Upload
amia-hogan
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
State of Indiana State of Indiana
Child Care Development Fund Electronic Time and Attendance - Payment System
Indiana’s CCDF HistoryIndiana’s CCDF History
Late 90’s – Contracted, locally controlledLate 90’s – Contracted, locally controlled
““Voucher Agents” determined eligibility, enrolled providers, AND paid Voucher Agents” determined eligibility, enrolled providers, AND paid providers. All data sent to state from 3 different software systems providers. All data sent to state from 3 different software systems through bi-weekly extractsthrough bi-weekly extracts
2001 – Agency began planning for new business structure2001 – Agency began planning for new business structure
Separation of eligibility and payment Separation of eligibility and payment
Contracted, but state controlledContracted, but state controlled
Web based systems were desiredWeb based systems were desired
2003 – Completed rollout of web based intake system2003 – Completed rollout of web based intake system
2004 – Completed rollout of electronic, time/attendance system2004 – Completed rollout of electronic, time/attendance system
Indiana Child Care Indiana Child Care
EnvironmentEnvironment• Absence of direct contracts with providers (other states do have)
• Varying types of care (approx. numbers)License Centers (620) Licensed Home (2,500)
Registered Ministries (640) Contract Centers (60)Home Exempt (2-5000) Center Exempt (3-500)
• “Minimum Standards” Statute – requirements to receive CCDF payments
• $142 Million direct service budget • 17,000 families; 33,000 children
Electronic System RationaleElectronic System Rationale
Goals:Goals:EliminateEliminate paper based voucher systempaper based voucher systemReduce potential for fraud and wasteReduce potential for fraud and waste
Increase program dollarsIncrease program dollars
Also Get:Also Get:More accurate time and attendance dataMore accurate time and attendance data
More accurate provider payments – pay only for actual More accurate provider payments – pay only for actual services renderedservices rendered
More accurate financial controls More accurate financial controls
ACCOUNTABILITY!!ACCOUNTABILITY!!
Other BenefitsOther Benefits
Real time informationReal time information
ExpendituresExpenditures Provider ActivityProvider Activity
Case activityCase activity Multiple reporting layersMultiple reporting layers
Monitoring from central officeMonitoring from central office
No paper checks in mailNo paper checks in mail
Promote parental self-sufficiency goalsPromote parental self-sufficiency goals
Identify underused dollarsIdentify underused dollars
In a nutshell, what is it?In a nutshell, what is it?
The electronic capturing child care services rendered The electronic capturing child care services rendered using “commercial” using “commercial” stylestyle environment environmentPOS – Point of Service vs. Point of SalePOS – Point of Service vs. Point of SaleMagnetic Stripe Card – like your debit cardMagnetic Stripe Card – like your debit cardIn our system – the card currently has no value – time in In our system – the card currently has no value – time in and time outand time outAttendance recorded each 2 week service period is used Attendance recorded each 2 week service period is used to calculate payment due to providerto calculate payment due to providerPayments made bi-weekly, via ACH direct deposit Payments made bi-weekly, via ACH direct deposit The two systems (eligibility and T/A-Payment “talk to The two systems (eligibility and T/A-Payment “talk to each other” – file interfacing. each other” – file interfacing.
Main PreparationsMain Preparations
Coding of current Indiana business rules. Coding of current Indiana business rules. System had to enforce those.System had to enforce those.
System interfacing between eligibility and T/A-System interfacing between eligibility and T/A-Payment system – file transfers, acceptancePayment system – file transfers, acceptance
Training – State personnel, all providers and Training – State personnel, all providers and clients in “waves”. Now done one-to-one as clients in “waves”. Now done one-to-one as participants are added to the programparticipants are added to the program
System rolled out geographically in waves after System rolled out geographically in waves after initial 3 county pilotinitial 3 county pilot
Challenges Challenges
Initial provider aversion Initial provider aversion Parental commitment – T/A can be burdensome Parental commitment – T/A can be burdensome in the “real world” for many reasons (lines at in the “real world” for many reasons (lines at larger providers, before and after school care, larger providers, before and after school care, “exceptions”, “I forgot my card”“exceptions”, “I forgot my card”No cash value to card – willingness to give the No cash value to card – willingness to give the card to providers for “convenience”card to providers for “convenience”The “Swipe Card Police” – warning letters, fraud The “Swipe Card Police” – warning letters, fraud investigations investigations DISCREPANCIES DISCREPANCIES
The Future for IndianaThe Future for Indiana
CONSOLIDATION!!CONSOLIDATION!!ConvenienceConvenienceFocus on like/same agency programs for Focus on like/same agency programs for
nownowOptions other than T/A – different payment Options other than T/A – different payment
or benefit issuance models or benefit issuance models Biometrics (Fingertip, photos)Biometrics (Fingertip, photos)