60
Results of GAP Results of GAP analysis project analysis project 2007-2008 2007-2008 Karelian Research Centre of RAS А. Kryshen, А. Gromtsev, О. Kuznetsov . St. Petersburg, 2009

St. Petersburg, 200 9

  • Upload
    deepak

  • View
    33

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

. Results of GAP analysis project 2007-2008 Karelian Research Centre of RAS А. Kryshen , А. Gromtsev , О. Kuznetsov. St. Petersburg, 200 9. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Results of GAP analysis Results of GAP analysis project 2007-2008project 2007-2008

Karelian Research Centre of RAS

А. Kryshen, А. Gromtsev, О. Kuznetsov

.

St. Petersburg, 2009

Page 2: St. Petersburg,  200 9

“Gap analysis is a tool used in wildlife conservation to identify gaps in conservation lands or other wildlands where significant plant and animal species and their habitat or important ecological features occur.”

Page 3: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Contents• Partners and other participating Partners and other participating

organisations in Russiaorganisations in Russia

• Workshops, seminars, conferencesWorkshops, seminars, conferences

• Expeditions (field work)Expeditions (field work)

• PublicationsPublications

• Databases, GIS, Digital libraries and Databases, GIS, Digital libraries and Internet resourcesInternet resources

• PA network development in Republic of PA network development in Republic of KareliaKarelia

Page 4: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Partners and other participating organisations in Russia

• SYKE

• NGO’s (KROO “SPOK”)

• Republic of Karelia Government

• Botanical Institute, Petrozavodsk University, Joensuu University and other research organisations

Page 5: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Organization and implementation Organization and implementation of conferences, seminars, of conferences, seminars,

workshopsworkshops

Aim: sharing data and opinions, developing best solutions for nature conservation

Page 6: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Biotope seminar within GAP analysis work-group took place in Alexandrovka village near

Petrozavodsk, May 2007.

Page 7: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Green Belt seminar in Petrozavodsk

(June 2008).

• Over 80 specialists from North-West Russia and Finland took part in the seminar

Page 8: St. Petersburg,  200 9

• Over 100 participants Over 100 participants represented ten different represented ten different countries and about 40 countries and about 40 different NGOs.different NGOs.

The 9th Taiga Rescue Network conference “Effective use of forest - Effective forest protection” (Petrozavodsk, 1–5 October, 2008).

Page 9: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Working meetings with Finnish colleagues on GAP analysis took place in Joensuu (9.04.08–11.04.08), Helsinki (October

28-30, 2007, November 18 – 21, 2008), Petrozavodsk, (January 25, 2008; February 20–21 2008; May 12–14, 2008; May 19–22,

2008)

Page 10: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Expeditions (field work)

Aim: gathering data on the nature of Karelia, and finding potential gaps in the PA network

Page 11: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Yangozero area. Yangozero area. Expedition comprising researcher from KRC of RAS,

representatives of SPOK NGO and logging organizations was carried out to determine the conservation value of a pristine forest fragment.

The Yangozero area The Yangozero area was included in “RK was included in “RK Land Use Planning Land Use Planning Scheme” (2008) and Scheme” (2008) and excluded from forest excluded from forest use accounts of the use accounts of the “RK Forest “RK Forest Management Plan” Management Plan” (2008).(2008).

Page 12: St. Petersburg,  200 9

The area and boundaries of the Chukozero landscape reserve were negotiated among SPOK, KRC Forest Research Institute, RK Forestry Agency and Karellesprom JSC, and submitted to the relevant regional

authority

Page 13: St. Petersburg,  200 9

 Over 30 researchers from 6 scientific organizations took part in the multidisciplinary expedition to the Gridino village area.

Page 14: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Multidisciplinary expedition to Mt. Vottovaara area to define the PA boundaries and status

Природный комплекс горы «Воттоваара»:

особенности, современное состояние, сохранение

Page 15: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Another activity in the period was large-scope surveys of the whole territory of Karelia with focus on surviving undisturbed forest areas. This work includes inventory of operating regional PAs started following the initiative and with financial support from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fishery and Ecology.

Page 16: St. Petersburg,  200 9

PublicationsPublications

Page 17: St. Petersburg,  200 9

• A revised edition of the Red Data Book of Karelia was prepared using new (2001) IUCN categories.

Editors:

E. Ivanter,

O. Kuznetsov

Page 18: St. Petersburg,  200 9

• A. Markovskiy, O. Ilyina and A. Zorina prepared a colourful brochure – Identification guide of key biotopes (for biodiversity conservation) in central Karelia.

Page 19: St. Petersburg,  200 9

2007

Page 20: St. Petersburg,  200 9

2008

Page 21: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Природный комплекс горы «Воттоваара»:

особенности, современное состояние, сохранение

2009

Page 22: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Compilation of shared scientific databases on various natural Compilation of shared scientific databases on various natural resources, biodiversity and specific features of territories, resources, biodiversity and specific features of territories,

permitting scientifically grounded decision-making.permitting scientifically grounded decision-making.

Databases, GIS, Digital libraries and Internet

resources

Page 23: St. Petersburg,  200 9

• Болота переданы желтыми, охряными и светло-зелеными тонами в зависимости от типа болотных участков

• Лес – темно-зелеными (хвойный) и охряными (лиственный) цветами

• Озера выглядят как пятна черного цвета

• 688, 1206 и 3522 –номера болот по справочнику Торфяные месторождения Карельской АССР. М., 1979. 464 с.

Wetland mapping was accomplished, digitalized contours Wetland mapping was accomplished, digitalized contours (over 7000) were submitted to “Transparent World”; (over 7000) were submitted to “Transparent World”; identification of mire type is underway.identification of mire type is underway.

Page 24: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Inventory of Republic of Inventory of Republic of Karelia PAs began, and the Karelia PAs began, and the

pilot version of the GIS pilot version of the GIS “Protected areas of “Protected areas of

Republic of Karelia” was Republic of Karelia” was producedproduced

Page 25: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Cooperation with University of Joensuu: web-map of HCVF

Page 26: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Database “Habitats of East Database “Habitats of East Fennoscandia”Fennoscandia”

Page 27: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Internet resourcesnternet resources

Page 28: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Internet resources

Page 29: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Digital libraries

Page 30: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Practical implementation of KRC proposals:

All in all, > 400 000 ha within < 10 years

Page 31: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Kalevalsky NPKalevalsky NP (74 (74 4400 ha00 ha) ) and and Voinitsa LRVoinitsa LR (8 (8 4400 ha00 ha – – formerly part formerly part

of the parkof the park).).

Page 32: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Ladoga Skerries NP Ladoga Skerries NP (up to (up to 220220 000 ha) 000 ha) 2009 – 20102009 – 2010

•Researchers from KRC actively participated in public hearings on organization of the Ladoga skerries NP.•Author of the feasibility study for the Ladoga skerries NP designation A. Kravchenko became a member of the working group on the park organization and project leader in KRC

Page 33: St. Petersburg,  200 9

To be designated beforeTo be designated before 2015 2015::

• six LR and nature six LR and nature monuments in a monuments in a combined area of combined area of 140 140 000 ha000 ha

• ((included in the “Land included in the “Land Use Planning Scheme”, Use Planning Scheme”, excluded from the “RK excluded from the “RK Forest Management Forest Management Plan, 2008”Plan, 2008”).).

Page 34: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Map of the largest operating and planned PAs (game reserves excluded). Colours: green – zapovednik, yellow – NP, pink – landscape reserves (LR), light blue – planned NP and LR,

dark blue – largest waterside protection zones (water bodies having none are not shown in the map).

Развитие сети ООПТ КарелииРазвитие сети ООПТ КарелииPA network development in KareliaPA network development in Karelia

Page 35: St. Petersburg,  200 9

В 2008 подготовлена Концепция развития сети

ООПТ РК (рук. А. Громцев).

Схема развития сети ООПТ в РК (подготовлена

совместно со СПОК)

In 2008, the Concept of PA network development

in Republic of Karelia was prepared

(leader A. Gromtsev).

Page 36: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Conservation managers or scientists can use GAP analysis as a basis for providing recommendations to improve the representativeness of nature reserves or the effectiveness of protected areas so that these areas provide the best value for conserving biodiversity.

• The regional ad hoc programme “Republic of Karelia ecology and natural resources”, comprising projects on PA development and biodiversity studies and conservation, is underway (financed from the budget of Republic of Karelia)

Page 37: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Current network of operating PAs in Republic of Karelia

• Officially, nature conservation fund as of 01.01.2008 is 1,029,500 ha, i.e. 5.75 % of RK total area (de facto 3-4 %) and comprises 224 PAs (State Report…, 2008) + Voinitsa landscape reserve (8,400 ha – designated in 2008).

Современная сеть действующих ООПТ в Республике Карелия

• Официально природно-заповедный фонд на 01.01.2008 г. составляет 1029,5 тыс. га или 5,75 % от общей площади республики (фактически 3-4 %) и включает 224 объекта (Госдоклад…, 2008) + ЛЗ «Войница» (8,4 тыс.га – учрежден в 2008 г.).

Page 38: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Current network of operating PAs in Republic of Karelia

• PAs of federal subordination: 2 strict nature reserves (zapovedniks): Kostomukshsky, Kivach, 3 national parks: Paanajärvi, Vodlozersky, Kalevalsky, zoological reserves Kizhsky, Olonetsky.

Современная сеть действующих ООПТ в Республике Карелия

• ООПТ федерального подчинения: 2 государственных заповедника: «Костомукшский», «Кивач»; 3 национальных парка: «Паанаярви», «Водлозерский» и «Калевальский»; зоологические заказники «Кижский», «Олонецкий».

Page 39: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Current network of operating PAs in Republic of Karelia

PAs of regional subordination: nature park Valaam Archipelago, nature reserves, nature monuments, Petrozavodsk State University Botanical Garden, health resort forests around “Martial Waters” spa, buffer zones of Kivach and Kostomukshsky strict nature reserves, Kizhi Historical, Architectural and Ethnographic Museum-Reserve, and of Paanajärvi NP, plus tree stands.

Современная сеть действующих ООПТ в Республике Карелия

ООПТ регионального подчинения: природный парк «Валаамский архипелаг», государственные природные заказники, государственные памятники природы, ботанический сад ПетрГУ, курортные леса вокруг санатория «Марциальные воды», охранные зоны ГПЗ «Кивач»и «Паанаярви», государственного историко-архитектурного и этнографического музея-заповедника "Кижи" и НП «Паанаярви» и лесные плюсовые насаждения.

Page 40: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Objects with bedrock and Quaternary sediments(geological nature monuments).

Over 200 GNM* are recommended for inclusion in the PA list (160 of them shown in the figure).

Объекты с коренными породами и четвертичными отложениями (геологические памятники природы).

Рекомендуется включить в список ООПТ более 200 ГПП* (на рис. показаны 160 из них).

Page 41: St. Petersburg,  200 9

• Operating and planned PAs cover part of the ranges of all soils subject to protection, and designation of new areas for this purpose is not needed.

• Действующая и планируемая сеть ООПТ покрывает часть ареалов всех почв, подлежащих охране, поэтому нет необходимости в выделении дополнительных участков для этих целей.

• The priorities among planned PAs in this sense are:

• С данной точки зрения к первоочередным планируемым объектам следует отнести:

Zaonezhje PA, «Заонежье», Ladoga Skerries NP, НП «Ладожские шхеры» Gridino, ЛЗ «Гридино», Syrovatka, ЛЗ «Сыроватка»

Vottovaara NM, Ппр «Воттоваара».

Page 42: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Prioritized among 17 proposed aquatic PAs are 7 objects, for which sufficient information is available or feasibility studies are ready. Most of them are already included in the list of planned PAs.

Locations of 10 waterfalls - potential PAs

В первоочередные ООПТ предлагается 7 водных объектов (из 17), для кото-рых в настоящее время имеется достаточно инфор-мации или подготовлены экологические обоснова-ния. Основная часть из них уже включена в перечень планируемых ООПТ.

Page 43: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Provisional list of 200 valuable wetlands covering a combined area of ca. 300 000 ha was compiled.

Four large wetland areas were defined as designation priorities.

Ф и

н л

я н

д и

я

Ленинградская областьЛенинградская областьЛенинградская областьЛенинградская областьЛенинградская областьЛенинградская областьЛенинградская областьЛенинградская областьЛенинградская область

Ар

хан

гел

ьск

ая о

бл

асть

Ар

хан

гел

ьск

ая о

бл

асть

Ар

хан

гел

ьск

ая о

бл

асть

Ар

хан

гел

ьск

ая о

бл

асть

Ар

хан

гел

ьск

ая о

бл

асть

Ар

хан

гел

ьск

ая о

бл

асть

Ар

хан

гел

ьск

ая о

бл

асть

Ар

хан

гел

ьск

ая о

бл

асть

Ар

хан

гел

ьск

ая о

бл

асть

22

1816

17

1920 21

10

14

15

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 8

13

9

11

12

50 км050

Locations of wetlands proposed for designation

Составлен перспективный список 200 ценных болот для охраны на общей площади около 300 000 га.

К первоочередным ООПТ отнесены 4 крупных болотных и водно-болотных объекта.

Page 44: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Feasibility studies were Feasibility studies were prepared for three prepared for three landscape reserves landscape reserves comprising the last comprising the last surviving substantial areas surviving substantial areas of pristine taiga.of pristine taiga.

Locations of largest pristine forest areas.

Page 45: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Potential objects of the flora (15) – most important in terms of conserving regional diversity of species and vegetation in general.

Page 46: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Clear-cutting must be forbidden in zoological reserves. Game reserves are not PAs – hardly any nature use limitations (temporary ban on hunting).

Operating game reserves, proposed zoological reserves (15 reserves in 320 000 ha), and areas of the zoological nature monument rank (mainly bird breeding areas).

Page 47: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Recreational zoning. Landscapes of: 1 – minimal, 2 – low,3 – average, 4 – high, 5 – exceptional recreational quality.

All landscapes of top categories are represented by substantial areas in operating and proposed PAs of different categories.

Page 48: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Zoning by landscape representativeness. Areas: 1) unique, 2) rare, 3) peculiar, 4) common, 5) reference.

Given the PA network state-of-the-art, and if the proposals submitted are realized, the situation in conservation of the regional diversity of geographic landscapes (area of ca. 100 000 ha) would be satisfactory.

Page 49: St. Petersburg,  200 9

All natural complexes most vulnerable to human impact are partially “covered” by operating and planned PAs in a combined area of about 1/3 mln. ha, waterside protection zones not included.

Page 50: St. Petersburg,  200 9

ОТ ОТ ““ОСТРОВОВОСТРОВОВ”” К К ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКИМ ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКИМ

СЕТЯМСЕТЯМ

FROM “ISLANDS” TO FROM “ISLANDS” TO ECONETSECONETS

Page 51: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Interregional continuity of PA systems. (Green Belts of Fennoscandia)

An essential element of the spatial system of PAs of different categories in Karelia is their contingency with PAs in adjacent regions of Russia (Murmansk, Arkhangelsk, Vologda and Leningrad Regions).

Regional PA networks should be linked together or adjoined to establish an interregional and national system. Such continuity has to a large extent been created and is developing.

Page 52: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Largest operating and planned PAs in the Green Belt of Fennoscandia

1. Pasvik zapovednik2. Laplandsky zapovednik 3. Kutsa nature reserve (zakaznik)4. Paanajärvi NP 5. Kostomukshsky zapovednik 6. Kalevalsky NP with Voinitsa landscape reserve (LR) 7. Tulos LR8. Koitajoki LR9. Tolvajärvi LR 10. Ladoga Skerries NP11. Iso-Ijärvi LR12. Karel’sky Les LR 13. Prigranichnyi LR 14. Ingermanlandsky zakaznik

There are also some small-size LR – Podkova, etc.Total area of the above PAs is about 800 000 ha

Page 53: St. Petersburg,  200 9

• The interregional Green Belt is now forming at eastern borders of Karelia, and fringes also eastern boundaries of Fennoscandia (№* in Fig.):

- border with Murmansk Region: Kolvitsky zakaznik (1), Kanozersky zakaznik (2), Kandalakshsky zapovednik (3);

- White Sea coast (within RK): LR Polyarnyi Krug (4), Gridino (5), Syrovatka (6), Kuzova (7), Soroksky (8);

- border with Arkhangelsk Region: Vodlozersky NP (9),

Kozhezersky LR (10), Chukozero LR (11), Kenozersky NP (12);

- border with Vologda Region: Atleka LR, Verkhneandomsky LR, etc.;

- border with Vologda and Leningrad Regions:

Vepssky Les nature park (14), etc.

Total area of the above PAs is about 1.4 mln. ha

Page 54: St. Petersburg,  200 9

An essential element connecting nature conservation objects into a spatial system by corridors along watercourses and around waterbodies (combined area ca. 2.4 mln. ha).

All kinds of commercial fellings were prohibited. Only tending allowed, incl. “rejuvenation and conversion fellings”. Since 2009 however, voluntary selective and gradual felling is allowed. In reality, they are likely to turn into commercial felling taking the most valuable part of the stock (up to 40%). Officially, the region has 2.943 mln. ha of “protective forest”. Some 82% of them are waterside strips.

Waterside protection zones

Page 55: St. Petersburg,  200 9

2-km wide waterside protection zone of the Poncha River (Pyaozero village area) with an explicit belt of well-preserved pristine forest

Vil. Pyaozero

Page 56: St. Petersburg,  200 9

The most valuable and prioritized for designation are the following The most valuable and prioritized for designation are the following areasareas General profile onesGeneral profile ones ( (integrated, landscape reservesintegrated, landscape reserves) )

All included in the RK “Land use planning scheme”All included in the RK “Land use planning scheme”, 2008, 2008Ladoga Skerries NPLadoga Skerries NP ( (135 000 – 220 000 ha, see “National Park…135 000 – 220 000 ha, see “National Park…, 2001, 2001””; ;

area and outlines to be specifiedarea and outlines to be specified););Zaonezhje PAZaonezhje PA ( (170 000, see “Nature Park…, 1992”170 000, see “Nature Park…, 1992”; ; status, area and status, area and

outlines to be specifiedoutlines to be specified););Tulos LRTulos LR ( (68 500 ha, see “National Park…68 500 ha, see “National Park…, 2001, 2001””; ; area and outlines to be area and outlines to be

specifiedspecified););Koitajoki Koitajoki ((wetland) LRwetland) LR ( (36 300 ha, see “National Park…36 300 ha, see “National Park…, 2001, 2001””; ; area and area and

outlines to be specifiedoutlines to be specified););

To be designated before 2015, and already excluded from forest use calculations in the “RK Forest Management Plan”, 2008:

Gridino LR – 43 500 ha, (see “Rupestrine landscapes…, 2008”); Chukkozero LR (58 300 ha, see “Materials of inventory …, 2006”); Syrovatka LR (31 200 ha, see “Materials of inventory …, 2003”); Vottovaara nature monument (3 500 ha, see “Natural complex…, 2009”); Kumi-porog nature monument (3 600 ha, see “Feasibility study…, 2006”).Vargachnyi – Korbozersky nature monument (4 100 ha, see “Feasibility study…,

2007”)

Page 57: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Environmentalization of public mind

Understanding is growing at all levels that socio-economic problems can and should be solved in balance with nature conservation

Экологизация общественного сознания

Page 58: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Project participants’ accomplishments Project participants’ accomplishments recognised at the regional levelrecognised at the regional level

• A. Gromtsev was awarded the title of a 2007 RK Laureate for active participation in the Kalevalskii NP organization.

• O. Kuznetsov was awarded the title of a 2008 RK Laureate for nature protection activities and Red Data Book of RK publication.

Page 59: St. Petersburg,  200 9

AcknowledgmentAcknowledgment

• SYKE and Ministry of environment of Finland for the basic financing of the project

• Karelian Government: the regional programme “Republic of Karelia ecology and natural resources”, GIS “PA’s of Karelia” (partly financing)

• Russian Academy of Sciences: field work, publications, GIS, Internet

• Russian fund for basic research: field work, Internet

Page 60: St. Petersburg,  200 9

Thank you!Thank you!