Upload
sierra-holmes
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process
Presentation to:
Granville County
Board of Commissioners
Donnie Redmond
July 5, 2005
2
Summary
• What are the air quality issues?
• How do they affect Granville County?
• What is being done about it?
• What do you need to remember from this presentation?
3
What are the air quality issues?
• Federal Clean Air Act– Ozone– Fine particles (PM2.5)– Carbon monoxide– Greenhouse gases
• Ozone is the pollutant of primary concern– Entire metro area is included
4
How does it affect Granville County?
• Designation as “nonattainment”– New Source Review (NSR)– Transportation conformity– State Implementation Plan (SIP)
5
NC 8-hr Ozone Nonattainment Areas
6
What is being done about it?
• Attainment demonstration– Essentially, a modeling exercise to demonstrate
that the State has a valid plan to attain the standard
– I.e., computer projection of future air quality
• Redesignation request– Separate process undertaken once local field
monitors show standards have been met– I.e., actual measurement of current air
7
Attainment Demonstration
• Why is it important?– Determine whether we have to add more
environmental programs to meet the Federal standards
8
Attainment Demonstration
• How is it going?– Ozone is measured in the summer– Goal is <85ppm in ’08
Measured 94ppm ‘03
Measured 89ppm ‘04
Modeled tbd ‘08
Modeled 80ppm ‘09
9
Attainment Demonstration• What does it mean?– It looks like we will be able to show “attainment”
of the Federal ozone standard without adding new air pollution programs beyond what are already planned• Federal control measures
– Cleaner vehicles– Cleaner fuels– NOx SIP Call/Clean Air Interstate Rule
• State control measures– Better auto emissions testing procedure– Expanded auto emissions testing– Clean Smokestacks Act
10
Attainment Demonstration Timeline
• Summer 2005: Modeling results
• Fall 2005: Strategies (if needed)
• Spring 2006: Public hearings
• Fall 2006: Environmental Management Commission (EMC) approval
• Early 2007: Legislative review
• June 2007: Due to EPA
11
Redesignation Request
• Process that DAQ will undertake when actual measurement of the air shows it meets the Federal standard
• Why is it important?– Remove “nonattainment” label– Remove new source review (NSR)
12
AQ Monitor Network Overview
13
Current Ozone Values(Standard is less than 85 ppm)
County 2001-2003
average
2002-2004
average
Durham 89 86
Franklin 90 88
Granville 94 89
Person 91 87
Wake 92 88
14
Future: Potential Developments
• When we get through this current process, we cannot declare victory and go home …
• Growth assumptions may change
• Science may change– EPA is now reviewing ozone and PM
standards• Sept 2006: Fine particles• Dec 2007: Ozone
15
Local Measures• Focus on major emission sources• Reduction in vehicle miles traveled• Nonroad engines– Generators, construction equipment,
lawnmowers, etc.
• Fleet turnover• Alternative fuels• Diesel retrofit, anti-idling policies• Growth management• Episodic controls
16
What do you need to take away from this …
• We think we will be able to show that our air will meet standards in ’08 with our existing environmental programs
• We think the air will actually be under the standard this summer or next
• Be happy, but remember things may change in the future
17
For additional info
• Donnie Redmond– Asst. Chief for Planning– 919-733-1481– [email protected]
• DAQ website– www.ncair.org