State Labour Service Inspection Activity Strategic Plan

This Project is funded by the European Union

This Project is implemented by the International Labour Organization

EU-ILO Project ENHANCING THE LABOUR ADMINISTRATION CAPACITY

TO IMPROVE WORKING CONDITIONS AND TACKLE UNDECLARED WORK

State Labour Service Inspection Activity Strategic Plan

Training workshop

24-25 September 2019

CONTENTS

1. Training workshop objectives and expected results _______________5

2. The Portuguese labour inspection planning system ______________10

3. State Labour Service inspection activity strategic plan ____________40

4. Templates for the strategic planning of labour inspection activity___60

3

4

EU-IL

O P

roje

ct

«Enh

anci

ng th

e la

bour

adm

inist

ratio

n ca

paci

ty

to im

prov

e w

orki

ng c

ondi

tions

and

tack

le u

ndec

lare

d w

ork»

Антоніу Са

нтуш

/ Ant

ónio

San

tos

Мен

еджер

про

екту

/ Pro

ject

man

ager

Trai

ning

wor

ksho

p| 2

4-25

Sep

tem

ber 2

019

SLS

Insp

ecti

on A

ctiv

ity

Stra

tegi

c Pl

anW

orks

hop

Obj

ecti

ves

and

Expe

cted

Res

ults

5

Cont

ent

Obj

ectiv

es

Expe

cted

resu

lts

Wor

kpl

an

6

Obj

ecti

ves

Lear

nto

app

lyst

rate

gic

thin

king

and

met

hodo

logi

esto

Lab

our

Insp

ecti

onA

ctiv

ity

Stra

tegi

cPl

anni

ng

Dev

elop

stra

tegi

cth

inki

ng

Revi

ewst

rate

gyco

ncep

tsan

dap

plic

atio

ns

7

Expe

cted

resu

lts

1•

Und

erst

and

the

need

for

form

ulat

ing

and

impl

emen

ting

a la

bour

insp

ectio

nac

tivity

stra

tegi

cpl

an

2•

Lear

nho

wto

form

ulat

ea

stra

tegi

cpl

anfo

r lab

our

insp

ectio

nac

tivity

3

•Cl

arify

the

mis

sion

and

visi

onof

SLS

•Es

tabl

ish

corp

orat

est

rate

gic

obje

ctiv

esfo

r la

bour

insp

ectio

nac

tivity

•D

efin

e op

erat

iona

lobj

ectiv

esfo

r cor

pora

teSB

U’s

•Le

arn

how

to d

issa

greg

ate

corp

orat

eSB

U’s

oper

atio

nalo

bjec

tives

into

terr

itori

al u

nit’s

obje

ctiv

esan

dla

bour

insp

ecto

r’s

obje

ctiv

es

8

Wor

kpl

an

1 –

Wor

ksho

p pu

rpos

esan

dw

ork

plan

•Obj

ectiv

es•R

esul

ts•W

ork

plan

2 -L

abou

rin

spec

tion

ac

tivi

ty s

trat

egic

pla

n

•ACT

cas

e st

udy

3 -S

LS L

abou

rin

spec

tion

act

ivit

y st

rate

gic

plan

•How

to d

o it

4 -C

orpo

rate

St

rate

gic

Obj

ecti

ves

•Mis

sion

& V

isio

n•C

orpo

rate

Effe

ctiv

enes

sSt

rate

gic

Obj

ectiv

es

5 -C

orpo

rate

St

rate

gic

Obj

ecti

ves

•Cor

pora

te E

ffic

ienc

yan

d Q

ualit

y St

rate

gic

Obj

ectiv

es

10 -

Wra

p up

and

cl

osur

e •Sum

mar

yof

mai

nta

keov

ers

9 -T

erri

tori

al U

nit’

s an

d La

bour

Insp

ecto

r’s

Obj

ecti

ves

•Dis

aggr

egat

ion

ofCo

rpor

ate

SBU

’sO

bjec

tives

into

Terr

itori

al U

nit’

san

d La

bour

Insp

ecto

r’s

obje

ctiv

es

8-Co

rpor

ate

SBU

’sO

pera

tion

alO

bjec

tive

s

•SBU

’s Q

ualit

yO

pera

tiona

l O

bjec

tives

7-Co

rpor

ate

SBU

’sO

pera

tion

alO

bjec

tive

s

•SBU

’s E

ffic

ienc

yO

pera

tiona

l O

bjec

tives

6 -C

orpo

rate

SBU

’s

Ope

rati

onal

O

bjec

tive

s

•SBU

’s E

ffec

tiven

ess

Ope

ratio

nal

Obj

ectiv

es

9

EU‐IL

O P

roje

ct

«Enh

anci

ng th

e la

bour a

dmin

istra

tion

capa

city

to im

prov

e w

orki

ng c

ondi

tions a

nd ta

ckle u

ndec

lare

d w

ork»

Антоніу Са

нтуш

/ Ant

ónio S

anto

s Мен

еджер

про

екту

/ Pro

ject m

anag

er

Trai

ning w

orks

hop| 24‐25

September 2

019

The Portuguese labour inspection planning system

10

Content

1.I

ntr

odu

ctio

n;

2.M

issi

on &

Vis

ion

;

3.A

ssig

nm

ent/

mis

sion

let

ter

and

obje

ctiv

es;

4. Q

UA

R –

fram

ewor

k of

eva

luat

ion

an

dac

cou

nta

bili

ty;

5.P

lan

nin

g t

he

imp

lem

enta

tion

–p

rog

ram

min

g a

ctiv

itie

s an

d p

roje

cts;

6.U

nfo

ld t

he

obje

ctiv

es;

7.E

valu

atio

n o

f A

CT

and

lab

our

insp

ecto

rs.

11

1.Introduction

Str

ateg

ic m

anag

emen

t is

a

dyna

mic

and

con

tinuo

us p

roce

ss

that

, ba

sed

on s

trat

egic

thi

nkin

g of

th

e m

embe

rs o

f th

e or

gani

zatio

n -

taki

ng in

to a

ccou

nt in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

ana

lysi

s -

form

ulat

es

stra

tegy

, se

ts g

oals

, de

fines

how

th

ey s

houl

d be

att

aine

d,

impl

emen

ts t

he m

easu

res

to

achi

eve

them

and

mon

itors

the

pe

rfor

man

ce.

12

The

reso

urce

s ar

e al

way

s lim

ited.

Str

ateg

ic p

lann

ing

allo

ws

us t

o op

timiz

e th

e hu

man

and

mat

eria

l res

ourc

es -

by p

rom

otin

g ef

ficie

ncy

and

effe

ctiv

enes

s -

to a

chie

ve g

oals

.

Effe

ctiv

enes

s-

Mea

suring

the

deg

ree

of

achi

evem

ent

of o

bjec

tives

.

Effi

cien

cy-

Mea

sure

men

t of

the

leve

l of

use

of r

esou

rces

to

achi

eve

the

goal

s.

So,

it is

nec

essa

ry t

o de

velo

p a

stra

tegy

and

im

plem

ent

it.

1.Introduction

13

The

easi

est

way

to

defin

e a

stra

tegi

c pl

an is

to

answ

er t

o 4

sim

ple

ques

tions

:

•Whe

re a

re w

e?•W

here

do

we

wan

t to

go?

•How

to

get

ther

e?•H

ow d

o w

e kn

ow t

hat

we

arrive

d?

1.Introduction

14

1.Introduction

Mission

Letter

•Evaluatio

nof

theAC

TDirectorate

•5 years

SIAD

AP

1

•QUA

R•Evaluatio

nof

theen

tire

organizatio

n•Yearly

SIAD

AP

2

•Evaluatio

nof m

anagers

(and

areas)

•2 years

SIAD

AP

3

SIADAP‐Integrated

Managem

ent a

nd Perform

ance Assessm

ent System in

Pub

lic Adm

inistratio

nQUAR–Evaluatio

nandAccoun

tabilityFamew

ork

•Evaluation of

public officials

•2 years

Lawno. 66‐B/2007, o

f28 December

15

2.M

ission & Vision

Mis

sion

is t

he p

urpo

se o

r th

e re

ason

for

th

e ex

iste

nce

of a

n or

gani

zatio

n, a

nd

give

s di

rect

ion

and

mea

ning

to

its

exis

tenc

e.

The

stra

tegy

is a

imed

at

ensu

re t

he

acco

mpl

ishm

ent

of t

he o

rgan

izat

ion’

s m

issi

on (

mat

eria

lizin

g it)

with

the

utm

ost

effe

ctiv

enes

s an

d ef

ficie

ncy.

The

mis

sion

of

the

Au

thor

ity

for

the

Wor

kin

g C

ond

itio

ns

(AC

T)is

“To

pr

omot

e th

e im

prov

emen

t of

wor

king

co

nditi

ons”

.

16

2.M

ission & Vision

Vis

ion

is a

cle

ar a

nd c

ompr

ehen

sive

‘sna

psho

t’ of

the

or

gani

zatio

n at

sam

e po

int

in t

he fut

ure.

It

desc

ribe

s:

•w

hat

the

orga

niza

tion

need

s to

be

like

to b

e su

cces

sful

inth

e fu

ture

.•

wh

atth

e or

gani

zatio

n is

try

ing

to a

chie

ve in

the

fut

ure.

It is

the

beg

inni

ng a

nd t

he e

nd r

esul

t of

the

Str

ateg

ic P

lann

ing

Proc

ess.

The

Vis

ion

of

the

Au

thor

ity

for

the

Wor

kin

g C

ond

itio

ns

(AC

T)is

“Con

solid

atio

n of

the

ACT

as a

pub

lic e

ntity

of

refe

renc

e in

civ

il so

ciet

y an

d in

the

wor

ld o

f w

ork,

in p

rom

otin

g eq

ual o

ppor

tuni

ties,

sus

tain

able

dev

elop

men

t an

d im

prov

ing

the

leve

l of sa

fety

, he

alth

and

wel

fare

in t

he w

ork

of c

itize

ns”.

17

3.M

ission letter an

d objectives

Mis

sion

let

ter:

•D

ocum

ent

hand

ed o

ver

by t

hego

vern

men

t to

Ins

pect

or G

ener

alan

d D

eput

y In

spec

tor

Gen

eral

to

sign

(as

a pr

e re

quirem

ent

for

taki

ngof

fice

and

as t

he b

asis

for

perf

orm

ance

ass

essm

ent)

.•

Con

tain

s: M

issi

on,

mai

n se

rvic

espr

ovid

ed,

stra

tegi

c pr

ioritie

s,ob

ject

ives

to

be a

chie

ved

and

nece

ssar

y re

sour

ces.

•It

cov

ers

the

dura

tion

of t

heIn

spec

tor

Gen

eral

and

its

depu

ties

com

mis

sion

(5

year

s).

18

3.M

ission letter an

d objectives

On

the

basi

s of

the

mis

sion

lett

er,

ACT

Direc

tora

te

lays

dow

n th

e sp

ecifi

c ob

ject

ives

for

eac

h ye

ar,

follo

win

g an

inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l ana

lysi

s pr

oces

s, in

clud

ing:

•Th

e so

cial

par

tner

s (w

ithin

ACT’

s Adv

isor

yCom

mitt

ee);

•Th

e or

gani

zatio

n an

d th

eir

mid

dle

man

ager

s;•

The

offic

ials

bel

ow m

iddl

e m

anag

ers;

•W

ork

acci

dent

and

occ

upat

iona

l dis

ease

sst

atis

tics;

•Th

e re

port

of ac

tiviti

es o

f th

e pr

evio

us y

ear;

•Va

riou

s na

tiona

l and

inte

rnat

iona

l str

ateg

ies,

plan

s an

d re

fere

nce

docu

men

ts o

n La

bour

Rela

tions

and

OSH

, fr

om E

U,

ILO

and

gove

rnm

ent.

19

3.M

ission letter an

d objectives

The

eval

uatio

n cy

cle

of t

he A

CT

Direc

tora

te (

Insp

ecto

r-G

ener

al a

nd 2

D

eput

ies)

is 5

yea

rs –

Mis

sion

lett

er;

The

eval

uatio

n cy

cle

of t

he o

rgan

izat

ion

is 1

yea

r (t

hrou

gh Q

UAR);

The

eval

uatio

n cy

cle

of t

he m

iddl

e m

anag

emen

t an

d al

l the

civ

il se

rvan

ts is

2

year

s (t

hrou

gh e

valu

atio

n fo

rms)

.

Ther

efor

e, t

he

obje

ctiv

es f

or la

bou

r in

spec

tors

are

est

ablis

hed

als

o fo

r 2

ye

ars.

20

The

perf

orm

ance

eva

luat

ion

of e

ach

orga

niza

tion

is b

ased

on

the

QU

AR,

whi

ch m

ust

have

:

•Th

e m

issi

on;

•M

ulti-

year

str

ateg

ic o

bjec

tives

det

erm

ined

in t

he m

issi

onle

tter

;•

The

obje

ctiv

es s

et f

or e

ach

year

;•

Perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd t

heir s

ourc

es o

f ve

rific

atio

n;•

The

mea

ns a

vaila

ble

(brief

ly r

efer

red)

;•

The

degr

ee o

f ac

hiev

emen

t of

the

res

ults

obt

aine

d in

pur

suit

of t

he o

bjec

tives

;•

Iden

tific

atio

n of

gap

s an

d th

eir

caus

es;

•Th

e fin

al e

valu

atio

n of

the

per

form

ance

of

the

orga

niza

tion.

4.Q

UAR‐Evaluation and Accountability Framework

21

4.Q


1.

Str

ateg

icob

ject

ives

are

set

-ta

king

into

acc

ount

: m

issi

on,

visi

on a

ndco

ntex

t of

the

org

aniz

atio

n;

2.Str

ateg

ic o

bjec

tives

are

bro

ken

dow

nin

to o

per

atio

nal

ob

ject

ives

.

3.

Op

erat

ion

al o

bje

ctiv

es a

re d

efin

ed in

term

s of

:

•Ef

fect

iven

ess

obje

ctiv

es;

•Ef

fici

ency

obje

ctiv

es;

and

•Q

ual

ity

obje

ctiv

es.

22

Effe

ctiv

enes

s-

40%

•

Perf

orm

with

eff

ectiv

enes

s th

e ac

tion

of in

spec

tion

in c

ompa

nies

/co

nstr

uctio

n si

tes/

wor

kpla

ces

with

app

ropr

iate

pro

cedu

res

-50

%.

•Re

spon

d qu

ickl

y to

a m

inim

um n

umbe

r of

req

uest

s fo

r au

thor

izat

ion

proc

edur

es f

or h

ealth

and

saf

ety

at w

ork

-50

%.

Effi

cien

cy-

30%

•Re

spon

d qu

ickl

y to

req

uest

s fo

r in

spec

tion

inte

rven

tion

on u

ndec

lare

d an

dirre

gula

r w

ork,

equ

ality

and

non

-dis

crim

inat

ion,

wor

k of

imm

igra

nts

and

unde

r bu

sine

ss c

risi

s -

30%

•Re

spon

d qu

ickl

y to

req

uest

s fo

r au

thor

izat

ion

/ ce

rtifi

catio

n, in

pro

cedu

res

rela

ting

to s

afet

y at

wor

k -

30%

•Im

plem

ent

hum

an r

esou

rces

man

agem

ent

mec

hani

sms

-20

%•

Impr

ove

inte

rnal

con

trol

sys

tem

-20

%Q

ual

ity

-30

%•

Coh

eren

ce o

f in

form

atio

n pr

ovid

ed t

o w

orke

rs a

nd e

mpl

oyer

s on

labo

urle

gisl

atio

n, p

rom

otin

g co

mpl

ianc

e -

25%

•D

iscl

ose

mor

e in

form

atio

n fo

r w

orke

rs a

nd e

mpl

oyer

s on

labo

ur le

gisl

atio

n,pr

omot

ing

com

plia

nce

-25

%•

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of u

pdat

ed c

onte

nt o

n th

e el

ectr

onic

web

page

-25

%•

Impr

ove

the

skill

s of

wor

kers

-25

%

Op

erat

ion

alO

bje

ctiv

es

Str

ateg

ic

obje

ctiv

es

A.T

o p

rom

ote

red

uct

ion

of

fata

l w

ork

acci

den

ts;

B.T

o p

rom

ote

red

uct

ion

of

un

dec

lare

dw

ork

and

rela

ted

ph

enom

ena.

4.Q


23

4.Q


24

The

pla

nn

ing

also

invo

lves

pro

gra

mm

ing

the

imp

lem

enta

tion

:

1.O

rgan

izin

gan

dal

loca

ting

the

nece

ssar

yre

sour

ces

and

time;

2.Pr

ogra

mm

ing

the

activ

ities

and

proj

ects

.

5.P

lanning the im

plementation –Program

ming activities an

d projects

25

5.P

lanning the im

plementation –Program

ming activities an

d projects

Str

ateg

ic &

O

pera

tiona

l O

bjec

tives A

ctiv

ities

/Act

ion

Plan

/ P

rogr

amm

es Proj

ects

/ Act

iviti

es Act

ivity

she

ets

and

eval

uatio

nfo

rms

26

•W

eha

ve o

pera

tiona

lobj

ectiv

es,

whi

chha

vesp

ecifi

cin

dica

tors

;•

We

have

num

bers

that

mus

t be

resp

ecte

dan

d, if

pos

sibl

e, e

xcee

ded;

•W

ekn

ow w

hich

sect

ors

and

prio

rity

area

s of

inte

rven

tion;

•W

eal

read

ykn

ow w

hich

orga

niza

tiona

luni

tssh

ould

cont

ribu

teto

eac

hgo

al.

It is

, th

en,

nece

ssar

yto

thi

nkab

out

proj

ects

/ ac

tiviti

esth

atm

ake

poss

ible

to

reac

hth

e ob

ject

ives

.

6.U

nfold the objectives

27

6.U


Rel

atio

nshi

p be

twee

n pr

ojec

ts a

nd

oper

atio

nal o

bjec

tives

28

6.U


29

6.U


30

6.U


Fina

lly,

the

figur

es

mus

t be

dist

ribu

ted

byth

eACT’

s:•

Terr

itorial

uni

ts•

Labo

ur in

spec

tors

OBJE

CTI

VE

-pe

rfor

m

with

effec

tiven

ess

the

labo

ur in

spec

tions

in

com

pani

es /

con

stru

ctio

n si

tes

/ w

orkp

lace

s w

ith

appr

opriat

e pr

oced

ures

.

IND

-

Num

ber

of

insp

ectio

n ac

tiviti

esde

velo

ped

in

com

pani

es/

site

s /

wor

kpla

ces

–38

.000

We

alre

ady

have

se

lect

edpr

ojec

ts/

activ

ities

31

6.U


Terri

toria

l Uni

tIn

dica

tor

1 LR

Indi

cato

r2OS

HIn

dica

tor3

Cam

pain

.In

dica

tor4

Civ.

Cons

tr.In

dica

tor5

Tran

sp.

Indi

cato

r6In

form

at.

Indi

cato

r7Pr

oces

s.Sa

nctio

ns

CL Pen

. Setúb

al696

696

62

93

15.464

21.600

675

CL Baixo

Vouga

1.005

1.005

89

134

22.337

31.200

975

CL Barreiro

309

309

27

41

6.873

9.600

300

UL Lit B

aixo

Alentejo

619

619

55

82

13.746

19.200

600

UL Braga

1.082

1.082

96

144

24.055

33.600

1050

32

7.Evaluation of ACT an

d labourinspectors

The

indi

vidu

al e

valu

atio

n (o

d la

bour

insp

ecto

rs a

nd r

emai

ning

sta

ff)

is b

ased

on

obje

ctiv

esan

d co

mp

eten

ces

(Top

man

agem

ent

are

eval

uate

dby

QU

AR an

dm

issi

on le

tter

).

3-5

ob

ject

ives

and

a m

inim

um

of

5 c

omp

eten

ces

are

set

for

each

labo

urin

spec

tor

Sco

res

for

obje

ctiv

es:

•An

obje

ctiv

e th

at w

as s

uppl

ante

d -

5 po

ints

;•

An

obje

ctiv

e ac

hiev

ed -

3 po

ints

; an

d•

An

obje

ctiv

e di

d no

t re

ach

-1

poin

t.

Sco

res

for

com

pet

ence

s:

•A c

ompe

tenc

e de

mon

stra

ted

at a

hig

h le

vel -

5 po

ints

;•

A c

ompe

tenc

e si

mpl

y de

mon

stra

ted

-3

poin

ts;

and

•a

non-

exis

tent

com

pete

nce

-sc

ore

of 1

poi

nt.

33

Man

dato

ry c

ompe

tenc

es

esta

blis

hed

for

each

Por

tugu

ese

labo

ur in

spec

tor

incl

ude:

•O

rien

tatio

n to

war

ds t

he r

esul

ts;

•O

rien

tatio

n fo

r th

e pu

blic

ser

vice

;•

Expe

rtis

e an

d ex

perien

ce;

•Ada

ptat

ion

and

cont

inuo

us im

prov

emen

t;•

Resp

onsi

bilit

y an

d co

mm

itmen

t to

pub

licse

rvic

e;•

Inte

rper

sona

l rel

atio

nshi

p;•

T eam

wor

k an

d co

oper

atio

n.


d labourinspectors

34


d labourinspectors

35


d labourinspectors

36


d labourinspectors

37


d labourinspectors

38


d labourinspectors

Su

mm

ary

Op

erat

ion

aliz

ati

on

Dia

gnos

ticM

issi

on

Vis

ion

Str

ateg

y

Str

ateg

ic o

bjec

tives

Goa

lsAct

iviti

es P

lan

and

Act

ion

Prog

ram

s

Str

ateg

icPr

ojet

s

Eval

uatio

n an

d m

onito

ring

Ope

ratio

nal

obje

ctiv

es

Wha

tw

ene

edto

ach

ieve

How

do

we

achi

eve

the

goal

s

Wha

tar

e th

e ob

ject

ives

we

have

to

achi

eve

How

to

mea

sure

obje

ctiv

es

Wha

tw

ene

edto

do

Mon

itor

to e

nsur

eth

e ac

com

plis

hmen

tof

obj

ectiv

es.

Whe

rear

e w

e

Str

ateg

icch

alle

ng

e

Act

ion

QU

AR

SIA

DAP

2 SIA

DAP

3

Perf

orm

ance

Indi

cato

rs

Why

we

exis

t

Act

ion

39

EU-IL

O P

roje

ct

«Enh

anci

ng th

e la

bour

adm

inist

ratio

n ca

paci

ty

to im

prov

e w

orki

ng c

ondi

tions

and

tack

le u

ndec

lare

d w

ork»

Антоніу Са

нтуш

/ Ant

ónio

San

tos

Мен

еджер

про

екту

/ Pro

ject

man

ager

Trai

ning

wor

ksho

p| 2

4-25

Sep

tem

ber 2

019

SLS

Insp

ecti

on A

ctiv

ity

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

40

Cont

ent

Stra

tegy

conc

epta

ndpr

oces

s

Corp

orat

e M

issi

on a

nd V

isio

n

Def

initi

onof

prio

rita

rypr

oble

ms

/ ch

alle

nges

(Foc

us)

Corp

orat

e St

rate

gic

Obj

ectiv

es

Corp

orat

eSB

U’s

Ope

ratio

nalO

bjec

tives

Dis

aggr

egat

ion

ofCo

rpor

ate

Obj

ectiv

esfo

r SB

Us

and

Staf

f

1 2 3 4 5 6

41

Stra

tegy

–so

me

man

agem

ent d

efin

itio

ns

Def

init

ions

Aut

hors

Det

erm

inin

g th

e go

als

and

long

-ter

m o

bjec

tives

of a

n or

gani

zatio

n an

d th

e ad

optio

n of

mea

ns o

f ac

tion

and

allo

cati

onof

res

ourc

esne

eded

to a

chie

ve th

ese

goal

sA

lfred

Cha

ndle

r

Patt

ern

of d

ecis

ions

con

cern

ing

key

obje

ctiv

es, p

olic

ies

and

acti

onse

quen

ce, w

ith h

igh

pote

ntia

l ef

fect

s on

the

viab

ility

and

dir

ecti

onof

the

com

pany

as

a w

hole

, or t

hat d

eter

min

e its

com

peti

tive

posi

tion

ing

for a

pro

long

ed p

erio

d tim

eJa

mes

Bri

an Q

uinn

Uni

fied,

inte

grat

ed a

nd c

ompr

ehen

sive

pla

n, d

esig

ned

to e

nsur

e th

at th

e ba

sic

obje

ctiv

esof

the

orga

niza

tion

are

achi

eved

Will

iam

Glu

eck

Crea

tion

of a

mat

ch b

etw

een

the

acti

viti

esof

the

orga

niza

tion

in s

earc

h of

a fa

vora

ble

com

peti

tive

posi

tion

in a

n in

dust

ry a

gain

stth

e fo

rces

that

sha

pe th

e co

mpe

titi

onan

d pr

ofita

bilit

y in

that

indu

stry

Mic

hael

Por

ter

Plan

that

brin

gs to

geth

er, i

n an

inte

grat

ed m

anne

r, th

e ob

ject

ives

, pol

icie

san

d ac

tion

sof

the

Org

aniz

atio

n, a

imed

at c

reat

ing

a su

stai

nabl

e co

mpe

titi

vead

vant

age

Adr

iano

Fre

ire

Plan

, roa

d, p

ath,

gui

deor

cou

rse

of a

ctio

nfo

r the

futu

reH

enry

Min

tzbe

rg

Line

of a

ctio

nof

an

orga

niza

tion

in o

rder

to a

chie

ve th

eir p

urpo

ses

De

Wit

e M

eyer

Patt

ern

of o

bjec

tive

san

d m

ajor

pol

icie

sto

ach

ieve

them

, exp

ress

ed s

o as

to d

efin

e w

hat

busi

ness

the

com

pany

is o

r sho

uld

be in

and

the

kin

d of

com

pany

that

it is

or s

houl

d be

Kenn

eth

And

rew

s

The

deci

sion

on

whe

reto

figh

tth

e en

emy

(i.e.

, the

com

petit

ion)

Vasc

once

llos

e Sá

42

Stra

tegy

–no

con

sens

us o

n th

e de

finit

ion

Stra

tegy

Path

, di

rect

ion

Patt

ern

(ofa

ctio

ns,

deci

sion

s,

obje

ctiv

es)

Set o

fac

tion

san

dde

cisi

ons

Whe

re

Figh

tag

ains

t…

Plan

s

Polic

ies

Com

peti

tion

(ene

my)

Obj

ecti

ves

and

targ

ets

Line

(of

orie

ntat

ion,

ac

tion

)

43

Stra

tegy

–th

e re

turn

to o

rigi

ns: m

ilita

ry s

cien

ce

Mili

tary

defin

itio

nsA

utho

r

The

answ

er to

the

ques

tions

“w

here

” an

d “w

hen”

Attil

a (K

ing

of

the

Hun

s)

The

mom

ent,

the

plac

e an

d th

e ne

cess

ary

forc

esCa

rl v

onCl

ause

witz

The

art o

f dis

trib

utin

g an

d ap

plyi

ng m

ilita

ry m

eans

as

a w

ay o

f ach

ievi

ng th

e ul

timat

e po

licy

Sir B

asil

Hen

ry

Lidd

ellH

art

Etym

olog

ical

ly, t

he w

ord

stra

tegy

deri

ves

from

th

e G

reek

wor

d στρα

τηγό

ς(s

trat

egos

) whi

ch

mea

ns “

gene

ral”

or

“the

art

of t

he g

ener

al”

44

Stra

tegy

–Fo

cus

/ Co

ncen

trat

ion

offo

rces

(res

ourc

es)

45

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an –

a sy

nthe

sis

Stra

tegy

Whe

reH

owPl

an

Focu

s

Iden

tific

atio

nof

prio

trit

ary

prob

lem

s/

chal

leng

es

Def

init

ion

of S

trat

egic

an

d op

erat

iona

l ob

ject

ives

, in

term

s of

: -E

ffec

tive

ness

-Eff

icie

ncy

-Qua

lity

46

Stra

tegy

For

mul

atio

n -P

roce

ss

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

and

Vis

ion

2.

Focu

s: Id

enti

fypr

iori

tary

prob

lem

s/ch

alle

nge

s(c

onsi

deri

ngth

eM

issi

onan

dV

isio

n)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tive

s

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

rati

onal

Obj

ecti

ves

(per

SB

U)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in

casc

ade

(for

lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

47

1.Co

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

&

Vis

ion

2.

Focu

s: Id

entif

ypr

iori

ties

(con

side

ring

the

Mis

sion

and

Visi

on)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

ratio

nal

Obj

ectiv

es(p

er

SBU

)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in

casc

ade

(for

lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

Mis

sion

-To

impr

ove

wor

king

con

diti

ons

in U

krai

ne, t

hrou

gh

the

prom

otio

n, m

onit

orin

g an

d en

forc

emen

t of l

abou

ran

d O

SH re

gula

tion

s

Vis

ion

-To

be s

een

as t

he m

ost e

ffec

tive

, eff

icie

nt a

nd re

liabl

e au

thor

ity

in U

krai

ne

48

2.Fo

cus:

pri

orit

ies

Prio

rita

ryPr

oble

ms

/ Ch

alle

nges

:

•Wor

k-re

late

dac

cide

nts

and

occu

pati

onal

dise

ases

•Bus

ines

s cr

ise

situ

atio

ns(w

age

arre

as)

•UD

W

•Lac

kof

trai

ning

ofL

I

•Adm

inis

trat

ive/

buro

crat

icbu

rden

s

•(La

bour

) ins

pect

ion

imag

e

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

&

Visi

on

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

riti

es(c

ons

ider

ing

the

Mis

sion

and

Vis

ion)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

ratio

nal

Obj

ectiv

es(p

er S

BU)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in

casc

ade

(for

lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

49

3.Co

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

s

SMA

RTO

BJEC

TIVE

S

Spec

ific

Mea

sura

ble

Ach

ieva

ble

Rele

vant

Tim

e-or

ient

edIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Def

ine

Corp

orat

eSt

rate

gic

Obj

ecti

ves,

in

term

sof

:

-Eff

ecti

vene

ss

-Eff

icie

ncy

-Qua

lity

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

ratio

nal

Obj

ectiv

es(p

er S

BU)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

50

3.Co

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

s

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tive

s

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

ratio

nal

Obj

ectiv

es(p

er S

BU)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

Effe

ctiv

enes

sEf

fici

ency

Qu

alit

y

Red

uce

inci

den

cera

tes

of

WR

A

and

OD

Tack

lesi

tuat

ion

sof

bu

sin

ess

cris

e

Red

uce

UD

W

•Var

iatio

nra

te o

fW

RA a

ndO

D in

cide

nce

rate

•Var

iatio

nra

te o

fno

. of

info

rmal

lyem

ploy

ed

•Var

iatio

nra

te o

nw

age

arre

ar’s

amou

nt

Dev

elop

lab

our

insp

ecti

on

staf

f

Sim

plif

yac

cess

to

serv

ices

and

com

plia

nce

•Ave

rage

no.

oftr

aini

ngho

urs

•D

emat

eria

lize

e mpl

oyer

s'm

anda

tory

notif

icat

ions

Imp

rove

in

tern

al a

nd

ex

tern

al im

age

of la

bou

rin

spec

tio

n

•Car

ry o

ut a

inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

lcl

ient

sat

isfa

ctio

n su

rvey

•Con

duct

a s

elf-

asse

ssm

ent,

usi

ngth

e EU

CAF

51

3.Co

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

s

OBJ

ECTI

VE

IND

ICA

TOR

BASE

LIN

ETA

RGET

SOU

RCE

OF

VER

IFIC

ATI

ON

EFFE

CTIV

ENES

S

SO.0

1 -T

o re

duce

the

inci

denc

e ra

te o

f Fat

al W

ork-

rela

ted

Acc

iden

ts a

nd

Occ

upat

iona

l Dis

ease

sVa

riat

ion

rate

of t

he in

cide

nce

rate

of f

atal

wor

k re

late

d ac

cide

nts

10%

-10%

SLS

data

SO.0

1 -T

o re

duce

the

inci

denc

e ra

te o

f Fat

al W

ork-

rela

ted

Acc

iden

ts a

nd

Occ

upat

iona

l Dis

ease

sVa

riat

ion

rate

of t

he in

cide

nce

rate

of c

onfir

med

occ

upat

iona

l dis

ease

s-6

%-1

0%SL

S da

ta

SO.0

2 -T

o ta

ckle

situ

atio

ns o

f bus

ines

s cr

isis

Vari

atio

n ra

te o

f the

am

ount

of w

age

arre

ars

2018

: 12%

[(2,

645,

121,

000-

2,36

8,39

6,00

0)/2

,368

,396

,000

]-1

0%SS

S da

ta

SO.0

3 -T

o re

duce

UD

WVa

riat

ion

rate

of t

he n

o. o

f inf

orm

ally

em

ploy

ed w

orke

rs20

18: -

4% [3

5413

00

(201

8)/3

6956

00 (2

017)

]-1

0%SS

S da

ta

EFFI

CIEN

CY

SO.0

4 -T

o de

velo

p la

bour

insp

ectio

n st

aff

Ave

rage

no.

of t

rain

ing

hour

s pr

ovid

ed to

labo

ur in

spec

tors

and

sup

port

sta

ff?

35SL

S re

cord

s

SO.0

5 -T

o si

mpl

ify a

cces

s to

ser

vice

s an

d co

mpl

ianc

eTo

dem

ater

ializ

e em

ploy

ers'

man

dato

ry n

otifi

catio

ns (e

.g.,

wor

k-re

late

d ac

cide

nts,

occ

upat

iona

l dis

ease

s, tr

ansp

ort e

quip

men

t, e

xplo

sive

mat

eria

l, et

c.)

thro

ugh

a w

eb-b

ased

tran

sact

iona

l pla

tfor

m.

by 3

1/12

/202

0SL

S re

cord

s

QU

ALI

TY

SO.0

6 -T

o im

prov

e in

tern

al a

nd e

xter

nal i

mag

e of

labo

urin

spec

tion

To c

arry

out

ain

tern

al a

nd e

xter

nal c

lient

sat

isfa

ctio

n su

rvey

by 3

1/12

/202

0SL

Sre

cord

s

SO.0

6 -T

o im

prov

e in

tern

al a

nd e

xter

nal i

mag

e of

labo

urin

spec

tion

To c

ondu

ct a

sel

f-as

sess

men

t, u

sing

the

EU C

omm

on A

sses

smen

t Fra

mew

ork

(CA

F)by

31/

12/2

020

SLS

reco

rds

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tive

s

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

ratio

nal

Obj

ectiv

es(p

er S

BU)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

52

4.Co

rpor

ate

Ope

rati

onal

Obj

ecti

ves

(per

SBU

)1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

rati

onal

Obj

ecti

ves

(per

SBU

)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

Lab

ou

r R

elat

ion

sS

afet

yat

Wor

kH

ealt

hat

Wor

k

Incr

ease

insp

ecti

on

visi

ts(I

Vs)

•N

o. o

fIV

s•

Var

iatio

nra

teof

no.

ofIV

s•

No.

em

ploy

ers

insp

ecte

d•

Var

iatio

non

no.

ofin

spec

ted

empl

oyer

s•

….

Effectiveness Efficiency Quality

Imp

rove

le

gal

fr

amew

or

k

Incr

ease

tech

nic

alad

vice

Focu

sIV

s

•Sha

re I

Vs

onU

DW

•N

o. I

Vs

onU

DW

•N

o.em

ploy

ers

insp

ecte

don

UD

W•

Sha

re o

fIv

son

wag

ear

rear

s•

…

•N

o. w

orke

rsad

vise

d•

No.

em

ploy

ers

advi

sed

•D

raft

LI s

tatu

te•

Inco

rpor

ate

R19

8•

Tran

spos

eEU

Direc

tives

Imp

rove

IV

’sef

fici

cen

cy

•N

o. I

V p

er L

I•

Avg

. no

. IV

son

UD

W p

er L

I•

Avg

. no

. of

IVs

onw

age

arre

ars

per

LI•

…

Red

uce

tim

e to

d

raft

leg

al

acts

Sim

plif

yW

ebp

age

FAQ

s

Targ

et

IVs

•Sha

re I

V o

nU

DW

mor

e pr

one

sect

ors

•N

o. o

fIV

on

UD

W m

ore

pron

ese

ctor

s

•Cla

ssify

and

diss

agre

gate

Web

site

FAQ

spe

r th

eme/

sub-

them

e

•Avg

. tim

e to

draf

tan

dsu

bmit

draf

tle

gal a

ct

Imp

rove

IV

’sim

pac

t

•Sha

re o

fw

orkp

lace

sw

ithvi

olat

ions

regu

larize

d•

Sha

re o

fde

tect

edU

DW

reg

ular

ized

•…

Imp

rove

co

mp

lain

t’s

resp

on

se

rate

Incr

ease

insp

ecti

on

pro

ced

ure

’sq

ual

ity

•Sha

re o

fno

tific

atio

nsco

mpl

ied

•Sha

re o

ffin

es p

aid

•…

.

•Sha

re o

ffo

rmal

com

plai

nts

trea

ted

Incr

ease

IVs

•N

o. o

fw

orkp

lace

sin

spec

ted

•Var

iatio

nof

no.

IV

onsa

fety

•N

o. o

fem

ploy

ers

insp

ecte

d•

….

Imp

rove

le

gal

fr

amew

ork

Incr

ease

tech

nic

alad

vice

Focu

sIV

s

•Sha

re o

fIV

to

cons

truc

tion

site

s•

No.

of

IV t

oco

nstr

uctio

nsi

tes

•Sha

re o

fiIV

onO

SH

ris

kas

sess

men

t•

…

•N

o. w

orke

rsad

vise

d•

No.

em

ploy

ers

advi

sed

•Tr

ansp

ose

EU D

irec

tives

Imp

rove

IV

’sef

fici

cen

cy

•N

o. w

orkp

lace

’sIV

spe

r LI

•Avg

. no

.Em

ploy

ers

insp

ecte

dpe

r LI

•…

Red

uce

tim

e to

d

raft

leg

al

acts

Targ

et

IVs

•Avg

. no

.ofIV

sto

fore

stry

wor

kpla

ces

per

LI•

Avg

. no

. IV

sto

cons

truc

tion

site

spe

r LI

•…

•Avg

. tim

e to

dra f

t/su

bmit

lega

l act

Imp

rove

IV

’sim

pac

t

•Sha

re o

fw

orkp

lace

sw

ithvi

olat

ions

regu

larize

d•

Sha

re o

ffo

llow

-up

visi

tsw

here

prio

r vi

olat

ions

wer

ere

gula

rize

d•

…

Imp

rove

co

mp

lain

t’s

resp

on

se r

ate

Incr

ease

insp

ecti

on

pro

ced

ure

’sq

ual

ity

•Sha

re o

fno

tific

atio

nsco

mpl

ied

•Sha

re o

ffin

es p

aid

•…

.

•Sha

re o

ffo

rmal

co

mpl

aint

str

eate

d

Incr

ease

WR

A

inve

stig

atio

ns

•N

o. o

fW

RA in

quirie

s•

Var

iatio

non

no.

WRA in

vest

igat

ed

Sim

plif

yco

mp

lian

ce

•N

o. E

U-O

SH

A O

iRA

tool

str

ansl

ated

Incr

ease

IVs

•N

o. o

fw

orkp

lace

sin

spec

ted

•Var

iatio

nof

no.

IVon

heal

th•

No.

of

empl

oyer

sin

spec

ted

•…

.In

crea

sece

rtif

ied

lab

orat

orie

s

Incr

ease

tech

nic

alad

vice

•N

o. w

orke

rsad

vise

d•

No.

em

ploy

ers

advi

sed

•N

o. o

fem

ploy

ers

cert

ified

Incr

ease

OD

in

vest

igat

ion

s

•Sha

re o

fre

ques

ted

OD

inqu

irie

sco

nduc

ted

Imp

rove

ef

fici

ency

ofW

RA

in

vest

igat

ion

s

•Avg

. no

. of

WRA in

vest

ig.

per

LI

Focu

sIV

s

•Sha

re o

fIV

sto

harm

fulw

orkp

lace

s•

No.

of

IVs

to h

ealth

care

wor

kpla

ces

•Sha

re o

fIV

son

MSD

•…

Incr

ease

cove

rag

ein

form

.•

No.

wor

kers

cove

red

•N

o.em

ploy

ers

cove

red

Incr

ease

wor

kca

teg

. st

atem

ents

•N

o. o

fis

sued

stat

emen

ts

Imp

rove

IV

’sef

fici

cen

cy

•N

o. w

orkp

lace

’sIv

s/LI

•N

o. I

Vs

to h

arm

ful

wor

kpla

ces/

LI•

…R

edu

ceti

me

dra

ftle

gal

act

s

Targ

et

IVs

•N

o. I

Vs

to h

ealth

care

wor

kpla

ces/

LI•

No.

of

IVs

tom

etal

lurg

ical

wor

kpla

ces/

LI•

…

•N

o. o

fO

iRA

tool

str

ansl

ated

Sim

plif

yco

mp

lian

ce

Imp

rove

OD

’sin

vest

ig.

effi

cien

cy

•Avg

. no

. of

OD

’sin

vest

ig./

LI

Imp

rove

w

ork

cate

g.

stat

emen

ts

•N

o. is

sued

per

LI

•D

raft

avg.

tim

e

Imp

rove

IV

’sim

pac

t

•Sha

re o

fw

orkp

lace

sw

ithvi

olat

ions

regu

larize

d•

Sha

re o

ffo

llow

-up

visi

tsw

here

prio

r vi

olat

ions

wer

ere

gula

rize

d•

…

Imp

rove

co

mp

lain

t’s

resp

on

se r

ate

Incr

ease

insp

ecti

on

pro

ced

ure

’sq

ual

ity

•Sha

re o

fno

tific

atio

nsco

mpl

ied

•Sha

re o

ffin

es p

aid

•…

.

•Sha

re o

ffo

rmal

com

plai

nts

trea

ted

Imp

rove

IV

’sim

pac

t

•Sha

re o

fw

orkp

lace

sw

ithvi

olat

ions

regu

larize

d•

Sha

re o

ffo

llow

-up

visi

tsw

here

prio

r vi

olat

ions

wer

ere

gula

rize

d•

…

53

1

4.Co

rpor

ate

Ope

rati

onal

Obj

ecti

ves

(per

SBU

)

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

rati

onal

Obj

ecti

ves

(per

SBU

)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

OBJ

ECTI

VE

IND

ICA

TOR

BASE

LIN

ETA

RGET

SOU

RCE

EFFE

CTIV

ENES

SO

O-L

R.01

-To

incr

ease

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of i

nspe

ctio

n vi

sits

on

labo

urre

latio

ns is

sues

20,4

4219

4,70

0SL

S da

taO

O-L

R.01

-To

incr

ease

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of e

mpl

oyer

s in

spec

ted

19,9

9719

9,03

3SL

S da

taO

O-L

R.02

-To

focu

s in

spec

tion

visi

tsSh

are

of in

spec

tion

visi

ts o

n U

DW

64%

40%

SLS

data

OO

-LR.

02 -T

o fo

cus

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of i

nspe

ctio

n vi

sits

on

UD

W13

,060

77,8

80SL

S da

taO

O-L

R.02

-To

focu

s in

spec

tion

visi

tsN

o. o

f em

ploy

ers

insp

ecte

d on

UD

W12

,641

80,4

61SL

S da

taO

O-L

R.03

-To

incr

ease

tech

nica

l adv

ice

prov

ided

No.

of w

orke

rs p

rovi

ded

with

tech

nica

l adv

ice

on la

bour

rela

tion

issu

es?

124,

608

SLS

data

OO

-LR.

04 -

To im

prov

e le

gal f

ram

ewor

k on

labo

ur re

latio

nsD

raft

/ s

ubm

it dr

aft l

aw e

stab

lishi

ng a

LI s

tatu

te a

ligne

d w

ith IL

O C

81

and

C129

.?

by th

e en

d of

202

0SL

S re

cord

s

EFFI

CIEN

CYO

O-L

R.05

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

eff

icie

ncy

No.

of i

nspe

ctio

n vi

sits

on

labo

urre

latio

ns p

er L

I29

(201

8)/1

5(20

19)

300

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-LR.

05 -

To im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's e

ffic

ienc

yA

vera

ge n

o. o

f ins

pect

ion

visi

ts o

n U

DW

per

LI

11(2

018)

/5(2

019)

120

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-LR.

05 -

To im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's e

ffic

ienc

yA

vera

ge n

o. o

f ins

pect

ion

visi

ts o

n w

age

arre

ars

per

LI1.

7(20

18)/

.75(

2019

) 60

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-LR.

06 -

To ta

rget

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

Shar

e of

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

on

UD

W m

ore

pron

e se

ctor

s (c

onst

ruct

ion,

ag

ricu

lture

, acc

omm

od. &

cat

erin

g an

d w

hole

sale

and

reta

il tr

ade)

.?

75%

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-LR.

07 -

To s

impl

ify th

e FA

Q's

info

rmat

ion

sect

ion

of W

ebpa

geCl

assi

fy a

nd d

isag

greg

ate

FAQ

s by

them

es a

nd s

ub-t

hem

esby

31/

12/2

020

SLS

Web

page

QU

ALI

TY

OO

-LR.

09 -

To im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's im

pact

Shar

e of

follo

w-u

p vi

sts

whe

re in

frig

emen

ts p

revi

ousl

y de

tect

ed w

ere

tota

lly re

gula

rize

d?

85%

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-LR.

09 -

To im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's im

pact

Shar

e of

det

ecte

d U

DW

regu

lari

zed

?10

0%SL

S re

cord

sO

O-L

R.09

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

impa

ctSh

are

of d

etec

ted

wag

e ar

reas

pai

ed to

wor

kers

12%

25%

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-LR.

10 -

To im

prov

e in

spec

tion

proc

edur

e's

qual

itySh

are

of fi

nanc

ial s

anct

ions

pai

d20

19: 9

674

fines

; 3%

pai

d (4

6605

000/

1650

0000

00)

50%

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-LR.

11 -

To im

prov

e co

mpl

aint

's r

espo

nse

rate

Shar

e of

labo

ur re

latio

n's

form

al c

ompl

aint

s tr

eate

d?

80%

SLS

reco

rds

SBU

#1

-Lab

our

Rela

tion

s

54

16

4.Co

rpor

ate

Ope

rati

onal

Obj

ecti

ves

(per

SBU

)

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

rati

onal

Obj

ecti

ves

(per

SBU

)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

SBU

#2

–Sa

fety

atW

ork

OBJ

ECTI

VE

IND

ICA

TOR

BASE

LIN

ETA

RGET

SOU

RCE

OF

VER

IFIC

ATI

ON

EFFE

CTIV

ENES

SO

O-S

W.0

1 -T

o in

crea

se in

spec

tion

visi

tsN

o. o

f wor

kpla

ces

insp

ecte

d on

saf

ety

at w

ork

45,4

9521

9,60

0SL

S da

taO

O-S

W.0

1 -T

o in

crea

se in

spec

tion

visi

tsN

o. o

f em

ploy

ers

insp

ecte

d on

saf

ety

at w

ork

20,5

9399

,400

SLS

data

OO

-SW

.02

-To

focu

s in

spec

tion

visi

tsSh

are

of s

afet

y in

spec

tion

visi

ts o

n co

nstr

uctio

n si

tes

?15

%SL

S da

taO

O-S

W.0

2 -T

o fo

cus

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of s

afet

y in

spec

tion

vis

its o

n oc

cupa

tiona

l ris

k as

sess

men

t?

65,8

80SL

S da

taO

O-S

W.0

3 -T

o in

crea

se te

chni

cal a

dvic

e pr

ovid

edN

o. o

f em

ploy

ers

prov

ided

with

tech

nica

l adv

ice

on s

afet

y at

wor

k?

140,

544

SLS

data

OO

-SW

.04

-To

impr

ove

lega

l fra

mew

ork

on O

SHD

raft

and

sub

mit

lega

l act

s tr

ansp

osin

g th

e EU

Dir

ectiv

es (o

r up

datin

g it)

: 89

/391

/EEC

, 89/

654/

EEC,

200

9/10

4/EC

, 92/

91/E

EC, 9

2/10

4/EE

C, 8

9/65

6/EE

C,

2003

/88/

EC, 9

2/57

/EEC

, 92/

58/E

EC, 1

999/

92/E

C, 9

1/38

3/EE

C, 9

2/85

/EEC

.?

by th

e en

d of

202

0SL

S re

cord

s

OO

-SW

.05

-To

incr

ease

no.

of i

nves

tigat

ed w

ork

acci

dent

sN

o. o

f fat

al a

nd n

on-f

atal

wor

k-re

late

d ac

cide

nts

inqu

irie

s co

nduc

ted

4,12

6(20

18)/

1,94

3(20

19)

8,05

2SL

S re

cord

sEF

FICI

ENCY

OO

-SW

.06

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

eff

icie

ncy

No.

of w

orkp

lace

's in

spec

tion

visi

ts o

n sa

fety

at w

ork

per

LI63

(201

8)/3

5(20

19)

300

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-SW

.06

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

eff

icie

ncy

No.

of e

mpl

oyer

s in

spec

ted

on s

afet

y at

wor

k pe

r LI

29(2

018)

/16(

2019

)13

6SL

S re

cord

s

OO

-SW

.06

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

eff

icie

ncy

Ave

rage

no.

of s

afet

y in

spec

tion

visi

ts o

n O

SH s

ervi

ces

orga

niza

tion

and

mea

ns

per

LI45

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-SW

.07

-To

targ

et in

spec

tion

visi

tsA

vera

ge n

o. o

f saf

ety

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

to tr

ansp

orta

tion

and

stor

age

sect

or

wor

kpla

ces

per

LI45

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-SW

.08

-To

impr

ove

wor

k ac

cide

nt's

inve

stig

atio

n ef

ficie

ncy

Ave

rage

no.

of w

ork

acci

dent

s in

vest

igat

ed p

er L

I5.

7 (2

018)

/2.7

(201

9)11

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-SW

.09

-To

redu

ce th

e av

erag

e tim

e to

dra

ft a

nd s

ubm

it le

gal a

cts

for

appr

oval

Ave

rage

tim

e fo

r dra

ftin

g an

d su

bmitt

ing

a le

gal a

ct?

1 m

onth

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-SW

.10

-To

sim

plify

and

faci

litat

e co

mpl

ianc

eN

o. o

f EU

-OSH

A "

Onl

ine

Inte

ract

ive

Risk

Ass

essm

ent"

(OiR

A)T

ools

tran

slat

ed

into

Ukr

aini

anna

4SL

S W

ebsi

te

QU

ALI

TY

OO

-SW

.11

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

impa

ctSh

are

of w

orkp

lace

s/em

ploy

ers

whe

re in

frig

emen

ts p

revi

ousl

y de

tect

ed w

ere

tota

lly re

gula

rize

d81

%85

%SL

S re

cord

s

OO

-SW

.12

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n pr

oced

ure'

s qu

ality

Shar

e of

not

ifica

tions

com

plie

d w

ith?

85%

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-SW

.13

-To

impr

ove

com

plai

nt's

resp

onse

rate

Shar

e of

labo

urre

latio

n's

form

al c

ompl

aint

s tr

eate

d?

80%

SLS

reco

rds

55

17

4.Co

rpor

ate

Ope

rati

onal

Obj

ecti

ves

(per

SBU

)

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

rati

onal

Obj

ecti

ves

(per

SBU

)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

SBU

#3

–H

ealt

hat

Wor

kO

BJEC

TIVE

IND

ICA

TOR

BASE

LIN

ETA

RGET

SOU

RCE

OF

VERI

FICA

TIO

NEF

FECT

IVEN

ESS

OO

-HW

.01

-To

incr

ease

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of w

orkp

lace

s in

spec

ted

on h

ealth

at w

ork

2500

(201

8)/1

734(

2019

)22

,272

SLS

data

OO

-HW

.01

-To

incr

ease

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of e

mpl

oyer

s in

spec

ted

on h

ealth

at w

ork

?10

,081

SLS

data

OO

-HW

.02

-To

focu

s in

spec

tion

visi

tsSh

are

of h

ealth

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

to h

arm

ful a

nd a

rduo

us c

ondi

tions

wor

kpla

ces

?25

%SL

S da

taO

O-H

W.0

2 -T

o fo

cus

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of h

ealth

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

to m

inin

g an

d qu

arry

ing

sect

or w

orkp

lace

s?

5,56

8SL

S da

taO

O-H

W.0

2 -T

o fo

cus

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of h

ealth

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

on

air

qua

lity

?5,

568

SLS

data

OO

-HW

.02

-To

focu

s in

spec

tion

visi

tsN

o. o

f hea

lth in

spec

tion

vis

its o

n th

e us

e of

che

mic

al a

gent

s?

5,56

8SL

S da

taO

O-H

W.0

2 -T

o fo

cus

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

Shar

e of

hea

lth in

spec

tion

visi

ts o

n M

uscu

losk

elet

al D

isor

der (

MSD

) ris

k fa

ctor

s?

15%

SLS

data

OO

-SW

.04

-To

impr

ove

lega

l fra

mew

ork

on O

SHD

raft

and

sub

mit

lega

l act

s tr

ansp

osin

g th

e EU

Dir

ectiv

es (o

r up

datin

g it)

: 89/

391/

EEC,

89

/654

/EEC

, 200

9/10

4/EC

, 92/

91/E

EC, 9

2/10

4/EE

C, 8

9/65

6/EE

C, 2

003/

88/E

C,

92/5

7/EE

C, 9

2/58

/EEC

, 199

9/92

/EC,

91/

383/

EEC,

92/

85/E

EC.

?by

the

end

of 2

020

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-HW

.05

-To

incr

ease

no.

of i

nves

tigat

ed o

ccup

atio

nal d

isea

ses

Shar

e of

requ

este

d oc

cupa

tiona

l dis

ease

s (O

D) i

nqui

ries

con

duct

ed20

18: 9

1.1%

(2,2

65/2

,484

); 20

19: 9

1.5%

(1,2

73/1

,391

) 95

%SL

S re

cord

s

OO

-HW

.06

-To

incr

ease

cov

erag

e of

info

rmat

ion

and

awar

enes

s-ra

isin

g ac

tiviti

es o

n O

D p

reve

ntio

nN

o. o

f wor

kers

cov

ered

?SL

S re

cord

s

OO

-HW

.07

-To

incr

ease

no.

of c

ertif

ied

labo

rato

ries

for h

ygie

nic

stud

ies

No.

of e

mpl

oyer

s ce

rtifi

ed20

18: 7

9/20

19: 8

030

0SL

S re

cord

sO

O-H

W.0

8 -T

o in

crea

se n

o. o

f Wor

ker

Cate

gory

Sta

tem

ents

(for

PM

E)N

o. o

f iss

ued

stat

emen

ts20

18:1

5,03

0/20

19:8

,421

33,4

08SL

S re

cord

sEF

FICI

ENCY

OO

-HW

.09

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

eff

icie

ncy

No.

of w

orkp

lace

's in

spec

tion

visi

ts o

n he

alth

at w

ork

per L

I23

(201

8)/1

5(20

19)

192

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-HW

.09

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

eff

icie

ncy

Ave

rage

no.

of h

ealth

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

on

nois

e ri

sk fa

ctor

s pe

r LI

? 29

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-HW

.14

-To

sim

plify

and

faci

litat

e co

mpl

ianc

eN

o. o

f EU

-OSH

A "

Onl

ine

Inte

ract

ive

Risk

Ass

essm

ent"

(OiR

A)T

ools

tran

slat

ed in

to

Ukr

aini

anna

4SL

S W

ebsi

te

QU

ALI

TYO

O-H

W.1

5 -T

o im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's im

pact

Shar

e of

wor

kpla

ces

whe

re in

frin

gem

ents

pre

viou

sly

dete

cted

wer

e to

tally

regu

lari

zed

?85

%SL

S re

cord

sO

O-H

W.1

6 -T

o im

prov

e in

spec

tion

proc

edur

e's

qual

itySh

are

of fi

nanc

ial s

anct

ions

pai

d?

50%

SLS

reco

rds

OO

-HW

.17

-To

impr

ove

com

plai

nt's

resp

onse

rate

Shar

e of

hea

lth a

t wor

k fo

rmal

com

plai

nts

trea

ted

?80

%SL

S re

cord

s

56

5.D

isag

greg

atio

n of

Cor

pora

te O

bjec

tive

s pe

r SB

U

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

ratio

nal

Obj

ectiv

es(p

er S

BU)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

Corp

orat

e

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

Labo

ur R

elat

ions

(Cor

pora

teSB

U1)

O

pera

tiona

lObj

ectiv

es

Terr

itor

ial U

nit 1

Labo

ur R

elat

ions

Obj

ectiv

es

Insp

ecto

r 1Pe

rson

alob

ject

ives

Insp

ecto

r nPe

rson

alob

ject

ives

Terr

itor

ial U

nit 24

Labo

ur R

elat

ions

Obj

ectiv

es

Insp

ecto

r 1

Pers

onal

obje

ctiv

es

Insp

ecto

r nPe

rson

alob

ject

ives

Safe

tyat

Wor

k(C

orpo

rate

SBU

2)

Ope

ratio

nalO

bjec

tives

Terr

itor

ial U

nit 1

Safe

tyat

Wor

kO

bjec

tives

Insp

ecto

r 1

Pers

onal

obje

ctiv

e

Insp

ecto

r nPe

rson

alob

ject

ives

Terr

itor

ial U

nit 24

Safe

tyat

Wor

kO

bjec

tives

Insp

ecto

r 1

Pers

onal

obje

ctiv

e

Insp

ecto

r nPe

rson

alob

ject

ives

Hea

lth

atW

ork

(Cor

pora

teSB

U3)

O

pera

tiona

lObj

ectiv

es

Terr

itor

ial U

nit 1

Hea

lthat

Wor

kO

bjec

tives

Insp

ecto

r 1

Pers

onal

obje

ctiv

e

Insp

ecto

r nPe

rson

alob

ject

ives

Terr

itor

ial U

nit 24

Hea

lthat

Wor

kO

bjec

tives

Insp

ecto

r 1

Pers

onal

obje

ctiv

e

Insp

ecto

r nPe

rson

alob

ject

ives

57

5.D

isag

greg

atio

n of

Cor

pora

te O

bjec

tive

s pe

r Te

rrit

oria

l Uni

t1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

ratio

nal

Obj

ectiv

es(p

er S

BU)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

OBJ

ECTI

VE

IND

ICA

TOR

TARG

ETS

TERR

ITO

RIA

L U

NIT

1

TERR

ITO

RIA

L U

NIT

2…

TERR

ITO

RIA

L U

NIT

23

TERR

ITO

RIA

L U

NIT

24TO

TAL

LABO

UR

RELA

TIO

NS

EFFE

CTIV

ENES

SO

O-L

R.01

-To

incr

ease

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of i

nspe

ctio

n vi

sits

on

labo

ur re

latio

ns is

sues EF

FICI

ENCY

OO

-LR.

05 -

To im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's e

ffic

ienc

yN

o. o

f ins

pect

ion

visi

ts o

n la

bour

rela

tions

per

LI QU

ALI

TY

OO

-LR.

09 -

To im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's im

pact

Shar

e of

wor

kpla

ces

whe

re in

frin

gem

ents

pre

viou

sly

dete

cted

wer

e to

tally

regu

lari

zed

SAFE

TY A

T W

ORK

EFFE

CTIV

ENES

SO

O-S

W.0

1 -T

o in

crea

se in

spec

tion

visi

tsN

o. o

f wor

kpla

ces

insp

ecte

d on

saf

ety

at w

ork EF

FICI

ENCY

OO

-SW

.06

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

eff

icie

ncy

No.

of w

orkp

lace

's in

spec

tion

visi

ts o

n sa

fety

at w

ork

per

LIQ

UA

LITY

OO

-SW

.11

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

impa

ctSh

are

of w

orkp

lace

s w

here

infr

inge

men

ts p

revi

ousl

y de

tect

ed w

ere

tota

lly re

gula

rize

dH

EALT

H A

T W

ORK

EFFE

CTIV

ENES

SO

O-H

W.0

1 -T

o in

crea

se in

spec

tion

visi

tsN

o. o

f wor

kpla

ces

insp

ecte

d on

hea

lth a

t wor

k EFFI

CIEN

CYO

O-H

W.0

9 -T

o im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's e

ffic

ienc

yN

o. o

f wor

kpla

ce's

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

on

heal

th a

t wor

k pe

r LI

QU

ALI

TY

OO

-HW

.15

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

impa

ctSh

are

of w

orkp

lace

s w

here

infr

inge

men

ts p

revi

ousl

y de

tect

edw

ere

tota

llyre

gula

rize

d

58

5.D

isag

greg

atio

n of

Cor

pora

te O

bjec

tive

s pe

r La

bour

Insp

ecto

r

1.

Clar

ifyCo

rpor

ate

Mis

sion

& V

isio

n

2.

Focu

s:

Prio

ritie

s(co

nsid

erin

gth

eM

issi

onan

dVi

sion

)

3.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Stra

tegi

cO

bjec

tives

4.

Esta

blis

hCo

rpor

ate

Ope

ratio

nal

Obj

ectiv

es(p

er S

BU)

5.

Dis

aggr

egat

eob

ject

ives

in c

asca

de(f

or lo

wer

SBU

san

dH

R)

OBJ

ECTI

VE

IND

ICA

TOR

TARG

ETS

INSP

ECTO

R 1IN

SPEC

TOR 2

…IN

SPEC

TOR N

-1IN

SPEC

TOR N

TOTA

L LA

BOU

R RE

LATI

ON

SEF

FECT

IVEN

ESS

OO

-LR.

01 -

To in

crea

se in

spec

tion

visi

tsN

o. o

f ins

pect

ion

visi

ts o

n la

bour

rela

tions

issu

esEF

FICI

ENCY

OO

-LR.

05 -

To im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's e

ffic

ienc

yN

o. o

f ins

pect

ion

visi

ts o

n la

bour

rela

tions

per

LI

QU

ALI

TY

OO

-LR.

09 -

To im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's im

pact

Shar

e of

wor

kpla

ces

whe

re in

frin

gem

ents

pre

viou

sly

dete

cted

wer

e to

tally

re

gula

rize

dSA

FETY

AT

WO

RKEF

FECT

IVEN

ESS

OO

-SW

.01

-To

incr

ease

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of w

orkp

lace

s in

spec

ted

on s

afet

y at

wor

kEF

FICI

ENCY

OO

-SW

.06

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

eff

icie

ncy

No.

of w

orkp

lace

's in

spec

tion

visi

ts o

n sa

fety

at w

ork

per

LIQ

UA

LITY

OO

-SW

.11

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

impa

ctSh

are

of w

orkp

lace

s w

here

infr

inge

men

ts p

revi

ousl

y de

tect

ed w

ere

tota

lly

regu

lari

zed

HEA

LTH

AT

WO

RKEF

FECT

IVEN

ESS

OO

-HW

.01

-To

incr

ease

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

No.

of w

orkp

lace

s in

spec

ted

on h

ealth

at w

ork

EFFI

CIEN

CYO

O-H

W.0

9 -T

o im

prov

e in

spec

tion

visi

t's e

ffic

ienc

yN

o. o

f wor

kpla

ce's

insp

ectio

n vi

sits

on

heal

th a

t wor

k pe

r LI

QU

ALI

TY

OO

-HW

.15

-To

impr

ove

insp

ectio

n vi

sit's

impa

ctSh

are

of w

orkp

lace

s w

here

infr

inge

men

ts p

revi

ousl

y de

tect

ed w

ere

tota

lly

regu

lari

zed

TERR

ITO

RIA

L U

NIT

#1

59

Objective Indicator Baseline TargetSource of

verification

SO.01 - To reduce the incidence rate of Fatal Work-related Accidents and Occupational Diseases

Variation rate of the incidence rate of fatal work related accidents 10% -10% SLS data

SO.01 - To reduce the incidence rate of Fatal Work-related Accidents and Occupational Diseases

Variation rate of the incidence rate of confirmed occupational diseases -6% -10% SLS data

SO.02 - To tackle situations of business crisis Variation rate of the amount of wage arrears2018: 12% [(2,645,121,000-

2,368,396,000)/2,368,396,000]-10% SSS data

SO.03 - To reduce UDW Variation rate of the no. of informally employed workers2018: -4% [3541300

(2018)/3695600 (2017)]-10% SSS data

SO.04 - To develop labour inspection staffAverage no. of training hours provided to labour inspectors and support staff

? 35 SLS records

SO.05 - To simplify access to services and complianceTo dematerialize employers' mandatory notifications (e.g., work-related accidents, occupational diseases, transport equipment, explosive material, etc.) through a web-based transactional platform.

by 31/12/2020 SLS records

SO.06 - To improve internal and external image of labour inspection To carry out a internal and external client satisfaction survey by 31/12/2020 SLS records

SO.06 - To improve internal and external image of labour inspectionTo conduct a self-assessment, using the EU Common Assessment Framework (CAF)

by 31/12/2020 SLS records

MISSION: To improve working conditions inUkraine, through the promotion, monitoring and enforcement of labour and OSH regulations

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

Effectiveness

Efficiency

Quality

VISION: To be seen as the most effective, efficient and reliable authority in Ukraine

60


verification

OO-LR.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of inspection visits on labour relations issues 20 442 194 700 SLS data

OO-LR.01 - To increase inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of inspection visits on labour relations issues 852% SLS data

OO-LR.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of employers inspected 19 997 199 033 SLS dataOO-LR.01 - To increase inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of employers inspected 895% SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of inspection visits on UDW 64% 40% SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of inspection visits on UDW 13 060 77 880 SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of inspection visits on UDW 496% SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of employers inspected on UDW 12 641 80 461 SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of employers inspected on UDW 537% SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of inspection visits on wage arrears 6% 20% SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of inspection visits on wage arrears 1 200 38 940 SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of inspection visits on wage arrears 3145% SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of inspection visits on minimum wage 37% 20% SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of inspection visits on minimum wage 7 620 38 940 SLS dataOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of inspection visits on minimum wage 411% SLS dataOO-LR.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of employers provided with technical advice on labour relation issues ? 124 608 SLS dataOO-LR.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of workers provided with technical advice on labour relation issues ? 124 608 SLS data

OO-LR.04 - To improve legal framework on labour relationsDraft and submit to the concern Ministry a draft law establishing the statute of labour inspection (recruitment & selection, training, career, functions, powers and procedures) aligned with ILO C81 and C129.

? by the end of 2020 SLS records

OO-LR.04 - To improve legal framework on labour relations

Draft and submit to the concern Ministry a draft law incorporating into national legislation the provisions of ILO R198 establishing a legal presumption of the existence of an employment relationiship whenever serveral indicators of juridical subordination are present.


OO-LR.04 - To improve legal framework on labour relations

Draft and submit to the concern Ministry the legal acts aimed at transposing the following EU Directives: 91/533/EEC, 1999/70/EC, 97/81/EC, 98/59/EC, 2001/23/EC, 2002/14/EC, 2000/43/EC, 2000/78/EC, 96/34/EC, 79/7/EEC and 2006/54/EC.


OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of inspection visits on labour relations per LI 29(2018)/15(2019) 300 SLS records

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Variation rate on the no. of inspection visits on labour relations per LI 934% SLS records

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of inspection visits on UDW per LI 11(2018)/5(2019) 120 SLS records

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Variation rate on the average no. of inspection visits on UDW per LI 991% SLS records

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of UDW detected per inspection visit 1,9 6 SLS records

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Variation rate on the average no. of UDW detected per inspection visit 211% SLS records

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of inspection visits on wage arrears per LI 1.7(2018)/.75(2019) 60 SLS records

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyVariation rate on the average no. of inspection visits on wage arrears per LI

3429% SLS records

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of inspection visits on minimum wage per LI 10.7(2018)/5.11(2019) 60 SLS records

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyVariation rate on the average no. of inspection visits on minimum wage per LI

461% SLS records

OO-LR.06 - To target inspection visitsShare of inspection visits on UDW more prone sectors (construction, agriculture, temporary accommodation and catering services and wholesale and retail trade).

? 75% SLS records

OO-LR.06 - To target inspection visitsNo. of inspection visits on UDW more prone sectors (construction, agriculture, temporary accommodation and catering services and wholesale and retail trade).

? 58 410 SLS records

OO-LR.07 - To simplify the FAQ's information section of Webpage Classify and disaggregate FAQs by themes and sub-themes by 31/12/2020 SLS WebpageOO-LR.08 - To reduce the average time to draft and submit legal acts for approval

Average time for drafting and submitting a legal act ? 1 month SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of workplaces where infringements previously detected were totally regularized

? 85% SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were totally regularized

? 85% SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of workplaces where infringements previously detected were partially regularized

? 10% SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were partially regularized

? 10% SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of workplaces where infringements previously detected were not regularized

? 5% SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were not regularized

? 5% SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of follow-up vists where infringements previously detected were totally regularized

? 85% SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of follow-up vists where infringements previously detected were partially regularized

? 10% SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of follow-up vists where infringements previously detected were not regularized

? 5% SLS records

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impact Share of detected UDW regularized ? 100% SLS recordsOO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impact Share of detected wage arreas paied to workers 12% 25% SLS recordsOO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impact Share of minimum wage detected violations regularized ? 100% SLS recordsOO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of notifications complied with 73% 85% SLS records

OO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions paid2019: 9674 fines; 3% paid(46605000/1650000000)

50% SLS records

OO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealed against ? 15% SLS records

OO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealled against to but confirmed by courts ? 80% SLS records

OO-LR.11 - To improve complaint's response rate Share of labour relation's formal complaints treated ? 80% SLS records

OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES

LABOUR RELATIONS

Effectiveness

Efficiency

Quality

61


verification

OO-SW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of workplaces inspected on safety at work 45 495 219 600 SLS dataOO-SW.01 - To increase inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of inspection visits on safety issues 383% SLS dataOO-SW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of employers inspected on safety at work 20 593 99 400 SLS dataOO-SW.01 - To increase inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of employers inspected on safety at work 383% SLS dataOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits to high-risk facilities workplaces ? 15% SLS dataOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits to high-risk facilities workplaces ? 32 940 SLS dataOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on construction sites ? 15% SLS dataOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on construction sites ? 32 940 SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on mining and quarrying sector workplaces ? 15% SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on mining and quarrying sector workplaces ? 32 940 SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of safety inspection visits on agriculture, forestry and fishing sector workplaces

? 15% SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of safety inspection visits on agriculture, forestry and fishing sector workplaces

? 32 940 SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of safety inspection visits on transportation and storage sector workplaces

? 15% SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of safety inspection visits on transportation and storage sector workplaces

? 32 940 SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on occupational risk assessment ? 30% SLS dataOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on occupational risk assessment ? 65 880 SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits OSH services organization and means ? 15% SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on OSH services organization and means ? 32 940 SLS data

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on the use of work equipment ? 15% SLS dataOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on the use of work equipment ? 32 940 SLS dataOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on the use of chemical agents ? 15% SLS dataOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on the use of chemical agents ? 32 940 SLS dataOO-SW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of employers provided with technical advice on safety at work ? 140 544 SLS dataOO-SW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of workers provided with technical advice on safety at work ? 140 544 SLS data

OO-SW.04 - To improve legal framework on OSH

Draft and submit to the concern Ministry the legal acts (with the adecquate legal power) aimed at transposing the following EU Directives (or updating it): 89/391/EEC, 89/654/EEC, 2009/104/EC, 92/91/EEC, 92/104/EEC, 89/656/EEC, 2003/88/EC, 92/57/EEC, 92/58/EEC, 1999/92/EC, 91/383/EEC, 92/85/EEC.


OO-SW.05 - To increase no. of investigated work accidents No. of fatal and non-fatal work-related accidents inquiries conducted 4,126(2018)/1,943(2019) 8 052 SLS records

OO-SW.05 - To increase no. of investigated work accidents Variation rate on the no. of investigated work-related accidents 95% SLS records

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of workplace's inspection visits on safety at work per LI 63(2018)/35(2019) 300 SLS records

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Variation rate on the no. of workplace's safety inspection visits per LI 376% SLS records

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of employers inspected on safety at work per LI 29(2018)/16(2019) 136 SLS records

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Variation rate on the no. of employer's safety inspection visits per LI 368% SLS records

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of safety inspection visits to high-risk facilities workplaces per LI

45 SLS records

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of safety inspection visits on occupational risk assessment per LI

90 SLS records

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of safety inspection visits on OSH services organization and means per LI

45 SLS records

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of safety inspection visits on the use of work equipment per LI 45 SLS records

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of safety inspection visits on the use of chemical agents per LI 45 SLS records

OO-SW.07 - To target inspection visits Average no. of safety inspection visits to construction sites per LI 45 SLS records

OO-SW.07 - To target inspection visitsAverage no. of safety inspection visits to mining and quarrying sector workplaces per LI

45 SLS records

OO-SW.07 - To target inspection visitsAverage no. of safety inspection visits to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector workplaces per LI

45 SLS records

OO-SW.07 - To target inspection visitsAverage no. of safety inspection visits to transportation and storage sector workplaces per LI

45 SLS records

OO-SW.08 - To improve work accident's investigation efficiency

Average no. of work accidents investigated per LI 5.7 (2018)/2.7(2019) 11 SLS records

OO-SW.09 - To reduce the average time to draft and submit legal acts for approval


OO-SW.10 - To simplify and facilitate complianceNo. of EU-OSHA "Online Interactive Risk Assessment" (OiRA)Tools translated into Ukrainian

na 4 SLS Website

OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of workplaces where infringements previously detected were totally regularized

81% 85% SLS records

OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were totally regularized

81% 85% SLS records

OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of workplaces where infringements previously detected were partially regularized

? 10% SLS records

OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare employers where infringements previously detected were partially regularized

? 10% SLS records

OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of workplaces where infringements previously detected were not regularized

? 5% SLS records

OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare ofemployers where infringements previously detected were not regularized

? 5% SLS records

OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of follow-up vists where infringements previously detected were totally regularized

? 85% SLS records

OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of follow-up vists where infringements previously detected were partially regularized

? 10% SLS records

OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of follow-up vists where infringements previously detected were not regularized

? 5% SLS records

OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of notifications complied with ? 85% SLS records

OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions paid ? 85% SLS records


SAFETY AT WORK (LABOUR PROTECTION)

Effectiveness

Efficiency

Quality

62


verification


SAFETY AT WORK (LABOUR PROTECTION)

OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealed against ? 15% SLS records

OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealled against to but confirmed by courts ? 80% SLS records

OO-SW.13 - To improve complaint's response rate Share of safety at work formal complaints treated ? 80% SLS records

63


verification

OO-HW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of workplaces inspected on health at work 2500(2018)/1734(2019) 22 272 SLS data

OO-HW.01 - To increase inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of inspection visits on health at work 791% SLS data

OO-HW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of employers inspected on health at work ? 10 081 SLS dataOO-HW.01 - To increase inspection visits Variation rate of the no. of employers inspected on health at SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of health inspection visits to harmful and arduous conditions workplaces

? 25% SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of health inspection visits to harmful and arduous conditions workplaces

? 5 568 SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of health inspection visits to mining and quarrying sector workplaces

? 25% SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of health inspection visits to mining and quarrying sector workplaces

? 5 568 SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of health inspection visits to metallurgical production sector workplaces

? 15% SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of health inspection visits to metallurgical production sector workplaces

? 3 341 SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of health inspection visits to production of machinery and equipment sector workplaces

? 10% SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of health inspection visits to production of machinery and equipment sector workplaces

? 2 227 SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits to health care sector workplaces ? 10% SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits to health care sector workplaces ? 2 227 SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on air quality ? 25% SLS dataOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on air quality ? 5 568 SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on the use of chemical agents ? 25% SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on the use of chemical agents ? 5 568 SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of health inspection visits on Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) risk factors

? 15% SLS data

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on MSD risk factors ? 3 341 SLS dataOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on noise risk factors ? 15% SLS dataOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on noise risk factors ? 3 341 SLS dataOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on vibration risk factors ? 10% SLS dataOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on vibration risk factors ? 2 227 SLS dataOO-HW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of employers provided with technical advice on health at 2018: 3,578 (employ+work) 22 272 SLS dataOO-HW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of workers provided with technical advice on health at work 2018: 3,578 (employ+work) 22 272 SLS data




OO-HW.05 - To increase no. of investigated occupational diseasesShare of requested occupational diseases (OD) inquiries conducted

2018: 91.1% (2,265/2,484); 2019: 91.5% (1,273/1,391)

95% SLS records

OO-HW.06 - To increase coverage of information and awareness-raising activities on OD prevention

No. of workers covered 264 520 300 000 SLS records


No. of employers representatives covered 264 520 300 000 SLS records

OO-HW.07 - To increase no. of certified laboratories for hygienic studies

No. of employers certified 2018: 79/2019: 80 300 SLS records

OO-HW.08 - To increase no. of Worker Category Statements (for No. of issued statements 2018:15,030/2019:8,421 33 408 SLS records


HEALTH AT WORK (LABOUR HYGIENE)

Effectiveness

64


verification


HEALTH AT WORK (LABOUR HYGIENE)

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of workplace's inspection visits on health at work per LI 23(2018)/15(2019) 192 SLS recordsOO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Variation rate on the no. of workplace's safety inspection visits ? 735% SLS recordsOO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of employers inspected on health at work per LI ? 87 SLS recordsOO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Variation rate on the no. of employer's safety inspection visits ? SLS records

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of health inspection visits to harmful and arduous conditions workplaces per LI

? 48 SLS records

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on air quality per LI ? 48 SLS records

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of health inspection visits on the use of chemical agentss per LI

? 48 SLS records

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on MSD risk factors per LI ? 29 SLS records

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on noise risk factors per LI ? 29 SLS records

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on vibration risk factors ? 19 SLS records

OO-HW.10 - To target inspection visitsAverage no. of health inspection visits to mining and quarrying sector workplaces per LI

? 48 SLS records

OO-HW.10 - To target inspection visitsAverage no. of health inspection visits to metallurgical production sector workplaces per LI

? 29 SLS records

OO-HW.10 - To target inspection visitsAverage no. of health inspection visits to production of machinery and equipment sector workplaces per LI

? 19 SLS records

OO-HW.10 - To target inspection visitsAverage no. of health inspection visits to health care sector workplaces per LI

? 19 SLS records

OO-HW.11 - To improve OD's investigation efficiency Average no. of ODs investigated per LI 20 (2018)/11(2019) 22 SLS records

OO-HW.12 - To improve worker category statements efficiency Average no. of statements issue by LI 2018:135/2019:73 288 SLS records

OO-HW.13 - To reduce the average time to draft and submit legal acts for approval


OO-HW.14 - To simplify and facilitate complianceNo. of EU-OSHA "Online Interactive Risk Assessment" (OiRA)Tools translated into Ukrainian

na 4 SLS Website

OO-HW.15 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of workplaces where infringements previously detected were totally regularized

? 85% SLS records

OO-HW.15 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were totally regularized

? 85% SLS records

OO-HW.15 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of workplaces where infringements previously detected were partially regularized

? 10% SLS records

OO-HW.15 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were partially regularized

? 10% SLS records

OO-HW.15 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of workplaces where infringements previously detected were not regularized

? 5% SLS records

OO-HW.15 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were not regularized

? 5% SLS records

OO-HW.15 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of follow-up vists where infringements previously detected were totally regularized

? 85% SLS records

OO-HW.15 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of follow-up vists where infringements previously detected were partially regularized

? 10% SLS records

OO-HW.15 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of follow-up vists where infringements previously detected were not regularized

? 5% SLS records

OO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of notifications complied with ? 85% SLS recordsOO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions paid ? 50% SLS recordsOO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealed against ? 15% SLS records

OO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's qualityShare of financial sanctions appealled against to but confirmed by courts

? 80% SLS records

OO-HW.17 - To improve complaint's response rate Share of health at work formal complaints treated ? 80% SLS records

Efficiency

Quality

65

Territorial Unit1 Territorial Unit2 … Territorial Unit23 Territorial Unit24 Total

OO-LR.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of inspection visits on labour relations issuesOO-LR.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of employers inspected on labour relations issuesOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of inspection visits on UDWOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of inspection visits on UDWOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of employers inspected on UDWOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of inspection visits on wage arrearsOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of inspection visits on wage arrearsOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of inspection visits on minimum wageOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of inspection visits on minimum wage

OO-LR.03 - To increase technical advice providedNo. of employers provided with technical advice on labour relation issues

OO-LR.03 - To increase technical advice providedNo. of workers provided with technical advice on labour relation issues

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of inspection visits on labour relations per LIOO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of inspection visits on UDW per LIOO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of UDW detected per inspection visitOO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of inspection visits on wage arrears per LI

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of inspection visits on minimum wage per LI












OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impact Share of detected UDW regularizedOO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impact Share of detected wage arreas paied to workers

OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impact Share of minimum wage detected violations regularized

OO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of notifications complied withOO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions paidOO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealed against

OO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's qualityShare of financial sanctions appealled against to but confirmed by courts

OO-LR.11 - To improve complaint's response rate Share of labour relation's formal complaints treated


TERRITORIAL UNITS

Effectiveness

Efficiency

Quality

LABOUR RELATIONS

TargetsIndicatorObjective

66



TERRITORIAL UNITS


OO-SW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of workplaces inspected on safety at workOO-SW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of employers inspected on safety at work

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits to high-risk facilities workplaces

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits to high-risk facilities workplaces

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on construction sitesOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on construction sites

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of safety inspection visits on mining and quarrying sector workplaces

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of safety inspection visits on mining and quarrying sector workplaces





OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on occupational risk assessment

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on occupational risk assessment

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of safety inspection visits OSH services organization and means

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of safety inspection visits on OSH services organization and means

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on the use of work equipment

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on the use of work equipment

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on the use of chemical agents

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on the use of chemical agents

OO-SW.03 - To increase technical advice providedNo. of employers provided with technical advice on safety at work

OO-SW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of workers provided with technical advice on safety at work

OO-SW.05 - To increase no. of investigated work accidentsNo. of fatal and non-fatal work-related accidents inquiries conducted

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of workplace's inspection visits on safety at work per LI

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of employers inspected on safety at work per LI




OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of safety inspection visits on the use of work equipment per LI

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of safety inspection visits on the use of chemical agents per LI

OO-SW.07 - To target inspection visitsAverage no. of safety inspection visits to construction sites per LI





Average no. of work accidents investigated per LI




OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were partially regularized


OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were not regularized




OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of notifications complied with

OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions paid

OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealed against

OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's qualityShare of financial sanctions appealled against to but confirmed by courts

OO-SW.13 - To improve complaint's response rate Share of safety at work formal complaints treated

SAFETY AT WORKEffectiveness

Efficiency

Quality

67



TERRITORIAL UNITS


OO-HW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of workplaces inspected on health at workOO-HW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of employers inspected on health at work









OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of health inspection visits to health care sector workplaces

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits to health care sector workplaces

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on air qualityOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on air quality

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on the use of chemical agents

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on the use of chemical agents


OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on MSD risk factorsOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on noise risk factorsOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on noise risk factorsOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on vibration risk factorsOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on vibration risk factors

OO-HW.03 - To increase technical advice providedNo. of employers provided with technical advice on health at work

OO-HW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of workers provided with technical advice on health at work



OO-HW.05 - To increase no. of investigated occupational diseases

Share of requested occupational diseases (OD) inquiries conducted


No. of workers covered


No. of employers representatives covered


No. of employers certified

OO-HW.08 - To increase no. of Worker Category Statements No. of issued statements

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of workplace's inspection visits on health at work per LIOO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Variation rate on the no. of workplace's safety inspection visits OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of employers inspected on health at work per LIOO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Variation rate on the no. of employer's safety inspection visits


OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on air quality per LI


OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of health inspection visits on MSD risk factors per LI

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of health inspection visits on noise risk factors per LI

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on vibration risk factors





OO-HW.11 - To improve OD's investigation efficiency Average no. of ODs investigated per LIOO-HW.12 - To improve worker category statements efficiency

Average no. of statements issue by LI


Average time for drafting and submitting a legal act











OO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of notifications complied with

OO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions paid

OO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealed against


OO-HW.17 - To improve complaint's response rate Share of health at work formal complaints treated

HEALTH AT WORKEffectiveness

Efficiency

Quality

68

69

Inspector1 Inspector2 … Inspectorn-1 Inspectorn Total

OO-LR.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of inspection visits on labour relations issuesOO-LR.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of employers inspected on labour relations issuesOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of inspection visits on UDWOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of inspection visits on UDWOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of employers inspected on UDWOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of inspection visits on wage arrearsOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of inspection visits on wage arrearsOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of inspection visits on minimum wageOO-LR.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of inspection visits on minimum wage

OO-LR.03 - To increase technical advice providedNo. of employers provided with technical advice on labour relation issues

OO-LR.03 - To increase technical advice providedNo. of workers provided with technical advice on labour relation issues

OO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of inspection visits on labour relations per LIOO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of inspection visits on UDW per LIOO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of UDW detected per inspection visitOO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of inspection visits on wage arrears per LIOO-LR.05 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of inspection visits on minimum wage per LI












OO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impact Share of detected UDW regularizedOO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impact Share of detected wage arreas paied to workersOO-LR.09 - To improve inspection visit's impact Share of minimum wage detected violations regularizedOO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of notifications complied withOO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions paidOO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealed against

OO-LR.10 - To improve inspection procedure's qualityShare of financial sanctions appealled against to but confirmed by courts

OO-LR.11 - To improve complaint's response rate Share of labour relation's formal complaints treated

LABOUR RELATIONS

Objective Indicator

Targets

OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVESTERRITORIAL UNIT #1

Effectiveness

Efficiency

Quality

70

Inspector1 Inspector2 … Inspectorn-1 Inspectorn Total Objective Indicator

Targets


OO-SW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of workplaces inspected on safety at workOO-SW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of employers inspected on safety at work

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits to high-risk facilities workplaces

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits to high-risk facilities workplaces

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on construction sitesOO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on construction sites

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of safety inspection visits on mining and quarrying sector workplaces

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of safety inspection visits on mining and quarrying sector workplaces





OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on occupational risk assessment

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on occupational risk assessment

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsShare of safety inspection visits OSH services organization and means

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visitsNo. of safety inspection visits on OSH services organization and means

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on the use of work equipment

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on the use of work equipment

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of safety inspection visits on the use of chemical agents

OO-SW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of safety inspection visits on the use of chemical agentsOO-SW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of employers provided with technical advice on safety at workOO-SW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of workers provided with technical advice on safety at work

OO-SW.05 - To increase no. of investigated work accidentsNo. of fatal and non-fatal work-related accidents inquiries conducted

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of workplace's inspection visits on safety at work per LIOO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of employers inspected on safety at work per LI




OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of safety inspection visits on the use of work equipment per LI

OO-SW.06 - To improve inspection visit's efficiencyAverage no. of safety inspection visits on the use of chemical agents per LI

OO-SW.07 - To target inspection visits Average no. of safety inspection visits to construction sites per LI





Average no. of work accidents investigated per LI




OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were partially regularized


OO-SW.11 - To improve inspection visit's impactShare of employers where infringements previously detected were not regularized




OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of notifications complied withOO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions paidOO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealed against

OO-SW.12 - To improve inspection procedure's qualityShare of financial sanctions appealled against to but confirmed by courts

OO-SW.13 - To improve complaint's response rate Share of safety at work formal complaints treated

SAFETY AT WORKEffectiveness

Quality

Efficiency

71


Targets


OO-HW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of workplaces inspected on health at workOO-HW.01 - To increase inspection visits No. of employers inspected on health at work









OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits to health care sector workplaces

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits to health care sector workplaces

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on air qualityOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on air quality

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on the use of chemical agents

OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on the use of chemical agents


OO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on MSD risk factorsOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on noise risk factorsOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on noise risk factorsOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits Share of health inspection visits on vibration risk factorsOO-HW.02 -To focus inspection visits No. of health inspection visits on vibration risk factors

OO-HW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of employers provided with technical advice on health at work

OO-HW.03 - To increase technical advice provided No. of workers provided with technical advice on health at work



OO-HW.05 - To increase no. of investigated occupational diseases

Share of requested occupational diseases (OD) inquiries conducted


No. of workers covered


No. of employers representatives covered


No. of employers certified

OO-HW.08 - To increase no. of Worker Category Statements No. of issued statements

HEALTH AT WORKEffectiveness

72


Targets


OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of workplace's inspection visits on health at work per LIOO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency No. of employers inspected on health at work per LI


OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on air quality per LI


OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on MSD risk factors per LI

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on noise risk factors per LI

OO-HW.09 - To improve inspection visit's efficiency Average no. of health inspection visits on vibration risk factors per





OO-HW.11 - To improve OD's investigation efficiency Average no. of ODs investigated per LIOO-HW.12 - To improve worker category statements efficiency

Average no. of statements issue by LI


Average time for drafting and submitting a legal act











OO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of notifications complied withOO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions paidOO-HW.16 - To improve inspection procedure's quality Share of financial sanctions appealed against


OO-HW.17 - To improve complaint's response rate Share of health at work formal complaints treated

Quality

Efficiency

73

Documents

State Labour Service Inspection Activity Strategic Plan