Upload
helen
View
40
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Staff Development Day Data to Inform Practice (21 century skills and capabilities). Dr Max Smith Senior Manager Student Engagement & Program Evaluation Conjoint Professor School of Education University of Newcastle 18 July 2011. NSW Department of Education & Communities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Staff Development DayData to Inform Practice
(21 century skills and capabilities)
NSW Department of Education & Communities
NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way www.det.nsw.edu.au
Dr Max SmithSenior Manager
Student Engagement & Program Evaluation
Conjoint Professor
School of Education
University of Newcastle
18 July 2011
As the Japanese proverb so ably puts it:
None of us is as smart as all of us
We need to move out of our comfortable silos and draw on each and every human being’s talents and energies
Educators as future makers• Education is a largely future oriented enterprise • Amongst its purposes are preparing people to live well in
the future: preparing them as future citizens and as future workers
• But more than preparing learners for the future, education plays a significant part in constructing the future
• What and how young people learn in school and tertiary education today very much influences what the world will be like in the future
• Education, then, is a future making process • Educators are future makers
As for the future, your task is not to foresee but to enable …French writer and philosopher Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Assessment literacyAssessment literacy as a strategy involves developing the
capacity of teachers and principals collectively to:
1. Gather and access dependable student achievement data
2. Make critical sense of the meaning of the data
3. To develop school improvement action plans based on (1) and (2)4. Be effective players, proactive and open about the uses and abuses of
achievement data -- being engaged in public discussion with a range of stakeholders so that the rationales for decisions are transparent
Fullan et al (2001), Accomplishing Large Scale Reform: A Tri-Level Proposition, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Prepared for the Journal of Educational Change, November
http://www.hfrp.org/content/download/3809/104680/file/PolicyForumPaper-120710-FINAL.pdf
Affective and academic outcomes:
The virtuous circle• It is readily
recognised that positive social affect improves academic outcomes
• Recognising the link between academic success and social outcomes is less commonly discussed
SocialAffect
AcademicOutcomes
e.g. The effect of learning in science on quality of life
e.g. The effect of self-concept on examination grades
Reflection:Assessment in the middle years• Uses collaborative 21st rubrics. Students and teachers
collaborating to develop learning activities and assessment tasks and inclusive of 21st century skills
• Allows students to own their learning and see assessment as an integral part of this
• Features open ended tasks that allow relational and extended abstract levels of understanding to be displayed
• Engenders independence in learning• Promotes higher order thinking and creativity • Features open-ended, authentic tasks that allow relational
and conceptual (extended abstract) levels of understanding to be displayed
The Department’s commitment
• The Department of Education and Communities is committed to preparing people to live well in the future: preparing them as future citizens and as future workers
• The Department is concerned not only to develop basic skills in literacy and numeracy, important as they are, but also to develop in all students 21st century capabilities
Social/affective v’s academic outcomes
Social/affective outcomesLow High
Aca
dem
ic a
chie
vem
ent
Low
Hig
hHigh achievers
Low achievers
Alie
nate
d st
uden
ts
Bon
-viv
ants
Academic Press
(Geeks)
Sinking schools
(Students at risk)
Lighthouse schools
(Transcendents)
Underperforming Schools
(Social Butterfly)
Goal congruence
ESSA science against liking-for-science
School-level relationship
ESSA science against liking-for-science
Student-level relationship
A taxonomy of social outcomes
OUTCOME EXAMPLES VIEW OF THE SOCIAL
Affective/attitudinal Pro-social values &behaviours
Feelings and beliefs Meta-cognitive
competencies
Psychological Individual skills &
attitudes Perceptions of self
and others
Social competencies Acceptable values,attitudes norms
Social skills (groupwork, problem solving,support for others)
Social practiceperspective
Institutional indicators Attendance rates Exam results
Rationalist Aggregated
Observed school andclassroomenvironment
Playground behaviour
Classroommanagement
Socialinteractionist
Ethnographic
Ainley, J., Batten, M., Collins, C. & Withers, G. (1998). (TBC)Schools and the Social Development of Young Australians. Melbourne: ACER.
Challenges of the 21st centuryFive challenges stand out and are often discussed in the literature: 1.Social challenges - vitality of our democratic society2.Economic challenges - such as preparing our students for employment in jobs that do not yet exist, creating ideas and solutions for products and problems that have not yet been identified, using technologies that have not yet been invented3.Technological challenges - such as preparing ourselves for the increasing power of, and dependence on, science and technology; information overload; and increasing global integration4.Health challenges - maintaining and improving our physical and mental health5.Ecological challenges - finding ways to live and work that are less harmful to living systems
21st century capabilities #1
The ability to think well including abilities to:
•think critically, that is examine, reflect, argue and debate
•think deeply and logically
•solve problems in ways that draw upon a range of learning areas and disciplines
•be creative, innovative and resourceful
21st century capabilities #2
The ability to live well including the abilities to:
•manage one’s emotional, mental, spiritual and physical wellbeing
•relate well to others and form and maintain healthy relationships
•have concern for the lives of other living beings
http://www.p21.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=119
Microsoft ITL research project• The ITL pilot showed that when educators develop
learning activities that require 21st century skills, students demonstrate them
• Howev4er, only 10% of assessment activities incorporated any 21 century competencies
• And more than 50% of learning activities scored the lowest possible score, suggesting that many educators are only in the early stages of teaching these skills
• Showed that educators need clear definitions of these skills, examples of how to develop them through teaching and learning, and a way to measure their success
Announced in January 2011http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2011/jan11/01-09workskillspr.mspx
The REAL FrameworkReflective Engagement (for) Authentic Learning
Three Dimensions
Four Levels
Affective responses to learningvaluing & enjoying
Cognitiveintellectual qualitydeep understand.
Operativelearning exp.towards success
Conceptual
Relational
Multidimensional
Unidimensional
Five probes
Geoff Munns et al.The Fair Go Project
Munns, G. & Woodward, H. (2005) Pen 155. Primary English Teachers Association
Questions about 21st century capabilities• What exactly are the 21st Century Capabilities?
• How can they be assessed? Pencil and paper/ tick a box tests do not seem sufficient?
• How are 21st Century capabilities best learned? How can teachers best support students in cultivating 21st Century capabilities?
• Assuming 21st century skills can and should be taught within the traditional disciplines, are they different from one discipline to another?
• What are the implications for teacher education and professional learning of the imperative of 21st Century capabilities for all?
• How can we validly and reliably evaluate education system’s efficacy in developing students’ 21st century skills?
• How do we build the capacity of systems to develop 21st century skills?
Reflection:Assessment of 21 century competencies
The Whole Mind
Dan Pink in his book reminds us that the future belongs to a very different kind of person with a very different kind of mind:
• creators and empathizers• pattern recognisers and meaning makers• artists• inventors• caregivers• consolers• big picture thinkers
The goal will be to invent a job, not find a job … a form of social entrepreneurshipBased on:
Confidence Build individualFriendships strengths
basedRisk taking education withPassion a strong global Unique ideas orientationMotivationInnovation
The diligent (righteous) gardener
Professor Yong Zhao, Presidential Chair and Assoc. Dean for Global EducationCollege of Education, University of Oregon
The stone age didn’t end
because they ran out of stones