21
Page 1 TO: FOR: FROM: General Manager X Vote Dept.: General Manager Author: Robert B. Davis X Board Members Information Subject: Authorization to implement schematic designs of a one-story terminal building and a two-story utility building for the Woods Hole site STAFF SUMMARY Date: November 15, 2019 File# GM-735 PURPOSE: To obtain authorization from the Members to direct BIA.studio, the Authority’s architects for the Woods Hole terminal reconstruction project, to undertake revised schematic design phase services for a new one-story terminal building and a new two-story utility building at the Woods Hole site. BACKGROUND: Following the Board’s meeting at the Falmouth High School on June 18, 2019, staff and the Authority’s architects reviewed and considered the public comments obtained during the meeting. It was clear from the public comments that members of the community were unhappy with the three (3) design options that were presented and under consideration. There was a general consensus that the Authority should reconsider its potential options in light of the public comments. Over the next several weeks, staff and the Authority’s architects revisited the proposed site plan for the project, the Authority’s program space requirements, and the project’s permitting in an attempt to address the community’s concerns while also ensuring that the Authority’s operational needs are met. After further consideration and discussion, the Authority’s architects, with the staff’s guidance and input, developed a new conceptual one-story terminal building design situated within the footprint of the previous terminal building design along with an increase to the size of the two-story utility building situated in the location of the current freight shed building. The new two-story utility building includes several of the program space requirements that were previously situated on the upper stories of the terminal building’s previous designs. The enclosed concept designs for the Woods Hole site illustrates the aforementioned design efforts. The footprint of the one-story terminal building increases slightly to accommodate the building’s mechanical, electrical and telecommunications, and data equipment, but its overall size is reduced from previous design efforts. The one-story terminal building design incorporates an array of solar panels on its roof, as well as solar canopies over the bus pickup and drop off areas. Initial estimates indicate that the solar panels may generate approximately fifty percent (50%) of the terminal building’s electrical needs. If the Board authorizes the General Manager to pursue the new design concept, staff intends to pursue governmental grants to defer some of the costs of the solar panels and canopies.

Staff Summary GM-735 Authorization for One Story Terminal

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1

TO:  

FOR: FROM:

 

 

General Manager

X  Vote Dept.: General Manager

Author: Robert B. Davis

 

Board Members

  Information Subject: Authorization to implement schematic designs of a one-story terminal building and a two-story utility building for the Woods Hole site  

STAFF SUMMARY Date: November 15, 2019 File# GM-735   

 

 

 

    

PURPOSE:

To obtain authorization from the Members to direct BIA.studio, the Authority’s architects for the Woods Hole terminal reconstruction project, to undertake revised schematic design phase services for a new one-story terminal building and a new two-story utility building at the Woods Hole site.

BACKGROUND: Following the Board’s meeting at the Falmouth High School on June 18, 2019, staff and the Authority’s architects reviewed and considered the public comments obtained during the meeting. It was clear from the public comments that members of the community were unhappy with the three (3) design options that were presented and under consideration. There was a general consensus that the Authority should reconsider its potential options in light of the public comments. Over the next several weeks, staff and the Authority’s architects revisited the proposed site plan for the project, the Authority’s program space requirements, and the project’s permitting in an attempt to address the community’s concerns while also ensuring that the Authority’s operational needs are met. After further consideration and discussion, the Authority’s architects, with the staff’s guidance and input, developed a new conceptual one-story terminal building design situated within the footprint of the previous terminal building design along with an increase to the size of the two-story utility building situated in the location of the current freight shed building. The new two-story utility building includes several of the program space requirements that were previously situated on the upper stories of the terminal building’s previous designs.

The enclosed concept designs for the Woods Hole site illustrates the aforementioned design efforts. The footprint of the one-story terminal building increases slightly to accommodate the building’s mechanical, electrical and telecommunications, and data equipment, but its overall size is reduced from previous design efforts. The one-story terminal building design incorporates an array of solar panels on its roof, as well as solar canopies over the bus pickup and drop off areas. Initial estimates indicate that the solar panels may generate approximately fifty percent (50%) of the terminal building’s electrical needs. If the Board authorizes the General Manager to pursue the new design concept, staff intends to pursue governmental grants to defer some of the costs of the solar panels and canopies.

Page 2

Following the development of the enclosed concept design, staff met with several of the Authority’s immediate neighbors who live near and around the Woods Hole site. In addition, staff attended the Town of Falmouth’s Board of Selectmen meeting on Monday, October 7, 2019, where Falmouth Member Kathryn Wilson and Robert Davis presented the new design concepts to the Selectmen and the members of the public in attendance. Following that presentation to the Falmouth Selectmen, staff along with Kathryn Wilson met with the Woods Hole Community Association as well as the Woods Hole Business Association. On each occasion, the new design concepts have been well-received and, since their publication, the Authority has received positive feedback from the community as well as its employees.

At its meeting on November 6, 2019, the Port Council reviewed the enclosed concept design for the

Woods Hole site and voted to recommend that the Members vote to authorize the General Manager to direct BIA.studio to undertake schematic design phase services for a new one-story terminal building and a new two-story utility building at the Woods Hole site based upon the enclosed concept design.

RECOMMENDATION:

For the following reasons, the staff recommends that the Members vote to authorize the General Manager to direct BIA.studio to undertake schematic design phase services for a new one-story terminal building and a new two-story utility building at the Woods Hole site based upon the enclosed concept design in response to the public comments the Authority has received since the Board’s evening meeting on June 18, 2019, as follows:

1. Both buildings combined must be able to accommodate all of the Authority’s program space requirements.

2. The one-story terminal building shall be located within the footprint for the building and plaza as shown on the current proposed site plan for the project, and its first-floor elevation shall be as set forth in the proposed site plan.

3. The one-story terminal building shall incorporate an array of solar panels on its roof, as well as solar canopies over the bus pickup and drop off areas.

4. The one-story terminal building must be designed to be dry floodproofed to an elevation of at least seventeen (17) feet NAVD88, as originally recommended by the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management in 2014 and described on pages 2-4 of the Authority’s supplemental MEPA submission for this project, dated October 2, 2015, under the title “The Intersection of Climate Change and Accessibility.”

 

Page 3

5. The new two-story utility building shall be situated in the location of the current freight shed building.

6. Both buildings and the terminal site should incorporate principles of sustainable design and environmental conservation as are practicable and economically feasible.

7. Both buildings must comply with all existing and applicable codes, standards, regulations, permits, licenses and other approvals for the project, including but not limited to, the approval of the Town of Falmouth’s Conservation Commission.

8. Should the one-story design concept and two-story utility building concept be found to be unacceptable by any of the relevant permitting agencies, the General Manager shall direct BIA.studio to proceed with the two-story gable roof design option previously described to the Board at its meeting on June 18, 2019 so as to continue with the progress of this phase of the terminal reconstruction project.

________________________

Robert B. Davis General Manager

Terminal Concept Design 2019.10

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction October 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Terminal Concept Design Option History

VERSION DESCRIPTION

2017.1 Flat Roof with 40’ Open PergolaJune

2017.2 Shed Roof with 40’ Plaza CoverJune

2017.3 Saltbox - 40’ Plaza Cover (60’ Cover Alternate)June

2017.4 Saltbox - 40’ Open PergolaJune

2017.5 Saltbox - 40’ Sloped CanopyJune

5 bertaux + iwerks architects

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8SALTBOX  (x3) SALTBOX  (x2) GLAZED  SALTBOX  (x3) GLAZED  SALTBOX  (x2) SALTBOX  (x1)  +  FLAT  (x2) FLAT  (x3) BUTTERFLY  (x1) BUTTERFLY  (x2)

BIA  RATING

PLAZA  PASSENGER  COVERAGE 275 125 275 125 275 275 85 225

PLAZA  +  PIER  PASSENGER  COVERAGE 550 400 550 400 550 550 360 500

GOES  WITH  SALTBOX  FORM YES YES YES YES SOMEWHAT NO NO NO

GLASS  TYPE SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT SLOPED  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS FLAT  GLASS FLAT  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS

GLASS  MAINTENANCE MINIMAL MINIMAL DIFFICULT  ACCESS DIFFICULT  ACCESS MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE

DRAINAGE EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS

VIEW  FROM  WAITING  ROOM  TOWARDS  VILLAGE CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR OBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATED

COVERAGE  AT  BUILDING  ENTRY YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO

Design Options

5 bertaux + iwerks architects

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8SALTBOX  (x3) SALTBOX  (x2) GLAZED  SALTBOX  (x3) GLAZED  SALTBOX  (x2) SALTBOX  (x1)  +  FLAT  (x2) FLAT  (x3) BUTTERFLY  (x1) BUTTERFLY  (x2)

BIA  RATING

PLAZA  PASSENGER  COVERAGE 275 125 275 125 275 275 85 225

PLAZA  +  PIER  PASSENGER  COVERAGE 550 400 550 400 550 550 360 500

GOES  WITH  SALTBOX  FORM YES YES YES YES SOMEWHAT NO NO NO

GLASS  TYPE SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT SLOPED  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS FLAT  GLASS FLAT  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS

GLASS  MAINTENANCE MINIMAL MINIMAL DIFFICULT  ACCESS DIFFICULT  ACCESS MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE

DRAINAGE EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS

VIEW  FROM  WAITING  ROOM  TOWARDS  VILLAGE CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR OBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATED

COVERAGE  AT  BUILDING  ENTRY YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO

Design Options

5 bertaux + iwerks architects

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8SALTBOX  (x3) SALTBOX  (x2) GLAZED  SALTBOX  (x3) GLAZED  SALTBOX  (x2) SALTBOX  (x1)  +  FLAT  (x2) FLAT  (x3) BUTTERFLY  (x1) BUTTERFLY  (x2)

BIA  RATING

PLAZA  PASSENGER  COVERAGE 275 125 275 125 275 275 85 225

PLAZA  +  PIER  PASSENGER  COVERAGE 550 400 550 400 550 550 360 500

GOES  WITH  SALTBOX  FORM YES YES YES YES SOMEWHAT NO NO NO

GLASS  TYPE SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT SLOPED  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS FLAT  GLASS FLAT  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS

GLASS  MAINTENANCE MINIMAL MINIMAL DIFFICULT  ACCESS DIFFICULT  ACCESS MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE

DRAINAGE EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS

VIEW  FROM  WAITING  ROOM  TOWARDS  VILLAGE CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR OBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATED

COVERAGE  AT  BUILDING  ENTRY YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO

Design Options

5 bertaux + iwerks architects

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8SALTBOX  (x3) SALTBOX  (x2) GLAZED  SALTBOX  (x3) GLAZED  SALTBOX  (x2) SALTBOX  (x1)  +  FLAT  (x2) FLAT  (x3) BUTTERFLY  (x1) BUTTERFLY  (x2)

BIA  RATING

PLAZA  PASSENGER  COVERAGE 275 125 275 125 275 275 85 225

PLAZA  +  PIER  PASSENGER  COVERAGE 550 400 550 400 550 550 360 500

GOES  WITH  SALTBOX  FORM YES YES YES YES SOMEWHAT NO NO NO

GLASS  TYPE SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT SLOPED  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS FLAT  GLASS FLAT  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS SLOPED  GLASS

GLASS  MAINTENANCE MINIMAL MINIMAL DIFFICULT  ACCESS DIFFICULT  ACCESS MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE

DRAINAGE EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS EDGE  GUTTERS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS INTERNAL  ROOF  DRAINS

VIEW  FROM  WAITING  ROOM  TOWARDS  VILLAGE CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR OBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATEDOBSTRUCTED,  NOT  

INTEGRATED

COVERAGE  AT  BUILDING  ENTRY YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO

Design Options

VERSION DESCRIPTION

2017.6 Saltbox with Roof Extension over Plaza 2 & 3 Bay VersionsDecember - April 2018

2017.7 Saltbox with Glass Roof over Plaza2 & 3 Bay Versions December - April 2018

2017.8 Saltbox with Flat Pergola over Plaza2 & 3 Bay Versions December - April 2018

2017.9 Saltbox with Canopies over Plaza2 & 3 Bay VersionsDecember - April 2018

2017 2017 - 2018

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Terminal Concept Design Option History

VERSION DESCRIPTION

2018.1 Saltbox with Flat Glass Pergola on 3 SidesUmbrellas Added to PlazaAugust -October

2018.2 2 Story Flattened Saltbox,Ridge 5’ Lower, Both 123’ and 113’ L VersionsNovember - December

2018.4 2 Story Gable with Shed, 123’ LDecember

2018.3 3 Story Tower, Reduced to 113’ LDecember

2018

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

VERSION DESCRIPTION

2019.1 Reduced Height Saltbox, 113 LRevised ProgramFebruary

2019.2 2 Story Flattened Saltbox, Reduced to 113’ LJanuary - March

2019.3 2 Story Flattened Gable, 1 Story Waiting Room,Reduced to 113’ LJanuary - March

2019.4 2 & 3 Story Crossing Gable, Reduced to 113’ LJanuary - March

2019.5 2 Story Flattened Gable - Shifted NorthwardJune

VERSION DESCRIPTION

2019.6 2 Story Flattened Gable - Shifted Northward & MirroredJune

2019.7 2 Story Pitched Roof, 1 Story over Waiting Room, Reduced to 113’ LJuly - August

2019.8 2 Story Pitched Roof, 1 Story over Waiting Room - Mirrored PlanReduced to 113’ LJuly - August

2019.9 1 Story Flat Roof with Solar Panels, 133’ L 2 Story Utility Building with Staff OccupancyJuly - August

2019.10 1 Story Flat Roof with Solar Panels, 123’ L 2 Story Utility Building with Staff OccupancyJuly - August

Terminal Concept Design Option History

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Alternative Terminal Designs 3/28/2019

BIA .studio

Three-Story Crossing Gable Roof

Gable Roof

Reduced Saltbox Roof

Previous Option

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Alternative Terminal Designs 3/28/2019

BIA .studio

Three-Story Crossing Gable Roof

Gable Roof

Reduced Saltbox Roof

Previous Option

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Alternative Terminal Designs 3/28/2019

BIA .studio

Three-Story Crossing Gable Roof

Gable Roof

Reduced Saltbox Roof

Previous Option

ATM

LUGGAGE PICK-UP

EL 10' - 6"

EL 8' - 6"

EL 10' - 6"

JAN

N

0

bertaux + iwerks architects118 South Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110t: 617.423.6500 w: www.bi-arch.com

Childs Engineering CorporationMarine Engineering34 William Way, Bellingham, MA 02019

DG Jones InternationalCost Estimating3 Baldwin Green Common, Suite #202Woburn, MA 01801

Carol R Johnson AssociatesLandscape Architecture

GZA GeoEnvironmentalGeotechnical, Environmental, Civil Engineering530 Broadway Providence, RI 02909

115 Broad St, Boston, MA 02110

Kalin AssociatesSpecifications1121 Washington Street #2West Newton, MA 02465

Thornton TomasettiStructural Engineering27 Wormwood Street Suite 200Boston, MA 02210

WSPMEP / FP / Security/ Site Elec /Lighting88 Black Falcon Avenue, Suite 210Boston, MA 02210

Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & NantucketSteamship AuthorityFoot of Railroad AvenueWoods Hole, MA 02543

Drawn By:

Checked By:

Date:

Scale:

Design Phase:

Seal:

4'-0" 8'-0" 16'-0"

Sheet No.Phase

5

1/8" = 1'-0"

Woods Hole FerryTerminal Reconstruction

A101

Author

Checker

07/21/17

First Floor Plan -Presentation

Community Redesign

Issue / Revision Schedule

No. Revision Date

2019

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction October 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal

BULKHEAD

PAVED PARKING

CONCRETE ABU

BRIDGE ABOVE

ABUTMENT WALL

CONCRETE

COWDR

27'

12.85'

14.58' CANOPY

CANOPY

TRANSFER BRIDGE 1

1

S

N

2

3

FLOATING

PLATFORM 1

14.54'

TRANSFER BRIDGE 3

8.0'

TRUCK STAGING AREA

ENTRY BOOTH 1

ENTRY BOOTH 2

FENCE

ACTI

VE P

ICK-

UP

AN

D D

ROP-

OFF

BUS

BUS

BUS

Sola

r Can

opy

Sola

r Can

opy

Sola

r Can

opy

8.13'

8.85'

13.92'

9.92'

10.5'

10.0'

10.5'

10.5'10.5'

10.5'

10.5'

AUTO STAGING AREA

ENTRY

7.0'

STAGING BOOTH

CRAN

E ST

COWDRY RD

JUN

IPER

PO

INT

RD

EMPLOYEEPARKING

BIKE PATH

BIKE PARK

RAILROAD AVE

LUSC

OM

BE A

VE

WATER ST

9.22'

7.41'

FLOATING

PLATFORM 2

FIXED PLATFORM 2

FIXED PLATFORM 1SOUTH PIER

NORTH PIER

EXIT

5.85'

TRANSFER BRIDGE 2

����

�����

LUGGAGEPICK UP

LUGGAGEDROP OFF

LUGGAGEDROP OFF

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction August 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal with Bus Berth Solar Canopies

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction August 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal with Bus Berth Solar Canopies

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction August 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal with Bus Berth Solar Canopies

Solar Energy EstimateAugust 2019

Temporary TerminalGross Area 3,600 sfAverage Annual Energy Usage 139,629 sfAverage Annual Energy Usage per Square Foot 39 kWh/sf

Future TerminalGross Area 6,888 sfAverage Annual Energy Usage 267,158 kWh/sfAverage Annual Energy Usage per Square Foot * 39 sf

Annual Solar Energy ProductionBus Berth Solar Canopies 115,000 Rooftop Solar Panels 24,000

139,000 kWh

52%

* Assume equal to the temporary terminal

% of Terminal Energy Demand Produced On Site

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction October 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

EL 13' - 0"

EL 8' - 6"

EL 10' - 6"

VM VM VM

EL 10' - 6"

ATM

EL 17' - 0"

Childs Engineering Corporation

Marine Engineering34 William Way, Bellingham, MA 02019

DG Jones International

Cost Estimating3 Baldwin Green Common, Suite #202Woburn, MA 01801

Carol R Johnson Associates

Landscape Architecture

GZA GeoEnvironmental

Geotechnical, Environmental, Civil Engineering530 Broadway Providence, RI 02909

21 Custom House Street, Boston, MA 02110

Kalin Associates

Specifications1121 Washington Street #2West Newton, MA 02465

Thornton Tomasetti

Structural Engineering27 Wormwood Street Suite 200Boston, MA 02210

WSP

MEP / FP / Security/ Site Elec /Lighting88 Black Falcon Avenue, Suite 210Boston, MA 02210

Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & NantucketSteamship AuthorityFoot of Railroad AvenueWoods Hole, MA 02543

Drawn By:

Checked By:

Date:

Scale:

Phase:

Seal:

Sheet No.Phase

As Indicated

BIA.118 South Street, Boston, MA 02111T: (617) 423-6500 W: bia.studio

studio

OPTION B

Woods Hole FerryTerminal Reconstruction

A111

GD

LD

TERMINAL BUILDINGFLOOR PLAN

Schematic Design

07/ 23/ 19

1/8" = 1'-0"TERMINAL FLOOR PLAN 1

Issue / Revision Schedule

No. Revision Date

123’- 0”

56’- 0”

1

74

2

85

3

11

10

9

12

13

14 166

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal

First Floor Plan WAITING ROOM 40’-0” x 50’-0”

1.

4.

7.

2.

5.

8.

3.

6.

9.

10.

11.

12.TICKETING 12’-0” x 20’-0”

CASH ROOM 15’-0” x 8’-0”

PUBLIC WOMEN’S RESTROOM 12 W.C. / 10 LAV 24’-6” x 25’-0”

PUBLIC MEN’S RESTROOM 3 W.C. / 4 UR / 4 LAV 13’-0” x 16’-6”

ELECTRICAL ROOM 8’-6” x 12’-0”

EMPLOYEE RESTROOM - MEN 8’-0” x 10’-0”

BREAK ROOM 12’-0” x 12’-0”

JANITOR 5’-0” X 8’-0”

13.

15.EMPLOYEE RESTROOM - WOMEN 8’-0” x 10’-0”

VENDING 15’-0” x 8’-0”

TELECOM / DATA 9’-0” x 17’-6”

UNISEX RESTROOM 1 W.C. / 1 LAV 8’-6” x 8’-6”

14.

TERMINAL AGENTS OFFICE 13’-0” X 17’-6”

TERMINAL MANAGER’S OFFICE 9’-0” X 17’-6”

15

MECHANICAL 20’-0” x 23’-0”

16.

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

GRADE - EL. 10’-0”

FIRST FLOOR - EL. 13’-0”

MECHANICAL - EL. 17’-0”

18’-6”

GRADE - EL. 10’-0”

FIRST FLOOR - EL. 13’-0”

MECHANICAL - EL. 17’-0”

North Elevation

East Elevation

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal

Solar ArrayPergola

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

18’-6”

GRADE - EL. 10’-0”

FIRST FLOOR - EL. 13’-0”

MECHANICAL - EL. 17’-0”

GRADE - EL. 10’-0”

FIRST FLOOR - EL. 13’-0”

MECHANICAL - EL. 17’-0”

South Elevation

West Elevation

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal

Solar ArrayPergola

Childs Engineering Corporation

Marine Engineering34 William Way, Bellingham, MA 02019

DG Jones International

Cost Estimating3 Baldwin Green Common, Suite #202Woburn, MA 01801

Carol R Johnson Associates

Landscape Architecture

GZA GeoEnvironmental

Geotechnical, Environmental, Civil Engineering530 Broadway Providence, RI 02909

21 Custom House Street, Boston, MA 02110

Kalin Associates

Specifications1121 Washington Street #2West Newton, MA 02465

Thornton Tomasetti

Structural Engineering27 Wormwood Street Suite 200Boston, MA 02210

WSP

MEP / FP / Security/ Site Elec /Lighting88 Black Falcon Avenue, Suite 210Boston, MA 02210

Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & NantucketSteamship AuthorityFoot of Railroad AvenueWoods Hole, MA 02543

Drawn By:

Checked By:

Date:

Scale:

Phase:

Seal:

Sheet No.Phase

As Indicated

BIA.118 South Street, Boston, MA 02111T: (617) 423-6500 W: bia.studio

studio

OPTION B

Woods Hole FerryTerminal Reconstruction

A301

GD

LD

TERMINAL BUILDINGSECTION

Schematic Design

07/ 23/ 19

1/8" = 1'-0"BUILDING SECTION 3

Issue / Revision Schedule

No. Revision Date

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

GRADE - EL. 10’-0”

FIRST FLOOR - EL. 13’-0”

MECHANICAL - EL. 17’-0”

18’-6”

Option 2019.10 One Story Terminal

Section

DN

UP

GEN

ELEC.

16' - 0"

15' - 0" COMPACT

COMPACT

COMPACT

COMPACT

COMPACT

11' - 0"

Childs Engineering Corporation

Marine Engineering34 William Way, Bellingham, MA 02019

DG Jones International

Cost Estimating3 Baldwin Green Common, Suite #202Woburn, MA 01801

Carol R Johnson Associates

Landscape Architecture

GZA GeoEnvironmental

Geotechnical, Environmental, Civil Engineering530 Broadway Providence, RI 02909

21 Custom House Street, Boston, MA 02110

Kalin Associates

Specifications1121 Washington Street #2West Newton, MA 02465

Thornton Tomasetti

Structural Engineering27 Wormwood Street Suite 200Boston, MA 02210

WSP

MEP / FP / Security/ Site Elec /Lighting88 Black Falcon Avenue, Suite 210Boston, MA 02210

Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & NantucketSteamship AuthorityFoot of Railroad AvenueWoods Hole, MA 02543

Drawn By:

Checked By:

Date:

Scale:

Phase:

Seal:

Sheet No.Phase

As Indicated

BIA.118 South Street, Boston, MA 02111T: (617) 423-6500 W: bia.studio

studio

OPTION B

Woods Hole FerryTerminal Reconstruction

A011

GD

LD

STAFF BUILDING -FIRST FLOOR PLAN

Schematic Design

07/ 23/ 19

1/8" = 1'-0"1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN

Issue / Revision Schedule

No. Revision Date

1 4

2

6

3

11

1012

13

First Floor Plan ENTRY 10’-0” x 10’-0”

1.

4.

7.

2.

5.

8.

3.

6.

9.

10.

11.

12.ELEVATOR

STAIR

CONSUMABLE STORAGE 33’-6” x 13’-6”

MISCELLANEOUS STORAGE 9’-0” x 33’-6”

TRASH & RECYCLING YARD

LOST & FOUND 14’-6” x 16’-6”

WORK AREA 15’-6” x 10’-0”

STAIR

13.

15.RUNNER PICK UP / DROP OFF 14’-6” X 10’-6”

JANITOR 8’-6” x 5’-0”

WASTE OIL STORAGE 28’-0” x 16’-0”

EQUIPMENT STORAGE 31’-0” x 33’-6”

14.

VINEYARD SPACE 14’-6” X 10’-6”

CENTERPLATE STORAGE 14’-6” X 17’-6”

14

15

5

7

8

9

Option 2019.10 Utility Building

(Uncovered / Exterior)

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

DN

DN

15' - 0"

16' - 0"

Childs Engineering Corporation

Marine Engineering34 William Way, Bellingham, MA 02019

DG Jones International

Cost Estimating3 Baldwin Green Common, Suite #202Woburn, MA 01801

Carol R Johnson Associates

Landscape Architecture

GZA GeoEnvironmental

Geotechnical, Environmental, Civil Engineering530 Broadway Providence, RI 02909

21 Custom House Street, Boston, MA 02110

Kalin Associates

Specifications1121 Washington Street #2West Newton, MA 02465

Thornton Tomasetti

Structural Engineering27 Wormwood Street Suite 200Boston, MA 02210

WSP

MEP / FP / Security/ Site Elec /Lighting88 Black Falcon Avenue, Suite 210Boston, MA 02210

Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & NantucketSteamship AuthorityFoot of Railroad AvenueWoods Hole, MA 02543

Drawn By:

Checked By:

Date:

Scale:

Phase:

Seal:

Sheet No.Phase

As Indicated

BIA.118 South Street, Boston, MA 02111T: (617) 423-6500 W: bia.studio

studio

OPTION B

Woods Hole FerryTerminal Reconstruction

A012

GD

LD

STAFF BUILDING -SECOND FLOORPLAN

Schematic Design

07/ 23/ 19

1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN

Issue / Revision Schedule

No. Revision Date

Second Floor Plan ELEVATOR LOBBY 10’-0” x 10’-0”

16.

19.

22.

17.

20.

23.

18.

21.

24.

25.

26.

27.ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM 10’-0” x 6’-0”

ELEVATOR

MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM 25’-6” x 14’-6”

TELECOM / DATA 15’-0” x 8’-6”

EMPLOYEE RESTROOM - MEN 8’-0” x 10’-0”

EMPLOYEE LOCKER ROOM 20’-0” x 21’-0”

EMPLOYEE BREAK ROOM 11’-0” X 8’-0”

28.

EMPLOYEE RESTROOM - WOMEN 8’-0” x 10’-0”

JANITOR 8’-6” x 4’-6”

TERMINAL STORAGE 15’-0” x 32’-0”

LINEN 19’-6” x 15’-0”

29.

MECHANICAL 20’-0” X 18’-6”

ELECTRICAL ROOM 11’-0” X 8’-0”

Option 2019.10 Utility Building

16

17

18 19

20

21 22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Option 2019.10 Utility Building

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

FIRST FLOOR - EL. 11’-0”

SECOND FLOOR - EL. 23’-0”

North Elevation

West ElevationEast Elevation

FIRST FLOOR - EL. 11’-0”

SECOND FLOOR - EL. 23’-0”

Steamship Authority Woods Hole Ferry Terminal Reconstruction Terminal Design Options July 2019

BIA .studio Copyright © 2019 BIA Studio | All Rights Reserved

Terminal ProgramJuly 2019

Public Service Areas Public Service AreasLobby/Passenger Waiting Area 1,900 Lobby/Passenger Waiting Area 2,067 Vestibules/Entryways 344 Vestibules/Entryways 559 Food Concession/Vending 140 Food Concession/Vending 127 Public Restrooms 982 Public Restrooms 940

Ticket Selling / Customer Service Areas Ticket Selling / Customer Service AreasTicket/Cust. Serv. Counter Area 225 Ticket/Cust. Serv. Counter Area 258 Cash Handling Area 120 Cash Handling Area 120

Line Employee Areas Line Employee Areas Line Employee Areas Line Employee AreasEmployee Restrooms 160 Employee Restrooms 130 Employee Restrooms - Employee Restrooms 184 Employee Locker Room 415 Employee Locker Room - Employee Locker Room - Employee Locker Room 415 Employee Break Room 412 Employee Break Room 177 Employee Break Room - Employee Break Room 336 Dockworkers Restroom - Dockworkers Restroom - Dockworkers Break Room - Dockworkers Break Room -

Supervisory Employee Areas Supervisory Employee AreasTerminal Manager Office 120 Terminal Manager Office 150 Terminal Agents Office 258 Terminal Agents Office 258

Other Purpose Areas Other Purpose Areas Other Purpose Areas Other Purpose AreasMulti-Purpose Room 380 Multi-Purpose Room - Multi-Purpose Room - Multi-Purpose Room 380

Storage Areas Storage Areas Storage Areas Storage AreasJanitor's Room 39 Janitor's Room 35 Janitor's Room - Janitor's Room 82 Storage Room 156 Storage Room - Terminal Storage Room - Terminal Storage Room 486Storage Room 72 Storage Room - Trash & Recycling 1,000 Trash & Recycling 1,000

Waste Oil Storage 450 Waste Oil Storage 450 Lower Level Equp. Storage 1,100 Lower Level Equp. Storage 1,090 Lower Level Consumable Storage 460 Lower Level Consumable Storage 460 Lower Level Work Area 170 Lower Level Work Area 160 Vineyard Space 150 Vineyard Space 150 Runner Drop-Off / Pick Up Area 136 Runner Drop-Off / Pick Up Area 150 Lost and Found Area 275 Lost and Found Area 300 Miscellaneous Space 296 Miscellaneous Space 296 Linen Area 296 Linen Area 296 Centerplate Storage 255 Centerplate Storage 255

Mechanical/Equipment Areas Mechanical/Equipment Areas Mechanical/Equipment Areas Mechanical/Equipment AreasElectrical Room 104 Electrical Room 100 Electrical Room 90 Electrical Room 90Mechanical Room 630 Mechanical Room 550 Mechanical Room - Mechanical Room 432 Data/Telecom Center 178 Data/Telecom Center 160 Data/Telecom Center - Data/Telecom Center 130 Elevator Machine Room 30 Elevator Machine Room - Elevator Machine Room - Elevator Machine Room 62

Total Net Area 6,665 5,631 4,678 7,204

2019.10One Story Terminal

Terminal Building Utility Building

2019.7 & 2019.8 2019.10Unoccupied Occupied

2019.7 & 2019.8Two Story Terminal

Program Comparison