guess the question I
22 would ask you if youre asking me if Ive looked at
23 the cost I would ask you the question have you
24 looked at if someone lost an election because someone
25 cheated because they misrepresented themself and they
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003973JA_003396
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 120 of 248
7rV I
1 werent allowed to serve -- and one of the things
2 were going to be talking about is there is somebody
3 in this room today that won a very narrow election and
4 would not be here today if someone had cheated on a
5 very few votes.
6 So I guess the question Ill ask you
7 what is the cost of the State of Texas if someone is
8 allowed to cheat that would change history someone
9 else to represent them there is a huge cost to the
10 state in the fact that you change history by rigging
11 an election.
12 SEN. ZAFFIRINI But basically what
13 were focusing on at this point in the debate is the
14 cost related to this particular bill not to history
15 and not to the future but the costs associated with
16 this particular bill. On a related note were any of
17 your expert witnesses brought in at any expense to the
18 State of Texas or the Senate in particular
19 SEN. FRASER Im sorry. Ive got two
20 people asking questions. Please ask it again.
21 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Were any of your expert
22 witnesses for today brought in at the expense of the
23 State of Texas or the Senate in particular
24 SEN. FRASER No.
25 SEN. ZAFFIRINI No
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003974JA_003397
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 121 of 248
108
1 SEN. FRASER Were any of your expert
2 witnesses brought in at the expense of the state or
3 the expense of the Senate
4 SEN. ZAFFIRINI That is my question.
5 SEN. FRASER No. I was asking you
6 that.
7 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Oh I didnt bring in
8 any expert witnesses except one from Austin who I
9 am
--10 SEN. FRASER None of my expert
11 witnesses were at the expense of the state.
12 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Good.
13 SEN. FRASER Let me clarify that. Not
14 unless Coby Shorter is on expense report for driving
15 his car in to the Capitol this morning. I dont think
16 so.
17 SEN. ZAFFIRINI All right. Senator
18 you talked about vote fraud and you referenced the
19 Duke of Duval and something that happened in 1948.
20 Thats a long time ago. You and I discussed other
21 allegations of fraud including one election in which
22 someone apparently bubbled in. The bubbles were
23 erased on ballots that the respective voters had not
24 bubbled in.
25 In other words there were many ballots
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003975JA_003398
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 122 of 248
09
1 that indicated that a voter had not voted in a
2 particular race and apparently someone else went in
3 and bubbled in and in effect impacted the results of
4 the race. In that particular race there were
5 allegations that there were more votes than ballots
6 counted in a recount. But your bill would not have
7 anything to do with correcting that kind of voter
8 fraud that was alleged at that point would it
9 SEN. FRASER If you go back and examine
10 my opening comments I said how did I move toward even
11 starting thinking about this And I reflected that in
12 the history of the United States theres been a lot
13 of cases where there was either voter fraud voter
14 manipulation stolen election voter harvesting that
15 there is a history out there of people attempting to
16 steal elections.
17 I also made the observation that that
18 has moved people toward losing faith in the system.
19 And if they lose faith in the system and they think
20 their vote is not going to count they dont qo vote.
21 That might have something to do with the fact that we
22 have some elections that theres only eight percent of
23 the people that vote because they have no faith that
24 their vote is going to count.
25 Im addressing one small area of the
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003976JA_003399
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 123 of 248
1 law and that is something that I think I can impact
2 and that is when Judy Zaffirini walks into your
3 polling place at home and you put your voter
4 registration down there I want them to know without a
5 doubt that that is Judith Zaffirini that is voting and
6 not Tom Smith that is borrowing her -- or Thomasina
7 Smith borrowing -- it would probably be -- it would be
8 better if it was a woman I guess in the example.
9 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Thats all right. I
10 understand Senator. Dont worry about it.
11 SEN. FRASER If someone else is using
12 your card to vote then I think you need that
13 assurance that youve got to make sure that when you
14 go to vote that somebody has not been there you
15 know impersonating you stealing your ability to
16 vote.
17 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Quite frankly Senator
18 that never ever crossed my mind except in relation to
19 the point that youre making. But never ever did I
20 feel threated in any way.
21 My other question for you is do you
22 have any examples at all of any Texas election in
23 which the outcome was impacted by voter impersonation
24 SEN. FRASER Im going to wait until we
25 have all of our expert witnesses. Theyre going to
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003977JA_003400
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 124 of 248
1.
1 answer questions and were going to talk about the
2 election system in Texas and the ability not only to
3 impact elections but also the extreme difficulty in
4 identifying that someone cheated and prosecuting
5 them.
6 Brief pause
7 SEN. ZAFFIRINI You ready
8 SEN. FRASER Yes.
9 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Senator have you
10 considered at all the questions that many of us have
11 raised -- we who are Democrats we who are
12 minorities -- regarding the impact the negative
13 impact of this legislation on the turnout of
14 minorities specifically African-Americans and
15 Mexican-Americans and specifically in South Texas
16 Have you considered those concerns that we have
17 raised
18 SEN. FRASER Senator actually I
19 considered a lot. And I think -- you know first of
20 all Im going to make a blanket statement I want a
21 large turnout of all Texans and I want a large
22 turnout of minorities making sure that they are
23 encouraged to vote.
24 And again I would encourage you to
25 listen to the testimony of Indiana and Georgia of what
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003978JA_003401
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 125 of 248
1 happened when they implemented a fair system where
2 people were comfortable that their vote was going to
3 count and what happened to the minority turnout. And
4 so the answer to your question is absolutely. T want
5 to make sure that -- I want everyone in Texas to vote
6 in large numbers and I want the minorities the
7 African-Americans and the Hispanics to increase their
8 numbers.
9 And I really believe in my heart that
10 the bill that I am laying out today will do that
11 because I think they are frustrated that their vote is
12 not counting that there are people cheating in the
13 elections and have been cheating for a long time. And
14 if they know that their vote is going to count I
15 think theyll be encouraged and I think more will
16 turn out. So the answer to your question is--17SEN. ZAFFIRINI I certainly have not
1.8 seen evidence of that cheating that youre referring
19 to not in terms of voter impersonation. But I
20 certainly will be interested in hearing if there is
21 any. On the other hand if our experts prove to you
22 that your bill will have a negative impact onMexican-23Americans on African-Americans will you consider
24 amendments to alleviate our concerns
25 SEN. FRASER Well first of all in
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003979JA_003402
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 126 of 248
113
1 response to it I have four different papers from
2 academics around the country that address the issue
3 that youre talking about of the fact that actually
4 the minority -- impact is that minorities will turn
5 out more and its from actual data of whats happened
6 since these laws have been input.
7 Mr. Chairman could I possibly move that
8 these be added or entered into the record
9 SEN. DUNCAN You can do that at this
10 time. I think well have -- those will be Exh hits--11what numbers Well bring them down to the front and
12 mark them.
13 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Thank you Senator.
14 Ive asked you about the negative impact onMexican-15Americans on Hispanics in general onAfrican-16Americans. Have you considered the negative impact on
17 the elderly specifically persons over the age of 65
18 and how they will be able to prove their
19 identification What about--20SEN. FRASER Senator I dont know
21 about you but Im getting close to that range. And
22 obviously I am concerned about people in that range.
23 Im concerned about my mother that is in a retirement
24 center and are there and I spend a lot of hours at
25 the retirement center talking to those people
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003980JA_003403
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 127 of 248
1 asking -- Ive asked them -- you cant imagine the
2 number of questions Ive asked about the way they
3 vote what theyre following -- you know what the
4 habits are.
5 And I think the assurance I can give to
6 you is that first of all the bulk of the people that
7 are over 65 -- some that have stopped driving -- the
8 bulk of those and probably a high high percentage
9 vote by mail. I am not impacting that in this
10 legislation. So everything they have done in the past
11 in the ability to vote to mail stays exactly the same.
12 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Have you considered a
13 possible negative impact on persons with disabilities
14 including those who live in institutions such as
15 nursing homes
16 SEN. FRASER And again I guess I would
17 throw my mother in that category. My mother is
18 wheelchair-bound. I know that just even me trying to
19 get her into my car to take to the doctor is a huge
20 problem. She you know like most of her friends
21 votes by mail and so she is in that category of the
22 disabled. And her voting rights will continue as
23 will all of her friends in the retirement center.
24 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Senator going back to
25 your bill on Page 6 Line 14 of your bill you
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003981JA_003404
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 128 of 248
1 itemize--2 SEN. FRASER Im getting heckled over
3 here. People from the other side are moving over
4 to -- hes trying to implement the egg-timer rule of
5 three minutes.
6 SEN. ZAFFIRINI I see.
7 SEN. FRASER Im for that.
8 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Well on Page 6 Li n e
9 14 of your bill you list types of documentation that
10 you acceptable as proof of identification under this
11 chapter. In 2007 in House Bill 218 which you
1.2 sponsored in the Senate you included a student
13 identification card as proof of identification as
14 acceptable documentation but a student ID card is not
15 included in your 2009 bill. Could you explain why
16 SEN. FRASER Senator could I refer you
17 to Section 6.
18 SEN. ZAFFIRINI What line what page
19 Senator
20 SEN. FRASER It is -- just a second.
21 The reference youre making is the public institutions
22 of higher learning the student ID card is still
23 included. The wording changed but its covered by
24 No. 6 A25 SEN. ZAFFIRINI So youre saying that
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003982JA_003405
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 129 of 248
a 6
1 on Page 6 beginning at Line 8 where it reads a
2 valid identification card that contains the persons
3 photograph and is issued by
4 A An agency or institution of
5 the federal government or
6 B An agency institution or
7 political subdivision of this state youre saying
8 that that would include institutions of higher
9 education and that therefore student identification
10 cards would be acceptable proof of identification
11 SEN. FRASER Yes.
12 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Good.
13 SEN. FRASER Isnt that what that says
14 It says an agency institution or political
15 subdivision of this state. The University of Texas
16 is considered a subdivision of the state. It says
17 that an identification card that contains a persons
18 photograph that is issued by. I think the answer to
19 your question is Yes.
20 SEN. ZAFFIRINI All right. In your old
21 bill -- Im looking at it now -- you have this
22 language -- and in addition to that you specified the
23 student identification card. But so long as you
24 clarify your legislative intent thats acceptable to
25 me.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003983JA_003406
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 130 of 248
1 7
1 But a related question Senator In
2 that section you list many many types of acceptable
3 proof of identification including a certified copy of
4 a birth certificate United States citizenship papers
5 an original or certified copy of the persons marriage
6 license or divorce decree. And finally on Page 7
7 Lines 1 and 2 you include court records of the
8 persons adoption name change or sex change. Could
9 you explain why you included sex change as an
10 acceptable documentation and proof of identification
1 SEN. FRASER I believe were going to
12 punt to the House sponsor. This was the language that
13 was passed out of the Texas House last year. We
14 picked up the bill from an amendment that was added in
15 the House. And as our starting point the legislation
16 that we never voted on last year that we brought over
17 from the House that language is in there. So I guess
18 I would say Im not advised.
19 SEN. ZAFFIRINI All right. And Im
20 sure that you can find out why perhaps and answer me
21 on the floor--22SEN. FRASER Some of it was being
23 inclusive.
24 SEN. ZAFFIRINI -- through the Senate
25 debate.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003984JA_003407
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 131 of 248
1 I do have a related question. Going
2 back to our student identification card that
3 references public universities. But what about
4 students in private institutions.
5 SEN. FRASER Not included.
6 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Theyre not included.
7 Was that an oversight Do you intend to include them
8 at a later date
9 SEN. FRASER The answer to that is that
10 its not an intentional exclusion. The concern on i.L
11 is us not knowing every private institution in the
12 state and the way their IDs are administered. A state
13 institution we have some input and control. And I
14 guess the answer to that is if you have a mechanism
15 for that Im willing to listen. It is not -- the
16 answer is not that were -- were not trying to
17 prohibit. Its just that those particular groups we
18 dont have the ability to at least observe or regulate
19 the IDs theyre putting out.
20 SEN. ZAFFIRINI But to summarize then
21 and to make sure that I understands a student
22 identification card issued by a public institution
23 would be considered proof of identification that is
24 acceptable under your bill. But a student
25 identification card issued by a private institution of
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003985JA_003408
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 132 of 248
9
1 higher education would not be
2 SEN. FRASER As the bill is currently
3 written.
4 SEN. ZAFFIRINI Thank you very much
5 Senator. I appreciate your courtesy.
6 SEN. FRASER Yes.
7 SEN. DUNCAN Before we go to the next
8 questioner let me just kind of clarify the record. I
9 have some -- Sen. Shapleigh -- and I think if youre
10 going to put something in the record you need to
11 identify it. Sen. Shapleigh had submitted Exhibit 6
12 which is the vote tally on the Gallegos motion to
13 appeal the ruling of the Chair. Exhibit 7 is a
14 document The Effects of Photographic Identification
15 on Voter Turnout in Indiana submitted by
16 Sen. Fraser. Exhibit 8 is an article or a document
17 entitled Much-hyped up Turnout Record Fails to
18 Materialize Convenience Voting Fails to Boost
19 Balloting. Exhibit 8. And then Exhibit 9 submitted
20 by Sen. Fraser is The Empirical Effects of Voter-I1
21 Laws Present or Absent
22 I think Exhibit No. -- yes No.--23thats all there are. So those will be in the record.
24 Exhibit 10 is A Report of the Heritage
25 Center for Data Analysis submitted by Sen. Fraser.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003986JA_003409
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 133 of 248
120
1 Exhibit Nos. 6 through 10 marked and
2 admitted
3 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Ellis. Or Im sorry.
4 Sen. Whitmire.
5 SEN. WHITMIRE Thank you
6 Mr. President.
7 Sen. Fraser to clarify a few things
8 that you mentioned earlier you mentioned that. Indiana
9 and Georgia voting occurrence. What year was that
10 SEN. FRASER The Indiana voting the
11 first one was in 2006. The second was in 2008.
12 SEN. WHITMIRE I think I--13SEN. FRASER Excuse me a second. And
14 Georgia was in 2008.
15 SEN. WHITMIRE Well dont you agree
16 that everywhere in the country every state had a
17 greater participation this year primarily because of
18 the popularity of our presidential candidates and also
19 the severe economic conditions Particularly I would
20 focus on Indiana. Why would you use the Indiana
21 increase in voting as an indication of anything other
22 than they were very energized about the selection of
23 candidates and because of their unemployment rate and
24 their severe economic downturn Wouldnt that--25SEN. FRASER Senator youre making
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003987JA_003410
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 134 of 248
it
1 wonderful subjective argument. We have an objective
2 person that is about to testify before us that will
3 give you very clear answers that the Indiana guy
4 knows--5 SEN. WHITMIRE Sure.
6 SEN. FRASER -- what their results were
7 and he knows what the surrounding states were.
8 SEN. WHITMIRE Well I havent heard
9 from him. I can only go by your trying to compare
10 Indiana to Illinois and that you said Indiana had
11 such an increase over Illinois. And I think empirical
12 data would you not agree would show that Indiana or
13 Illinois always has high voter participation
14 What also I would like to ask you would
15 you not agree that Georgia it has been well recorded
16 that the African-American vote this year because of
17 President Obama was a significant increase in
18 turnout So I just really dont know if thats an
19 indication that your new mechanism works so well in
20 those two states.
21 And in fact I would ask you Do you
22 think its even a reasonable comparison -- Georgia and
23 Indiana with Texas -- when you look at our size our
24 diversity our language issues Why would you use
25 those two to indicate what Texas is going to follow
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003988JA_003411
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 135 of 248
122
1 SEN. FRASER You know the great thing
2 about this Dean is that were allowed to bring in
3 experts from those states.
4 SEN. WHITMIRE Were going to listen to
5 them
6 SEN. FRASER We have the person that
7 runs the elections in those states that can answer
8 your question. And I -- you know I think its great
9 that theyre here today.
10 SEN. WHITMIRE Well I assume theyre
11 partisan officials as well. How about elected
12 officials Did I not read your county clerk said in
13 her long tenure as your county clerk had never seen
14 anyone impersonating a voter in your own district
15 Did I not read that correctly
16 SEN. FRASER You know someone reported
17 to me that she had said that she had not identified
18 it. But she also said she was supporting the bill--19SEN. WHITMIRE She supports the bill.
20 SEN. FRASER Just a second. You asked
21 me the question I get to answer it. She said that
22 she supports the concept--23SEN. WHITMIRE Sure.
24 SEN. FRASER -- of voter
25 identification. The question was asked by the
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003989JA_003412
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 136 of 248
12 -3
1 reporter Have you caught someone impersonating
2 someone The thing that she didnt add to that that
3 if the reporter would have asked that Does the state
4 and your office have the mechanism to identify if
5 someone is voting illegally and here would be the
6 example that I would use is that if Tom Smith came in
7 with Bill Whites identification card and Bill White
8 is on the registration roll--9SEN. WHITMIRE Ive heard it. You said
10 it
--11 SEN. FRASER But just a second.
12 SEN. WHITMIRE Youve done that two or
13 three times. Im familiar with that. You used it
14 earlier.
15 SEN. FRASER Okay.
16 SEN. WHITMIRE And that leads me to my
17 question.
18 SEN. FRASER You wanted an answer to
19 the question.
20 SEN. WHITMIRE No. I understand.
21 Youve used about three examples of where someone runs
22 to the mailbox and gets someone elses certificate and
23 then runs and votes. Its the same identical example
24 youre using right now which leads me to a very
25 specific question
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003990JA_003413
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 137 of 248
2 4.
1 Do you not know that that is against the
2 law and its a third degree felony
3 SEN. FRASER Okay. And I would ask
4 you--5 SEN. WHITMIRE What youre trying to
6 address is against the law. And would it make a
7 difference to you and would you still be in favor of
8 your bill if I told you we can enhance that penalty
9 SEN. FRASER Dean I think if we can
10 get past this portion of this that yall are asking
11 me questions that could be asked of an expert witness.
12 We have somebody from the Secretary of States office
13 that is going to clarify Is that possible and is it
14 possible to catch them and is it possible to
15 prosecute And I think youre going to be surprised
16 at the answer.
17 SEN. WHITMIRE No Im not going to be
18 surprised at the answer because Ive been running for
19 office 36 years. Its not only -- Troy would you not
20 agree my duty and your duty as public officials is to
21 prevent fraud but we have a very special reason--22because on the ballot. I have been in barnburners. 1
23 have been in close elections. I have tried to
24 identify voter fraud. And that leads me -- and its
25 never existed in the tough races that Ive been in.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003991JA_003414
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 138 of 248
25
1 And I would suggest can any one of the
2 31 senators document and demonstrate where voter fraud
3 has been an issue in their election I would suggest
4 to you early on perhaps in mail-in ballots we were
5 concerned. But on Election Day there is safeguard
6 after safeguard.
7 But I do agree with you -- and each and
8 every one of us I think would agree -- if we could
9 identify fraud we would want to prosecute. But the
10 interesting thing is Im going to ask you before I
11 sit down give me a recent occurrence of voter fraud.
12 SEN. FRASER Johnny--13SEN. WHITMIRE The cite in Duval
14 County that was the year I was born. Then you cited
15 dead people voting. Would a voter ID have helped
16 those people prevented them from voting Give me an
17 example.
18 SEN. FRASER I hate to keep giving you
19 the answer but youre about to have the registrar
20 from Houston thats about to come up here and testify
21 and theyre going to talk about the dead people that
22 voted. And Im going to show you
23 SEN. WHITMIRE That
24 SEN. FRASER Just a second. You asked
25 a question. Right here in my records Ive got it
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003992JA_003415
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 139 of 248
26
1 here but I had rather wait on the expert witness but
2 this is a dead person that voted in person.
3 SEN. WHITMIRE Were they prosecuted
4 The person that voted them fraudulently was that
5 person prosecuted And if she shows up and she didnt
6 file charges against them we ought to all be
7 outraged. Im just curious. What are you trying
8 to
--9SEN. FRASER Ask that question.
10 SEN. WHITMIRE What are you trying
11 to
--12 SEN. FRASER Ask that question of the
13 witness.
14 SEN. WHITMIRE I look forward to it.
15 This is my concern What are you trying to fix Can
16 you point to a recent fraudulent act that would
17 justify us changing the Senate rules having a specia
18 order not addressing property tax increases highway
19 funding What are you trying to address that is such
20 a high priority
21 SEN. FRASER John this you know--22SEN. WHITMIRE No. Im really serious.
23 SEN. FRASER I know. But--24SEN. WHITMIRE We just went through a
25 historical election
--KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233
TX_00003993JA_003416
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 140 of 248
12/
1 SEN. FRASER Do you want me to answer
2 Would you like for me to answer or do you want to
3 interrupt me
4 SEN. WHITMIRE Yes yes. What are you
5 fixing that would shove everything else aside and take
6 this up today
7 SEN. FRASER This is not rocket
8 science. What I am fixing is the very real Is there
9 a possibility -- of which were going to show that it
10 is -- that someone could steal your registration card
11 and they could go and vote representing to be you
12 and that there is no way to identify when its
13 happening. And once it happens its almost
14 impossible then to prosecute after the fact.
15 SEN. WHITMIRE Okay. Let me ask you
16 this -- and I look forward to hearing our witness.
17 Let me ask you this When you compare Indiana and
18 Georgia are you familiar at all with how they conduct
19 their elections in terms of their poll workers their
20 training their compensation any qualifications to
21 hold an election What are the requirements in
22 Georgia Indiana relative to our qualifications
23 SEN. FRASER Dean one of the great
24 things -- the answer I just gave Sen. Zaffirini -- the
25 great thing about this process we bring in expert
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003994JA_003417
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 141 of 248
128
1 witnesses from those states.
2 SEN. WHITMIRE Yes.
3 SEN. FRASER They know the answers to
4 those questions. My expert witness is about--5theyll answer that exact question that you have.
6 SEN. WHITMIRE Because I think what
7 youre going to find is in these other states they
8 compensate them in a greater detail they have
9 training for them. And we depend on volunteers often
10 our senior citizens. And often we have precincts in
11 Harris County that we literally cannot find people to
12 serve and we actually merge and combine precincts
13 because of the lack of individuals available to run
14 these elections. And then youre proposing an
15 elaborate documentation.
16 SEN. FRASER Dean youre my friend.
17 respect your right to ask this. But the last three
18 persons have all asked the same questions. And my
19 responses have been the same We have expert
20 witnesses that are about to show up that can answer
21 your questions. And I guess I tell you no matter how
22 many ways you ask it my response is going to be the
23 same. I think we need to cut this off and start the
24 witnessing.
25 SEN. WHITMIRE Well I look forward to
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003995JA_003418
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 142 of 248
129
1 talking to the person from Harris County. Andif-2someone fraudulently voted for someone who is
3 deceased I would hope we find out why they werent
4 prosecuted. And I would also -- as we continue T
5 wish you would ask your witnesses for the most recent
6 incidence of voter fraud that theyre familiar with
7 and the outcome in terms of prosecution.
8 Weve had a senator -- Sen. Williams was
9 rightfully concerned about some allegations he had
10 heard. The same question was to him at that moment a
11 couple of months ago Were the people prosecuted T
12 think weve got the toughest Penal Code in the United
13 States 10 to 20 for fraudulently voting for someone.
14 And I think we ought to actively prosecute them
15 because none of us want to participate in a campaign
16 or serve in a body that is governed or controlled or
17 influenced by voter fraud.
18 I dont think it exists. And I think
19 the harm is being done because were not in Finance
20 this afternoon were not dealing with Texas Youth
21 Commissions this afternoon were dealing in fighting
22 something that does not exist. And as it is going to
23 be documented by our witnesses going to create a
24 hardship for thousands of Texans.
25 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Ellis
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003996JA_003419
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 143 of 248
130
1 SEN. ELLIS Thank you Mr. President.
2 Senator I know youre tired. Ill try
3 not to take too long. One question I want to ask you
4 is about the provisional ballot. You said when you
5 first began answering questions from Sen. Watson that
6 everyone would be able to vote no one would be turned
7 away. Now how would that process work if someone
8 doesnt have the forms of identification that are laid
9 out in your bill.
10 SEN. FRASER I believe Coby Shorter is
11 right over here. Hes going to be coming up to visit
12 with you in just a second. He will give you all that
13 data. And I believe our expert witnesses -- and I
14 think I told Sen. Watson that.
15 SEN. ELLIS Well now here is what Im
16 getting at I know youre tired Senator.
17 SEN. FRASER No. Im doing good.
18 SEN. ELLIS The only reason Im asking
19 you this is because youre carrying the bill not your
20 resource witnesses so its not personal. Here is
21 what Im getting at Im assuming the way I read
22 your bill if somebody does not have the forms of 1D
23 you lay out they will be told You can cast a
24 provisional ballot. So here is my question When
25 does that ballot get counted What does it take for
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003997JA_003420
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 144 of 248
13
1 that provisional ballot to be counted
2 SEN. FRASER And when my witness comes
3 up -- that is the Assistant Secretary of State -- they
4 will tell you the procedure that is used for that.
5 SEN. ELLIS Okay. Im guessing but T
6 assume that if somebody does that have that ID and
7 they cast a provisional ballot the burden is on them.
8 The bill doesnt lay it out but I assume the burden
9 is on them to then go home or go somewhere and prove
10 who they are or that ballot will not be counted. And
11 thats what my question was.
12 SEN. FRASER Let me ask you if you
13 were getting on an airplane and you didnt take your
14 ID is the burden on the airport to run to your house
15 to get your ID for you
16 SEN. ELLIS Well here is a minor
17 distinction. I dont have a constitutional right to
18 get on an airplane. Thats a big difference. Let me
19 give you if I might a few other points Senator.
20 You used Georgia a number of times as I guess a
21 building block for this legislation. Is that a fair
22 assessment You were saying that they do this in
23 Georgia Georgia is comparable to Texas
24 SEN. FRASER I dont know that we use
25 it as a building block. I said that they have passed
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003998JA_003421
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 145 of 248
.13
1 a near identical bill. It has passed DOJ. It has
2 passed the court system and been put into law. And
3 theyve had an election cycle. And we have the
4 voting -- the people that ran the election in Georgia
5 here. And I guess I would lay it out that I think th
6 facts will speak for themselves. I dont think Im
7 laying out Georgia as an example I think Georgia is
8 their own example.
9 SEN. ELLIS Well I want to make sure
10 that you and other members do understand a basic
11 distinction between Georgia and Texas. The State of
12 Texas is the third minority -- majority minority state
13 in the country -- new Mexico California and then
14 Texas. Georgias population at best Hispanic
15 population may be 7 may be 9 percent. There is a
16 big distinction between Georgia and Texas.
17 When you came up Senator you made
18 reference to -- I guess giving us a history lesson
19 about voter fraud issues and you mentioned Duval
20 County in particular. And being a proud graduate of
21 the LBJ School and a beneficiary of the great
22 legislation that President Johnson signed into law
23 after an historic march that went on this past weekend
24 across the Edmund Pettis Bridge I want to give you a
25 little bit of a history lesson.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00003999JA_003422
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 146 of 248
133
1 Do you have any idea in what year the
2 State of Texas enacted the poll tax
3 SEN. FRASER Im sorry. Im not
4 advised. I dont have that number.
5 SEN. ELLIS The State of Texas enacted
6 the poll tax in 1901. Do you have any idea when the
7 Democratic Party not just in Texas but in a number of
8 states enacted the while-only primary system where
9 you have to be white in order to vote in a primary
10 SEN. FRASER Still Im sorry. I dont.
11 have that number.
12 SEN. ELLIS 1923. It was not abolished
13 until 1944. The poll tax of course was not
14 abolished until 1966. I want to say that to you
15 Senator because when this bill didnt open up 1885
16 or whenever it opened up there were people who sat in
17 desks these desks in chairs not quite as comfortable
18 as the ones that you and I are sitting in today or
19 standing on this floor didnt have this nice carpet.
20 something didnt have the padding under it. But
21 decisions were made over the history of this state
22 which is why we have to be pre-cleared before making
23 this change or any other one.
24 Now Georgia is similar to Texas in one
25 way. It alone with a number of other southern
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004000JA_003423
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 147 of 248
134
1 states do have to be pre-cleared because of their
2 legacy of putting hurdles in the path of people to be
3 able to vote.
4 SEN. FRASER We recognize they are a
5 Section 5 voting rights state that the two states
6 are you know alike in that way.
7 SEN. ELLIS Are you aware -- you
8 mentioned that the Department of Justice pre-cleared
9 Georgias voter ID plan. You do know Georgia had not
10 one but two voter identification bills. You are aware
11 of that I assume. The first bill that Georgia had
12 was pre-cleared by the Justice Department by someone
13 who is one of your witnesses today by the way a
14 political appointee at the Justice Department. And
15 then the state and federal courts struck it down and
16 then Georgia went back and redid their voter
17 identification law. Are you aware of how much they
18 spent on informing voters how to comply with their
19 voter identification law in Texas
20 SEN. FRASER And again same answer
21 Ive given the last three now youre fourth is that
22 my witness from Georgia is very prepared to go over
23 the details of that rather than you asking me because
24 I cant be an expert on the Georgia law.
25 SEN. ELLIS And only -- as painful as
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004001JA_003424
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 148 of 248
1.3
1 it is to do it particularly with you being my desk
2 mate -- it is your bill -- Georgia spends $500000.
3 Now Im only making that point because you put
4 Georgia on our mind not me. Georgia is probably--5SEN. FRASER I--6SEN. ELLIS -- a great state might be
7 one-fifth one-sixth the size of Texas. They spent a
8 half a million dollars a year to make sure people know
9 the provisions under that law. Senator you made
10 reference to the Carter-Baker Commission when you
11 initially started. Do you know the genesis of that
12 commission Do you know--13SEN. FRASER Were about to have a lady
14 come up here in just a minute that is from that
15 commission that I bet will give us the entire genesis.
16 SEN. ELLIS Im going to ask her a lot
17 of questions. The only reason I raise it to you is
18 sometimes -- not all the time but sometimes these
19 senators tend to listen to other senators
20 particularly the person who is carrying the bill as
21 opposed to somebody who has testified for it.
22 That bill was created that commission
23 was created in part to try and restore confidence in
24 the American electoral system not just in our eyes
25 but in the eyes of people all around the world
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004002JA_003425
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 149 of 248
1 36
1 Senator because of the election of 2000 in which a
2 lot of people think there were serious problems in
3 that election of 2000 and thats why this Commission
4 was established a very bipartisan commission.
5 Even if President Jimmy Carter and
6 Secretary Baker were on different sides in their 2000
7 race they realized when developing nations were
8 saying Yall need to have President Carter send a
9 group down here to monitor elections in America
10 instead of going to developing countries. Do you have
11 any idea who some of the other people were Senator on
12 the Carter-Baker Commission
13 SEN. FRASER I bet were going to hear
14 that from my expert witness.
15 SEN. ELLIS Raul Yzaguirre. I mention
16 that because hes one of the most noted Hispanic civil.
17 rights leaders in the country. I dont mention that
18 to help your side to this argument. Also former
19 Congressman Bob Michel a very distinguished group of
20 American citizens from both sides of the aisle. Do
21 you have any idea Senator how many pages were in the
22 Carter-Baker Commission Report
23 SEN. FRASER I didnt get that quite.
24 How many what
25 SEN. ELLIS 130. I only read -- 113.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00004003JA_003426
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 150 of 248
137
1 was going to say I thought it was 115. If you count
2 the nice pictures in the back--3SEN. FRASER Are you--4SEN. ELLIS 115 pages. Senator do you
5 have any idea how many recommendations there were in
6 the Carter-Baker Commission Report
7 SEN. FRASER I would suspect that the
8 lady coming up from the Carter-Baker Commission could
9 possibly have that information if you asked her.
10 SEN. ELLIS Do you have any idea what
11 the real name of that Commission was
12 SEN. FRASER Im not advised.
13 SEN. ELLIS It was the Help America
14 Vote Act and the Voting Rights Act. Thats what the
15 Commission was created for. Senator--16SEN. FRASER And I would suspect that
17 the recommendations was made for vote identification
18 that increased the voter turnout in Indiana and in
19 Georgia for record turnout they were successful that
20 they encouraged -- Were going to help people vote
21 and they encouraged people to feel more comfortable
22 about their voting rights.
23 SEN. ELLIS But--24SEN. FRASER And I suspect my witnesses
25 that youre going to hear are going to tell you that.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004004JA_003427
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 151 of 248
1 3 8
1 SEN. ELLIS Good try but not quite.
2 You referenced a New York Times editorial a little
3 earlier. Im going to try to be a little more
4 balanced than you were my desk mate in reading your
5 provision from that editorial that op ed by President
6 Carter and Secretary Baker. It was titled A Clearer
7 Picture on Voter ID February 3 2008. Here isjust--8a snippet that I think gives a pretty good--9SEN. FRASER Is that about a snippet
10 SEN. ELLIS -- of both sides of the
11 issue. It says in the fourth paragraph No state has
12 yet accepted our proposal. Whats more when it comes
13 to ID laws confusion reigns. The laws on the books
14 mainly backed by Republicans have not made -- I
15 dont want to lick my finger here and try to turn this
16 page so dont give me a hard time -- have not made
17 it easy for voters to acquire an ID. At the same
18 time Democrats have tended to try to block voter ID
19 legislation outright -- instead of seeking to revise
20 that legislation to promote accessibility.
21 Here is the point that they were trying
22 to make Senator. Out of those 113 or 115 pages if
23 you count the pictures they had a series of things to
24 help Americans have more confidence in their voting
25 system and also to encourage more people to vote
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004005JA_003428
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 152 of 248
139
1 things like say their registration restoration of
2 ex-offenders right to vote states spending
3 significant amounts of money in educating people on
4 how to vote. And Senator the most important part
5 was having a uniform universal form of
6 identification HAVA as we have referred to it a
7 number of times.
8 Sen. Estes my other desk mate here may
9 have forgotten this. But last session you were quoted
10 in the paper as saying It will cost too much money
11 for the State of Texas to comply with the HAVA
12 legislation.
13 What Im saying to you Senator is I
14 dont think its appropriate to pick and choose which
15 parts of the Carter-Baker recommendation their
16 report you want to implement because when you do
17 you dont do justice to it. Senator you made
18 reference to not using this legislation to impact
19 mail-in ballots. Why
20 SEN. FRASER Is this a question or were
21 you
--22SEN. ELLIS Why is it that your bill
23 does not touch mail-in ballots
24 SEN. FRASER Why
25 SEN. ELLIS Yes.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004006JA_003429
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 153 of 248
190
1 SEN. FRASER Well its like a lot of
2 legislation we pass. We fix a piece of the puzzle at
3 a time. The mail-in ballot is a huge problem. It is
4 something absolutely that at some point were going to
5 have to address.
6 SEN. ELLIS Senator--7SEN. FRASER But today Im addressing
8 the recommendation of -- the Carter-Baker Commission
9 recommended that we put in voter photo ID legiisiation.
10 And Im moving toward what other states have done
11 which is Indiana and Georgia that Im taking a baby
12 step today toward that. But I think what Im doing
13 will encourage all turnout but more especially
14 minority turnout in Texas.
15 SEN. ELLIS You made reference to Steve
16 Wolens comment earlier. Are you aware that the
17 reference the comment that you are taking was
18 referring to mail-in ballots
19 SEN. FRASER Absolutely. And I would
20 also remind you you voted for that bill--21SEN. ELLIS Oh I did.
22 SEN. FRASER -- because he had been
23 fraud -- his exact statement was is They are
24 harvesting--25SEN. ELLIS Yes.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004007JA_003430
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 154 of 248
19
1 SEN. FRASER -- votes to steal the
2 election in a democratic primary in Dallas Texas
3 and he brought that forward. And youre one of the
4 persons that voted for that--5SEN. ELLIS Thats correct.
6 SEN. FRASER -- bill as I did--7SEN. ELLIS Senator you--8SEN. FRASER -- to address voter fraud.
9 SEN. ELLIS Are you aware of how a
10 puzzle works
11 SEN. FRASER Im sorry
12 SEN. ELLIS Are you aware of how a
13 puzzle works a puzzle p-u-z-z-i-e puzzle
14 SEN. FRASER Puzzle
15 SEN. ELLIS Yes.
16 SEN. FRASER Well if youre asking
17 maybe I dont.
18 SEN. ELLIS If you take a certain piece
19 of what someone has said out of context Senator what
20 youre doing is distorting what they intended to say.
21 So here is my point Your bill does not touch mail-in
22 ballots. You used a quote by Steve Wolens to try and
23 augment your position. Your bill does not touch
24 mail-in ballots. Most of the cases of fraud that your
25 witnesses are going to talk about are going to involve
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00004008JA_003431
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 155 of 248
n 2
1 mail-in ballots but this bill does not do anything tO
2 touch that.
3 SEN. FRASER Again youre being
4 subjective. Lets wait for the objective testimony of
5 the witnesses. Youre being a good lawyer and
6 projecting what the witnesses might say. And I would
7 suggest probably the thing we should do is listen to
8 the testimony thats given and you will have the
9 right to question them. But I think the witnesses are
10 going to make a very clear case that weve got a huge
11 problem in Texas. Theres a huge gap in Texas law.
12 Theres every possibility for someone to walk in and
13 vote -- Craig Estes could take your voter ID and
14 register himself in Houston in a ballot box that they
15 dont you know know him. And he could register as
16 Rodney Ellis and he could vote for Rodney Ellis. That
17 could happen if you know--18SEN. ELLIS Senator in your mind just
19 based on your best guess do you think that this bill
20 would have a more positive impact on one party or the
21 other in terms of Democrats or Republicans
22 SEN. FRASER Im not going to project.
23 about who might benefit from the passage of this. But
24 I wish you would listen to the results in Georgia and
25 Indiana. And I dont want to put words in their.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00004009JA_003432
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 156 of 248
i43
1 mouth but Ive seen the numbers. The ones in Georgia
2 and the ones in Indiana the increase the greatest
3 increase came in Democratic votes it came in
4 minorities. And I hope -- in Texas my hope would be
5 I want African-American votes to increase in Texas.
6 Thats my goal. And if I can create something for
7 your voters--8SEN. ELLIS This bill is going to
9 increase the number of African-Americans and Hispanics
10 that vote in Texas
11 SEN. FRASER Absolutely.
12 SEN. ELLIS Thats what you believe
13 SEN. FRASER I do believe that yes I
14 do.
15 SEN. ELLIS You made reference to the
16 last election in terms of the turnout increasing. Do
17 you think that that record increase had anything to do
18 with Barack Obama being the Democratic nominee and
19 Sen. McCain John McCain being the Republican nominee
20 SEN. FRASER Let me ask you this a
21 different way. Did Barack Obama run in Illinois and
22 Indiana both Did he run in both states
23 SEN. ELLIS Senator--24SEN. FRASER Was he from -- since you
25 asked me the question I get to answer.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004010JA_003433
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 157 of 248
1 SEN. ELLIS I can--2SEN. FRASER You said was the--3SEN. ELLIS I can assure you the people
4 in Illinois knew Barack Obama was going to win the
5 State of Illinois. I can assure you that.
6 SEN. FRASER Youre saying they didnt
7 feel comfortable voting for him because they knew him
8 SEN. ELLIS No Im not saying that at
9 all. Let you ask you this Do you know what the
10 increase in vote was in Texas
11 SEN. FRASER All the questions youre
12 covering is the same thing that was asked about the
13 last four -- youre the fifth person.
14 SEN. ELLIS 600000 additional votes.
15 SEN. FRASER Were going to have
16 witnesses from Indiana and Georgia--17SEN. DUNCAN Senators youre taking
18 over each other and the court reporter only has two
19 hands.
20 SEN. ELLIS Okay. You all right
21 SEN. FRASER Im going to vacate the
22 premise so you can talk.
23 SEN. ELLIS I think Ive completed my
24 questions. I think Ive made the point. I would like
25 to ask the author of the bill about a historic bill
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004011JA_003434
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 158 of 248
1 that hes carrying that in my judgment would
2 negatively impact minority voters in Texas.
3 SEN. FRASER As you know the way this
4 system works we have witnesses come in they tell
5 their story you get to ask them questions. When
6 thats over Ill close well have a vote. It wi.l1
7 come to the floor. If Im successful once we get on
8 the floor and I lay it out we get to do this again.
9 And I would suspect at some point you and I will have
10 a discussion. But I would like for you to ask the
11 questions of the expert witnesses because I think
12 youre going to be shocked at what they say about what
13 the impact would be on minority voting in both those
14 states what happened and how it would be increased.
15 SEN. ELLIS All right. Thank you.
16 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Davis
17 SEN. DAVIS Sen. Fraser--18SEN. FRASER You didnt get the rule
19 about freshmen
20 SEN. DAVIS No. Im sorry. I didnt
21 get that rule.
22 Laughter
23 SEN. FRASER Ill be glad to accept
24 your questions.
25 SEN. DAVIS Thank you.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004012JA_003435
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 159 of 248
1 Would you agree that the provisions of
2 the Carter-Baker comprehensive proposal are proposals
3 that you are using in support for the legislation that
4 you have introduced on this issue
5 SEN. FRASER Senator I took the
6 information that I read -- I read the report I read
7 what they included in print I read their press
8 release -- I took my highlighter and highlighted
9 things that came from either what they had written
10 down and they put their name on and I repeated and
11 read. I didnt project what I thought Jimmy Carter
12 was thinking or what Jim Baker was thinking. I read
13 what they put in print in that and thats what I did
14 today. There is going to be someone here hopefully
15 if we ever get to that point from that Commission
16 that you can ask that exact question.
17 SEN. DAVIS You made a statement a
18 moment ago that in this legislation that you have
19 proposed you are addressing the recommendations of
20 the Carter-Baker Report for voter ID did you riot
21 SEN. FRASER Say that again.
22 SEN. DAVIS You made a statement
23 previously when you were speaking with Sen. Ellis
24 that you are addressing the recommendations of the
25 carter-Baker Report for purposes of proposing your.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004013JA_003436
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 160 of 248
1.4 7
1 voter ID bill
2 SEN. FRASER I am proposing a voter 1D
3 law and laying it out. I used as a reference a
4 document that is in the public spectrum something
5 that Ive pulled off -- I think off the Internet of
6 that report. I highlighted a statement that was made
7 and I read that statement.
8 SEN. DAVIS And you mentioned that you
9 highlighted not only that report but you also
10 highlighted the editorial of February 3 2008 titled
11 A Clearer Picture on Voter ID. Correct
12 SEN. FRASER What was the last part of
13 that But what
14 SEN. DAVIS You mentioned a moment ago
15 when you had your highlighter out you went through
16 the report the Baker-Carter Report. You also went
17 through an editorial that was written by both of them
18 in February of 2008 and you also made highlights to
19 that editorial
20 SEN. FRASER I highlighted a lot.
21 SEN. DAVIS But you highlighted those
22 SEN. FRASER Well I can get my book
23 out and I can show you what I highlighted yes.
24 SEN. DAVIS Im curious as to whether
25 when you had your highlighter out you highlighted
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004014JA_003437
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 161 of 248
1 this particular statement that was made in their
2 editorial that the groups least likely to have valid
3 photo IDs are women African-Americans and Democrats.
4 Did you highlight that statement
5 SEN. FRASER I am not advised. Im
6 sorry. I dont have that. I did not say that. Did
7 you hear me say that
8 SEN. DAVIS No. Im asking you whether
9 you highlighted that.
10 SEN. FRASER Im not--11SEN. DAVIS Do you remember reading
12 that
13 SEN. FRASER Im sorry
14 SEN. DAVIS Do you recall reading that
15 from their editorial that the groups least likely to
16 have valid photo IDs are women African-Americans and
17 Democrats
18 SEN. FRASER The answer is yes. And
19 again its the question that Sen. Ellis just asked
20 is that it was included in the paragraph above and
21 below. But I think I do remember seeing that in that
22 editorial.
23 SEN. DAVIS Do you recall also seeing
24 their statement that the current crop of laws
25 including those that weve been discussing today
--KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233TX_00004015JA_003438
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 162 of 248
9
1 SEN. FRASER Senator Im sorry. You
2 know I have a hearing problem and Im only getting
3 about half of what youre saying. So if you can--4SEN. DAVIS Im sorry. I will speak
5 up.
6 SEN. FRASER I have trouble -- Im
7 sorry -- sometimes with womens voices and Im just
8 not getting it.
9 SEN. DAVIS I will speak up.
10 Do you call reading in that editorial
11 that they also stated that the current crop of laws
12 are not being phased in gradually and in a fair manner
13 that would increase rather than decrease voter
14 participation
15 SEN. FRASER Im not getting it. Im
16 sorry.
17 SEN. ELLIS I thought I heard my wifes
18 voice. Was she calling me
19 SEN. FRASER My wife says this is a
20 trained response.
21 SEN. DAVIS Would you like me to repeat
22 my last question
23 SEN. FRASER Please.
24 SEN. DAVIS Do you recall reading ire
25 the editorial a statement made by Secretary Baker and
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004016JA_003439
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 163 of 248
150
1 former President Carter that the current crop of laws
2 that are being put in place by states are not being
3 phased in gradually and in a fair manner that would
4 increase not reduce voter participation
5 SEN. FRASER No I do not remember
6 seeing that.
7 SEN. DAVIS You also stated that you
8 read the report and that you highlighted particular
9 provisions of that report in formulating your bill
10 that you have proposed today and your reasons for
11 supporting that bill.
12 SEN. FRASER I dont think I said that
13 at all. I didnt read that report in formulating my
14 bill. The bill that I laid out is very very
15 straightforward. All it says is that when Wendy Davis
16 goes to vote they want to know -- they want to see
17 your picture ID or other forms of identification to
18 verify that you are who you say you are and that--19its not rocket science.
20 SEN. DAVIS When you began your
21 comments on the floor today in laying out your b_i22 you quoted from the Carter-Baker Report as well as
23 from the editorial that I read from a moment ago. In
24 answering Sen. Ellis questions you said you were
25 addressing the recommendations of the Carter-Baker
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004017JA_003440
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 164 of 248
151
1 Report in implementing your proposal for voter ID.
2 SEN. FRASER I dont think I said that.
3 I said -- I think I referenced things that were said
4 in that report. I referenced the Supreme Court
5 Justice John Paul Stevens again a left-leaning
6 Supreme Court Justice that wrote the majority report
7 that validated the Virginia -- or the Indiana law that
8 put in place a strict photo ID. I referenced that
9 that had been done their comments. I referenced the
10 Commission things that they had said. I referenced
11 the bill that was proposed by Rep. Steve WoJ_ens a
12 Democrat in Dallas near your area that was -- or may
13 be in your district where he suggested that with vote
14 harvesting and voter fraud those are all stories that
15 were -- that I had data on.
16 SEN. DAVIS In referencing the
17 Carter-Baker Report I wonder if you came across this
18 statement by them To prevent the ID from being a
19 barrier to voting we recommend that states use the
20 registration and ID process to enfranchise more voters
21 than ever. Do you recall that
22 SEN. FRASER Why dont you ask that
23 question of the expert witness that I have informed
24 the last five Senators that are coming up that 1
25 dont have any idea what she is going to say. She is
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004018JA_003441
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 165 of 248
1 going to be under oath and she would love to answer
2 your questions that youre asking and I think that is
3 where we should go from here.
4 SEN. DAVIS Well for purposes of
5 discussion or furthering our discussion and my
6 questions for you let me read some of the
7 recommendations that Carter-Baker report made.
8 SEN. FRASER Are you going to ask me
9 questions--10 SEN. DAVIS Im going to ask you
11 questions.
12 SEN. FRASER -- or are you going to--13you have the right at any time to put stuff on the
14 record. But you--15SEN. DAVIS Im going to ask you
16 questions.
17 SEN. FRASER -- had asked the Cha_irmar
18 if you could ask me questions.
19 SEN. DAVIS Im going to ask you
20 questions.
21 SEN. FRASER Thank you.
22 SEN. DAVIS States should play an
23 affirmative role in reaching out to non-drivers by
24 providing more offices Thats one of the
25 recommendations in this report. Does the bill that
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004019JA_003442
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 166 of 248
1 you have placed in front of us today on voter ID have
2 an affirmative role for states in recommending that
3 they reach out to non-drivers by providing more
4 offices
5 SEN. FRASER Im sorry. Im not even
6 getting close to following the question youre asking.
7 The bill that Im laying out today says that when
8 Wendy Davis walks into the voting booth youve got to
9 prove that youre really Wendy Davis. Its that
10 simple.
11 SEN. DAVIS And the bill does not
12 include a request of the state that it open more
13 offices for the purposes of obtaining a photo ID for
14 non-drivers it does not include that proposal.
15 Correct
16 SEN. FRASER They can use non-photos.
17 I mean there is no provision right now there is
18 nothing in the bill that every person in the state
19 could not comply with because you can use a piece of
20 mail that had been mailed to you your library card.
21 Theres a long long list of things that you could
22 use. You could even use as your piece of
23 identification the mail that the registrar sent to you
24 for your voter registration. Thats a form of
25 identification.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004020JA_003443
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 167 of 248
1 SEN. DAVIS And Im going to ask you
2 about that list in a moment. Let me ask you another
3 question about what your bill includes. Does your
4 bill include a proposal that the state should create
5 mobile offices for the purpose of reaching out to
6 persons without photo ID to create those photo IDs
7 SEN. FRASER Would you ask that
8 question again please
9 SEN. DAVIS Yes. Does the billthat-10youre proposing include a request of the state that
11 they create mobile offices that would go out into the
12 communities for purposes of helping voters obtain
13 photo IDs
14 SEN. FRASER Were you here earlier when
15 that question was asked by another senator
16 SEN. DAVIS I do not recall that
17 question being asked. I would appreciate it if you
18 would answer it.
19 SEN. FRASER The Secretary of State has
20 been asked to come here. The Secretary of State wi_11.
21 implement this transaction. The wording of the bill
22 that is in the bill is very clear of what we would ask
23 them to do. The implementation of that would be you
24 can ask the Secretary of State please.
25 SEN. DAVIS Okay. But Im asking you
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004021JA_003444
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 168 of 248
15
1 if your bill includes that proposal
2 SEN. FRASER My bill has languagethat-3clarifies that there will be an education program of
4 the people to implement this bill. It lays out the
5 instructions on that but it will leave it to the
6 Secretary of State to implement.
7 SEN. DAVIS Does your bill contain a
8 proposal that would provide the ability for voters to
9 register and to provide photo IDs to those voters free
10 of charge
11 SEN. FRASER Try it again. I didnt
12 get it.
13 SEN. DAVIS Does your bill include a
14 proposal that would allow voters to register and be
15 provided photo IDs free of charge
16 SEN. FRASER The photo ID is free of
17 charge.
18 SEN. DAVIS It is free of charge
19 SEN. FRASER Yes.
20 SEN. DAVIS Who is going to pay for
21 that
22 SEN. FRASER We are advised that--23first of all that there are very few people that
24 would need that is that the bulk of the population of
25 Texas already has a drivers license or a photo ID.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004022JA_003445
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 169 of 248
156
1 And were advised that you know the cost of that
2 would be implemented through -- I guess its DPS. So
3 it is built into the budget.
4 You know I know youre new to the
5 Legislature. But the fiscal impact on the bill that
6 is determined if there is a cost to the state. And
7 they said there is no impact because it could be
8 absorbed in current budget.
9 SEN. DAVIS Believe it or not I
10 understand that fiscal impact is based on whether
11 there is a cost to the state. What Im asking you is
12 if your bill proposes free voter ID cards that could
13 be made to anyone who requests them and whether there
14 has been a cost put to that proposal
15 SEN. FRASER Im sorry. Im getting
16 members people talking to me. Try it again please.
17 I cant hear you.
18 SEN. DAVIS Im asking you in your
19 bill the bill that youve authored the bill that
20 youve laid out the bill that you are standing in
21 front of us defending today is there a proposal in
22 your bill that anyone who wishes to register to vote
23 would be provided a voter ID card free of charge
24 SEN. FRASER The answer is yes that
25 anyone that is a registered voter will be given a
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004023JA_003446
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 170 of 248
1 57
1 photo ID free of charge. So I think the answer to
2 your question is yes.
3 SEN. DAVIS And yet do you have any
4 idea how many people might come forward and request a
5 free voter ID
6 SEN. FRASER I would suggest you ask
7 the Secretary of State that.
8 SEN. DAVIS I will. But Im asking
9 you because its your bill. Im asking you. Do you
10 have any idea
11 SEN. FRASER And Im responding to you
12 that Im going to punt to the Secretary of State
13 because theyre the ones that keep that data.
14 SEN. DAVIS Was that question asked of
15 you by the LBB when they were preparing the fiscal
16 note for your bill
17 SEN. FRASER We didnt talk to LBB.
18 Thats not the process.
19 SEN. DAVIS Okay. Turning to Section
20 63.0101 Sections a and Sections b of your bill
21 would you agree that this list of proof of
22 identification that can be provided to a poll worker
23 includes a multiple of standards that those poll
24 workers could apply
25 SEN. FRASER Do I agree that theres a
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004024JA_003447
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 171 of 248
1 lot of choices
2 SEN. DAVIS Yes a multiplicity of
3 standards--4SEN. FRASER A multitude of choices.
5 That I think is one of the beauties of the bill is
6 that theres a lot of ways that people could identify
7 themselves.
8 SEN. DAVIS Okay. In reading the
9 Carter-Baker proposal was it your understanding that
10 the proposal they advanced was the creation of a
11 universal voter ID that would No. 1 provide more
12 offices for people to receive those IDs including
1.3 mobile ones No. 2 that would allow the registration
14 and free federal ID for anyone wishing to seek one
15 and that there would be much less discrimination
16 against minorities if there were a single uniform ID
17 rather than poll workers applying multiple standards
18 SEN. FRASER Im not advised. I cant
19 speak for the commission. We have an expert witness
20 who will be here in a minute and I will be glad for
21 you to ask her.
22 SEN. DAVIS Would you agree that if
23 those proposals were put in place that it would
24 create costs in implementing such a system
25 SEN. FRASER Again Senator we have a
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004025JA_003448
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 172 of 248
1.9
1 system here where they look at the bill any potential
2 cost to the state. They come back with the fiscal
3 impact on that. And the statement we received back
4 from you know on the fiscal impact was no impact.
5 SEN. DAVIS Thank you. Im going to
6 complete my questions for now in order to give the
7 court reporter a break. Thank you Sen. Fraser.
8 SEN. FRASER Thank you.
9 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Ive got three
10 exhibits.
11 SEN. DUNCAN Members we have several
12 folks who want to talk. And weve been going now for
13 about an hour and 45 minutes and I want to try to
14 pace the court reporter. Before we go to a short
15 break though Sen. Shapleigh had some exhibits he
16 wanted to introduce. So well do that and then take
17 a -- well be at ease for a few minutes.
18 Sen. Shapleigh.
19 SEN. SHAPLEIGH Thank you Mr. Chair.
20 If I could as Exhibits 11 12 and 13
21 respectively the copy of The New York Times op ed by
22 Baker and Carter 05 copy of Royal Massets quote
23 and editorial from the quorum report and The New York
24 Times editorial of 08 all discussed on the floor.
25 SEN. DUNCAN Okay. They will be placed
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004026JA_003449
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 173 of 248
1 in the record.
2 Members have those copies been provided
3 to the Secretary
4 Theyre on their way Okay. Thank you.
5 Members we will take a -- well stand
6 at ease for approximately 10 minutes. Well reconvene
7 at 445.
8 Exhibit Nos. 11 12 and 13 marked and
9 admitted
10 Recess 436 p.m. to 451 p.m.
11 SEN. DUNCAN The Senate Committee of
12 the Whole will come to order.
13 If those in the gallery could be seated
14 and we could have order in the chamber.
15 Sen. West.
16 SEN. WEST Thank you very much
17 Mr. Chairman.
18 Sen. Fraser Im going to try not to be
19 repetitious. Can you hear me now
20 SEN. FRASER If you use the Barry White
21 voice I think were okay.
22 SEN. WEST The Barry White voice.
23 SEN. FRASER You know Ive told you
24 that before--25SEN. WEST All right.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004027JA_003450
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 174 of 248
i. C
1 SEN. FRASER -- that thats your best
2 Barry White voice.
3 SEN. WEST Well I--4SEN. FRASER Ive got your vote. I can
5 hear you well.
6 SEN. WEST Barry was able to -- has
7 been very convincing at times. Can I convince you to
8 pull this bill down
9 SEN. FRASER Now yet.
10 SEN. WEST Oh okay. All right. I
11 want to go through the bill with you. On Page 3 of
12 the bill Line 1--13SEN. FRASER If you would hold one
14 second so I can get a copy of it.
15 SEN. WEST Sure.
16 SEN. FRASER Youre reading from wrat
17 SEN. WEST Page 3 Lines 1 through 4.
18 SEN. FRASER Im not sure ours is going
19 to match up but well try. Page 3 -- where are you
20 referencing Okay. There we go. Okay. Thats what
21 I needed. This is what were used to.
22 SEN. WEST Okay. We talked about the
23 use of identification.
24 SEN. FRASER Yes sir.
25 SEN. WEST If youre going under
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004028JA_003451
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 175 of 248
6 2
1 Subdivision 1 you say one form of identification
2 listed in 63.0101a and if youre going to go under
3 No. 2 you say two forms of identification under
4 63.0101b. And Im trying to -- why the difference
5 between the two types of identification in terms of
6 the number that you have to use for purposes of
7 identification
8 SEN. FRASER Well I think the easy
9 explanation is that I think you know under the
10 Indiana and the Georgia laws they have a strict pnoio
11 ID. Obviously my preference on this would be a
12 strict photo ID.
13 In the language that came from the bi11
14 that came over from the House they offered an
15 exception with two other forms of ID. But since
16 theyre not a photo where you could identify someone
17 I cant speak for the House but Im assuming that
18 option was given so you would have two different ways
19 to identify someone to verify for sure that thats who
20 they were.
21 SEN. WEST So the only reason the
22 requirement for two different forms is in this bill is
23 because thats the way it came over from the House
24 SEN. FRASER The bill was passed in the
25 House in this form and came over. And because it had
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004029JA_003452
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 176 of 248
1 already passed one body in that form and we had not
2 voted on it we made the decision to pick up the bill
3 that came over last year from the House.
4 SEN. WEST And thats the sole reason.
5 Is that correct
6 SEN. FRASER No.
7 SEN. WEST What was the other reason
8 SEN. FRASER The other reason is is we
9 think this is a very fair -- you know its a very
10 fair way is that -- you know I would love to see a
11 strict photo ID bill like Indiana and Georgia. But
12 the bill that were laying out gives a second
13 opportunity for someone to identify themselves which
14 would be a secondary form of identification.
15 SEN. WEST Okay. But again the reason
16 that its in there is because it came over from the
17 House that way and some other reasons. And Im trying
18 to figure out what are all the reasons that you put
19 the requirement for two forms in there other than it
20 came over from the House that way
21 SEN. FRASER Again the goal of my bill
22 is that I dont want somebody to go into the polling
23 place saying theyre Royce West and use your voter ID.
24 I think if you had a photo ID -- both of us are big
25 people -- and if we came in it would be easy for
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004030JA_003453
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 177 of 248
1 someone to identify our features that we are who we
2 say we are.
3 SEN. WEST Yes.
4 SEN. FRASER But if you dont have some
5 form of identification then there is every ability
6 for someone to steal your voter registration--7SEN. WEST Okay.
8 SEN. FRASER -- and go and vote in
9 person representing themself to be Royce West.
10 SEN. WEST Okay. Lets look at this
1.1 right here. So your Section a specifically deals
12 with under that -- Im sorry.
13 SEN. FRASER a14 SEN. WEST Section a under 63.0101.--15SEN. FRASER Where are you What page
16 SEN. WEST Im actually on Page 5 now.
17 SEN. FRASER Okay. Page 5. Which
18 line
19 SEN. WEST Well this whole section
20 starting from I guess 9 -- and Section 10 of the bill.
21 SEN. FRASER Got it.
22 SEN. WEST Everything in there deals
23 with some sort of photo identification. Right
24 SEN. FRASER Yes thats correct.
25 SEN. WEST And everything in Section
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004031JA_003454
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 178 of 248
765
1 b deals with some documentary identification
2 SEN. FRASER I do believe youre--3SEN. WEST Section b is on
4 SEN. FRASER All of a is photo and
5 everything else is an alternate form of
6 identification.
7 SEN. WEST Okay. Now as it relates to
8 section Im still on Page 5 and 6. As it relates to
9 the forms of identification that you have amended into
10 the bill did you make any--11SEN. FRASER Well I havent amended
12 anything into the bill.
13 SEN. WEST Well Im sorry. Drafted.
14 Drafted.
15 SEN. FRASER The bill was filed.
16 SEN. WEST Okay. As filed in this
17 bill. Did you make any determination as to how it
18 would impact ethnic minorities in the State of Texas
19 And if so what did you do to make a determination as
20 to the impact
21 SEN. FRASER The answer Im going to
22 give you is the same answer Ive given now to the last
23 six witnesses is that the way we help determine that
24 was what happened in Indiana and what happened in
25 Georgia. I have invited one person from Indiana and
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004032JA_003455
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 179 of 248
1 two persons from Georgia. The persons from Georgia
2 are a Section 5 voter rights state.
3 And I think those would be very good
4 questions to ask them that if we implement a voter
5 identification bill how did it impact their voters
6 And I think theyre going to tell you that their voter
7 response went up because those people felt very very
8 good -- just a second. Youre about to interrupt me.
9 They felt very good that -- they felt before--10werent comfortable because they were afraid their
11 vote was going to be stolen. But after we implement
12 the voter identification they felt good about it.
13 And voter results for all classes but more especially
14 for African-Americans and Hispanics increased. And I
15 believe thats what theyre going to tell you. I
16 dont want to speak for them.
17 SEN. WEST Okay. And so then we should
18 extrapolate from their testimony that the experiences
19 in a Section 5 state -- Georgia -- and a non-Section
20 state would be applicable to the State of Texas
21 SEN. FRASER Senator my wishes on this
22 and my goal if I could project the absolute best
23 thing that could happen is that the people of Oak
24 Cliff that are in your area representing--25SEN. WEST By the way have you talked
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004033JA_003456
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 180 of 248
167
1 with any people in Oak Cliff about this bill
2 SEN. FRASER That we would have record
3 turnout by the people in Oak Cliff--4SEN. WEST Have you talked to any of
5 the minorities -- Im sorry.
6 SEN. FRASER Have I talked to any
7 SEN. WEST Have you talked to any
8 ethnic minorities about this particular bill Have
9 they had input into this bill at all
10 SEN. FRASER And I dont want to get
11 cute with you but you are an ethnic minority and you
12 and I have had a conversation about it.
13 SEN. WEST Oh no. Im talking
14 about--15 SEN. FRASER So the answer to that
16 would have to be yes.
17 SEN. WEST Okay. Well let me be more
18 specific then. Have you talked to any ethnic
19 minorities that support your bill
20 SEN. FRASER The answer is yes.
21 SEN. WEST All right. Are they
22 Hispanics and African-Americans
23 SEN. FRASER Yes.
24 SEN. WEST Was it an African-American
25 that supports your bill
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00004034JA_003457
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 181 of 248
6 6
1 SEN. FRASER What did you say
2 SEN. WEST All right. Im going to be
3 more specific now. Have you talked to anAfrican-4American African-Americans that support your bill.
5 SEN. FRASER Yes.
6 SEN. WEST Okay. Have you talked to
7 Hispanics that support your bill
8 SEN. FRASER Yes.
9 SEN. WEST Are they here to testify In
10 support of your bill
11 SEN. FRASER Let me think about -- the
12 invited testimony--13SEN. WEST Yes.
14 SEN. FRASER -- of the invited
15 testimony we have an African-American I thi.nk that
16 is going to testify on this bill.
17 SEN. WEST Is that African-American
18 with the Secretary of States office
19 SEN. FRASER Yes he is.
20 SEN. WEST He is a resource isnt he
21 Hes not coming to testify--22SEN. FRASER Did I say that -- I didnt
23 say he was going to testify. I said he was going to
24 testify on the bill.
25 SEN. WEST All right. Now let me go
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004035JA_003458
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 182 of 248
169
1 back to my question. Maybe it wasnt specific enough.
2 Have you talked to any African-Americans or Hispanics
3 that are in support of your bill--4SEN. FRASER Yes.
5 SEN. WEST -- support And will they
6 be here to testify
7 SEN. FRASER Im not advised. I--8SEN. WEST Okay. Have you talked to
9 any African---10SEN. FRASER I havent looked at the
11 list of who is going to testify.
12 SEN. WEST Have you talked to any
13 African-Americans or Hispanics about the impact that
14 your bill will have on their right to vote
15 Let me tell you what Im getting to.
16 Have you talked to any African-Americans Have you
17 done an assessment in terms of whether or not this
18 particular bill and the methods that you are employing
19 will be retrogressive as it relates to the minority
20 voters of the State of Texas
21 SEN. FRASER I think the answer is the
22 same answer I gave you about four questions ago is
23 that I looked at -- and Ive spent a lot of time
24 examining the data of actual voter turnout that
25 happened after the implementation of a photo ID bill
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004036JA_003459
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 183 of 248
170
1 in Indiana and in Georgia. And I have invited the
2 election judges from both states to come and share
3 that with you today and I feel sure that they will be
4 glad to answer your questions.
5 SEN. WEST And based on your
6 observation of what occurred in those particular
7 states you believe that your bill if enacted in law
8 will not have any retrogressive impact on the minority
9 voters of the State of Texas
10 SEN. FRASER I think my bill is going
11 to increase African-American and Hispanic turnout in
12 Texas. I think those people today feel
13 disenfranchised because they feel like there is fraud
14 going on in votes today--15SEN. WEST Well have you talked to
16 any
--17SEN. FRASER Are you interrupting me
18 SEN. WEST Yes. I--19SEN. FRASER Just a second. I get to
20 finish.
21 SEN. WEST But you say you feel like
22 those people. My question is who have you spoken to
23 to come to that assertion that those people feel as
24 though that theres fraud and all that stuff What
25 African-Americans and Hispanics -- have you spoken to
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004037JA_003460
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 184 of 248
1 some to make that assertion in the State of Texas
2 And Ill listen to you now. Ill listen
3 to you now respond to my question.
4 SEN. FRASER I have laid out a bill and
5 researched asked questions about the way people vote.
6 I believe I have a bill that will encourage people
7 that their vote will count and their vote is not going
8 to be diluted by those that cheat. I think that will
9 encourage voters as it did in Indiana and in Georgia.
10 And I believe that this bill is not only
11 good for the people of the State of Texas but Im
12 pretty familiar with the ethnic makeup of the people
13 you represent. And I think this bill will be
14 extremely good for Royce Wests senatorial district.
15 SEN. WEST Well and I appreciate your
16 thoughts. But let me ask you again you made some
17 assertions that you believe that its going to be good
18 for every one of Royce Wests district and ethnic
19 minorities in the State of Texas. You made assertions
20 that this will prevent people from cheating and all
21 that other stuff. And Im asking you as relates to
22 voter impersonation have you talked to anyAfrican-23Americans or Hispanics that said there was a problem
24 in the state that this is a problem in the state
25 Have you talked to any African-Americans in the state
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004038JA_003461
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 185 of 248
1 2
1 SEN. FRASER Without a doubt the
2 way -- and I think after we hear the testimony of the
3 witnesses here and the Secretary of State its going
4 to be hard for you to disagree that there is not a
5 problem and the people you represent are not being not
6 served correctly by the current law of Texas. And as
7 a reasonable person -- which I know you are. I know
8 you -- you know you and I have served together for
9 the last 12 years--10SEN. WEST Oh yes.
11 SEN. FRASER -- and I respect you a
12 lot you know. And I think once you listen to the
13 testimony youre going to have trouble not agreeing
14 that the people you represent will be well-served by
15 this bill and I believe that.
16 SEN. WEST Okay. And you know thats
17 fine. But the answer to my question is have you
18 spoken to anyone
19 SEN. FRASER Yes I have.
20 SEN. WEST African-Americans and
21 Hispanics--22SEN. FRASER Yes.
23 SEN. WEST -- that say that cheating is
24 a problem in the State of Texas that voter
25 impersonation is a problem in the State of Texas have
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004039JA_003462
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 186 of 248
773
1 youve spoken with anyone
2 SEN. FRASER I have spoken to--3SEN. WEST African-Americans and
4 Hispanics
5 SEN. FRASER -- African-Americans and
6 Hispanics--7SEN. WEST In the State of Texas
8 SEN. FRASER -- in the State of Texas.
9 And you know I have spoken to a lot of people in
10 different classes. And the people of this state
11 believe that -- 88 percent of the people polled
12 believe that a photo or a voter ID in Texas should be
13 something we should implement.
14 SEN. WEST Sir but--15SEN. FRASER And of those -- just a
16 second. Of those -- and the number I saw -- and I
17 believe it was 74 person of the people surveyed were
18 African-American that said they believe that we should
19 implement a voter ID in Texas because they are
20 concerned about the--21SEN. WEST Do you have a copy of that
22 study
23 SEN. FRASER Yes. I do have -- we have
24 a Rasmussen study and then there is a secondary study
25 and we will get that -- I will get that for you yes.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004040JA_003463
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 187 of 248
1 SEN. WEST Mr. Chairman I would like
2 to see that.
3 SEN. FRASER I will be glad to show it
4 to you.
5 SEN. WEST So youve depending upon a
6 survey that was done Youre depending upon a survey
7 that was done in order to make the statement that
8 youre making in terms of talking to African-Americans
9 and Hispanics
10 SEN. FRASER No. Im relying on actual
11 data of people that voted this election cycle that
12 didnt vote in the election cycles before because
13 they were encouraged that their vote was going to
14 count.
15 SEN. WEST Okay. And going back to--16and let me make sure I understand your response to
17 this question. Youve said that in order to get an
18 answer as relates to whether or not any less
19 regressive means were considered by you as the author
20 of this bill would have to talk to the Secretary of
21 State
22 SEN. FRASER I dont think I said that
23 at all. I dont think--24SEN. WEST Well and you--25SEN. FRASER We even talked about less
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00004041JA_003464
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 188 of 248
175
1 regressive means. I said the Secretary of State is
2 going to tell you the current state of the law in
3 Texas and tell you weve got a big problem--4SEN. WEST As it relates to regressive
5 means and an aggressive -- a regressive analysis in
6 terms of the impact that it has on minority voters.
7 Who on your panel would be able to answer that
8 question What experts would be able to answer that
9 question
10 SEN. FRASER I suspect probably every
11 witness that is--12SEN. WEST Every witness
13 SEN. FRASER I think so.
14 SEN. WEST Okay.
15 SEN. FRASER I think so. I suspect
16 that -- weve got two personal -- or three personal
17 examples because weve got Indiana and Georgia.
18 Weve got the registrar from Houston that you know
19 you can ask those questions. Weve got the Secretary
20 of States office and then weve got theCarter-21Baker administration -- or the--22
SEN. WEST Does your bill do anything
23 about fraud as it relates to denying people the right
2.4 to vote
25 SEN. FRASER Say it again.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004042JA_003465
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 189 of 248
76
1 SEN. WEST Does your bill do anything
2 about fraud as relates to denying people the right to
3 vote You know there may very well be individuals
4 that come into precincts and -- you know back in
5 Dallas -- because youve talked about it a couple of
6 times. I think it was in 1984 we had a bunch of
7 judges come down to African-American precincts and put
8 up signs basically saying You can go to jail. Were
9 you aware of that
10 SEN. FRASER No Im not.
11 SEN. WEST Okay. This bill does
12 nothing about that type of behavior though. Right
13 SEN. FRASER This bill--14SEN. WEST Okay.
15 SEN. FRASER -- is reallystraight-16forward Senator. This only addresses one narrow part
17 of the election code and that is the fact that when
18 you walk into that voting place youre going to
19 identify that when you vote as Royce West they are
20 verify you are who you say you are.
21 SEN. WEST Those poll workers how much
22 do we pay poll workers Senator
23 SEN. FRASER Im not advised but I bet
24 the Secretary of State knows.
25 SEN. WEST Okay. And so those poll
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004043JA_003466
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 190 of 248
1 workers will make that determination -- right -- as
2 to whether or not a person has the proper
3 identification Let me ask you this Lets say that
4 Troy Frasers name was misspelled on the voter
5 registration list and you came in with your drivers
6 license and its correctly spelled. What would happen
7 in that circumstance
8 SEN. FRASER And again Im going to
9 punt to the Secretary of State that they would make
10 the determination. But I think likely the easy answer
11 is is that there is a system today under current law
12 for a determination of that that -- and Ill give you
13 this example. Im not real good about taking my voter
14 registration card. I usually take my drivers license
15 in. And if they had me on the rolls as F-r-a-z-e-r
16 and my drivers license says F-r-a-s-e-rthere is a
17 provision today under current law to manage that. 1
18 bet you that the--19SEN. WEST I do the same thing. I
20 normally just take my drivers license in.
21 SEN. FRASER Well but theres--22SEN. WEST And some people just take a
23 utility bill in.
24 SEN. FRASER And the answer to your.
25 question is Im not addressing that. That is
--KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233TX_00004044JA_003467
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 191 of 248
1 under current law the Secretary of State has the
2 ability to address that. And I think the answer is
3 that if they cant determine your exact -- you know
4 who you are they could provide a provisional ballot
5 do their research find out you are okay and then let
6 you vote.
7 SEN. WEST And I think thats exactly
8 the way that it plays out. But as it relates to
9 provisional ballots -- and I think Sen. Ellis raised
10 this question a few moments ago. What happens in that.
11 circumstances You have a poll worker make a
12 determination that Fraser is spelled wrong you do the
13 affidavit you do a provisional ballot. When is that
14 ballot counted under your bill
15 SEN. FRASER The Secretary of Stare--16I mean--17
SEN. WEST The Secretary of States
18 office
19 SEN. FRASER -- will be glad to answer
20 that for you.
21 SEN. WEST Okay. Thats fair. Okay.
22 Thank you very much Sen. Fraser.
23 SEN. FRASER Thank you.
24 SEN. DUNCAN I will remind the members
25 that we still have invited testimony numerous
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004045JA_003468
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 192 of 248
1 7 9
1 witnesses and then also public testimony who have
2 been waiting here today to testify.
3 So well move now -- Sen. Hinojosa
4 youre recognized.
5 SEN. HINOJOSA Thank you
6 Mr. President.
7 Sen. Fraser
8 SEN. FRASER Im sorry Senator I
9 didnt hear him introduce you. Ill be glad to answer
10 your questions.
11 SEN. HINOJOSA I only have a few
12 questions for you.
13 SEN. FRASER And Senator Im sorry.
14 Let me get my head piece. I can already anticipate
15 Im going to have trouble hearing you. Just a second.
16 Brief pause
17 Are you there
18 SEN. HINOJOSA Yes sir.
19 SEN. FRASER Do a little mike test. 1t.
20 still is not working.
21 Can you give me a mike test One two
22 three four five.
23 SEN. HINOJOSA Is it working now Can
24 you hear me
25 SEN. FRASER No its not working.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004046JA_003469
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 193 of 248
180
1 Brief pause
2 Senator lets try that one.
3 SEN. HINOJOSA Okay. Can you hear me
4 now
5 SEN. FRASER Ive got you now. Thanks.
6 SEN. HINOJOSA Okay. Thank you
7 Senator.
8 SEN. FRASER Im--9SEN. HINOJOSA I just have a few
10 questions and they deal more with the process and
11 trying to identify people who come to vote with a
12 photo ID identification. What type of training will
13 poll watchers have in order to determine whether or
14 not a photo ID is valid or a fraud
_15 SEN. FRASER Senator I dont want to
16 be cute or cut you off but thats the same question
17 the last seven people have asked. And the Secretary
18 of State has been invited here to answer that
19 question and they can answer it a lot better than I
20 can.
21 SEN. HINOJOSA Well but in your
22 legislation do you have provisions to provide some
23 type of detection equipment to be able to tell whether
24 or not a photo ID is fake
25 SEN. FRASER My bill is very
straight-KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233TX_00004047JA_003470
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 194 of 248
181
1 forward in what will be required to identify. But the
2 implementation of that and the training of the people
3 will be left up to the Secretary of State. And I
4 would bet you the Secretary of State would love to
5 answer your question on that.
6 SEN. HINOJOSA Well let me follow up
7 again. You know its very easy to get a fake ID at
8 the flea markets and pay 20 bucks for them. And my
9 question is if you dont provide any legislation for
10 any type of equipment to be able to detect whether or
11 not that is a fake ID then it defeats the whole
12 purpose of your legislation.
13 SEN. FRASER And Senator I think you
14 have just made my case for me. Thats the exact
15 reason that were doing this bill is that there are
16 people out there unscrupulous people doing exactly
17 what you just said that they are taking
18 identification of the people you represent and they
19 are going and fraudulently voting and that we dont
20 have the ability to either recognize that they have
21 done that or to prosecute them after they have. Thank
22 you for bringing that up.
23 SEN. HINOJOSA Senator thats not the
24 question that I asked. Thats not what I asked. I
25 said do you have provisions in your legislation to
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004048JA_003471
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 195 of 248
1E32
1 provide the funding for the local precincts to
2 purchase equipment to be able to detect whether or not
3 a photo ID is a fake
4 SEN. FRASER Senator Im sorry.
5 Did you get another head thing
6 Senator lets try it one more time.
7 Would you ask that question again please.
8 SEN. HINOJOSA Can you hear me
9 SEN. FRASER This receiver is a had
10 receiver. Im getting nothing but interference.
11 Can somebody get one of these that
12 works
13 Let me try without it.
14 SEN. HINOJOSA Okay.
15 SEN. FRASER Where is Lucios
16 Go ahead.
17 SEN. HINOJOSA I will repeat my
18 question Sen. Fraser. And what Im asking is whether
19 or not in your legislation you have provisions to fund
20 the detection equipment that will be able to tell
21 whether or not an ID is a fake one
22 SEN. FRASER Senator again I think
23 that would be a question of the Secretary of State is
24 that -- I think you could ask him how theyre going to
25 do it. But we -- as you know the way this works
--KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233TX_00004049JA_003472
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 196 of 248
183
1 you have been here like I have a long time -- we lay
2 this legislation out. They come back with a fiscal
3 note of the impact to the state. They said there is
4 no impact to the state that they have sufficient
5 money within their budget to handle it. And I would
6 suggest you ask that question of the Secretary of
7 State.
8 SEN. HINOJOSA Well I think that its
9 very important that you have provisions in your
10 legislation to deal with this issue. When you travel
11 by airplane by air as you well know they scan your
12 drivers license and they can tell whether or not its
13 a fake drivers license. And what Im asking of you
14 is whether or not you have provisions in your
15 legislation to deal with fake IDs from the flea
16 market for example I guess not.
17 SEN. FRASER I dont want to dodge your
18 question.
19 SEN. HINOJOSA But you are.
20 SEN. FRASER But youre asking a
21 question that is a technical question of the agency.
22 And again I dont want to speak for my witnesses.
23 But the guy thats going to speak from Houston
24 Houston is in fact using that exact same thing right.
25 now. So in some areas its already in place.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004050JA_003473
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 197 of 248
181
1 SEN. HINOJOSA Well think about this
2 How many precincts do we have here in the State of
3 Texas And if we are going to check on IDs and
4 whether or not theyre fake you need to have the
5 proper equipment in place. How much are they going to
6 cost and who is going to pay for it
7 SEN. FRASER Senator you need to ask
8 the Secretary of State. And you know that is a
9 technical question that the agency is going to have ro
10 answer.
11 SEN. HINOJOSA Well I guess the real
12 answer it may be an unfunded mandate on the counties.
13 SEN. FRASER Well I dont think
14 theres something in the bill that places a mandate on
15 them to buy equipment for that. You know I would
16 suspect that there is a system within the DPS to help
17 identify that. And I think -- I dont want toover-18project but I suspect that between the Secretary of
19 States office and in the counties that there is a
20 system that if you input a number that they can tell
21 whether theyre a real number or not. And Im sorry.
22 Youre getting into an area that I dont have
23 expertise in.
24 SEN. HINOJOSA Well I think its very
25 important to have some provisions in your legislation
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004051JA_003474
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 198 of 248
185
1 dealing with this issue because otherwise there is
2 no way that you can have a poll worker know whether or
3 not a photo ID is a fake one or not.
4 Let me also ask another question. Have
5 you considered how much longer it would take for
6 voters to vote where the lines would be longer and it
7 would discourage people to vote
8 SEN. FRASER Why dont you ask that of
9 the Indiana and the Georgia people. They just went
10 through two election cycles in Indiana one in
11 Georgia. They have already done this. That would be
12 an excellent question for them.
13 SEN. HINOJOSA But Sen Fraser you are
14 the one carrying the legislation not them.
15 SEN. FRASER And thats the reason I
16 invited expert witnesses in of people that have
17 already put this in place. The advantage weve got is
18 that were not reinventing the wheel on that. We car
19 find out their information of what happened.
20 SEN. HINOJOSA Well I think your bil._l.
21 really needs a lot of work. It has a lot of
22 shortcomings with it in the way its going to be
23 implemented.
24 And thank you for answering my
25 questions.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004052JA_003475
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 199 of 248
186
1 SEN. FRASER Thank you.
2 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Uresti.
3 SEN. URESTI Thank you Mr. President.
4 Sen. Fraser I just have a few
5 questions. I know its been a long day but I would
6 like to ask a few questions more specific to my
7 district.
8 But as a backdrop to my questions riot
9 only to you but to the witnesses that youve been
10 referencing all day you have probably heard me speak
11 to this session my senatorial district is the largest
12 geographical district in Texas.
13 SEN. FRASER I know your district well.
14 Theres a lot of it that I used to represent so Im
15 very familiar with it.
16 SEN. URESTI And its actually larger
17 than about 24 states in the country.
18 SEN. FRASER Its a great district
19 good people.
20 SEN. URESTI It is a beautiful
21 district. And one of the reasons I stand today to ask
22 you these questions is I represent the constituents
23 of my district. In addition to being the largest
24 district in Texas its also the second poorest
25 district in Texas. The per capita income the average
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004053JA_003476
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 200 of 248
187
1 per capita for my constituents is $12484 per year.
2 SEN. FRASER Are you aware of the fact
3 that just right below right above that is the
4 district that I represent And so we have a lot in
5 common in the people that I represent and the people
6 you represent because our districts touch. And a lot
7 of the people that you represent now are people that I
8 used to. So we have a very like district.
9 SEN. URESTI And even more reason why T
10 think you will appreciate the questions that I have of
11 you Sen. Fraser. In my district the poverty rate is
12 approximately 24 percent. So when you couple the
13 poverty rate with the vast area of my district you
14 see the challenges that my constituents face.
15 And I tell you that because when we talk
16 about photo ID and the necessity to obtain an ID
17 whether it be a drivers license or whether it be an
18 actual Texas photo ID knowing the area as well as you
19 do when you look at some of the counties in my
20 district I think you probably better than most
21 fully appreciate the distances that one has to travel
22 in order to get an ID. And Ill just give you a few
23 examples. In addition to that though the fact that
24 many of these DPS offices are only open on very
25 sporadic days and times.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004054JA_003477
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 201 of 248
1 For example in Bandera County its
2 open -- the DPS office is only open on Wednesdays from
3 900 to 400. In Culberson County its only open--4the DPS office is only open on Thursdays from 900 to
5 500.
6 In Kinney County which is where
7 Brackettville is located the DPS office is only open
8 the first and third Tuesday of each month from 900 to
9 4 oclock. And then one other example of many
10 Terrell County which is down where Sanderson is
11 located the DPS office is only open one Monday a
12 month from 930 to 330.
13 So having said that my concern is the
14 fact that if an individual needs to obtain a photo ID
15 or a Texas drivers license the challenges that they
16 will face in one having to go to those offices two
17 the distances that theyll have to travel and then
18 three if theyre not familiar with the dates or the
19 times that they are open the fact that they may have
20 to go back.
21 And if theyre not registered or they do
22 not obtain that in a timely manner which I understand
23 it could take up to 60 days or so to receive your
24 photo ID there is a very good chance that they will.
25 not be able to have that ID when they do go to vote.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004055JA_003478
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 202 of 248
1 Would you agree with me on that Sen. Fraser
2 SEN. FRASER Well that was a
3 consideration in looking at the parameters is that
4 the good news for you is we still have all the same
5 parameters for mail-in ballots. We havent changed
6 that. And all these other forms there is just a
7 multitude of things they can use for a secondary form
8 of identification. So if for some reason they
9 couldnt get to that -- and I would -- you know you
10 and I know that most of those people out there drive
11 and they do have cars the bulk of them do and they
12 would be -- they would really like to go and get that
13 drivers license. But if they couldnt and they were
14 going to vote there is a multitude of things they can
15 use for identification to make it really really easy
16 or they could do a mail-in ballot. Weve made it easy
17 for them.
18 SEN. URESTI And I appreciate you
19 bringing that up because thats a good segue into my
20 next question. But again going back to the poverty
21 rate I would respectfully disagree with you
22 Sen. Fraser that they all have cars because most of
23 them cant afford cars at least in my district.
24 On Page 5 of your bill Senator you
25 reference -- Page 5 Line 20 under Documentation of
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004056JA_003479
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 203 of 248
190
1 Proof of Identification you reference a United
2 States military identification card that contains the
3 persons photograph. And I just want to make sure
4 that I clearly understand what you have in your bill.
5 and that for those military individuals whether they
6 be active duty reservists retired et cetera if
7 there is no photograph on their military ID then they
8 would not be able to use that ID under your bill. Is
9 that correct
10 SEN. FRASER Im sorry Senator. I
11 think you probably have misread this. Youre under
12 the section that lays out the acceptable form of photo
13 ID. But if it doesnt have a photo on it it could be
14 used as one of the non-photo IDs plus one other form
15 of identification. So the answer to your question is
16 yes they could use it.
17 SEN. URESTI Okay. So a military ID
18 that does not have a photo could be used
19 SEN. FRASER Yes. Its a form of
20 government identification.
21 SEN. URESTI Okay. Thats not the way
22 I read it but Im glad you cleared that up for me.
23 SEN. FRASER Under the 2 it would be
24 one of their forms of identification. It is a
25 government-issued form of identification. And under
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004057JA_003480
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 204 of 248
191
1 the non-photo area it would be used.
2 SEN. URESTI And just so Im clear _it
3 reads a United States military identification card
4 that contains the persons photograph. What my
5 question is if there is a military ID card that does
6 not have a photograph then youre saying that those
7 military individuals whether they be active duty
8 whether they be reservists whether they be retired
9 would not be able to vote with that form of ID. Is
10 that correct
11 SEN. FRASER That is not correct. ha.
12 would be one of their forms of ID. And if they had
13 one other piece of identification their utility bill
14 with that military ID theyre fine.
15 SEN. URESTI Whether it has a
16 photograph or no
17 SEN. FRASER Yes.
18 SEN. URESTI Okay. Very good. Thats
19 good to know.
20 Going into the alternative forms of
21 documentation specifically on Page 6 what Im trying
22 to reconcile and what is confusing to me and 1
23 believe would be very confusing to the voters of
24 Texas and complicated on Page 6 Line 14 you list
25 the following documents -- I beg your pardon -- The
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004058JA_003481
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 205 of 248
192
1 following documentation is acceptable as proof of
2 identification under this chapter.
3 Then it goes on to read Subparagraph
4 1 a copy of a current utility bill Paragraph 25 official mail Paragraph 3 a certified copy
6 Paragraph 4 United States citizenship papers
7 Paragraph 5 an original or certified copy and then
8 No. 6 court records.
9 And so Im trying to reconcile those
10 different terms in that you have a copy you have
11 official document you are certified document you
12 have papers you have original or certified copy and
13 then you have court records.
14 And to me thats confusing as an
15 attorney much less I think to my constituents. And
16 so specifically -- this is my question Sen. Fraser--17on No. 16 sic under the Paragraph b where it
18 reads a copy of a current utility bill bank
19 statement government check paycheck or other
20 government document that leads me to believe that _f
21 they brought the original document they would not be
22 able to use the original document it would have to be
23 a copy of that document. Is that correct
24 SEN. FRASER I think youreover-25reading the issue because this is current law. This
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004059JA_003482
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 206 of 248
193
1 is current law that were operating. If you voted in
2 this last election you voted under this. If you will
3 look at that -- and I believe -- is that not taken
4 from current law So if youre confused about it
5 today you were confused about it yesterday because
6 it was -- thats current law.
7 SEN. URESTI Well let me tell you why
8 Im confused Sen. Fraser because if you go on into
9 Paragraph 2 thats not current law and Paragraph
10 3 thats not current law for specifically Paragraph
11 3 you insert a certified copy. Paragraph 512 you put an original or certified copy. So thats
13 why its confusing Sen. Fraser and thats why Im
14 trying to clarify it because you use a copy in one
15 instance then you use a certified copy in another
16 instance. But here is my question. I want to go back
17 to my question.
18 SEN. FRASER Wait wait wait. Hold on
19 a second. Youve got to answer the one that you just
20 asked. One of the great things about these
21 hearings -- and its the same answer I gave now to the
22 last eight people Ive talked to -- Im about to have
23 the Secretary of State come up here. The Secretary of
24 States job is to issue the clarification of adopt-ing
25 rules to clarify the implementation of the law we
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004060JA_003483
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 207 of 248
194
1 passed. And I would -- I dont want to put words in
2 their mouth but I would assume theyre going to say
3 We can handle that.
4 SEN. URESTI Okay. And I appreciate
5 that. And because you cant speak for the Secretary
6 of State and because you are the author of this bill
7 I just wanted to ask you so I could clarify and so I
8 can explain it to the voters of Texas and to my
9 constituents then -- and I think you understand now
10 what Im trying to reconcile in that you asked for
11 different documentation. And one it can be a copy
12 or it can be the official mail et cetera. And I will
13 ask the specific questions of the Secretary of State.
14 SEN. FRASER I think it would be a good
15 idea to do that.
16 SEN. URESTI But because you are the
17 author I wanted to ask you specifically. And then T
18 think my last question Sen. Fraser if you bear with
19 me one second. I beg your pardon.
20 On Page 4 under Section 8 on Line 20
21 where it reads did not deliberately provide false
22 information to secure registration in a precinct In
23 which the voter does not reside Im trying to
24 understand what you mean when you put deliberately
25 provide false information.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004061JA_003484
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 208 of 248
195
1 SEN. FRASER Senator again--2SEN. URESTI And 2--3SEN. FRASER -- I dont want to
4 interrupt you here but youre quoting current law.
5 Thats law right now that we have been living under
6 for some period of time. And if youve got a question
7 about the interpretation of the Secretary of States
8 rule on that I bet they would answer it.
9 SEN. URESTI And I hope they can. But
10 Senator this is part of your bill though. 1--11SEN. FRASER Now just a second. You
12 know the way this works in legislation is that if its
1.3 current law you reprint current law. And if youre
14 going to make a change you insert it and underline.
15 And all were doing there -- we could have left all
16 that out and make you work and go see how it fits
17 together. But you know you have been here a long
18 time and you know thats the way it works is we go
19 ahead and tell you what current law is so it reads
20 correctly. I didnt make that law up. Its just a
21 law that is there. And I think you could ask the
22 Secretary of State the way its interpreted.
23 SEN. URESTI And I appreciate that.
24 But did you not strike certain language from current
25 law in this bill Sen. Fraser
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004062JA_003485
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 209 of 248
1 SEN. FRASER If it was struck -- did we
2 strike -- just a second.
3 Brief pause
4 Im not advised as to whether we struck
5 something. I believe the language that youre
6 referring to on Line 20 is current law and above and
7 below it is current law. And I to my knowledge--8but again I think you should ask the Secretary of
9 State that.
10 SEN. URESTI And Ill do that. Thank
11 you Sen. Fraser.
12 SEN. FRASER You bet. Thank you.
13 SEN. DUNCAN Sen. Van de Putte.
14 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Thank you
15 Mr. President.
16 And Sen. Fraser Im
17 SEN. FRASER It was wishful thinking.
18 SEN. VAN de PUTTE And I would have
19 hoped that this question would have been asked before
20 and Ive listened and its not and I know that we
21 would love to--22SEN. FRASER I would love to have a new
23 question.
24 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Well thank you.
25 Im going to be very very quick. I am looking at
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004063JA_003486
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 210 of 248
197
1 Page 5 Line 27.
2 SEN. FRASER Just a second. Let me get
3 my glasses Senator. Hold on. Im deaf and blind.
4 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Section 10 of the
5 bill.
6 SEN. FRASER Section 10. What page
7 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Page 5 Line 27.
8 SEN. FRASER Got it.
9 SEN. VAN de PUTTE In that section
10 there is a change from the United States citizenship
11 papers -- and you strike that -- to certificate. Tell
12 me what is the difference between a certificate and
13 the papers
14 SEN. FRASER Senator again you andI-15have served together a long time. And you know when
16 these bills come from Leg. Council that if there is
17 clean-up legislation they need to clarify something
18 that is either case law. The answer is I dont know
19 why they struck that.
20 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Well it--21SEN. FRASER It was not our
22 recommendation. This came from Leg. Council this way.
23 I can find out the answer to that--24SEN. VAN de PUTTE Okay.
25 SEN. FRASER -- but I can honestly say
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004064JA_003487
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 211 of 248
1 98
1 I dont know.
2 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Okay. Well I think
3 there is different terminology. It is my
4 understanding since I represent a Hispanic
5 district -- and many of the senators here have a
6 number of Hispanics -- this is especially important
7 for naturalized citizen. It is my understanding that
8 the certificate means the 8-by-11 certificate with a
9 photo that is given at the time of naturalization. Sc
10 it does have a photo and its under your section that
11 it would be okay for a photo. My question is that the
12 government also issues a wallet-sized card that is
13 listed as a paper. That could be part of the paper
14 but it has no ID.
15 On the section of the bill that you talk
16 about non-photo which would be Page 6 Line 24 it
17 says United States citizenship papers. Papers I
18 think are the card. But the papers are they the
19 certificate And the reason I ask is because at the
20 time of naturalization -- and many of us have
21 Hispanics in our district that as young children were
22 naturalized. That picture is of a child and doesnt
23 match up. So how--24SEN. FRASER Senator -- and aga_i_ri I
25 dont want to dodge your question. I think probably
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00004065JA_003488
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 212 of 248
1Ithis is a legitimate question to ask the Secretary of
2 State.
3 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Okay.
4 SEN. FRASER Im not sure they can
5 answer that one. But I will tell you my intent on
6 this is not to deny any legal voter that should have
7 the right to vote and that if someone is using this
8 as a source of documentation and it is a legal
9 documentation that proved they are who they say they
10 are I want them to be able to use it. I want all
11 Hispanics that you represent--12SEN. VAN de PUTTE Yes.
13 SEN. FRASER -- to have the ability to
14 vote under this bill and my intent is to increase
15 their right to do that. So if there is a tweak needed
16 there I can tell you Im open to it. I dont know
17 the answer to the question youre asking.
18 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Well thank you. In
19 researching that there is a difference between
20 certificate and paper. On one the certificate
21 does have a photo ID the paper does not. And I think
22 thats probably why Leg. Council did that.
23 SEN. FRASER You and I could probably
24 sit down with a Leg. Council lawyer ask them what
25 happened the meaning of that. And it is certainly
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004066JA_003489
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 213 of 248
2.JC
1 not my intent in any way to deny someone the right to
2 vote. My intentions are exactly the opposite. I want
3 them to be able to identify themself and vote.
4 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Well thank you
5 Senator because the picture photo for many of my
6 constituents who have been naturalized and are now
7 adults or maybe even elderly does not match up
8 because that was taken at the time of naturali_zatior.
9 And my fear was that an election clerk
10 having to know the difference between certificates and
11 paper and then maybe the name not matching up
12 particularly for women who then would be -- the
13 naturalization paper certificate would never match up
14 with your married name if you were naturalized as a
15 child and that would be extremely discriminatory
16 toward Hispanic citizens and particularly to this
17 state which may not have been a problem in Georgia or
18 Indiana but is definitely a problem here and 1
19 appreciate that.
20 SEN. FRASER Not a -- absolutely we
21 want -- if someone is a legal citizen and has
22 identification and theyre registered to vote then I
23 want them to have the ability to do that.
24 One of the questions you just asked
25 about the picture not matching up I would also advise
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004067JA_003490
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 214 of 248
2 0 1
1 you to ask the Secretary of State that is that I
2 think theres methodology that its even addressed--3it was anticipated -- in some of the things I read
4 that if I grew a beard and I dont look like I used
5 to a methodology to make sure that we could verify
6 who you say you are.
7 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Thank you Senator.
8 And I have one follow-up question. You and I have the
9 luxury and the blessing of representing many now Texas
10 residents who are voting in the state who happen to be
11 military families and military members. And I know
12 you are well aware of Fort Hood and Sen. Shapleigh at
13 Fort Bliss. My question is a follow-up to Sen.
14 Urestis questions on military ID.
15 Many times the identification of record
16 doesnt have the address of the voting. So if they
17 were voting here but their address of record is at--18how would under your bill a clerk treat that
19 inconsistency of a nonmatch-up for our military
20 members
21 SEN. FRASER Again Senator -- and I
22 thank you for acknowledging my district being
23 impacted. I believe that I have the largest number of
24 ex-military in the state living in my senate district
25 you know former military. I want to make sure that
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004068JA_003491
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 215 of 248
2 2
1 they have the right to vote.
2 Yes they do change addresses but this
3 is something that we have been coping with for years
4 even under our current system. Again I think the
5 Secretary of State is capable of not only answering
6 that question but also making sure we have a seamless
7 transition to this because its extremely important
8 to me and I know it is to you is that I want to make
9 sure that our brave men and women that have served
10 this country preserve that very basic right in making
11 sure they get to vote in elections.
12 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Thank you Senator.
13 I appreciate that. And I want to clarify just for
14 the last time so that I understand. With the changes
15 that you are proposing every Texan who wishes to cast
16 a ballot would have to bring both their certificate
17 voter certificate thats issued by the jurisdiction
18 that theyve registered in and some sort of photo
19 identification. Is that correct
20 SEN. FRASER Well thats not exactly
21 the way you phrased that. Actually for someone to
22 vote all theyve got to do is show up. So that
23 the -- I need to ask a question. I just thought of
24 something.
25 Brief pause
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004069JA_003492
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 216 of 248
1 Okay. Im sitting here having a
2 discussion with my staff clarifying that that is the
3 case. And I can tell you my intent on this would be
4 that its -- here would be the example I would give
5 you. I go to Marble Falls or Horseshoe Bay to vote.
6 I never have my voter ID. I always just pull out my
7 drivers license. Lets just say for some reason I
8 forgot my drivers license. My intent would be if I
9 have two other pieces of identification listed here
10 and they match up with the voter roll and it says
11 Troy Fraser 103 Lighthouse a particular precinct
12 it would be my intention you should vote.
13 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Well thats--14SEN. FRASER Im not clear -- I want to
15 make sure as you do -- and I think what youre
16 raising is making sure that the bill absolutely says
17 that and that is the intent.
18 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Well thank you
19 Sen. Fraser because the way I looked at this I
20 thought that every Texan who wants to cast a ballot
21 now will have to present with both the voter
22 certificate and a photo ID or the certificate and two
23 alternate forms. So you either have a two-fer or a
24 three-fer. And Im just wondering if thats correct
25 or if someone shows up and they do not have their.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004070JA_003493
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 217 of 248
2 0
1 certificate do they just need a photo ID And if
2 they show up and they dont have their certificate or
3 a photo what other two--4SEN. FRASER I dont have the answer
5 for you today. Ill be honest with you that Ive got
6 to look at that. I wish I could give you an answer on
7 that but I dont have an answer right now. And Ive
8 got to look at the bill talk to the Secretary of
9 States office see how that flows together look at
10 the election official and determine how we blend that
11 together.
12 My intention is that I want everyone to
13 vote. Ill give you that as a blanket answer. My
14 intention is that if someone can prove who they say
15 they are I want them to vote.
16 SEN. VAN de PUTTE Thank you
17 Sen. Fraser.
18 SEN. FRASER Thank you.
1.9 SEN. DUNCAN Nobody else
20 All right members. Sen. Gallegos -- I
21 thought I had lost count.
22 SEN. GALLEGOS A question of the
23 author.
24 SEN. FRASER This is the three-minute
25 rule. Are we using the egg timer rule
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004071JA_003494
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 218 of 248
20
1 SEN. GALLEGOS Well you already
2 surpassed that so I thought I would--3SEN. FRASER No. Im still just
4 answering your questions.
5 SEN. GALLEGOS Well Senator let me
6 ask you have you thought about the state of our
7 economy and the steadily rising number of foreclosures
8 taking place And Im talking about this bill. Just
9 last week the Dallas Morning News reported that the
10 Carrollton-Farmers Branch School District has seen
11 185 percent increase in the 2008-2009 school year of
12 homeless students.
13 SEN. FRASER Senator can you help me
14 here Im having trouble. Im looking at the bill
15 and Im having trouble finding the place that has to
16 do with foreclosures.
17 SEN. GALLEGOS Well no no no. Im
18 getting to my question if you allow me.
19 SEN. FRASER I will.
20 SEN. GALLEGOS These are people in the
21 State of Texas whose entire families are affected.
22 And the homeless as you know well know they move
23 around a lot. Theyre U.S. citizens and they move
24 around a lot and stay in cars in shelters and
25 sometimes relatives houses. But the important thing
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004072JA_003495
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 219 of 248
206
1 is that they do not have a permanent residence even
2 though theyre U.S. citizens.
3 And I guess -- and they dont have
4 utility bills they arent on a current regular
5 schedule. And to show if that is asked for when they
6 go to a precinct to vote I guess my question is
7 under your bill under this scenario is there a
8 on how many times they can get an official DPS ID to
9 vote every couple of weeks
10 SEN. FRASER Well first of all Im
11 confused in your description of this because for
12 someone to register to vote and be legal to vote they
13 have to specify the precinct that theyre in. And
14 thats one -- I think one of the requirements that the
15 Secretary of State looked for is that you have to be
16 a resident voting in a specific precinct and they had
17 to mail that to somewhere. But the answer to your
18 question that you were getting to is is there a11mi-19on the number of IDs they can get And no there is
20 no limit.
21 SEN. GALLEGOS There is no limit under
22 your bill
23 SEN. FRASER No limit.
24 SEN. GALLEGOS Okay. All right. Thank
25 you.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004073JA_003496
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 220 of 248
207
1 SEN. FRASER Unlimited IDs.
2 SEN. GALLEGOS Theres unlimited ID.
3 Okay. All right. Thank you.
4 SEN. FRASER Thank you.
5 SEN. DUNCAN Okay members. If there
6 are no other questions we are now ready to move into
7 the invited testimony phase of the hearing. So at
8 this point in time I think I have been submitted--9actually we had the Secretary of State collect the
10 list from the author and those who might be opposed to
11 the bill.
12 And as stated earlier I will first
13 invite -- well have Hans von Spakovsky to testify
14 first. He is proposed by Sen. Fraser. And then
15 followed by that well have Tova Andrea Wang who is
16 proposed by Sen. Van de Putte. If we could bring them
17 into the chamber. And we will have a timer that will
18 be 10 minutes.
19 Sen. Van de Putte I believe you had a
20 witness that you needed a little bit longer time. Is
21 this the witness
22 Okay. And members again Ill state
23 again we will not recognize anybody for a question
24 during the 10-minute period of time for layout.
25 Thereafter we will allow questions. Ill remind you
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004074JA_003497
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 221 of 248
2 0 8
1 that we have the public testimony that will follow
2 after the invited testimony so be efficient. But
3 you know youre entitled to ask your questions.
4 So is Mr. von Spakovsky in the chamber
5 And for the sake of time if we could go
6 ahead and bring Tova Andrea Wang into the chamber.
7 Is this -- who is this
8 Off-the-record discussion
9 SEN. DUNCAN Mr. von Spakovsky.
10 Okay. She will go second.
11 Okay Mr. von Spakovsky youre
12 recognized. You need to state your name and who youa
13 represent. I believe you have turned in a witness
14 affirmation card. You have 10 minutes. That will be
15 strictly enforced. And you have a timer there in
16 front of you. You can begin.
17 Proceedings continued in Volume 1B
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004075JA_003498
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 222 of 248
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE
THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
EIGHTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SENATE
AUSTIN TEXAS
IN RE
CONSIDERATION OFSENATE BILL 362
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SENATE
TUESDAY MARCH 10 2009
BE IT REMEMBERED THAT AT 550 p..m. on
Tuesday the 10th day of March 2009 theabove-entitledmatter continued at the Texas State Capitol
Senate Chamber Austin Texas before the Committee of
the Whole Senate and the following proceedings were
reported by Aloma J. Kennedy a Certified Shorthand
Reporter of
VOLUME lB PAGES 209 - 980
1ý 1NNE D
1111L1i\ L
a record ofexcellence
1801 Lavaca Suite 115 Austin Texas 78701 512-474-2233
TX_0000OR I G I N A LJA_003499
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 223 of 248
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 PAGE
3 VOLUME 1A
4 PROCEEDINGS TUESDAY MARCH 10 2009 2
5 ROLL CALL NO. 1 2
6 OPENING INSTRUCTIONS BY SEN. DUNCAN 5
7 OBJECTION TO FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF SB 362
SEN. WEST 12
8
ROLL CALL NO. 2 38
9
LAYING OUT OF SENATE BILL 36210 SEN FRASER 44
11 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 53
12 VOLUME 1B
13 INVITED TESTIMONY 210
14 TESTIMONY BY HANS VON SPAKOVSKY 210
QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 21815
TESTIMONY BY TOVA ANDREA WANG 27716 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 287
17 TESTIMONY BY CAMERON QUINN 300
QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 30618
TESTIMONY BY TOBY MOORE 33619 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 344
20 TESTIMONY BY FRANK B. STRICKLAND 373QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 417
21
TESTIMONY BY ADAM SKAGGS 40822 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 417
23 TESTIMONY OF ROBERT A. SIMMSSUBMITTED BY WES TAILOR435-24TESTIMONY BY J. GERALD HEBERT 442
25 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 450
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004077JA_003500
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 224 of 248
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 PAGE
3 VOLUME 2
4 PROCEEDINGS WEDNESDAY MARCH 11 2009 482
5
QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR CONTINUED 4826
7 TESTIMONY BY THOMAS WHEELER 502QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 510
8
TESTIMONY BY CHANDLER DAVIDSON 521
9 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 527
10 TESTIMONY BY ED JOHNSON 559QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 566
11
TESTIMONY BY DANIEL B. KOHRMAN 62112 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 628
13 TESTIMONY BY COBY SHORTER 653QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 655
14
TESTIMONY BY DENNIS BOREL 70615 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 713
16 TESTIMONY BY GARY GLEDSOE 724QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 731
17
TESTIMONY BY ERIC NICHOLS 74218 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 750
19
20 PUBLIC TESTIMONY 771
21 CLAIRE OXLEY GLUCK 771
22 HAZEL COTTON 773QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 775
23
KATHY HICKS 77624 JAMES E. CARTER 779
RUSTY HICKS 78125
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004078JA_003501
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 225 of 248
111
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 PAGE
PUBLIC TESTIMONY CONTINUED3
TINA BENKISER 784
4 B.R. SKIPPER WALLACE 787ANITA PRIVETT 789
5 MARY ANN COLLINS 792
6 ROSA ROSALES 7 94
QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 7977
DUSTIN RYNDERS 8008
MARSHA CORREIRA 8039 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 806
10 RENE LARA 807LEE MEDLEY 810
11 JOHN WATKINS 811.
KENNETH FLIPPEN 81312 ANNIE BANKS 816
RACHEL HERNANDEZ 81713 RENATO DE LOS SANTOS 819
JUDY HOLLOWAY 82314 LYDIA CAMARILLO 825
EDWARD B. WILLIAMS 82815 MADELEINE DEWAR 830
HELEN VILLARREAL 83316 MARK WILLIAMSON 835
VANESSA FOSTER 83817
LUIS FIGUERO 84018 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR 844
19 PATTI EDELMAN 844SYLVIA MENDOZA 846
20 KENNETH KOYM 84 E3
KAREN RENICK 85021 JONI ASHBROOK 853
DUANE RAWSON 85622 ROD FLUKER 858
23 ROLL CALL NO. 3 864
24
PROCEEDINGS CONCLUDED 86925
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004079JA_003502
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 226 of 248
iV
1 EXHIBIT INDEX
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 1A Sen. Van de Putte 3/3/09 Memoto Sen. Duncan re ground rules
4 for Committee of the WholePubic hearing 21 21
5
1B Sen. Duncan 3/5/09 Memo to Sen.6 Van de Putte re response to
concerns about ground rules7 for the Committee of the Whole
Senate 21 21
8
2. Letter to Texas Attorney General9 Greg Abbott re Hearing on SB
362 signed by 11 Senators 21 21
10
3. Senate Notice of Public11 Hearing on SB 362 for 3/10/09 21 21.
12 4. Texas Senate Agenda 3/10/09 21 21
13 5A 3/10/09 Tag Form signed bySen. Royce West et al 21 21
14
5B 3/10/09 Tag Form signed by15 Sen. Mario Gallegos 21 21
16 6. Roll Call No. 2 - Sen.
Gallegos Appeal of Ruling17 of Chair on Sen. Wests
Point of Order 120 12018
7. Institute of Public Policy19 Publication entitled The
Effects of Photographic20 Identification on Voter
Turnout in Indiana A21 County-Level Analysis
by Jeffrey Milyo Report22 10-2007 Revised December
2007 120 12023
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004080JA_003503
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 227 of 248
V
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 8. AU News publication entitledMuch-hyped Turnout Record
4 Fails to Materialize -
Convenience Voting Fails to5 Boost Balloting 120 120
6 9. Symposium paper entitledThe Empirical Effects of
7 Voter-ID Laws Present orAbsent by Jason D. Mycoff
8 Michael W. Wagner andDavid C. Wilson 120 120
9
10. 9/10/07 Report of the10 Heritage Center for Data
Analysis entitled New11 Analysis Shows Voter
Identification Laws Do Not12 Reduce Turnout by David B.
Muhlhausen and Keri Weber13 Sikich 120 120
14 11. New York Times article -
September 23 2005 - entitled15 Voting Reform is in the
Cards by Jimmy Carter16 and James A. Baker III 160 160
17 12. Harvey Kronbergs Quorum ReportApril 23 2007 entitled Royal
18 Masset The Voter ID Bill WillKill My Mothers Right to Vote 160 160
19
13. 2/3/08 article entitled A20 Clearer Picture on Voter ID
by Jimmy Carter and James A.
21 Baker III 160 160
22 14. Testimony of Hans A. vonSpakovsky March 10 2009
23 re SB 362 217 217
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004081JA_003504
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 228 of 248
v
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 15A 6/11/07 Letter to SenateCommittee on Rules and
4 Administration re Hans A.
von Spakovsky nomination 254 2545
15B 6/12/07 Article entitled6 Obama Raises Concerns Over
FEC Nominees Record of7 Partisanship 254 254
8 15C 10/3/07 Letter to the U.S.Senate from Public Citizen 254 254
9
16. Institute of Public Policy10 Publication entitled The
Effects of Photographic11 Identification on Voter
Turnout in Indiana A12 County-Level Analysis by
Jeffrey Milyo Report13 10-2007 Revised December
2007 SAME AS EXHIBIT 7 265 26514
17. Testimony of Tova Andrea Wang15 Vice President Research Common
Cause March 10 2009 re SB 362 300 30016
18. Report of the Commission on17 Federal Election Reform entitled
Building Confidence in U.S.18 Elections September 2005 313 313
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004082JA_003505
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 229 of 248
vi
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 19. Fifteen letters to the Hon.Dianne Feinstein Chair and the
4 Hon. Robert F. Bennett rankingminority member U.S. Senate
5 Committee on Rules andAdministration
6
1. 6/29/07 letter from Hans7 A. von Spakovsky
2. 3/22/07 letter from various8 members of Congress
3. 3/13/07 letter from William9 H. Jordan
4. 2/08/07 letter from Gary J.
10 Smith5. 2/26/07 letter from P. K.
11 Brunelli6. 3/01/07 letter from J. A.
12 Borras7. 2/21/07 letter from Trey
13 Grayson8. 2/20/07 letter from Beverly
14 B. Kaufman9. 2/19/07 letter from Todd
15 Rokita10. 2/16/07 letter from Frank
16 B. Strickland11. 2/14/07 letter from Tom Lowe
17 12. 2/13/07 letter fromT. Rogers Wade
18 13. 2/14/06 letter from JohnnyIsakson
19 14. 2/09/07 letter from WesleyR. Kliner Jr.
20 15. 3/13/07 letter from RayMartinez III 333 333
21
20. Brennan Center For Justice letter22 dated October 3 2007 by
Executive Director Michael23 Waldman with attachments 335 335
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004083JA_003506
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 230 of 248
viii
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 21. Prepared Remarks of Dr. TobyMoore Research Triangle
4 regarding Evidence of the
impact of voter ID requirements5 and the prospects of US DOJ
preclearance March 10 2009 358 358
6
22. Harris County Map submitted7 by Sen. Gallegos 366 366
8 23. Testimony of Frank B.
Strickland re SB 3629 March 10 2009 373 373
10 24. Testimony of Adam SkaggsCounsel Democracy Program
11 Brennan Center for Justice atNYU School of Law regarding
12 The Myth of Voter ImpersonationFraud at the Polls
13 March 10 2009 408 408
14 25. Written Testimony of Robert A.
Simms Georgia Deputy Secretary15 of State presented to the
United States Senate Committee16 on Rules and Administration
submitted by Wes Tailor 435 43517
26. Testimony of J. Gerald Hebert18 re SB 362 March 10 2009 442 442
19 27. Letter from Rene Guerra March 62009 Criminal District Attorney
20 of Hidalgo CountySubmitted by Sen. Lucio 479 479
21
28. 3/4/09 Letter from Todd22 Rokita Indiana Secretary
of State to Sen. Fraser23 re SB 362 502 502
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004084JA_003507
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 231 of 248
X
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 29. Testimony of Chandler DavidsonTsanoff Professor of Public
4 Affairs Emeritus Rice Universityregarding The Historical Context
5 of Senate Bill 362 March 102009 521 521
6
30. 3/06 Printout from Texas AG7 Website entitled Helping Stamp
Out Voter Fraud in Texas by8 Greg Abbott Attorney General
of Texas submitted by9 Sen. Shapleigh 550 550
10 31. Dashwood case documentssubmitted by Ed Johnson Harris
11 County Tax Assessor-Collectorand Voter Registrars Office 559 559
12
32. Records from specific Harris13 County voting documents
submitted by Ed Johnson 559 55914
33. Harris County Deceased15 Voting History miscellaneous
registration applications16 submitted by Ed Johnson 559 559
17 34. Texas Voter RegistrationApplication form submitted
18 by Sen. Huffman 570 570
19 35. Testimony of Daniel B.
Kohrman Senior Attorney20 AARP Foundation re SB 362
March 10 2009 621 62721
36. Photographs of Voter Education22 Anderson County Workshop 2008 724 724
23 37. Testimony of Gary L. BledsoePresident Texas NAACP
24 re SB 362 March 10 2009 724 724
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004085JA_003508
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 232 of 248
x
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED38. Number of voters who have
3 registered since 2006 withouta drivers license number
4 submitted by Sen. Watson 767 767
5 39. The Special InvestigationsUnit Role and Investigative
6 Efforts and Fundingsubmitted by Sen. Huffman 767 767
7
40. Slip Opinion U.S. Supreme8 Court Crawford vs. Marion
County Election Board9 October Term 2007 768 768
10 41. U.S. Supreme Court Crawfordvs. Marion County Election
11 Board on Writ of Certiorarito U.S. Court of Appeals for
12 the Seventh Circuit Brief ofTexas Alabama Colorado
13 Florida Hawaii MichiganNebraska Puerto Rico and
14 South Dakota as Amici CuriaeSupporting Respondents 768 768
15
42. Written Testimony of Claire16 Oxley Gluck from Boerne in
Kendall County re SB 362 773 77317
43. Written Testimony of Hazel18 Cotton of Texarkana Texas
re SB 362 775 77519
44. Written Testimony of Kathy20 Hicks of Texarkana Texas
re SB 362 779 77921
45. Written Testimony of Donald22 Giles of Texarkana Texas
re SB 362 783 78323
46. Written Testimony of Anita24 Privett League of Women
Voters of Texas re SB 362 789 78925
11
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004086JA_003509
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 233 of 248
X
1 EXHIBIT INDEX continued
2 MARKED ADMITTED
3 47. Written Testimony of RosaRosales League of United
4 Latin American CitizensNational President
5 re SB 362 794 794
6 48. Written Testimony of DustinRynders Advocacy Inc.
7 re SB 362 800 800
8 49. Written Testimony of MarshaCorreira re SB 362 804 804
9
10 50. Written Testimony of RachelA. Hernandez re SB 362 817 811
11.
51. 10/17/08 Article by Nelda12 Wells Spears Voter Registrar
Travis County entitled 4000013 Voter Registration Applications
Processed in Time For Early14 Voting 825 825
15 52. Written Testimony of LydiaCamarillo SVREP Vice
16 President re SB 362 826 826
17 53. Written Testimony of LuisFigueroa Mexican American
18 Legal Defense and EducationFund MALDEF re SB 362 841 841
19
54. Written Testimony of Sylvia20 Mendoza re SB 362 848 848
21 55. Written Testimony of Dr. RodFluker Sr. Executive Director
22 for Texas Association of BlackPersonnel in Higher Education
23 re SB 362 861 861
24
25
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004087JA_003510
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 234 of 248
2 V
1 P R O C E E D I N G S
2 TUESDAY MAY 10 2009
3 550 p.m.
4 INVITED TESTIMONY
5 TESTIMONY BY HANS VON SPAKOVSKY
6 MR. von SPAKOVSKY Thank you
7 Mr. Chairman senators. I appreciate the invitation
8 to testify here today. My name is Hans von Spakovsky.
9 Im a legal scholar at the Heritage Foundation
10 although the opinions here today are my own.
11 Just by background Ive got extensive
12 experience in voting and election issues. I spent
13 four years at the Department of Justice as a voting
14 counsel. I spent two years on the Federal Election
15 Commission. I also spent five years as a member of a
16 county election board in Atlanta Georgia in Fulton
17 County which is the largest county in the state and
18 its a county thats about half African-American.
19 Guaranteeing the integrity of elections
20 requires having security throughout the entire
21 election process from the voter registration to
22 voting in the polls on Election Day to counting the
23 ballots. I doubt any of you here would think it would
24 be a good idea to give worldwide Internet access to
25 the computers that are in a county election deparLmeni
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004088JA_003511
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 235 of 248
2 1 1
1 that tabulate the vote.
2 Requiring someone to authenticate their
3 identity in the polling place is part and parcel of
4 the same kind of security. Every illegal vote steals
5 a vote from a legitimate voter. And voter ID doesnt
6 just prevent impersonation fraud at the polls it also
7 can prevent people from voting under fictitious voter.
8 registrations and also double voting by individuals
9 who are registered in more than one state.
10 Voter fraud does exist and criminal
11 penalties imposed after the fact are not sufficient to
12 protect against it. That claim was in fact raised
13 in the Indiana case and the Supreme Court said that
14 despite such criminal penalties there are flagrant
15 examples of such fraud that have been documented
16 throughout this nations history by respected
17 historians and journalists. They not only demonstrate
18 the risk of voter fraud is real but it could affect
19 the outcome of a close election.
20 Youve had some questions about why have
21 there not been more prosecutions of voter
22 impersonation. Well as the Seventh circuit said in
23 the Indiana case its hard to prosecute something
24 when you dont have the tool to detect it voter TD.
25 However if you want a good example oi
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004089JA_003512
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 236 of 248
1 this I wrote a paper last year for the Heritage
2 Foundation that detailed a publicly released state
3 grand jury report in New York City 1984 which
4 detailed a successful and undetected 14-year
5 conspiracy in which impersonation fraud was carried or
6 at the poll and thousands of fraudulent ballots were
7 cast in not just state legislative primary elections
8 but also in congressional elections.
9 Crews of from five to eight people were
10 recruited and sent from polling place to polling place
11 where they voted in the names of legitimate voters
12 people who were dead but still on the registration
13 lists individuals who had moved and also under the
14 names of fictitious voter registration names that had
1.5 been successfully registered.
16 According to the grand jury the advent
17 of mail-in registration was a key factor in this
18 fraud. It could have been easily stopped if New York
19 had had voter ID. In recent elections as you know
20 thousands of fraudulent voter registration forms were
21 detected by election officials. But given the mini.mal
22 screening efforts in many election jurisdictions
23 there is no way to know how many others slipped
24 through. In states with ID election officials--25without ID election officials have no way to prevent
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX00004090JA_003513
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 237 of 248
2 3
1 bogus votes from being cast.
2 The problem of double voting -- well
3 Ill give you an example of that. In the Indiana
4 Supreme Court case the League of Women Voters filed
5 an amicus brief against the law. And in it they
6 illustrated an Indiana voter an elderly woman who
7 they said had had problems voting. The local paper
8 went and interviewed here.
9 The reason she had had problems voting
10 she tried to use a Florida drivers license when she
11 went to her polling place in Indiana. Not only did
12 she have a Florida drivers license she was
13 registered to vote in Florida. In fact she owned a
14 home in Florida and had claimed a homestead exemption
15 which as you know you can only do if you are a
16 resident of the state. So the law actually worked to
17 prevent someone who could have voted twicewithout-18detection.
19 I dont mean to single out Texas. But
20 just like Indiana New York and Illinois Texas has a
21 long and unfortunate history of voter fraud. In the
22 late 1800s for example Harrison County was so
23 infamous that the phrase Harrison County methods
24 became synonymous with election fraud. Box 13 has
25 already been mentioned. The point is that there are
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004091JA_003514
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 238 of 248
21
1 individuals who are willing to break the law to try to
2 steal an election.
3 I dont claim that there is massive
4 voter fraud in Texas or elsewhere. In fact Im a
5 former election official and I think most of our
6 elections are run pretty well. But the potential for
7 abuse exists and there are many close elections that
8 could turn on just a handful of votes. And there are
9 enough incidents of voter fraud to make it very clear
10 we should take steps to stop that.
11 Now the biggest thing Ive heard today
12 is that voter ID will suppress the votes of voters
13 particularly the poor or the elderly. That is untrue.
14 Social science research shows that thats not the
15 case. And the actual election results in the two
16 states with the strictest voter ID in the country show
17 that is not true.
18 The Heritage Foundation released a study
19 in September 2007 that looked at voter turnout in
20 every state in the country in the 2004 election
21 comparing those states who had voter ID to those
22 states who do not. They found that voter ID laws do
23 not reduce the turnout of voters includingAfrican-24Americans and Hispanics that those voters were just
25 as likely to vote in states with ID as in states where
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004092JA_003515
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 239 of 248
25
_ just their name was asked.
2 A study by professors at the University
3 of Delaware and Nebraska-Lincoln examined data from
4 the 2000 2002 2004 and 2006 elections. The study
5 found that voter ID laws do not affect turnout
6 including across racial lines ethnic lines and
7 socioeconomic lines. The study concluded -- and Ill
8 give you their quote -- the concerns about voter 11
9 laws affecting turnout are much ado about nothing.
10 A professor at MIT as part o the
11 CalTech Voting Project did a survey of 36000
12 individuals to see what their Election Day experience
13 was like. Overwhelming support for voter ID. Only 23
14 individuals who had a problem voting because of voter
15 ID. And there was no indication in the survey if they
16 were actually eligible voters.
17 A lot of talk has been here about
18 election results in Georgia and Indiana. In Georgia
19 there was record turnout in the 2008 presidential
20 primary after the voter ID law went into effect a
21 million more voters than in 2004 when there was no
22 voter ID law in effect.
23 The number of African-Americans voting
24 in the 2008 presidential primary doubled from 2004
25 when there was no voter ID law in effect. In fact
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004093JA_003516
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 240 of 248
21 6
1. there were 100000 more votes in the Democratic
2 Primary in Georgia than in the Republican Primary.
3 The general election in Georgia one of the strictest_
4 voter ID laws in the country largest turnout in its
5 history. Democratic turnout was up 6.1 percentage
6 points from the 2004 election when there was no voter
7 ID. Overall turnout in Georgia was 6.7 percentage
8 points higher than in 2004 the second highest
9 increase of any state in the country.
10 The Georgia law has been upheld in every
11 federal and state court. And in fact the Georgia
12 judge who is a former Democratic legislator appointed
13 by Jimmy Carter pointed out that in two years of
14 litigation none of the organizations who sued
15 including the NAACP could come up with a single
16 witness a single individual who could not vote
17 because of the voter ID requirement.
18 In Indiana Democratic presidential
19 preference primary last year Democratic turnout
20 quadrupled from the 2004 election. In fact it was up
21 8.32 percentage points from 2004 the largest increase
22 in Democratic turnout of any state in the country.
23 And the Supreme Court said Indiana has the strictest
24 voter ID law in the country.
25 We are only one of about 100 democracies
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004094JA_003517
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 241 of 248
2 7
1 that do not require photo ID. Our southern neighbor
2 Mexico which has a much larger population in poverty
3 requires both a photo ID and a thumb print when people
4 go to vote. Since they put that provision in in the
5 mid-1990s turnout has increased in their elections.
6 Requiring voters to authenticate their
7 identity is a perfectly reasonable and easily met
8 requirement. Its supported by the vast majority of
9 voters. All the polling data shows that. And it
10 protects the integrity and reliability of the
11 electoral process as the Supreme Court said and i_
12 also maintains the confidence of individuals in the
13 security of their elections.
14 And Im done Mr. Chairman.
15 SEN. DUNCAN Thank you Mr. von
16 Spakovsky. Before I entertain any questions you have
17 written testimony. Do you wish to submit that into
18 the record
19 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I would like to
20 submit it. I believe I gave it to the Clerk Mr.
21 Chairman.
22 Exhibit No. 14 marked and admitted
23 SEN. DUNCAN Okay. We have it marked
24 as Exhibit 14.
25 Members are there any questions for
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004095JA_003518
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 242 of 248
218
1 Mr. Von Spakovsky
2 Sen West.
3 SEN. WEST Will we be asking questions
4 from the chair or standing up
5 SEN. DUNCAN Standing up.
6 QUESTIONS FROM SENATE FLOOR
7 SEN. WEST Okay. Sir lets talk about
8 your background. Weve met before back in 2003 I
9 think it was. As it relates -- are you coming as a
10 neutral and detached witness or have some sort of bias
11 one way or the other for this particular issue
12 MR. von SPAKOVSKY Im not quite sure
13 how to answer that question.
14 SEN. WEST Well let me ask the
15 question this way You are a former Republican chair
16 are you not
17 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I was a county party
18 Republican chair over 10 years ago.
19 SEN. WEST Okay. Have you authored
20 studies or position papers on requiring voter IDs at
21 polling locations
22 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I have. In fact I
23 wrote an article for a Texas Law Review on it.
24 SEN. WEST Have you authored articles
25 on requiring the verification of social security
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004096JA_003519
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 243 of 248
219
1 numbers of voters
2 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I have. And in
3 fact thats now a federal requirement under the Help
4 America Vote Act.
5 SEN. WEST Have you authored articles
6 on eliminating no-fault absentee voting
7 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I believe I have
8 yes.
9 SEN. WEST And whats the rationale--10what is your rationale for no-fault absentee voting
11 And lets define it first of all. As I understand
12 no-fault absentee voting that basically means that a
13 person should not be able to give any reason not to--14any reason in order to cast an absentee ballot. So a
15 person who may very well have business outside of the
16 county on Election Day if you had your way they
17 would not be able to vote. Correct
18 MR. von SPAKOVSKY Thats incorrect
19 Senator.
20 SEN. WEST Okay. Then what is the
21 elimination of no-fault absentee voting
22 MR. von SPAKOVSKY There are some
23 states -- in most states you have to have a reason to
24 vote absentee Youre disabled youre elderly
25 youre going to be out of town on business. I
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004097JA_003520
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 244 of 248
2 2 0
1 completely agree with those plus the fact if youre a
2 military voter. There are some states where you dont
3 have to have any reason to vote absentee.
4 SEN. WEST Is Texas one of those
5 states
6 MR. von SPAKOVSKY Im not sure what
7 the rule is in Texas.
8 SEN. WEST If we were then you would
9 want to eliminate that. Right
10 MR. von SPAKOVSKY Well there are two
11 things there Senator. The first is that absentee
12 ballot fraud is one of the biggest sources of voter
13 fraud. In fact Ive written a paper about that.
14 And second theres more than one study -- in fact
15 one by the Center For the Study of the American
16 Electorate which indicates that states that have put
17 in no-fault absentee balloting in fact it has
18 possibly hurt the turnout of their voters.
19 SEN. WEST In terms of other articles
20 that you have worked on the white papers that you
21 have written eliminating motor voter registration--22MR. von SPAKOVSKY Thats incorrect.
23 SEN. WEST Okay. Youre not for
24 eliminating motor voter registration
25 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I think there are
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004098JA_003521
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 245 of 248
22
1 problems with mail-in voter registration but I also
2 think that the provisions of motor voter which require
3 you to be able to get registered to vote when you go
4 get your drivers license or when you go to a public
5 assistance office I think those are very good
6 provisions.
7 SEN. WEST What about the requirement
8 of two witnesses on a notary to sign an absentee
9 ballot are you for Have you advocated that or what
10 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I believe that
11 because of the problems with absentee ballots and
12 voter fraud that having either a witness or a notary
13 for an absentee ballot is a good idea.
14 SEN. WEST You have indicated that
15 theres numerous studies that show that there has beer
16 no impact negative impact on the minority vote in
17 several states and youve alluded to some 2008
18 elections. Let me put a pin in that for a second.
19 Have you been the author of any of the studies that
20 you have mentioned as relates to voter suppression
21 MR. von SPAKOVSKY To voter
22 suppression
23 SEN. WEST Right -- oh Im sorry. I
24 should not have said that.
25 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I
--KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233
TX_00004099JA_003522
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 246 of 248
222
1 SEN. WEST I should not have saidvote-2suppression. I apologize. Have you been the author
3 of any studies that deal with the impact of voter ID
4 on minority votes
5 MR. von SPAKOVSKY Yes.
6 SEN. WEST And which studies have those
7 been
8 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I wrote a paper that
9 looked at the State of Georgia and some other states
10 that had voter ID laws. And I looked at turnout of
11 African-American voters both before the law went into
12 effect and after the law went into effect.
13 SEN. WEST In the State of Georgia
14 MR. von SPAKOVSKY And yes I looked
15 at the State of Georgia.
16 SEN. WEST For what year -- years
17 MR. von SPAKOVSKY I started with the
18 first voter ID law that went into effect in Georgia in
19 1999 which was then amended later on and I looked at.
20 the effects of all of those laws.
21 SEN. WEST Okay. Did you also look at
22 2008
23 MR. von SPAKOVSKY The paper was
24 written before the 2008 election.
25 SEN. WEST Have you looked at any
--KENNEDYREPORTING SERVICE INC.
512.474.2233
TX_00004100JA_003523
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 247 of 248
223
1 have you been the author of any studies that looked at
2 the 2008 election
3 MR. von SPAKOVSKY Ive written several
4 articles about that yes sir.
5 SEN. WEST As relates to those
6 articles did you conclude that -- was that in the
7 State of Indiana or Georgia or what
8 MR. von SPAKOVSKY In some of the
9 articles Ive written Ive mentioned election results
10 in both Indiana and in Georgia.
11 SEN. WEST And so its your testimony
12 that voter ID had no negative impact on the minority
13 vote in either one of those states in 2008
14 MR. von SPAKOVSKY Thats what the
15 facts and figures from the election show.
16 SEN. WEST Did you take into
17 consideration who the candidates were at that time in
18 Indiana and Georgia. And--19MR. von SPAKOVSKY Yes Senator.
20 SEN. WEST -- did that have an impact
21 Were you able to check out the influence of President
22 Barack Obama being on the ballot
23 MR. von SPAKOVSKY Senator turnout was
24 up all over the country particularly in the minority
25 community because of Sen. Barack Obama. The point
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.512.474.2233
TX_00004101JA_003524
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 210-1 Filed 06/20/12 Page 248 of 248