12
developing people, improving young lives developing people, improving young lives Development directorate Stakeholder mapping Spring 2007

Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

developing people, improving young lives   developing people, improving young lives  

Development directorate

Stakeholder mapping

Spring 2007

Page 2: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

2

Who typically gets involved?

Reference GroupEnsure that it works

Change TeamCome up with the

solution

SponsorsOwn the requirement

UsersReap the benefits

Page 3: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

3

Tools we could use: Stakeholder mapping

What is it?

• A graphical illustration of how your stakeholders are disposed towards your change project

• Helps you to identify who you need to influence and what action to take

When would you use it?

• Early in your project – at the Mobilise and Discover stages

• Revisit in later stages as you evaluate efforts to improve positive attitudes and engage stakeholders

Are there any rules?

• Never print or leave your map lying about – can be very sensitive!

Page 4: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

4

Mapping stakeholder dispositions (1)

Involvement

Against For

Page 5: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

5

Mapping stakeholder dispositions (2): examples

Involvement

Against For

The enemy; takingevery opportunityto undermine yourefforts

Change champion;takes personal responsibility for ensuring success

Fence sitter;not engaged;waiting to seehow it goes

The cynic; firescheap shots to testyour resolve

Willing helper;anxious to lenda hand

Page 6: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

6

Worked example: A school change initiative

Involvement

Against For+5-5

0

10

Deputy head

Headteacher

Admin 1

Part-time teacher

ParentsChair of

Governors

Governing body

SMT

Admin 2

Full-timeteaching

staff

LSA

Key: Size of circle = degree of influence on change

Page 7: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

7

Illustrating relationships

Involvement

Against For+5-5

0

10

Deputy head

Headteacher

Admin 1

Part-time teacher

ParentsChair of

Governors

Governing body

SMT

Admin 2

Full-timeteaching

staff

LSA

Key: Thickness of line = strength of relationship

Page 8: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

Active

Against For

Passive

Page 9: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

Active

Against For

Passive

The enemy; Takes every opportunityto undermine yourefforts

The lazy cynic; Fires cheap shots to testyour resolve

Fence sitter;Not engaged;waiting to seehow it goes

Willing helper;Anxious to lenda hand

Change champion;Takes personal responsibility for ensuring success

The talker;For the change but not willing to play a part

Page 10: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

Active

Against For

Passive

Mike

Sally

David

Tom

Susan

Rob

Jeff

Bob

Lisa

KeyLarger the bubble = greater the influenceThickness of line = strength of relationshipBrown line = positive relationshipRed line = negative relationship

Rachael

Jane

Page 11: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007
Page 12: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007