THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS

APPLIED BY THE LECTURERS IN TEACHING READING SUBJECT AT THE

ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF STAIN

PALANGKA RAYA

THESIS

Presented to the Department of Education of the State Islamic College of Palangka Raya

in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan Islam

By

TAUFIK HIDAYAT

SRN: 0901120498

STATE ISLAMIC COLLEGE OF PALANGKA RAYA

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION

1435 H / 2014 M

THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD APPLIED

BY THE LECTURERS IN TEACHING READING SUBJECT AT THE ENGLISH

EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF STAIN PALANGKA RAYA

APPROVAL OF THE THESIS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Title of the thesis : THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE

INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD APPLIED BY THE LECTURERS

IN TEACHING READING SUBJECT AT THE ENGLISH

EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF STAIN PALANGKA

RAYA

Name : Taufik Hidayat

SRN : 0901120498

Department : Education

Study Program : English Program

Level : S-1

Palangka Raya, 7 Agustus 2014

Approved by:

Advisor I,

Hj. Apni Ranti, S.Pd, M.Hum

ORN. 19810118 2008012013

Advisor II,

Nahdhiyah, S.S, M.Pd.

ORN.19810127 20090l2006

Vice Chairman of Academic and

Institution Development

Drs. Fahmi, M.Pd.

ORN. 19610520 199903 1 003

The Chair of Department

of Education

Triwid S. N. S.Ag, M.Pd.

ORN.197109142003122001

LEGALIZATION OF THESIS EXAMINING COMMITTEE

This thesis entitled THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE INSTRUCTIONAL

METHOD APPLIED BY THE LECTURERS IN TEACHING READING SUBJECT

AT THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF STAIN PALANGKA

RAYA in the name of TAUFIK HIDAYAT, and his student registration number is

0901120498. It has been examined in the board of examiners of the State Islamic College of

Palangka Raya on:

Day : Thursday

Date : September 11th

, 2014

Palangka Raya, September 11th

, 2014

Board of Examiners:

1. Siminto, S.Pd, M.Hum. (…………………………………..)

Chairman/Member

2. Dra. Halimah, M.Pd. (…………………………………..)

Member

3. Hj. Apni Ranti, M.Hum. (…………………………………..)

Member

4. Nahdhiyah, S.S, M.Pd. (…………………………………..)

Secretary/ Member

The State Islamic College of Palangka

Raya Director,

Dr. Ibnu Elmi A.S. Pelu, S.H., M.H.

ORN. 19750109199903 1 002

NOTA DINAS

Palangka Raya, 7 Agustus 2014

Hal : Mohon Diuji Skripsi

Saudara Taufik Hidayat

Kepada

Yth. Ketua Panitia Ujian Skripsi

STAIN Palangka Raya

In

Palangka Raya

Assalammu’alaikum Wr. Wb.

Setelah membaca, memeriksa dan mengadakan perbaikan seperlunya, kami

berpendapat bahwa skripsi saudara:

Nama : Taufik Hidayat

Nomor Induk Mahasiswa : 0901120498

Judul Skripsi :THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE

INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD APPLIED BY THE

LECTURERS IN TEACHING READING SUBJECT

AT THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY

PROGRAM OF STAIN PALANGKA RAYA

Sudah dapat diujikan untuk memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Pendidikan Islam.

Demikian atas perhatiannya diucapkan terima kasih.

Wassalammu’alaikum Wr. Wb.

Pembimbing I,

Hj. APNI RANTI, S.Pd, M.Hum

NIP. 198101182008012013

Pembimbing II,

NAHDHIYAH, S.S, M.Pd.

NIP.198101272009012006

OFFICIAL NOTE

Palangka Raya, 7 Agustus 2014

Case : Examination of

Taufik Hidayat’s Thesis

To Director of the State Islamic College of

Palangka Raya

In

Palangka Raya

Assalammu’alaikumWr. Wb.

By reading and analyzing this thesis, we think the thesis in the name of:

Name : Taufik Hidayat

Students Registration Number : 0901120498

Title of the thesis : THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE

INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD APPLIED BY THE

LECTURERS IN TEACHING READING SUBJECT AT

THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF

STAIN PALANGKA RAYA

Can be examined in partial fulfillment of the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan Islam in

English Education of the Department of Education STAIN Palangka Raya.

Thank you for the attention.

Wassalammu’alaikum Wr. Wb.

Advisor I,

Hj. APNI RANTI, S.Pd, M.Hum.

ORN.198101182008012013

Advisor II,

NAHDHIYAH, S.S, M.Pd.

ORN.198101272009012006

PERSETUJUAN SKRIPSI

Judul Skripsi : THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE INSTRUCTIONAL

METHOD APPLIED BY THE LECTURERS IN TEACHING

READING SUBJECT AT THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY

PROGRAM OF STAIN PALANGKA RAYA

Nama : Taufik Hidayat

NIM : 0901120498

Jurusan : Tarbiyah

Program Studi : Tadris Bahasa Inggris (TBI)

Jenjang : S-1

Palangka Raya, 7 Agustus 2014

Menyetujui:

Pembimbing I,

Hj.Apni Ranti, S.Pd, M.Hum

NIP. 19810118200801 2 013

Pembimbing II,

Nahdhiyah, S.S M.Pd.

NIP.19810127 200901 2 006

Mengetahui:

Wakil Ketua Bidang Akademik

Dan PengembanganInstitusi

Drs. Fahmi, M.Pd.

NIP. 19610520 199903 1 003

Ketua JurusanTarbiyah

Triwid S. N.,S.Ag.,M.Pd.

NIP.197109142003122001

ABSTRACT

This research is aimed to measure the the students’ perceptions on the instructional

method applied by the lecturers in teaching reading subject at the English education study

program of STAIN Palangka Raya

The type of study was case study, the writer used qualitative approach. Data

collections used were observation, interview, and documentation. There were four classes A,

B, C, and D in reading III subject, and 20 students were as respondent who were interviewed,

this research used purposive sampling.

The result of the study shown that: the students’ perceptions on the instructional

method applied by the lecturers in teaching reading subject at the English education study

program of STAIN Palangka Raya, could be divided into three categories; satisfied, less

satisfied, unsatisfied. The satisfied methods that used by the lecturers in teaching reading III

subject at TBI STAIN Palangka Raya were direct method and cooperative learning. Less

satisfied methods that used by the lecturers in teaching reading III subject at TBI STAIN

Palangka Raya were lecturing, and brainstorming. Unsatisfied methods that used by the

lecturers in teaching reading III subject at TBI STAIN Palangka Raya were grammar

translation method, and tasking.

Key words: Perception, Instructional method, Reading

ABSTRAK

PERSEPSI MAHASISWA TERHADAP METODE INSTRUKSIONAL YANG

DITERAPKAN OLEH DOSEN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN READING DI TADRIS

BAHASA INGGRIS STAIN PALANGKA RAYA.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur persepsi mahasiswa terhadap metode

pembelajaran yang diterapkan oleh dosen reading dalam pembelajaran mata kuliah reading

di program studi pendidikan bahasa Inggris STAIN Palangka Raya.

Penelitian ini menggunakan studi kasus. Penulis menggunakan pendekatan Kualitatif.

Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Ada empat

kelas reading A, B, C and D, dan 20 orang yang menjadi responden untuk diwawancarai.

Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik purposive sampling (sampel bertujuan).

Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa: persepsi mahasiswa terhadap metode

instruksional yang diterapkan oleh dosen reading di tadris bahasa inggris STAIN Palangka

Raya, terbagi dalam tiga kategori, Puas, Kurang puas, dan tidak puas. Metode yang puas

digunakan dosen dalam pembelajaran reding III di tadris bahasa inggris STAIN Palangka

Raya, adalah direct method dan cooperative learning. Metode yang kurang puas digunakan

dosen dalam pembelajaran reding III di tadris bahasa inggris STAIN Palangka Raya, adalah

ceramah, dan brainstorming. Metode yang tidak puas digunakan dosen dalam pembelajaran

reding III di tadris bahasa inggris STAIN Palangka Raya, adalah grammar translation method

dan penugasan.

Kata kunci: Persepsi, Metode instruksional, Reading.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The writer likes to show the best gratitude to our almighty, Allah who has given him

a drop of knowledge with a million powers and patience. Peace and salutation be upon to

greatest reformer in Islam, he is Muhammad SAW. Through his end less mediation that the

writer recognized as a true exist Moslem. Because of that divine gift of grace from Allah, the

writer finally able to finish this thesis entitled THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON

THE INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD APPLIED BY THE LECTURERS IN

TEACHING READING SUBJECT AT THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY

PROGRAM OF STAIN PALANGKA RAYA as the requirement for the degree of S1 in

English program of STAIN Palangka Raya. In addition, a long in process of finishing this

thesis the writer would like to dedicate best thank to:

1. Dr. Ibnu Elmi AS Pelu, SH, MH, The Director of the State Islamic College of

Palangka Raya (STAIN), for his direction and encouragement.

2. Triwid S.N, M.Pd, The Chair of Department of Education, for her agreement so that

the writer can complete the requirements of writing this thesis.

3. Santi Erliana, M.Pd.,The chief of the English Education Study Program, for her

guidance and encouragement during the accomplishment of this thesis.

4. Hj. Apni Ranti, M.Hum, The first advisor, for her valuable guidance, suggestion, and

encouragement.

5. Nahdiyah, M.Pd., The second advisor, for her valuable guidance, suggestion, and

encouragement.

6. All English lecturers of STAIN of Palangka Raya.

Furthermore, the writer also expresses thanks for beloved parents, sisters and

brothers and all family who always support, pray suggest, accomplish this study. The last

special thanks to friends of TBI 2009 for their support.

The writer realized that the study is still far from the perfect, therefore some

constructive critic and suggestions are welcomed. Finally, may Allah always bless us.

DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICCATION

In the name of Allah

I my self make declaration that this thesisis entitled THE STUDENTS’

PERCEPTIONS ON THE INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD APPLIED BY THE

LECTURERS IN TEACHING READING SUBJECT AT THE ENGLISH

EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF STAIN PALANGKA RAYA is truly my own

writing. If it is not my own writing, it is given acitation and shown in the list of

references.

If my own declaration is not right in this thesis one day so, I am ready to be given

academics anction namely, the cancellation of the degree of this thesis.

Palangka Raya, 26 May 2014

My own Declaration

Taufik Hidayat

SRN.0901120498

DEDICATION

This thesis dedicated for:

My Beloved father Raino, and my beloved mother Saniah.

Thanks for being my best parent. Thanks for your love, your time, and everything that you

have given to me.

My beloved Brother and Sister Hadi Susanto, S.E, and Ida Rosidah, S.Pd.

Thanks for the time that we have spent together.

Special Thanks to,

Eri Nur Familia, who gives me spirit and support Never end.

My Rita’s Group a.k.a Jamil Januansyah, Nursalilis, Andrean, Abdullah, Della Novianti Ridha,

Deby Irawan, Sehab Ependi, Wahyu Suryadi, and Taraneka R

Thanks for being my “crazy” friends. Thanks for the time that we have spent together.

My Islamic Association of University students (HMI), thanks for everything. All

of my friends (kader-kader) HMI komisariat STAIN Palangka Raya, who always

give support and

praying for me, YAKUSA !!

All of My Friends in TBI’09. Thanks for everything.

TAUFIK HIDAYAT Taufik Hidayat is the third child of Raino and Saniah. He was born on December 24

th 1990 at

Cirebon-West Java, Indonesia.

Education:

o SDN 1 Karang Asem, Plumbon-Cirebon 1998-2003

o SMPN 2 Plumbon-Cirebon 2003-2006

o SMAN 1 Jamblang-Cirebon 2006-2009

o STAIN Palangka Raya-Kalteng 2009-2014

Training:

o Basic Training 1 Islamic Association of University Students (HmI) 2010

o Intermediate Training 2 Islamic Association of University Students (HmI) 2011

o Leadership Training se-Palangka Raya 2010

o Finalis Duta Lalulintas Kota Palangka Raya 2011

o For institute ecosoc rights (membaca dan menganalisa anggaran/APBD dengan

perspektif hak Ekosob) 2012

o Community Organizing (CO) PKBI 2012

o Road show Indonesia Mengajar 2012

o Tour and guide 2013

o Youth forum meeting and shearing PKBI 2013

o Leadership by KEMENPORA Tingkat Madya Angkatan IV. 2014

o Asean Unity (grand launching, workshop) 2014

Intra Organization:

o HMJ Tarbiyah 2011-2012

o KPUM 2012

Extra Organization:

o HmI 2010- s/d Now

Non Government Organization (NGO):

o The Indonesian Planned Parenthood Association (PKBI)

Working Experience:

Community Organizing (CO) PNPM-Peduli, PKBI Kalteng. (2012-Now)

Motto

YAKIN USAHA SAMPAI

(YAKUSA) HmI-

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

COVER PAGE ............................................................................................... i

APPROVAL OF THE THESIS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ................... ii

OFFICIAL NOTE .......................................................................................... iii

LEGALIZATION OF THESIS EXAMINING COMMITTEE ................ iv

DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICCATION ............................................ v

ABSTRACT .................................................................................................... vi

ABSTRAK ...................................................................................................... vii

MOTTO .......................................................................................................... viii

DEDICATION................................................................................................ ix

..........................................................................................................................

ACKNOWLEDMENTS ................................................................................ x

TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................. xi

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A. Background of the Study ................................................ 1

B. Problem of the Study ...................................................... 4

C. Objective of the Study .................................................... 4

D. Significance of the Study ................................................ 4

E. Scope and Limitation ...................................................... 5

F. Definition of Key Terms ................................................. 6

G. Framework of Disscussion .............................................. 7

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

A. Related Studies ............................................................... 8

B. Concept of Instructional Method .................................... 11

C. The Instructional Method in Teaching Reading ............. 22

D. Concept of perception ..................................................... 26

E. Freme of Thinking .......................................................... 28

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

A. Research Design ............................................................ 30

B. Time And Place Of The Study ........................................ 32

C. Subject And Object of The Study ................................... 32

D. Data Collecting Procedure .............................................. 33

E. Data Endorsment ............................................................. 35

F. Data Analysis Procedure ................................................ 37

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION

A. Result of the study .......................................................... 41

B. Discussion ....................................................................... 66

CHAPTER V CLOSING

A. Conclusion ...................................................................... 67

B. Suggestions .................................................................... 68

REFERENCES

APPENDICES

CURICULUM VITAE

REFERENCES

Alan Victor Brown, students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective teaching in the foreign

language classsroom: a comparison of ideals and rating, university of Arizona:2006,

thesis stratum one, university of Arizona, 2006.

AllportGW. Pattern and growth in personality. London: William

Clowes and Sons, Ltd.

Ary Donald, and friends, Introduction to Research in Education Eight Edition,Belmont:

Wadsworth, 2010.

Aziz SA, The need to read. The Jakarta post, January 1999

Baron RA, Byrne D, Social psychology (8th ed.). Boston, Allynand Bacon, 1991

Budi C & Nur Mukminatien, Technique and Strategies to Enchance English Language Lerning, state

university Malang press: Malang, 2011

Bhargava, Anupama. Perception of Student Teachers about Teaching Competencies,Orissa:

Education sambalpur, 2011(http://American International Journal of Contemporary

Research Vol. 1 No.1; July 2011)

Bloom, B, Englehart, M, Furst, E, Hill, W, & Krathwohl, D. Taxonomy of educational

objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain.

New York: Longmans, Green; 1956.

Borich, G. Effective teaching methods. Colombus:Merill.1998

Brown, H. Douglas. Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy.

Second Edition. A Pearson Education Company. 2001

Bruce L. BERG,Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Science, California State

University, Long Beach, 2001

Cakmak, Melek. The Perceptions of Student Teachers about the Effects of Class Size With

Regard to Effective Teaching Process, Ankara: Gazy University, 2009

(http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR14-3/cakmak.pdf) P.404

Cruikshank, Bainer & Metcalf, Teaching Method; Lesson planning, McGraw-Hill

Boston:1999

Eggen P, Kauchak D, Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. New Jersey Prentice

Hall, Inc.2001.

Elaine, Allen and Seaman, Christopher,Likert Scales and Data Analyses. Quality Progress

2007

Given, The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, California: Sage

Publication, Inc, 2008

Greenwood, J, Comprehension and reading. In G. Abbott, the Reading of English as an International

Language: A Practical guide, Glasgow: William Collins and Sons. 1981

Grabe W, Current Development in Second Language Reading Reaserch, Tesol:quarterly,

1991

Holloway, Basic Concepts for Qualitative Research, London: Hartnolls Ltd, 1997

Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B., Handbook in research and evaluation: A collection of principles,

methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in

education and the behavioral sciences 3rd

Edition, San Diego: Educational and

Industrial Testing Services. 1997

Jasiah, M.Pd, Perpustakaan Nasional Katalog dalam terbitan (KTD): Ilmu Pendidikan,

Banjarmasin:Antasari Press, 2009

Jonhson & Christensen, Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualilative, and Mixed

Approaches, 2nd

Edition, Boston: Pearson, 2004

Joseph, R. A., H. R. Markus, & R. W. Tafarodi. Gender and self-esteem. Journal

ofPersonality and Social Psychology 63:3, 1992

Leedy, Paul D, Practical Reseacrh: Planning and Design (Third Edition), New York:

Macmilan, 1981.

Mansoor Ahmed Channa, Teachers’ Perceptions Towards English Language As Medium Of

Instruction In Pakistan, Nakhon Pathom Province:Mahidol University 2011(http://

Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business,September 2012

vol.4 no 5) P.759

Mason, J.M, & Au,K.H. Reading Instruction for today .second edition. New York:Harper

Collins Publhiser.1990.

Mealey, D.L. & Nist,S.L. Post-Secondary Teacher Directed Comprehension Strategies.

Journal of Reading. 1986.

McMillan & Schumacher, Research in education: Evidance-Based Inquiry, 6th

Edition,

Boston: Pearson, 2006

Michael Swan. Practical English Usage: 3rd

Edition.London:Oxford University Press. 2005

Nasution, S. Methode penelitian naturalistik kualitatif (Ed ke-3). Bandung: PT Tarsito, 2003

Neumann, S., & Koper, R. Instructional Method Classifications Lack User Language and

Orientation. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (2) 2010

Nunan D, Secound Language Teaching and Learning, Boston, MA: Hainle, 1999.

Peter Lindsay & Donald ary, Human Information Processing: An IntroductionPsychology,

New York:Britannica Press, 1977

Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L., Survey research methodology in management

information systems: An assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems,

1993Psychology, New York:Britannica Press, 1977

Quick, D.L. and Nelson, J.C, Organisational Behavior: Foundations, Realities, and

Challenges, (New York: West Publishing Company),1997

Richards, jack and Rogers, Theodore. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge:

University Press. 1986

Rothwell, W. J. & Kazanas, H. C. Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic

approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass:1998

Sabri Ahmad, Strategi Belajar Mengajar Micro Teaching, Jakarta: Quantum Teaching, 2005

P.52-5

Sandra Lee Mckay,Researching second language classroom ,Lawrence erlabaum associates

publishers :New Jersey, 2006.

Silberman Mel, Active Learning 101 Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif, Yogyakarta : Yappendis,

2005.

S. L. Wong et al. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in

Education. Putrajaya, Malaysia:2010

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. Preventing reading failure I young children.

Washington, DC: National Academy Press: 1998

Sudjana, Nana. Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo,

2005

Sugiyono, Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2010

Tierny, R.J, & Cunningham, J.W. Research on teaching reading comprehension. In R. C. Pearson, A

Handbook of reading research. London: Logman. 1984

Wallace, Michael J. Training Foreign Language Teachers. Glasgow: CambridgeUniversity

Press, 1991.