Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Space Security Index
UN COPUOS
7 June 2011
Cesar Jaramillo, SSI Project Manager
Space Security Index
The Space Security Index
• Annual assessment of trends and developments that affect space security
• Provides objective and fact-based research to promote transparency and confidence in space activities
• Supports the development of policy to ensure secure access to space for all
Space Security Index
Defining Space Security
“The secure and sustainable access to
and use of space, and freedom from
space-based threats”
Corollary:
Space security goes beyond the
national security considerations of a
single state.
Space Security Index
Defining Space Security
Tension:
Space as a global commons
vs.
Space as a strategic environment for
individual states
Paradox:
States may be more willing to address
collective security challenges in space
when their own national security
might be jeopardized.
e.g. Space debris
Space Security Index
Space Security Indicators
1. The Space Environment
2. Space Situational Awareness
3. Laws, Policies, and Doctrines
4. Civil Space Programs and Global Utilities
5. Commercial Space
6. Space Support for Terrestrial Military Operations
7. Space Systems Resiliency
8. Space Systems Negation
Space Security Index
Operating in space
Areas of concern:
• Operating environment
• Growing number and diversity of actors
• Militarization/ Potential Weaponization of space
Space Security Index
The Space Environment
• The Physical Space Environment
• Space Situational Awareness
Image Source: Orbital Debris Quarterly Newsletter, NASA
Space Security Index
The Space Environment
Key Developments in Space Security 2011:
• Trackable space object population increases by more than 5%.
• Compliance with debris mitigating guidelines still inconsistent
• US to expand SSA Sharing program
• Malfunction of Galaxy 15 satellite prompts complex physical
and RFI mitigation plans.
Space Security Index
The Normative Environment
Laws, Policies, and Doctrines
Existing normative architecture for space activities is outdated
and insufficient
Competing Approaches:
•National vs. Multilateral
•Legally binding vs. non-binding
Space Security Index
The Normative Environment
False Dichotomy:
Status quo OR immediate prohibition
TCBMs as middle ground:•Voluntary moratoriums
•Data sharing
Space Security Index
The Normative Environment
Key Developments in Space Security 2011:
• Despite initial delay, US Space Posture Review is completed
• Russia proposes GGE to study TCBMs
• Deadlock persists at the CD
• EU Code of Conduct revised and ready for further consultation
Space Security Index
Number and diversity of space actors
• Access to outer space is
growing
• New space actors emerging
• Barriers to entry are sharply
decreasing
But: Limited resources (e.g.
orbital slots, RF spectrum)
Space Security Index
Number and diversity of space actors
Key Developments in Space Security 2011:
• Space Shuttle nears retirement
• ISS marks 10 years of continued operations and
uninterrupted inhabitancy
• Africa considers creation of African Space Agency
Space Security Index
Militarization/ Weaponization of Space
• Space Support for Terrestrial Military Operations
• Space Systems Resiliency
• Space Systems Negation
• Space-Based Strike Capabilities
Vulnerability of ground stations, communication links, and space
assets
Abilities to detect, withstand, recover, and deter attacks
PAROS
Space Security Index
Militarization/ Weaponization of Space
Militarization vs. Weaponization
Military uses:
• Reconnaissance
• Surveillance
• Navigations
• Intelligence
But: NO Space-based Space Weapons used to date
Space Security Index
Militarization/ Weaponization of Space
Key Developments in Space Security 2011:
• Jamming incidents continue to proliferate
• USCYBERCOM reaches full operational
capabilities
• Complex rendezvous capabilities continue to be
advanced
• Development of ASAT capabilities considered
by some countries
Space Security Index
SSI Project Partners
www.spacesecurity.org