65
STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF –Pindaan 2) (CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY STANDARD – Draft Report –Rev. 2) QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR COMPLETED ROAD WORKS Descriptors: quality of workmanship, road surface, slope & retaining structure, bridge & other structures, traffic / road furniture, sampling, weightage © Copyright LEMBAGA PEMBANGUNAN INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN MALAYSIA Standard Writing Organization Lembaga Pembangunan Industri Pembinaan Malaysia CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MALAYSIA Ibu Pejabat CIDB, Tingkat 7, Grand Season Avenue, No 72, Jalan Pahang, 53000 Kuala Lumpur. P.O Box. 12278, 50772 Kuala Lumpur, Tel : 603 – 26170200 Fax: 603 – 40451808 http://www.cidb.gov.my

STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

  • Upload
    lenhan

  • View
    352

  • Download
    22

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF –Pindaan 2) (CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY STANDARD – Draft Report –Rev. 2)

QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR COMPLETED ROAD WORKS Descriptors: quality of workmanship, road surface, slope & retaining structure, bridge & other

structures, traffic / road furniture, sampling, weightage © Copyright LEMBAGA PEMBANGUNAN INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN MALAYSIA Standard Writing Organization

Lembaga Pembangunan

Industri Pembinaan Malaysia CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MALAYSIA Ibu Pejabat CIDB, Tingkat 7, Grand Season Avenue, No 72, Jalan Pahang, 53000 Kuala Lumpur. P.O Box. 12278, 50772 Kuala Lumpur, Tel : 603 – 26170200 Fax: 603 – 40451808 http://www.cidb.gov.my

Page 2: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

CONTENTS Page Committee representation iv Foreword v SECTION 1 : GENERAL 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Normative references 1 1.3 Definition 1 1.3.1 QLASSIC 1 1.3.2 Component 2 1.3.3 Newly Completed Road 2 1.3.4 Road Category 2 1.3.5 Elements 3 1.3.6 QLASSIC Assessor 4 1.3.7 Qualified Person 4 1.3.8 Approved Standards 4 1.3.9 Tolerance 4 1.4 Objective of Quality Assessment System for

Completed Road Works 5

1.5 Use of Quality Assessment System for

Completed Road Works 5

1.6 Scope of Quality Assessment System for

Completed Road Works 6

1.7 Assessment Approach 6 SECTION 2 : QUALITY STANDARD 2.1 Components 7 2.2 Elements 9 2.3 Defect Group 10 SECTION 3 : ASSESSMENT 3.1 Road Weightage 14 3.2 Sampling 15

i

Page 3: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

CONTENTS Page 3.3 Weightage Guideline for Assessment 16 3.3.1 Road Surface 16 3.3.2 Slope and Retaining Structure 17 3.3.3 Drainage 17 3.3.4 Bridge and Other Structure 18 3.3.5 Traffic / Road Furniture 19 3.4 Assessment Scoring 26 Table Table 1.1 Road Category and Description 2 Table 1.2 Road Elements by Component 3 Table 2.1 Elements and its Examples 9 Table 2.2 Defect Groups for Assessment 10 Table 3.1 Road Weightage for All Components 14 Table 3.2 Weightage for Road Surface Elements 16 Table 3.3 Weightage for Drainage 17 Table 3.4 Weightage Guideline for Bridge & Other Structure 18 Table 3.5 Weightage for Traffic /Road Furniture Element 19 Annexes A Quality Standards for Road Surface Works B Quality Standards for Slope and Retaining Structure Works C Quality Standards for Drainage Works D Quality Standards for Bridge and Other Structure Works E Quality Standards for Traffic / Roadside Furniture Works F QLASSIC Assessment Form

Component 1: Road Surface

ii

Page 4: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

CONTENTS G QLASSIC Assessment Form

Component 2: Slope and Retaining Structures

H QLASSIC Assessment Form

Component 3: Drainage

I 1 QLASSIC Assessment Form

Component 4: Above Ground Structures: Road/Pedestrian/Motorcycle Bridge

I 2 QLASSIC Assessment Form

Component 4: Underpass/Vehicular Box Culvert and Tunnel

J QLASSIC Assessment Form

Component 5: Traffic / Roadside Furniture

iii

Page 5: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR COMPLETED ROAD WORKS

SECTION 1: GENERAL 1.1 Introduction Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works is an independent method to assess and evaluate the quality of workmanship of newly completed road works based on this standard. 1.2 Normative Reference The following normative reference is indispensable for the application of this construction industry standard. For dated reference, only the edition cited applies. For undated reference, the latest edition of the normative reference (including any amendments) applies.

• Specification for Roadworks (JKR/SPJ/2008-S4: Flexible Pavement), Published by JKR Malaysia

• JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works • LLM / PLUS Specifications • Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2D/85, Manual on Traffic Control Devices: Road

Marking And Delineation, Public Work Department Malaysia • Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2B/85, Manual on Traffic Control Device: Traffic

Sign Application • Draft on Malaysia Route Numbering and Guide Signs, Published by

REAM • Guidelines for Road Drainage Design, Published by REAM • Guideline for Malaysia Toll Expressway System – Design Standard, by

Malaysia Highway Authority (LLM) • Annual Bridge Inspection Manual – Quick Inspection Guideline, by JKR • A Guide for Bridge Inspection , Published by REAM • MS 881: Pt1 : 1991 Specification for Precast Concrete, SIRIM • MS 1303 Specification for Thermoplastic Road Marking Materials, SIRIM • MS 164: Specification for Road Marking Paints, SIRIM • AS 4058: 1992 Precast Concrete Pipes (pressure and non-pressure) • Highway and Rail Transit Tunnel Inspection Manual,by U.S. Department

of Transportation 1.3 Definition For the purpose on this Construction Industry Standard the following definitions apply. 1.3.1 QLASSIC QLASSIC is the acronym for quality assessment system in construction.

1

Page 6: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

1.3.2 Component A component refers to the physical part which can be found in a road construction project. For the purpose of this standard the following components are applicable:

i. Road Surface; ii. Slope & Retaining Structure; iii. Drainage; iv. Bridges & Other Structures; and v. Traffic / Road Furniture

1.3.3 Newly Completed Roads Newly completed roads are roads which are new, not opened to traffic and as deemed fit by the Consultant. Ideally, this road has already been assessed in terms of its adherence to design specifications. The Consultant shall mean the Main Design & Supervision Consultant for the road project. Newly completed roads exclude additional and/or upgrading works carried out on to an already completed road. 1.3.4 Road Category For the purpose of this standard, the roads are divided into five (5) categories as defined below:

Table 1.1 : Road Category and Description Road

Category Description JKR Standard

A Include inter-urban expressways and highways where tolls are collected. Normally these roads are under the jurisdiction of the Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia (LLM).

JKR R6/U6 and equivalent

B Include national highways, primary state roads and roads within Federal Territories. These are inter-urban highways linking Federal Capitals, State Capitals, points of entry/exit (i.e. seaports and airports), primary roads forming the basic network linking State Capitals & major towns and roads within Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya. Normally these roads are under the jurisdiction of the Federal JKR, State JKR or Municipal Councils.

JKR R5/U5 and equivalent

2

Page 7: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Table 1.1 : Road Category and Description(cont’d) Road

Category Description JKR Standard

C Include Regional Development Scheme Roads and Secondary State Roads. These are roads forming the network within regional development areas and secondary roads within districts. These roads are under the jurisdiction of the Federal or State JKR.

JKR R4/U4 and equivalent

D Include urban collector roads and urban local streets. These roads serve as collectors and distributors offering direct access to abutting land.

Municipal Roads

E Include minor Federal Roads and roads within the village and rural inhabited area. These roads are under the jurisdiction of the Federal JKR, local authorities and District Offices.

Rural and other Federal Roads

1.3.5 Elements Elements are the physical parts of a component as specified below:

Table 1.2 : Road Elements by Components

Component Elements

1. Road Surface Carriageway Shoulder & Verge Median

2. Slope & Retaining Structure

Slope Retaining Structure Slope Drainage Above Ground Services Slope Furniture

3. Drainage Drain Drain cover Sump Box/pipe culvert

3

Page 8: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Table 1.2 : Road Elements by Components (cont’d)

Component Elements

4. Bridge & Other Structures

Above Ground Structures - Road Bridge & Pedestrian

/Motorcycle bridge Special Structures

- Underpass/Vehicular Box Culvert (VBC) & Tunnel

5. Traffic/Road Furniture Markings Traffic Calming devices Traffic Sign Electrical devices Pedestrian facilities Kerb Traffic Barrier Delineators

1.3.6 QLASSIC Assessor The QLASSIC assessor must have attended and is certified by the QLASSIC Assessors Certification Training before carrying out the assessment. The QLASSIC assessor shall be continuously updated to ensure consistency and effective implementation of this standard. 1.3.7 Qualified Person A qualified person is defined as the Superintending Officer (S.O.) or as defined by the project contract. 1.3.8 Approved Standard Approved standard shall mean this CIS standard specified by the qualified person for the project. 1.3.9 Tolerance Tolerance shall mean acceptable deviations or permissible values that do not compromise the quality of workmanship. Where applicable, the tolerances are adopted from the normative references.

4

Page 9: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

1.4 Objectives of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works. Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works was designed and developed to enable the user to achieve all/any of the following objectives:

a) to benchmark the level of quality of the road construction industry in Malaysia;

b) to have a standard quality assessment system for workmanship

quality of completed road works;

c) to assess the workmanship quality of a completed road works based on the approved standards;

d) to evaluate the performance of contractors based on the

workmanship quality;

e) to encourage continual improvements for contractors; and

f) to compile data for statistical analysis. 1.5 Use of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works The Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works is intended to complement the best engineering practices, contractual drawings and specifications in a project. It is not intended to be used independently as working specifications. The qualified person shall not use the Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works as a design standard and/or to decide if the road or parts of the road works are in accordance with the relevant Specifications and by-laws. It is still the responsibility of the qualified person to ensure that the quality of the Completed Road Works conform to approved standards, best practices, specifications and drawings. Where accessible and practical, all elements identified in this standard shall be assessed.

5

Page 10: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

1.6 Scope of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works The standard sets out the quality of workmanship for the various aspects of the construction elements for the general road works. The Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works covers five main components: Road Surface, Slope & Retaining Structure, Drainage, Bridge & Other Structures and Traffic/Road Furniture. Assessments on the workmanship are carried out based on this standard and marks are awarded if the workmanship complies with the standards. These marks are then summed up to give a total score (%) for the road works. However, the assessment excludes works and tests carried out in pre construction and during construction works. The road is assessed primarily on workmanship standard achieved through site inspection and field non-destructive testing. 1.7 Assessment Approach Assessment of the quality of workmanship is carried out upon completion of the road project and preferably, before the road is opened to traffic. This is to ensure that any non-compliance to specific standards is purely based on quality of construction and not from wear and tear of the completed road. The assessor shall inspect and assess the identified samples against the standard and tolerance using the tools specified. Prior to conducting each assessment, the assessor determines the number of samples and locations to be assessed. The number of samples and locations are selected from drawings and plans. The selected samples shall be distributed as uniformly as possible throughout the project length. All locations shall be made available for sample determination. The assessment shall only be limited to this pre-determined sample size and location and is done on the work that is inspected for the first time. Rectification and correction carried out after the quality assessment will not be re-scored. The objective of this practice is to encourage contractors towards “doing things right the first time and every time”. The assessment shall be recorded using the site assessment forms as shown in Annex F to Annex I. An objective ‘yes’ (√) or ‘no’ (x) assessment approach is adopted to indicate compliance or non compliance of the assessed component and its respective elements. A ‘-‘ is given to indicate if the element is not available for assessment. The quality score is computed based on the number of ‘√’ over the total number of elements assessed.

6

Page 11: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

SECTION 2: QUALITY STANDARD 2.1 Components The Quality Standards for Completed Road Works are divided into five main components:-

1) Road Surface The ultimate function of a road is to transport people and goods from one place to another efficiently with a desirable comfort and level of safety. A road can only serve its function and achieve its designed life if the actual construction is properly done, all the paving materials are of the required standards and meet the required design specifications. Because the road surface is in direct contact with road users, it is considered the most important component in assessing the quality of a completed road works. The road surface component is further divided into three elements namely carriageway, shoulder & verge and median. The carriageway is the part of the road where most vehicles are travelling on. The shoulder & verge is the part of the road which is adjacent to the carriageway. Vehicle would not normally use this part of the road as the shoulder act as the emergency lane. Thus the road shoulder is given less importance than the road carriageway. The median is the center part which serves as separator between carriageways. The elements are assessed in terms of its riding quality, safety and aesthetics as detailed in Annex A.

2) Slope & Retaining Structure

The slope & retaining structure component considered in this standard is only applicable to the structure that is visible after construction. The functional performance of the slope & retaining structure component has an influence on the safety as well as the comfort of the road user. This component is divided into five (5) main elements: slope (rigid, soft surface cover, rock), retaining structure, slope drainage (surface and subsurface), above ground services and slope furniture. These elements are assessed in terms of its defect groups such as crack & damage, joint, fillers and gaps, functionality, finishing and installations as detailed in Annex B.

7

Page 12: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

3) Drainage The functional performance of the drainage system of a completed road works is evaluated to ensure no flooding occurs which may affect the operations of the road. For the purpose of this standard, this component is further divided into four (4) elements: drain (not included under the Slope and Retaining Structure component), drain cover, sump and pipe/box culverts. These elements are assessed in terms of its crack & damage, joints & gaps, functionality and finishing as detailed in Annex C.

4) Bridges and Other Structures

The bridge and other structures should be constructed according to approved standards to ensure structural integrity. Repair and rectification works should be avoided as this tends to be very costly, not to mention the inconvenience to the road users. The bridges and other structures component are grouped into the different bridge/structure types: above ground structures (such as road bridges, pedestrian/motorcycle bridges) and special structures (such as underpass/vehicular box culverts and tunnels). Each of these bridges/structures is further assessed in terms of its respective elements as detailed in Annex D. For special structures such as tunnels, where practical and accessible, the assessment shall include all visible elements such as structural, mechanical, electrical, emergency response and fire protection system. Assessment of these elements shall be by visual inspection of its physical conditions and system operational.

5) Traffic / Road Furniture The Traffic / Road Furniture ideally cover a wide range of physical fixtures and markings of a road. For the purpose of this standard and for practicality of implementation, this component has been streamlined to only cover elements that will have a direct impact to the traffic operations and flow of a completed road. The elements covered in this standard are: pavement markings, traffic calming devices, traffic signs, electrical devices, pedestrian facilities, kerbs, traffic barriers and delineators. These elements are assessed in term of crack & damage, functionality, visibility, finishings and installation as detailed in Annex E.

8

Page 13: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

2.2 Elements

For each of the components identified, the elements to be assessed are identified accordingly to facilitate practical assessment and scoring system. The elements and some examples of the type of elements are summarized in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1: Elements and its Examples

Component Element Example of elements

Carriageway Asphaltic concrete

Shoulder & Verge Paved or unpaved Road Surface

Median Paved or unpaved

Slope Rigid, soft, rock surface

Retaining Structure Facing wall

Drainage Surface & Subsurface Drainage

Above ground service furniture

Water pipes, telecommunication tower

Slope & Retaining Structure

Slope Furniture Handrail and fencing

Drain Roadside, median, shoulder drain

Drain Cover R.C. Slab, M.S Grating

Sump Concrete Sump, Brickwall sump Drainage

Pipe / Box Culverts Culvert Body (steel & Concrete), Headwall & Wingwall, R.C., C.M.P. Culvert

Above ground structures (bridges)

Road bridge, Pedestrian / Motorcycle bridge Bridge & Other

Structures Special structures Box culvert, tunnels

9

Page 14: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Table 2.1: Elements and its Examples (cont’d)

Component Element Example of elements

Markings Pavement markings, pedestrian Crossing, traffic Ghost Island

Traffic Calming devices speed hump/table

Traffic Sign Warning, information signs

Electrical devices Traffic Signal, Pedestrian Push Button Signal, Variable Sign (VMS), street lighting

Pedestrian facilities Sidewalk, bus stop,

Kerb Roadside, median, traffic island kerb

Traffic Barrier Guardrail, concrete & noise barrier, crash cushion

Traffic / Road Furniture

Delineators Road studs, flexible pole

2.3 Defect Groups

Defect groups represent the parameter to benchmark the quality of workmanship. The defect groups for all components are summarized in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2: Defect Groups for Assessment

Component Element Defect Groups

Road Surface Carriageway, Shoulder & Verge, Median

1. Riding Quality 2. Safety 3. Aesthetic

Slope & Retaining Structure

Slope, Retaining structure, Slope drainage, Above ground services, Slope furniture

1. Crack and damage 2. Joint, filler and gaps 3. Functionality 4. Finishing 5. Installation

Drainage Drain, Drain Cover, sump, pipe / box culvert

1. Crack and Damage 2. Joint and Gap 3. Functionality 4. Finishing

10

Page 15: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

11

Table 2.2: Defect Groups for Assessment (cont’d)

Component Element Defect Groups

Bridge & Other Structures

Above Ground bridge (Road bridge, Pedestrian / Motorcycle bridge), Special Structures (Underpass / vehicular box culverts, Tunnel)

1. Crack and Damage 2. Joint and Gap 3. Functionality 4. Visibility 5. Finishing 6. Installation

Traffic / Road Furniture

Markings, Traffic Calming devices, Traffic Sign, Electrical devices, Pedestrian facilities, Kerb, Traffic Barrier, Delineators

1. Crack and Damage 2. Functionality 3. Visibility 4. Finishing 5. Installation

Page 16: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Figure 2.1: Typical Road Cross Section

12

Page 17: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

13

Figure 2.2 : Typical Bridge Cross Section

Page 18: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

SECTION 3: ASSESSMENT The assessment for the completed road work is carried out through a statistical and sampling approach. 3.1 Road Weightage

The road weightage for all components are allocated in accordance to the five road categories. The weightage system is aimed to provide an objective score corresponding to workmanship quality. This weightage is developed based on the drivers’ visual perception and the component’ ability to provide comfort, safety, and assistance (i.e. control) to the driver. It is deemed that each component will have different level of relevance for the different road categories, hence the different weightage as shown in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1: Road Weightage for All Components

Weightage by Road Categories (%) Components A B C D E

Road Surface 40 40 40 40 50 Slope & Retaining Structure 15 15 10 10 5

Drainage 10 10 20 20 20 Bridge & Other Structures 15 15 10 10 5

Traffic/Road Furniture 20 20 20 20 20

Total Road Weightage (%) 100 100 100 100 100

14

Page 19: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

3.2 Sampling

As it may be impractical to assess the whole length of the road projects, a sampling approach is recommended. The sample size is developed from the Statistical formula1 of:

N n = 1 + N (e)² Where, n = Sample Size N = Total Length of Road in meters / Total Numbers of

Elements e = Margin of error, the risk/error the assessor is willing to

accept, generally this is ± 5%

To determine an economical and practical sample size, a range of e value was tested as follows:

Option Low Medium High

N (m) 1000 1000 1000

e 10% 6.5% 2.5%

n 9% 19% 62%

From the above range, it is reasonable to adopt a minimum sample size of 20% or a minimum of one (1) complete sample. The maximum sample limit shall be determined by the assessor based on economic and practical considerations. As a further guideline, the assessor may adopt a minimum or a maximum sample size as follows:

• For roads < 1 km in length , the whole section shall be assessed. • For roads where most elements are available, a minimum sample

size of 20% is sufficient • For roads with limited elements, the following practical sample size

is recommended: 1 Elementary Sampling Theory, by Yamane 1967

15

Page 20: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Sample size

Mainline Road Category Intersection*

(%) Min Max Length per sample (km)

A 50% 20% 5 km 1

B1 25%

B2 50% 20% 5 km 1

C1 25%

C2 50% 20% 5 km 1

D 25%

E 50% 20% 3 km 0.5

Note: * % of the total number of intersections on the project road. The sample shall be selected based on the road chainage and each sample shall, as much as possible, cover all the 5 components to be assessed. 3.3 Weightage Guideline for Assessment 3.3.1 Road Surface The weightage for Road Surface elements are allocated as per Table 3.2.

Table 3.2: Weightage for Road Surface Elements

Weightage % Road Surface Elements Total Breakdown

1. Carriageway 70

Riding Quality 50 Safety 15 Aesthetic 5

2. Shoulder & Verge 20

3. Median 10

Total 100 Note : The highest weightage is given to the carriageway element as traffic travels on the road carriageway. Therefore, it is imperative that the carriageway is of the highest quality for functionality and safety reasons. The road shoulder acts as the emergency lane and is given a lower weightage. The lowest is given to the median which do not carry any traffic.

16

Page 21: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

3.3.2 Slope & Retaining Structure A weightage for the Slope & Retaining Structure component is not applicable as each of the elements is equally relevant in determining the functionality of the slope. The Quality Score will be based on the number of compliance over the total number of elements assessed. 3.3.3 Drainage The surface and underground drainage are equally relevant in its functionality and are given equal weightage. However, each drainage elements are weighted based on its functionality. For the purpose of the assessment, pipe/box culvert of less than 1.2m in diameter will only be visually inspected at the inlet and outlet of the culvert. Whereas pipe/box culvert of 1.2m or bigger in diameter shall be assessed on all the practical and accessible elements. The weightage for the drainage elements are shown as per Table 3.3.

Table 3.3: Weightage for Drainage

Weightage % Drainage Elements Total Breakdown 1. Surface Drain 50

Drain 30

Drain Cover 5

Sump 15

2. Pipe/Box Culvert (Underground) 50 d<1.2m d>1.2m

Culvert Body    - 40

Headwall & Wingwall    50 10

Total 100 Note : The highest weightage value is given to the drainage element that is most affected in terms of its functionality to carry off water should quality is compromised. The lowest weightage is allocated to drain cover as its function is for safety purposes

17

Page 22: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

3.3.4 Bridge & Other Structure The two (2) elements of this component (i.e.: bridges and special structures) are equally weightaged as each is equally important in its functionality. However, each of the bridge and other structural elements are weighted based on its functionality.

Table 3.4: Weightage Guideline for Bridge & Other Structures

Weightage % Bridge & Other Structures Elements Total Breakdown 50 Pier 6 Abutment 6

1. Bridge : Road / Pedestrian / Motorcycle Bridge Bearing Pad 5

Beam 6 Deck Slab 6 Surfacing 5 Expansion Joint 5 Parapet / Handrail 4 Drain Pipe 4 Staircase / ramp 2 Roof 1

50 Structure    9 Road Surface    2

2. Special Structure : Underpass / vehicular box culverts, Tunnel Drainage    2

Road Markings    2 Traffic Signs / VMS    5 Exhaust Fan / Ventilation    5 Fire Protection    5 Lighting    5 Plumbing    2 Fire Detection System    5 Communication System    2 Emergency Power System    2 Power Distribution System    2 Control Panel (control room)    2 TOTAL 100 Note : The highest weightage value is given to the structural element that is most affected interms of its functionality should quality be compromised. Accessories of the bridge (i.e.: roof, hand rail, road markings) are given lower weightage as its effect is less severe.

18

Page 23: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

3.3.5 Traffic/Road Furniture The weightage for Traffic/Road Furniture elements are shown in Table 3.5

Table 3.5: Weightage for Traffic/Road Furniture Element

Weightage % Traffic/Road Furniture Elements Total Breakdown Marking 15 Traffic Calming 10 Speed table 10 Traffic Sign 20 Electrical Devices 15 Traffic Signal 6 Pedestrian Signal 3 Variable Sign 3 Street Lighting 3 Pedestrian Facilities 10 Sidewalk 5 Bus stop 5 Kerb 10 Roadside / Median Kerb 5 Traffic Island 5 Traffic Barrier 10 Guardrail 5 Concrete / Noise Barrier 3 Crash Cushion 2 Delineator 10 Flexible Pole 6 Road Studs 4

TOTAL 100 Note: The higher weightage are allocated to the elements that controls traffic flow and gives vital information to traffic. Thus, the lower the effect to the road user, the lower the weightage.

19

Page 24: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

1. Examples of Road Surface Conditions: Riding Quality:

Joint smoothness ensures good riding quality

Poor riding quality caused by undulations

Safety:

Carriageway with sufficient crossfall and superelevation

Improper crossfall causing water to pool

Aesthetic:

Consistence surface colour Surface colour inconsistencies

20

Page 25: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

2. Different types of road surface defects:

Cracking Rutting

Shoving Bleeding

Patching Pothole

21

Page 26: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

3. Examples of Slope & Retaining Structure Conditions: Crack and Damaged:

Proper turfing – soft surface cover Visible Cracks at Rigid Surface

Stabilisation:

Anchorage points firmly fixed Signs of distress

Above Ground Furniture:

Slope furniture securely fixed Poor furniture fixtures

22

Page 27: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

4. Examples of Drainage Conditions Crack & Damaged:

Good Condition of roadside drain Vertical crack at drain wall Safety:

Grating cover painted and level to frame

Poor workmanship of grating cover and sump

Functionality:

Clean culvert inlet/outlet Siltation at culvert inlet/outlet

23

Page 28: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

5. Examples of Bridge & Other Structures Conditions Crack & Damaged:

Smooth finishing at parapet Sign of crack at parapet Joints & Gaps:

Smooth transition at joint Cracked joint Finishings:

Smooth finishing Sign of distress

24

Page 29: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

6. Examples of Traffic/Road Furniture Crack & Damaged:

Road kerbs in good and clean conditions

Road kerbs cracked and damaged

Visibility:

Road markings distinct and clean Road markings not distinct

Finishings:

Proper coverings of electrical wiring Wiring not covered

25

Page 30: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

26

3.4 Assessment Scoring The quality score of the completed road project is computed based on the number of compliance over the total number of elements assessed and is recorded in the Quality scoring form as shown in Annex J. The total number of compliance and total number of item assessed as recorded in the site assessment form are summarised in the quality scoring form. The Quality Score for each component is calculated as follow:

Total Compliance Quality Score = Σn Total Assessed

X 100%

Where, n = Component In the event that each element of a component is weightaged, the Quality Score is calculated as follow:

Total Compliance Allocated Weightage Quality Score = Σn Total Assessed

X TOTAL Actual Weightage

X 100%

Where, n = Component The actual weightage is recalculated to take into account items that are not applicable for the specific project. The quality score of each component are further weightage according to the respective road categories to derive the QLASSIC Score as follow:

QLASSIC Score = Σn Quality Score X Road

Weightage Where, n = Component An example is shown in Figure 3.1:

Page 31: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Figure 3.1: Example of Quality Score Form

27

Page 32: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐ A 1 ‐ 

ANNEX A (Information)

QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ROAD SURFACE WORKS

Item Element Standards* Tolerance Assessment Tool

1. CARRIAGEWAY 1a General Requirements

i) Riding Qualtiy

a) Joint smoothness • Construction joints are smooth and

flushed with the pavement surface

As per const. spec

3 metre

straight-edge

b) Surface Regularity • Transverse irregularities do not exceed

the allowable limit: Road Category A Road Category B Road Category C Road Category D Road Category E

≤4mm ≤4mm ≤8mm ≤8mm ≤12mm

3 metre

straight-edge

• Roughness (measured in lane IRI) is not

more than the specified value

≤2.0m/km

Walking

Profiler or equivalent

• Maximum permissible number of

longitudinal irregularities depth exceeding 4mm over a section length of 75m:

Road Category A Road Category B Road Category C Road Category D Road Category E

≤9 nos. ≤9 nos. ≤18 nos. ≤18 nos. ≤27 nos.

Rolling

Straight Edge

• Maximum permissible number of longitudinal irregularities depth exceeding 7mm over a section length of 75m:

Road Category A Road Category B Road Category C Road Category D Road Category E

≤1 nos. ≤1 nos. ≤2 nos. ≤2 nos. ≤3 nos.

Rolling Straight Edge

*Note:This standard is primarily for new roads of flexible pavements. For other types of pavements, specific requirements/standards in terms of surface regularity and surface texture shall be as per contractual agreement.

Page 33: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐ A 2 ‐ 

QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ROAD SURFACE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

1. CARRIAGEWAY (cont’d) 1a General Requirements (cont’d)

i) Riding Quality

b) Surface Regularity (cont’d) • For longitudinal direction, the maximum

surface irregularities depth must not exceed:

Road Category A Road Category B Road Category C Road Category D Road Category E

≤10 mm ≤10 mm ≤15 mm ≤15 mm ≤15 mm

ii) Safety

a) Surface Texture • Surface has sufficient microtexture

As per

construction spec

Portable Skid

resistance Tester or

equivalant

• Surface has sufficient macrotexture

As per construction

spec

Sand patch or equivalent

b) Gradient • The surface grades, crossfall, and

superelevation are functional with no waterponding

Visual/Inclinometer

iii) Aesthetics a) Surface Appearance, Defects, and Cleanliness

• No visible cracks Visual • No dragging marks

• No obstacles, wastes, loose materials

• Has consistent color

• The road surface has no improper

patching

• The road surface has no visible potholes

• The road has no excessive rutting ≤5mm 3 metre straight-edge

• The road has no visible shovings

Visual

• No visible bleeding of the pavement

Visual

• For concrete pavement, no exposed reinforcements

Visual

Page 34: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐ A 3 ‐ 

QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ROAD SURFACE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

1. CARRIAGEWAY (cont’d) 1a General Requirements (cont’d)

iii) Aesthetics b) Joints Appearance

• There are no visible cracking on construction joints

• Construction joints are not constructed on wheelpath

Visual

Visual

2. SHOULDERS AND VERGE 2a General Requirements

i) Safety a) Gradient

• The surface grades and crossfall do not cause waterponding or pose safety hazard

• Height of shoulder should not be

higher than road surface or too low

Not lower

than 50mm

Inclinometer/Visual / Steel measuring tape

ii) Aesthetics

a) Turfing & Edge Defects

• Appropriate turfing.

• No edge damage

Visual

Visual

b) Surface Appearance, Defects, and Cleanliness

Visual

• No dragging marks Visual

• No obstacles, wastes, loose materials Visual • Has consistent color Visual

• No visible shovings Visual • No undesirable disposal of waste

construction material Visual

3. MEDIAN 3a General Requirements

a) Aesthetics a) Turfing & Edge Defects

• Appropriate turfing.

• No edge damage

Visual

Visual

b) Surface Appearance, Defects, and Cleanliness

• No undesirable disposal of waste construction material

Visual

Page 35: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐B 1‐ 

ANNEX B (Information)

QUALITY STANDARD FOR SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURE WORKS

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool 1 SLOPES: ROCK, RIGID & SOFT SURFACE COVER

1a. General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible crack, damage and spalling Visual

ii) Joint, Filler and gaps

• No open joints

• No loose rock debris

• No missing or deteriorated joint filler and sealant

Visual

Visual

Visual

iii) Functionality • No eroded area/erosion scar

• No bare slope surface

Visual

Visual

iv) Finishing • No undesirable vegetation growth

• No dead, decaying or unstable trees

Visual

Visual

v) Installation • Contact with soil underneath Visual

1b. Rock Slope

i) Crack and Damage

• No severely corroded anchorage points

• No damaged wire mesh or rock netting

• No signs of cracking and any defects at rock bolt and concrete cover

Visual

Visual

Visual

ii) Installation • Anchorage points must remain intact and firmly fixed to the rock slope

Visual

2 RETAINING STRUCTURE 2a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No crack, damage and spalling of concrete surface

Visual

ii) Joint, Filler and gaps

• No missing, deteriorated joint filler and sealant

• Gaps between facing panels are free from any undesirable vegetation growth

Visual

Visual

Page 36: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐B 2‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool 2 RETAINING STRUCTURE (CONT’D)

2a General Requirements (cont’d)

iii) Functionality • No sign of distress, settlement and tension crack, deformation, tilting and bulging of the retaining structure

Visual

iv) Finishing • Should not have visual exposure of groups of coarse aggregates resulting from grout leakage

• No undesirable vegetation growth

• No debris from defense measures

• No exposed rebar

• No dislocation of masonry blocks

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

3 SLOPE DRAINAGE 3a General Requirements

i) Functionality • Free flowing and no ponding of water

• No accumulated debris, undesirable vegetation and other obstructions in drainage channel

Visual

Visual

3b Surface Drain

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible crack, damage, and spalling Visual

ii) Joint, Filler and gaps

• No missing or deteriorated joint filler and sealant

• No gaps between drainage and soil

Visual

Visual

3c Subsurface Drain

i) Crack and Damage

• No crack, damage and spalling of concrete surface

Visual

ii) Functionality • No traces of seepage

• No obstruction in weepholes and pipe ends

Visual

Visual

Page 37: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐B 3‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURE WORKS (continued) Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool 4 ABOVE GROUND SERVICES

4a Surface water carrying services

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage Visual

ii) Functionality • No leaks at exposed water carrying services Visual

iii) Installation • Pipes properly supported and bent without damage

Visual

4b Buried water services

i) Functionality • No signs of water leakage from services Visual and Leak

Detection Equipment

5 SLOPE FURNITURE 5a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No stain mark

• No visible damage / defect

• No sign of corrosion

Visual

Visual

Visual

ii) Finishing • Level and in alignment Visual

iii) Installation • Secured and safe Visual

Page 38: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐ C 1‐ 

ANNEX C (Information)

QUALITY STANDARD FOR DRAINAGE WORKS

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool 1. DRAIN 1a. General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage e.g cracks, leaks

Visual (1.2m distance from structure)

ii) Joints and Gap

• Consistent joint width and neat joint

• Consistent gap

Visual Visual

iii) Functionality • Clear and free from silt, debris and vegetation growth

• Flowing with no obstruction or ponding water

• No erosion or scour in earth channel

Visual

Visual

Visual

2. DRAIN COVER 2a. General Requirements

i) Joints and Gap

• No gaps between drain covers • No gaps between side of drain

Visual Visual

ii) Finishing

• Covers to be leveled with frames

• Grating cover to be properly painted

Visual Visual

3. SUMP 3a. General Requirements

i) Functionality

• Clear and free from silt, debris and vegetation growth

• Invert level at drain inlet is higher than drain outlet

• Sitting below invert level of incoming drains or culverts

• Free flowing with no obstruction

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

ii) Finishing • Exposed brickwork to be finished with neat joint Visual

Page 39: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐ C 2‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR DRAINAGE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

4. CULVERT 4a General Requirement

i) Functionality ii) Finishing

• Clear and free from silt, debris and vegetation growth

• Recent high water mark at up stream not higher than culvert internal diameter

• No sign of erosion/siltation

• No visible water ponding (For dry culvert)

• Free flowing with consistent gradient (for waterway crossing)

• End of pipe to be normal to the headwall and centerline of the pipe

Visual (Use torchlight)

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

(use ping pong ball)

Visual

4b Box / Pipe Culvert Body (Steel)

i) Crack and Damage

• No erosion or rusting of steel

• Steel member not fractured

• No permanent deformation

• No paint deterioration

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

ii) Joint and Gap

• No loose or missing fastener at connection

Visual

Page 40: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐ C 3‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR DRAINAGE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

4c. Box / Pipe Culvert Body (Concrete)

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage e.g large or deep cracks, leaks etc

• Free from rust stain due to corrosion of reinforcement

Visual

Visual

ii) Joint and

Gap • Assembled and jointed to line

and level

Visual

4d. Headwall and Wingwall

i) Crack and Damage

• No crack through the full thickness of the wall

• No honey combing or open texture

• Free from rust stain due to corrosion of reinforcement

• No sign of erosion, undermining and settlement

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Page 41: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐D 1‐ 

ANNEX D (Information)

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

I. ROAD/PEDESTRIAN/MOTORCYCLE BRIDGE A.

GENERAL REQUIREMENT

1)

Crack and Damage • No horizontal or vertical

crack at concrete structure • No crack or fracture at

steel member

Visual

Visual

B.

PIERS (pile cap& end, pier wall and column)

1)

2)

Crack and Damage • No rust stain/marine growth

at exposed surface • No tilt or settlement

Finishing

• No material deterioration or honey combing

• No concrete discoloration • Formwork joint not visible

Visual

Visual

Visual

C.

ABUTMENTS (Including headwall and wingwall)

1)

2)

3)

4)

Crack and Damage • no deteriorating concrete

in areas that exposed to roadway drainage

• construction joints at backwalls not crack or move

Finishing

• No rust stain in the exposed concrete

• No stain or patching • No left over foreign

material on finish surface • Formwork joint not visible

Functionality • Drains and weepholes are

clear and functioning properly

• No sign of erosion around

the abutment

Installation • Interlocking abutment (if

any) properly install

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Page 42: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐D 2‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

D.

BEARING PADS

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • No splitting or tearing,

either vertically or horizontally

• No bulging on the sides of

the pads caused by excessive compression

Finishing

• No debris/vegetation or ponding water

• No variable thickness other

than due to normal rotation of the bearing

Functionality

• No abnormal flattening due to overloading

• No displacement

Less than 3mm

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Steel measuring

tape E.

STEEL BEAM/GIRDER

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • Steel members show

neither corrosion nor rusting Joints and Gap

• No loose or missing fastener

Finishing • No deformation of steel

members

Visual

Visual

Visual

F.

CONCRETE BEAM/ GIRDER (Beam, Cross beam)

1)

Finishing • No spalling concrete,

especially at point of bearing

• Expose concrete surface

free from rust stains due to corrosion of reinforcement

• Disintegrated concrete at

area exposed to roadway drainage

• Debris and standing water

not appear at the top of cross beams

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Page 43: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐D 3‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

G.

STEEL DECK SLAB

1) Crack and Damage • Steel members are not

corroded • No deformation of steel

members

• Slab free from water leaking

Joints and Gap • No loose or missing

fastener at connection

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

H.

CONCRETE DECK SLAB

1)

2)

Crack and Damage

• No surface defect especially near the expansion joint

Finishing

• No map cracking of wearing surface which develop by reflection cracking of concrete deck

• Smooth riding transition

from one pavement segment to the next

Visual

Visual

Visual

I.

SURFACING

1)

Finishing • Pavement in good

condition with no potholes or cracks

• Proper crossfall • For pedestrian bridge, finish

materials are properly install

• No loss of bond and

delamination • No wheel track rutting • No settlement/depression

at approach slab to abutment

Visual

Visual Visual

Visual

Visual

Page 44: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐D 4‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool J.

EXPANSION JOINT

1)

2)

Crack and Damage • No water leaking • No difference in level • No abnormal spacing

Finishing

• Securely fixed/using appropriate material

≤ 10mm

Visual steel

measuring tape

Visual

K.

DRAIN PIPES

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • Pipes not damage

Functionality • Drain opening and outlet

provided and no clogging • Evenness of scupper drain • No entrapped water which

cause deterioration • No sand and debris at

drain opening • No sign of leaking

Installation • Proper drain direction • Hanger properly located

and spacing.

Visual

Visual

Visual Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual Visual

L.

PARAPET/HANDRAIL

1)

2)

3)

4)

Crack and Damage • No impact damage or

spalling at concrete Joints and Gap

• Concrete expansion joint to be neat

Installation • Handrail joint provided at

correct location • Bridge parapet consistently

align to road carriageway • Hand railing properly fixed • No loose or missing

fasteners at every joints of steel member

Finishing • Consistent painting for steel

railing • Neat concrete finishing at

all jointing

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual Visual

Visual

Visual

Page 45: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐D 5‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool M.

RAMP/STAIRCASE (PEDESTRIAN/RAMP BRIDGE)

1)

2)

Finishing • Consistent friction between

ramp surface and motorbike tyre

• Staircase with consistent step height and landing width

• Ramp with safe gradient for motorbike

Installation

• Ramp/staircase aligned with pedestrian walkway

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

N.

ROOF (PEDESTRIAN/RAMP BRIDGE)

1)

2)

Crack and Damage • No crack or damage

Finishing • Roof properly fixed with no

loose jointing

Visual

Visual

II. UNDERPASS/VEHICULAR BOX CULVERT AND TUNNEL A.

GENERAL REQUIREMENT

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • No water leakage or water

penetration through concrete/steel surface

• No settlement occur in

transition area Joints and Gap

• No loose or missing connection bolt of fabricated concrete, steel and cast iron liners.

• Gasket between

segmental tunnel liners not dislodged from the joint.

Finishing

• Colour of wall to be bright and clean

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Page 46: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐D 6‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool B.

CONCRETE STRUCTURE

1)

Crack and Damage • No crack or scaling on

structure

Visual

C.

STEEL STRUCTURE

1)

Crack and Damage • Steel members are not

corrosion and crack • No buckles and kinks

Visual

Visual

D. ROAD SURFACE

1)

Finishing • Pavement in good

condition with no pot-holes, cracks or wheel track rutting

• Proper crossfall

• No loss of bond and

delimitation

Visual

Visual

Visual

E. TRAFFIC SIGN

1)

2)

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (not

bend, broken or dented) Visibility

• Distinctly visible

Visual

Visual

F. MARKINGS

1)

Visibility • Marking is distinct and clean • Recto reflective of road

marking

Visual

Visual

G. DRAINAGE

1)

2)

Crack and Damage • No visible damage e.g

cracks, leaks Functionality

• Capable of handling water flow

• Sump pumps are clear of debris to permit free flow through the drain

Visual

Visual

Visual

Page 47: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐D 7‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool H. VENTILATION

SYSTEM (Fan, airway, louver, motor operated and dampers)

1)

2)

Finishing • All equipment in good

condition Functionality

• Fan and associated motor –operated dampers are operational

• Airways (where accessible) are free of obstruction and debris

Visual

Visual

Visual

I. CONTROL PANEL

1) Functionality • Control panel indicators

are functioning

Visual

J. PLUMBING SYSTEM

Crack and Damage • Piping is free of leakage

Functionality

• Plumbing fixtures are properly install and function

Visual

Visual

K. FIRE PROTECTION (Fire extinguishers, hose connections, piping, pumping system, circulation pumps and hose reels)

1)

2)

3)

Installation • All equipments are

properly fixed.

Finishing • Fire protection storage

tanks, alarm and level switches in good condition

Functionality

• Fire control panel is functioning

Visual

Visual

Visual

Page 48: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐D 8‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

L. POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • No sign of damage and

overheating equipment • No damage or corrosion

of wiring system Installation

• Enclosure box covers and conduit are in place and secure

Functionality

• Motor controller properly operate

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

M. EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM

1)

Functionality • System is functioning

when the normal power fails

N. LIGHTING SYSTEM

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • No visible damage of all

lightings • Bulb not burnt out

Installation

• Lighting is properly fixed and clean

Functionality

• Sufficient lighting provided

• Lighting with different ranges of nighttime and daytime illumination

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

O. FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM

1)

2)

Crack and damage • Drill switch in good

condition Functionality

• Annunciators and notification appliances are functioning

Visual

Visual

Page 49: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐D 9‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

P. COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (SCADA, CCTV Cameras, telephone and radio)

1)

Functionality • Communication devices

are functioning • Traffic signals properly

operate

Visual

Visual

Page 50: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐E 1‐ 

ANNEX E (Information)

QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool 1. PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1a General Requirements

i) Visibility • Marking is distinct and clean

• Recto reflective of road marking

White= 90mcd/lx.m² Yellow=65mcd/lx.m²

Visual

Drive on road (night) and

Rectro reflective-

meter

ii) Finishing • No other patches and spray and crack on the painting

• Markings is align to the edge line of the road

Visual

2. TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES 2a Speed Hump / Speed Table

i) Visibility • Painting is distinct and clean Visual

ii) Finishing • Interlocking pavers are properly interlocked with no missing pavers

Visual

3. TRAFFIC SIGN 3a General Requirement

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)

Visual

ii) Functionality • Mounted facing the direction of the traffic that is being served

Visual

iii) Visibility • Sign face and painting is distinct, no paint peeling and no debris on the signs

• Sign face is not obstructed by any object

• Night time visibility

Visual

Visual

Visual (Flash with Torch light)

Visual iv) Installation • Pole is sturdy, straight and secure Physical/Plumb

Bob/Spirit level v) Finishing • Proper joint and no visible gap of the

sign face • Paint of the sign pole is clean & no

patches

Visual

Visual

Page 51: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐E 2‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool 4 ELECTRICAL DEVICES : TRAFFIC/PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, STREET LIGHTING, MESSAGE

SIGNS 4a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)

Visual

ii) Functionality • All light bulb / LED are lighted

• Push button facility is operational when pressed

• Lighting covers the traffic lane continuously i.e. no zebra effect/ blackspot

Visual

Visual

Visual

iii) Visibility • Distinct and clear

• Facing the traffic lane served

Visual

iv) Finishing • Paint is clean i.e. no bleeds or patches

• Reflective border is clear and not peeling

• Made good for the footing & its surrounding

Visual

v) Installation • Pole is sturdy and vertically straight

• Wire is hidden and wire casing is closed

• No displaced grass/landscape at foundation

• All components must securely installed

Physical/Visual/Plumb

Bob/Spirit level

Visual

Visual

5 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES

5a Sidewalk and railing

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)

Visual

ii) Finishing • Surface is even and flat

• Paint is clean and distinct

• No overgrown grass

Visual

Visual

Visual

iii) Installation • Railing is sturdy

Physical/Visual

Page 52: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐E 3‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

5 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES (Cont’d) 5b Bus Stop (includes seats and railings)

i) Crack and Damage

• No sign of leaking

• Fixtures are not damaged

Visual

Visual

ii) Finishing • No overgrown grass or trees • All components must properly painted

Visual

iii) Installation • Fixtures are sturdy Physical/Visual

6 KERB : ROAD SIDE, MEDIAN, TRAFFIC ISLAND 6a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)

Visual

ii) Finishing • No overgrown grass

• Paint is clean and distinct (no patches or bleeding )

• Joint is not too wide

25mm (desirable)

Visual

Visual

Steel ruler

iii) Installation • Kerbs are installed consistently align to the alignment

7 TRAFFIC BARRIER 7a Guardrail

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)

Visual

ii) Visibility • Distinct and clean

• Reflective strips are clearly to be seen

Visual

Visual

iii) Finishing • No displaced grass/pavement at foundation / made good to the foundation

• Consistently aligned to the carriageway

Visual

iv) Installation • Guardrail post is secure

• W-beam is securely bolted to the splice and post

• Guardrail joint is not against the traffic flow

Physical/Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Page 53: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐E 4‐ 

QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

7 TRAFFIC BARRIER (CONT’D) 7b Concrete & Noise Barrier

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, cracked or chipped)

Visual

ii) Visibility • Paints are distinct & clean, no debris and no patches

• Reflective strips / sheets are clean and not bend

Visual

Visual

iii) Finishing • No overgrown grass

• No discolouration

Visual

Visual

7c Crash Cushion

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, cracked)

Visual

ii) Visibility • Reflective strips are clean Visual

iii) Finishing • No overgrown grass Visual

iv) Installation • Cartridge is inflated

• Crash cushion is facing on-coming traffic flow

Visual

8 DELINEATOR: ROAD STUDS, FLEXIBLE POLE 8a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, cracked)

• Reflective sheet not peeling

Visual

ii) Visibility • Reflective and clearly seen

• Seen during night time

Visual

Visual (night time drive)

iii) Installation • Securely installed

• Consistently aligned to the road carriageway

Visual / Physical

Visual

Page 54: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Annex FQLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORMComponent 1: Road SurfaceProject Name: Assessor 1:Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:Carriageway Type: Single/DualType of Surfacing :

Element Carriageway Shoulder and Verge Median

Sample Riding Quality Safety Aesthetics Safety Aesthetics Aesthetics

Sample ___ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Total Compliance

Total Assessment

* Tolerance Table General Category A & B Category C & D Category E

Riding Quality

i) Joint Smoothness ≤ 3 mm

ii) Surface regularity

- Traverse irregularities ≤ 4 mm ≤ 8 mm ≤ 12 mm

- Lane IRI ≤ 2.0m/km

- Longitudinal irregularities (depth >4mm over 75m) ≤ 9 nos ≤ 18 nos ≤ 27 nos

- Longitudinal irregularities (depth >7mm over 75m) ≤ 1 nos ≤ 2 nos ≤ 3 nos

- Maximum surface irregularities ≤ 10 mm ≤ 15 mm ≤ 15 mm

Safety

i) Microtexture As per Construction Specificationsii) Macrotexture As per Construction Specifications

Aesthetic

i) Rutting ≤ 5 mm

Defect Group

Page 55: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Annex GQLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORMComponent 2: Slope and Retaining StructuresProject Name: Assessor 1:Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

Elements Slopes * Retaining Structure Slope Drainange Above Ground Service Slope Furniture

General Requirements

Rock Slope

General Requirements

General Requirements

Surface Drain

Subsurface Drain

Surface Water Carrying

Buried Water

General Requirements

Sample Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Join

t, Fi

ller &

Gap

s

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Join

t, Fi

ller &

Gap

s

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

Func

tiona

lity

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Join

t, Fi

ller &

Gap

s

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Func

tiona

lity

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Func

tiona

lity

Inst

alla

tion

Func

tiona

lity

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Total Compliance

Total Assessment

Note:* = included rock slope, rigid and soft surface cover

Defect Group

Page 56: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Annex H

QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORM

Component 3: Drainage

Project Name: Assessor 1:

Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:

Carriageway Type: Single/DualCr

ack

& D

amag

e

Join

t &

Gap

Func

tiona

lity

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Join

t &

Gap

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Func

tiona

lity

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Join

t &

Gap

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Left

Median

Right

Left

Median

Right

Left

Median

Right

Left

Median

Right

Left

Median

Right

Left

Median

Right

SURFACE DRAIN CULVERTS (BOX/PIPE)

Total of Assessed

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

HEADWALL & WINGWALL

Sample _____ (KM From ___ to ____)

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

Total of Compliance

DRAIN

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

DRAIN COVER SUMP CULVERT BODY (RC/STEEL)

Sample

Defect Group

Page 57: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Anex I1

QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORMComponent 4: Above Ground Structures : Road/Pedestrian/motorcycle Bridge

Project Name: Assessor 1:

Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:

Carriageway Type: Single/DualCr

ack

& D

amag

e

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

inst

alla

tion

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Join

t &

Gap

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Join

t &

Gap

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Func

tiona

lity

Inst

alla

tion

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Join

t &

Gap

s

Fini

shin

g

inst

alla

tion

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Left

Right

Left

Right

Left

Right

Left

Right

Left

Right

Left

Right

Note : Sampling guide for Girder/beam, Pier and Bearing Pad at each bridge. Random sample selected and marked on As Built Drawing before inspection.

1. Less than 50 numbers = 5 numbers sample

2. 51 to 100 numbers = 10 numbers sample

3. More than 100 numbers = 15 numbers samples

Elements Above ground Structures

Drain Pipe/Drain Opening

Parapet / Handrail Ramp / Staircase

RoofSurfacing Expansion JointPier Abutments

Bearing Pad Steel Beam / Girder Concrete Beam / Girder

Steel Deck Slab

Concrete Deck Slab

Sample _____ (km ______

Total Compliance

Total Assessed

Sample

Sample ____ (km ______

Sample _____ (km ______

Sample _____ (km ______

Sample _____ (km ______

Sample _____ (km ______

Defect Group

Page 58: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Annex I2

QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORMComponent 4: Underpass/Vehicular Box Culvert and Tunnel

Project Name: Assessor 1:

Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:

Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

Concrete Structure

Steel Structure

Road Surface

Markings Control Panel Emergency Power System

Fire Detection

System

Communication System

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Join

t &

Gap

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Visi

bily

Visi

bily

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Func

tiona

lity

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

Func

tiona

lity

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Func

tiona

lity

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Func

tiona

lity

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Func

tiona

lity

Inst

alla

tion

Crac

k &

Dam

age

Func

tiona

lity

Inst

alla

tion

Func

tiona

lity

Func

tiona

lity

Left

Right

Left

Right

Left

Right

Left

Right

Left

Right

Underpass / Vehicular Box Culverts and Tunnel

Drainage Ventilation System

Plumbing System

Traffic Signs Fire Protection Power Distribution

System

Lighting SystemGeneral Requirements

Total Assessed

Elements

Sample

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Total Compliance

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Defect Group

Page 59: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

Annex JQLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORMComponent 5: Traffic/Roadside FurnitureProject Name: Assessor 1 :Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

Visi

bilit

y

Fini

shin

g

Visi

bilit

y

Fini

shin

g

Cra

ck &

Dem

age

Func

tiona

lity

Visi

bilit

y

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dem

age

Func

tiona

lity

Visi

bilit

y

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dem

age

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dem

age

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dem

age

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dem

age

Visi

bilit

y

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dem

age

Visi

bilit

y

Fini

shin

g

Cra

ck &

Dem

age

Visi

bilit

y

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dem

age

Visi

bilit

y

Inst

alla

tion

Left

Median

Right

Left

Median

Right

Left

Median

Right

Left

Median

Right

Left

Median

Right

Note:* = include Traffic / Pedestrian Signal, Street Light, Massege Sign

** = include Road side, Median and Traffic island kerbs

*** = include Road Studs and Flexible Pole

Speed Hump / Table

Kerb**

Concrete & Noise Barrier

Pavement Markings

General Requirements

Traffic Sign

General Requirements

Traffic Calming Devices

General Requirements

Total Assessment

Sample ___ (km From ________ to _____)

Sample ___ (km From ________ to _____)

Element

Total Compliance

Sample ___ (km From ________ to _____)

Sample ___ (km From ________ to _____)

Sample

Sample ___ (km From ________ to _____)

Delineator***

General Requirements

Traffic BarrierElectrical Devices* Pedestrian Facilities

Sidewalk & Railing Crash CushionGuardrailGeneral Requirements Bus stop (Seats & railing)

Defect Group

Page 60: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

ANNEX K (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF ROAD SURFACE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE

• Joints are smooth and flushed

As per Construction Specifications

A 4mm B 4mm C 8mm D 8mm

• Maximum Transverse Regularity

E 12mm • International

Roughness Index 2 m/km

>4mm >7mm >10mm >15mm A 9 nos. 1 nos. 0 0 B 9 nos. 1 nos. 0 0 C 18 nos. 2 nos. 2 nos. 0 D 18 nos. 2 nos. 2 nos. 0

Riding Quality

• Maximum number of longitudinal regularities exceeding allowable limit, over a traverse length of 75m

E 27 nos. 3 nos. 3 nos. 0 • Microtexture As per Construction Specifications • Macrotexture As per Construction Specifications

Safety

• Gradient Water drainable (No water ponding)

Carriageway

Aesthetics • No cracks/dragging marks/patching

• No loose material/potholes

• No excessive rutting • No shovings/

bleedings • No exposed

reinforcement (concrete)

• Joints not cracked/on wheelpath

≤5mm

Safety • No waterponding • Shoulder not too low

Not lower than 50mm

Shoulder and Verge

Aesthetics

• No cracks/dragging marks/patching

• No loose material/potholes

• No overgrown turfing • No damaged edge

of pavement • No shovings/

bleedings • No undesirable

construction waste

Median

Aesthetics • No overgrown turfing • No damaged edge

of pavement • No undesirable

construction waste

‐K 1‐ 

Page 61: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

ANNEX L (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURES WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Crack & Damages

• No visible crack, damages and spalling • No corroded anchorage points (rock

slope) • No damaged wire mesh/rock netting

Joints, filler & gaps

• No open joints/loose debris • No missing/deteriorated fillers/sealant

Functionality • No eroded area/bare surface Finishing • No undesirable vegetation/dead

/unstable trees

Slope

Installation • Contact with soil underneath • Anchorage is intact & firmly fixed (rock

slope) Crack and Damage

• No visible crack, damages and spalling

Joint, fillers & gap • No missing/deteriorated fillers/sealant • No undesirable vegetation at panel gaps

Functionality • No signs of distress, settlement, deformation, tilting, bulging

Retaining Structure

Finishing • No exposed aggregates/rebar • No undesirable vegetation • No dislocation of masonry blocks

Crack & Damage • Crack, damage and spalling Joint, fillers & gaps • No missing and deteriorated joint

fillers/sealant • No gaps between drainage & soil (surface

drain)

Slope Drainage

Functionality • No seepage • No obstruction in weepholes/pipe ends

Crack & Damage • No visible damage/ Functionality • No leaks

Above ground services

Installation • Pipes properly supported, not damaged Crack & Damage • No stain marks/visible damage/corrosion Finishing • Level and in alignment

Slope Furniture

Installation • Secured/sturdy

‐L 1‐ 

Page 62: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

ANNEX M (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR DRAINAGE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Crack and Damage

• No visible damages/cracks

Joint and Gap • Consistent joint width and neat • Consistent gap

Drain

Functionality

• Clear and free from silt/debris/vegetation

• Free flowing with no ponding water • No visible erosion or scouring in earth

channel

Joint and Gap • No gaps between drain covers, side of drain

Drain Cover

Finishing • Covers level with frame • Gratings painted properly

Functionality • Clear and free from silt/debris/vegetation

• Free flowing with no ponding water • Inlet invert level is higher than outlet • Sitting below invert level of incoming

drain

Sump

Finishing • Neat joints

Crack and Damage

• No erosion/rusting/deformation (steel culvert)

• No honey combed/open texture (headwall/wingwall)

Functionality • Clear and free from silt/debris/vegetation

• Water mark level at up stream not higher than culvert internal diameter

• Free flowing with consistent gradient and no ponding (dry culvert)

Jointing and Gap

• Assembled and jointed to line and level (concrete culvert)

• No loose or missing fastener (steel culvert)

Crack and Damage

• No visible damage/defect

Culvert

Finishing

• End pipe normal to headwall and centre • Surface smooth and even • Free from rust stain

‐M 1‐ 

Page 63: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

ANNEX N (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGE & OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Crack and Damage

• No visible crack/defect/fracture • No corrosion/ fracture/deformation of

steel members • No tilt/settlement (pier, expansion joint) • No deterioration of concrete (abutment) • No splitting/tearing/bulging (bearing

pads) • No abnormal spacing (expansion joint) • No leakages (drain pipes)

Jointing and Gap

• No cracked joints (abutment, joint) • No loose/missing fastener (steel

beam/girder, slab, roof)

Functionality • Drains/weepholes/outlets are clear • No abnormal flattening (bearing pads) • No debris / ponding water (beams, slab,

drain) • Evenness (scupper drain)

Finishing

• No deterioration/honey comb (pier, beam)

• No debris/vegetation/ponding (bearing pads)

• No variable thickness other than normal rotation (bearing pads)

• No deformation of steel members (steel beam/girder)

• No spalling concrete • No rust stains • No pot holes (surface) • Proper crossfall (surface) • No rutting (surface) • Consistent painting • Consistent step height & landing width

(stairs) • Safe gradient (motorcycle ramp)

Above ground structure / bridge

Installation

• Hanger properly located and spaced (drain pipes)

• Fixtures securely fixed (handrail) • Consistently aligned to road (parapet) • Ramp/staircase aligned to pedestrian

walkway

- N - 1

Page 64: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGE & OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (cont’d)

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Crack and Damage

• No water leakages • No settlement • No crack/spalling • No corrosion/buckle/kinks • No visible damage/cracks • No overheating (equipments)

Jointing and Gap

• No loose/missing connection bolt • No dislodged gasket

Underpass / Vehicle Box Culvert, Tunnel

Functionality

• No ponding • Clear of debris/obstruction (drain, airways) • Equipments are operational (dampers,

control panel, fire control, communication) • Equipments are operational when power

failure (emergency power system) • No burnt bulbs • Consistent lighting (no blackspots/zebra

effects)

Finishing

• Clean wall • No potholes/cracks/wheel track rutting

(surface) • Proper crossfall • No loss of bond/delimination (surface) • Equipments in good condition/clean

Visibility • Markings is distinct (pavement marking) • Recto reflective of road markings

Installation

• Equipments are securely installed (lightings, electrical equipments)

• Box covers are in place & secure

- N - 2

Page 65: STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (LAPORAN DERAF ... - JKR …jkrmarang.terengganu.gov.my/files/Muat Turun/Quality_Assesment... · • JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works

‐O 1‐ 

ANNEX O (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC & ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Visibility • Marking is clearly seen

• Night time visibility

Pavement Markings Finishing • No other patches / crack

• Properly / uniformly align

Visibility • Marking is clearly seen Traffic Calming Device

Aesthetic • No missing pavers

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Functionality • Sign is facing on-coming traffic Visibility • Marking is clearly seen

• Night time visibility

Installation • Sturdy & straight

Traffic Sign

Finishing • No visible gap & proper joint of the signage face

• Paint of the signage pole is clean & no patches

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Functionality • All bulb & LED is lighted

• Push button is functional when pressed • No blackspot and zebra effect

Visibility • Message/Symbol is clearly seen Finishing • Paint/reflective border is clean/not peeling

• Made good at foundation

Electrical Devices

Installation • Sturdy & straight • Wiring is hidden & covered • No displace turfing at foundation

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) • No leakage (bus stop)

Finishing • Surface is flat & even • Paint is clean • No overgrown grass

Pedestrian Facilities

Installation • Fixtures are sturdy Crack & Damage • No visible damage (crack, broken) Finishing • No overgrown grass

• Painting is clean • Kerb joints not too wide

Kerb

Installation • Consistently aligned to road Crack & Damage • No visible damage (crack, broken, dented) Visibility • Clearly seen (day & night) Finishing • No displaced grass at foundation

• No discolouration (concrete/noise barrier) • Consistently aligned to road

Traffic Barrier

Installation • Post is secure/securely bolted • Joint is not against traffic flow • Cartridge is inflated (crash cushion)

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (crack, broken) Visibility • Clearly seen (day & night)

Delineator

Installation • Securely installed • Consistently aligned to road