57

Standards vs. Procedures

  • Upload
    didier

  • View
    43

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Standards vs. Procedures. Auditing standards differ from auditing procedures. Procedures are acts that the auditor performs during the course of an audit in order to comply with the standards. G A A S. G enerally A ccepted A uditing S tandards. OVERVIEW. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Standards vs. Procedures
Page 2: Standards vs. Procedures

Standards vs. ProceduresStandards vs. Procedures

Auditing standards differ from auditing Auditing standards differ from auditing procedures. Procedures are acts that the procedures. Procedures are acts that the auditor performs during the course of an auditor performs during the course of an audit in order to comply with the audit in order to comply with the standards.standards.

Page 3: Standards vs. Procedures

G A A SG A A SGGenerally enerally AAccepted ccepted AAuditing uditing SStandardstandards

Page 4: Standards vs. Procedures

OVERVIEWOVERVIEW

Issued by the American Institute of Issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants – AICPACertified Public Accountants – AICPA

Defined in the Statements on Auditing Defined in the Statements on Auditing Standards - SASStandards - SAS

Page 5: Standards vs. Procedures

General StandardsGeneral Standards

Field Work StandardsField Work Standards

Reporting StandardsReporting Standards

Page 6: Standards vs. Procedures

SAS 95 & 98SAS 95 & 98

General StandardsGeneral Standards Adequate proficiency and training as an Adequate proficiency and training as an

auditorauditor• The audit is to be performed by a person having The audit is to be performed by a person having

adequate technical training and proficiency as an adequate technical training and proficiency as an auditor.auditor.

IndependenceIndependence• An independent mental attitude is to be An independent mental attitude is to be

maintained by the auditormaintained by the auditor

Page 7: Standards vs. Procedures

Due Professional CareDue Professional Care Due professional care is exercised in the Due professional care is exercised in the

performance of the audit and preparation of performance of the audit and preparation of the report.the report.

Page 8: Standards vs. Procedures

Standards of Field WorkStandards of Field Work

Planning and SupervisionPlanning and Supervision

The work should be planned and any The work should be planned and any assisting auditors should be assisting auditors should be supervised.supervised.

Understanding the basic characteristics Understanding the basic characteristics of the clientof the client

Page 9: Standards vs. Procedures

Internal controlsInternal controls

• Internal controls should be evaluated Internal controls should be evaluated as a basis for relying on the records as a basis for relying on the records for testing/samplingfor testing/sampling..

Page 10: Standards vs. Procedures

Sufficient evidential matterSufficient evidential matter

Records, observations, inquiries and if Records, observations, inquiries and if necessary 3necessary 3rdrd party records should be party records should be used in determining reliable audit used in determining reliable audit results.results.

Page 11: Standards vs. Procedures

Standards of ReportingStandards of Reporting Basically apply to financial auditing, not Basically apply to financial auditing, not

tax/fee compliancetax/fee compliance

Page 12: Standards vs. Procedures
Page 13: Standards vs. Procedures

How do the standards relate to How do the standards relate to IFTA and IRP auditing?IFTA and IRP auditing?

Both the Agreement and the Plan Both the Agreement and the Plan address these standards in their address these standards in their respective Audit Procedures Manuals.respective Audit Procedures Manuals.

Page 14: Standards vs. Procedures

General StandardsGeneral Standards

Adequate training and proficiencyAdequate training and proficiency

Page 15: Standards vs. Procedures

IFTA Audit Procedures ManualIFTA Audit Procedures Manual

A200 General StandardsA200 General Standards

• .100 Training and Proficiency.100 Training and Proficiency Auditors should have adequate technical training and Auditors should have adequate technical training and

proficiency as outlined in Section A400.proficiency as outlined in Section A400.

Section A400 – Personnel Qualifications and Section A400 – Personnel Qualifications and ResponsibilitiesResponsibilities

• A410 AdministrationA410 Administration• A420 Audit StaffA420 Audit Staff

Page 16: Standards vs. Procedures

IRP Audit Procedures Manual IRP Audit Procedures Manual (proposed)(proposed)

Article 2 - General Accounting and Auditing Article 2 - General Accounting and Auditing StandardsStandards

• 201. Training and Proficiency201. Training and Proficiency• The audit is to be performed by a person or The audit is to be performed by a person or

persons having adequate technical training and persons having adequate technical training and proficiency as an auditor.proficiency as an auditor.

Page 17: Standards vs. Procedures

IndependenceIndependence

An independent mental attitude is to An independent mental attitude is to be maintained by the auditor.be maintained by the auditor.

Page 18: Standards vs. Procedures
Page 19: Standards vs. Procedures

IFTA – Audit Procedures IFTA – Audit Procedures ManualManual

A200.200 Auditor IndependenceA200.200 Auditor Independence

• Auditors should maintain independent Auditors should maintain independent mental attitudes in relating to audit mental attitudes in relating to audit assignments. The auditor must be without assignments. The auditor must be without bias with respect to the licensee under bias with respect to the licensee under audit to ensure impartiality. This audit to ensure impartiality. This independence is an obligation to fairness.independence is an obligation to fairness.

Page 20: Standards vs. Procedures

IRP – Audit Procedures Manual IRP – Audit Procedures Manual (proposed)(proposed)

Article 2, 205. Auditor IndependenceArticle 2, 205. Auditor Independence Free from personal and external Free from personal and external

impairments to independenceimpairments to independence Independent mental attitudeIndependent mental attitude Without bias with respect to RegistrantWithout bias with respect to Registrant Maintain impartialityMaintain impartiality

Page 21: Standards vs. Procedures

Due Professional CareDue Professional Care

Page 22: Standards vs. Procedures

IFTA Audit Procedures ManualIFTA Audit Procedures Manual

A200 – General StandardsA200 – General Standards .300 Professional Care.300 Professional Care

Professional care should be exercised Professional care should be exercised during the audit field work and in during the audit field work and in preparing the Interjurisdictional Audit preparing the Interjurisdictional Audit ReportReport

Page 23: Standards vs. Procedures

IRP Audit Procedures Manual IRP Audit Procedures Manual (proposed)(proposed)

Article 2 – General Accounting and Article 2 – General Accounting and Auditing StandardsAuditing Standards

202.Professional Care202.Professional Care Conducted in a professional mannerConducted in a professional manner Results clearly documentedResults clearly documented Uniform programUniform program

Page 24: Standards vs. Procedures

Standards of Field WorkStandards of Field Work

Page 25: Standards vs. Procedures
Page 26: Standards vs. Procedures

Planning and SupervisionPlanning and Supervision

Page 27: Standards vs. Procedures

IFTA Audit Procedures ManualIFTA Audit Procedures Manual

A220 Examination StandardsA220 Examination Standards .100 Preaudit analysis.100 Preaudit analysis

• Preaudit analysis shall be conducted and Preaudit analysis shall be conducted and documented. documented.

Reported informationReported information TrendsTrends

A410.200A410.200 …….There must be supervisory follow-up and .There must be supervisory follow-up and

review of the auditor’s proceduresreview of the auditor’s procedures

Page 28: Standards vs. Procedures

IRP Audit Procedures Manual IRP Audit Procedures Manual (proposed)(proposed)

Article 2, 204 – Adequate Planning and Article 2, 204 – Adequate Planning and SupervisionSupervision

Field work adequately planned and Field work adequately planned and supervisedsupervised

Standardized audit program Standardized audit program (checklist)(checklist)

Report and work papers reviewed Report and work papers reviewed and and approved by Audit Supervisorapproved by Audit Supervisor

Page 29: Standards vs. Procedures

Internal ControlsInternal Controls

Trip Sheets

Summaries

Returns/Registration

Page 30: Standards vs. Procedures

IFTA Audit Procedures ManualIFTA Audit Procedures Manual

A220.200 Examination StandardsA220.200 Examination Standards Study and EvaluationStudy and Evaluation

• Internal accounting should be evaluated in order to Internal accounting should be evaluated in order to determine if the licensee’s records can be determine if the licensee’s records can be depended on in order to perform a sample.depended on in order to perform a sample.

A640 Evaluation of Internal controlA640 Evaluation of Internal control .100 Review and documentation.100 Review and documentation

• Information-gathering phaseInformation-gathering phase• InquiryInquiry• observationobservation

Page 31: Standards vs. Procedures

• Changes in the accounting systemChanges in the accounting system• Records retainedRecords retained• Supporting documentationSupporting documentation• Identify weaknesses in the systemIdentify weaknesses in the system

Page 32: Standards vs. Procedures

IRP Audit Procedures Manual IRP Audit Procedures Manual (proposed)(proposed)

203. Study and Evaluation203. Study and Evaluation Registrant’s reporting systemRegistrant’s reporting system

• StudyStudy• EvaluateEvaluate

Sampling test work and projectionsSampling test work and projections• Reliability of internal accounting controlsReliability of internal accounting controls• Impact of any weaknesses in the controlsImpact of any weaknesses in the controls

Page 33: Standards vs. Procedures

Article 7Article 7 702. Evaluation of Internal control702. Evaluation of Internal control

• Review and documentationReview and documentation• Tests of complianceTests of compliance• Report on weaknessesReport on weaknesses

Page 34: Standards vs. Procedures

INTERNAL CONTROLS

TYPE EXAMPLES for IFTA & IRP 1. Independent approval, review,

checking or recalculation

Purchases of fuel, checking mileage & odometer computations

2. Matching of independently generated documents

Matching fuel invoices/bulk withdrawals to trip reports

3. Pre-numbering and sequence checking of key documents

Continuous odometer readings Assigning trip numbers

4. Maintenance of independent control totals

Preparing mileage and fuel summaries

5. Comparison with independent third party information

Reconciling fuel invoices to trip reports to vendor statements Reconciling bulk inventory Matching payroll data to trip reports

6. Segregation of personnel, operations, and assets

Segregation of duties among transaction initiation, approval, and recording functions

7. Timeliness of operation Reporting whole trips (mileage & fuel) in the quarter they occurred (ended) Filing quarterly returns

Page 35: Standards vs. Procedures

Sufficient Evidential MatterSufficient Evidential Matter

Page 36: Standards vs. Procedures

SAS 103SAS 103

Requires audit documentation in sufficient Requires audit documentation in sufficient detail to:detail to: Provide an experienced auditor with no Provide an experienced auditor with no

previous connection to the audit a clear previous connection to the audit a clear understanding of the work performed.understanding of the work performed.• NatureNature• TimingTiming• ExtentExtent• Results of audit procedures performedResults of audit procedures performed

Page 37: Standards vs. Procedures

The audit evidence obtained, its source and The audit evidence obtained, its source and the conclusions reached.the conclusions reached.

Requires the auditor to document audit Requires the auditor to document audit evidence that is identified as being evidence that is identified as being contradictory or inconsistent with the final contradictory or inconsistent with the final conclusionsconclusions• How the auditor addressed the contradiction or How the auditor addressed the contradiction or

inconsistencyinconsistency

Page 38: Standards vs. Procedures

IFTA Audit Procedures ManualIFTA Audit Procedures Manual

A520 Standard ApproachA520 Standard Approach Evaluate licensee’s distance accountingEvaluate licensee’s distance accounting Verify fleet miles/kilometers to source Verify fleet miles/kilometers to source

documentsdocuments Determine if distance accounting properly Determine if distance accounting properly

accumulates all operation distancesaccumulates all operation distances Verify jurisdiction allocationsVerify jurisdiction allocations

Page 39: Standards vs. Procedures

A670 Audit DocumentationA670 Audit Documentation Communicate audit resultsCommunicate audit results Document & justify proceduresDocument & justify procedures Indicate source of audit resultsIndicate source of audit results Communicate suggestions & Communicate suggestions &

recommendationsrecommendations Clearly support audit findingsClearly support audit findings

Page 40: Standards vs. Procedures

A680 Audit File ContentsA680 Audit File Contents .100 Schedules.100 Schedules

• Summary scheduleSummary schedule• Supplementary schedulesSupplementary schedules

.200 Support Documentation.200 Support Documentation• Detail informationDetail information

Actual records reviewed which support audit resultsActual records reviewed which support audit results

Page 41: Standards vs. Procedures

• Detail of retail or bulk purchasesDetail of retail or bulk purchases• Detail of bulk fuel withdrawalsDetail of bulk fuel withdrawals• Analysis of trips auditedAnalysis of trips audited

Listing of Records MaintainedListing of Records Maintained• Indicate what records are maintainedIndicate what records are maintained• If in compliance with the Agreement & the PlanIf in compliance with the Agreement & the Plan

Page 42: Standards vs. Procedures
Page 43: Standards vs. Procedures

IRP Audit Procedures Manual IRP Audit Procedures Manual (proposed)(proposed)

Article 2, 206. Working Paper Article 2, 206. Working Paper DocumentationDocumentation Working papers should be sufficiently detailed Working papers should be sufficiently detailed

so that a reviewer (internal or external) can so that a reviewer (internal or external) can understand them without extensive oral understand them without extensive oral explanations….explanations….

Page 44: Standards vs. Procedures

Working papers should:Working papers should:• Provide the principal support for the Audit reportProvide the principal support for the Audit report• Aid in the performance of and review of auditsAid in the performance of and review of audits• Facilitate third party reviewsFacilitate third party reviews• Document whether audit objectives were achievedDocument whether audit objectives were achieved• Document all planning, audit procedures Document all planning, audit procedures

performed and conclusions reachedperformed and conclusions reached

Page 45: Standards vs. Procedures

401.Adequacy of records401.Adequacy of records Consistently product required information to substantiate Consistently product required information to substantiate

applicationapplication Sufficient detail that vehicle movement may be tracedSufficient detail that vehicle movement may be traced Operational records that supportOperational records that support

• Total In-Jurisdiction DistanceTotal In-Jurisdiction Distance• Total DistanceTotal Distance

406. Accountable Distance Traveled406. Accountable Distance Traveled Registrant must record all movementRegistrant must record all movement

• InterjurisdictionalInterjurisdictional• IntrajurisdictionalIntrajurisdictional• EmptyEmpty• DeadheadDeadhead• BobtailBobtail

Page 46: Standards vs. Procedures
Page 47: Standards vs. Procedures

Standards of ReportingStandards of Reporting

Page 48: Standards vs. Procedures

IFTA Audit Procedures ManualIFTA Audit Procedures Manual

A660 Audit ReportsA660 Audit Reports .100 Licensee Audit Report.100 Licensee Audit Report

• Name and Address of licenseeName and Address of licensee• Account NumberAccount Number• Audit PeriodAudit Period• Types of records auditedTypes of records audited• Description of audit techniquesDescription of audit techniques• Net distance adjustmentsNet distance adjustments• Net tax paid fuel purchases adjustmentsNet tax paid fuel purchases adjustments

Page 49: Standards vs. Procedures

• MPG/KPL as reportedMPG/KPL as reported• Net fuel tax adjustment per jurisdictionNet fuel tax adjustment per jurisdiction• Remarks and recommendationsRemarks and recommendations• Signature of auditor or reviewing official and dateSignature of auditor or reviewing official and date

Interjurisdictional Audit ReportInterjurisdictional Audit Report• Name of base jurisdictionName of base jurisdiction• Name and address of licenseeName and address of licensee• FEI or equivalentFEI or equivalent• Reported tax by jurisdictionReported tax by jurisdiction• Audited tax by jurisdictionAudited tax by jurisdiction

Page 50: Standards vs. Procedures

• PenaltyPenalty• Interest by jurisdictionInterest by jurisdiction• Total by jurisdictionTotal by jurisdiction

Page 51: Standards vs. Procedures
Page 52: Standards vs. Procedures

IRP Audit Procedures Manual IRP Audit Procedures Manual (proposed)(proposed)

Article 8Article 8 802. Registrant Audit Report802. Registrant Audit Report

• Name and address of RegistrantName and address of Registrant• Account number and Fleet numberAccount number and Fleet number• Registration Year(s) auditedRegistration Year(s) audited• Distance traveled and percent as originally filedDistance traveled and percent as originally filed• Distance traveled and percent as a result of AuditDistance traveled and percent as a result of Audit• Amount of percent factor changeAmount of percent factor change• Net fees due each Member JurisdictionNet fees due each Member Jurisdiction

Page 53: Standards vs. Procedures

Remarks, recommendations, Remarks, recommendations, observations, and findingsobservations, and findings

Identification of any Power Units removed Identification of any Power Units removed from the Fleet w/full fees assessedfrom the Fleet w/full fees assessed

Date of issuance and name of the Date of issuance and name of the auditor(s)auditor(s)

Page 54: Standards vs. Procedures

803. Interjurisdictional Audit Report803. Interjurisdictional Audit Report Evidence of timely notification to other Evidence of timely notification to other

jurisdictionsjurisdictions• Name of Base JurisdictionName of Base Jurisdiction• Name and address of RegistrantName and address of Registrant• Account numberAccount number• Registration Year(s)Registration Year(s)• Number Apportionable VehiclesNumber Apportionable Vehicles

Page 55: Standards vs. Procedures

Reported Jurisdiction distanceReported Jurisdiction distance• In-jurisdiction distance percentagesIn-jurisdiction distance percentages• Apportionable feesApportionable fees

Brief narrativeBrief narrative Date of issuance and name of the auditor(s)Date of issuance and name of the auditor(s) Statement on adequacy of distance Statement on adequacy of distance

accounting systemaccounting system

Page 56: Standards vs. Procedures

SUMMARYSUMMARY

Both the Agreement’s and Plan’s Audit Both the Agreement’s and Plan’s Audit Procedures Manuals follow Procedures Manuals follow GGenerally enerally AAccepted ccepted AAuditing uditing SStandards to the tandards to the degree in which these standards are degree in which these standards are applicable their respective audit situations.applicable their respective audit situations.

Page 57: Standards vs. Procedures

It is the responsibility of each member It is the responsibility of each member jurisdiction to insure that all audits are jurisdiction to insure that all audits are conducted in accordance with these conducted in accordance with these standards and are applied fairly, without standards and are applied fairly, without bias, to each licensee and registrant.bias, to each licensee and registrant.