Stability Analysis

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

power system analysis

Citation preview

Stability Analysis

Stability AnalysisS. MeikandasivamStability - DefinitionA dynamic phenomenon in a power system is, as said above, initiated by a disturbance in the system. Such a disturbance could as an example be that a line impedance is changed due to an external cause. The behaviour of the system after this disturbance depends of course on a how large this disturbance is. A small disturbance results usually in small transients in the system that are quickly damped out, while a larger disturbance will excite larger oscillations.

The IEEE/CIGRE Joint Task Force on stability terms and conditions have proposed the following definition in 2004:

Power System stability is the ability of an electric power system, for a given initial operating condition, to regain a state of operating equilibrium after being subjected to a physical disturbance, with most system variables bounded, so that practically the entire system remains intact.Classification

From Prabha KundurSwing Equations

POWER ANGLE RELATIONSHIP IN A SMIB SYSTEMPower flow equation in Salient pole model:

Steady state stability limit, which is defined as the maximum power that can be transmitted in steady state without loss of synchronism,TRANSIENT STABILITYTransient stability is the ability of the system to remain stable under large disturbances like short circuits, line outages, generation or load loss etc. Transient stability analysis deals with actual solution of the nonlinear differential equations describing the dynamics of the machines and their controls and interfacing it with the algebraic equations describing the interconnections through the transmission network.Since the disturbance is large, linearized analysis of the swing equation (which describes the rotor dynamics) is not possible. Further, the fault may cause structural changes in the network, because of which the power angle curve prior to fault, during the fault and post fault may be different.Due to these reasons, a general stability criteria for transient stability cannot be established. Stability can be established, for a given fault, by actual solution of the swing equation.The time taken for the fault to be cleared (by the circuit breakers) is called the clearing time.Critical clearing time is the maximum time available for clearing the fault, before the system loses stability.EQUAL- AREA CRITERIONTransient stability assessment of an SMIB system is possible without resorting to actual solution of the swing equation, by a method known as equalarea criterion.In a SMIB system, if the system is unstable after a fault is cleared, (t) increases indefinitely with time, till the machine loses synchronism. In contrast, in a stable system, (t) reaches a maximum and then starts reducing as shown in Figure.

The integral gives the area under the Pa curve. A SMIB system is stable, if the area under the Pa curve, becomes zero at some value of . This means that the accelerating (positive) area under Pa curve, must equal the decelerating (negative) area under Pa curve. SUDDEN CHANGE IN MECHANICAL INPUT

Under steady state/initial condn.Pm = PePmo, delo , ws at point a.

Sudden increase in input power Pm1Accr. Power Increases, Del increases, andPe electrical power Increases.

The area A1, during acceleration is given by

At b, even though the accelerating power is zero, the rotor is running above synchronous speed.Hence, and Pe increase beyond b, wherein Pe < Pm1 and the rotor is subjected to deceleration. The rotor decelerates and speed starts dropping, till at point d, the machine reaches synchronous speed and = max. The area A2, during deceleration is given by

By equal area criterion A1 = A2. The rotor would then oscillate between 0 and max at its natural frequency. However, damping forces will reduce subsequent swings and the machine finally settles down to the new steady state value 1 (at point b). Stability can be maintained only if area A2 at least equal to A1, can be located above Pm1. The limiting case is shown in Fig.5.9, where A2 is just equal to A1.

13, 90, 131, 19, 136, 14, 24, 59, 38, 191, 79, 181, 61, 202, 248, 165, 133, 157, 46, 185, 183, 250,257, 20, 108